Archive for the ‘Rand Paul’ Category

Sen. Rand Paul: Attack Shows Need to Secure US Borders – Newsmax

Monday's terrorist attack in Manchester, England, shows "we're never really safe at any moment" in the United States as well as in Europe, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said Tuesday.

"I think it illustrates that what we need to do as our first line of defense is defend our borders and be careful who we let visit our country and who we let come to live in our country," the Paulcan told Fox News' "America's Newsroom."

Paul said his words of caution do not mean he does not want to have a "great mixture" of people coming into the United States, but still, he cautioned it is important to make sure who is coming in.

The second version of President Donald Trump's travel ban is tied up in the courts because of claims it is discriminatory, but Paul said there are ways to enact a travel ban while still allowing people who can pass a background check to enter without banning travel from certain countries altogether.

"I also offered a way for frequent travelers to get part of a program, something called global entry, like the frequent travel program that we have here in this country," Paul said. "I would like to do that internationally."

He explained,even in countries perceived as risks, such as Iran or Syria, "we could find people who are traditional businessmen and women go through a background check and even in those countries that are risk for us."

It might also make a difference for travelers to already have a sponsor in the United States, if the person traveling would not fall within certain risk categories, Paul said.

"If you are a 19-year-old male from the Middle East, we might be worried," the senator said. "If you're an 80-year-old mother-in-law," that could be different.

At the same time, the United States cannot "just have an open border" for people coming from the Middle East.

"A lot of security isn't necessarily checking you on the plane," Paul said. "We have to do some of that, but check who you are related to and who you know and doing a background check. There are people who, for cultural and educational reasons, we want to exchange with the Middle East."

Paul also discussed getting the United States out of the Paris Climate Agreement, which was signed by former President Barack Obama.

"Congress didn't vote on it," Paul said."I object to signing away our rights to some international body when Congress doesn't even vote on it. There are estimates we could lose over six million jobs in the Paris accord and cost $3 trillion. That's not good for my state of Kentucky, but it's also just not good for the United States."

2017 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Continued here:
Sen. Rand Paul: Attack Shows Need to Secure US Borders - Newsmax

Rand Paul to Introduce Resolution Urging Withdrawal from Paris Climate Agreement – The Libertarian Republic

LISTEN TO TLRS LATEST PODCAST:

By Kody Fairfield

Rand Paul, one of the Republican Senators from Kentucky, is said to be introducing a resolution that with urge the United States withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement.

The Paris Climate agreement, recognized by former PresidentBarack Obama in 2016, was an agreement within theUnited Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and whose main goal was to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.

Critics of the agreementsuch are PresidentDonald Trump, have called the agreement one-sided and that it ignores that implications on the US economy.

In a statement released on Monday, Sen. Paul explained thatexperts predict that by the year 2040, the agreement could cost the American economy up to 6.5 million jobs and nearly $3 trillion in Gross Domestic Product,with no guarantee of significantly reducing the global temperature by 2100.

We are being asked to place more regulatory burdens on American businesses and our economy, said Sen. Paul. Despite the high cost, the agreement will do little to solve environmental challenges. I support a path forward that protects both our jobs and our environment instead of sacrificing one for the other.

Pauls resolution is supported by fellow Senators Jim Inhofe (R-OK), Roger Wicker (R-MS), James Risch (R-ID), MikeEnzi (R-WY), and OrrinHatch (R-UT). Rep. David McKinley (R-WV) has introduced companion legislation (H. Con. Res. 55) in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Paris Agreement Resolution by Sen. Rand Paul by Kody Fairfield on Scribd

Prager U makes a similar argument in this video.

Barack ObamaDavid McKinleyJames RischJim InhofeMike EnziOrrin HatchParis climate agreementRoger Wicker

Read more from the original source:
Rand Paul to Introduce Resolution Urging Withdrawal from Paris Climate Agreement - The Libertarian Republic

Rand Paul sees ‘uphill battle’ for criminal justice reform under Trump – Washington Examiner

Sen. Rand Paul said Wednesday that it would be an "uphill battle" to get the Trump administration on board with criminal justice reform.

In a press call with reporters about his latest legislation, the Justice Safety Valve Act, the Kentucky Republican said despite the lack of "sympathy" for criminal justice reform in President Trump's White House, he is "having conversations with people" in the administration who are willing to listen to what he has to say.

The Justice Safety Valve Act, introduced by Paul, Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., would give federal judges the ability to impose sentences below mandatory minimums in appropriate cases, based on mitigating factors.

