Archive for the ‘Obama’ Category

Susan Rice, Obama colleagues take heat for past claims on …

Susan Rice and other former Obama administration officials are taking heat for past claims that their 2013 Syria agreement successfully led to the Assad regime purging its entire chemical weapons stockpile -- in the wake of this week's alleged sarin gas attack.

On Thursday, President Trump launched a targeted strike at a Syrian airfield in response to what he called a barbaric chemical attack on innocent civilians at the hand of Syrian President Bashar Assad.

There can be no dispute that Syria used banned chemical weapons, violated its obligations under the Chemical Weapons Convention and ignored the urging of the U.N. Security Council, Trump said.

Video footage from the chemical attack scene immediately raised credibility problems for claims made by members of the Obama administration that the prior agreement had rid the war-torn country of chemical agents.

During an interview this past January with National Public Radio, former National Security Adviser Rice touted the success in Syria, in striking a deal with Russia's help that resulted in the prior administration dropping the threat of military action.

We were able to find a solution that didnt necessitate the use of force that actually removed the chemical weapons that were known from Syria, in a way that the use of force would never have accomplished, she boasted. We were able to get the Syrian government to voluntarily and verifiably give up its chemical weapons stockpile.

Rice has come under fire for making misleading comments in the past. Most recently, she grabbed headlines for allegedly being tied to allegations of improper surveillance of the Trump team prior to his inauguration.

Rice isnt the only Obama-era official who made self-congratulatory statements about removing chemical weapons from Syria.

In July 2014, then-Secretary of State John Kerry went on NBCs Meet the Press to discuss the September 2013 deal that resulted in Russia agreeing to help confiscate and then destroy Syrias stockpile.

We struck a deal where we got 100 percent of the chemical weapons out, Kerry claimed.

At the time, the fact-checking website PolitiFact found Kerrys comments to be mostly true. However, given new evidence that Assad had recently used chemical weapons against his own people, PolitiFact was forced to revisit and revise its assessment of Kerrys claims.

We dont know key details about the reported chemical attack in Syria on April 4, 2017, but it raises two clear possibilities: Either Syria never fulling complied with its 2013 promise to reveal all of its chemical weapons; or it did, but then converted otherwise non-lethal chemicals to military uses.

One way or another, subsequent events have proved Kerry wrong, the site ruled.

In August 2016, a U.N. report revealed that Assad had used chlorine gas against civilians on two separate occasions since the 2013 deal a clear violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention. Despite that report, members of the Obama administration continued to claim they had been successful in disarming Assads chemical weapons arsenal.

They routinely touted the diplomatic nature of the joint U.S.-and-Russia brokered deal.

Obama issued his infamous red line warning to Syrias leader in 2012 not to use chemical weapons. In 2013, when reports surfaced that Assad used sarin gas to kill his people, the deal to remove chemical weapons was intended to avert military action.

The president himself on Aug. 18. 2014 said that the most lethal declared chemical weapons possessed by the Syrian regime were destroyed by dedicated U.S. civilian and military professionals and that it had been done several weeks ahead of schedule.

On Jan. 6, 2015, then-White House Press Secretary John Earnest praised Russia for its role in destroying the chemical weapons stockpile of the Assad regime.

That was an important step, because it reduced, or essentially eliminated, the proliferation risk from that declared chemical weapons stockpile, that we could essentially destroy those chemical weapons and ensure that terrorists would not be able to get their hands on them and use them in other places.

Five months later on June 17, 2015, Earnest said that the declared chemical weapons stockpile that Assad previously denied existed has now been acknowledged, rounded up, removed from the country and destroyed precisely because of the work of this administration and our successful efforts to work with the Russians to accomplish that goal.

On Thursday night, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson slammed Russia for failing to do its part in preventing the Syrian government from using chemical weapons, despite the 2013 agreement to remove weapons from the country.

Either Russia has been complicit or Russia has been simply incompetent, Tillerson said.

View post:
Susan Rice, Obama colleagues take heat for past claims on ...

Updated presidential golf tracker: Obama 333, Trump 13(?) – Palm Beach Post (blog)

President Donald Trump trails former President Barack Obama by more than 300 rounds of presidential golf, but Trump has been teeing off at a faster pace than his predecessor. (Trump photo by Allen Eyestone/The Palm Beach Post; Obama photo by Chris Carlson/AP)

President Donald Trump departed Mar-a-Lago this morning for his nearby Trump International Golf Club in unincorporated West Palm Beach.

