Mediaboss Marketing

Ive stumbled upon the formula that liberals based primarily in New York City use to attack those that go against their narrative. I want to discuss their methods and suggest a possible counterattack.

Their attack begins with a low-level staff writer, often a woman, on one of the many blogs that are primary headquartered in NYC, such as Gawker, Huffington Post, Buzzfeed, Atlantic, Salon, Slate, and Wonkette. She writes about the latest man who is a misogynist, racist, or bigot of some sort. Even though all the sites I mentioned are owned by different entities, the hate piece quickly cascades through their network, often within a day. This is no surprise when you consider that staff members at all these sites know each other in real life and have both friendly and sexual relations. Or perhaps they are just lazy and rather copy/paste a news item that someone else wrote instead of finding an original story themselves.

The articles, full of snark and liberal talking points, greatly anger their liberal audience. Now, understand that todays liberal doesnt attack through the courts or policethey go after a mans livelihood using the internet. The articles all contain the victims employment, sometimes even contact information of his boss or CEO (if the victim owns his own company, they will list his advertisers or customers). They are sure to include the source of the victims income.

All those angry readers now channel their anger on Twitter. They form a huge bot army that engages the victims source of income through a deluge of angry tweets, along the lines of Did you know that you employ a man who does so and so? No company can withstand this type of negative publicity, so within a day or two, the victim in question loses his employment. Because all of the sites have huge audiences, the bot army is quite large and impressive.

Their attack depends on four factors:

Their system is quite effective at reaching the desired end, but like all systems, there is a weakness. Can you spot it?

The weakness lies in the original writer of the hit piece. Once the story goes viral, she is often forgotten, but its her where the counterattack can be successfully executed. There really is no point engaging the bot army because their numbers are more than 10,000 times ours. Any attempt to fight them on Twitter will result in defeat, especially when you consider that they have tons of soldiers with over 50,000 followers (I have less than 6,000).

There is also no point in attacking companies like Gawker, who earn millions of dollars a year and can withstand any criticism we throw at them. But the blogger making $30,000 a year, trying to eke out a living in New York City, with hopes of climbing up the career ladder once its clear shes not talented enough to be a real writer, is very vulnerable to being even slightly attacked. Anything that damages her future employment chances will cause her grief, pain, and a decrease in income.

Twitter is a medium that is short and fleeting. Unless we can raise a huge rage army at short notice, which we cant, there is little point using this medium to fight back. But there is a medium which lasts forever, and where numbers dont matter as much. That medium is Google.

I have been successfully destroyed on Google. My name is linked to all sorts of negative material that ensures I will never get a corporate job again in my life. Thats fine with me since I make my living via other means, but thats not fine for blog writers who still need to depend on corporate America. Little Susie is writing for Jezebel today, but she will have to change jobs at some point, meaning a Human Resources airheadwill search for her name to make sure she is a proper fit for the company. What would be HRs reaction if they google their promising applicant and find this?

They wouldnt hire her. Unless shes applying for a position at Jezebel, no respectable company will touch a toxic individual who has been linked to racism. They dont want anyone who may cause controversy for them, and behind rape, nothing says controversy like race. If you dig into these writers work and background, you can easily find cases where they spew anti-white or misandrist views. All thats left is getting that on the first page of Google.

Its a slow-burn attack that will effectively punish these writers and scare their co-workers, whose income is low enough that they need to depend on corporate employment indefinitely, unless one day they get an original thought and can stay away from their iPhone long enough to write a book. It wont work on the big liberal writers like Jessica Valenti or Naomi Wolf, since any attention they get just helps them sell more books, but it does work on the young girl out of college trying to win feminist brownie points by denouncing a man for being creepy based on a bad joke.

If youre still skeptical on whether this will work, simply take a look at Nitasha Tiku, whose anti-white racism I highlighted recently. Within half a day, that post shot to the first page of Google when searching for her name. Whereas one day before Nitasha was gleefully retweeting my hate against her to rally her supporters, the following day she went completely silent. When one of her NYC media friends posted a link to my article, she took only 8 minutes tobeg him to take it down(like an obedient puppy dog, he did).

Does that sound like a girl who doesnt care what anyone says about her? One thing she was wrong about is that the traffic doesnt matterits about page rank. The more people that link to it or retweet it, the higher it will go in a Google result for her name. And this will stay thereforever. She can easily dodge any Twitter attack we send her, but she cant run from Google. No one can.

Not long ago, Buzzfeed insinuated I was a rapist. If I was a lowly staff writer who had to stroke Nick Dentons gay balls every day, Id shake in my boots. Id never get hired in a corporation again. But it actually had four benefits for me:

An attack that would devastate a person like Nitasha put money in my pocket. The reason they dont go after me anymore, even though all of them read me, is because they know that even mentioning me makes me stronger. I lost count how many times it happened where one of them tweeted me (usually a hack from The Atlantic), but then deleted the tweet not an hour later. I am on some type of blacklist, and to me thats fine, because I have enough seed traffic to create agitation in their gender-neutral souls. I also have the power to shoot anyones name to at least the second page of Google within a day. And theres not a damn thing they can do about it.

