Archive for the ‘Social Marketing’ Category

New Report Looks at the Rise of Virtual Influencers on Instagram – Social Media Today

Social media was created to facilitate human connection, to amplify our interactive capability by providing new ways for us to share our lives and experiences, and relate to others around the same.

Social media gurus have been preaching along these lines for years - in order to succeed on social platforms, you need to 'be more human', you need to 'humanize your brand', 'it's human connection that matters'. And while there are many examples of such approaches leading to greater success for brands online, there is another, rising trend which largely goes against this, and brings into question the very future of the form.

That trend is the rising popularity of virtual influencers - computer-generated models which are gaining popularity, especially on Instagram.

Virtual influencers, as you can see here, run a broad spread of variation - from so close to real that you can't tell, to cartoonish, Sim-like characters which seem completely out of place.

But they are, indeed, rising - recently, social analytics platform HypeAuditor put together an overview of some of the top virtual influencers, and their performance stats over the last year.

And the numbers speak for themselves:

According to HypeAuditor's report:

"Virtual Influencers have almost three times more engagement than real influencers. That means that followers are more engaged with virtual influencers content."

That's an amazing trend, especially when you consider what it could mean for the future of influencer marketing. If these findings are correct, and virtual influencers are on such a significant rise, that will lead to more brands looking into the same. Virtual influencers are unpaid, unbiased, available 24/7 - and, evidently, very popular.

Is this the next wave set to flow through your Instagram streams?

In terms of who, specifically, is engaging with these computer-based characters, the profile shows that younger female users are more likely to engage with virtual influencers.

You can see that 18-24 year-old female users are significantly more likely to engage with these creations. Additionally, HypeAuditor's data shows that US users are far more likely to engage with virtual personalities.

So who are they, and why are they on the rise? You can take a look for yourself - HypeAuditor has also provided a listing of the top virtual influencers worldwide, along with their rising follower counts.

As noted, the characters themselves range from hyper-realistic to cartoonish depictions. The leading virtual influencer is lilmiquela, with 1.7 million followers, followed by the Bratz-doll like noonoouri(332k followers), the mostly real looking imma(159k) and the hyper-real Shudu (193k).

Most of the Instagram profiles for these characters note that it's a virtual or digital character within their bios, but as these types of models rise, it'll be interesting to see if more try to disguise the fact that they're not real - and whether regulations may need to be established on disclosure over such.

Right now, however, there are some limitations on virtual character use. Building realistic 3D models is expensive -maybe more expensive than simply using real people in some cases - but as technology advances, those costs will go down, and open the door to more businesses looking to utilize the same.

That could also, however, lead to new questions around depictions of realistic body types and their impacts on impressionable users. We already see such debates when looking at real models, and how young women, in particular, compare their bodies to them - but these characters aren't even real. No diet tricks can help you obtain a virtual waistline.

It's an interesting area, and one which is likely to come up for increased debate in times to come. HypeAuditor suggests that novelty is a key element in their current popularity, and as digital models become more commonplace, they'll lose some of that interest. But will they? Will we even know who's real and who's not in future?

The stats here would suggest that it's likely to become a bigger point of discussion.

Continued here:
New Report Looks at the Rise of Virtual Influencers on Instagram - Social Media Today

Why The Unmistakables represents a ‘first principles’ approach to diversity and inclusion – The Drum

The Unmistakables won Best in Diversity & Inclusivity in an organisation at The Drum Social Purpose Awards 2019. Here, the agency reveals the background to winning this award.

The challenge

Weve all been in brainstorms addressing how to make brands more diverse or organisations more inclusive. The talk is easy but, unfortunately, the action is all too rare.

As a professional working in the marketing and communications industry, Asad Dhunna realised that a major part of the problem was the workforce status quo. Its lack of diversity continues to see it majority white, male, straight and middle class. He had an idea. What if he created a consultancy of minorities, made of people who knew what it was like to be different? What if he could find others who, like him, consider marketing not just a career, but an opportunity to drive real societal change?

What if he could attract the types of people who often leave the industry because it cant seem to cater for anything but the mainstream?

