Mediaboss Marketing

Polls open in Charlottes Democratic primaries at 6:30 a.m. Tuesday.

Democrats and unaffiliated voters will choose candidates for mayor and the top four candidates in a crowded field for four at-large seats on the city council.

Each member of 12-seat Charlotte City Council is up for election this fall, but District 1s Dante Anderson and District 7s Ed Driggs are running unopposed.

Three seats on the council, Districts 2, 4 and 5, only have Democrats running and will be decided in the primary.

Turnout has been low during early voting. Since early voting began Aug. 24, 8,467 people have cast ballots, according to data from the Mecklenburg County Board of Elections.

In the mayoral primary, Democrat Lucille Puckett will challenge incumbent Vi Lyles. Its a rematch from the last mayoral race when Lyles beat Puckett by a wide margin.

Lyles is running for a fourth term leading North Carolina's largest city.

The winner of the mayoral primary will go up against Republican Misun Kim and Libertarian Rob Yates in the General Election Nov. 7.

Democrats will have primaries for Charlotte City Council's at-large seats and Districts 2, 3, 4 and 5. (Mecklenburg County)

In the race for Charlottes four at-large seats on city council, seven Democrats are running for the nomination. Voters will choose their four top candidates.

Incumbent council member and Mayor Pro-Tem Braxton Winston is not running for reelection.

Libertarian Steven DiFiore will challenge the Democrats in the General Election for city council at-large.

Here are the candidates for the other contested primaries in Charlotte:

District 2

District 3

District 4

District 5

Polling places across the city will open at 6:30 a.m. and close at 7:30 p.m. Anyone in line at 7:30 p.m. will be allowed to vote.

Voting will be open to Democrats and unaffiliated voters to choose their nominees for the General Election.

Queen City voters can get a sample ballot and find their polling place here.

People will be required to show photo ID to cast a ballot.

The General Election will be on Nov. 7.

The 2023 local elections are the first to require voters to show photo ID with the new law.

The address on the ID does not have to match the voters registration records.

Kristin Mavromatis, with the Mecklenburg County Board of Elections, said most voters should not need to worry about the new requirement.

The easiest thing is that, if you have a drivers license or state ID from DMV, youre already good to go. Just bring your drivers license or your North Carolina state ID. Show that, and you will have no issues, Mavromatis said.

Voters can also use other photo ID cards, including passports, military IDs and approved student or employee IDs. The State Board of Elections has a full list of approved IDs.

For those without a photo ID, people can get one for free from the North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles. County election boards will also provide free photo IDs to people who need them to vote, and require less paperwork than the DMV.

There are also exceptions for people who cannot show ID, including lack of transportation, disability or illness, not having the documents needed to get an ID, or for a lost or stolen ID.

Voters who ask for exceptions will have to cast a provisional ballot, which must be reviewed by the county Board of Elections. Voters can also bring their ID to the county elections office after they cast their ballot, as long as its before the county canvas date.

Read the original:
Charlotte's primary elections are Tuesday: 5 things to know - Spectrum News

The November election that put Republican David Cole in the Alabama House of Representatives was one of the most competitive in the state with Democrat Marilyn Lands earning 45% of the votes to Coles nearly 52%.

Cole vacated the House District 10 seat in Madison County last month in a felony plea deal. Whether a special election is as competitive as last years will likely largely depend on the candidate the GOP backs and voter turnout.

Jess Brown, a retired Athens State University political science professor said HD10 is still Republican leaning.

But the key to 2022 was that Democrats simply had a candidate with a wide network of friends and contacts in the district, Brown said. Marilyn Lands had roots in the district.

Cole didnt have those roots or prior civic experience, Brown said.

Lands did not return requests for comment for this article.

Brown said that even if she runs again and Democrats would be foolish not to nominate her and the party provides resources for a strong get-out-the-vote campaign, they may not have the luxury of a GOP newcomer and novice on the ballot.

My guess is that Republicans will field a stronger candidate, Brown said. Youre not going to have the same landscape that you had in 2022.

