Mediaboss Marketing

The Libertarian Party has chosen Chase Oliver as their 2024 presidential nominee ahead of Robert F Kennedy Jr and Donald Trump, who failed to qualify.

The 38-year-old, who has run numerous times for Congress in Georgia, was elected after seven rounds of voting at the partys convention in Washington DC, on Sunday, beating the likes of Michael Rectenwald and Mike ter Maat to the nod.

Mr Oliver told CNN after his victory that speaking to as many people as possible would be key to making an impact in a contest all but certain to be dominated by President Joe Biden and Mr Trump and pledged to be a fly in the ointment of the two-party system.

He added that he believed securing 2 per cent of the national vote in November was a realistic goal, commenting: I got 2.1 per cent of the vote when I ran for the Senate in Georgia. I think thats a definite doable thing, and certainly, we can improve upon that with a hard-run campaign that wakes people up.

Mr Oliver has called for expanded work visas, a smoother pathway to citizenship for immigrants to the United States, the decriminalisation of abortion and denounced American involvement in foreign wars.

He was also vocal in his condemnation of Mr Trump, saying it had been a mistake to invite him to the Libertarians convention and telling the Republican: You are not a libertarian Youre a war criminal and you deserve to be shamed by everyone in this hall.

Embarrassingly, Mr Kennedy who is effectively running a spoiler campaign as an independent against the Democratic and Republican nominees and addressed the convention on Friday was rejected for the nomination in the first round of voting, picking up just 2.07 per cent of the vote from 19 delegates.

That came after he had rowed back his decision not to seek the Libertarian Partys nomination, which would have granted him ballot access in 37 states, telling chair Angela McArdle that he would accept if chosen, only to find he had very little support in the room.

Mr Trump also had a pretty dire time of it in DC, failing to even qualify for voting and picking up just two write-in ballots (a third, a joke at his expense, nominated Stormy Daniels, the adult film star at the center of his ongoing hush money trial in New York), after his speech was resoundingly booed on Saturday night.

The Republican had told the crowd at the Washington Hilton that the Libertarian Party should nominate Trump for president, only for howls of derision to ring out.

Thats nice, he retaliated sarcastically, with a rictus grin.

Maybe you dont want to win. Only do that if you want to win. If you want to lose, dont do that. Keep getting three per cent every four years.

He was subsequently busy on Truth Social attempting to firefight the disaster after a clip of the booing went viral, insisting he could have won the Libertarian nomination if he really wanted to and attacking Mr Kennedy, declaring: Only a FOOL would vote for him!

View original post here:
Libertarian Party names presidential nominee as RFK Jr crashes out of race and Trump fails to qualify - Yahoo News Canada

The Libertarian Party does not run on flattery. The partys remnant establishment gathered for its national convention at the Washington Hilton on Memorial Day weekend and introduced the mostly foreign-born hotel staff in the underground, sci-fi-themed banquet hall to their resigned sarcasm and attitude of indifference toward success as Americas largest gadfly political party.

According to both the hours of floor time spent contesting delegates whose credentials had been refused and my conversations with delegates, the party seems more interested in ironing out internal disputes than clarifying its external image and message.

Reactions to the presence of President Donald Trump and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. among the delegates varied: Some were disappointed because of their respective campaigns ideological impurity; Amity Pickeral, a Virginia delegate who nominated Joshua Smith for the presidency, said repeatedly, of both big names, Hes not a libertarian! Others were frustrated because of a perception that the invitation to Trump sacrificed the partys priorities on the altar of fundraising and media attention. Others had a free-speech maximalist detachment.

Jacob Luria, who ran for a seat in the Colorado House of Representatives as a Libertarian in 2022, said that he has considered voting for Kennedy but lamented the effect that Kennedys candidacy could have on the Libertarian Partys voter turnout in November. I didnt hate the idea that at one point he was seeking our nomination Part of that is because I imagine what the party would look like if we had Ross Perot run on our ticket [in 1992].

Instead the party ran Andre Marrou, an Alaskan, during that cycle. He picked up 0.28 percent of the national vote while Perot earned almost 19 percent. Perot saw his best performance in Marrous home state, where Perot almost overcame Bill Clinton with 28 percent of voters in the Last Frontier.

Though there is room for speculation about missed opportunities for the 1992 LP, it remains true that the partys presidential nominee has performed better in every cycle since then. Through the decades, the LP has enjoyed marginal growth, even with Perots second go in 1996, Ralph Naders Green run the same year, Pat Buchanans Reform candidacy and Naders heftier returns in 2000, and Naders proof of persistence in 2004 and 2008.