The strategy

As a gay Muslim man, Asad knew what it felt like to feel different, working in an industry that would enthusiastically talk the talk, but usually fail to walk the walk. He wanted to nurture an environment where clients could learn and people could thrive. And so, following a round of seed investment, The Unmistakables was born in September 2018.

The mission is simple: to help organisations become more representative of society from the inside out. Rather than treating diversity as a box-ticking exercise, this cultural consultancy focuses on getting to the root of the issue and working with organisation leaders to transform how they operate. Its uniqueness comes in its unrelenting ambition to use the power of marketing and communications to go deeper within organisations in order to drive meaningful change. Its work comes from CEOs, learning development directors, and marketing and communications leaders.

The action

This approach led to significant growth in year one, with clients including Unilever, the England Cricket Board, Barnardos and Openreach. The work the consultancy does has been described as transformative, and it is slowly carving out a niche to help brands and organisations that want to walk the walk, rather than talk the talk when it comes to diversity & inclusion.

The initiatives The Unmistakables undertakes, from its morning Minoritease news updates, to its thought leading Stereotypes Report also lead the way on pushing for a better understanding of minority groups, and are having a world-changing impact on the industry by making people think differently.

The results

In less than 12 months since launching, The Unmistakables has grown from a kitchen table to an office of six people, all different in their own way. The agency is on track for 350K in revenue, and has worked with household brands including the England Cricket Board, Barnardos, Openreach and Unilever.

It has also worked with start-ups from diverse backgrounds, helping the likes of LGBT+ app Squad Social, Proud Beer and Yogarise in articulating their proposition and messaging. Asad has also been invited to speak around the world spreading The Unmistakables message at the IDEA Summit in Toronto, at Media360 in Brighton, at Ad:Tech in London, and most recently at the International Festival of Creativity in Cannes. Its presence has extended beyond speaking engagements, with media coverage about The Unmistakables appearing on Euronews, BBC News, Holmes Report, and multiple times in The Drum.

We decided to go with The Unmistakables because their mission statement to create an agency which reflects the world in all its varied forms means, by its nature, they re-think things from first principles. This fully reflects the way that we work, avoiding assumptions and carefully considering what might be the best approach for a given project or situation. Its a pleasure to work together. - Simon Thorpe of Market Peckham

The Unmistakables was a winner at The Drum Social Purpose Awards 2019. Click here to register you interest in next years awards.

More:
Why The Unmistakables represents a 'first principles' approach to diversity and inclusion - The Drum

Google limits political ad targeting, Facebook announces brand ‘safety controls,’ and Taco Bell enters the ‘chicken wars’ – PR Daily – PR Daily

Good morning, PR pros:

Taco Bell has entered the chicken coop.

The fast-food chain is debuting its Crispy Tortilla Chicken, which are chicken tenders marinated in jalapeo-buttermilk flavoring and tossed in a tortilla-chip coating. The tenders are offered both inside a taco and alongside dipping sauce, but only in its Houston and Dayton, Ohio locations. Taco Bell said the menu item will expand to all U.S. locations in 2020.

The move is an attempt by Taco Bell to wrestle with competitors such as Popeyes, Wendys and Chick-fil-A. More and more fast-food chains are clucking at the chance to get a piece of Popeyes continuing viral fame as consumers clamor for chicken sandwiches and beyond.

Here are todays top stories:

Google announced several ways its limiting targeting of political ads, along with ways its going to increase transparency and cut down on misinformation ahead of elections in the United States, United Kingdom and beyond.

Googles vice president of product management for Google Ads, Scott Spencer, wrote in a blog post:

Whether youre running for office or selling office furniture, we apply the same ads policies to everyone; there are no carve-outs. Its against our policies for any advertiser to make a false claimwhether its a claim about the price of a chair or a claim that you can vote by text message, that election day is postponed, or that a candidate has died.

Along with clarifying its ads policies to highlight prohibited content and messages, Google will limit targeting options for political ads to age, gender and location categories. It also is adding to its transparency report and in-ad disclosures U.S. state-level candidates and officeholders, ballot measures, and ads that mention federal or state political parties.

We want the ads we serve to be transparent and widely available so that many voices can debate issues openly, Spencer wrote.