Cole resigned his seat last week after entering a plea deal on a felony voter fraud charge. His residency had been in question since before the November election when he ran for the open House seat and had been the subject of both a party and court challenge.

Coles wasnt the only controversy in that race. The ALGOP kicked Anson Knowles off the primary ballot in February because of his previous activity in the Libertarian Party. He wont be seeking the seat this year. Knowles said he is again active in the Libertarian Party in Madison County doing candidate training.

I tried running as a Republican and the Republicans didnt want me, Knowles told ADN recently.

Libertarian Elijah Boyd received about 3% of the vote in November and said hes considering running again.

A special election does have benefits especially for third-party candidates in that we are not affected by any drama at the national level of party politics, Boyd said. He also thinks a special election removed the impact of straight-ticket voting. Bigger races up the ballot generally benefit Republicans down the ballot.

We dont have a chance to reach people if theyre just going to punch one button, he said.

But a single-race election will also reduce turnout, Brown said. Special elections have lower turnout than those in regular cycles.

When the turnout drops, generally speaking, youre more likely to have Democrats not show up than Republicans, Brown said.

Gov. Kay Ivey on Monday said the special election primary will be Dec. 12. A primary runoff, if needed, will be Jan. 9 and the general election will be March 26.

The 2024 legislative session starts Feb. 6.

I encourage everyone in this district to get out and vote during this special election to ensure you have a strong voice advocating for you in the Alabama Legislature, Ivey said in a written statement.

The rest is here:
House District 10 was competitive last year. Will it be in a special ... - Alabama Daily News

I wont confess everything, but I will admit that I was once a great fan of Murray Rothbard (1926-1995), the economist who was nicknamed Mr. Libertarian. I was reminded of that when I saw him mentioned in a Financial Times column a few days ago: Jonathan Derbyshire, Libertarianism Is Having a Moment With Argentinas Milei, August 31, 2023.

The column focuses on Javier Milei, who is the favorite to win the upcoming presidential election in Argentina (see also Argentina Could Get Its First Libertarian President, The Economist, January 14, 2023). Milei, who defines himself as an anarcho-capitalist la Rothbard, is a fan of the latter and named one of his dogs after him. The fact that Milei is apparently also a fan of Donald Trump does not bode well for the future. The Financial Times columnist does get Trumps anti-libertarianism right, albeit not to its full extent. But he is wrong in suggesting that Republican primaries candidate Vivek Ramaswamy could (or, at any rate, should) be embraced by the libertarian movement. Anti-libertarians have been elected before Trump, but this is not an excuse for libertarians to compete down to the bottom of the barrel. If we are to believe The Economist, many of Mr. Mileis political allies are not exactly paragons of libertarianism either. I do think that libertarianism and classical liberalism should be a big tent, but there is a limit somewhere.

Rothbards system had an apparent advantage, which was also its big defect: it had an obvious, definitive, nearly religious answer to any and all questions. I was bothered by some of his claims, like the right of a child to run away from home whenever he wants to because he is thereby asserting his natural right of self-ownership (The Ethics of Liberty, p. 102). I also had doubts about his economics, although it took me some time to recognize their significance. He had a deep distaste for, or fear of, anything that looked like mathematics. He did not realize that, as J. Williard Gibbs said, mathematics is a language. He did not see the relationship between mathematics and logic. For instance, he could not understand that his supposedly ordinal marginal utility is mathematically impossible if utility is ordinal (that is, just a ranking as opposed to a cardinal measure). It makes no sense to chop an ordinal value into identifiable (uniquely defined) marginal pieces. So he was unknowingly using a concept of cardinal utility.

What Rothbard was missing had been explained by John Hicks (a future Nobel economics laureate) and Roy Allen in two famous 1934 Economica articles, A Reconsideration of the Theory of Value. Hicks and Allen formalized an ordinal theory of utility, which Irving Fisher, Vilfredo Pareto, and perhaps other economists had already postulated but not exactly specified. As Hicks and Allen put it, if total utility is not quantitatively definable, neither is marginal utility. Lionel Robbins, who represented a mix of the Austrian and neoclassical schools of economics, mentioned Hicks and Allens advance in the 1935 edition of his Essay on the Nature of Significance of Economic Science.

