Archive for the ‘Tim Wise’ Category

How to talk to your white friends and family about privilege – i-D

Photo by Karla Ann Cote/NurPhoto via Getty Images.

In the days after George Floyds murder, more information emerged about the alleged crime that lead to his arrest. He paid for a pack of cigarettes, reports claimed, with a counterfeit $20 dollar bill. I didnt watch the full video of Floyds death at the hands of Minneapolis law enforcement, and neither did Mark McCoy.

What he did do, days later, is tweet. McCoy, a white professor at Southern Methodist University, explained that he was once also caught spending a counterfeit $20 dollar bill. For him, the arrest had meant a night in jail, and a dinner party anecdote for the next several decades. It didnt take a demonstrative video of people stepping back or forward in accordance with their social circumstances, or a timeline full of Black people explaining how theyd repeatedly been mistreated, overlooked and undervalued compared to their white counterparts, but 245 characters for a white man to succinctly articulate the scope of which this country favors the color beige. In under 50 words, Mark McCoy unraveled white privilege.

What I did, days later, was find myself at a dinner table with a conservative. Always gravitating to the coasts, its easy to nestle snugly into a near bullet-proof liberal bubble an ideological echo-chamber of sensitivity and awareness. But now, two feet of wood away during what is potentially the largest civil rights movement in history, sat another white person popping it. He didnt see racism as a tangible issue, because he couldnt visibly see it. Obvious acts of discrimination or disrespect werent in his workplace, he explained, his neighborhood or among his friends, and its just too depressing to engage with hard news. One by one, everyone moved away from our conversation, until it was just the two of us.

His problem with acknowledging the existence of white privilege was he didnt really feel like he had it. He may not have been academically-inclined enough for tertiary education or been able to afford one; he may have worked hard at underpaid jobs with long hours and no insurance; a parent may have abandoned him; he may have been physically assaulted; emotionally abused; overweight and nothing had been handed to him. There may be many, many circumstances in which the system hasnt benefited him, but whiteness, well thats just something hes never had to worry, or even think about.

For anti-racism activist and racial justice consultant, Maggie Potapchuck, this dinner table discussion is all too familiar. During the 1986 World Series, Potapchuk was studying at the University of Massachusetts. She watched as, after the game, white footballers beat up one of the Black residents in her dorm, before threatening other students of color with baseball bats. In that moment Potapchuk, a white woman, experienced a point of no return.

When white people hear the term white privilege, they sometimes hear it as disrespect of an individuals hard work and success, explains Potapchuk, who has written several well-referenced resources on the subject. White people still experience poverty, but their white privilege means [theyre sheltered from] the depths of poverty Black people might experience in the same conditions as them. There will still be different access to opportunity than there would be for a person of color.

Scholar, scientist, activist and author of White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack, Peggy McIntosh blames this mentality on the individualism fostered by a hyper-capitalist culture. Some think that the subject of privilege brings them blame, shame, and guilt, she adds. This is because they have been taught in the US to think only in terms of individuals, not systems. So, they take personally all references to their privilege.

In Invisible Knapsack, McIntosh addresses all the ways in which she enjoys positive prejudice, and therefore privilege, as a white person. Many are distressingly basic, such as, I can be pretty sure that my neighbors will be neutral or pleasant to me, or, I can be late to a meeting without having the lateness reflect on my race. They encompass financial reliability, media representation and career advancement.

The reason these privileges are so entrenched in our social architecture is because they were first written into founding US law, says Jacqueline Battalora, attorney and professor, who penned Birth of a White Nation: The Invention of White People and Its Relevance Today. You will find no reference to people called white people before 1681 in law within the English colonies of North America, reveals the former Chicago Police Officer.

Battalora specifically references the 1790 law of US naturalization, which was originally only accessible to white people. For 150 years, immigrants who were seen as white were able to access US citizenship simply because they were seen as white they did not have to ask for it, they may not even have wanted it.

There is so little understanding of US history and law that provided structural advantage after structural advantage to white people, she continues. Even though the laws have changed, the consequences of those laws continue to create wider inequality along racial lines.

