Archive for the ‘Republicans’ Category

With no allies, Republicans step away from precipice of repeal – Washington Post (blog)

As they struggle to figure out how to deliver on the most important (and repeated) promise they made to their constituents over the last eight years repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act Republicans face two sets of problems, both of which are far thornier than they imagined.

The first are the policy problems, which arise from the fact that health care reform is incredibly complex (and yes, theyre just realizing that now). The second are the political problems, which may be even more challenging. And their political task is going to become much harder when they actually propose something and try to get it through Congress, for a reason few seem to have noticed: Republicans are totally alone.

Health care reform, more than perhaps any other issue, implicates and potentially threatens the interests of a wide array of constituencies, groups, industries, and political actors. Youve got citizens/patients/consumers, of course. Then there are the doctors, and the hospitals, and the insurers, and the various health care industries industries, and patient advocacy groups, and even larger groups like the AARP. After all, were talking about a sector that employs over 12 million Americans, makes up 18 percent of the entire American economy, and touches absolutely everyones life. If you get opposition from even some of those interests, the whole effort can begin to crumble.

Thats why, when Democrats set out to construct the ACA in 2009, they spent an enormous amount of time and effort trying to co-opt as many of those groups as they could, often to the consternation of liberals. It was a tricky balancing act: some got on board wholeheartedly, some maintained opposition, and some, like the insurance industry, seemed to toggle between support and opposition on an almost daily basis. They had to be cajoled, convinced, threatened, and bought off.

But in the end, it worked. Democrats got the support of the American Medical Association, which had opposed just about every health reform effort in history, including the creation of Medicare. They convinced insurers that the new regulations theyd be subject to would be made up for by an infusion of new customers. In the end they held this tenuous coalition together just long enough to get the 60 votes they needed to pass the bill through the Senate, without a single vote to spare.

But who is with Republicans right now in their effort to repeal the ACA? Who has their back? The answer is: nobody. Hospitals are terrified that repeal will mean a flood of patients unable to pay their bills. The AMA is telling them not to do repeal without a replacement plan fully in place. Insurers are starting to panic, threatening to pull out of the individual market next year. The AARP, the most powerful lobby in America, is issuing warnings about GOP replacement plans that could increase costs for middle-aged consumers. Employers who may not have liked the law in the first place are nervous about the upheaval repeal will cause. Even the reliably pro-GOP U.S. Chamber of Commerce is telling them to slow down.

While this is happening, much of the grassroots energy is on the Democratic side. There are crowds of angry constituents hounding their representatives not to repeal the law, but the pressure on the other side seems less visible.

And if they push ahead and repeal the law, all the bad effects will happen just in time for the 2018 midterm elections. Which is why Republicans are getting ready to cast off the very idea of repealing the ACA, the thing they voted 60 times in the House to do and have promised again and again. Heres what the New York Times reports today:

Congresss rush to dismantle the Affordable Care Act, once seemingly unstoppable, is flagging badly as Republicans struggle to come up with a replacement and a key senator has declared that the effort is more a repair job than a demolition.

It is more accurate to say repair Obamacare, Senator Lamar Alexander, Republican of Tennessee and chairman of the Senate health committee, said this week. We can repair the individual market, and that is a good place to start.

Orrin Hatch, who chairs the Senate Finance Committee (the other place the reform effort has to run through), told the Post that he is okay with either repealing or repairing the law. Hatch said:Im saying Im open to anything. Anything that will improve the system, Im for.

This is absolute blasphemy but its spreading. The dramatic shift in language comes after their retreat in Philadelphia last week, in which they fretted about the political and policy difficulties in repealing the law, and were told by pollster Frank Luntz that they should use the word repair when talking about what they plan to do.

Which is why youre suddenly hearing the word repair come out of Republicans mouths every time this subject comes up. Repeal is out, repair is in. Yes, there are still Tea Party members insisting that the whole law needs to be tossed as quickly as possible. But theyre being overtaken by the repair contingent, as Republicans realize not only that full-scale repeal would be catastrophic for the health care system, but that if they do it, there will be no one to help them with the political fallout. Despite the fact that pretty much all Republicans have promised for years to repeal the ACA, its possible that, if they brought up a repeal bill tomorrow, all those interest groups would quickly mobilize against them, frightened members would begin to peel away, and the measure would fail.