Why it matters: Googles announcement follows Twitters decision to ban political ads, as pressure on social media and search platforms grows to limit fake news and misleading content. The new policies can affect communicators outside of the political spectrum, such as nonprofits and government agencies that will have to be more careful with their content. PR, marketing and social media pros should also take this as a reminder of their responsibility to fight fake news and increase both transparency and trust within stakeholder communications and relationships.

Many leaders talk about transformational change, but how many actually achieve it? Accentures Stacey Jones shares her tips for how a global consulting group was able to reform its communications with a few guiding principles.

The piece is the latest in our How We Did It series, in partnership with the Institute of Public Relations.

How are you bringing change to your organization and team? Share what you think are the most important elements in making a lasting impact on your workplace with our hashtag #MorningScoop.

According to a study from MBLM, brands that can tap into consumer emotion outperform national indices like the Fortune 500 and S&P Global.

The report breaks down brand intimacy by measuring factors that draw consumers to a brand identity. The report also breaks down which brands are most attractive to different genders.

How are you working to make your brand more meaningful for your audience? Learn more about brand intimacy by reading the full report.

The social media platform announced measures that will enable brand managers to select where their ads appear before they go live and increase transparency on where their content resides. These features include block lists to exclude content creators and channels, improved delivery reports and a white-listing tool for types of content.

In a post on its business blog, Facebook wrote:

While we have zero tolerance for harmful content on our platforms, we recognize that doesnt mean zero occurrence. Its why we are tackling this challenge across the company working with industry, enlisting expertise across subject matters, and continuing to invest in the technology, tools and advancements that advertisers are asking for. A safer Facebook and Instagram is better for everyone, including businesses, and its what well keep working towards.

Why you should care: Facebook and other social media platforms arent just struggling to respond to increased pressure regarding misinformation across their websitestheyre also grappling with user growth while courting marketers. Just as consumers can vote with their wallets to effectively sway organizations to adopt stances and policies they want, so too can brand managers push Facebook to adopt better content policies, safety features and advertising transparency. Catering to marketers increases Facebooks revenue, but by elevating content guidelines and cracking down on misinformation and other controversial content, Facebook can also increase trust among its userswhich include fans of your Facebook page(s).

Twitter is testing a scheduling feature within its platform that enables you to schedule tweets directly from the tweet composition window:

Tweet scheduling on https://t.co/8FModRv1sl? Yes please! Starting today, were experimenting with bringing one of @TweetDecks handiest time-saving features into Twitter. Tell us what you think if youre part of the experiment. pic.twitter.com/4pI9xrbPEP

TweetDeck (@TweetDeck) November 20, 2019

The experiment is open to a select number of Twitter users, but the social media platform didnt say how many users have access to it. If Twitter expands the feature to all users, communicators wouldnt have to schedule tweets through a third-party social media platform such as Buffer, SproutSocial or Tweetdeck.

The feature might entice more brand managers to use Twitter (or increase their activity on the platform). It could also help communicators choose social listening tools and create dashboards, if scheduled tweets dont have to be part of the service.

We asked for your biggest challenge when working on media relations campaigns and other buzz-building efforts, and 41% of you said landing pitches with journalists remains the top hurdle. Showing that media coverage produced ROI comes in at a close second (38%), with 12% of you struggling with finding news for stories and pitches.

What's your biggest challenge with media relations and increasing your organization's buzz?

Share your insights with us under #MorningScoop, and we'll share in tomorrow's roundup.

PR Daily (@PRDaily) November 20, 2019

As newsrooms continue to shrink, communicators can break through with savvy storytelling efforts and targeted, interesting pitches.

Where are you increasing your focus in the year to comeand in your budget?

Where are you increasing your focus (and budget) in the year to come?

Share your insights under the #MorningScoop hashtag. We want to hear your thoughts!

PR Daily (@PRDaily) November 21, 2019

Weigh in and share your thoughts under the hashtag #MorningScoop and well share in tomorrows roundup.

Topics: Brand Journalism, Content Marketing, Crisis Communications, Executive Communication, Leadership Communications, Morning Scoop, PR Industry, Social Media, Storytelling, The Workplace, Writing & Editing

COMMENT

I love Google but I fear for their continued freedom to serve us.

I love Google not only for the obviousthe convenience of all that information available instantly and freebut also because Google is a marvelous way to get the TRUTH.