The reason so many white academics have specialized in unpacking white privilege for white audiences is because white privilege isnt a Black persons issue. Although they do, again and again, it shouldnt be another reality Black people are forced to break down for our benefit. Potapchuks 2005 paper, Doing the Work: Unearthing our Own White Privilege, is aptly titled. Acknowledgement does take work, research, discourse and its on us to do it. But theres a reason we dont. Awareness of your power, and others vulnerabilities, is unpleasant. The same way a man may feel ill-at-ease walking behind a woman in a dark alley knowing she is wary of him, its not particularly comfortable to recognize you have been benefiting from and maybe even watering a society that holds others down so you can stand on their backs.

We need to be vigilant in developing a lens for seeing our privilege and not rely solely on people of different races to directly teach us, Potapchuk continues. Guilt and shame cloud the explanation because it is difficult to accept that ones attitudes and behavior caused another persons disadvantage. It is even more shocking to think how ones government and community institutions have created and reinforced these oppressive policies and laws.

It is difficult. Guilt is uncomfortable, and when were not used to discomfort, defenses arise. We might even get angry, because hey, we didnt create the system. Its not our fault we were born looking like this. But we shouldnt feel guilty for whats outside our control its not only unnecessary, its counterproductive. Racial justice expert Jamie Utt-Schumaker, who has focused on educating white people for the last decade, references Michael Kaufmans The Construction of Masculinity to describe the futility of guilt when it comes to facilitating any kind of shift: From a position of insecurity and guilt, people do not change or inspire others to change.

Too often we are treating privilege as something personal and interpersonal rather than systemic, Utt-Schumaker advises. This lends itself to an individualistic approach. But privilege is a manifestation of systems of oppression Remind someone that they shouldnt feel guilty for their privilege but encourage them to act to undermine the system by refusing to simply live in their unchecked privilege.

It is not unusual for white people to feel defensive, Potapchuk echoes, continuing, It is part of a mechanism that protects our image and self-esteem. Part of the process of individual change is being uncomfortable. It is challenging and sometimes overwhelming to take all of these messages in. Take time to reflect, discuss and struggle with the material and work to not avoid it or dismiss it.

There are various interpersonal techniques you can use when trying to address privilege on a micro-level. McIntosh suggests appealing to peoples morality, and then asking for reflection. If a person recognizes they are privileged, they may be willing to bring time, attention and money to bear on changing power relations in small or large ways.

McIntosh has seen an uptick in requests for her resources on privilege, which include exercises for family, friends and colleagues. One encourages a conversation wherein both parties list ways in which they might experience unearned advantage, or unearned disadvantage.

It is good to stay autobiographical and not judgmental. It's good to testify about what you were raised to believe and how you have changed and why. Then it is good to listen to other people doing the same kind of testimony. We all have our journeys. Preachiness is not effective for raising awareness. Self-righteousness is not a help.

Utt-Schumaker agrees. Hes seen two strategies prove effective: the meet people where they are, which is checking in to broaden ideas within more intimate relationships, and then more generally, pushing folks into a certain degree of discomfort by offering a racial justice perspective consistently.

We have to question what our goal is, he adds. If it seems unlikely to change someone who is vocally racist, the goal for me is helping to reduce the harm that they are likely to enact against people of color with their views. With a person who is apathetic, appealing to their values is key: Helping them see it in alignment with their own values to begin to address racism in themselves and their lives.

For her part, Battalora uses history to encourage empathy from the apathetic, recalling the words of activist Tim Wise: "whiteness has been done to all of us.

It is our ignorance of so much US history that allows so many to deny or reject the notion of white privilege, she says. A historical lens makes it absolutely clear that white privilege has been baked into the structure of the nation from its founding.

Nonetheless, we cannot assume we get it, Potapchuk claims, adding that we can be blinded by our own self-perception as a good white person. Just because we meant no harm doesn't mean that there was none. We need to take responsibility, avoid going into immediate defensive mode and focus on listening to another persons reality.

The reality is, at any given moment we might make a mistake, enact a microaggression or even say something racist but we cant avoid the dialogue for fear of misspeaking. Instead, we can lean into the mistakes, the discomfort, the learning, to ultimately respond and adapt. Stay consistently curious about others stories, and empathize as to how that may have informed their beliefs. We might pride ourselves on our upstanding values, our liberalism, our commitment to equity or justice, but we should never stop working. Because even if privilege pulls the blinds, injustice doesnt disappear.

Originally posted here:
How to talk to your white friends and family about privilege - i-D

20 Best Anti-Racism Books to Read Right Now – Prevention.com

Olaf Simon

As Americans continue protesting systemic racism and police brutality following the tragic deaths of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery, and others, people are also seeking ways to educate themselves.