Between 1984 and 2012, the results for the LP cemented its reputation as a less-than-one-percent contingent of the national bloc. The average percentage of Americans who voted for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the 11 races between the partys founding and 2012 is 0.44 percent.

When the 2016 and 2020 races are included, the average jumps to 0.72 percent of the national electorate. In 2016, two former governors, Gary Johnson and Bill Weld, brought home over three percent of the vote, an anomaly from the partys typical performance, with Alaska, Oklahoma, and Johnsons home state of New Mexico getting out the highest vote for the Libertarians.

After that surprise performance, the Trump campaign did not set out to gather the strayed sheep back to the herd at the partys 2020 convention. But, back then, Kennedys candidacy was not a factor. Its unlikely that Trump would have appeared to speak to the Libertarian delegates if Kennedy were not in the race.

Party delegates hadnt gotten to naming their partys candidate by the time Trump arrived on Saturday night. In the end, after seven rounds of voting, by a simple majority vote, they selected Chase Oliver, whose purported homosexuality, desire for an Ellis Island style of processing immigrants, and call for an end to federal mandatory minimum sentencing places him firmly in the partys left wing.

Trumps performance was not for the sake of striking a contrast between himself and the eventual party nominee, but rather between himself and Kennedy. It worked. The crowd size during Trumps speech at the convention was approximately double that of Kennedys. The spirited air in the room came not only from party delegates but also from energized D.C. Young Republicans who arrived to drown out the boos of the partys less inhibited members, who were served drinks before Trumps speech and only after Kennedys.

In his more analytical fashion, Kennedy opened his speech with a claim that Libertarian voters should elect leaders who are inspired by [the Constitution] and who will wield it to inspire others and that neither President Trump nor President Biden pass this critical examination. Kennedy transitioned from his broadside against both major party candidates with more sustained attacks against Trump, mentioning the frontrunners name 12 times throughout his speech versus five references to Biden.

Trump, for his part, did not mention Kennedy but continued to wage an offensive against President Biden along with occasional gibes at the LPs poor performance: Libertarians could win with him or could keep getting your three percent every four years. The latter option of gathering three percent of the nations vote, as the partys historical results prove, is more an indication of Trumps generosity than anything for which the party could reasonably hope in the upcoming election.

But politeness seems to be foreign currency for a party whose delegates boo the frontrunners call for support after he pledged to put a libertarian in his cabinet and to commute the sentence of Ross Ulbricht to time served on the first day of his administration.

Trumps pledge to free the tech wiz with a cult following is no ancillary concern for the partys delegates. The LPs communications director confirmed to TAC that Free Ross Ulbricht was the policy action that received the highest number of votes from party members for Trump to address, over Free Julian Assange and Defend the Second Amendment. Far and away the most popular sign in the convention hall during Trumps address was one that read, Free Ross.

Voters who align with the partys principled disdain for political prosecutions will be tested on Election Day when the object of the current regimes most flagrant political conviction stands to return as head of state.

Go here to see the original:
Showdown at the Libertarian Convention - The American Conservative

When the Libertarian Party recently invited Donald Trump to speak at its annual convention later this month, the move sparked plenty of outrage inside the partyand a lot of intrigue outside it.

The idea that I completely wrote the GOP off only to have Trump follow me into the Libertarian Party really upsets me and upsets a lot of people, Jonathan Casey, whose involvement in Libertarian Party politics dates back to 2016, told The Dispatch.

Until the Trump invitation, the Libertarian Party had mostly been an afterthought for outside observers in the 2024 presidential campaign, but it shouldnt have been. Whoever wins the partys nomination for president later this month at the Libertarian National Convention will be on the ballot in at least 37 states, including the battlegrounds of Arizona, Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Nevada. The last two presidential election were decided by a few states where the victor prevailed by less than 1 percentage point, so its plausible the Libertarian candidate could sway the outcomeeven if he falls short of winning the 3.3 percent of the national popular vote won by 2016 Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson or the 1.2 percent of the popular vote garnered by 2020 nominee Jo Jorgenson.

So why, exactly, did a minor party whose raison dtre is to reject the two major parties invite the presumptive GOP nominee to potentially overshadow the convention where Libertarian Party delegates will pick their own presidential nominee? That is a hotly contested question within a Libertarian Party that is deeply divided between two factionsthe Mises Caucus and the Classical Liberal Caucus.

The Mises Caucus is the Libertarian Partys largest faction whose members swept to power at the partys 2022 convention in a backlash against what they saw as an increasingly politically correct party that didnt do enough to stand up to COVID lockdowns and was happy to run Republican Party retreads for president. The Classical Liberal Caucus is filled with, well, self-styled classical liberals who see Mises Caucus types as Trump-adjacent bigots and kooksor at least way too tolerant of bigots and kooks.

