Archive for the ‘Progressives’ Category

"Pie and Politics" event hosted by East Side Progressives on July 13 – WKOW

MADISON (WKOW) -- The East Side Progressives are hosting a meet-and-greet social event with the candidates for the Dane County executive position on July 13.

"Pie and Politics" will take place from 3 to 5 p.m. at Elvehjem Park, 1202 Painted Post Road. Participants will be served pie and ice cream and have a chance to meet the candidates for the position with Dane County.

"We wanted to host this event because voter education and engagement is a core mission of our neighborhood action team. The presidential race has overshadowed this important race for leadership of Wisconsin's fastest growing county,"Chair of the East Side Progressive Arden Rice said.

The four candidates are State Sen. Melissa Agard, County Board Supervisor Dana Pellebon, Dane County Director of The Tamara Grigsby Office for Equity and Inclusion, Wesley Sparks, and Alder Regina Vidaver.

Each candidate will have 5-10 minutes to speak, followed by questions from the crowd.

"Many of the day-to-day issues that concern residents of Dane County, such as safety, transportation, and conservation of lakes, waterways, andgreen spaces, are local issues that are governed wholly or in part by county government. Through this event we hope to raise the visibility of this important race and remind voters to turn out for the August 13th primary," Rice added.

East Side Progressives strives to be a radically, ethnically, and economically diverse community of people committed to social justice. The three pillars to their work in the community are engagement, outreach and sustainability.

Do you have a breaking news tip to share with 27 News? Email us at news@wkow.com.

Read the original post:
"Pie and Politics" event hosted by East Side Progressives on July 13 - WKOW

New York Times columnist turns on progressives – UnHerd

New York Times columnist turns on progressives

Progressives have destroyed Americas west coast, according to a new article by NYT columnist Nicholas Kristof, who himself was a progressive until very recently.

Within a few years of moving from New York to his native Oregon, Kristof announced he was no longer a progressive. Seeing the challenges in Portland, Seattle, San Francisco, Los Angeles, have made me more wary of progressivism, he told Time in May. He also recently called for more restrictive immigration policies.

The crime and homelessness problems of west coast cities made him reassess his politics and hes far from the first. Progressive shibboleths, particularly lax drug enforcement and generous benefits for the homeless, has a way of turning even the most devout Leftists toward the political centre and Right. You can only free-ride on your regions good weather for so long.

As Nigel Farage launched Reform UKs contract not a manifesto, he maintains today in South Wales, the would-be Reform-voting Right-wing youth were scouring the document for policies aimed at them.

It seems they liked the gist of it, but they want more. So, what are they demanding? Beyond a Reform Youth wing, the Reform Zoomers have asked that the party restore the Ukip promise to abolish tuition fees for STEM subjects, remove interest rates on tuition fees, and remove the Graduate route on student visas.

In addition, the youth want to smoke. Reform UK must repeal the smoking and vaping bans, and commit to no funding of any organisation which aims to curtail our speech and our ability to express our views. Let the kids have fun again!

Read more:
New York Times columnist turns on progressives - UnHerd

France inspires Greek progressives to join forces – EURACTIV

The collaboration among the left and socialists in France ahead of the snap parliamentary elections later this month has sparked a big debate in Athens, with voices calling for Greek progressives to join forces on the rise.

The progressive parties must meet the expectations of progressive citizens, who want to see against New Democracy [EPP] a credible power and a pole to win the next elections with strong chances, Nikos Pappas, a lawmaker of leftist main opposition Syriza party told Euractiv.

Centre-right New Democracy party won the EU elections but with heavy losses.

Particularly, the conservatives scored 27.7%, well below the 33% goal set by Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis and a big drop from the 41% he scored in the legislative elections in July 2023, losing almost 1.1 million votes.

The main opposition Syriza party (EU Left) ranked second with 14.9%, followed by socialist Pasok (S&D) with 13%.

Since then, several members from both opposition parties have spoken publicly about the need to collaborate to overthrow conservatives.

For Pappas, the developments in France sparked the debate.