There are endless resources about the racial discrimination that Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) face on a daily basis. This list is just a start. Thanks to the powerful voices of legendary writers like James Baldwin and Toni Morrison, and relatively new authors such as Ta-Nehisi Coates and Layla F. Saad, you can become a better ally in the pursuit of equality among all races.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

If You Want a Classic (Memoir)

$22.95

One of the most iconic memoirs in history, I Know Why the Caged Bird Singswill take you through a range of emotionsjoy, pain, heartacheby way of Maya Angelou's childhood. As she is sent to live with her stern grandmother in Arkansas, then back with her mother in St. Louis only to be attacked by an older man, Angelou discovers freedom through the words of famous authors years before she'd eventually join their ranks.

If You Want a Classic (Essay)

$13.95

A bestseller when it was published in 1963 and a classic today,The Fire Next Timeis essentially two letters written on the 100th anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation. Its unparalleled prose calls on people of all ethnicities to fight against America's ugly history of racism. Ta-Nehisi Coates says it's: "the finest essay Ive ever read.He was both direct and beautiful all at once. He did not seem to write to convince you. He wrote beyond you.

Learn About a Human Rights Legend

Born Malcolm Little in Omaha, Nebraska, in 1925, Malcom X went onto become an American Muslim minister and human rights activist. Written by Alex Haley, who dedicated his career to documenting the African American struggle, The Autobiography of Malcolm X"stands as the definitive statement of a movement and a man whose work was never completed but whose message is timeless."

Gear Up to Speak Up

$16.00

Why do white people shut down when race is on the table?In this New York Times bestseller, Robin DiAngelo artfully explains why racism isn't just limited to, in the words ofClaudia Rankine, "bad people."If you're ready to let down your walls and enter into constructive dialogues around race, this starting point will set you on the path toward true personal growth.

If You Want to Be Antiracist

$27.00

In this bestseller, National Book Award-winnerIbram X. Kendi mixes history, science, and law with his own experience learning what antiracism really means.Kendi "takes readers through a widening circle of antiracist ideasfrom the most basic concepts to visionary possibilitiesthat will help readers see all forms of racism clearly, understand their poisonous consequences, and work to oppose them in our systems and in ourselves,"according to the publisher.

If You Want More From Kendi

Before he wroteHow to Be an Antiracist, Kenditurned heads in the literary worldand won a National Book Awardwith Stamped From the Beginning, where he challenges the idea that we could possibly live in a post-racial society.With a focus on five influential people in history, including Thomas Jefferson and W.E.B. Du Bois, Kendi explains how racism was created to rationalize discriminatory polices. By emphasizing how racial bias is subtly and overtlyembedded in our culture, Kendi proves that racism is alive and well in the 21st century.

If You Want Language Tools

How do you tell your roommate her jokes are racist? How do you explain white privilege to your white, privileged friend?These questionsand many moreare answered in Ijeoma Oluo's New York Times bestselling book, So You Want to Talk About Race. As the National Book Review says, "Oluo gives usboth white people and people of colorthat language to engage in clear, constructive, and confident dialogue with each other about how to deal with racial prejudices and biases."

If You Want Personal Growth

$23.39

Layla F. Saad's New York Times bestselling book started with an Instagram chellenge:#meandwhitesupremacy, which encouraged people to own their racist behaviors in the name of personal growth. It went viral, motivating nearly 100,000 people to download Saad's Me and White Supremacy workbook. Her book is an updated version with more detailed context and resources to create lasting change.

If You Want Education Via Fiction

Toni Morrison's Home earned her the Nobel Prize in Literature, arguably the highest honor an author can hope to receive. The publisher calls Morrison's protagonist, Frank Money, a modern Odysseusas he escapes his small town by joining the army, only to return to the South in search of his sister, encounteringplenty of pitfalls along the way. While Morrison's depiction of 1950s America was conceived in her mind, she paints a vivid picture of what the Black experience was back thenand in some cases, even now.

If You Want Reporting and Prose

$11.99

In a revolutionary work that Toni Morrison called "required reading,"Ta-Nehisi Coastes addresses two essential questions:What is it like to inhabit a Black body and find a way to live within it? And how can we all honestly reckon with this fraught history and free ourselves from its burden? In a letter to his teenage son, Coates answers these questions and more through personal experiences and stellar reporting.

