Archive for the ‘Libertarian’ Category

Key Concepts of Libertarianism | Cato Institute

Individualism. Libertarians see the individual as the basic unit of social analysis. Only individuals make choices and are responsible for their actions. Libertarian thought emphasizes the dignity of each individual, which entails both rights and responsibility. The progressive extension of dignity to more people to women, to people of different religions and different races is one of the great libertarian triumphs of the Western world.

Individual Rights. Because individuals are moral agents, they have aright to be secure in their life, liberty, and property. These rights are not granted by government or by society; they are inherent in the nature of human beings. It is intuitively right that individuals enjoy the security of such rights; the burden of explanation should lie with those who would take rights away.

Spontaneous Order. Agreat degree of order in society is necessary for individuals to survive and flourish. Its easy to assume that order must be imposed by acentral authority, the way we impose order on astamp collection or afootball team. The great insight of libertarian social analysis is that order in society arises spontaneously, out of the actions of thousands or millions of individuals who coordinate their actions with those of others in order to achieve their purposes. Over human history, we have gradually opted for more freedom and yet managed to develop acomplex society with intricate organization. The most important institutions in human society language, law, money, and markets all developed spontaneously, without central direction. Civil society the complex network of associations and connections among people is another example of spontaneous order; the associations within civil society are formed for apurpose, but civil society itself is not an organization and does not have apurpose of its own.

The Rule of Law. Libertarianism is not libertinism or hedonism. It is not aclaim that people can do anything they want to, and nobody else can say anything. Rather, libertarianism proposes asociety of liberty under law, in which individuals are free to pursue their own lives so long as they respect the equal rights of others. The rule of law means that individuals are governed by generally applicable and spontaneously developed legal rules, not by arbitrary commands; and that those rules should protect the freedom of individuals to pursue happiness in their own ways, not aim at any particular result or outcome.

Limited Government. To protect rights, individuals form governments. But government is adangerous institution. Libertarians have agreat antipathy to concentrated power, for as Lord Acton said, Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Thus they want to divide and limit power, and that means especially to limit government, generally through awritten constitution enumerating and limiting the powers that the people delegate to government. Limited government is the basic political implication of libertarianism, and libertarians point to the historical fact that it was the dispersion of power in Europe more than other parts of the world that led to individual liberty and sustained economic growth.

Free Markets. To survive and to flourish, individuals need to engage in economic activity. The right to property entails the right to exchange property by mutual agreement. Free markets are the economic system of free individuals, and they are necessary to create wealth. Libertarians believe that people will be both freer and more prosperous if government intervention in peoples economic choices is minimized.

The Virtue of Production. Much of the impetus for libertarianism in the seventeenth century was areaction against monarchs and aristocrats who lived off the productive labor of other people. Libertarians defended the right of people to keep the fruits of their labor. This effort developed into arespect for the dignity of work and production and especially for the growing middle class, who were looked down upon by aristocrats. Libertarians developed apreMarxist class analysis that divided society into two basic classes: those who produced wealth and those who took it by force from others. Thomas Paine, for instance, wrote, There are two distinct classes of men in the nation, those who pay taxes, and those who receive and live upon the taxes. Similarly, Jefferson wrote in 1824, We have more machinery of government than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious. Modern libertarians defend the right of productive people to keep what they earn, against anew class of politicians and bureaucrats who would seize their earnings to transfer them to political clients and cronies.

Natural Harmony of Interests. Libertarians believe that there is anatural harmony of interests among peaceful, productive people in ajust society. One persons individual plans which may involve getting ajob, starting abusiness, buying ahouse, and so on may conflict with the plans of others, so the market makes many of us change our plans. But we all prosper from the operation of the free market, and there are no necessary conflicts between farmers and merchants, manufacturers and importers. Only when government begins to hand out rewards on the basis of political pressure do we find ourselves involved in group conflict, pushed to organize and contend with other groups for apiece of political power.

Peace. Libertarians have always battled the ageold scourge of war. They understood that war brought death and destruction on agrand scale, disrupted family and economic life, and put more power in the hands of the ruling class which might explain why the rulers did not always share the popular sentiment for peace. Free men and women, of course, have often had to defend their own societies against foreign threats; but throughout history, war has usually been the common enemy of peaceful, productive people on all sides of the conflict.

