Archive for the ‘Republicans’ Category

Most Republicans still falsely believe Trump’s stolen election claims. Here are some reasons why. – Poynter

Former President Donald Trump has made the stolen 2020 election the centerpiece of his post-White House political life. Virtually every statement he sends out invokes the false theme.

The polling shows it has been effective, not just with the crowd that stormed the Capitol on his behalf on Jan. 6, 2021, but with members of the Republican Party almost a year and a half later.

The multiple recounts and audits that confirmed Joe Bidens win have changed little. With remarkable consistency, a scant one-quarter of Republican voters tell pollsters that Biden won legitimately. That was the view they shared in the spring of 2021, and the fraction remains about the same today.

Roughly 70% of Republicans dont see Biden as the legitimate winner. Surveys by different pollsters show virtually the same results, with the exception of a Washington Post/University of Maryland poll that dropped it to 61%.

Trumps insistence that he won the 2020 election became the target of the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack. In the second of a series of hearings revealing what it has found, the committee showed video of Trump insiders describing how, from the earliest days, the conviction grew that Trump had failed to get enough votes.

Campaign manager Bill Stepientold investigatorsthat by Nov. 5, two days after the election, they saw Biden take the lead. Stepien and other top campaign staff went to Trump.

We told him, the group that went over there, (we) outlined my belief on the chances for success at this point, and we pegged it at 5%, maybe 10%, Stepien said.

The situation, Stepien said, was very, very bleak.

Acting Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue was one of many officials who tried to counter Trumps claims of fraud.

I said something to the effect of, Sir, weve done dozens of investigations, hundreds of interviews. The major allegations are not supported by the evidence developed. Weve looked at Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Nevada. We are doing our job. Much of the info you are getting is false, Donoghue told investigators.

Focus groups have shown that Trump supporters werent swayed by specific pieces of evidence that rebutted his claims.

Sarah Longwell, executive director of Republicans for the Rule of Law, has conducted regular focus groups with fans of Trump.

For many of Trumps voters, the belief that the election was stolen is not a fully formed thought, Longwell wroteApril 18for The Atlantic. They know something nefarious occurred, but cant easily explain how or why. Whats more, theyre mystified and sometimes angry that other people dont feel the same.

Trump, Longwell wrote, primed his backers to disbelieve the official results. Months before the vote, he linked mail-in ballots to fraud. On Election Night in many states, mail-in results come later than in-person tabulations. Longwell said that timing raised suspicions.

A woman from Georgia told me, When I went to bed, Trump was so in the lead and then (I got) up and hes not in the lead. I mean, thats crazy, Longwell said.

Other interviews with Trump voters found similar attitudes. Researchers at the University of Texas at AustinsCenter for Media Engagementspent time with 56 people who believed that Trump most likely won the election. Professor Talia Stroud said that contrary to popular assumptions, the people we spoke with were not conspiracists isolated in right-wing echo chambers.

These voters said they got their news from a variety of outlets, and wound up with multiple theories of how the vote was manipulated. Stroud said the multiple reasons made it harder to change their minds.

It is one thing to dismiss one misleading claim, but countering many different claims across many different people is much more challenging, Stroud said. If I have five reasons that the election could have been fraudulent, and you dismiss one of them, there are four others waiting in the wings.

Personal experience also reinforced belief. Political scientist Lilliana Mason at Johns Hopkins University told us that maps of the election results show that many Republican voters live in communities that are almost entirely red.

It seems ludicrous to them that Biden could have won, because theyve never heard of a single person who voted for him, Mason said.

Political scientist Alexander Theodoridis, associate director of the University of Massachusetts-Amherst poll, said partisan polarization makes agreement on the election results even harder to achieve.

Partisans view the other side as morally bankrupt and capable of anything, Theodoridis said. This makes it nearly impossible to correct even the most egregious pieces of misinformation.

Not only does accurate information fail to persuade, Longwell said the effort can backfire.

A woman from Arizona told me, I think what convinced me more that the election was fixed was how vehemently they have said it wasnt, Longwell said.

This article was originallypublished by PolitiFact, which is part of the Poynter Institute. It is republished here with permission. See the sources hereand more of their fact checkshere.