Hes wearing a polo shirt and red hat according to a press pool report the garb he usually wears for golf.

If he is in fact playing golf, The Palm Beach Post estimates itll be his 13thgolf outing as president a rate of once for every 6.1 days hes been in office. All Trumps golf outings have come on Saturdays or Sundays and all have been on Trump-branded courses.

Former President Barack Obama golfed 333 times as president, according to Mark Knoller of CBS News. Thats a rate of once every8.8 days he was in office.

Trumps time on the golf course has become a touchy topic for the White Housebecause Trump was a frequent critic ofObamas golf habit.

The White House is usually reluctant to confirm whether Trump is playing golf and notes that he often takes calls and holds meetings while hes visiting his golf courses.

Heres a rundown of previous times when evidence strongly suggests President Trump was playing golf:

Trump in golf attire after more than four hours at Trump International Golf Club on Feb. 4.

Feb. 4 Arrived at Trump International Golf Club at 9:33 a.m., left at 2:05 p.m. wearing golf hat and golf shirt.

Feb. 5 Arrived at Trump International at 9:27 a.m., left at 2 p.m. wearing golf hat and golf shirt. According to a pool report that day, the White House shares that while at the Trump International Golf Club, he has had meetings and may play a few holes of golf.

President Donald Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe exchange a high five at Trump National Golf Club on Feb. 11.

Feb. 11 Arrived at Trump National Golf Club in Jupiter at 9:26 a.m. with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Also joined on the course by two-time U.S. Open champion Ernie Els. Trump and Abe left the club after playing 18 holes at about 1:30 p.m.

Trump and Abe then visited Trump International and, according to a New York Times report, played another nine holes.

Feb. 12 Arrived at Trump International at 8:31 a.m., left at 1:49 p.m., appeared to be wearing a golf shirt in the limo ride back to Mar-a-Lago.

Feb. 18 Arrived at Trump International at 8:51 a.m., left at 1:16 p.m. Asked the next day if Trump played golf during the 4-hour visit to the golf club, White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders said: I do believe he played a couple of holes.

Trump, Rory McIlroy, former baseball star Paul ONeill and Clear Sports CEO Garry Singer on the links Feb. 19.

Feb. 19 Arrived at Trump International at 8:58 a.m., left at 2:25 p.m. Spokeswoman Sanders: I know he played a couple of holes this morning, but Im not going to disclose any of the others that were there. Golf blog NoLayingUp.com later revealed Trump played 18 holes with four-time major champion Rory McIlroy.

After the McIlroy news, Sanders said the president intended to play a few holes and decided to play longer. He also had a full day of meetings, calls and interviews for the new NSA (national security adviser)

March 4 After unleashing a series of early morning tweets accusing Obama of wiretapping him, the president arrived at Trump International at 9:26 a.m. andleft at 1:05 p.m. wearing a Make America Great Again hat and golf shirt. The White House said the president was conducting meetings, taking phone calls and that he might hit a few balls.

Golf glove on President Donald Trumps left hand suggests he had more than meetings and phone calls at his golf course on March 18.

March 5 Arrived at Trump International at 9:02 a.m. and departed at 12:48 a.m. The White House didnt confirm whether the president played golf during his nearly four hours at the course.

March 18 Arrived at Trump International around 10 a.m. and left at 2:44 p.m. The White HousesaidTrumphad meetings and phone calls at the club and wouldnt say whether he was golfing. Trump friend Christopher Ruddy later tweeted a picture of the president in the clubhouse in golf attire, including a golfing glove on his left hand.

March 19 Arrived at Trump International at 8:37 a.m. and left at 12:10 p.m. Appeared to be wearing golf shirt and hat on limo ride back to Mar-a-Lago.

Social media pics suggest Trump golfed March 25 in Northern Virginia.

March 25 Arrived at 11:01 a.m. at Trump National Golf Club in Sterling, Va. Departed at 3:20 p.m. Pictures on social media showed the president in golf shirt, hat and shoes.