Read the rest here:
Key Concepts of Libertarianism | Cato Institute

‘The Matrix’ Universe and the Fight to Reclaim Free Will – The Great Courses Daily News

By David K. Johnson, Ph.D., Kings CollegeQuantum mechanics has taught us that determinism is false. On the quantum level, individual events happen randomly and without a cause all the time. (Image: MoVille/Shutterstock)A Deterministic Universe

Neo, the main character of The Matrix franchise, is informed by the Oracle that to fulfill the prophecies he must go to the computer mainframe called the Source. To do that, he has to find the Key Maker who has been abducted by an ancient program called the Merovingian.

When Neo, Morpheus and Trinity find Merovingian in a restaurant, he tells them that choice is an illusion. What he is referring to is the idea of determinism, which argues everything in the universe is predetermined and free will is just an illusion. The Merovingian believes we are living in a deterministic universe.

Many philosophers have tried to refute the idea of determinism, but thats a daunting task. Those who endorse the libertarian notion of free will are usually called agent causation theorists. They think that in order for an action to be free, the causal explanation for why that action occurred must end, ultimately, in the agentthe personwho performed that action. Agents are the ultimate cause of free actions; thats why there are alternate possibilities.

But if determinism is true, not only are there no alternate possibilities, but agents are not the ultimate cause of their actions. The causal explanation of peoples action traces back all the way to the motion of atoms at the beginning of the universe.

This is a transcript from the video series Sci-Phi: Science Fiction as Philosophy. Watch it now, on The Great Courses Plus.

Technically speaking, the Merovingian is wrong. The universe is not a deterministic system. Quantum mechanics has taught us that determinism is false. On the quantum level, individual events happen randomly and without a cause all the time. And to be clear, its not merely that we have so far been unable to predict such events or find their cause. We have actually proved, experimentally, that they have no cause.

Unfortunately, the randomness of quantum events cannot rescue human free will. For one, as philosopher Peter van Inwagen points out, indeterminism is just as incompatible with free will as determinism.

Learn more about the philosophical conundrum of free will and determinism.

Even if our decisions are the consequence of random quantum events in our brain, then we still arent free because we arent the cause of those events. We cant be. Nothing is the cause of those events. Indeed, their randomness entails that they are not caused.

Secondly, determinism is still true in a different way. Quantum randomness, which occurs on the micro-level, is essentially averaged out on the macro-level of larger objects. For example, the decay of individual radioactive atoms is random, but if you have a collection of them, you can deterministically predict when half of them will decay.

The statistical notion of adequate determinism can be used to predict the behavior of larger physical systems despite quantum behavior inside them. Since the brain is such a system, even though it may be impossible to predict specific quantum events within it, the outcome of the brains activity is likely deterministic. We may even one day have laws that enable us to predict its behavior.

All of this clearly makes it difficult to defend the notion that humans are free in the libertarian sense. Consequently, some philosophers have suggested an alternate theory of what it means to be free, known as compatibilism.

As the name suggests, these philosophers believe that free will and determinism are compatible. This idea dates all the way back to Aristotle and is defended by modern-day philosophers like John Martin Fischer.

Learn more about Aristotle and the Socratic legacy.

The essence of the suggestion is that an agent freely performs an action as long as that action flows or follows from some part of the agent. To modify Fischers argument, which was originally about moral responsibility, we might say that an agents action is free as long as it is the result of a conscious rational deliberative process.

If the agent thinks about what to do, and then the outcome of that process causes the agents action, then the agent has acted freely. The problem with this understanding of free will is that it doesnt align with our intuitions about what free will is.

According to the theory, as long as you are acting in accordance with the consequence of your rational deliberation, then you are acting freelyeven if outside forces are what ultimately caused that rational deliberation to occur as it did.

Philosophers who endorse the libertarian notion of free will are usually called agent causation theorists. According to this theory, for an action to be free, the causal explanation for why that action occurred must end, ultimately, in the agentthe personwho performed that action. Agents are the ultimate cause of free actions; thats why there are alternate possibilities.

On the quantum level, individual events happen randomly and without a cause, all the time. But the randomness of quantum events cannot rescue human free will. Indeterminism is just as incompatible with free will as determinism is. Even if our decisions are the result of random quantum events in our brain, we still arent free because we arent the cause of those events.