Heading into the 2024 convention, the Mises Caucus has endorsed presidential candidate Michael Rectenwald, a former New York University professor who says he converted from Marxism to anarcho-capitalism after he was the victim of a woke mob at NYU. On Friday, the Classical Liberals endorsed Chase Oliver, a former Democrat who was the Libertarian Partys 2022 Senate candidate in Georgia.

The Classical Liberals contend that by turning the convention into a Trump rally, the Mises Caucus leaders of the Libertarian Party are not only trying to help Trump win the general election, theyre also trying to depress turnout of delegates who might oppose the Mises Caucus candidates running for party leadership and the presidential nomination.

The Trump invitation is absolutely designed to discourage anybody who would challenge [the Mises Caucus] from showing up, said Casey, who serves as chair of the Classical Liberal Caucus. Moreover, Joshua Eakle, a classical liberal who served as Tennessee state party chairman until 2021, worries that if Rectenwald wins the Libertarian Party nomination, he could theoretically suspend his campaign, either immediately after being endorsed or, say, before the election and endorse Trump.

Members of the Mises Caucus strongly deny those accusations. Im not going to drop out to support any other candidate. Im gonna run as hard as I can, Rectenwald told The Dispatch. Mises Caucus Chair Aaron Harris said the decision to invite Trump, as well as President Joe Biden and independent Robert F. Kennedy Jr., was meant to increase interest in the Libertarian Party: The long and short of it is the media wont really cover usthe mainstream media wont cover usthey wont let us in the debate. So lets see what buzz we can create on our own. While Biden declined the invitation, RFK Jr. accepted and challenged Trump to a debate at the convention (something Trump has not agreed to do).

The difference between Trump and Biden is like the difference between stomach cancer and pancreatic cancer. You definitely dont want either one, but one might kill you a little slower, Harris said, before identifying Trump as maybe the less-bad cancer. Were not trying to game this to support Trump. If anything, I think us helping elevate interest in alternative candidates is going to hurt both of them and be a wild card in this election.

How Trump could hurt Trump.

Its not clear what Trumps objective is by showing up at the Libertarian convention, but theres actually a decent chance it could backfire on him. If Trumps presence at the convention does help Rectenwald win the nomination, that would likely hurt Trump in the general election because Rectenwalds anti-woke and anti-abortion stances would almost certainly draw more votes away from Trump than Biden.

On the other hand, Oliver, the candidate backed by the Classical Liberal Caucus, would likely draw more votes from Biden than Trump because Oliver is a former Democratic antiwar activist who favors enacting a federal statutory right to abortion.

So what does Trump have to gain from showing up at the Libertarian Convention? I dont think he cares one way or the other who our presidential nominee is, Casey of the Classical Liberal Caucus told The Dispatch. I think his motivation for coming to speak to the Libertarian Party is that he looks at this as a campaign rally where he can go up on a stage that has Libertarian Party branding, Libertarian Party crowd, and he can create an ad for himself, essentially. That message? I spoke to the Libertarians, and they loved me, as Casey put it.

Indeed, Trump could be competing for the much larger faction of self-identified libertarians who never vote for the Libertarian Party candidate. A recent poll, which has not been publicly released, conducted by YouGov for the libertarian Cato Institute found that 15 percent of Americans self-identified as libertarian, according to Catos director of polling, Emily Ekins. The respondents were evenly split between Trump and Biden at 41 percent apiece. Trump, of course, also needs to be concerned about Kennedy, who is courting libertarians with his record of opposing COVID vaccines.

Michael Rectenwalds play for the populist faction.

While RFK Jr. may win far more votes than the Libertarian Party nominee, Rectenwald seems like exactly the kind of candidate who could shave half a point off of Trumps margin if he is the nominee.

I was a Marxist and a full professor at NYU when the woke mob came for me, when I voiced criticisms of social justice and university policies that had become official dogma of the university, Rectenwald told The Dispatch. When I saw what totalitarians leftists are, I immediately became a civil libertarian. A conversion to full-scale economic and political libertarianism followed shortly thereafter.

Rectenwald characterized the last two Libertarian Party nominees, former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson and Clemson University professor Jo Jorgenson as milquetoast candidates who did not excite anybody. Rectenwald likened himself to Argentinian President Javier Millei and said his own political philosophy begins with the premise that government is an evil, that it is a thief, and that its a parasiteand it sucks the blood out of the body politic. And so what we need to do is get it out of our lives as much as humanly possible with the ultimate goal of a stateless societyanarcho-capitalist order.