Read the rest here:
Most Republicans still falsely believe Trump's stolen election claims. Here are some reasons why. - Poynter

Calmes: During Watergate, Republicans made ‘the system’ work. Today’s GOP is failing the nation – Los Angeles Times

Friday is the 50th anniversary of the Watergate burglary that would end Richard M. Nixons presidency two years later. By then, his vice president and successor, Gerald R. Ford Jr., would tell Americans, Our long national nightmare is over.

Little could Ford or his audience have imagined the nations current nightmare, one thats far from over. Were enduring the biggest presidential scandal since Watergate, or ever: Donald Trumps continued assault on democracy, following his unprecedented refusal to accept the 2020 election result and allow for the peaceful transfer of power to the winner.

When it comes to presidential disgrace, Don the Con tops even Tricky Dick. Trump, however, has had much more help achieving his ignominy.

Opinion Columnist

Jackie Calmes

Jackie Calmes brings a critical eye to the national political scene. She has decades of experience covering the White House and Congress.

When Nixon resigned and helicoptered away from the White House, the often uttered consensus was that the system worked. All three branches of government had done their part: Congress, the courts and even the executive branch once Nixons henchmen were out of the way and prison-bound. Finally Nixon himself a believer in constitutional governance, despite his many flaws, and a patriot compared to the traitorous Trump accepted that the jig was up.

In Trumps case, the system hasnt worked. So far. He walks free as the Justice Department dallies, has raised hundreds of millions of dollars from his marks, er, supporters (The Big Lie was also a big ripoff, as San Jose Rep. Zoe Lofgren said), and says he plans to run for president again. Its far from clear whether the system will or can bring him to justice before that happens.

Yet weve gained some hard-won knowledge: Its not the system that must work to preserve our 246-year-old nation. Its the people whom we entrust to operate the machinery of government who must act.

And those people, chiefly the Republicans among them, continue to fail us. Led in Congress by Sen. Mitch McConnell and Rep. Kevin McCarthy, theyve enabled Trumps worst abuses for years by their acquiescence and by their opposition to his impeachment, first for extorting from a foreign country for political dirt and then for inciting an insurrection to remain in power.

In February 2021, the Senate voted 57 to 43 to convict Trump for incitement, but the majority all 50 Democrats and seven principled Republicans was 10 votes shy of the two-thirds margin needed under the Constitution. Had McConnell and just nine additional Republicans voted to convict, they wouldnt have to worry that Trump might well be their partys 2024 nominee. They could have barred him, post-conviction, from running for federal office.

Nixon, too, had his Republican enablers initially, including Sen. Howard H. Baker Jr. of Tennessee. That helps explain why it was more than two years from the election-year burglary of the Democratic Party headquarters in the Watergate building to Nixons resignation under threat of impeachment and Senate conviction.

Yet back then, the truth had a common meaning to both parties. Baker and many other Republicans in Congress not only were swayed by the evidence that mounted against Nixon, they also helped force that evidence into the light during the House impeachment hearing and, especially, the Senates special Watergate committee hearings.

What did the president know, and when did he know it? Baker, the Senate panels vice chair, famously asked.

Other Republican leaders, including conservative icon Sen. Barry Goldwater of Arizona, went to the White House and persuaded Nixon to resign rather than be forced from office by Congress.

That reflects another difference between then and now: Most Republicans of that era put country above party and rewarded those politicians who acted accordingly.

Following Bakers starring role against Nixon, he would become the Senate majority leader and then Ronald Reagans White House chief of staff. Contrast his fortunes with the partys treatment of Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney, also the vice chair of a committee investigating a Republican presidential scandal.

Just for condemning the condemnable Trump, Cheney was ousted from the House Republican leadership team (with McCarthys support), excommunicated by the Wyoming Republican Party (its chair belongs to the Oath Keepers militia group), censured by the Republican National Committee and likely faces defeat for reelection to a Trump-endorsed rival.

Illinois Rep. Adam Kinzinger, the only other Republican to similarly stand up to Trump and to serve on the House committee investigating the attempted coup, has been treated likewise. He chose not to seek reelection.

The Republican Party is Trumps party: radicalized, tribal, cultish. Most congressional Republicans wouldnt even vote to create a committee to investigate the attack on the legislative branch by the head of the executive branch, an attack that threatened their lives. Those who did are being punished by Trumpian voters in party primaries.

Yes, Republican voters are as much to blame as the partys politicians for failures of the system. In recent primaries, including in four states Tuesday, the voters have chosen scores of state and federal candidates who ascribe to Trumps Big Lie that the 2020 election was stolen from him.