Compatibilism suggests that free will and determinism are compatible. The essence of the suggestion is that an agent freely performs an action as long as that action flows or follows from some part of the agent.

Read more:
'The Matrix' Universe and the Fight to Reclaim Free Will - The Great Courses Daily News

What’s on the March 20 ballot? Baton Rouge residents will vote on these congressional, local races – The Advocate

The March 20 election is here.

Baton Rouge area residents will head to the polls to vote on a number of local elections and a pair of special elections for seats in the U.S. House.

Polling places will be open from 8:30 a.m.-6 p.m. Anyone who is in line at 6 p.m. will be allowed to vote.

Voters are asked to bring an ID with them to vote. Voters without an ID will be allowed to vote after filling out an affidavit.

Voters are assigned to a specific voting precinct. You can look up your location at the Secretary of State's website byclicking here.

Once you enter your information, click 'My Election Day Voting Location.'

Visit geauxvote.com for more information on candidates.

Party abbreviations: D-Democrat, R-Republican, I-Independent; L-Libertarian; NP-No Party.

(Portions of Ascension, Assumption, East Baton Rouge, Iberville, St. James and West Baton Rouge parishes, plus the New Orleans area)

Chelsea Ardoin, R

Belden Noonie Man Batiste, I

Claston Bernard, R

Troy A. Carter, D

Karen Carter Peterson, D

Gary Chambers Jr., D

Harold John, D

J. Christopher Johnson, D

Brandon Jolicoeur, NP

Lloyd M. Kelly, D

Greg Lirette, R

Mindy McConnell, Libertarian

Desiree Ontiveros, D

Jenette M. Porter, D

Sheldon C. Vincent Sr., R

(Portions of East Feliciana, St. Helena, Tangipahoa and West Feliciana parishes, plus northeastern Louisiana)

Sandra Candy Christophe, D

Chad Conerly, R

Jim Davis, NP

Allen Guillory, R

Robert Lansden, R

Julia Letlow, R

Jaycee Magnuson, R

Horace Melton III, R

M.V. Vinny Mendoza, I

Richard H. Pannell, R

Sancha Smith, R

Errol Victor Sr., R

(5 to be elected)

Randy Anny, D

Wanda LeBlanc Bourgeois, R

Chad Domingue, R

Darnell Gilbert Sr., D

Duane Humphrey, D

Patti Melancon Poche, D

Tim Lazaroe, R

Wayne Messina, R

(5 to be elected)

Tracy Bryson, R

James Jimmy Fabre, NP

Gregory Hill, NP

Roy Miller, R

Ronald Marty Starkey, R

Hunter Stoetzner, R

(2 to be elected)

Elda Hootie Carter, NP

Kolby Frederick, R

Carlton Haycook, R

Read the rest here:
What's on the March 20 ballot? Baton Rouge residents will vote on these congressional, local races - The Advocate

Libertarian Party of Jennings County formed – The Republic

JENNINGS COUNTY The Libertarian Party of Jennings County became a recognized political organization, as an affiliate of the Libertarian Party of Indiana (LPI), on Feb. 20.

The Libertarian Party is based on the premise that you know best how to run your own life, said county resident Kevin Coryell, who helped organize the local party and now serves as county chairman.

At the national level, the Libertarian Party was founded in Colorado in 1971 as a political organization standing against government intrusion and for the preservation of civil liberties.

The party is now the third-largest political party in the U.S., with official party organizations in all 50 states. The LPI was founded in Indianapolis on July 14, 1974.

Since its founding, the Hoosier branch of Libertarians has actively fought against property tax laws, the governmental encroachment of imminent domain protections, the restrictive licensing of businesses and election fraud.

While the party has been allowed to sponsor candidates on election ballots in all of Indianas 92 counties since 1994, not every county has a local organization.

We are growing fast now, and we are not going to slow down until we have the LPI in every county, said LPI State Chairman and Development Director Evan McMahon.

According to McMahon, 25 Indiana counties already have certified LPI affiliations, with 19 additional counties in process and 10 more counties ready to begin the process.

I feel the political angst the nation has experienced during the last several years is increasing our numbers because of what we stand for, and what we have always have stood for, McMahon said. I am fanatical about it because I believe in my country, and the moral and ethical rights my country protects. I do not want to live under someone elses boot and I dont want to see my neighbor live under someones boot either.

