Archive for the ‘Obama’ Category

As Obama Clean Power Plan Fades, States Craft Strategies To Move Beyond It – NPR

Rick Moore, a dairy farmer in Canton, N.Y., has a solar thermal array to heat water he uses to spray down milking equipment. David Sommerstein/North Country Public Radio hide caption

Rick Moore, a dairy farmer in Canton, N.Y., has a solar thermal array to heat water he uses to spray down milking equipment.

There have been no executive orders yet to undo President Barack Obama's signature climate plan, but many officials and environmental groups consider it as good as dead. The Clean Power Plan is on hold while a legal battle plays out, and even if an appeals court upholds it a decision could come any day the Trump administration is likely to appeal to the Supreme Court.

The state of New York decided to forge ahead anyway. Like a number of other mostly liberal states, it is continuing with efforts to drive down the carbon emissions that drive climate change.

In the upstate village of Canton, dairy farmer Rick Moore shows off the solar thermal array tucked next to his slouching red barn. It's a cloudy, slushy day, but "you still get rays that still help heat it up," Moore says.

The system warms the water that runs through the solar tubes. Moore then uses the water to spray down his milking equipment. He says it will save him $1,000 a year, and help reduce the carbon emissions he says are changing the climate here.

"We had winters when I first started, that you had three feet of snow and cold for two weeks at a time," he says. "You're not seeing that nowadays."

New York state paid for nearly the entire system. It sees Moore as a tiny piece of a puzzle that adds up to getting half of the state's power from renewables by 2030, even without a federal mandate.

The Clean Power Plan would have required energy plants to cut their carbon emissions, leaving it up to each state to figure out how to reach a specific reduction target. The plan was supposed to be the main way the U.S. carried out its commitment under the historic Paris climate deal. But after it was announced in 2015, about two dozen mostly conservative states sued the Obama administration to block it.

Still, New York has not only stuck with its own plan to reduce carbon pollution, it's now doubling down on its goal.

"We are not going to stop until we reach 100 percent renewable because that's what a sustainable New York is really all about," Gov. Andrew Cuomo said earlier this month.

New York is pouring billions into everything from solar to smart power grids, electric car charging stations to huge offshore wind farms. In fact, Cuomo just announced the nation's largest offshore wind project. The state already gets almost 25 percent of its power from renewables, mostly from hydropower dams. Critics say the next 25 percent is the big lift.

Cheap natural gas has driven down power prices. So much, says Gavin Donohue of the Independent Power Producers of New York, that existing renewables, like wind, hydro and biomass, need more state help to stay in business.

"What's guiding all of our policy development here in New York is not cost, not efficiencies, not reliability, but what gets us to some magical CO2 number to show that we're a national leader," he says.

Another complication could be Cuomo's recent announcement to shut down the Indian Point nuclear plant, near New York City. But the state says it plans to replace that with another kind of carbon-free power, including more wind farms. It also plans to add transmission lines to carry hydropower from Quebec.

North Dakota looks to clean up coal

North Dakota led the legal challenge against Obama's Clean Power Plan, and many there were happy to see it put on hold. The state gets three-quarters of its electricity from thousands of tons of lignite coal, among the most polluting sources of energy. For that reason, the climate plan would have required bigger emissions cuts than almost any other state, some 45 percent.

"North Dakota had to be two-thirds of that way by 2022," says Randy Christmann with the North Dakota Public Service Commission. "That's only a few years away and there's no way we were getting there."

The state would likely have had to add hundreds of wind turbines and shut down coal mines and plants.

Jason Bohrer, with North Dakota's lignite coal trade group, says it's great the Clean Power Plan is likely gone with the new administration. But "Donald Trump is not the cure-all for the coal industry," he says. "This doesn't fix everything. It just gives us the opportunity to provide solutions."

A dragline at the Center Mine in North Dakota removes dirt to expose layers of lignite coal. The coal is mined and transported to a power plant just a few miles away, where it's burned to generate electricity. Amy Sisk/Inside Energy hide caption

A dragline at the Center Mine in North Dakota removes dirt to expose layers of lignite coal. The coal is mined and transported to a power plant just a few miles away, where it's burned to generate electricity.