Similar legislation was introduced in the House this week.

The legislation goes against Attorney General Jeff Sessions' latest sentencing and charging memo. In that memo from last week, Sessions directed federal prosecutors to pursue the strictest charges and sentences in criminal cases.

"It's sending us in the wrong direction," Paul said of the memo. He added that he doesn't "particularly think the attorney general is sympathetic" of criminal justice reform.

Original post:
Rand Paul sees 'uphill battle' for criminal justice reform under Trump - Washington Examiner

Senate Moves Forward With Bipartisan Bill to Rein in Jeff Sessions – RollingStone.com

Bluntly calling out Attorney General Jeff Sessions' hard-line stance on criminal justice as "wrong," a "mistake" and "aggressive," Senators Rand Paul, a Republican from Kentucky, and Patrick Leahy, a Democrat from Vermont, have pledged to fight for sentencing reform.

"We've been working on trying to get rid of some of the injustice of mandatory minimums and give judges more discretion," Paul said in a telephone press conference Wednesday. The Justice Safety Valve Act, introduced to the Senate by Paul, Leahy and Oregon Democrat Jeff Merkley, would empower federal judges to give out sentences below the mandatory minimum in certain cases. The law could go a long way towards neutralizing Attorney General Jeff Sessions' memo, issued earlier this month, directing prosecutors to seek the toughest possible sentences, even in cases of non-violent drug offenders. The memo rolls back the criminal justice reforms that took place during the Obama administration.

At the time, Sessions defended the memo by citing President Trump's broadly-defined vow to protect the American public from threats both foreign and domestic. "This is a key part of President Trump's promise to keep America safe," Sessions said. "If you are a drug trafficker, we will not look the other way. We will not be willfully blind to your conduct."

Paul and Leahy pointed out that rather than keep Americans safe, the drug war Sessions seems eager to revive ties judges' hands and needlessly ruins lives, all while being very costly to taxpayers. "We know it doesn't work, now we're trying to get something done that does work," Paul said.

Paul listed a few examples of shocking prison terms handed down thanks to mandatory minimums. There's John Horner, a father of three serving 25 years for selling some of his own painkillers to a friend who turned out to be a police informant. There's Weldon Angelos, who got 55 years after getting caught selling some weed a drug that is legal in many parts of the country.

Leahy, a former prosecutor, emphasized the high cost of imprisoning so many people for so long, a strategy that has yet to rid America of either illegal drugs or crime.

"The idea that, 'We've got to stiffen the penalties and crime will stop,' we've found it doesn't work," Leahy said. "This is extraordinarily expensive... Then, there's less money to go to violent, serious crime."

Paul pointed out that putting more people in prison is also not a smart way to address opioid addiction. "In my opinion we should treat drug addiction more as a health crisis and less as an incarceration problem," he said. "There's a problem, but locking everyone up isn't the solution. Instead, "families, churches and communities" should band together to "cure the ravages of addiction," Paul said.

Criminal reform advocates largely support the Senate's sentencing reform efforts. Kevin Ring, President of Families Against Mandatory Minimums, tells Rolling Stone that the Justice Safety Valve Act goes further than previous bipartisan efforts to reform America's expensive, vastly overcrowded prison system.

"I think it's a pretty bold move that is an effective repeal of mandatory minimums," he says.

Plus, it's high time for Congress to nail down reforms. Sessions himself noted in the memo that his policy shift "simply utilizes the tools Congress has given us." So it's up to Congress to fix the situation by changing the law, Ring says.

"If [legislators] don't think these laws should be enforced, the answer is to take them away. Because if you give somebody a hammer, they're going to use it," Ring says.

It's not clear what would happen if Paul and Leahy manage to wrangle the bill through Senate and onto the President's desk. In typically schizoid fashion, the Trump administration has jumped all over the place on drug policy and criminal justice reform. The president's embrace of President Rodrigo Duterte, who unleashed literal death squads on his own people in a crusade to end drug use, does not bode well for sane drug policy issuing from the White House. Neither has Trump's repeated claim that building a wall between Mexico and the U.S. would solve the country's opioid crisis.

But Paul indicated that there are people in the administration who support reform. "If we get something out of the Senate there's a reasonable chance the President might sign it," he said. A companion bill is being introduced in the House of Representatives.

Bill Piper, Senior Director of the Drug Policy Alliance, tells Rolling Stone that this is a perfect opportunity for the White House to stake out a position on prison reform and show who's really steering America's criminal justice and drug policy.