It used to be that we could rely for the truth on newspapers and TV that told both sides, but many media are increasingly slanted to favor leftist or rightist positions. Yet Google tells it like it is with no political slant so we can trust Google for the truth.

Unfortunately for Google and for us, newspapers and broadcasters that have lost billions in ad dollars to Google may be menacingly influential in Washington. So the older media would love Washington to pass laws that reduce Googles value to usand reduce Googles ability to win more and more ad dollars away from newspapers and TV.

Googles latest move to reduce fraudulent advertising may be intended not only to protect us, the readers, but also to protect Google againstWashington laws to purportedly protect the public but actually toprotect newspapers and TV against loss of still more ad dollars to Google.

But poor Google! Look what they are doing and and what they COULD be doing to protect their freedom to publish and our freedom to have the convenience and the truth Google gives us.

WHAT GOOGLE IS DOINGand its such an easy PR blunder to makeis to rely on reducing the complaints old media can make that ads on Google are unfair discrimination because advertisers can go after (and only pay for) one gender but not the other, people in rich areas but not in poorer areas.

THE DANGER TO GOOGLE AND TO US is that political leaders, eager to win favor of newspapers and TV stations that can make or break political leaders, will pass laws seemingly to protect against such discrimination. But the EFFECT of such regulation can be to reduce advertising in Google leaving more ad dollars for newspapers and TV.

WHAT GOOGLE IS NOT DOINGat least not yetis to back some hugepublic service project like a billion dollar anti-cancer program with a cancer center like Americas Memorial Sloan Kettering so perhaps 100 million Americans will think God bless Google.

Whom God hath joined together, wedding ceremonies recite, let no man put asunder. Whom God hath been asked by millions to bless, PR wisdom tells us, no Washington political leaders may be inclined to damage. Truth is a good weapon and Google is using it. But the publics self-interest is also a good weapon. Adding it can reduce the peril that Google and billions in ad dollars will be put asunder.

Read the rest here:
Google limits political ad targeting, Facebook announces brand 'safety controls,' and Taco Bell enters the 'chicken wars' - PR Daily - PR Daily

Commentary: It looks glamorous and fun, but most social media influencers are like unpaid interns – CNA

MELBOURNE: Like any eight-year-old, Ryan Kaji loves to play with toys. But when Ryan plays, millions watch.

Since the age of four hes been the star of his own YouTube channel. All up his videos have gained more than 35 billion views. This helped make him YouTubes highest-earning star in 2018, earning US$22 million, according to Forbes.

Thats more than actor Jake Paul (US$21 million), the trick-shot sports crew Dude Perfect (US$20 million), Minecraft player DanTDM (US$18.5 million) and make-up artist Jeffree Star (US$18 million).

Ryan is apparently living the dream of many kids and adults.

According to a Harris Poll/LEGO survey covering the United States, Britain and China, 29 per cent of children aged eight to 12 want to be a YouTuber. Thats three times as many as those who want to be astronauts.

Other polls suggest an even higher percentage of teenagers aspire to fame and fortune via YouTube or another social media platform. An eye-grabbing news report out this month suggested a whopping 54 per centof Americans aged 13 to 38 would become an influencer given the chance, with 12 per cent already considering themselves influencers.

These numbers might be questioned, but given the apparent fortunes to be made by goofing around, playing games, applying makeup or unboxing toys, its no surprise so many are besotted with the influencer dream.

But theres a stark divide between the glossy faade and reality of this new industry. The fact is most wannabe influencers have as much a chance of walking on the Moon as they do of emulating Ryan Kaji.

Theyll be lucky, in fact, to earn as much as someone working at fast-food joint.

MARKETINGS NEW FOOT SOLDIERS

Marketing literature defines an influencer as someone with a large following on a social media platform, primarily YouTube and Instagram.

As people consume less traditional media and spend more time on social platforms, advertisers are increasingly using these influencers to spruik their products.

A mega-influencer like Kylie Jenner, with 139 million followers on Instagram, can reportedly charge more than US$1 milllion for a single promotional post.

In 2017 an estimated US$570 million was spent globally on influencer marketing. In 2020, according to the World Advertising Research Center, it will be between US$5 billion and US$10 billion.