Bohrer says public demand and market forces are fueling a boom in cleaner energy. Cheap wind power has grown into North Dakota's second-biggest electricity source. So even though the pressure's off to curb emissions, the state is looking to clean up coal as a way to save jobs.

The state and the coal industry have sunk millions into developing a coal plant that reuses the carbon dioxide it creates. The aim is zero emissions.

If it works, Dave Glatt with the state health department thinks this could bring the state close to that ambitious 45 percent reduction target.

"We may not hit it necessarily on the exact timelines that the Clean Power Plan was looking at," he says. "But I do think that that's something we should look at. Can we achieve that or even go beyond that?"

This year, North Dakota will craft its own energy plan, hoping coal and renewables can co-exist.

Paris Climate deal not enough

It's not clear if market forces can get the U.S. all the way to its goals under the Paris climate deal. They may take a long time to play out, and climate scientists say a large-scale shift to clean energy needs to happen urgently. Still, few energy experts can imagine building another U.S. coal plant. Operators must plan decades into the future, they say, and even if the Trump administration won't tackle carbon emissions, a future president likely will.

Obama's Clean Power Plan was also an easy lift for some, and many states are already close to meeting their goals.

But globally, the Paris climate deal is not nearly enough. The U.S. like other countries would have to do much more to keep carbon emissions below the point where scientists say they will have disastrous consequences.

So far, there's nothing to suggest the Trump administration plans to make that extra push.

David Sommerstein is a reporter for North Country Public Radio. Amy Sisk reports for Inside Energy, a public media collaboration focused on America's energy issues.

Link:
As Obama Clean Power Plan Fades, States Craft Strategies To Move Beyond It - NPR

Trump: Obama wrote me ‘a beautiful letter’ – The Hill

President Donald TrumpDonald TrumpTrump: Obama wrote me 'a beautiful letter' Trump: Receiving nuclear codes a 'very sobering moment' Mexican president rebuffs Trump on wall executive order MORE said that former President Barack ObamaBarack ObamaTrump: Obama wrote me 'a beautiful letter' Overnight Tech: Dems want answers on AT&T, Time Warner merger | Trump names FTC head | Facebook, Google take new steps against fake news Raul Castro: Trump should respect Cuba's sovereignty MORE left a beautiful letter that was so well written in the desk drawer in the Oval Office.

I doubt too many of them were written in this matter, Trump told ABC News in an interview, referencing the tradition of presidents writing letters to their successors.

In fact I called him and thanked him for the thought that was put into that letter.

Trump declined to let ABC News host David Muir read the letter, but Muir pointed out that the letter was longer than notes written by previous presidents.

It was long. It was complex. It was thoughtful. And it took time to do it, and I appreciated it and I called him and thanked him, Trump said.

While Trump said nothing in the letter surprised him he pointed to one section of Obamas letter that he thought was very interesting.

He said, You know if I thought your healthcare plan was going to be better than his plan, ObamaCare, I would support it. And I believe he would, said Trump.

Trump also noted that during the car ride from Capitol Hill to the White House with the Obamas, he pointed out to President Obama that the ride was "weird" after the vitriol of the presidential campaign, during which the Obamas campaigned hard for Hillary ClintonHillary Rodham ClintonTrump: Obama wrote me 'a beautiful letter' Trump says he hopes America has seen the end of Clinton probes Chaffetz on voter fraud: 'I dont see any evidence MORE.

"We didn't discuss the negative, we only discussed the future and the positive. And we really get along well. Now again, he may say differently, but I don't think he would," he said.

The rest is here:
Trump: Obama wrote me 'a beautiful letter' - The Hill

Gallup: Obama approval ratings most polarized in US history – The Hill

A Gallup poll releasedWednesdayshows that former President Obama's approval ratings are easily the most polarized in modern American history, with Democrats rating him highly and Republicans rating him poorly.

