Archive for the ‘Social Networking’ Category

Germany to fine social networks up to 50m for not taking down illegal ‘fake news’ posts – The Independent

Social networks that fail to remove defamatoryfake news, hate speech and otherillegal content will be fined up to 50m (43m) under new plans agreed by the German government.

Angela Merkels cabinet voted on the measures amid concerns over free speech, with campaigners, technology firms and journalists raising fears that tightened regulations could restrict expression.

Heiko Maas, the German justice minister, vowed to push for similar rules Europe-wide, adding: There should be just as little tolerance for criminal incitement on social networks as on the street.

Trump calls leak fake newsand something that Nazi Germany would have done

We owe it to the victims of hate crime to manage this better.

The bill strengthens Germanys existing laws covering hate speech, slander, defamation, threats and incitement, adding to prison sentences already enforceable for Holocaust denial or inciting hatred against minorities.

The issue has taken on increasing urgency ahead of the countrys federal elections in September, with concerns the proliferation of fake news and racist content online could affect the outcome.

Fears over terror attacks claimed by Isis have been a point of contention, as has the reaction to the arrival of more than 1 million refugees in Germany over the past two years.

Facebookwon a court case last month after a Syrian refugee falsely accused of being a terrorist and attempted murderer in a series of xenophobic posts attempted to sue the social networking giant for damages.

Anas Modamani, whose chance selfie with Ms Merkel is one of a series of images seized upon by far-right groups, argued that failure to remove the posts put him at risk.

His lawyer pointed out that Facebooks community standards violations did not include libel, which is a criminal offence in Germany, the UK and elsewhere.

A photo of Anas Modamani taking a selfie with Angela Merkel went viral after it was used by news organisations around the world (Getty)

The new law would give social networks 24 hours to delete or block criminal content and seven days to deal with less clear-cut cases, with an obligation to report back to the person who filed the complaint about how it was handled.

Failure to comply could see a company fined up to 50m (43m), with its chief representative in Germany handed an additional penalty of 5m (4.3m).

The Digital Society Association was among the groups opposing the move, with its head Volker Tripp saying: It is the wrong approach to make social networks into a content police.

Bitkom, an association that represents digital companies, said the government should build up specialist teams to monitor online content for potential infringements, rather than expect social networks to do it themselves.

Given the short deadlines and the severe penalties, providers will be forced to delete doubtful statements as a precaution,said Bitkom manager Bernhard Rohleder.

That would have a serious impact on free speech on the internet.

Since it was unveiled last month, the draft law has been amended to include new categories of content, such as child pornography and now allows courts to order social networks to reveal the identity of the user behind criminal posts.

To address concerns over free speech, the legislation was tweaked to make clear that a fine would not necessarily be imposed after just one infraction, and still needs to be approved by the Bundestag.

Mr Maas said freedom of expression was of huge importance in Germany, but that freedom of expression ends where criminal law begins.

The justice ministry said research showed that Facebook deleted just 39 per cent of content reported by users and Twitteronly 1 per cent, despite signing a code of conduct in 2015 that included a pledge to delete hate speech within 24 hours.

The cabinet also approved a new law cracking down on the recognition of child marriage among arriving refugees on Wednesday.

It proposes automatically declaring certificates void if one of the partners was under the age of 16 when they wed, despite concerns that the move would leave young female asylum seekers and those with children vulnerable.

In principle, marriages involving under-18s will also not be recognised, but courts will be allowed to decide whether to annul them on a case-by-case basis after receiving advice from youth protection agencies.

Cabinet members agreed the measure as a newspaper report claimed that about 270,000 Syrians living in Germany have the right to bring their family members into the country.

Bilds report could add fuel to the raging debate about migration less than six months before national elections, where Ms Merkel is seeking a fourth term as Chancellor.

Her conservative bloc faces opposition from the anti-immigration Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which haslost support in recent months amid improving poll performances by the centre-left Social Democrats.

Continued here:
Germany to fine social networks up to 50m for not taking down illegal 'fake news' posts - The Independent

The coder who built Mastodon is 24, fiercely independent, and … – Mashable


Naked Security
The coder who built Mastodon is 24, fiercely independent, and ...
Mashable
Mastodon, that giant cartoon mammal that's been rampaging across the internet this week, is not the product of a Silicon Valley start-up. Instead, the social ...
Mastodon: new beast to challenge Big Social, or another white elephant?Naked Security
Mastodon, the social network that wants to crush TwitterBlasting News
Mastodon's sudden popularity should serve as Twitter's wakeup callEngadget
The Verge -Patreon
all 44 news articles »

Read the rest here:
The coder who built Mastodon is 24, fiercely independent, and ... - Mashable

Facebook Introduces New Tools to Fight Revenge Porn – PCMag India

Facebook today introduced new tools designed to help victims of so-called revenge porn.

Going forward, if you happen to come across an intimate image on Facebook that you believe was shared without permission, it will be easier to report it. To do so, just tap on the downward arrow or "" next to a post and click "Report."

Once you report it, "specially trained representatives" from Facebook's Community Operations team will review the image and, if it's found to be in violation of the social network's Community Standards, will take it down.

