Archive for the ‘Rand Paul’ Category

Rand Paul 2022: Wife, net worth, tattoos, smoking & body facts – Taddlr

On 7-1-1963 Rand Paul (nickname: Randal Howard Paul) was born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. He made his 1.5 million dollar fortune with United States Senator. The politician is married to Kelley Ashby, his starsign is Capricorn and he is now 59 years of age.Rand Paul Facts & WikiWhere does Rand Paul live? And how much money does Rand Paul earn?Birth Date7-1-1963Heritage/originAmericanEthnicityWhiteReligion - believes in God?ChristianResidenceHe owns a house in Lake Jackson, Texas, USA.Rand Paul Net Worth, Salary, Cars & HousesHousesCarsRELATED:These 10 Whopping Homes & Cars Of Celebrities Look Amazing!Rand Paul: Wife, Dating, Family & FriendsRand Paul with beautiful, Wife Kelley AshbyWho is Rand Paul dating in 2022?Relationship statusMarried (Since1990)SexualityStraightCurrent Wife of Rand PaulKelley AshbyEx-girlfriends or ex-wivesHas any kids?No Will the marriage of American politician Rand Paul and current Wife, Kelley Ashby survive 2022?

These Are The 15 Hottest Wives And Girlfriends Of Hollywood!

This friendly politician originating from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States has a slim body & square face type.

Read more from the original source:
Rand Paul 2022: Wife, net worth, tattoos, smoking & body facts - Taddlr

Charles Booker on Kentucky Senate race to unseat privileged, spoiled brat Rand Paul and make Black history – TheGrio

Kentucky Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate Charles Booker has already made history. After winning his primary election in June, Booker became the first Black person to be a major party nominee for Senate in the Bluegrass State. Now, Booker is hoping to unseat Republican Sen. Rand Paul in the November midterm election.

Were on a path to not only beat Rand Paul, but win our future, Booker told theGrio during a recent interview.

The 37-year-old lifelong Kentuckian, who comes from a long line of ministers, was Kentuckys youngest Black state lawmaker when he was elected in 2018. Booker, who ran unsuccessfully for the Democratic Senate nomination in 2020, sees his campaign as an opportunity to make Black history yet again as Kentuckys first elected Black U.S. senator. He also seeks to rise above partisan politics to address issues he believes all Kentuckians can support like halting hate, ending poverty, investing in solid infrastructure, and making health care more affordable.

Booker, who said he is proud of the history hes already made in this race, injects an aspirational and unifying tone familiar to Barack Obama, which earned the former president the kind of broad coalition support Booker will need to win a statewide election in Kentucky. The red state hasnt elected a Democrat to the U.S. Senate in nearly 25 years and has voted for every Republican presidential candidate since 2000.

My hope is that we can inspire people all over Kentucky, and across the country, to know that their voices matter democracy is still worth fighting for, and that we can defy the odds at a time when division is so high [and] hatred and racism is so high, he said. It would mean a lot to send this type of message for the country.

Growing up in one of the poorest zip codes in one of the most impoverished states in America, Booker said a major focus of his campaign is addressing poverty, which affects hundreds of thousands of Kentuckians, white and Black.

Poverty is generational in Kentucky, declared the Senate nominee, who introduced his Kentucky New Deal agenda to address economic challenges in his state.

The reason why this campaign is so powerful is because were speaking to the issues from a real place, he explained. Im a Type 1 diabetic. Ive had to ration my insulin because we couldnt afford it. And diabetes is not a partisan thing. The challenges of putting food on the table are not actually partisan. And by telling that story, were motivating and mobilizing people that voted for Trump, Bernie Sanders [and those who] never voted before.

While Booker is unifying in his message, he is also not shy to call out his Republican opponent. The Democrat said Paul, the son of a former U.S. congressman and physician, doesnt understand the economic hardships that he and other Kentuckians have endured.

He is someone who is essentially a privileged, spoiled brat, said Booker. He doesnt think he belongs or is responsible to anyone. He doesnt see the struggles that we face because he hasnt lived them. And quite honestly, he has sold us out.

