Archive for the ‘Republicans’ Category

Special Election Fights Expose House Republicans’ Squabbles With White House – New York Times


New York Times
Special Election Fights Expose House Republicans' Squabbles With White House
New York Times
WASHINGTON The House Republican campaign arm is increasingly at odds with the White House over how best to retain the party's congressional majorities and, more broadly, who is in charge of the midterm campaign effort as Republicans spend ...

View original post here:
Special Election Fights Expose House Republicans' Squabbles With White House - New York Times

Are Republicans going to try to steal the 2018 election? – The Week Magazine

Sign Up for

Our free email newsletters

Republicans are not in good shape for the 2018 midterm elections. The party in general is at 53 percent disapproval in the polling averages, which has been getting steadily worse since the election. Democrats should be in a strong position to make large gains in the midterms, just as they did in 2006.

But that's only assuming there are free and fair elections.

There are already signs that Republicans might try to cheat their way to victory. Exhibit A is Thursday's announcement that the White House is setting up a commission to "investigate" voter fraud in the United States one helmed by the most notorious electoral cheater in the country, Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach.

Cheating is going to be sorely tempting, given the depth of political problems Republicans face the party disapproval rating isn't the half of it. President Trump is only slightly more popular than the party as a whole making him the least popular recently elected president in the history of polling. Only 21 percent approve of the most recent Republican health-care bill, an already paltry number that will drop precipitously if the bill passes and the reality of throwing tens of millions off their insurance sinks in. And the Comey scandal is already tainting the party yet more.

While I have no doubt that the party's base will stick with Trump to the bitter end, even if he airholes a Supreme Court justice during a State of the Union address, there aren't enough of them to win national elections.

Indeed, that's part of the reason Republicans will cheat they likely would not have won the presidency in 2016 without doing so. A non-peer reviewed estimate conducted by a Democratic-aligned organization found that voter suppression reduced voting by 200,000 in Wisconsin alone, where the margin of victory was just under 23,000. A similar study by the Government Accountability Office found voter ID laws cut turnout by over 100,000 votes in Kansas and Tennessee in 2012. Felony disenfranchisement probably won them Florida.

Now, that sort of thing isn't quite the same thing as stealing an election outright.

Electoral fraud exists on a spectrum. On one pole, you have a full-blown dictatorship, where all parties but the ruling one are banned, journalists who criticize the dictator are locked up or killed, and any elections that happen are one-choice affairs where armed secret police look over your shoulder at the voting booth. On the other, you have the scrupulous parliamentary democracy, where citizens are free to vote for any party or form new ones, all adult citizens have the right to vote, electoral mechanics are non-partisan, and there is due process, freedom of the press, assembly, and so forth.

But there are quite a lot of intermediate options in between those two extremes. For one, you can set up voting qualifications to selectively disenfranchise opposition voters. Republicans do this with felony disenfranchisement, voter ID, and other onerous regulations most of them aimed squarely at black people. For another, you can gerrymander district boundaries to make it nearly impossible for the other side to win. Republicans have done this to give themselves a roughly 7-point advantage in the House of Representatives, and to a far greater extent in state legislatures.

There is a difference between a 7-point handicap and an "election" where men with guns tell you how to vote. But gerrymandering, partisan disenfranchisement, and vote suppression are without question an attempt to overturn the will of the people by rigging the electoral system. The fact that it doesn't disenfranchise everyone only makes it somewhat less horrible.

Gerrymandering obviously has to be done by state legislatures. But Kobach is the national champion at vote suppression:

Mr. Kobach has been the driving force behind a Kansas law requiring new voters to produce a passport, a birth certificate, or naturalization papers as proof of citizenship or be denied the ability to cast ballots. He worked last year to disqualify the state and local votes of thousands of people who did not meet the criteria. He has advocated the proof-of-citizenship requirement at the federal level as well, citing rampant voter fraud without producing proof of a widespread problem. [The New York Times]

He produces no proof because there is none. Large studies not to mention an investigation by Kobach himself have found, at most, a tiny handful of cases of possible in-person voter fraud thousands or millions of votes short of actually swinging an election. You steal an election by controlling the count, or by rigging the procedures, not by getting city-sized groups of people to commit serious felonies en masse. It is absolutely beyond question that the motivation here is partisan advantage for Republicans.

Kobach will almost certainly recommend national-level measures to suppress liberal votes, and will enable state-level efforts to roll back democracy as well. Whether there are meaningful elections next year may depend on whether such measures can be stopped.

