Archive for the ‘Rand Paul’ Category

American women will soon become eligible (in theory) for the draft – The Economist

Sep 18th 2021

Washington, DC

MASS CONSCRIPTION in wartime is a remote prospect in America. But were a draft called, the countrys conscripts might soon look very different. An amendment to the annual defence policy bill winding its way through Congress would make women eligible for the military draft for the first time. On September 2nd it passed the House Armed Services Committee. Its past time, declared Congresswoman Chrissy Houlahan, a former Air Force officer and lead sponsor of the amendment. Coupled with the success of a similar provision in the Senate, the change is now almost certain to become law when the final bill comes to a vote.

Your browser does not support the

Enjoy more audio and podcasts on iOS or Android.

Though the compulsory military draft ended in 1973, controversy over who could be called to serve did not. Conscription was so unpopular in the wake of the Vietnam war that after 1975 men were not even required to register for the Selective Service, the directory of those eligible to be drafted. The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 prompted President Jimmy Carter to reinstate the requirement for men, but Congress balked at the potential inclusion of women. The 1981 Supreme Court decision in Rostker v Goldberg found that, because women were not allowed to serve in combat roles, they could be excluded from the Selective Service. This argument began to look thin even before Leigh Ann Hester became the first woman to receive the silver star for direct combat action in 2005, after her convoy was ambushed in Iraq.

When President Barack Obama opened combat roles to women in 2015, the legal logic barring women from the draft came undone. Putting women in combat was initially met with resistance. Republicans argued it would undermine the cohesiveness of Americas armed forces and former generals voiced concerns. But President Donald Trump left the reform untouched, and the controversy faded. Katherine Kuzminski of the Centre for American Security, a think-tank, suggests womens battlefield experience during the war on terror did much to convince Americas military brass that women were essential. With the decision in Rostker a dead letter, lawsuits advanced to overturn womens exclusion. In April, President Joe Biden asked the Supreme Court to allow Congress to resolve the issue.

Lawmakers on Capitol Hill are now deploying several progressive arguments in favour of drafting women. Standing in for fellow Democrats, Ms Houlahan introduced the amendment by saying that, as the selective service system is currently written, it is unconstitutional and discriminates based on sex. Republican proponents like Congressman Mike Waltz, also a sponsor of the amendment, make a practical case. They echo Americas generals in arguing that women are needed should a draft ever be calleda necessity when less than a third of the adult population is considered fit for service. Opposition comes from a handful of social conservatives, who believe that including women in the draft would undermine traditional gender roles.

Yet this bipartisan consensus is notable for how little support it has in public opinion, particularly among women. While a little more than half of men endorse drafting women, just 36% of women do so. Kara Vuic, a historian at Texas Christian University, notes that the first push for women in the draft in the early 1970s was paired with feminist promotion of the Equal Rights Amendment, a proposed constitutional amendment guaranteeing womens rights. Conscription was viewed as an obligation of full citizenship. Today, she observes, the change is not being led by women alone. The nature of war in the 21st century is very different, and the military needs women. For Ms Vuic, the Pentagons increasingly vocal support is decisive.

Expanding the draft would mean that almost no legal restrictions remain for women in the armed forces. But a broader debate over the future of the military draft continues. Senators Ron Wyden and Rand Paul have proposed abolishing the Selective Service entirely. Others bemoan the increasing cultural gap between soldiers and civilians, calling for a revival of compulsory national service. Such differences are less easily bridged.

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline "XX-rated"

Read the original here:
American women will soon become eligible (in theory) for the draft - The Economist

Rand Paul says Fauci deserves a five-year prison sentence | TheHill – The Hill

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) intensified his criticism of Anthony Fauci, claiming Wednesday that the nations top infectious diseases expert lied to Congress and should face a five-year prison sentence.

The senator has claimed for months that Fauci, who serves as the president's chief medical adviser and the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, lied to Congress about whether the National Institute of Health (NIH) funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Mediate reported. Gain-of-function research refers to the process of changing pathogens to test scientific theories, develop technologies and find treatments.

Paul made the claims again on Fox News this week.

Its a felony punishable by five years in jail, Paul said in an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity. I dont think Biden Department of Justice will do anything with it, but it is very dangerous to have public officials who we need to have trust incoming and lying to us. But he has lied dozens of times. Usually, he tells us its for our own good.

