Archive for the ‘Rand Paul’ Category

The return of the libertarian moment – The Week Magazine

February 2, 2022

February 2, 2022

Do you remember the "libertarian moment"?

I wouldn't blame you if not. For a few years around the end of the Obama administration, though, it looked as if the right just might coalesce around restrained foreign policy, opposition to electronic surveillance and other threats to civil liberties, and enthusiasm for an innovative economy, very much including the tech industry. Beyond policy, the libertarian turn was associated with a hip affect that signaled comfort with pop culture. Even though they were personally far from cool, The New York Times compared the movement's electoral figureheads, the father-and-son duo Ron and Rand Paul, to grunge bands Nirvana and Pearl Jam.

In retrospect, those descriptions seem naive. Less than a year after the Times feature was published, the announcement of Donald Trump's presidential campaign sounded the death knell of the libertarian moment (along with Rand Paul's own bid for the presidency).In another unforeseen twist, though, the pendulum seems to now be swinging back toward libertarian instincts.

While in office, Trump had deployed an apocalyptic idiom that clashed dramatically with the libertarians'characteristic optimism. Although personally indifferent to ideas, Trump also inspired a cohort of intellectuals who denounced libertarians' ostensible indifference to the common good and proposed a more assertive role for government in directing economic and social life.

But as the pandemic has continued, opposition to restrictions on personal conduct, suspicion of expert authority, and free speech for controversial opinions have become dominant themes in center-right argument and activism. The symbolic villain of the new libertarian moment is Anthony Fauci. Its heroes include Joe Rogan, whose podcast has been a platform for vaccine skeptics, advocates of ivermectin and other dubious treatments for COVID, and other challenges to the expert consensus.

Appeals to personal freedom, limited government, and epistemological skepticism against pandemic authorities have some basis in the organized libertarian movement. Early in the pandemic, the American Institute for Economic Research issued the so-called Great Barrington Declaration, which rejected lockdowns and argued (before vaccines became available) that mitigation strategies should be limited to the most vulnerable portion of the population. In the Senate, Paul (Ky.) has been the leading critic of Fauci and the CDC. Long-standing libertarian positions have also been energized by the pandemic. The disruption of public education, for example, has revitalized the school choice movement.

But it would be a mistake to think these appeals succeed because Americans have any newfound appreciation for Milton Friedman, Friedrich Hayek, or other libertarian thinkers. More than any coherent political theory, the libertarian revival draws on inarticulate but powerful currents of anti-authoritarianism in American culture. In a blog post drawing on the work of historian David Hackett Fischer, the writer Tanner Greer argues that this disposition is an inheritance from the Scots-Irish settlers of colonial America. Concentrating on its recent expressions, my predecessor Matthew Walther described the defiant, individualistic, risk-embracing sensibility as "barstool conservatism" after Barstool Sports founder Dave Portnoy, who joins Rogan among its most prominent representatives.

Whatever its origins, the new quasi-libertarianism is an obstacle to the managerial tendencies that increasingly define the center-left. More than opposition to the government as such, it revolves around opposition to administrative restrictions imposed for one's own good. If the old libertarianism was obsessed with the risk of ideological totalitarianism, the new version concentrates on the influence of human resources bureaucrats, public health officials, and neighborhood busybodies.

Its idealized enemy isn't the commissar. It's the high school guidance counselor.

That reorientation from philosophical to mundane grievances iskey to its demographic appeal. Decades ago, the left benefitted from its association with resistance to busybodies. Think of Frank Zappa and other musicians who opposed efforts to place warning labels on records they considered obscene. Today, outspoken progressives are prominent among those demanding censorship of putative misinformation including Rogan's removal from the Spotify platform that hosts his podcast. An occasionally juvenile sense of defying petty tyranny helps explain why the libertarian revival appeals so powerfully to young men (and why spokesmen like Rogan and Portnoy often have backgrounds in sports entertainment). Rather than a defense of natural rights, it's an instinctive dislike of being bossed around.

The inchoate libertarian revival isn't just the political equivalent of cutting class, though. The unimpressive performance of schools, the FDA, and other vehicles of public policy have undermined the ambitious goals Democrats hoped to pursue under the Biden Administration. It's hard to make the case for free college, increased educational spending, or single-payer healthcare with the institutions that would have to deliver these benefits seem unwilling or unable to do their current jobs. Progressives don't want to hear it, but the era of big government is probably over again.

In the past, that conclusion might have been celebrated by conservatives. Today, it's more controversial. During Trump's presidency, some theorists entertained hopes that Republicans might become the "party of the state." In addition to conventional hopes for restricting pornography and halting or reversing the legalization of drugs, that includes proposals for sweeping industrial policies to promote domestic manufacturing and cash benefits for married parents to promote traditional family patterns. Rejecting libertarian confidence in spontaneous order, these intellectuals argued that both the economy and the culture need to be intentionally guided toward the common good.