There may be one silver lining for Republicans in this extended debate. As there has been a public discussion of the consequences of repeal, the law has been getting more popular, with more Americans approving of it than disapproving of it. I wouldnt be surprised if even some Republican voters who a few months ago would have said Trash the whole thing! are now perfectly amenable to a more careful approach. That may give Republicans some room to take things slow without paying too much of a price with their base.

But theyll still be responsible for the damage they cause to peoples coverage when its all done. Even if they manage to hold on to many of the ACAs more popular provisions, the things they want to do are inevitably going to decrease Americans health security, raise their out-of-pocket costs, and increase the number of uninsured. They wont escape the political consequences of all that, no matter who if anyone winds up on their side.

Donald Trump has campaigned to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as Obamacare, once he gets into office. Now that he's won the presidency with a majority Republican House and Senate, that feat might not prove to be too easy. Wonkblog's Max Ehrenfreund explains. (Daron Taylor/The Washington Post)

View original post here:
With no allies, Republicans step away from precipice of repeal - Washington Post (blog)

Republicans To Overturn Coal Regulations Protecting Streams – Patch.com


Patch.com
Republicans To Overturn Coal Regulations Protecting Streams
Patch.com
Republican legislators also voted to repeal regulations requiring companies involved in drilling and mining to report payments made to foreign governments. And just around the time Ryan was signing the resolution overturning the stream protection rule, ...
Republicans Move to Block Rule on Coal Mining Near StreamsNew York Times
House Republicans move to scrap Obama rule on gun background checksFox News
Republicans Launch Push to Undo Several of Obama's Federal RegulationsWall Street Journal
Washington Times -Reuters -Office of Surface Mining
all 264 news articles »

See more here:
Republicans To Overturn Coal Regulations Protecting Streams - Patch.com

Republicans ax disclosure, emissions rules on energy – Grand Forks Herald

In a 52-47 vote, the Republican-controlled Senate approved a resolution to eradicate a rule requiring companies such as Exxon Mobil and Chevron Corp. to publicly state taxes and other fees paid to foreign governments like Russia.

The House of Representatives already passed the measure. President Donald Trump is expected to sign it within days. On Thursday, the Senate repealed a rule that would have limited coal companies from dumping waste into streams.

After a number of legal battles, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in June 2016 completed the regulation, which supporters said could help expose questionable financial ties U.S. companies may have with foreign governments.

Senate Democrats raised concerns that Exxon's chief executive during those legal fights was Rex Tillerson, who was recently confirmed as U.S. secretary of state and has worked extensively in Russia.

"It should be lost on no one that in less than 48 hours, the Republican-controlled Senate has confirmed the former head of ExxonMobil to serve as our secretary of state, and repealed a key anti-corruption rule that Exxon Mobil and the American Petroleum Institute have erroneously fought for years," Sen. Ben Cardin of Maryland said, referring to the oil industry's trade group.

Exxon and other major energy corporations fought for years to block the rule, required by the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law.

Cardin, the senior Democrat on the foreign relations committee, wrote the Dodd-Frank section on the payments to foreign governments with Richard Lugar, a former Republican senator.

Critics of the rule said it duplicated existing regulations, was too costly and burdensome for companies to implement and that it put U.S. companies at a competitive disadvantage with state-owned companies in other countries that do not have to divulge such information.

The change could give American companies an edge over Canadian and European companies that face some of the toughest transparency rules in the world.

Republicans have taken advantage of a seldom-used law known as the Congressional Review Act to overturn recently enacted rules with simple majorities in both chambers, denying senators the opportunity to filibuster and stall a vote.

Democrats said Republicans were using the review act to help companies not the public.

"When it comes to giving public resources to private interests and gutting our nation's health, environmental and financial standards, the Republicans can't seem to act fast enough," said Rep. Raul Grijalva. "Whoever they're doing this for, it isn't the American public."