America is changing faster than ever! Add Changing America to your Facebook or Twitter feed to stay on top of the news.

As Changing America previously reported, Rand referred Fauci to the Justice Department in July.

That same month, Rand escalated his clash with Fauci during a Senate hearing. The senator suggested that Fauci and the NIH could be somewhat responsible for the pandemic and he cited a paper that alleges that the lab was conducting illegal research, a claim that Fauci denied.

I totally resent the lie you are now propagating, senator, Fauci said.

Paul interjected, saying: You are obviously obfuscating the truth.

Fauci replied, I'm not obfuscating the truth -- you are. He continued: You are implying that what we did was responsible for the deaths of individuals. I totally resent that...And if anybody is lying here senator, it is you.

He has dissembled, Paul said in Wednesdays interview. He has obfuscated. There are other, nicer words, but he has definitely lied to the American public, and he should be held responsible. But not just that the judgment that we should continue to fund this lab and the virus that in all likelihood came from the lab, I think it is such incredibly poor judgment that he should be immediately removed.

The theory that the coronavirus leaked from a lab has been dismissed in the past, but is gaining traction as a possible explanation for the origins of the virus.

READ MORE STORIES FROM CHANGING AMERICA

FAUCI SAYS HES KEEPING A VERY CLOSE EYE ON NEW COVID-19 VARIANT

TUCKER CARLSON DEFENDS FAKE VACCINATION CARDS

KIM JONG UN TURNS DOWN VACCINES, INSISTS ON FIGHTING PANDEMIC IN OUR STYLE

BOOSTER SHOTS MAY ONLY BE AVAILABLE TO PFIZER VACCINE RECIPIENTS AT FIRST, OFFICIALS SAY

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE NEW COVID-19 VARIANT C.1.2 DETECTED IN SOUTH AFRICA

RAND PAUL SAYS HATRED FOR TRUMP IS STOPPING STUDY OF HORSE AND HUMAN DRUG TO TREAT COVID-19

STUDY SAYS NEW LAMBDA VARIANT COULD BE VACCINE-RESISTANT

AMERICAN ARCHBISHOP IS DISTRIBUTING BLEACH AS MIRACLE CURE FOR COVID-19

Read more from the original source:
Rand Paul says Fauci deserves a five-year prison sentence | TheHill - The Hill

‘Culture war BS’: Rand Paul’s gun wall tweet backfires when Twitter flips the script on him – Raw Story

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) found himself at the center of a Twitter storm almost immediately after tweeting a seemingly odd photo of himself at a gun shop.

While he attempted to throw a subliminal jab at President Joe Biden, Twitter users began throwing not-so-subliminal jabs at him. On Thursday, September 9, the Republican lawmaker took to Twitter with the photo of himself and a caption that read: "Just looking at all the guns @joebiden is going to try to ban"

It didn't take long for opposing Twitter users to fire back. One in particular was Parkland, Fla., mass shooting survivor David Hogg.

Hitting back at Paul, he tweeted, "God forbid someone like the 19 year old who shot 34 of my classmates and administrators killing 17 not be able to get an AR-15."

Other users also joined in:

For years now, Republicans have expressed concern about Democrats taking guns away but the truth is, it has typically been the other way around with Republican administration's being responsible for stipulations on firearms. In fact, former President Donald Trump's administration imposed the ban on bump stocks back in 2018.

At the time, the Republican-led administration released information about the newly-implemented regulation.

"With limited exceptions, the Gun Control Act, as amended, makes it unlawful for any person to transfer or possess a machine-gun unless it was lawfully possessed prior to the effective date of the statute," the new regulation states. "The bump-stock-type devices covered by this final rule were not in existence prior to the effective date of the statute, and therefore will be prohibited when this rule becomes effective."

Excerpt from:
'Culture war BS': Rand Paul's gun wall tweet backfires when Twitter flips the script on him - Raw Story

The problems that Nicki Minaj caused for the vaccination effort Poynter – Poynter

Covering COVID-19 is a daily Poynter briefing of story ideas about the coronavirus and other timely topics for journalists, written by senior faculty Al Tompkins. Sign up here to have it delivered to your inbox every weekday morning.