I scared Nitasha with almost no workit was just one blog post. Now imagine if there was just minor coordination within this part of the masculine sphere to attack one lowly staff writer who can barely make rent the following month. What if the first page of Google has several hits highlighting her anti-white or anti-male behavior? How many sleepless nights do you think she will have? A lot, and do you know how I know? Because several years ago I had those same sleepless nights.

Having your name destroyed on Google is the internet version of getting raped. I know this will hurt them because it hurt me, as right now Im stuck in some backwater European city, waking up at noon every day, banging thin women who bake me cakes and wear heels like theyre sneakers. At the same time I make love to foreign women without condoms, I have immunity from liberal attacks, and have decided to use this immunity for the good of men from my birth country. Its as if I have been blessed with a superpower.

There will be another Pax in the near future. All we have to do is follow these steps:

Our attack is slower and doesnt have the explosiveness of their Twitter bot army, but it works. In time, we will have our own bot army, but until then, Google is the equalizer that will put the brakes on their hatred of men and traditional masculinity. They have money, they have dozens of high-profile sites, and they have millions of readers, but we have the first page of the most popular search engine in the world.

Previously:Are Nitasha Tiku & Anil Dash Racist Against White Men?

More:
How To Defeat New York City Media Liberals Return Of Kings

No, dont go anywhere.

We need to talk. Ill keep it brief.

Below is a fake news article I wrote around six years ago as a joke, trying to show a friend how easy it is to come up with an article that looks plausible and officialAt the bottom of the page, there is a message saying that this is bullshit, clearly and blatantly, just to make sure nobody took this seriously.

And yet, despite this article being the most poorly written piece of shit and probably the worst joke I have ever made, it has been taken so seriously that I have 256 comments awaitingapproval, snopes has had to debunk it by noting the last paragraph, and Ive had NUMEROUS cases of people sending this link to me as an argument.

This is a microcosm ofa very serious problem.

We have a serious problem with fake newsin this country, and if you have come across this page, you probably googled something to the effect of IQ and political views.

Please, stop.If you keep googling things like this, youre going to find what youre looking for. Youre going to find one of those fake/fictitious news websites run by think tanks or fringe political groups, and youre going to read what you want to hear.

Except, next time, you wont come across this message. You wont come across the disclaimer at the bottom saying this bullshit.

Because while I was just a kid trying to make a point, the other news sources are not. They are political groups who want more than anything to tell you what you want to hear and gull you to join their ranks.

You need to do better. You need to check sources, you need to confirm what people are saying is true, even when you agree with them.

Especially when you agree with them.

If you believe what people say because they look like theyre telling the truth, because you agree with them and you assume that they know what theyre talking about, then you are going to be brainwashed, you are going to be gulled, you are going to be fooled. Theyll lie to you more and more.

Save yourself, and help save everyone else from this epidemic. Dont get gulled. Dont become some liars follower.

Check sources, especially when you want the story to be right. If you see something you agree with, dont be a fool and nod your head then move on like so many have with this page.

Stop, look at the source, follow the numbers, read some abstracts, figure out how they came to that conclusion and why. That way, if what someone says is true, you wont just think its true, youll know its true. And if its not, you will have discovered a liar, and no matter how much you wish what they said were true, call them out because the only thing worse than ignorance is willful ignorance.

Ask questions, think critically. We do not want a future run by liars and their followers.

Thats all.

And now, back to this.

A new study conducted at Harvard University shows that in America, Liberals have a significantly lower IQ than Conservatives. The study was conducted on 100,000 registered voters in 40 different states over the last twelve years, and has concluded its results.The first part of the study lists the correlation between political beliefs and intelligence. Subjects of the study were chosen at random and requested to come to an unmarked van to take a test and answer some questions for a reasonable amount of money.Of the 100,000 people, there were people from many doctrines, from conservative to liberal to marxist to fascist. Socialists came out on bottom, with an average IQ of 87. The second worst were Liberals and then Marxists, with 88 and 89 respectively. Conservatives received an average score of 110, which is significantly above average. However, the conservatives did not score the highest. The holder of second place were Communists with an average I.Q of 115, and the first place was apolitical people who did not follow any specific doctrine, who received a whopping score on average of 135.

IAHYM News attempted to interview President Barack Obama on the new find, but he refused to speak directly. Instead, while walking down the strange hallway, he told correspondent Joseph Ducreux that the studywas ridiculous and false, but failed to provide any reason as to why or how the science of the study is at fault.

