Archive for the ‘Ukraine’ Category

Biden Tells Republicans to ‘Show Some Spine’ Against Trump on Border Deal – The New York Times

President Biden took the border fight directly to former President Donald J. Trump on Tuesday, blaming his predecessor and putative challenger for torpedoing a bipartisan immigration agreement out of crass politics at the expense of national security.

Weighing in forcefully after months of largely staying out of the fray, Mr. Biden called on congressional Republicans to show some spine and stand up to Mr. Trump. But he effectively acknowledged that the deal negotiated over several months was doomed and vowed to make it a campaign issue against the opposition.

All indications are this bill wont even move forward to the Senate floor, Mr. Biden said in a speech televised from the White House. Why? A simple reason. Donald Trump. Because Donald Trump thinks this is bad for him politically.

The president said that Mr. Trump would rather weaponize this issue than actually solve it and has leaned on Republicans to block it. It looks like theyre caving, he added. Frankly, they owe it to the American people to show some spine and do what they know to be right.

The decision by Republicans to reject a bipartisan border deal that they had previously demanded not only paralyzed the immigration debate but also imperiled security assistance for Ukraine and Israel attached to the $118 billion measure, closing off what had been seen as the best remaining avenue to aid embattled American allies.

The deadlock raised questions about whether Congress would be able to salvage the emergency aid package and, if so, how. Speaker Mike Johnson sought to advance aid to Israel alone by pushing a separate $17.6 billion measure. But it ran into strong resistance from hard-right Republicans, as well as Democrats and Mr. Biden, who threatened a veto, and failed to garner the two-thirds vote needed for passage on Tuesday evening.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit andlog intoyour Times account, orsubscribefor all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber?Log in.

Want all of The Times?Subscribe.

Follow this link:
Biden Tells Republicans to 'Show Some Spine' Against Trump on Border Deal - The New York Times

Border Security: Biden Blames Trump for Faltering Effort to Address Immigration and Ukraine Aid – The New York Times

President Biden took the border fight directly to former President Donald J. Trump on Tuesday, blaming his predecessor and putative challenger for torpedoing a bipartisan immigration agreement out of crass politics at the expense of national security.

Weighing in forcefully after months of largely staying out of the fray, Mr. Biden called on congressional Republicans to show some spine and stand up to Mr. Trump. But he effectively acknowledged that the deal negotiated over several months was doomed and vowed to make it a campaign issue against the opposition.

All indications are this bill wont even move forward to the Senate floor, Mr. Biden said in a speech televised from the White House. Why? A simple reason. Donald Trump. Because Donald Trump thinks this is bad for him politically.

The president said that Mr. Trump would rather weaponize this issue than actually solve it and has leaned on Republicans to block it. It looks like theyre caving, he added. Frankly, they owe it to the American people to show some spine and do what they know to be right.

The decision by Republicans to reject a bipartisan border deal that they had previously demanded not only paralyzed the immigration debate but also imperiled security assistance for Ukraine and Israel attached to the $118 billion measure, closing off what had been seen as the best remaining avenue to aid embattled American allies.

The deadlock raised questions about whether Congress would be able to salvage the emergency aid package and, if so, how. Speaker Mike Johnson sought to advance aid to Israel alone by pushing a separate $17.6 billion measure. But it ran into strong resistance from hard-right Republicans, as well as Democrats and Mr. Biden, who threatened a veto, and failed to garner the two-thirds vote needed for passage on Tuesday evening.

The result was a vivid portrait of congressional dysfunction. Rather than pursue the border crackdown they had once sought, Republicans in the House spent the day trying and failing to impeach Alejandro N. Mayorkas, the homeland security secretary, on charges that he willfully refused to enforce border laws. With even a few Republicans calling the move a stunt, Mr. Johnson could not muster a majority for impeachment in an embarrassing setback.

The disarray and discord on Capitol Hill, punctuated by the presidents sharp speech at the White House, underscored how much this years presidential election has already come to shape the debate in Washington nine months before the vote. In effect, two presidents, one incumbent and one former, are clashing over some of the most pressing issues facing the United States, each vying in a way to set the direction for the country even before voters make their choice in November.

Mr. Biden, who for most of his presidency has avoided even using Mr. Trumps name, referring to him only as the former guy or other elliptical phrases, has in recent weeks seemed increasingly eager to confront the former president more directly, culminating in Tuesdays speech.

The president privately complained that the initial draft of the address was not pointed enough in attacking Mr. Trump and wanted it toughened, according to a senior administration official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. He and aides then tested out tougher phrases shortly before he went before cameras to deliver it more than an hour after originally scheduled.