This does not help. Because Nicki Minaj sent a tweet to her 22.6 million Twitter followers, we now shall spend a few paragraphs telling unvaccinated young males that there is no evidence that the COVID-19 vaccine will harm their testicles or fertility.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reiterated that there are no known side effects from the COVID-19 vaccine like swollen testicles or fertility issues. None. The CDC says:

Currently no evidence shows that any vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines, cause male fertility problems. A recent small study of 45 healthy men who received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (i.e., Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna) looked at sperm characteristics, like quantity and movement, before and after vaccination. Researchers found no significant changes in these sperm characteristics after vaccination.

Fever from illness has been associated with short-term decrease in sperm production in healthy men. Although fever can be a side effect of COVID-19 vaccination, there is no current evidence that fever after COVID-vaccination affects sperm production.

Twitter made a big announcement in March that it would attach warning labels to tweets that contain false information about COVID-19. Twitter did not block this post or this poster.

Later, Minaj added that she is still uncertain about taking the vaccine.

She then said she was leaning toward getting vaccinated.

Ill add one more piece of information to this conversation. While there is no proof that the vaccination is connected to erectile dysfunction or male infertility, there is evidence that getting the virus can cause those problems.

Senator Rand Paul of Ky., addresses the audience at the Kentucky Farm Bureau Ham Breakfast at the Kentucky State Fair in Louisville, Ky., Thursday, Aug. 26, 2021. (AP Photo/Timothy D. Easley)

Three medical groups the American Board of Family Medicine, the American Board of Internal Medicine and the American Board of Pediatrics are warning physicians who spread false information about COVID-19 that they could lose their licenses. But, so far, it is all talk and no action.

We also want all physicians certified by our boards to know that such unethical or unprofessional conduct may prompt their respective board to take action that could put their certification at risk, the boards wrote.

Not long ago, the Federation of State Medical Boards warned that physicians who spread COVID-19 rumors could lose their state licenses. Now, the professional associations say they could lose their board credentials.

The Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure adopted a new policy last week saying physicians have an ethical and professional responsibility to act in the best interest of their patients and, Spreading inaccurate COVID-19 vaccine information contradicts that responsibility, threatens to further erode public trust in the medical profession and puts all patients at risk. And, the policy adds, Physicians must understand that actions online and content posted can affect their reputation, have consequences for their medical careers, and undermine public trust in the medical profession.

The Tribune News Service put the story in perspective:

Experts fear that a deepening distrust of expertise among many Americans, the reach offered by social media, and national politicians who promote bogus covid-19 theories are creating a welcoming environment for doctors and nurses who traffic in dangerous falsehoods that can be both alluring and bewildering given how quickly knowledge of covid-19 has evolved.

When are we talking about honest differences of opinion and when are we talking about a flagrant disregard of standards of care? asked Richard Baron, a doctor and head of the Philadelphia-based American Board of Internal Medicine. With respect to some of the behavior were seeing it really is in contravention of pretty solid professional science.

MedPage searched for an example of a tough-talking state taking action against a nonsense-spewing physician and could not find one. Not one.

Despite a national call to sanction doctors who spread COVID-19 misinformation, a MedPage Today investigation found that not one of 20 physicians whove peddled such falsehoods has been disciplined by their state licensing agency for doing so.

Thats not to say that complaints havent been filed, or that investigations havent been launched. These elements are confidential in most states, including the 10 contacted by MedPage Today who license the physicians.

But that means physicians who have advanced false COVID information including Simone Gold, MD, JD; Scott Atlas, MD; Joseph Mercola, DO; Lee Merritt, MD; Sherri Tenpenny, DO; and Stella Immanuel, MD are free to continue to misinform their patients and the public, even as the Delta variant surges.

Our statement is a reminder to physicians that words have consequences and during a public health emergency like COVID-19, those words can mean life or death for patients, Joe Knickrehm, vice president of communications for the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB), told MedPage Today via email.

Sen. Rand Paul, who is an ophthalmologist, also opposes COVID-19 vaccines and claims cloth masks are not useful in controlling the spread of the virus. YouTube suspended him from its platform for making false statements. And despite false online rumors that the American Medical Association took action against him, Paul is still licensed to practice medicine. For one thing, the AMA does not license physicians. States do.