A key driver of this booming market is that about half of consumers use ad-blocking technology, which limits the reach of traditional advertising.

KEEPING UP APPEARANCES

One company to really embrace the social influencer trend is cosmetics giant Estee Lauder. In August the companys chief executive, Fabrizio Freda, said 75 per cent of its advertising budget was now going to social media influencers, and theyre revealing to be highly productive.

But while part of the companys budget is going to micro-influencers those with fewer than 10,000 followers its likely the bulk is still wrapped up in deals with big-name spokesmodels and brand ambassadors like Karlie Kloss, Grace Elizabeth, Fei Fei Sun, Anok Yai and Kendall Jenner.

In a sense these celebrity deals arent much different to what the cosmetics company has done for decades with the likes of Gwyneth Paltrow, Elisabeth Hurley and Karen Graham.

UNPAID INTERNSHIPS

So far most of the indications are that the new economics of influencer marketing are not too different to the old economics of marketing.

As in the acting, modelling or music industry, theres a tiny A-list of superstar influencers making millions.

Then theres a somewhat larger B-list making a handsome living. But the vast bulk of influencers would be better off getting an ordinary job.

In 2018 a professor at the Offenburg University of Applied Sciences in Germany, Mathias Brtl, published a statistical analysis of YouTube channels, uploads and views over a decade.

His results showed that 85 per cent of traffic went to just 3 per cent of channels, and that 96.5 per cent of YouTubers wouldnt make enough money to reach the US federal poverty line (US$12,140).

Cornell University associate professor Brooke Erin Duffy suggests the lure of being a social influencer is part of a larger myth about the digital economy providing the opportunity for fulfilment, fame and fortune in doing what you love through developing your personal brand.

This is a particularly problematic illusion for young women, Duffy writes in her 2017 book (Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Love.

The tales of achievement, she says, should not obscure the reality.

Rather than a satisfying career, what most have is an unpaid internship.

Natalya Saldanha is an academic at RMIT University. This commentary first appeared in The Conversation.

See more here:
Commentary: It looks glamorous and fun, but most social media influencers are like unpaid interns - CNA

Can GoPro Reinvent Itself… By Going Back to Its Past? – Entrepreneur

The action-camera company grew fast, and crashed hard. Now it's trying to pick itself back up -- by thinking a lot smaller.

November21, 201915+ min read

This story appears in the December 2019 issue ofEntrepreneur. Subscribe

This past August, 40 influencers from 19 countries left their homes with camera in hand. Their mission: Film themselves from the moment they stepped out the door, onward to the airport, and en route to the remote Western Australia town of Broome. Theyd charge into the ocean, do bike flips, and ride camels on the beach. And then theyd race to stitch the footage together into a montage and submit it for a contest by 11:59 p.m.

The next morning, the influencers are surprisingly bright-eyed, sitting in a conference room, waiting to learn who made the best video. I know you guys are curious to know who got the award, says Devon DiPietro, head of community at the action-camera company GoPro, which organized the event. But there were so many good submissions that were not ready to announce it yet.

The influencers nod. They know theyre good. So does GoPro, which is why the company spent a lot of money bringing them here. With any luck, the influencers will now help the company make a lot of money.

Related:With Girlboss, Sophia Amoruso Is Using Past Failures to Fuel Her Latest Success

This big bash in Broome is what GoPro calls its Creator Summit, and its the pinnacle event in an ongoing effort to fix its business. GoPro never had trouble with exposure -- the brands name is synonymous with first-person action footage. But its had an on-and-off relationship with profitability. In 2014, its stock topped out at $93.85. Then the company stumbled, and it lost more than $700 million between 2016 and 2019. This year, its stock price dipped below $3.50. If youd invested $10,000 at GoPros peak, you wouldnt have enough cash to buy its flagship camera. (It goes for about $400.)

Now GoPro is going through the same process countless companies do at every stage of business: Its rethinking exactly who its target audience is -- and how to appeal to them. Thats why, over the next four days, the influencers GoPro has brought to Australia will ride boats and Jet Skis, snorkel through a flooded mangrove forest, and swim with sharks. Theyll take mud baths, buzz the coastline in floatplanes, and document a schedule of activities GoPro believes its core users thirst for. The company foots the bill and has put up an additional $10,000 in prize money to reward these influencers during an array of challenges. In return, the creators will post 566 times, generating 30 million impressions and 1.8 million social engagements.