Changing ones opinion for good reasons is not a cardinal sin.

Sometime around the turn of the millennium, I asked Anthony de Jasay, who described himself as a liberal and an anarchist, why he did not use the anarcho-capitalist label. He answered, I do not wish to be counted as one of that company, or perhaps simply I dont like the company. (Although I quoted the first sentence elsewhere, the latter also hangs in my memory. I should have written it down at the time.) I think Tonys statement was meant as a criticism of the Rothbardian sort of anarcho-capitalism.

Lets hope Mr. Milei wins the election in October and does not oblige libertarians all over the world to walk back their support or, worse, lead them to Trumpianize the libertarian movement.

See the original post:
Murray Rothbard in the Financial Times - Econlib

A businessman who is seeking the Republican presidential nomination, Vivek Ramaswamy, says he will lay out a legal and constitutional basis for shutting down federal agencies with executive power during a speech Wednesday at the America First Policy Institute at Washington, D.C.

Shutting down the Department of Education has long been a Republican talking point, but Mr. Ramaswamy and much of the New Right a constellation of mostly young thinkers and activists unburdened by conservative orthodoxy want to go further, promising to shut down a host of alphabet agencies, like the FBI, the IRS, and the ATF. Mr. Ramaswamy says if elected president, he will reduce the workforce of the federal bureaucracy swamp by 75 percent.

Mr. Ramaswamy calls the unelected bureaucrats at Washington collecting a paycheck from taxpayers through Republican and Democrat administrations the fourth branch of government and he wants it gone. His pledge sounds a lot like President Trumps 2016 drain the swamp campaign promise, but Mr. Ramaswamys pitch is that he is the smart, adept one who can actually get it done.

They duped presidents from Reagan to Trump by telling them they couldnt do it. And on solid legal authority we are, on Wednesday, going to lay out exactly how we will get that done in a way that goes far beyond any historical GOP talking points, Mr. Ramaswamy told reporters Sunday at an event at New Hampshire. It takes the America First movement to the next level.

At a barbecue at New Hampshire Sunday hosted by a cryptocurrency millionaire and former Republican U.S. Senate candidate, Bruce Fenton, Mr. Ramaswamy articulated his vision in revolutionary terms. The tables were adorned with Gadsden flags, tricorn hats, and faux-aged copies of the U.S. Constitution. Mr. Fenton is part of the Free State Project, a movement to get liberty lovers to move to New Hampshire, influence state politics, and create a libertarian homeland.

Do you want incremental reform, or do you want revolution? Mr. Ramaswamy asked the crowd of about 150 people. I think thats the real choice we face in the GOP primary.

A 38-year-old biotech entrepreneur, Mr. Ramaswamy favors revolution, and the crowd ate it up. He painted a dark vision of the state of the country, saying that Americans are starved for purpose and meaning and identity.

At a time in our national history, with the things that used to fill the void faith, patriotism, hard work, family these things have disappeared, Mr. Ramaswamy said. And when you have a black hole in your heart that runs that deep, that is when the poison fills the void: woke-ism, transgenderism, climate-ism, Covid-ism, globalism. As I sometimes joke around now, Zelensky-ism.

This American carnage articulation recalls Mr. Trump and runs in direct contrast to the Reaganite optimism of Republican presidential candidates such as Ambassador Nikki Haley and Vice President Pence. Were not looking for a new national identity, Mr. Pence argued with Mr. Ramaswamy at the Republican presidential debate. The American people are the most faith-filled, freedom-loving, idealistic, hard-working people the world has ever known.

Its not morning in America, Mr. Ramaswamy shot back.