Hilary Rodham Clinton was also contacted, but she immediately hung upthe phone when she figured out that the study was being mentioned at all.

Other parts of the study included the daily activities of the various people based on their doctrines. Apparently, Liberals are five times more likely to commit a crime, steal or cheat on a test than anybody else except for Socialists, 52% of which have committed a major felony while being watched. Conservatives not only did not commit any crimes, but they actually prevented them, as the few events where a Conservative was threatened by a thief or mugger was hindered by a concealed handgun. Also, Communists are the most likely to commit rape or sexual assault, second to socialists.

The study was conducted in other countries as well, where 81% of Muslim Extremists admitted to following the Liberal doctrine and idolizing President Barack Obama. The study was conducted by a group of roughly 900 different scientists across the country over the past twelve years, each one taking on a little over a hundred people per person.

Reporting from New York City, this is John Bowling. IAHYM News Network, 2011

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

..

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Oh yeah, and everything in that bullshit you just read is completely and totally false. There has been no such conclusive study, and all of the Finds are based on public paranoia.If you, even for a second, thought this find might be true, you are probably an idiot.

Like Loading...

Original post:
New Study shows Liberals have a lower average IQ than ...

Posted September 3, 2015

Heres a new, not so nice tax called the Estate Administration Tax (EAT) that the Wynne Liberals slipped through effective Jan. 1, 2015 and no one is talking about it!

Basically, your survivors and executors have to report the value of all your stuff, valuables, cars and trucks, second homes, boats, RVs, right down to the exercise bicycle in the basement.

It is yet another roadblock to discourage real growth in Ontario joining the other job killers and evaporating prosperity. Here are some examples of how the Ontario Liberals have mismanaged the Ontario economy: We have the most expensive electricity rates in North America; a new job- killing Ontario pension plan; the most expensive alcoholic beverages in North America; sky high gasoline taxes; supply management agriculture boards that have driven basic food prices to excessive levels; an integrated sales tax of 13 per cent on all goods and services with minor exceptions.

Yes the province even charges the HST on the cost of your funeral.

The province charges the HST on the electricity you use.

The HST is charged on a number of consumables including vehicles, non-prescription drugs, clothing, and items that most people would describe a food or a derivative.

When does the premier stop her relentless quest to bail out a province she and her predecessor created that is now carrying an $8 billion deficit? Her finance minister claims the Ontario budget will be balanced by 2017.

That runs counter to what her federal Liberal leader is saying. He wants to remove the Harper governments balanced budget legislation and go to deficit financing to fix the countrys infrastructure.

These two leaders who are currently working together to elect federal Liberals in Ontario, but dont seem to be playing from the same page.

For all the details of this new tax grab, go to the link below where the government explains it or you can read the comments from funeral directors printed out below in laymans terms, or both. But be forewarned, its scary stuff.

http://www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/tax/eat/

Our Wynne Liberal Governmentpresumably has to find a way to repay the billion dollars they gave the construction companies not to build the gas-fired hydro plants and subsidizing wind/solar power projects, the Orange air ambulance fiasco, the E-health record keeping program that cost millions, and other boondoggles they created. The aptly named EAT even has local Funeral Directors seeing red.

Heres the skinny of Kathleen Wynnes latest play to extract more money from taxpayers, even after theyre dead.

The current EAT tax rates

Note: There is no estate administration tax payable if the value of the estate is $1,000 or less.

The estate administration tax is calculated on the total value of the estate. For example, for an estate valued at $240,000 the tax would be calculated as follows:

In order to comply with this new death tax, the estate appointed representatives are forced to consult with the following professionals: Financial advisor, registered appraiser, lawyer, funeral director, insurance broker, the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, the estate banker. Most of who charge a fee for service in preparing the Estate Administration Tax returns. Those fees along, depending on the size of the estate, could run into the thousands.

Yes, and the return, when filed, must be accompanied with payment in full.

Licensed Funeral Directors Tim Baragar and Jeff Neuman are sounding the alarm bells over a tax program that they say will make life difficult for estate representatives in Ontario. Baragar makes it clear that his service does not end at the cemetery.

He and Jeff Neuman do their best to help families obtain pertinent documents and ensure that a loved ones affairs are in order.

Sounding the Alarm

And thats why Baragar and Neuman are sounding the alarm bells over the newly changed tax that took effect on Jan. 1. Its timelines and penalties are something these Funeral Directors think everyone needs to be aware of.

The newly changed tax program that Baragar finds frightening requires an executor to assess, appraise and value any and all property owned at the time of death on a tight timeline. This EAT appraisal includes anything that is not passed directly to a spouse or passed through joint ownership. Assets that are being gifted to charities also need to be included in the valuation. The tax is then calculated and needs to be paid immediately to the Province of Ontario as a deposit.