Deep-Dive Into Racial Segregation

If you want to dive into a specific issue within the wide spectrum of racial injustice in America, The Color of Lawbrims with awards as "the most forceful argument ever published on how federal, state, and local governments gave rise to and reinforced neighborhood segregation." Bill Gates even named it as one of eight "amazing"books in 2017. Other outlets have called it "masterful" and "essential."

If You Want More From Morrison

In Toni Morrison's first novel, the Nobel Prize winnerwrites powerfully abouta young Black girl who prays every day for beauty, wanting nothing more than to wake up with blonde hair and blue eyes. It'sa "powerful examination of our obsession with beauty and conformity"that will break your heart and open your mind.

If You Admire Michelle Obama

Michelle Obama takes the reader through life moments big and small in Becomingstarting with her childhood on the Southside of Chicago and all the way to the White House as First Lady. In this #1 New York Times bestseller, which has since been adapted into a popular Netflix documentary, readers will see through deeply personal accounts how she became one of the most admired women in the world.

Another Woman You'll Admire

One of the most prominent modern voices to emerge in feminist literature,Brittney Cooper masterfully proves that while"Black womens anger has been caricatured into an ugly and destructive force,"Black women not onlyhave a right to be angrybut can channel their emotions into a force for good. She uses superstars like Beyonce and Michelle Obama as examples, and MSNBC's Joy Reid calls it "adissertation on black womens pain and possibility."

If You're a Christian

$25.00

When Austin Channing Brown was seven years old, she learned why she got her name:her parents wanted future employers to mistake her for a white man. And thus began her journey through a racialized world. Growing up both Black and Christian, Brown shares through her own experience how the promises even well-meaning institutions make around equality can often fall short. Her goal is for all of us to practice what we preach.

Deep-Dive Into Criminal Justice

Author Walter McMillian, who is now the director of theEqual Justice Initiative, started out as a lawyer.Just Mercy is the truestory of one of his first clients,Walter McMillian, "a young man who was sentenced to die for a notorious murder he insisted he didnt commit." Named one of the most influential books of the decade by CNN, it's a powerful account of the disturbing bias that exists within the criminal justice system.

If You Want a Law School Essential

Written by civil rights lawyer Michelle Alexander,The New Jim Crow "spawned a whole generation of criminal justice reform activists and organizations" that were inspired by her core thesis:"We have not ended racial caste in America; we have merely redesigned it. It has spent more than 250 weeks on the New York Times bestseller list, helped inspire the Marshall Project, and earned numerous prizes.

If You Want to Raise White Allies

It's hard to talk to children about racial discrimination.Author Jennifer Harvey aims to make it easier in Raising White Kids. Whether you're a parent, teacher, church leader, or community group organizer, this handbook "offers age-appropriate insights for teaching children how to address racism when they encounter it and tackles tough questions about how to help white kids be mindful of racial relations while understanding their own identity and the role they can play for justice."

Deep-Dive Into Class and Race

Over in the U.K., most of the conversations around race were led by white people. That's not the way it's supposed to work!Which is why Reni Eddo-Lodge wrote Why I'm No Longer Talking to White People About Race. An extension of a blog post that went viral with so many people eager to share their own experiences, this book takes on"issues from eradicated Black history to the political purpose of white dominance, whitewashed feminism to the inextricable link between class and race."

If You Still Need Examples of White Privilege

If you want to see what it looks like when someone really owns their white privilege, look no further than Tim Wise (but actually, start here and then keep looking further). Here, he "examines what it really means to be white in a nation created to benefit people who are 'white like him.' You'll walk away with a better understanding of how non-BIPOCs can aid in the essential work of racial equality.

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

This commenting section is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page. You may be able to find more information on their web site.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

More here:
20 Best Anti-Racism Books to Read Right Now - Prevention.com

Screening of racial documentary The Great White Hoax set – The Hutchinson News

MondayJan27,2020at2:19PMJan27,2020at2:19PM

NORTH NEWTON A 2018 documentary featuring a widely acclaimed anti-racist educator is the third offering in the 2019-20 KIPCOR Film Series.

The Kansas Institute for Peace and Conflict Resolution at Bethel College will screen The Great White Hoax Feb. 9 at 3 p.m. in Krehbiel Auditorium in Luyken Fine Arts Center.

Wichita native, long-time journalist, and former director of The Kansas African American Museum Mark McCormick will lead the talk-back session following the 72-minute film.

It is free and open to the public, with a freewill offering taken to support the work of KIPCOR.