Will that generate revenue? It just might. Youre seeing a real turnaround in their core business, says Andrew Uerkwitz, a senior tech analyst at Oppenheimer & Co. Theyre actually going to turn a profit this year.

But first, the influencers need their validation. A little later this first morning, DiPietro finally announces who made the best video. Congratulations, Nick Pescetto! she says.

Pescetto, an Italian influencer with gorgeous sun-fried dreadlocks and a quarter-million social-media followers, steps up to accept his award. With one hand, he shakes DiPietros hand. With the other, he holds a GoPro, rotating it between his own grinning face and the applause of his peers.

Image Credit: @davidoc by @chrisrogers

Everybody likes to see the champ fall from grace, says GoPro founder and CEO Nick Woodman. Its We love you! We love you! And then you slip up and theyre on you with daggers, stabbing you to death.

If its not immediately clear, GoPro is the Julius in this allegory. Before the brands assassination, it was widely held up as a shining example of entrepreneurial glory.

The origin story is well-told. In 2002, during a five-month surfing trip through Australia and Indonesia, Woodman, then 26, began fidgeting with a strap that would allow him to rig a waterproof camera to his wrist. If he could document his time in the barrel -- what surfers call the inside of a wave -- it might help him go pro. (Get it?) So he raised some money from his parents, put in $30,000 of his own savings, created a 35-millimeter camera with a strap on it, and sold his first unit in 2004 for $19.99.

A natural salesman, Woodman drove up and down the coast, pitching his camera to surf and skate shops. They understood the appeal. Before GoPro, unless you had a photographer following you around, nobody had footage of themselves doing anything active, says Woodman. It was always the before and after photos in the parking lot. Growth was steady, thanks to trade shows and athletes using the cameras, but the real pop came in 2006 when GoPro launched its first digital camera. Sales topped $800,000. As the cameras improved in functionality, so did profits. In late 2009, it sold a camera called the HD Hero that brought in$64 million over the course of 2010.

The following year, GoPro raised $88 million in venture funding and was valued at $400 million. When it went public in 2014, it had 25,000 specialty retail accounts. Those were the good days, says Todd Ballard, GoPros chief marketing officer. It felt like everything we touched turned to gold.

In truth, it was a lot of fools gold.

In the companys IPO documents, GoPro acknowledged that virtually all of its revenue came from selling cameras and accessories -- but instead of calling itself a consumer electronics company, it claimed that it could become an exciting new media company. It had secured Xbox and Virgin America as distribution partners, and it was working on original content that it hoped to monetize with advertising, sponsorships, and increased camera sales.

People were like, Damn! Thats a great idea! says Uerkwitz. It got GoPro a lot of attention. GoPro declines to reveal specifics on how much it spent on its media division, but it was a pretty big spend, says Woodman. We had a very large team of filmers and editors, including sports, lifestyle, and reality-style scripted divisions. The year before the company went public, GoPros operating expenses were $263 million. In 2016, it spent $835 million -- three times as much. But no serious content was released with any regularity. The project flopped.

Meanwhile, as part of a growth promise to investors, GoPro launched entry-level cameras designed to steal market share from point-and-shoots and DSLRs. We started getting greedy as an organization, says Ballard. It drove us to think, How do we get soccer moms to buy our cameras? How do we get everybody to buy our cameras?

Related:How This Ex-Con Started From Nothing to Build a 7-Figure Business

Thats not to say this is an inherently bad strategy. Companies need to grow, which can mean expanding their audience. In books and podcasts, LinkedIn cofounder Reid Hoffman advises founders to ignore the needs of their early, core customers in favor of appealing to their future scale customers. And when the extreme racing company Tough Mudder looked to expand its offerings, appealing beyond its hard-core base to attract everyday athletes, it approached the project carefully -- but determinedly. What I didnt want to be seen doing was somehow diluting the brand, says Tough Mudder cofounder and former CEO Will Dean. So he acted slowly, introducing new, easier races at the same time he introduced harder, more extreme races. For inspiration, Dean turned to a Harvard Business Review case study on Porsche, which went through this same issue. In 2003, Porsche launched the midpriced Cayenne SUV to attract its own soccer moms, and some high-end drivers got grumpy. Porsche had to convince its core fans that the brand would still deliver on their expectations of exclusivity --which it did in part by taking some of its earnings from the SUV and investing it in making new, expensive sports cars.