The snap elections came as a surprise, and the political forces were forced to lock themselves in a room and come out with a political agreement on the program and with candidates in all regions, the leftist lawmaker said.

We look at it very carefully and in a very positive way, he noted, adding that Syriza and Pasok working together can create a major political event.

The time, though, is not an ally, according to him.

If New Democracy falls further in the polls in the next period, Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis may be tempted to hold elections, and he will catch us off guard [] there will be no excuse.

This week, progressive politicians are gathering at an international event organised in Athens by former Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras (Syriza) and Zoran Zaev of North Macedonia.

Among them is also former French President Franois Hollande.

Speaking at the conference, Giorgos Papandreou, former Prime Minister and head of the Socialist International for 16 years, stated:

All the democratic forces can work together for a progressive Europe, for a progressive Balkans, for a progressive Greece.

At the event, a survey was presented on Tuesday, showing that progressive voters want things to move forward.

Particularly, 69% of citizens consider that there should be a convergence of the centre-left parties towards a single form.

Moreover, 83% of Syriza and Pasok voters responded positively to the question of whether there should be convergence into a single form.

Pasok, a member of the EU socialists in Greece, is currently in turmoil.

Its leader, Nikos Androulakis, is being questioned by several politicians within his party, pressuring him to hold internal elections.

All potential candidates, including Athens mayor Charis Doukas, have indicated that a dialogue in the centre-left should start.

Doukas (Pasok) won the municipal elections in Athens in October 2023 in the second round with the support of leftist Syriza.

Read more: Greek progressives deal ruling New Democracy severe blow in local elections

(Sarantis Michalopoulos | Euractiv.com, edited by Alice Taylor)

Read more here:
France inspires Greek progressives to join forces - EURACTIV

Fetterman, Torres, Jones Chose to Leave Progressives – New York Magazine

Photo-Illustration: Intelligencer; Photos: Getty Images

I didnt leave the progressive movement; the progressive movement left me, Representative Ritchie Torres of the Bronx recently told City & State New York. He was referring to the conflict within the left over Israel. Describing himself as a Zionist for the past decade, about half of his posts, retweets or interactions since October 7 have been supportive of Israel, City & State reported.

Torres is not a hypocrite. If we take him at his word, hes been a Zionist for a long time. But hes not being entirely truthful about the progressive movement or his place within it either. The movement didnt leave him: He left it, if indeed he was ever fully part of it, by making a series of deliberate choices. One such choice is to support Israel despite the unbelievable brutality it has inflicted on Palestinians in Gaza.

Support for Israel isnt the only reason Torres might find himself outside the progressive movement. During his time on the City Council, Torres angered progressive supporters by agreeing to water down the Right to Know Act, which would have forced officers to provide a business card in every encounter with the public, City & State reported. In 2017, ahead of the vote, he said, I stand by what I have chosen to do, even if it means standing alone even if it means I am no longer beloved in progressive circles. He carried that attitude with him to Congress, where he discovered allies within the Democratic Party, such as Senator John Fetterman. The Pennsylvania senator also holds a stringent pro-Israel position and told comedian Bill Maher this month that progressivism left him after October 7. I didnt leave the label, it left me on that, he said.

Mondaire Jones, whos running to return to Congress, struck a similar note in an interview with Politico. After he endorsed the AIPAC-backed George Latimer over progressive incumbent Jamaal Bowman, he came under significant fire from the left. The political arm of the Congressional Progressive Caucus even rescinded its endorsement of him. These people were never my actual friends, he claimed, saying that he would do nothing differently if given the chance. The appreciation that people have in these actual communities in the Hudson Valley is what matters to me, he said. That as well as my own sense of morality compelled me to intervene, given how god-awful Mr. Bowmans conduct has been.

Torres, Fetterman, and Jones are free to say that the progressive movement has left them behind. Perhaps they think theyre even being honest. The term progressive can be vague, even meaningless. Various Democrats and their supporters interpret it in wildly divergent ways. Its possible, then, for Torres to think of himself as a progressive, though he was never as far left as some may have hoped. But that exercise is difficult to sustain now, as Israel carries out a genocidal campaign in Gaza. Torres and pro-Israel politicians like him have sided with power over the powerless.