Earlier this year, Booker went viral for a campaign ad invoking the imagery of a noose in which he called Paul out for once comparing expanded health care to slavery, saying he opposed aspects of the Civil Rights Act and voted against a version of the Emmett Till Antilynching Act in 2020 at the height of the George Floyd uprisings in protest of racial injustice and police brutality. Paul later co-sponsored a revised version of the anti-lynching bill in 2022 that was signed into law by President Joe Biden.

Rand Paul has built a career out of weaponizing hate and hiding his hand, said Booker, who noted that the Republican lawmaker also voted alongside GOP senators to block a domestic terrorism bill after the mass shooting of nine African Americans inside a grocery store in Buffalo, New York, earlier this year. He doesnt think racism is a problem, and we cant fix what we dont face.

As the United States grapples with political divisions, Booker said the country is currently fighting for healing just as much as were fighting to beat back fascism and secure our pursuit of democracy. He declared that his campaign is building a movement he calls a new Southern strategy.

This campaign is a testament to regular people from the hood, to the holler, I always say folks from the forgotten places, people that have felt like democracy didnt account for them, that justice didnt see them, [or] folks who were sort of accepting the struggles, not realizing that we can move them, that we can change them, said Booker.

A lot is riding on this Novembers elections for Democrats, who are seeking to hold onto their slim majority in Congress, particularly in the Senate. President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris in recent months have been giving speeches across the country urging voters to elect more Democrats in the Senate in order to eliminate the Senate filibuster and pass Democratic agenda items like voting rights reform and federal abortion rights.

Democrats hope that Senate nominees like Booker will be successful on Nov. 8, which would give them the numbers they need to bypass some of the roadblocks created by conservative Democratic senators like Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona.

While he supports the Democratic Partys mainstream agenda like abolishing the filibuster and unpacking the Supreme Court, Booker is also leaning in on the nonpartisan items of his Kentucky New Deal to invest in the states infrastructure, create sustainable jobs, putting more money in the pockets of regular people, protecting social security, [and] making sure everyone has quality health care.

We can do those things in very short order by expanding the majority in the Senate, said Booker. Winning this seat, getting rid of Rand Paul and expanding the majority means we can do a lot of good.

Gerren Keith Gaynor is the Managing Editor of Politics and Washington Correspondent at theGrio. He is based in Washington, D.C.

TheGrio is FREE on your TV via Apple TV, Amazon Fire, Roku and Android TV. Also,please download theGrio mobile appstoday!

Go here to read the rest:
Charles Booker on Kentucky Senate race to unseat privileged, spoiled brat Rand Paul and make Black history - TheGrio

Graham ignites abortion firestorm: Washington photos of the week – Washington Examiner

Divisions on abortion were on display in Congress this week as both the House and Senate returned to Washington, D.C., after a lengthy summer recess.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) on Tuesday introduced a national abortion ban after 15 weeks of pregnancy, with exceptions for rape, incest, and the life of the mother. The proposal drew a quick rebuke from Democrats campaigning on expanded abortion access and disagreement from fellow Republicans who want to leave abortion decisions up to states.

Also this week, Peiter "Mudge" Zatko, the Twitter whistleblower, testified before Congress that federal regulators are not powerful enough to deal with Big Tech companies like Twitter. And Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) once again squared off with Dr. Anthony Fauci at a Senate hearing.

Here's a look at scenes from the Capitol the week of Sept. 12, captured by Washington Examiner photographer Graeme Jennings.

Sen. Lindsey Graham unveils his nationwide abortion ban

GRAEME JENNINGS

Graeme Jennings/Graeme Jennings

Twitter whistleblower Peiter 'Mudge' Zatko testifies before Congress

Graeme Jennings/Graeme Jennings

Graeme Jennings/Graeme Jennings

Dr. Anthony Fauci faces off with Sen. Rand Paul, again

Graeme Jennings/Graeme Jennings

Graeme Jennings/Graeme Jennings

Sen. Bernie Sanders blocks GOP proposal to force rail unions to avert labor strike

Graeme Jennings/Graeme Jennings

Jan. 6 committee members face questions on plans for next hearing

Graeme Jennings/Graeme Jennings

Graeme Jennings/Graeme Jennings

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene accused of kicking activist

Graeme Jennings/Graeme Jennings

Visit link:
Graham ignites abortion firestorm: Washington photos of the week - Washington Examiner

Rand Paul threatens to investigate royalties to Fauci, other officials, if GOP takes Senate – Fox News

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., accused government health officials of taking a wrong approach in evaluating COVID-19 vaccines by failing to take into account people's previous infections.