The Great White Hoax looks at the politics of white grievance, white supremacy and racial scapegoating with the help of teacher and author Tim Wise.

The film explores how American political leaders of both parties have been tapping into white anxiety, stoking white grievance and scapegoating people of color for decades to divide and conquer working class voters and consolidate power.

While its primary focus is Donald Trumps race-baiting 2016 U.S. presidential campaign, the film also widens its scope to show how Trumps charged rhetoric about African Americans, Latinos and Muslims fits within a longstanding historical pattern of racism and racial scapegoating that goes back centuries in American politics.

The rest is here:
Screening of racial documentary The Great White Hoax set - The Hutchinson News

Anatomy of a Smear – The Good Men Project

Dont get me wrong: Its not like its the first time.

I mean, seriously, Ive gotten used to right-wingers mangling my words to suit their purposes, and attempting to smear me: either as an anti-white extremist (because even though Im white, my Jewishness supposedly leads me to secretly seek the destruction of Aryan stock), or as one who is militantly anti-Christian.

And this they seek to demonstrate, typically, by digging up tweets or Facebook posts and presenting them either out of context or dishonestly representing what those statements say, hoping that those who see their version of things wont investigate my actual comments and think for themselves.

It is a particularly pernicious kind of fake news, and it is modern currency for reactionaries, especially internet savvy younger ones who tend to take a slash-and-burn approach to their politics, and have learned these methods from the likes of the Breitbart gang and James OKeefe.

Fortunately, I have the time to reply and demonstrate the depths of their duplicity. And doing so here will serve not only to make clear the disingenuousness of the smears in this particular instance, but will also serve to demonstrate the way in which right-wing media goes about its business: namely, lying in the service of their cause.

The latest smear comes from an outfit composed of student writers, one of whom either attended my presentation at Harvard this week, or watched it on the livestream provided by the school as part of their 10th annual diversity dialogue series.

If this person was in the room when I spoke, I had no idea, because he naturally never sought me out to ask questions, or seek clarification on my views, or challenge anything I had said. Likewise, if he watched the stream he never reached out via e-mail or social media to ask me about my comments. Because thats not the style for the right. They dont want clarification. They dont want accuracy. They hide in the shadows and rather than engage, they launch sneak attacks.

In this case, a sneak attack the headline for which was as follows:

Fascinating.

Needless to say, and before beginning work on this piece, I made sure to reassure my Christian wife, Christian daughters, and Christian mother that I meant them no harm and to please carry on. I wasnt able to reach my Christian best friend of 45 years to put his mind at ease, because he lives on the West Coast and it was too early. Hopefully he hasnt since seen the headline and determined that Ive just been faking it all along, waiting for the day when I could lead him and his family to jail for their faith.

But as I read the hit-piece I realized what the author had done. He had created a click-baity headline that bore no relationship to anything I had actually said. And he had apparently spent the better part of the previous 48 hours digging through years of Tweets and Facebook posts just to find a few nuggets he could pull entirely out of context to frame his story and justify said headline. Good work if you can get it, I suppose.

Before getting to the part about locking Christians up, the piece mentions that among my anti-Christian repertoire, are previous comments in which I referred to such as Jeezoids and fascists, and insisted that people who believe in a God of hell/damnation deserve to be mocked viciously and run out of the public square.

Pretty heady stuff, to be sure. But when you click the links you discover that the interpretation of my comments is, needless to say, lacking a degree of candor.

Have I used the term Jeezoids before to describe Christians? No, not Christians writ large. I dont believe most Christians are extremists, or the kinds of fundamentalists who resemble cult members. But those who do? Oh sure, those folks qualify as the kind of robots-for-Christ who merit the designation. One can still feel that the term is mean-spirited I suppose, or unkind. But to suggest I am applying it to the whole or even most of Christendom is simply a lie.

Indeed, there were two places in which this particular troll uncovered my use of the term, and exploring the context of both makes clear his dishonesty. The first was here:

Please note the context of this comment, which was in reply to an absurd and truly despicable tweet equating the treatment of Christians in America to the treatment of blacks under Jim Crow. And who had offered this vile analogy? Why, Bryan Fischer, of course formerly of the American Family Association: a notoriously bigoted anti-gay group, which ultimately fired Fischer for being such a bigot that even they couldnt keep him on anymore.

To call Fischer and his ilk Jeezoids is not bigoted, or even hyperbolic. It is accurate. To call him a Christian would be to slur millions of actual Christians who find his views repellent. That would be the true calumny.