Driving in rural Ohio on Sunday after a visit with family there, I passed a sign on a farm fence: Biden didnt defeat Trump. Election fraud did.

That sums up the Republican litmus test these days, and its a lie. State and federal politicians stoke the lie or at least tolerate it. Until they stop, the system cannot work as it once so proudly did. And our national nightmare not only persists, it threatens to get worse.

@jackiekcalmes

Read the original post:
Calmes: During Watergate, Republicans made 'the system' work. Today's GOP is failing the nation - Los Angeles Times

Republicans face a day of reckoning – The Herald Journal

Country

United States of AmericaUS Virgin IslandsUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsCanadaMexico, United Mexican StatesBahamas, Commonwealth of theCuba, Republic ofDominican RepublicHaiti, Republic ofJamaicaAfghanistanAlbania, People's Socialist Republic ofAlgeria, People's Democratic Republic ofAmerican SamoaAndorra, Principality ofAngola, Republic ofAnguillaAntarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S)Antigua and BarbudaArgentina, Argentine RepublicArmeniaArubaAustralia, Commonwealth ofAustria, Republic ofAzerbaijan, Republic ofBahrain, Kingdom ofBangladesh, People's Republic ofBarbadosBelarusBelgium, Kingdom ofBelizeBenin, People's Republic ofBermudaBhutan, Kingdom ofBolivia, Republic ofBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswana, Republic ofBouvet Island (Bouvetoya)Brazil, Federative Republic ofBritish Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago)British Virgin IslandsBrunei DarussalamBulgaria, People's Republic ofBurkina FasoBurundi, Republic ofCambodia, Kingdom ofCameroon, United Republic ofCape Verde, Republic ofCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChad, Republic ofChile, Republic ofChina, People's Republic ofChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombia, Republic ofComoros, Union of theCongo, Democratic Republic ofCongo, People's Republic ofCook IslandsCosta Rica, Republic ofCote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of theCyprus, Republic ofCzech RepublicDenmark, Kingdom ofDjibouti, Republic ofDominica, Commonwealth ofEcuador, Republic ofEgypt, Arab Republic ofEl Salvador, Republic ofEquatorial Guinea, Republic ofEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFaeroe IslandsFalkland Islands (Malvinas)Fiji, Republic of the Fiji IslandsFinland, Republic ofFrance, French RepublicFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabon, Gabonese RepublicGambia, Republic of theGeorgiaGermanyGhana, Republic ofGibraltarGreece, Hellenic RepublicGreenlandGrenadaGuadaloupeGuamGuatemala, Republic ofGuinea, RevolutionaryPeople's Rep'c ofGuinea-Bissau, Republic ofGuyana, Republic ofHeard and McDonald IslandsHoly See (Vatican City State)Honduras, Republic ofHong Kong, Special Administrative Region of ChinaHrvatska (Croatia)Hungary, Hungarian People's RepublicIceland, Republic ofIndia, Republic ofIndonesia, Republic ofIran, Islamic Republic ofIraq, Republic ofIrelandIsrael, State ofItaly, Italian RepublicJapanJordan, Hashemite Kingdom ofKazakhstan, Republic ofKenya, Republic ofKiribati, Republic ofKorea, Democratic People's Republic ofKorea, Republic ofKuwait, State ofKyrgyz RepublicLao People's Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanon, Lebanese RepublicLesotho, Kingdom ofLiberia, Republic ofLibyan Arab JamahiriyaLiechtenstein, Principality ofLithuaniaLuxembourg, Grand Duchy ofMacao, Special Administrative Region of ChinaMacedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic ofMadagascar, Republic ofMalawi, Republic ofMalaysiaMaldives, Republic ofMali, Republic ofMalta, Republic ofMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritania, Islamic Republic ofMauritiusMayotteMicronesia, Federated States ofMoldova, Republic ofMonaco, Principality ofMongolia, Mongolian People's RepublicMontserratMorocco, Kingdom ofMozambique, People's Republic ofMyanmarNamibiaNauru, Republic ofNepal, Kingdom ofNetherlands AntillesNetherlands, Kingdom of theNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaragua, Republic ofNiger, Republic of theNigeria, Federal Republic ofNiue, Republic ofNorfolk IslandNorthern Mariana IslandsNorway, Kingdom ofOman, Sultanate ofPakistan, Islamic Republic ofPalauPalestinian Territory, OccupiedPanama, Republic ofPapua New GuineaParaguay, Republic ofPeru, Republic ofPhilippines, Republic of thePitcairn IslandPoland, Polish People's RepublicPortugal, Portuguese RepublicPuerto RicoQatar, State ofReunionRomania, Socialist Republic ofRussian FederationRwanda, Rwandese RepublicSamoa, Independent State ofSan Marino, Republic ofSao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic ofSaudi Arabia, Kingdom ofSenegal, Republic ofSerbia and MontenegroSeychelles, Republic ofSierra Leone, Republic ofSingapore, Republic ofSlovakia (Slovak Republic)SloveniaSolomon IslandsSomalia, Somali RepublicSouth Africa, Republic ofSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSpain, Spanish StateSri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic ofSt. HelenaSt. Kitts and NevisSt. LuciaSt. Pierre and MiquelonSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudan, Democratic Republic of theSuriname, Republic ofSvalbard & Jan Mayen IslandsSwaziland, Kingdom ofSweden, Kingdom ofSwitzerland, Swiss ConfederationSyrian Arab RepublicTaiwan, Province of ChinaTajikistanTanzania, United Republic ofThailand, Kingdom ofTimor-Leste, Democratic Republic ofTogo, Togolese RepublicTokelau (Tokelau Islands)Tonga, Kingdom ofTrinidad and Tobago, Republic ofTunisia, Republic ofTurkey, Republic ofTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUganda, Republic ofUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited Kingdom of Great Britain & N. IrelandUruguay, Eastern Republic ofUzbekistanVanuatuVenezuela, Bolivarian Republic ofViet Nam, Socialist Republic ofWallis and Futuna IslandsWestern SaharaYemenZambia, Republic ofZimbabwe