The Kentucky Republican then implied that there could be a reason for this. Stating that government vaccine committee members have not disclosed what, if any, royalties they have received from companies that make the vaccines, Paul said that if the GOP takes control of the Senate in November's midterm elections they will investigate the matter.

"We've been asking you and you refused to answer whether anybody on the vaccine committees gets royalties from the pharmaceutical companies," Paul said Wednesday to Dr. Anthony Fauci during a Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee hearing. "I asked you last time, and what was your response? We don't have to tell you. We've demanded them through the Freedom of Information Act. And what have you said? We're not going to tell you. But I tell you this, when we get in charge, we're going to change the rules and you will have to divulge where you get your royalties from, from what companies, and if anybody in the committee has a conflict of interest, we're going to learn about it. I promise you that."

Fauci responded by saying that those committees are advisory committees with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA), yet Paul keeps asking about him.

RAND PAUL BLASTS FAUCI AFTER JUDGE DEMANDS MISINFORMATION EMAILS: AMERICA SHOULD BE APPALLED

Paul responded by saying that Fauci himself has refused to say which companies, if any, gave him royalties, or paid royalties to other scientists.

"They are not my committees," Fauci reiterated, without addressing Paul's claim that Fauci himself has not been transparent.

Dr. Anthony Fauci is stepping down from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. (Getty Images)

The discussion of royalties from pharmaceutical companies stemmed from Paul's claim that Fauci and other officials were not following established science because they were ignoring the effects of COVID-19 infections when looking at vaccines. He began his segment by showing an interview Fauci gave in 2004, in which he said regarding the flu that "the best vaccination is to get infected yourself."

Paul asked Fauci why that same idea does not appear to be reflected in the government's approach to COVID-19.

WHITE HOUSE WANTS SIMULTANEOUS COVID, FLU SHOTS: THIS IS WHY GOD GAVE US TWO ARMS

"Currently, antibody surveys show that 80 percent of children, approximately 80 percent of children, have had COVID, and yet there are no guidelines coming from you or anybody in the government to take into account their naturally acquired immunity," the senator said, adding that death rates from COVID-19 are similar "if not less than that" of the flu.

"So when we look at this, we wonder, you know, why you seemed to really embrace basic immunology back in 2004, how you or why you seem to reject it now," Paul said.

Fauci denied rejecting basic immunology and said he "never denied that there is the importance of the protection following infection." Still, he said the FDA and CDC support the idea that "vaccination following infection gives an added extra boost."

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

The problem, Paul said, is that "almost none of your studies from the CDC or from the government have the variable of whether or not you've been previously infected."

"If you ignore whether they've been infected, you're ignoring a vaccine, basically," he added.

The rest is here:
Rand Paul threatens to investigate royalties to Fauci, other officials, if GOP takes Senate - Fox News

Congress races to reauthorize innovation grants favored by Pentagon – DefenseNews.com

WASHINGTON With a small business innovation grant program favored by the Pentagon set to expire this month, Congress is racing to draft compromise reauthorization legislation that addresses concerns about companies abusing the awards process.

Democrats and Republicans on the Small Business committees in both the House and Senate convened a so-called four corners meeting this week to negotiate draft legislation, which is in its final stages.

Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer, R-Mo., the ranking member on the House Small Business Committee, said Thursday that the committees hope to finish drafting legislation that reauthorizes the Small Business Administrations Innovation Research and Technology Transfer awards which are made jointly with 11 federal agencies by the end of the week.

Weve got a general agreement already with the four corners on this, but the devils always in the details, he told Defense News. We want to make sure that what comes out in text is what we agreed to in concept.

Were knocking out the text as we speak, so everyone can see it today or tomorrow, Luetkemeyer added. Hopefully next week we can our side of the bill firmed it up and get it through.