"In most cases, we will also disable the account for sharing intimate images without permission," Facebook's Head of Global Safety Antigone Davis wrote in a blog post. "We offer an appeals process if someone believes an image was taken down in error."

The company also plans to use "photo-matching technologies" to prevent any subsequent attempts to share the same image on not only Facebook but also Messenger and Instagram. If someone tries to share the image after it's been reported or removed, Facebook won't allow it and the person will get a notification stating that the image violates the social network's policies.

Finally, Facebook is partnering with safety organizations to offer revenge porn victims resources and support.

"These tools, developed in partnership with safety experts, are one example of the potential technology has to help keep people safe," Davis wrote. "We look forward to building on these tools and working with other companies to explore how they could be used across the industry."

According to a recent study from the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative, 93 percent of US revenge porn victims suffer "significant emotional distress" as a result of the abuse, while 82 percent report "significant impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas" of their life.

Continue reading here:
Facebook Introduces New Tools to Fight Revenge Porn - PCMag India

Feds, Seeking Twitter Account Data, Get Lawsuit Instead – PCMag India

Twitter filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration on Thursday to stop federal agencies from compelling the company to hand over information about an anti-Trump account.

The suit, which lists the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its secretary John Kelly among the defendants, claims that DHS is abusing its power by trying to unmask the identity of the person behind the @ALT_uscis account.

The account is one of many created after President Donald Trump took office, purporting to be owned by current or former employees of federal agencies who often send tweets to speak out anonymously against the Trump administration. Twitter received an administrative summons in March from the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency requesting records that would reveal the identity of the @ALT_uscis account holder, according to the lawsuit.

Twitter's lawyers wrote that the company is refusing to give up that information because "permitting CBP to pierce the pseudonym of the @ALT_uscis account would have a grave chilling effect on the speech of that account in particular and on the many other 'alternative agency' accounts that have been created to voice dissent to government policies."

The CBP summons did not indicate that the any laws had been broken, nor did the agency obtain a court order to prevent Twitter from notifying the @ALT_uscis account holder about the request for information, according to the lawsuit. Twitter said that it informed the account holder on April 4, and told CBP that its request infringes on the First Amendment rights of the company and its users.

A DHS spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Twitter, like other social media companies, frequently receives requests from law enforcement agencies to remove content or for more information about specific accounts. During the second half of last year, the company received 2,304 such requests from US law enforcement agencies, and offered up information for 82 percent of them, according to its latest transparency report.

See the original post here:
Feds, Seeking Twitter Account Data, Get Lawsuit Instead - PCMag India

World’s Most Annoying Social Network Wants You to Worry About Other Companies Selling Your Data – Heat Street

The worlds most spam-prone website LinkedIn has had a sudden change of heart: It now wants you to beconcerned aboutCongress recent decision to allow broadband providers to sell your private browsing data to advertisers.

On Monday, LinkedIn sent out an email sponsoring an article written by Anurag Harsh, LinkedIns #1 Voice in Technology, titled Your Browser History Could Be for Sale Soon. Are You Concerned?

The article warns of the potential dangers of letting broadband providers sell your browsing data to others. What can someone with access to that kind of information do?Harshasked.

Your service provider could sell your personal information to the highest bidder; and not just your demographics, but also your user behavior. That very information is the bedrock of personalized advertising. Its why companies like Amazon are so successful, headded.

The people who wrote Public Service Announcementclearly missed the irony. LinkedIn has long been the king of spam, bogging down email inboxeswith irrelevantsuggestions and sponsoredrecommendations. In 2015, the company had to pay out $13 million because of its fondness for spamming users.

ViaTIME Magazine:

The suit originated in California in 2013, when LinkedIn users sued the company claiming its Add Connections feature hurt their professional reputation by relentlessly messaging their email contacts with requests to connect on LinkedIn, Fortune reports. In the complaint, users described being embarrassed by the emails and complained that it was very difficult to stop LinkedIn from sending more emails once the barrage had begun. The settlement affects users who signed up for LinkedIns Add Connections feature between September 2011 and October 2014.

The ironyfor LinkedIn doesntend here. Back in 2014, according to a lawsuit, the social media network was accused of secretly selling usersprofessional datathe exact thing LinkedIn is now ringing the alarm about.

Via The Recorder and Gawker:

According to the suit, LinkedIn can mine the information provided by users of its professional networking website to find potential references for job applicants without the applicants knowledge. Searches yield a list of the names and current job titles for potential references, along with the common employer they share with the applicant and time worked together.

The complaint claims that these reference lists amount to a consumer report under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and that LinkedIn fails to abide by safeguards required under the law.

In essence, LinkedIn has created a marketplace in consumer employment information, where it sells employment information, that may or may not be accurate, and that it has obtained in part from unwitting members, and without complying with the FCRA, write the plaintiffs lawyers at Greenwald Davidson in Boca Raton, Fla., and the Law Offices Todd M. Friedman in Beverly Hills. Plaintiffs are asking for statutory damages for willful violation of the FCRA, which run from $100 to $1,000 per violation.

But thanks, LinkedIn, for taking some time out from spamming us to give us a heads-up on Internet privacy.

More:
World's Most Annoying Social Network Wants You to Worry About Other Companies Selling Your Data - Heat Street