Go here to read the rest:
Are Republicans going to try to steal the 2018 election? - The Week Magazine

Comey’s Firing May Imperil Republicans’ Legislative Agenda – New York Times


New York Times
Comey's Firing May Imperil Republicans' Legislative Agenda
New York Times
WASHINGTON President Trump's stunning firing of the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, injected another volatile ingredient into the partisanship already engulfing the capital and threatened to overwhelm Republican efforts to turn their government ...
Republicans Rush to Support TrumpThe Atlantic
Comey firing roils Washington, prompts calls for independent investigation and divides RepublicansWashington Post
How Republicans are reacting to Trump's firing of ComeyCNN
Bloomberg -Fortune -Washington Examiner
all 4,652 news articles »

Read more from the original source:
Comey's Firing May Imperil Republicans' Legislative Agenda - New York Times

Tully: Will any Indiana Republican question President Trump? – Indianapolis Star

Matthew Tully Published 10:27 a.m. ET May 10, 2017 | Updated 40 minutes ago

President Trumps firing of FBI Director James Comey, is drawing comparisons to a controversial figure from 44 years past, President Nixon. Nathan Rousseau Smith (@fantasticmrnate) explains. Buzz60

Jan 20, 2017; Washington, DC, USA; President Donald Trump waves to the crowd after taking the oath of office during the 2017 Presidential Inauguration at the U.S. Capitol. Mandatory Credit: Robert Hanashiro-USA TODAY(Photo: Robert Hanashiro-USA TODAY Sports)

I found myself missing Richard Lugar on Wednesday morning.

Thats not unusual; Ive felt many times in recent months that our political system could use a dose of Lugars logic and reason, and that the Senate was in desperate need of another person of principle willing to put truth and country ahead of partisanship. The election of President Donald Trump has made the countrys loss of leaders like Lugar even more painful.

But Lugar isnt coming back to the Senate. His political career came to a conclusion back in 2012, when Indiana Republican primary voters tossed him aside in favor of a bomb-thrower of a candidate who ended up losing that years general election, but whose rabid partisanship would actually fit in quite well in Washington right now. Lugar left the Senate, taking with him a belief in bipartisan compromise and deep thinking.

More Tully:The failed presidency of Donald J. Trump

More Tully:A politician who is making his city better

Analysis:Trump thrusts US presidency into perilous area

We could use a lot more of both of those traits right now. Washingtons problems are not limited to or caused by only one party. But one party is in charge, and we sure could benefit from more Republicans with the courage to simply do the right thing.

So lets ask the question: In Lugars absence, is there an elected Republican of note in Indiana willing to stand up and question a presidency that is becoming more troubling, more authoritarian and more dangerous by the day?

Is there even one member of the GOP congressional delegation willing to step out of the partisan line and ask serious questions about the firing of FBI Director James Comey? Its sad that this next question seems so silly, but is there a sole congressional Republican elected by the people of Indiana who can convince us that not everything comes down to party loyalty and concerns about the next election?

Ive seen no evidence as of yet that the answer to any of those questions is yes.

Sen. Todd Young, elected to the Senate in November, issued a statement saying, I'm working to learn the facts behind the presidents decision, but I hope new leadership at the FBI will help restore Americans' confidence."

Well, it wont.

What will help restore Americans confidence is a congressional majority that stops treating this failed presidency with kid gloves. What will restore Americans confidence is the emergence of more senators willing to demand answers from the White House. What will restore Americans confidence is a reaction to an historically stunning firing that adds up to more than silence and wishy-washy statements.

Reps. Luke Messer and Todd Rokita, a pair of House Republicans expected to run for the Senate next year, have downplayed the issue, either with silence or, in Rokitas case, with typical partisan rhetoric and a pathetic fundraising appeal.

Politically, thats understandable, as both will need to win over the most loyal Republicans in the state, including a lot of Trump die-hards, in next years Senate primary. But its hard to understand at a time like this how anyone could remain quiet, or just toe the party line, or be so cynical as to exploit the issue for campaign cash. And its hard to imagine that the two lawmakers would have responded similarly if this weeks firing had been carried out by a President Hillary Clinton.

I know each of us sees the world through our own lens, and I know most of us judge behaviors and actions at least a little differently depending on whether they are carried out by those on our side of the aisle, or those the other side. But we should expect more of those elected to lead us. Things like the firing of an FBI director who was conducting an investigation that the president who fired him did not like well, thats when we need true leaders. Thats when we need lawmakers willing to question those on their own side of the aisle. Thats when we need acts of political bravery.

Is there one elected Republican from Indiana with the courage to ask tough questions and demand answers that are not simply spin? The coming days will answer that question.

Thank you for reading. Please follow me on Twitter:@matthewltully.

Read or Share this story: http://indy.st/2pwEjbt

Read more from the original source:
Tully: Will any Indiana Republican question President Trump? - Indianapolis Star

After negotiations falter, Dayton vows to veto ‘every one’ of Republicans’ budget bills – MinnPost

Its practically a rite of spring in St. Paul now: The trees blossom, the birds come back and the workings inside the Minnesota Capitol go dark.

Thats what happened this week, as negotiations over the states two-year, roughly $45 billion state budget went from plodding steadily toward a resolution to what seemed like a sudden break, between the Republicans who control the Legislature and Democratic Gov. Mark Dayton.

Those tensions set off a series of moves by Republican leaders that started late Monday and went into Tuesday evening, as GOP lawmakers worked to send their budget bills to Daytons desk without a compromise.