"Throughout his presidency, Barack ObamaBarack ObamaTrump: Obama wrote me 'a beautiful letter' Overnight Tech: Dems want answers on AT&T, Time Warner merger | Trump names FTC head | Facebook, Google take new steps against fake news Raul Castro: Trump should respect Cuba's sovereignty MORE averaged 83% job approval among Democrats and 13% among Republicans," reports Gallup. "That 70-percentage-point party gap in job approval ratings easily eclipses the prior high 61 points for George W. Bush.

"All other presidents had party gaps of 55 points or less."

ADVERTISEMENT

The huge party gap findings come on the heels of Gallup's November poll showing 77 percent of Americans perceiving the nation as divided, an all-time high.

The same poll showed 49 percent believing President Trump will do more to divide the country, while 45 percent view him as a uniter.

The rest is here:
Gallup: Obama approval ratings most polarized in US history - The Hill

Ex-Gang Member Who Had His Sentence Commuted by Obama ‘Executed’ in Mich. – The Root

A man who was recently released from prison after former President Barack Obama commuted his sentence was killed Monday night when two masked gunmen entered a federal halfway house in Saginaw, Mich., and shot him execution style, police say.

Demarlon C. Thomas, 31, was a former member of Saginaws Sunny Side Gang who had his 19-year prison sentence commuted by Obama in November, MLive reports. Michigan State Police Lt. David Kaiser told MLive that Thomas was killed by one of two gunmen around 9:40 p.m. Monday.

Kaiser said that one gunman controlled some of the other 23 people in the halfway house while the other shot Thomas numerous times, including in the head.

One person watched over a group of them while another subject located the victim and executed him, Kaiser said. They were looking for this person.

Kaiser said that no one else was injured in the incident, and it is unknown at this time what security measures the halfway house had in place. There are no suspects in custody.

Thomas was one of 79 people across the country who had their sentences commuted on Nov. 22, 2016. Obama commuted his sentence to expire on March 22, 2017, eight years before his initial release date.

Thomas had been serving time at Elkton Federal Correctional Institution in Lisbon, Ohio. It is unknown how long he had been out of prison and living at the halfway house.

According to MLive, Thomas was arrested in one of the biggest drug busts in the history of Saginaw, and in 2008 he was sentenced to 19 years in prison for the distribution of 5 grams or more of cocaine.

In all, the three-year federal investigation called Operation Sunset saw 29 convictions in federal court, including Thomas, and 10 in state court. MLive reports that it effectively brought about the end of the Sunny Side Gang, which operated on Saginaws South Side.

The investigation into the execution of Thomas is being handled by the Michigan State Police Major Crimes Unit.

Read more at MLive.

Read the original here:
Ex-Gang Member Who Had His Sentence Commuted by Obama 'Executed' in Mich. - The Root

An Obama Insider’s Lament – National Review

Conservatives will have a hard time finding a more like-minded guide to the decision-making inside the Obama White House than Michael Wear.

Wear served in the White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships during Obamas first term, and then directed faith outreach for the presidents reelection campaign. His memoir of his time in the administration, Reclaiming Hope, is a spectacularly readable portrait of a unique niche in Obama-world to which many progressives grew hostile over time, representing as it did faith in general and Christianity in particular.

At a meeting early in Obamas first term, Wear recalls, he was introducing himself to some other young staffers and explaining his job when the second-most senior staffer at the table interrupted me and began a rant about the separation of church and state and what he deemed to be the impropriety of [faith-based outreach].

By his own account, Wear was nave at the beginning of the Obama years, a 21-year-old out to change the world before the world changed him, too inexperienced to know what was impossible and therefore willing to reach for what no one had done before. He is as admirably frank as Democrats get these days in acknowledging the virtues of faithful Americans, and he doesnt shy away from or gloss over the Obama administrations problems and clashes with Christian groups, dissecting each one as an insider who remains deeply sympathetic to Obama but who cant deny what he saw all around him.