"It's worth noting that there's a disconnect between Jeff Sessions and the President, and it's not clear who is actually in charge," Piper says. "The president put Jared Kushner in charge of his task force for looking at criminal justice reform Jeff Sessions preemptively undermined the work Jared Kushner is doing. So does the administration oppose reform? Because it's already clear where Jeff Sessions stands."

With the exception of outliers like Sessions, criminal justice reform is one of the few issues on which there's bipartisan consensus.

"This is not a Republican or Democrat idea, this is a common sense idea," Leahy said.

***

How to Contact:

Contact Senator Patrick Leahy's D.C. Office: (202) 224-4242

Contact Senator Rand Paul's D.C. Office: (202) 224-4343

Contact Senator Jeff Merkley's D.C. Office: (202) 224-3753

Sign up for our newsletter to receive breaking news directly in your inbox.

Originally posted here:
Senate Moves Forward With Bipartisan Bill to Rein in Jeff Sessions - RollingStone.com

Rand Paul Introduces Bill to Overturn Sessions’ Mandatory Minimum Memorandum – The Libertarian Republic

LISTEN TO TLRS LATEST PODCAST:

By Dries Van Thielen

Over the last couple of days, The Libertarian Republic has reported relentlessly on the many voices who have criticized Attorney General Jeff Sessions memorandum to pursue more mandatory minimums for (low-level) drug offenders. Senator Rand Paul, speaking about the memo,stated that the new drug policy will target minorities disproportionately. Columbia professorCarl Hart bluntly called AG Sessions a racist. And finally, Willie Nelsonextended an olive branch out to Sessions, and invited him to smoke weed.

These criticisms seem to have worked as three US Senators have reintroduced the Justice Safety Valve Act,which will neutralize the Sessions Doctrine. According to its initiators, Senators Rand Paul (R-KY), Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Jeff Merkley (D-OR), this legislation will give federal judges more flexibility when it comes to sentencing low-level criminals.

The language in which the bill is written clearly indicates that it is a reaction against Sessions dictatorial tendencies: The court may impose a sentence below a statutory minimum if the court finds that it is necessary to do so in order to avoid violating the requirements of sub-section (a).

Leahy, a former prosecutor himself, could not understand Sessions move. He told Rolling Stone: The idea that, weve got to stiffen the penalties and crime will stop, weve found it doesnt work. This is extraordinarily expensive Then, theres less money to go to violent, serious crime.

At the same time, RepresentativesBobby Scott (D-VA) andThomas Massie (R-KY) are reintroducing companion legislation in the U.S. House of Representatives.

In a press releaseRep. Scott stated: Attorney General Sessions directive to all federal prosecutors to charge the most serious offenses, including mandatory minimums, ignores the fact that mandatory minimum sentences have been studied extensively and have been found to distort rational sentencing systems, discriminate against minorities, waste money, and often require a judge to impose sentences that violate common sense. To add insult to injury, studies have shown that mandatory minimum sentences fail to reduce crime. Our bill will give discretion back to federal judges, so that they can consider all the facts, issues, and circumstances before sentencing.

Paul urges his colleagues in the Senate to vote in favor of this necessary piece of bipartisan legislation. Even if it passes the Senate and the House, the president will have the last say. However, Paul is positive when it comes to Trump. In an interview with Reason, he said: We could get the President to sign it.

We will keep our fingers crossed.

In the meantime, former mandatory minimum victim Weldon Angeloshas launched a petition you can sign here. Authorities arrested Angelos for selling small amounts of marijuana to an informant supposedly while armed. He was sentenced to 55 years (of which he served 13). Hes only released from jail because bipartisan advocates and his own prosecutor agreed to drop the charges. He urges Sessions to no longer uphold harsh mandatory minimum sentences for low-level drug offenders.

(READ MORE: AG Sessions Urges More Mandatory Minimums, Rand Paul Slams Back)

(READ MORE: Rand Paul: Sessionss New Drug Policy is Injustice to Minorities)

(READ MORE: Carl Hart: Jeff Sessions is a Racist)

(READ MORE: Willie Nelson Wants Sessions to Try Weed Before He Knocks It!)

BipartisanJeff Sessionsmandatory minimumsrand paulUS Senate

Here is the original post:
Rand Paul Introduces Bill to Overturn Sessions' Mandatory Minimum Memorandum - The Libertarian Republic