Among other things, Fischer has said that we need an underground railroad to rescue children from same-sex households, that homosexual conduct should be criminalized, that discriminating against LGBTQ folks is not only acceptable but morally required, that practicing homosexuals should be banned from public office, that gays are to blame for the Nazi Holocaust, that First Amendment religious freedoms only apply to Christians, and that Islam is Satanic.

These are not the views of Christians writ large. They are not the things being taught in mainline Protestant churches, or in most Catholic churches, or in the Episcopal church to which my wife and daughters belong. They arent even accurate reflections of what all evangelicals and more conservative Christians believe. They are the bigoted and extremist positions of a sub-set of Christianity, no more reflective of it than the ISIS cult is reflective of the larger universe of Islam.

To call these kinds of Christians Jeezoids is not to mock Jesus, but to mock them for so clearly straying from the teachings of Jesus. They are the ones who by their bigotry mock the one they claim to be their savior. Not me.

The second usage of Jeezoids was here:

And once again, this was specifically in regard to a group of anti-abortion extremists who had engaged in deliberately deceptive smears against Planned Parenthood, and then violated multiple court orders during the investigation of their dishonest campaign against the family planning group. These people whose actions were exposed as lies, thereby in violation of one of those Commandments handed to Moses and which people like this insist others should live by are not representative of Christians. My use of the term Jeezoids to describe them was a way of distinguishing them from Christians. Any remotely honest person would be capable of discerning this basic truth.

As for the claim that I have called Christians fascists, again, this is not a term I have used, or would use, to describe Christians as a group. But it certainly applies to the above kinds of so-called Christians, and it is quite obviously that group to whom I was referring.

As for my desire to mock and run from the public square those who believe in a God of hellfire and damnation, let us go to the receipts in this case a couple of tweets from 2012:

Once again, the author demonstrated no interest in the context of the comment, but context matters. I was not making some rando suggestion that people who believe in God should be mocked or shut down, or institutionalized. I was responding to comments made by the Rev. Franklin Graham, who suggested in the wake of Barack Obamas re-election that God may need to basically destroy America as punishment for this grave sin and the nation having turned away from God. To believe in that kind of God one who would damn a nation for re-electing the black guy whose views you disagree with is to believe in unicorns, and especially vile ones at that.

Plenty of people who believe in a deity reject that image of God. Plenty of people who believe in a creator reject the notion that this creator is one who both loves the world so much, for instance, that he would give his only Son to redeem it but also possesses the kind of hate that would allow him to condemn to eternal damnation those who dont follow that Son as their personal savior.

As much as it might shock conservative Christians, their particularistic conception of God is not universal, even among Christians. They clearly have a hard time accepting this as one can see by the recent attacks on Pete Buttigieg by Rev. Graham and others but that doesnt make it any less true.

The only people I am critiquing here, and suggesting we should mock (or perhaps have committed, which I dont really support doing, actually) are those who believe in this vengeful, abusive God who operates more like a jealous and battering husband than a loving creator. Yes, for them mockery. Yes, for them, we should marginalize them entirely in the public square in the name of reason and logic and human decency. They can believe as they wish of course. And we can make fun of their inanity. And should. Daily. Loudly.

As someone who was regularly terrorized by this bunch as a child because they saw it as their duty to tell me, as a Jew, that I was destined for a lake of fire along with all my Jewish ancestors mockery is relatively mild retribution, and utterly deserved.

Now, to the locking Christians up thing.

Once again, lets look at what I really said. As youll see below, the allegation being made against me here is dishonest on two levels: first, because it ignores the very particular group of people I was criticizing, and second, because it conveniently leaves off the latter part of the Facebook post. Which is sort of important because it is in that portion of the post that I make it clear I really dont support locking up (as in mental hospitals) people who are Christians, or believers of any kind. In other words, if one reads the entire post, one can see I wasnt serious. I was trolling right wingers and they took the bait. Because they are the snowflakes they have warned us about.

Now to the post. First, the version provided by the right-wing rag:

Hmm, sounds pretty provocative; pretty intolerant, pretty much as if maybe the headline was right after all, right? Maybe I really do think Christians should be locked up.

But no. First, again, context. I was referring specifically to the kind of so-called Christians typified by the likes of Michelle Bachmann. And in the piece to which I was specifically responding, Bachmann suggested God might actually destroy America over the issue of marriage equality.