The New Right's challenge to libertarian optimism that order, prosperity, or other conservative goals would come about automatically is often insightful. But it's their hope that the dour and devout can achieve theoretically rational outcomesby capturing and redirecting some of the same institutions that have been discredited during the pandemic that now seems utopian.

Iconoclastic podcasters and the "Freedom Convoy" of truckers protesting vaccine mandates may not have been what journalists and activists had in mind when they spoke of the libertarian moment five years ago. But they're the vanguard of its sequeltoday.

See the article here:
The return of the libertarian moment - The Week Magazine

Owensboro native Southard named Republican Party of Kentucky Director of Communications – The Owensboro Times

The Republican Party of Kentucky (RPK) has namedOwensboro native SeanSouthard as its Director of Communications.

Southard said he is honored to take on the role, which he will begin on February 21.

Kentucky is faced with critical races in 2022 and 2023 and with out-of-control inflation and a lackluster labor participation rate, we need strong Republican leadership in office to fix the problems facing Kentuckys small business owners and working families, he said. We must re-elect our majorities in the General Assembly, send Dr. Rand Paul back to the United States Senate, and make sure Andy Beshear is a one-term governor.

Southard currently serves as the Director of Communications for Kentucky Agriculture Commissioner Ryan Quarles, a role hes held since 2017. He began his career at RunSwitch PR, where he developed and executed messaging strategies for clients. In 2021, Southard was named the top political staffer in state government by Kentucky Fried Politics.

The Republican Party of Kentucky is excited to welcomeSeanSouthard to our organization, RPK Chairman Mac Brown. Seanis known as an outstanding communicator and his strategic abilities will greatly enhance RPKs team. All Kentucky Republicans will benefit from his broad experience as we advocate for the election of our candidates across the state.

Original post:
Owensboro native Southard named Republican Party of Kentucky Director of Communications - The Owensboro Times

Trump interference exacerbates GOP split on election reforms – POLITICO

Sen. Shelley Moore Capito is a member of the bipartisan working group.

The gang is working to make it harder for senators and House members to challenge presidential election results, as well as to clarify the vice presidents role in election certification as ceremonial. Capito predicted that at least 10 Republicans could eventually come on board the final product: Theres a sweet spot of getting at least 60 people, and maybe more if we keep it narrow and focused and repair what needs to be repaired. It will probably take longer than people think.

In interviews with a dozen GOP senators over the past week, Cruz (R-Texas) came out most forcefully against the groups ongoing work to raise the bar for challenging elections in Congress.

I dont think a political stunt designed to go after President Trump is a worthwhile expenditure of time and energy, Cruz said.

And Hawley (R-Mo.) warned senators to be really careful about messing around with a law thats been on the books that long, thats governed that many elections.

Its not necessarily surprising that two senators who led objections to the certification of the 2020 results would question those who want to hamstring their ability to do so in the future. But it points to a gulf in the party over whether to dive into the Electoral Count Act or stay away from it altogether and avoid another conflict with Trump.

Last year, 19 Senate Republicans defied the former president and supported the bipartisan infrastructure law. But the idea of restricting election challenges, under the assumption that it would prevent a future Capitol riot-style attack, is significantly more sensitive for Republicans, given Trumps obsession with his loss and his recent assertion that former Vice President Mike Pence should have overturned the election.

Senate Minority Whip John Thune (R-S.D.) said Trump's words will have an impact on GOP senators: Any time he speaks out on an issue, it gets some peoples attention." But Thune argued the GOP's reservations also center on trying to move so quickly to a bipartisan bill after Democrats forced a vote on weakening the filibuster in order to pass sweeping election reform.

I dont think theres any particular rush. These guys tried to blow up the Senate two weeks ago. Rewarding them by giving a win on something especially if theyre going to try and force their agenda into this is not something that some of our members are crazy about doing right away," Thune said.

Initially, most of the resistance to the work came from Democrats, who saw the Electoral Count Act as a distraction from the partys work on a sweeping elections and Voting Rights Act package. That reform push failed, leaving Democrats more open to seeing what the bipartisan group can produce. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said Tuesday that reforming the Electoral College is a good thing to do, but it sure doesnt replace the need to deal with voting rights.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is more overtly encouraging the group to work on updating the arcane law, and though theyve held multiple meetings, most recently on Wednesday, they are not close to a finished product. The group is looking at raising the threshold for objecting to a state's presidential election result higher than one senator and House member, making it clear the vice president has no role other than to count votes, enhancing protections for election officials and reauthorizing an expired voting grants program.