I understand the former president is desperately trying to stop this bill because hes not interested in solving the border problem, Mr. Biden said. He wants a political issue to run against me on.

Republicans have to decide, he added. Who do they serve? Donald Trump or the American people?

He called the bipartisan agreement a win for America because it combines the most fair, humane reforms to immigration law and the toughest set of reforms to secure the border at a time of record illegal migration. To buttress his point, he cited support from institutions normally favorable to Republicans, including The Wall Street Journals editorial page, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Border Patrol Council, a union that endorsed Mr. Trump in 2016 and 2020.

If this bill fails, I want to be absolutely clear about something, Mr. Biden said. The American people are going to know why it failed. Ill be taking this issue to the country.

The reason, he said, is Republican fear of their front-runner. Theyre afraid of Donald Trump, Mr. Biden said. Every day between now and November, the American people are going to know that the only reason the border is not secure is Donald Trump and his MAGA Republican friends.

The president is coming late to the debate. While he has supported the bipartisan negotiations, he has largely kept away from them personally and not waged a high-profile public fight for a deal. Aides said he wanted to avoid complicating the talks by making them about him. But some Democrats were frustrated that he had not taken a more prominent role until now.

The presidents speech was in part aimed at some Democrats who have already criticized provisions in the border bill that would tighten rules for migrants to gain asylum in the United States. If fellow Democrats vote against the measure, it could make it more difficult for Mr. Biden to frame his party as the one seeking solutions in the face of Republican intransigence.

Mr. Trump fired back at Mr. Biden after the presidents speech. America does not need a border bill that does nothing to deter illegal immigration, Karoline Leavitt, a spokeswoman for Mr. Trump, said in a statement. We need a president who will use his executive authority to shut the border down. Joe Biden clearly refuses to do that, but President Trump will get it done on day one.

Republicans have fallen in line behind Mr. Trump, including some who initially favored the bill, which includes measures to toughen border security but none of the provisions historically insisted on by Democrats offering a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants already in the country or protecting those previously brought in as children.

The legislation would make it harder for migrants to claim asylum and speed up processing of their cases, which can now take years. It would also expand federal detention centers, enable hiring of more asylum officers and border agents, and call for the border to be effectively shut down when the number of encounters with migrants making illegal crossings reaches an average of 5,000 a day. Critics on the right complained that it nonetheless did not go far enough.

Joe Biden will never enforce any new law and refuses to use the tools he already has today to end this crisis, Senator John Barrasso of Wyoming, the No. 3 Republican, said on Tuesday. I cannot vote for this bill. Americans will turn to the upcoming election to end the border crisis.

Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky and the minority leader, who was initially supportive of the deal, told reporters at a news conference that his conference had a very robust discussion about whether or not this product could ever become law and was influenced by Mr. Johnsons declaration that it would be dead on arrival in the House.

Its been made pretty clear to us by the speaker that it will not become law, Mr. McConnell said. Asked whether he had misread his fellow Republicans, Mr. McConnell said: I followed the instructions of my conference who were insistent that we tackle this in October. It is actually our side that wanted to tackle the border issue. We started it. Obviously with a Democratic president and a Democratic Senate, our negotiators had to deal with them.

Mr. Johnson cheered the Senate Republican reversal over the border deal. It may be on life support in the Senate, he told reporters. We welcome that development.

Mr. Biden argued that Republicans were not just sacrificing a border compromise, but also abandoning Ukraine during its war against President Vladimir V. Putins Russia.

We cant walk away now, he said, wearing a striped tie with the blue and yellow colors of the Ukrainian flag. Thats what Putins betting on. Supporting this bill is standing up to Putin. Opposing this bill is playing into his hands.

The grim reality, however, was that the once-strong bipartisan consensus for aid to Ukraine was fraying. In an unusual letter, a group of U.S. ambassadors stationed in the Indo-Pacific region urged congressional leaders on Monday to secure passage of the legislation, which also includes aid to Taiwan, saying that Americas credibility with its strategic partners was on the line.

For months, many in the White House and abroad had followed conventional wisdom and assumed that the combined will of a handful of like-minded congressional leaders, national security committee chairs and the president would be enough to push new funding to Ukraine across the finish line.

But a restive G.O.P. voter base is dead set against sending another round of taxpayer money to Ukraine, and rank-and-file Republicans, especially in the slim-majority House, have flexed their muscles to oppose any real movement.

After reports indicated there was no clear path ahead for Congress to approve aid to Ukraine and Israel on Tuesday morning, Representative Matt Gaetz, Republican of Florida and a Trump ally, was exultant on social media. He cited a line from the film Apocalypse Now: I love the smell of napalm in the morning!