One of the ways that we have come to understand the severity of the pandemic is to see how many people are hospitalized with COVID-19. But researchers have wondered if that is such a good measure since the data shows us how many are hospitalized but not how severely ill those patients are. The Atlantic explains what they found:

The study found that from March 2020 through early January 2021before vaccination was widespread, and before the Delta variant had arrivedthe proportion of patients with mild or asymptomatic disease was 36 percent. From mid-January through the end of June 2021, however, that number rose to 48 percent. In other words, the study suggests that roughly half of all the hospitalized patients showing up on COVID-data dashboards in 2021 may have been admitted for another reason entirely or had only a mild presentation of disease.

This increase was even bigger for vaccinated hospital patients, of whom 57 percent had mild or asymptomatic disease. But unvaccinated patients have also been showing up with less severe symptoms, on average, than earlier in the pandemic: The study found that 45 percent of their cases were mild or asymptomatic since January 21. According to Shira Doron, an infectious-disease physician and hospital epidemiologist at Tufts Medical Center, in Boston, and one of the studys co-authors, the latter finding may be explained by the fact that unvaccinated patients in the vaccine era tend to be a younger cohort who are less vulnerable to COVID and may be more likely to have been infected in the past.

A little disclaimer about this study. First, it was done on Veterans Affairs patients, meaning it includes relatively few women and no children. Second, the data comes from patients who were infected before the delta variant was widespread, so it is possible that the wave hospitalized now are sicker than those in the test.

The most we can pull from this is that hospitalizations, taken alone, may not tell us as much as they might seem to be saying.

Just as the committee that advises the Food and Drug Administration about vaccine safety and effectiveness is about to meet, two outgoing FDA vaccine regulators are saying that there is not a compelling reason (yet) to administer COVID-19 booster shots to the general public.

The Lancet, a respected medical journal, just published the paper by Marion Gruber and Phil Krause, who have been leading the FDAs vaccine approval process but announced they will be leaving the FDA soon. The key quote from the paper is, Current evidence does not, therefore, appear to show a need for boosting in the general population, in which efficacy against severe disease remains high.

The paper says that everyone may need a COVID-19 vaccination booster in the future, but for now, the vaccine is doing a good job.

There is general agreement that people with compromised immune systems, such as cancer patients, would benefit from booster vaccinations. There is also some agreement that a booster would benefit senior citizens. But that is where the agreement ends. Heres a good background article from PolitiFact.

In Colorado, educators say they could face arrest and criminal prosecution if they fail to wear masks and enforce mask mandates. The local district attorney in Littleton says such charges are possible, but no complaints or charges are being considered at the moment.

A student wears hand sanitizer at Tussahaw Elementary school on Wednesday, Aug. 4, 2021, in McDonough, Ga. (AP Photo/Brynn Anderson)

KDKA Pittsburgh gives us something new to worry about:

Dr. Michael Lynch, head of the Pittsburgh Poison Center, says theres been an increase of kids ingesting hand sanitizer.

In Pennsylvania, in the last 18 months, more or less since the start of the pandemic, weve seen a 56% increase in hand sanitizer exposure cases compared to the 18 months prior to that, he said.

Dr. Lynch says that amounts to about 2,300 cases, most under the age of 5, and about 6% of those kids needed to go to the hospital.

Hand sanitizers will typically have 70% or so ethanol, which means theyre about 140 proof, Dr. Lynch said. Even a small amount can be enough to get intoxicated.

Make of this what you will. TV Newser reports:

Fox Corp. human resources chief Kevin Lord sent out a memo to staff Tuesday saying more than 90% of our full-time employees reported that they are fully vaccinated after the company mandated everyone report their vaccination status.

Lord added that the company will soon introduce daily COVID testing for the small group of employees who are not vaccinated or have not provided their vaccination status.

Consulting firm KPMG surveyed more than 100 retail executives and heard that there are going to be lots of warehouse, delivery and retail jobs open this holiday shopping season. UPS alone is planning to hire 100,000 part-time and full-time seasonal workers. The U.S. Postal Service says it will add 40,000 workers this fall. Discount retailers like Kohls and Michaels also say they will hire tens of thousands of seasonal workers because they expect people to be in a spending mood this year.