In doing so, theyve cast themselves out of the progressive movement. The label didnt leave Fetterman; he merely discarded it. He was happy to call himself progressive in social-media posts, to court the left as a candidate, and to accept a Sanders endorsement during his successful run for lieutenant governor. Now, when it truly counts, Fetterman is likelier to taunt the left than he is to embrace it. The left must employ litmus tests if terms like progressive are going to mean anything at all, and Fetterman would fail. So too would Torres and Jones. If they feel uncomfortable with the progressive movement now, its likely a sign they never belonged in the first place. Their values were always in conflict with the left, and Gaza merely brought that reality into sharper focus.

Its convenient, though, for pro-Israel Democrats to shift blame onto the left. Doing so gives them a chance to present themselves as brave truth tellers: See Jones, speaking of his personal sense of morality. But the left is not as powerful as I want it to be, and no courage is necessary to attack it. Critics instead exaggerate its influence in order to score points. Its a cheap way to look principled. Jones must invent straw men trust fund socialists in Williamsburg, as he put it to Politico in order to sound somewhat reasonable, let alone courageous.

Courage is not in the eye of the beholder. It means something. (So should the word progressive.) Theres nothing brave about rejecting the left in a moment of great moral consequence. Nor is there anything particularly courageous about standing with Israel, a longtime U.S. ally, as it pummels Gaza into dust. Courage in politics looks more like Bowman, who faces a formidable challenge from AIPAC as he defends his seat in Congress. A recent poll showed Bowman trailing Latimer, who is running to his right, but Bowman has refused to compromise his beliefs. Theyve got money, weve got people, he posted on X.

The U.S. needs a viable left: a counterweight to politicians who turn their backs to ongoing mass murder. Without it, were doomed not to ambivalence but something worse, an embrace of brutality and vengeance and horror. Torres, Fetterman, and Jones have made their choices. Progressive may be a mostly toothless label, but if its still too much, the movement is better off without them in it.

A photo-illustration in a previous version of this story incorrectly included Antonio Delgado, not Ritchie Torres.

Sarah Jones covers politics and labor.

By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice and to receive email correspondence from us.

Here is the original post:
Fetterman, Torres, Jones Chose to Leave Progressives - New York Magazine

AOC and progressives can’t hide their role in stoking antisemitism – JNS.org – JNS.org

(June 14, 2024 / JNS)

If you were wondering whether Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) was just a publicity-hungry leftist provocateur or a serious politician determined to do everything to advance her career on the national stage, you now have your answer. In an act of political triangulation worthy of former President Bill Clinton, the founding member of the leftist congressional Squad popularly known as AOC managed to take a stand against antisemitism and earn the applause of the liberal Jewish establishment while being bashed by even more extreme Jew-haters.

That AOC did this after repeatedly employing rhetoric about Israels war against Hamas, including falsely accusing the Jewish state of genocide that has helped fuel the current surge in antisemitism throughout the United States, illustrates not just her hypocrisy and chutzpah but also that she is a savvy political player. For years, shes been an avid supporter of the stands of Squad colleagues Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) as their open antisemitism became a national disgrace, as well as an indication of how she and fellow progressives were taking over the Democratic Party.

Her ability to flip the narrative about her anti-Israel incitement and demonization of the Jewish state is a testament both to her political acumen and the willingness of some of the people whose job it is to fight antisemitism to stay in sync with their allies on the Democratic left wing. But its also a sign of her ability to take advantage of an opportunity to position herself closer to the mainstream, thanks to the intolerance of left-wing extremists.