Its Rectenwalds anti-woke record and association with alt-right figures that could hurt Trump come November. Rectenwald says he was pushed toward taking a leave of absence after he revealed that he had been tweeting under the screen name Deplorable NYU Prof in 2016 (though NYU administrators dispute Rectenwalds version of events). In 2016, New York University canceled a scheduled appearance from alt-right provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos, and Rectenwald invited Yiannopoulos to speak to one of his classes in 2018. The event was again canceled due to threats of violence. Asked what was the academic value of inviting Yiannopoulos to speak in a college classroom, Rectenwald replied: Milo, for whatever his faults, is a very brilliant guy. Asked about Yiannopoulos record of antisemitic rhetoric, Rectenwald said: At the time that I had invited him, there wasnt any indication of that at all. But whatever hes done since is on himlike palling around with Ye, or, you know, Nick Fuentes and all that, I think thats pretty abominable. But Im not here to check him. There was in fact plenty of evidence of Yiannopouloss racist and anti-semitic rhetoric prior to 2018.

Asked to name the worst aspects of the Trump presidency, Recetnwald replied: Operation Warp Speed, the lockdowns, eight-plus trillion dollars in inflationary spending as well as Trumps buffoonish and antagonistic rhetoric. What was wrong with Operation Warp Speed? The vaccine was not properly vetted, Rectenwald said.

On fiscal issues, Rectenwald said that there should be an off ramp for completely winding down entitlements like Social Security and Medicare of at least for four to five years, so it is somewhat precipitous, but not too much so that you end up with a social catastrophe.

While, like Trump, Rectenwald says the federal government shouldnt have a role in setting abortion policy, he draws a contrast by voicing support for state-level laws that ban almost all abortions, except in cases of rape or when the life or physical health of the mother is threatened. Philosophically, I think abortion is an egregious violation of the non-aggression principle, Rectenwald said, referring to one of the basic tenets of libertarianism. It is aggression against a person. I believe that it is a person regardless of the size or stage of development.

Rectenwald also thinks states should ban transgender surgeries and puberty-blockers or hormone treatments for minors because people under 18 do not have the ability to consent, but once youre of age, if you want to change your body in whatever way you think you can, you have a perfect right to do so.

Chase Olivers antiwar roots.

As the candidate endorsed by the Classical Liberal Caucus, Oliver cuts a much different profile. While Rectenwalds interaction with a woke mob brought him to Libertarian politics, Oliver came into the party as a Democratic antiwar activist who thought Barack Obamas first term was too militaristic because he failed to close the Guantanamo Bay detention facility and end drone warfare. I became politically homeless until I found the Libertarian Party, campaigning at the Atlanta Pride festival in 2010, Oliver told The Dispatch.

While both Rectenwald and Oliver favor cutting off U.S. military aid to Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, Oliver was particularly passionate in condemning Israels war against Hamas. October 7 was a horrible day for the people of Israel, like theres no questioning that what Hamas did was horrible. But the response back has been equally terrible, Oliver told The Dispatch. It has killed so many more innocent peoplelike tens of thousands of innocent people. When pressed on using the phrase equally terrible to describe Hamass attack deliberately targeting civilians and Israels military response targeting Hamas, Oliver apologized and said the actions were not equal but both were morally indefensible.

What I mean to say is that the [Israeli] response is not morally defensible, just as obviously what Hamas did is not morally defensible, he said.

Oliver and Rectenwald more notably differ on domestic issues. On abortion, for example, Oliver supports enacting a federal statute creating a national right to abortion until an unborn child can survive outside the womb and prohibiting abortion after that point except to protect the life of the mother. Thats the standard that I would like to see federally because I think its a matter of bodily autonomy and medical privacy which fit into our constitutional rights, Oliver said, pointing to the Fifth and 14th amendments. Hed like to phase out Social Security and Medicare over a matter of decades, not four or five years. Hes OK with state bans on transgender surgeries for minors, but not restricting puberty blockers.

Asked if Trump or Biden presents a greater danger to the country, Oliver replied: Theyre both turds, right, and they both stink. Im not going to sit here and try to determine which one is better than the other. He added that Biden and Trump are both representative of authoritarian policies to which the Libertarians seek to be wholly distinct from.

A missed opportunity for libertarians?

Its far from clear that either Rectenwald or Oliver will win the nomination at the convention later this month. Roughly 1,000 national delegates will continue voting until one candidate emerges with a majority of the vote, and Joshua Eakle suggested the most viable strategy to secure the nomination is to basically just be everyones second choice.