In describing the battle that erupted between the administration and the Little Sisters of the Poor over Obamacares contraception mandate, Wear casts himself as Cassandra. This was not a standard disagreement between religious conservatives and a progressive White House, but instead a potentially landscape-shifting conflict-stoking move. This reality was conveyed to the highest levels of the White House repeatedly. He claims that the administration chose the path of most resistance in the contraception fight as a deliberate, cynical political strategy: A senior political advisor repeatedly thought that the bishops complaints would bolster a useful campaign narrative: that supporters of their view, including Republican Mitt Romney, held anachronistic views about women and family planning.

On gay marriage, Wear warily recounts Obamas declaration to Pastor Rick Warren at Saddleback Church that I believe that marriage is the union between a man and a woman and his May 2012 announcement that he suddenly realized that opposing gay marriage was incompatible with the Golden Rule to treat others as one wishes to be treated. Wear reminds readers that the presidents language was poll-tested and promoted by LGBT groups as effective. He also notes that many [campaign staffers] now acted as though he had never opposed same-sex marriage in the first place.

For cynics, its easy to conclude that President Obama is a liar, or that all of his statements come with an expiration date. But for Wear, a true believer, the conveniently timed, unpersuasively explained change of heart challenges the public persona Obama constructed during the 2008 campaign.

I was forced to ask myself, would he really have used religious language to convince voters of something he did not believe? Wear writes. If the president did believe in and support same-sex marriage in 2007 or even earlier, his repeated assertions that he did not were a direct rebuke to the type of politics he said was possible. To let stand the claim that he supported gay marriage all along is to choose political gain over the integrity of the presidents own words.

Rarely will you hear a participant in a winning presidential campaign describe the victorious effort so scathingly. Wear cringes at Democratic National Convention speakers almost comically excited about abortion. The cynicism of the endeavor grates on him. Data-driven politics is incompatible with an aspirational politics. It is willing to sacrifice a broader coalition for a few bucks, a dozen hours of free airtime and an angrier base. Hes clearly uncomfortable with the effort to paint Republican opponents into extreme, theocratic monsters: Too often the White House would not seek to marginalize the most offensive voices but to prop them up....One former aide to Obama summarized the 2012 campaigns basic message to voters was that Mitt Romney hates you.

Wear concludes by contrasting the 2009 inaugural where Obama stood by the decision to have Rick Warren deliver the invocation with the 2013 inaugural, where controversy erupted surrounding Louie Giglio.

Giglio is the pastor of Passion City Church, a particularly outspoken activist against human trafficking, and, in Wears words, the type of evangelical leader Democrats had pined for just years ago when they were on the defensive on social issues. He was no stranger to Obama; he was one of four Evangelical leaders invited to the White House to meet with the president after Obama announced the administrations support for gay marriage. But after he was announced as a speaker at the 2013 inauguration, liberal and gay-rights groups threw a fit.

Wear describes increasingly tense negotiations that climax when a senior staffer at one of our countrys leading LGBT rights groups is asked what kind of religious leader would be deemed acceptable to replace Giglio. The reply was, Honestly, if it is a Christian, we will find something on him, and make him famous. Giglio withdrew.

Wears conclusion is succinct and disturbing: In 2009, our diversity demanded we accept that there will be voices we disagree with in public spaces. In 2013, diversity required us to expel all dissent.

You might expect a book with tales like this to be angrier. Throughout, its clear Wear loves Obama both as a Christian and as a political leader. The story amounts to an affectionate, forgiving look at a leaders increasingly consistent betrayals. Your perspective on Christianity may determine whether you walk away from Reclaiming Hope thinking of Wear as a merciful soul or as a man who got suckered and is rationalizing his past loyalty.

Undoubtedly, a part of Obamas conscience wanted a more civil, respectful tone in politics, a Democratic party in which the Christian faithful felt warmly welcomed and celebrated instead of vilified, and a nation where religious liberty was broadly respected and persons of faith would feel like they were being demonized for political purposes.

Throughout his presidency, Obama wrestled with that conscience, and he always found a way to beat it.

Jim Geraghty is National Reviews senior political correspondent.

Go here to read the rest:
An Obama Insider's Lament - National Review