Crab cake potato stacks made with Old Bay Seasoning are seen on Nov. 9, 2010, in Concord, N.H. (AP Photo/Larry Crowe)

Axios Charlotte reports:

A national crabmeat shortage has caused a 40-50% drop in business for the owners of Lulus Maryland-Style Chicken and Seafood. Every week it seems, they encounter another angry customer whos come to bite into the jumbo lump hype, only to be disappointed.

Ive had to say this so many times: Were not turning them away because we dont want to give it to them, Jay tells me. Were turning the away because we dont have it.

NPR says there are lots of reasons for the shortage that has driven prices up 50%, including fewer fishermen, a shortage of truck drivers and imports being interrupted by shipping problems.

Some restaurants are controlling prices by shrinking the size of crab cakes. If you are still paying the same price now as you were a year ago, Axios says youre probably eating way more cake than crab.

Old restaurant joke: Why do crabs never give waiters a tip? Because theyre shellfish.

Im here all week.

Well be back tomorrow with a new edition of Covering COVID-19. Are you subscribed? Sign up hereto get it delivered right to your inbox.

See the original post:
The problems that Nicki Minaj caused for the vaccination effort Poynter - Poynter

Rand Paul undecided on ivermectin to treat COVID-19, says hatred of Trump hinders research – Courier Journal

COLD SPRING, Ky. Hatred of former President Donald Trump has kept researchers from looking into the anti-parasitic drug ivermectin andother drugs to treat COVID-19,Republican Kentucky Sen. Rand Paultold constituents on Friday.

TheFood and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have warned peopleusing ivermectin,a drug used to treat parasitic worm infections in humans and livestock, is dangerous. The FDA went as far as tweeting out a reminderon August 21, "You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it."

But Paul encouraged more research.

"The hatred for Trump deranged these people so much, that they're unwilling to objectively study it," Paul said to the 60 people squeezed into the Cold Spring CityCouncil chambers in this Northern Kentucky suburb just south of Cincinnati."So someone like me that's in the middle on it, I can't tell you because they will not study ivermectin. They will not study hydroxychloroquine without the taint of their hatred for Donald Trump."

More: Can Kentucky medical professionals lose their licenses if they spread disputed COVID claims?

It's also why they don't research hydroxychloroquine, he said, an anti-malarial drug touted by Trump as a treatment.

TheWorld Health Organizationin April foundbased on six clinical trials thathydroxychloroquine"had little or no effect on preventing illness, hospitalization or death from COVID-19."

A woman in the audience had asked Paul, an ophthalmologist, why ivermectin wasn't more available.The woman said she had some ivermectin stashed away "just in case."

Paul told her he didn't know if it works because there isn't enough research.When asked by The Enquirer after the meetings about the FDA and CDC warnings on ivermectin, Paul reiterated what he said in the town hall

"I don't know if it works, but I keep an open mind," Paul said.

One treatment Paul and the nation's top infectious disease expert agree on ismonoclonal antibodies to treat COVID-19 in the early stages of the infection.But other than that, Dr. Anthony Fauci and Paul don't get along andhave had very public clashes over the nation's COVID-19 response.

Paul spent a large portion of the town hall criticizing vaccine and mask mandates. Paul encouraged older people to get vaccinated but said it's a personal choice. Those who already had COVID-19, like Paul who contracted the disease last year,don't need it, Paul said.

More: COVID misinformation or skepticism? Kentucky's Rand Paul, Thomas Massie keep hammering away

Astudy published in early August by the CDC foundunvaccinated people who have had COVID-19 are more than twice as likely to be reinfected with the virus compared with people who were fully vaccinated after contracting the virus.

Paul did encourage older people to get vaccinated but maintained his stance that it's personal choice and shouldn't be mandated.

"I think I'm in the middle ground of the vaccines," Paul said. "CNN invites me on all the time. They have announcers calling me an 'ass' on TV. Then they have doctors saying I'm thoroughly anti-vaccine. You heard me, I'm not against the vaccine. I've already recommended if you're at risk to take it...It's still your choice if its a free country."

Read more here:
Rand Paul undecided on ivermectin to treat COVID-19, says hatred of Trump hinders research - Courier Journal