During a time of deep dissatisfaction with the Republican and Democrat at the top of the ticket, why hasnt the Libertarian Party taken off as a vehicle for a more mainstream center-right presidential candidate who has held elective office before? In 2020, candidate recruitment efforts faltered amid concerns nominating a libertarian Republican like Michigan Rep. Justin Amash would help reelect Trump, resulting in a lackluster candidate like Jorgensen. Infighting since 2022 has certainly dimmed the partys prospects as well.

But Emily Ekins of the Cato Institute pointed to something more fundamentalwhat political scientists call Duvergers lawthats holding back the Libertarian Party. When you have an electoral system like ours, which is single-member districts, first past the postso whoever wins the most votes wins the whole thing, winner-take-allthat tends to create a system with two parties, said Ekins. No third party will take off unless the electoral system is different.

Visit link:
Will the Trumpification of the Libertarian Party Actually Hurt Donald Trump? - The Dispatch

In the 2010 midterm elections, FreedomWorks packed Utahs state Republican Party convention with Tea Party activists, who came to bounce incumbent U.S. Senator Bob Bennett from his seat in favor of the right-wing neo-libertarian Mike Lee. The trick worked; Bennett came in third in the convention vote, leaving Lee to duke it out with businessman Tim Bridgewater in the caucuses, where he won.

FreedomWorkss ultimate aim appeared to be to destabilize Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. In McConnells home state of Kentucky, FreedomWorks, working with Jim DeMint, then the junior senator from South Carolina and leader of the Senate Conservatives Fund, launched the insurgent candidacy of Rand Paul for the nomination, in opposition to the more establishment candidate Trey Grayson, who was anointed by McConnell. Rand Paul prevailed. McConnell got the message, and began his bend further to the right.

In 2010, I interviewed Adam Brandon, then FreedomWorkss communications director before his ascendance to the organizations presidency, about FWs aim with its backing of insurgent Senate candidates. America needed more senators like DeMint, who opposed health care, energy reform, and labor unions, he said, in order to create something of a caucusa new power center, Brandon called it.

Excerpt from:
How FreedomWorks Paved the Way for Trumpismand for Its Own Demise - The New Republic

The Libertarian Party of Michigan on Wednesday posted an antisemitic cartoon depicting Jews as puppet masters who control both the Democratic and Republican parties in the US.

The graphic was posted on multiple social media platforms, but gained particular traction on X/Twitter, where it received widespread blowback but also a chuck of support garnering over 1,000 likes before it was ultimately deleted.

The Libertarian Party of Michigan did not respond to The Algemeiners request for comment for this story.

I know some people think of me as libertarian. I have used that word to describe myself at times, journalist Brad Polumbo wrote in response to the graphic. But please understand that I have no affiliation whatsoever with whatever the fk this is.

Max Abrahms, a professor of political science at Northeastern University, wrote, Ive found that foreign policy libertarians are more likely to (1) view themselves as smart, (2) view themselves as smarter than they are, (3) condescend when theyre dilettantes on national security issues, (4) and yes have issues with Jews.

This is not the first time the Libertarian Party has been accused of promoting antisemitism. In August 2022, the Libertarian Party of New Hampshire posted a now-deleted tweet reading, Six million dollar minimum wage or youre antisemitic, in a reference to the 6 million Jews murdered by the Nazis during the Holocaust.

Then, a few months later, the national party tweeted out a depiction of Sam Bankman-Fried the fraudster who ran FTX that many argued was antisemitic.

Additionally, the Mises Caucus wing of the Libertarian Party invited an activist named Bryan Sharpe (or Hotep Jesus), who many consider antisemitic, to speak at its convention back in 2021. A Mises Caucus leading member said, regarding the invitation: I dont actually think that someone who is trying to be a truth-seeker and understand whats going on and asked the question about whether or not Jews run Hollywood is an antisemite.

Many observers have pointed out that it is important to make a distinction between the Libertarian Party and people who generally think of themselves as libertarian, arguing the latter merely describes a worldview that prioritizes liberty in economic and social affairs. Meanwhile, the party is seen by many to have been taken over by extremists.

Liz Wolfe, a journalist at Reason, noted she believes the better question is Whats going on with the Libertarian Party? Certainly not the same as libertarianism.

I mean, I dont feel like their antisemitic posting represents what I value, she continued. Far from it.

The rest is here:
'The Zionists Always Get Their Way': Libertarian Party of Michigan Posts Antisemitic Cartoon Depicting Jews as Puppet ... - Algemeiner