April 2 At Trump National Golf Club in Sterling, Va., a rare White House-confirmed golf outing with Sen. Rand Paul and Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney. Theyre discussing a variety of topics, including healthcare, said White House spokeswoman Stephanie Grisham.

Today Trump visits his Trump International Golf Club in polo shirt and red hat. Stay tuned for details

Like Loading...

Previous

Chinese review of Ivanka Trumps kids singing: Touchingheart-warming

Continued here:
Updated presidential golf tracker: Obama 333, Trump 13(?) - Palm Beach Post (blog)

Trump Blows Up Obama’s Foreign Policy Straw Men – National Review

President Trump did more than retaliate for Bashar al-Assads illegal and inhumane use of nerve agents against civilians when he ordered the launch of 59 Tomahawkmissiles to destroy al-Shayrat airbase in Syria. He also detonated a few shibboleths of his predecessors foreign policy.

First isthe idea thatPresident Obamas 2013 deal to remove Assads weapons of mass destruction was a success. Susan Rice and John Kerry have lauded the agreement with Russia to supervise the extraction and destruction of Assads weapons stockpiles as recently as the last year. But Assads brazen attack on civilians in Idlib Province exposed their celebrations as premature. Trumps swift, decisive, and limited response ended more than a half decade of vacillation towards Assads behavior. Obama diplomacy failed, but hard power may yet deter Assad from using weapons banned for almost a century.

The second casualty of the U.S. strike was the absurd Obama line that the only alternatives available to a president are inaction on one hand and a massive ground invasion and occupation on the other. Obama and the architects of his echo chamber would slam any advocate of military measures as a bloodthirsty warmonger ready to repeat the worst mistakes of the U.S. experience in Iraq and Afghanistan. But the reality has always been that there are a range of intermediary steps America can take to pursue her objectives and enforcethe standards of Western civilization. The destruction of al-Shayrat is an example of coercive diplomacy similar to the airstrikes President Reagan deployed against Muammar Qaddafi and President Clinton deployed against Slobodan Milosevic. The immediate aim is punitive, to deterthe further use of nerve gas against civilians. The longer-term goal is to remove Assad from power and reach a settlement that would in all likelihood partition Syria into sectarian zones of influence. Both objectives are impossible through diplomacy alone. Only through the introduction of force might we frighten the Syrians and their supporters into giving up Assad if not the Alawite power structure and winding down his war machine.

EDITORIAL: Syria After the Airstrikes

Which brings us to the final straw man Trump lit on fire. When President Obama punted on Syria in 2013, he claimed there was no international support for limited intervention. True, David Cameron lost a vote in Parliament on the matter. But the actual powers Obama didnt want to offend were Iran and Russia.He worried they would scuttle the Iran nuclear dealas payback. The loss of American credibility, the confidence ofallies, and Syrian civilians were all factored into the cost of an Iranian promise not to test a bomb for 10 years.

Well, the rapprochement with Iran, if it ever existed, is over. In recent weeks President Trump has met with the leaders of our traditional Sunni allies: Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Jordan. He has signed off on aid to Saudi in its war against Iranian proxies in Yemen. He has approved weapons to Bahrain, which is worried about Iranian influence over its Shiite population. America is heavily involved in Iraq and Syria. And now, by striking Assad, President Trump has targetedIrans most prominentservant.

Where things go from here is anyones guess. One of the reasons I urged Congress not to support Obamas airstrikes in 2013 was worry not only over the presidents ambivalence but also possible escalation. Presidential ambivalence is gone, but myworry remains. I do think that this operation was about the best one could hope for: the message and objective was clear, the focus limited, the forceoverwhelming, support broad and deep. Assad may think twice before using these deadly agents again. Russia may be more inclined to replace him with one of his generals. But it is still worth thinking through possible responses if Assad crosses one of President Trumps many lines again. Whatever the future holds, we do know this: President Trumps foreign policy will look nothing like President Obamas.