During the 2020 primary election, Jennings County saw a large number of residents vote for Libertarian gubernatorial candidate Donald Rainwater. Rainwater pulled in 22% of Jennings Countys votes for governor to Republican Eric Holcombs 62% and Democrat Woody Myers 15.9%.

On March 1, three candidates during the Vernon election ran as Libertarians, but none of the individuals won seats. Leading up to the election, Rainwater and other members of the LPI said they met with voters in Jennings County.

Id say we had about 150 people actively involved or at least interested in establishing the Libertarian Party in Jennings County, Coryell said. I say we have big Ls and little ls, and both are welcome. The big Ls pay dues and are really interested in getting things going. The little ls are interested, but maybe not so ready to commit.

According to State Libertarian Party of Indiana Chairman Michael Madden there are

plans to have LPI candidates run for 138 local, state and federal offices by 2024 Elections.

Coryell added that anyone interested in learning more about the Libertarian Party in Jennings County are encouraged to come to the next public meeting at the Jennings County Public Library on April 17 from 12:30 to 2:30 p.m.

More here:
Libertarian Party of Jennings County formed - The Republic

Local View: Long-term spending problem won’t be solved by short-term politicians – Duluth News Tribune

Although economists debate how serious this is for the short term, all are in agreement that this level of spending is not sustainable. We will reach a point where continued deficit spending with rising interest payments on debt will begin to drag our economy down.

Ironically, it is the insatiable thirst of the American voter for social programs that created this problem. And it is that thirst that will result in their loss.

Congress spends money in three areas: mandatory spending (primarily Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and unemployment), interest on the national debt, and discretionary spending (the annual budget Congress and the president work out for defense, homeland security, health, education, and all the other branches and departments of government.

Mandatory spending consumes the greatest amount of federal revenue (what the government makes from taxes). Federal revenue typically runs around $3.5 trillion a year. Since the advent of Obamacare, mandatory spending now requires about $2.6 trillion, or about 75% of the federal revenue.

Growing interest on the national debt requires Congress to allocate $350 billion, or about 10% of federal revenue. After allocating money for mandatory spending and interest on our debt, Congress is left with only 15%, or $525 billion, of all federal revenue for discretionary spending.

That $525 billion is not sufficient to pay for defense, schools and education, homeland security, and running all of our government agencies. Thus, to keep our country safe and operational we have to run a deficit. A large deficit.

The large number of social programs under mandatory spending is dragging down our countrys financial health. Congress and the president, politicians put into office by the American voters, have elected not to address the problem. The reason is simple. This is a long-term problem, and politicians are in for the short term.

President Barack Obama gave the American people the Affordable Care Act by borrowing on Americas future. In return, he got a nearly $12 million mansion in Marthas Vineyard. For the short term, it was a win-win for all. In the long term, Obama will still have his mansion.

The American voter, in general, is poorly educated to understand fiscal policy. Americans rank in the lower 15% of the 35 leading economic countries in math. We have little understanding of economics and lack fundamental knowledge of how our government works. Americans are poorly qualified to recognize a leader. They vote for those who say they will give them what they want. It is a pitfall of democracy when dealing with an uneducated public that votes.

So how do we fix our current financial situation? Cut benefits? That would be political suicide. Raise taxes? Based on evidence, Americans are taxed out. Obamas tax increase to pay for the Affordable Care Act did little to raise revenue.

President Donald Trumps tax cut actually had the end result of raising revenue. It created a booming economy with the lowest unemployment in history. More people working meant more tax money coming in.

But even that added revenue was not sufficient to pay for all of our social programs.

The answer lies in education. Unfortunately, the two major parties are not interested in an educated public. They have done quite well getting elected by the uneducated. In fact, the Democrats have made it policy to register as many uneducated people as possible to vote. San Francisco even attempted to give those 16 years of age the right to vote.

So, it is left to the Libertarian Party. It is the Libertarians task to educate the American voter.

Dave Crockett of Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, owns engineering firms in Arizona and Michigan; is politically active; and is currently on sabbatical, working at Cirrus Aircraft in Duluth.

See the rest here:
Local View: Long-term spending problem won't be solved by short-term politicians - Duluth News Tribune