In response, the governor assured reporters Tuesday that he will veto them all, leaving everyone in the dark as to what happens next.

The two parties have less than two weeks until May 22, their constitutionally imposed deadline to adjourn the 2017 session. If they dont finish on time, Dayton can call legislators back into a special session to finish budget bills. But if that doesnt happen before July 1 the start of the next fiscal year state government operations will go into automatic shutdown mode.

Like most sessions, lawmakers convened in January saying what they almost always say: that they didnt want things to end this year with closed-door negotiations, late-night maneuvers and deals pushed until the final hours. That it was going to be different this year.

And it was, for a time. Lawmakers bumped up deadlines to get major budget work done and made it to negotiations with the governor earlier than usual. But, as in most sessions, the drama happened anyway.

Its had different forms, Dayton said Tuesday, remarking on how recent sessions have all concluded with last-minute blowups. We each have very different views about whats best for Minnesotans. Minnesotans should expect that were going to have these very significant differences; the question is how we are going to resolve them.

The rift came after Dayton and legislative leaders had spent the previous five days in meetings discussing a budget deal, usually emerging from those discussions with few details to share but generally positive remarks about the process. They described talks as productive and cordial, even though lawmakers still had major differences to work out.

Those differences largely center on what to do with the states $1.5 billion budget surplus. Republicans want tax cuts something north of $1 billion though they also want to trim spending on health and human services and state government administration. The governor is proposing to raise spending on things like health care, education and state government.

On Monday, budget negotiations moved into the horse-trading phase. Dayton made an offer on four smaller budget areas public safety, higher education, economic development and agriculture reducing his proposed total spending by about $74 million, he said.

After the meeting, House Speaker Kurt Daudt emerged and said hed hoped things were moving faster, but they were still making progress. Things at the Legislature never move as quickly as I would like them to, and Im sure the public probably feels the same way, but we are working hard and we are working well together.

MinnPost photo by Briana Bierschbach

After the meeting, House Speaker Kurt Daudt emerged and said hed hoped things were moving faster, but they were still making progress.

But behind the scenes, things started moving very quickly. Republicans left the meeting with the governor and went into meetings with rank-and-file legislators. Later that evening, they began preparing their own budget bills for a vote, with or without a compromise in hand. On Tuesday morning, Republican Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka said negotiations had slowed down over the weekend and the offers presented by Dayton on Monday were unacceptable.

The steps were so small on the smallest bills that we didnt know how we could possibly get there, Gazelka said. I think they were sincere first offers, but they were unacceptable and would not lead to getting done on time.

Daudt said they were worried Dayton was slow-walking a deal because he would benefit politically the longer negotiations take. The governor gains leverage if he pushes us to the end, Daudt said, describing the move to vote on their budget as a backup plan.

Republicans and Dayton met again Tuesday afternoon, with Republicans presenting an offer on all of their budget bills, reducing their tax cut proposal from $1.13 billion to $1 billion and spending more on state government and health and human services. Dayton countered that with another offer on the four budget bills discussed the day before, coming down a total of $122 million.

Republicans left the meeting frustrated they werent making progress. Within hours, they began taking up their budget bills on the House and Senate floors.

What does this all mean for the end of session? At the very least, the move delays further negotiations between Dayton and Republicans. It will take several days for legislators to pass all of their budget bills and send them to Dayton. The governor said that he will veto all of the budget proposals.

"They should know that I will veto every one of those bills, which will leave us with the same differences several days from now that we face today, Dayton said. Their actions will make it much more difficult for them to fulfill their constitutional responsibility to send me budget bills, which I can sign, by May 22.

Dayton added that the actions of the GOP leadership, in the middle of discussions with his office, have changed the tone of negotiations going forward. All the flurry of activity over the last 12 hours without any discussion with us, without any forewarning, Dayton said. It certainly changes the tenor, for sure.

Republicans and governor are not unfamiliar with discord: They went into a 20-day government shutdown over the budget in 2011, and the last two sessions under divided government have ended in acrimony, special session talks and plenty of unfinished business.

MinnPost photo by Briana Bierschbach

Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka: The steps were so small on the smallest bills that we didnt know how we could possibly get there.

For now, all sides say they still want to work together, even if their actions are sending mixed signals about whether that can actually happen. Ive done this before and Ive been involved in a few of the blowups before the breakthrough, and that does happen, Daudt said Tuesday. I don't think this is [a blowup]. We want to work with the governor, we want to get this solved.

For his part, Dayton remained open to meeting with Republicans on Wednesday, even as they continued to pass budget bills he plans to veto. Daytons daily public schedule, which he releases to reporters, read that Wednesday is intentionally left open to be responsive to the legislative process.

If that doesnt happen, perhaps theyll talk about it Friday. Thats when the governor and legislative leaders are scheduled to be together on a boat in the middle of the Mississippi River in St. Cloud for the states fishing opener.

Read more:
After negotiations falter, Dayton vows to veto 'every one' of Republicans' budget bills - MinnPost