Read the original:
Republicans face a day of reckoning - The Herald Journal

After Jan. 6, hundreds of corporations vowed to not donate to Republicans who voted to overturn the election. Many haven’t kept their promise. – GBH…

In the wake of the Jan. 6 insurrection, scores of corporations promised to cease donations to the 147 Republicans who voted to overturn the election results. More than a year later, many have quietly reneged on that promise.

Judd Legum, who has tracked corporations promises and donations in the wake of the insurrection, joined Boston Public Radio in advance of Thursdays House Select Committee hearings on Jan. 6 to share his findings.

Fifteen companies, including AT&T, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Walgreens and Walmart, have restarted directly donating to Republicans who voted to overturn the election. Ten companies have donated to larger multi-candidate groups that include the election objectors. Another 100 companies pledged to either suspend or reevaluate their political spending and have since resumed their direct or indirect donations, as of Legums latest research by June 7.

I think for some companies, it was definitely just marketing, Legum said. He pointed to AT&T as an example, which made its pledge in January 2020. Then, the company donated to a multi-candidate group, claiming their money was not going to any of the 147 Republicans. In 2022, the company donated more than $200,000 to dozens of the Republican objectors.

He also pointed out that public opinion may not matter as much to companies who don't rely on everyday consumers as customers. Some of the first companies that ended up giving to the folks who voted to overturn the election on January 6 were defense contractors, because they really don't have to worry about how they're perceived, except for among members of Congress, he said.

For Republicans who make election lies a core part of their platform, Legum noted that they are not feeling a huge financial hit after losing some corporate donations. They've been able to tap into the energy around the Big Lie about the election and use that as a fundraising vehicle and so for them, their contributions are larger than ever, he said.

Legum and his team have found 33 companies kept their promises not to donate to the 147 Republicans, including Airbnb, American Express, Eversource Energy and Vertex. Another group of 26 companies have kept pledges to suspend all PAC donations, among which are Target, Facebook and Bank of America.

Over time, he expects more companies will go back on their promises, especially as some predict Republicans will gain ground in the midterm elections this fall. This isn't only speculation, there's been reporting in the Wall Street Journal and in my own conversations with people in the PAC world, he said. People are being very direct about, Now is the time to resume these contributions or you're not going to get meetings.

As for corporations, paying their way to the good side of a politician often pays off. It's the annual appropriations, it's regulations, these companies might need something slipped into a bill and in the past they've been able to rely on X, Y, Z congressperson to get that in in the chaos of these huge omnibus bills, Legum explained. That person might not be around if they don't resume contributions. So that's really the leverage, and for many of these companies, it's working.