Reporting was contributed by Katie Rogers, Erica L. Green, Carl Hulse, Karoun Demirjian , Zolan Kanno-Youngs and Michael D. Shear.

The rest is here:
Border Security: Biden Blames Trump for Faltering Effort to Address Immigration and Ukraine Aid - The New York Times

Ukraine-Born Miss Japan Renounces Title After Her Affair with Married Man Gets Revealed: ‘I Am Truly Sorry’ – PEOPLE

Karolina Shiino has stepped down as Miss Japan after it was alleged that she was having an affair with a married man.

The 26-year-old Ukrainian-born beauty queen announced her decision to renounce her title on Monday after a local publication revealed the alleged affair, according to CNN and the Associated Press.

Shiino was crowned Miss Japan on Jan. 22 and was the first woman of European descent to earn the title of Miss Nippon, CNN and the BBC reported.

I am truly sorry for the huge trouble I have caused and for betraying those who supported me, Shiino said in the Japanese-language apology she shared on Instagram, per the BBC.

Organizers originally suggested Shiino did not know the man was married with children but backtracked in their latest statement, according to the BBC. The man involved in the affair is a doctor and influencer.

In her apology, which was posted to Instagram, Shiino said she was too scared and confused to confess when the report came out, according to CNN andThe Guardian.

Never miss a story sign up forPEOPLE's free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.

The Miss Japan Association has said it accepted Shiinos decision to step down and said the role will remain vacant for the rest of the year, per the reports.

The association did not immediately respond to PEOPLE's request for comment.

The doctor involved in the scandal, Takuma Maeda,also apologizedfor causing trouble with the affair, according to the AP.

In his statement shared Wednesday on Instagram, Maeda said he does not plan to divorce his wife and promised to invest time in his work and private life.

Shiino became a naturalized Japanese citizen in 2022, according to the BBC andThe Guardian. She moved to Japan with her mom when she was 5 years old and is fluent in Japanese, according to the AP.

But Shiinos participation in the pageant has been controversial due to her predominantly European descent. After winning Miss Japan in January, she told CNN that she was happy to be recognized through the pageant.

I wanted to be recognized as a Japanese person, she explained. I kept being told that Im not Japanese, but I am absolutely Japanese, so I entered Miss Japan genuinely believing in myself.

Read the rest here:
Ukraine-Born Miss Japan Renounces Title After Her Affair with Married Man Gets Revealed: 'I Am Truly Sorry' - PEOPLE

Here’s What’s in the Senate’s $118 Billion Ukraine and Border Deal – The New York Times

Senate Democrats released a $118.3 billion emergency national security bill on Sunday that would tie a fresh infusion of aid to Ukraine to measures clamping down on migration across the United States-Mexico border.

The fate of measure, which has the backing of President Biden and Senate leaders in both parties, will turn on whether enough Republicans embrace its border security provisions a long shot given the opposition of former President Donald J. Trump and House leaders who quickly denounced it on Sunday night as a nonstarter that does not crack down enough on migration.

The legislation will need bipartisan support to advance this week in the Senate, where it must draw at least 60 votes to advance in a test vote set for Wednesday.

Heres a look at whats in the 370-page bill:

The bill includes $60.1 billion in military assistance for Ukraine, $14.1 billion in security assistance for Israel and $10 billion in humanitarian aid for civilians of global crises including Palestinians and Ukrainians.

It also would provide about $20 billion in border investments, including for hiring new asylum and border patrol officials, expanding the capacity of detention facilities and increasing screenings for fentanyl and other illicit drugs.

One of the most significant changes to border policy would be the creation of a trigger that would effectively close the border to migrants trying to cross into the United States without authorization. The trigger would be tripped if the average number of migrants encountered by border officials exceeded 5,000 over the course of a week or 8,500 on any given day. Encounters would have to fall to a daily average of 75 percent of those thresholds, again over the course of a week, for affected intake processes to start up again.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit andlog intoyour Times account, orsubscribefor all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber?Log in.

Want all of The Times?Subscribe.

The rest is here:
Here's What's in the Senate's $118 Billion Ukraine and Border Deal - The New York Times

Growing number of Conservative voters think Canada gives ‘too much support’ to Ukraine, poll suggests – Yahoo News Canada

This photograph, shared by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on the social media platform X on Wednesday, Jan. 31, 2024, shows Ukrainian prisoners of war reacting after a prisoner exchange at an undisclosed location in Ukraine. (Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on the social media platform X via AP - image credit)

As the grim two-year anniversary of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine approaches, a new poll suggests Canadians' engagement with the conflict is waning and support for Ukraine is weakening especially among Conservatives.

A survey released Tuesday morning bythe Angus Reid Institute saysa quarter of Canadians believe Canada is offering "too much support" to Ukraine in its fight, up from 13 per cent who said the same thing in May 2022.