At their core, those reforms could have prevented or minimized the pro-Trump insurrection last year. A higher threshold may have prevented any votes or debate on election certification, and Congress would have completed its work more quickly before rioters entered the Capitol and disrupted the proceedings. And clarifying the vice presidents role would formally quash Trumps disputed theory that the vice president could unilaterally overturn an election.

There will be fairly widespread agreement that [the vice presidents role] needs to be clarified, said Maine Sen. Susan Collins, the lead GOP organizer of the effort. She added that there was also pretty much a consensus that one member in each chamber being enough to object to a states election results is "far too low a threshold.

Given the fluidity of Collins work, many Republicans declined to take a firm view on the groups proposed reforms, though some were surprisingly open to the idea. Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.), who initially sought to challenge the 2020 election results but did not ultimately vote to overturn them, called the Electoral Count Act antiquated and said it should take more than one member of each chamber to force a vote.

There could definitely be some clarifications. And it could be something we could do in a bipartisan way if the other side is willing to leave politics out of it, said Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who voted to certify the election results.

The most skepticism lies among those senators that voted against certifying the elections. Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) said it was unnecessary to revisit the law and that theres a lot of convincing to be done to think we need to do anything with it. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), one of eight senators who voted to block Bidens win, said he's "not against making it better, Im against doing something to just say we did something."

Even some of those who sided against Trump's efforts to overturn the election are openly questioning whether it should be a priority for the evenly split Senate.

Ive never seen a bigger disconnect between what actually matters on an hourly basis in our country versus what we spent our time on here, said Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who is neutral on the reforms being discussed. We could talk about inflation, we could talk about supply chain disruptions, talk about labor shortages ... theres virtually no conversation about that here.

Read more from the original source:
Trump interference exacerbates GOP split on election reforms - POLITICO

Rand Paul calls on Fauci to resign over gain-of-function …

Sen. Rand Paul blasted Dr. Anthony Fauci at a Senate hearing Thursday over gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China calling for his resignation and alleging hes learned nothing from this pandemic.

Paul (R-Ky.) grilled the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health, on why he repeatedly denied that the virus research was funded by the NIH prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Gain-of-function could cause a pandemic even worse next time, Paul said. [It] could endanger civilization as we know it.

The firebrand conservative claimed NIH-funded scientists created viruses not found in nature and that Fauci misled the American public by refusing to admit it.

Your repeated denials have worn thin and the majority of Americans, frankly, dont believe you, Paul said. Your persistent denials are not just a stain on your reputation but are a clear and present danger to the country and to the world.

You appear to have learned nothing from this pandemic, Paul said. I think its time you resign.

Regardless of whether the viruses created at the Wuhan Institute of Virology were linked to COVID-19, similar research funded by the NIH could spark another pandemic, Paul said. He also alleged that Fauci changed the definition of the term gain-of-function in order to deny it had happened.

Youve changed the definition on your website to cover your ass, Paul said.

But Fauci fired back, telling the Senate Health Committee that Paul is egregiously incorrect in what he says.

Senator, with all due respect, I disagree with so many of the things youve said, Fauci responded. First of all, gain of function is a very nebulous term.

He said the definition was developed over a period of two or three years beginning in 2014, and thatoutside bodies have spent a lot of time to give a more precise definition because it is a research of concern that might lead to a dangerous situation.

The gaudiness are clear that you have to be dealing with a pathogen that clearly shows [that its] very likely to be highly transmissible in an uncontrollable way in humans and to have a high degree of morbidity and that you do experiments to enhance that, he said.

In the case ofthe Wuhan Institute, Its much more likely that [COVID-19] was a natural occurrence, Fauci said.

The heated back-and-forth came two weeks after the NIHadmitted to funding gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses at Chinas Wuhan lab, despite Fauci repeatedly insisting to Congress that no such thing happened.

See the rest here:
Rand Paul calls on Fauci to resign over gain-of-function ...

Sen. Rand Paul: ‘Inflation is disproportionately hurting the working class and the poor’ – fox28media.com

  1. Sen. Rand Paul: 'Inflation is disproportionately hurting the working class and the poor'  fox28media.com
  2. Rand Paul releases report on rising inflation: 'It's only going to get worse'  Fox Business
  3. Rand Paul: Federal COVID stimulus to blame for record inflation  Santa Barbara News-Press
  4. Rand Paul releases 'Hidden Tax' report outlining how inflation will make Biden economy worse  Rebel News
  5. Rand Paul on Inflation: 'It's Only Going to Get Worse'  Newsmax
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

More:
Sen. Rand Paul: 'Inflation is disproportionately hurting the working class and the poor' - fox28media.com