It wasnt always this way. Legum pointed to the 1980s as a moment where corporate spending on politics grew, a shift he attributed to companies growing emphasis on pleasing shareholders and maximizing quarterly profits.

Companies in the 50s and 60s, if you looked at corporate annual reports, they would brag about how much tax money they spent ... because that was sort of seen as part of what it meant to be a good corporate citizen, Legum said. As it's become more important to drive your tax rate down to drive away any regulation that could get in the way of profits ... one of the ways to make sure to do that is to make sure that you're very well connected politically.

In terms of the everyday consumers impact on corporate spending, Legum feels mixed as to how effective they can be in holding large corporations accountable. He also tracks corporate spending around other issues including climate change, abortion and LGBTQ rights, and knows that few companies have consistent politics.

A company that's good on one issue may not be as good on another, he said. Fundamentally, I think that there needs to be a shift both in the way corporations operate, and the way the government operates to make some systemic changes. It's going to be hard for you as an individual consumer to change the way things are done.

Still, Legum believes ordinary people can wield some power. I do think over time, just allowing people to realize that consumers are paying attention, that they're focused in on these issues makes a difference, he said. That's why these companies decided to stop making these contributions, and they were stuck doing it to begin with.

Judd Legum writes the newsletter Popular Information, and was previously the founder and editor of ThinkProgress.

Original post:
After Jan. 6, hundreds of corporations vowed to not donate to Republicans who voted to overturn the election. Many haven't kept their promise. - GBH...

Republicans freak out when Michigan AG jokes that there should be a drag queen for every school – LGBTQ Nation

Dana NesselPhoto: MSNBC screenshot

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel recently blasted the numerous Republicans who have sought to criminalize child attendance at drag queen performances, calling it a not a problem and a needlessly divisive wedge issue.

I am so tired of having prominent members of our state government create wedge issues that dont help, that dont heal us but divide us. And thats all they do, Nessel said while speaking at a civil rights conference in Lansing on Wednesday.

Related: This 12-year-old bought his family a house with money he earned fromdrag

Nessel said that state leaders who want to improve health care, education, and housing in the state shouldnt target minority groups, commenting, [You] know what is not a problem for kids who are seeking a good education? Drag queens.

Drag queens are entertainment, she added, according to The Detroit News. And you know what Ill say that was totally not poll-tested, Id say this, A drag queen for every school.'

At other points, she called drag queens fun, stating that they can help cheer up children with emotional issues and make everything better.

Nessels comments were likely a reaction to Republican efforts to criminalize the presence of children at drag shows. Tudor Dixon, a Republican candidate for Michigan governor, said he would support a bill handing down severe criminal penalties for adults who involve children in drag shows.

In response to Nessels comments, the former presidents son, Donald Trump Jr. wrote on Twitter, A Drag Queen for every school is a great summation of todays Democrat Party Platform.

The Michigan State Republican Party Chief of Staff, Paul Codres, wrote in response to Nessels comment, This is unbelievable. This is not normal. She shouldnt be allowed to joke this away.

In early June, Texas state Rep. Bryan Slaton (R)announcedthat he intends to file a bill during the state legislatures upcoming session that would ban drag shows in the presence of minors. He has claimed that drag shows subject underage kids to inappropriate sexual content by adults.

A few days later, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) implied he is open to using Floridas child protective service laws to terminate the parental rights of adults who take their kids to see drag shows. When will the sexualization of children stop? he asked in a tweet. His press secretary, Christina Pushaw, has said that any person who supports acknowledging the existence of LGBTQ people in schools supports pedophilic child rape.

Right-wingers have increasingly targeted child-centered drag events such as Drag Queen Story Hour, accusing the educational and LGBTQ-inclusive family-friendly events of grooming children for sexual assault and exposing them to inappropriate sexual content. Most such events just feature lip-sync performances, sing-alongs, dance-alongs, and storytelling by drag performers in colorful costumes and makeup. The performers teach kids about self-acceptance and caring for others who may look or love differently than they do.

Right-wingers have issued terroristic bomb and death threats against local libraries for holding these events. Such protesters sometimes infiltrate the venues, frightening children and their families as well as recording and threatening public exposure of any adults who participate in them.

The rest is here:
Republicans freak out when Michigan AG jokes that there should be a drag queen for every school - LGBTQ Nation