Both Rep. Nydia Velazquez, D-N.Y., and Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md., who chair the Small Business Committee in their respective chambers, noted that negotiators have made a lot of progress on the compromise reauthorization.

Velazquez told Defense News that she feels optimistic and that she expects final legislation soon.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., the ranking member on the Senate Small Business Committee, downplayed the negotiations on Wednesday and told Defense News that they have not assuaged his concerns.

Paul has argued that the program lacks protections against ties between program awardees and China, and that some companies rely entirely on SBIR grants to sustain themselves without spinning off new businesses or products.

Dr. Paul will not reauthorize this program without reforms to strengthen research security and stop abusive behavior by bad actors lining their pockets with taxpayer dollars at the expense of new small businesses with emerging technologies being able to access SBIR awards, a spokesperson for the senator told Defense News in June.

Reauthorization of the program was originally included in an earlier version of the CHIPS and Science bill, but the provision was not included in the final version of the legislation that passed in July.

The total budget for the 40-year-old program ballooned to nearly $3.3 billion in 2019, with the Department of Defense accounting for the majority of the awards. Individual grants range from tens of thousands of dollars to more than a million for a two-year grant.

SBIR provides funding in three phases, with grant amounts typically increasing throughout each stage. For defense SBIR awards, companies are eligible to submit multiple project ideas, which some say leads to companies applying for multiple Phase I awards without ever maturing the proposed technology.

Were trying to find ways to incentivize and do the work yet provide the oversight to continue to do the work not just ripping off the program to continue to get these grants and at the end of the day theyre just making money, but theyre not actually producing products, said Luetkemeyer.

For some entities, for some different departments, there arent that many alternatives to go toto be able to produce or develop a particular product or service for the Defense Department he added. Weve got to be very careful that we dont preclude the ability of companies to be able to meet our defense needs by hamstringing this bill.

Kea Matory, director of legislative policy at the National Defense Industrial Association trade group, said in an interview that criticisms of awarding companies too many Phase I grants signal contrasting standards for small and large companies.

Lots of our bigs get multiple awards, she said. We would never tell one of our large primes oh, youve had too many, you need to sit down.

Matory added that delays in reauthorizing the program are already impacting small businesses.

A lot of them are already hearing that SBIR could go away, she said. Its like a game of telephone as it gets passed along to each person; it sounds more doomsday.

When it comes to innovation, small businesses frequently bring new ideas to the table that could help the Pentagon with its modernization goals, she said. Without SBIR, many of those companies would be disincentivized to want to do business in the government and defense sectors.

The Pentagon will not award new SBIR grants starting Oct. 1 if the legislators fail to reauthorize the program. Ongoing contracts may continue but will not receive further SBIR/STTR funding.

If the draft legislation wins over Paul, the House and Senate could reauthorize SBIR as stand-alone legislation by the end of the month.

And if that doesnt work, Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Jack Reed, D-R.I., told the Defense News conference that negotiations are also underway to include SBIR reauthorization in the continuing resolution that Congress needs to pass by the end of the month in order to fund the government and avoid a shutdown.

I would prefer that we get reauthorization as a stand-alone bill versus just a straight reauthorization where we stick it into a [continuing resolution], said Luetkemeyer. That really doesnt solve problems. It extends the same problems that we have now.

As a last resort, Congress could reauthorize the program in the Fiscal 2023 National Defense Authorization Act although Congress is unlikely to finalize that legislation until after the SBIR/STTR grants expire.

The House NDAA, which passed 329-101 in July, has a provision that reauthorizes the program without any changes. The Senate must still pass its version of the bill before both chambers agree on final legislation a process that usually takes several weeks.

Bryant Harris is the Congress reporter for Defense News. He has covered U.S. foreign policy, national security, international affairs and politics in Washington since 2014. He has also written for Foreign Policy, Al-Monitor, Al Jazeera English and IPS News.

Catherine Buchaniec is a reporter at C4ISRNET, where she covers artificial intelligence, cyber warfare and uncrewed technologies.

See the article here:
Congress races to reauthorize innovation grants favored by Pentagon - DefenseNews.com