Pushing Biden to betray Israel

Since the Oct. 7 massacres in southern Israel, AOC has been a reliable Israel-basher and a key part of the left-wing coalition that has been pushing President Joe Biden and his administration to betray the Jewish state and let Hamas win the war. But for some on the far left, that wasnt good enough. Videos of the congresswoman being harassed by extremists for supposedly not being sufficiently anti-Israel went viral and wound up getting more publicity than her positions and statements making it clear that she was firmly in the anti-Zionist camp, along with her pals Omar and Tlaib.

Such attacks were annoying, but they also served her purpose as she eyes a future in national politics. That might mean an attempt to challenge Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer, also of New York, when he runs for re-election in 2028 or even a longshot run for the presidency that year or in the future.

Having staked out ground as a fierce opponent of Israel and an inveterate basher of the AIPAC pro-Israel lobby in terms that are indistinguishable from traditional antisemitic tropes, AOC ought to be radioactive to mainstream Jewish groups. But even after the events of the last eight months as the anti-Israel progressives did all they could to help Hamas and to undermine support for the Jewish states right to self-defense, some of the people tasked with defending the Jews are still eager to help their erstwhile allies.

Providing cover for an extremist

A prime example of this is Amy Spitalnick, head of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, the umbrella of Jewish community-relations groups across the nation. As I predicted when she was chosen for her job last year, Spitalnick is, even after Oct. 7, still more interested in fighting for the progressive political agenda and partisan Democratic goals than defending Israel and the Jews. So, it was unsurprising that she joined AOC, along with Stacy Burdett, a former ADL official, on a livestream webinar broadcast on X titled Antisemitism and the Fight for Democracy.

The title was the tip-off that the purpose of the program was to promote the Democratic Partys main 2024 talking point rather than doing something about Jew-hatred. The point being that liberal groups like the JCPA agree that the only way to defend democracy is to keep the Democrats in power and regard the fact that it is the political left that is the main source of contemporary antisemitism as an inconvenient fact that may be an obstacle to achieving that objective.

So, Spitalnick and Burdett were happy to provide cover for AOC to try and wiggle the progressives out of their current dilemma where there is no longer any doubt about their being primarily responsible for an unprecedented surge in antisemitism. In order to do that, AOC had to be willing to do something that the leader of her partythe supposedly moderate pro-Israel President Joe Bidenhas not been willing to do: Denounce the antisemites in his own party. As I noted earlier this year, Biden has been unwilling to have a Sister Souljah moment with the antisemitic wing of his party and has instead been kowtowing to the Democrats far-left and Arab-American elements as he sought to shore up support for his re-election effort among his partys base.

Sensing an opportunity to position herself closer to the political mainstream without actually having to moderate her positions, AOC pounced. During the course of the webinar, she made a statement that made her appear as if she is an opponent of antisemitism while not budging an inch in her anti-Zionism and willingness to smear Israel as a monstrous country guilty of genocide against innocent Palestinians.

Antisemitism, hate and violence against Jews because of their identity is real, and it is dangerous, said Ocasio-Cortez, earning herself praise not just from her accomplices Spitalnick and Burdett, but even from a pro-Israel stalwart like Abe Foxman, the former head of the Anti-Defamation League in the days when it prioritized the fight against antisemitism rather than the cause of the Democratic Party, as is the case with his successor, CEO and national director Jonathan Greenblatt.

Indeed, Foxman wasnt the only one duped by AOC into lauding her stand because of the belief that even the most minimal acknowledgment that antisemitism exists on the left seemed a breakthrough.

However, her point was that antisemitism undermined the progressive agenda. Antisemitism is an assault on our values as Americans and especially as progressives, she said. Antisemitism is also a threat to a community that is a vital partner in our struggles against injustice. So, when the Jewish community is threatened, the progressive movement is undermined. That is why we reject it as fiercely as we reject and look for misogyny, Islamophobia or any form of bigotry or discrimination in any space that we occupy. Right now, antisemitism is on the rise in America and across the world. Acknowledging that fact does not take away from fights for liberation, it actually advances them.