Matthew Continetti is the editor-in-chief of the Washington Free Beacon, where this column first appeared. 2017All rights reserved

READ MORE:

Visit link:
Trump Blows Up Obama's Foreign Policy Straw Men - National Review

Obama Administration Knew Syria Still Had Chemical Weapons, Despite Saying Otherwise – The Weekly Standard

National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster delivered remarks in Florida today to give some background on the strikes against Syria Thursday. He made one curious comment that raises a lot of troubling questions:

And the one thing that I will tell you though, there was an effort to minimizeto minimize risk to third-country nationals at that airportI think you read Russians from thatbut thatand we took great pains to try to avoid that. Of course, in any kind of military operation, there are no guarantees. And then there were also measures put in place to avoid hitting what we believe is a storage of sarin gas, so that that would not be ignited and cause a hazard to civilians or anyone else.

Emphasis added. Now recall that John Kerry bragged on Charlie Rose in 2014 about the Obama administration cutting an historic deal that removed "100 percent of the declared chemical weapons" from Syria. I don't know how much of a caveat the word "declared" constitutes, but as recently as January former Obama National Security Adviser Susan Rice was confidently announcing that the Obama administration had removed chemical weapons from Syria. (Suffice to say, it's been a bad week for Rice's credibility.)

Over at The American Interest, Sean Keeley observes that the Obama administration most certainly knew that the public line they were pushing about removing chemical weapons from Syria was a lie:

In Congressional testimony last February, Obama's Director of National Intelligence James Clapper acknowledged "gaps and inconsistencies in Syria's declaration," validating reports that Syria was still hiding banned chemicals at undisclosed locations. And on its way out the door in January of this year, the Obama Treasury quietly introduced new sanctions against Syrian officials involved in chemical warfare. Buried in the language sanctioning a particular official was a telling admission: "As of 2016, Abbas has continued operating at locations in Syria associated with chemical warfare-related missions."

Whether or not the Obama Administration knew of this particular sarin facility, then, they clearly knew that Syrians were still clinging to their stockpiles at several locations. They knew what Adam Garfinkle has been saying all along: that Obama's deal to remove chemical weapons was not a historic diplomatic triumph but an unenforcable sham that the Syrians and Russians never intended to comply with.

Despite such evidence of dishonesty, the media have been awfully credulous about the Obama administration's self-serving claim of having rid Syria of chemical weapons. Now we know better. In fact, Keeley goes on to note that general revulsion at participating in the Obama administration's dangerous charade has led many former Obama administration officials to support President Trump's actions in Syria.

View original post here:
Obama Administration Knew Syria Still Had Chemical Weapons, Despite Saying Otherwise - The Weekly Standard

A ‘Not-Obama’ Foreign Policy That Keeps Obama’s Worst Policies – The American Conservative

As Ive said before, Trumps foreign policy mostly boils down to anything but Obama:

No matter how Trump ultimately comes out of the foreign-policy ideology test, what he really seems to want to be on the world stage is the not-Obama. And when faced with a choice, the best way to understand what Trump will do is to expect he will opt to differentiate himself as much as possible from his predecessor.

Hes proved hes not Obamaand thats useful to him, one former senior Obama official told me, one of many veterans of the previous administration I spoke with Friday who were supportive of Trumps airstrike on Syria.

It fits the pattern I mentioned earlier this week. Whenever one party takes over the presidency from the other, there is always some of this, but in Trumps case positioning against many of the things Obama was for explains more about his foreign policy because he has so few set views on these issues. Unfortunately, the anti-Obama positioning only seems to run in one direction: more intervention and less diplomatic engagement. Trump isnt cancelling Obamas support for the war on Yemen. On the contrary, he has increased U.S. support for that atrocious war, and may increase it even more in the future. He isnt scaling back the war on ISIS, but instead has escalated it. He wants to undo the few things that Obama got right, and he wants to make Obamas worst policies even worse.

Perhaps the most alarming way that Trumps foreign policy is unlike that of his predecessor is in his decision-making process, or rather his lack of much of a process. Obama was usually slow and deliberative to a fault, and Trump is very hasty and erratic. If Obama sometimes seemed to want to ponder options endlessly, Trump is at the much riskier extreme of acting impulsively without considering the consequences. That has been on display in other ways for a long time, but it is particularly dangerous when it comes to ordering the use of force. As Emma Ashford notes, Trump seems to be prone to making snap judgments on the use of force. Given how poor his judgment seems to be, his willingness to order attacks quickly without thinking through the implications is that much more disturbing.

Go here to see the original:
A 'Not-Obama' Foreign Policy That Keeps Obama's Worst Policies - The American Conservative