Conservative supportersare adriving force behind that result,according to the poll.

The percentageof Canadians who voted for the Conservative Party in the last election, andwho now say Canada is doing too much to assist Ukraine, has more than doubled from 19 per cent in May 2022 to 43 per cent now according to the public opinion research group's findings.

"It's ... a massive jump," said Shachi Kurl, president of Angus Reid Institute. "This has the potential to be something of a political Gordian knot for Pierre Poilievre."

Sorting out the reasons behind the shift is largely an exercise in speculation at this point, saidKurl.

On the one hand, she said, there'sa longstanding tradition of support for the military among Conservative voters. That position may be in tension with Conservative support for small governments and lower taxes, she added.

"I don't want to overemphasize it but what is burgeoning, what is starting to sort of grow from out of the weeds into a fairly healthy seedling here, is this almost the Trump-esque, 'Canada First' mentality," she said.

"That mindset of conservative is not representative of the majority of the Conservative Party base in the country, or the entirety of the base. It is a minority, but it is a passionate, vocal and growing minority."

The poll suggests the belief that Canada is giving Ukraine too muchis also growing among NDP and Liberal voters. The percentage of voters who think Canada is doing too much for Ukraine jumped from 5 to 10 per cent among2021 Liberal supporters, and from 5 to 12 per cent among 2021 NDP supporters.

Story continues

Since early 2022, the federal government has committed more than $2.4 billion in military assistance and more than $352 million in humanitarian aid to Ukraine.

An emotional debate about trade with Ukraine

The poll landed a day after another emotional debate in the House of Commons over a bill to implement an update to the Canada-Ukraine free trade deal.

The Liberals accused Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and his party of abandoning Ukraine when Conservative MPsvoted against the bill in November. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has attributed the opposition to "American MAGA-influenced thinking."

Poilievre, whose party has maintained a largepolling lead over Trudeau's Liberals for months, has said his party still supports Ukraine and its objection is to the mention of "carbon pricing" in the legislation.

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre addresses the national Conservative caucus on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Sunday, Jan. 28, 2024. (Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press)

"I really think it speaks to how pathologically obsessed Trudeau is with the carbon tax that, while the knife is at the throat of Ukrainians, he would use that to impose his carbon tax ideology on those poor people," Poilievre said in November.

The trade agreement imposes no obligation on the Ukrainian government to introduce a carbon tax.

Last week,Poilievre called on the Liberal government to donate to Ukraine tens of thousands of surplus air-to-ground rockets that are slated for disposal.

The Angus Reid poll suggests Canadians, by a three-to-one ratio, believe the Conservatives'vote against the Canada-Ukraine free trade agreement will undermine Canada's reputation on the world stage. Half of likely Conservative voters believe there will be no effect at all, the poll says.

Kurl said elections based on foreign policy issues are rare in Canada, but for the first time in months Poilievre's opponents have something to talk about.

"He's spent little to no time on the defence and it has enabled him to stay very disciplined in terms of message and stay very focused in terms of a relentless attack on the government. And I'm not saying that those attacks in some cases haven't been cogent, or that they haven't been the result of really a litany ... of own-goals on the part of this government," said Kurl.

"But, you know, for the first time we we may be seeing something that puts Poilievre on the defence ..."

Canadians' interest dwindling

The Angus Reid Institute'ssurvey suggests the number of Canadians closely following news of the conflict has dropped from 66 per cent in May 2022 to 45 per centnow.

"Overall, Canadians are checking out of this conflict," said Kurl.

"And you can see that those who are less engaged are much more likely to also say, you know, we're helping too much, we've fulfilled our commitments."

The poll suggests Canadians remain divided on the role Canada should play in the war going forward.

One third of respondents agreed Canada should support Ukraine "as long as it takes," while one-in-ten believe that supportshould continue for only another year.

Foreign Minister Melanie Joly speaks to the media during a press conference with Ukraine's Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba in Kyiv, Ukraine on Friday, Feb. 2, 2024. (AP Photo/Evgeniy Maloletk)

Another 30 per cent are uncertain, while 20 per cent say they believe the war should end now with negotiations for peace initiated by Ukraine.

Just five per cent of respondents want Canada to end its support entirely.

The Angus Reid Institute conducted the online survey from Jan. 29 to Jan. 31, 2024 usingarandomized sample of 1,617 Canadian adults who are members of Angus Reid Forum.

For comparison purposes, a probability sample of this size would carry a margin of error of plus or minus two percentage points, 19 times out of 20.

The rest is here:
Growing number of Conservative voters think Canada gives 'too much support' to Ukraine, poll suggests - Yahoo News Canada