Still opposing Zionism

The congresswoman made clear that she was merely distancing herself from the more vulgar forms of Jew-hatred, like the rampage of pro-Palestinian demonstrators outside the White House, anti-Israel mobs protesting in front of a Wall Street exhibit about the Oct. 7 murders at the Nova music festival, the targeting of Jews during a day of rage on the New York City subway and the red-paint vandalization of the homes of officials associated with the Brooklyn Museum.

In essence, what she was trying to do was to separate herself from the thugs on the streets while still opposing the existence of the one Jewish state on the planet. She also essentially backs efforts to ensure that the genocidal and fascist terrorists of Hamas are allowed to escape accountability for atrocities on Oct. 7, and go back to governing Gaza and working towards their goal of destroying Israel.

It is also important to say here in this moment and during that conversation that criticism of the Israeli government is not inherently antisemitic and criticism of Zionism is not automatically antisemitic, AOC added.

Of course, criticism of any Israeli government is not antisemitic. But criticism of Zionism is indistinguishable from an effort to deny Jews rights that no one would think of denying to anyone else. This statement gave herand by implication, other progressivesa pass for engaging in the worst kind of libels against Israel and demonizing its efforts to defend itself against those who see Oct. 7 as just a trailer for what they wish to do to the rest of Israel.

No responsible Jewish leader should be providing cover for a member of Congress who has done so much to advance the anti-Israel cause. But more important is the need for those who pretend to lead the Jewish community to understand that the ideological basis for the open antisemitism in the streets of Americas cities and on college campuses is to be found in the beliefs about critical race theory and intersectionality that an avowed Marxist like AOC calls fights for liberation. A condemnation of antisemitism that doesnt acknowledge that the extremism and violence against Jews so ubiquitous right now can be directly linked to the promotion of these ideas is useless.

As has been abundantly clear for years but can no longer be ignored since Oct. 7, the mindset that sees the world divided into two groups of white oppressors and people of color who are their victims, locked in a perpetual race war, inevitably falsely labels Israel and Jews as the former. The fact that the JCPA and ADL have refused to renounce their endorsement of these toxic woke progressive agenda items, even as they acknowledged the spike in antisemitism from their former allies on the left, shows just how morally bankrupt these organizations and leaders like Spitalnick and Greenblatt have become.

The future of the Democrats?

There should be no pass given to politicians, academics or anyone who pretends to oppose antisemitism while still opposing Israels existence and right to exist. And none for those, like AOC, whose main goal since Oct. 7 has been to prevent the elimination of Hamas. Those progressives who dont want to dirty their hands in the way the masked thugs do arent opposing antisemitism. The mobs in the streets may have gone farther than the congresswoman and other progressives are comfortable with in expressing their hatred for Israel and the Jews. Still, their end goals are no different from hers and anyone else who is working for victory for Hamas. Her advocacy advances their cause, whether or not she or they are willing to admit it.

Those who see AOC as the future of the Democratic Party probably arent wrong. Most Democrats arent in agreement with her extreme positions on foreign policy, or even the environment and green new deal measures that would impoverish the nation and harm middle- and working-class Americans while elites like AOC remain untouched. But the progressives dominate the younger generation of Democratic activists and the party base.

That she is disassociating herself from the worst excesses of her allies while still engaging in antisemitic tropes about AIPAC and Zionism is no reason for Jews who purport to speak for American Jewry to back her deception. Indeed, it says more about the collapse of Jewish leadership at a time when its needed most. Either way, AOCs determination to act in a matter that will allow her to advance her toxic causes and personal ambitions is a warning for those who care about not just Israel and the Jews, but the future of America. The more influential a Marxist extremist like her grows, the more dangerous a place this country will be not just for Jews but for the cause of liberty itself.

Jonathan S. Tobin is editor-in-chief of JNS (Jewish News Syndicate). Follow him @jonathans_tobin.

Subscribe to The JNS Daily Syndicate by email and never miss our top stories

By signing up, you agree to receive emails from JNS and allied pro-Israel organizations.

You have read 3 articles this month.

Register to receive full access to JNS.

More:
AOC and progressives can't hide their role in stoking antisemitism - JNS.org - JNS.org