Excerpt from:
Republicans ax disclosure, emissions rules on energy - Grand Forks Herald

Which Country Is America’s Strongest Ally? For Republicans, It’s Australia – New York Times

Which Country Is America's Strongest Ally? For Republicans, It's Australia
New York Times
Comparing the new survey with a nearly identical YouGov survey conducted about three years ago, the scatterplot below shows the shifting in Democratic and Republican views. In the previous survey, for example, Democratic and Republican views on ...

Go here to read the rest:
Which Country Is America's Strongest Ally? For Republicans, It's Australia - New York Times

Republicans: You must impeach President Trump – The Week Magazine

Sign Up for

Our free email newsletters

Donald Trump has only been president for two weeks. In that time, he has created untold chaos with hyper-aggressive use of executive authority, and seriously destabilized relations with several nations, including at least one very close ally, Australia. He's unstable, incompetent, and a clear and present danger to the security of the United States and the world.

Donald Trump must be impeached and removed from office. Not because his policy is bad, though that is very true, but because he is so erratic and unstable as to be a threat to all life on Earth. And it will be up to Congressional Republicans to do it.

They are the only ones with the power to impeach Trump at this point (which requires a majority vote in the House to impeach and a two-thirds vote in the Senate to convict and remove from office). The reason they should is not to advance liberal political goals if anything Vice President Mike Pence would be a more effective policymaker and a more formidable candidate in 2020 but because of Trump's actual danger to American society.

Let's roll the tape.

Trump, on the close counsel of Stephen Bannon and Stephen Miller (who are, it seems, the real power behind the throne), has rammed through a probably illegal order banning Muslim immigration from seven countries, even for people with legitimate visas and desperately ill refugees; he reportedly directed federal law enforcement to ignore federal court orders staying the act, creating an instant constitutional crisis. Over the weekend, Trump and his national security team ordered a raid in Yemen which was epically botched, killing at least 30 people including one U.S. soldier and 10 women and children among them an 8-year-old American girl.

This week, Trump reportedly threatened to invade Mexico to deal with "bad hombres" (though the constantly bullied Mexican government later denied it); and he got in a bizarre, heated argument with Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull over an agreement to take in some refugees. On Wednesday night, after a handful of anti-fascist protesters disrupted a Milo Yiannopolous event at the University of California, Berkeley, Trump threatened to withdraw all federal funding from the entire school:

On Thursday, Trump put Iran "ON NOTICE" because they carried out a ballistic missile test. That same day, it came out that Trump had hired Michael Anton, author of a widely-read pseudonymous essay supporting Trump, to work in national security. His article is overtly racist and authoritarian in its reasoning; it casts any Democratic victory as presumptively illegitimate because "the ceaseless importation of Third World foreigners with no tradition of, taste for, or experience in liberty means that the electorate grows more left, more Democratic, less Republican, less republican, and less traditionally American with every cycle."

In related news, Trump is also reportedly considering altering a Department of Homeland Security anti-terrorism program to focus solely on Islamist terrorism mere days after a white nationalist terrorist shot up a mosque in Quebec City. Oh, and Bannon says we'll be at war with China within 10 years.

I wrote many articles predicting that Trump was a racist and an incipient fascist, that he would be the worst president in American history, and on and on. But I did not think it would get quite so bad this fast. If you ever wanted to see a presidency run by an unstable numskull who gets 100 percent of his news from Fox News broadcasts, here we have it.

And all this doesn't even touch the background issue of Trump's immense network of business ties which he was already exploiting for his own enrichment before he was inaugurated. That alone a clear-cut violation of the Emoluments Clause is probably grounds enough for impeachment, if we needed any more.

Trump is popular among Republican voters. But he is very unpopular overall, and his antics are creating a massive popular backlash. And while congressional Republicans are hawkish on Iran, they weren't much for war with China last time I checked. Trump has been president for literally two weeks and he has already caused one major international crisis and several serious diplomatic flaps for no reason at all. What will happen when he faces a real problem? The United States has about 1,900 strategic nuclear warheads that can be fired anywhere on the sole discretion of the president. The man is quite literally a threat to human life on this planet. He has to go.

Here is the original post:
Republicans: You must impeach President Trump - The Week Magazine