Of course. Because even though God wasnt sufficiently pissed over the sin of slavery, segregation, mass lynching, or campaigns of genocide against indigenous peoples at least not angry enough to destroy America over them the gays getting to wed thing has really pushed him over the edge. Mmm-k.

So yes, I was saying this kind of thinking is deranged. It is a sign of mental illness or a particular kind of cognitive dysfunction. I say that not to stigmatize mental illness by the way. I suffer from anxiety and depression so Im nothing if not sympathetic. But I believe people who are mentally ill need treatment of some kind, just like people with other types of illnesses should get the same. I dont think, for instance, that Michelle Bachmann can simply pray the insanity away. Thats not how this works.

I believe that if you are basing your morality on the ancient story of Sodom and Gomorrah a story that you show no indication of understanding, as it was actually not about homosexuality at all then yes, you are unworthy of being taken seriously. You are not well. You need help. But do I actually believe you should be locked up in a rubber room? Nah, which you can easily see from the next part of the post, which the writer in this case cleverly did not include in the screen shot:

Its right there. I dont believe lunatics like this should be locked up.

I do say they must be politically destroyed, and yes, thats a strong word for defeated, but thats what it means.

I also note that they should be allowed to believe and worship as they choose but they should have no influence on the rules and norms of a pluralistic society. In other words, and per the context of the post in the first place, their religious beliefs about marriage are fine for the way they choose to live their lives. If they dont want a gay marriage then they neednt have one. But to impose their Biblical views on the rest of us is to establish their religion as tantamount to state policy, which violates the First Amendments religious freedom clause.

You dont have to like the tone of my original post here. Honestly, I dont either and in retrospect could have said it differently, and should have. It was four years ago, and although Ive occasionally slipped into such tone since, I am really trying to be gentler in my presentation, not only for strategic reasons but also for reasons of simply being kinder.

That said, and however one feels about how I made the points here, I simply did not say what I am accused of saying. And I surely did not apply even the things I did say to all or most Christians, or believers in God.

That these things could have been clarified for the writer who saw it as his duty to expose me as a hateful bigot is obvious. He could have raised his hand and asked a question about them were he in the room. He could have approached me afterwards at the book-signing, and asked about them there. Or, if he watched the livestream he could have e-mailed me to inquire about the comments, and whether I stood by them, or what I meant by them.

But he did none of these things. Because to him, and the right-wing media world he serves, clarification and discussion serve no purpose. It is all gotcha, all the time. All about the take-down. All about the manufactured outrage. All about posing as victims of leftist hatred while flacking for those who regularly dispense real hatred against LGBTQ folks among others as seen in the above examples.

Its a shame I even have to waste time responding to such nonsense. But in a world where lies can travel around the globe in the click of a button and where certain unstable people will believe those lies and threaten those about whom the lies are told one cannot allow such vicious slanders and misrepresentations to stand. I certainly will not.

But by all means, keep bearing false witness fellas. And dont let that pesky 9th Commandment get in the way.

Im an antiracism educator/author. I Facebook & tweet @timjacobwise, podcast at Speak Out With Tim Wise & post bonus content at patreon.com/speakoutwithtimwise

This post was previously published on Medium and is republished here with permission from the author.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.

Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

Photo credit: iStock

Read the original:
Anatomy of a Smear - The Good Men Project

Tim Wise, who helped defeat David Duke in 1990 & 1991 has …

(This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Sunday July 21, 2019 10:02 AM PDT

2019/07/21 10:02

The whole thread is worth reading, but here are some excerpts...

He also points out that focusing on fine policy pointsnormalizes Trump by shifting the focus away from theracism and vile thinking at the core of his campaign. It allows Trump to take credit for the current economy, and any lingering prosperity. It allows onepeople to give themselves an excuse to vote for him. We cant give people any excuse. All his faults and crimes should be laid bare.

@subirgrewal

{{backgroundUrl avatar_large}}

Joined: {{created_at}}

Story Count: {{n_stories}}

Comment Count: {{n_comments}}

Popular Tags: {{showTags popular_tags}}

{{#each badges}} {{badgeUrl .}} {{/each}}

{{authorSig user_sig}}

{{/if}} Recommended {{n_recrates}} time{{simplePlural n_recrates}} {{/ifcanRecComment}}

See the rest here:
Tim Wise, who helped defeat David Duke in 1990 & 1991 has ...