But GoPro wasnt as delicate. Scroll back far enough in the companys Instagram feed and youll find evidence of how it approached its mass-market effort --through photos of sunsets, sleeping cats, and babies eating cookies. None of this attracted the soccer moms, but it did push GoPros core user away. Even Woodman lost interest. I stopped paying attention to our own Instagram feed and YouTube channel, he says. I thought they were lame. If youre a 22-year-old whos really getting after it and youre seeing this type of marketing, youre like, Is this my brand?

In 2016, GoPro released a $1,099 drone called the Karma, but it was bedeviled by reports of battery problems and crashes. It seemed like a metaphor.

Image Credit: @josh_neuman1

The GoPro decline came fast. It laid off 450 people in 2016. Rumors swirled that the founder and CEO was unable to carry his company. There was a period where it really bothered me, he says about the headlines. It was like, Can you guys get off it now?

But GoPro had a reason for hope. Even as it bled cash, it still owned the action-camera market. Since going public, the company has sold at least 4.3 million cameras annually. No other company has come close. Sony tried and failed, Garmin tried and failed, Xiaomi tried and failed -- and those three companies are all much larger than GoPro, says Uerkwitz. (Today, GoPro captures roughly 95 of every 100 dollars spent on action cameras in the U.S.)

So it kept developing cameras. In the spring of 2018, it was preparing to launch a new one called the Hero7 Black. This camera would improve upon previous editions with a seemingly magic feature that turns shaky camera footage -- the kind you get by mounting a camera to a surfboard or a helmet -- into a buttery-smooth motion picture. It was an impressive technological leap, but when Woodman reviewed the proposed marketing, he hated it. It was super safe and boring, he says.

Chasing the mass market was threatening GoPros identity. It had been ignoring its core customers in favor of what LinkedIns Hoffman would call scale customers -- but what if its extreme sports users actually were its scale customers? Thats when Woodman had an epiphany. Nick was like: Dude, were not doing this anymore, says Ballard. We need to go back to what we stand for. The company wouldnt be about appealing to broad audiences or making so much of its own content. It would be about enabling the most adventurous people on the planet to capture -- and share! -- their own accomplishments. It would double down on them.

Back in 2015, GoPro had launched an awards program that encouraged users to submit videos and photos for a chance to earn up to $5,000. GoPro then used the best stuff in its marketing and social media. The strategy was more cost-effective than paying an in-house media team to capture footage all over the world. But more important, it created a community of travelers, producers, and athletes who began to see GoPro as another way to make money doing what they love. Since its launch, the awards program had paid out roughly $3 million, and now supplies roughly 70 percent of GoPro posts on social media.

Related:How This Family Rebuilt Their Business After Devastating Losses

The users who submit to the awards program make up what Woodman calls the tip-of-spear consumers -- the people going into surf and skate shops 10 years ago. These were the people Woodman wanted to reengage. So he told his staff to rethink the creative launch of the Hero7, as well as everything that came after it. That was a pivotal time, says Ballard. We needed to hear that from him.

Prior to this revelation, GoPros most recent camera was launched with a nearly five-minute marketing video opening on a couple running hand-in-hand through a park. The cameras technology was not discussed.

By contrast, under Woodmans new (but old!) direction, the fall 2018 launch of the Hero7 featured fast music and quick cuts. Users received a full technology rundown in two minutes: stabilization, voice-command features, the ability to speed up and slow down footage. You see a rocket blasting away from Earth and motorbikes hitting dirt jumps while graphics like HDR and 1080p240 flash across the screen.

The marketing campaign was coupled with GoPros biggest award incentive yet -- a million-dollar challenge that produced one superhot sizzle reel shot entirely on the Hero7. From 25,000 customer submissions, GoPro chose 56 award recipients, and the average payout was just under $18,000.