Mr. Ramaswamys opposition to funding the war in Ukraine is another point of departure from traditional Republicanism. These divisions reflect a larger split within the conservative movement between the Nikki Haleys of the world and the younger, ber-online right that is attracted to Messrs. Ramaswamy and DeSantis and their scorched-earth vision of dismantling the administrative state, or as Mr. DeSantis said last month, when referring to reducing the federal workforce, slitting throats on day one.

Mr. Ramaswamy says he used to identify as libertarian and didnt vote in his 20s because he was jaded. His message about shutting down government agencies, pardoning Julian Assange of Wikileaks, and freeing the founder of the dark web drug sales site Silk Road, Ross Ulbricht, has earned him praise from many of the young, online right.

Several libertarian-leaning guests on Tim Pools YouTube show recently praised Mr. Ramaswamy for these promises. Mr. Ramaswamy is making the rounds of podcasts, YouTube shows, and other new media to attract this younger jaded crowd.

Mr. Ramaswamy shares the techno-libertarian origins of many in the New Right, and his diagnosis of Americas maladies aligns him with the Curtis Yarvin democracy has failed acolytes and national divorce proponents like the Libertarian Party, but his prescription is more optimistic and grounded in a unified constitutional republic. Mr. Ramaswamy opposes national divorce, embraces one person, one vote, and calls this a 1776 moment.

Yet he also throws red meat to this crowd, imagining himself as a more capable Mr. Trump, the embodiment of America First 2.0 that can successfully knee-cap birthright citizenship for offspring of illegal immigrants, secure the southern border, and speak truth Mr. Ramaswamys campaign slogan on culture war issues. The campaign posted signs around the Fenton property that articulated these so-called truths according to Ramaswamy: Reverse racism is racism, There are two genders, and, Human flourishing requires fossil fuels.

We have to speak truth, Mr. Fenton tells the Sun. I have definitely been talking to a lot of liberty people and Free Staters about why I think Vivek is the guy.

Mr. Trump is leading in Republican polls by large margins, but Mr. Ramaswamys rise indicates there is a hunger for this direct, revolutionary messaging. The main stalwarts of libertarianism, like Reason Magazine, may not be endorsing Mr. Ramaswamys agenda, which deviates significantly from libertarian orthodoxy, but a significant portion of the online New Right is.

Mr. Ramaswamy says the drive among Republicans to compromise in their beliefs is misguided. I reject show up in the middle and compromise, hold hands, sing Kumbaya, Mr. Ramaswamy said. Were not going to tinker around the edges, were going to get in there and shut it down. Thats how you revive a constitutional republic.

Link:
Ramaswamy Set To Tee Up a Plan To 'Eviscerate' the Administrative ... - The New York Sun

Hualapai Tribe

Hualapai Tribes historic Osterman Gas Station on Route 66.

A few months ago, the National Trust for Historic Preservation placed the Osterman Gas Station in Peach Springs on its list of Americas most endangered historic places.

The concrete block building was built in the early days of the Great Depression from a Sears Roebuck catalog. It serviced vehicles on the legendary Route 66 for decades. Since then, its fallen into disrepair crippled by windstorms, microbursts and time.

Its currently owned by the Hualapai Tribe, which has a plan to revive it and is looking for funding to do so.

The list of endangered places has been around since the 1980s, but not everyone thinks every historic building should be preserved. In fact, Timothy Sandefur says while preserving the past is a worthy goal, it also represents a tradeoff, with costs and benefits that must be weighed as well.

Sandefur is the vice president of legal affairs with the Goldwater Institute, a libertarian think tank, and his views on historic preservation follow that libertarian streak. He was also, oddly enough, raised by a family of historic preservationists.

On the other hand, Beatrice Moore believes that preserving what little history we have in the metro Phoenix area is everything. Moore is the director of Grand Avenue Arts and Preservation and owner of multiple historic buildings in the Grand Avenue area.

The Show spoke with both Sandefur and Moore on their opinions on whether or not we should invest more into historic preservation.

See more here:
A debate over historic preservation and what deserves to be saved - KJZZ