During its first week on sale, the Hero7 became the fastest-selling GoPro ever. In the first half of 2019, the company earned 2.2 million new social media followers, a 41 percent increase compared with the first half of 2018. In June, GoPros YouTube channel set a single-month record with 46 million unique views.

Woodman was right. Now it was time to dig in deeper. The company invested more heavily in an insights-and-analytics team -- which, unlike before, could now explore the needs of its narrowly focused users. GoPro was going to learn exactly what they wanted. And then it would do whatever it could to please themincluding taking 40 of them to Australia.

Image Credit: @fredfalco

The Australia trip is an influencers dream -- the camera equipment, the beach, two pools, a yoga studio. Between the on-camera explorations, GoPro hosts breakout sessions on Photoshop, video editing, and personal branding. And then, on the last day of the summit, the group is brought together inside a coffee shop, in front of a deli case with a crocodiles head inside. For the first time in days, theyre told to turn off their cameras. In advance of this moment, theyve all signed NDAs.

This is GoPros big payoff for the trip. Its about to reveal two new cameras: the next-level Hero8 Black and the 360-degree Max.

The Hero8 is a nod to everyone here, says Jeremy Hendricks, a GoPro senior product marketing manager. Its a nod to the pros.

At first, the new camera looks just like the old one. Its a black box. But then Hendricks unfolds a pair of concealed tabs, which extend from the bottom of the camera like stumpy legs.

Related:How to Maintain a Professional Relationship After a Business Partnership Falls Through

The influencers immediately understand. With previous GoPros, in order to clip the camera to a helmet mount or extendable selfie stick, users had to first snap it into a finicky plastic frame, which had tabs on the bottom. But now, with the Hero8 update, these tabs will be built directly into the camera -- there when you need them, hidden when you dont. You guys! says Hendricks. No more frames!

Hendricks is confident in his delivery, because those flip-out tabs solve for a pain point specifically identified by GoPros insights and analytics teams. The influencers erupt.

Folding fingers! says Tim Humphreys, a pro snowboarder. Keep talking dirty to us!

GoPro sure will, because when people like Humphreys love GoPro, more seem to follow. After three years of losses, the company is expecting 6 to 9 percent growth in 2019. But it still has a lot of work to do. Core users are once again sweet on the brand, but investors are still sour. After a second-quarter earnings call during which the company reported international growth, margin growth, and a million new social media followers, GoPros stock price actually dropped.

You have to remember that there were multiple years of mis-execution, and investors got burned, says Nikolay Todorov, an analyst at Longbow Research. These guys have done quite a good job at stabilizing the ship. But its going to take some time for investor sentiment to shift.

The stock recovered, but then in October it dropped again -- this time 20 percent -- when GoPro reported a late-stage production delay on the Hero8. The camera was originally slated to launch in the third quarter but instead was bumped to the fourth. Thats crippling for a company that pins almost all its success to one flagship product --and indicates that despite all the lessons GoPro has learned in the past few years, its still got work to do.

What investors want in a consumer electronics company, according to Uerkwitz, is a deeper bench. Garmin, Apple, Logitech: They all have diverse product portfolios. But GoPros previous efforts to diversify crash-landed (sometimes literally). So what the company needs to do is hold the line, hit its targets, and wait for investors to come around.

Woodman understands this. Weve got to deliver consistent profitability and growth, he says. GoPro has more than three years of product launches mapped out, and its immediate goal is to simply continue blowing the minds of its core users. Then, who knows? If we identify a big enough market opportunity, absolutely well go and build additional hardware, says Woodman. He takes a pause. But youve got to be really careful that you dont spread yourself too thin.

So for now, GoPro just wants to geek out. Back in Australia, Hendricks walks the influencers through a suite of modular accessories that will snap onto the Hero8 to provide lighting, a shotgun microphone, and a rotating screen that allows vloggers to see themselves talking into the camera. He shows off its new stabilization capabilities, HDR upgrades, and functionality that allows users to speed up and slow down footage on the fly. The influencers ask questions and speculate about the creative ways theyll deploy the new features. And when the presentation is done, they exit the coffee shop and walk right onto the hovercraft --a literal hovercraft --waiting for them outside.

They turn their cameras back on. Everyone has work to do.

Read the original post:
Can GoPro Reinvent Itself... By Going Back to Its Past? - Entrepreneur