Baragar explains it this way when a loved one dies and you are named as the executor of the estate, you apply for a Certificate of Appointment of Estate Trustee and then you have only 90 days to file your Estate Information Return. As soon as you file you have to pay the tax as a deposit. And if you dont file, there are serious consequences.

According to the Ministry of Finance, estate representatives who fail to file an Estate Information return as required, or who make false or misleading statements on the return, may be found guilty of an offense and, on conviction, are liable to a fine of at least $1,000 and up to twice the tax payable by the estate or, imprisonment of not more than two years or both.

Has Ontario become a police state?

This is concerning to Baragar. It is completely unreasonable for the Ministry of Finance to expect this reporting within 90 days of the trustee beginning their role, Baragar says. Just getting print outs and information from banks and investment companies takes a lot of time. My biggest concern is that quite typically the trustees are often family members or close friends of the person who has died. So this simply isnt a matter of completing a task that the Ministry of Finance merely views as a new source of income, it is a very emotionally demanding and time-consuming job. Couple that with the added stress of dealing with the loss as a family member or close friend, and it can make this role very upsetting and emotionally draining.

And to be clear the valuation cant be a guess. The Province requires that you be able to back-up what youre filing so if youre not sure what the current market value is of a home, for example, its up to the executor to hire someone to do an appraisal. There is even a link on the Ministrys website to the Appraisal Institute of Canada.

And once you appraise, value and file you still have to be sure that nothing changes. If you made a mistake or if you missed something you have to immediately contact the Ministry (within 30 calendar days) and make all the necessary corrections.

For our Government to threaten these individuals with charges and penalties is absurd, Baragar says. We pay tax when we earn our living. We pay tax when it generates income within an investment. We pay tax when we pull it from that investment, so this same money certainly shouldnt be taxed again within the boundaries of someones estate.

Enough is enough.

Like Loading...

Related

Continued here:
Ontario Liberals now tax your stuff after you die | Guelph ...

Its been a sad week to be a liberal, again. Nothing seems to be going right for our betters and aspiring masters. America continues to prosper, to their dismay. Their conspiracy theories are turning into borscht. Donald Trump is breaking their collective collectivist spirit. They cant even manage to effectively blame conservatives for things conservatives didnt do.

Bathe in their tears. The salty goodness of their sob juice will add a radiant glow to your skin and put a spring in your step.

People are digging the tax bill, which is weird since it killed all of those who survived the mass extinction that followed Trumps withdrawal from the Paris Climate Grift. The stock market bump has largely stopped bumping. Remember the other week when the savvy market players at MSNBC were hoping that Paul Krugmans stock tips were finally going to pay off? Yeah, not so much. There is nothing that liberals hate more than the inevitable prosperity that follows the inauguration of a truly conservative administration.

But what about George W. Bush!?!?!?!?

Like I said, the inevitable prosperity that follows the inauguration of a truly conservative administration.

The Democrats tiptoed through the tulips into the kill zone of Donald Trumps immigration ambush and still probably think they won even as their fantasies of a dozen million new Democrats lies there, a pile of smoldering rubble. Trump played it as we hoped he never really wanted to give the amnesty he offered, but he offered enough to build up the dreams of the Dreamers knowing that the Democrats would crush those dreams under their Birkenstocks. See, if the Democrats had gone for Trumps proposal and imposed real border security, not only would that have turned off the Fresh Democrat Voter spigot but would have left them with zip to pretend to trade for amnesty for the big score, the other 10 million plus illegal aliens who have invaded our country. But now the Democrats have nothing, and Trump is tweeting to Dreamers accurately that the Democrats betrayed them because all the Democrats really care about is replacing the current electorate with a more bueno one.

Democrats, why do you hate Dreamers dreams?

The liberals were also sad about how they cant blame the recent shooting on conservatives at least not honestly. How many outright false stories did their Democrat transcriptionists in the mainstream media have to correct as they desperately tried to tie this murderer to patriotic conservatives? Its got to be deeply disappointing when, time after time, the killers stubbornly refuse to be conservative, observant Christian or Jewish NRA members. Instead, Jackie Earle Haleys mutant doppelgnger cultivates the kind of anti-Semitic, race-obsessed weirdness that would have made him fit right in on any liberal college campus.

The liberals lies no longer work, and they are realizing it. Too bad they got nothing else. They demand more power for the government, yet in seemingly every one of these cases it turns out the government has totally dropped the ball. Perhaps tracking down a guy who babbles online about shooting up a school cuts into their on-the-job sexting action. Better give the bureaucrats who screwed-up this and multiple other cases even more power, and take rights away from the citizens who didnt do anything wrong becauseuhwell, uh, you must like mass murder if you dare ask questions like that!

Nope, not an effective argument. And the liberals seem to know it. They are just going through the motions with their reflexive claims that the Normals who had nothing to do with this atrocity are to blame. Whether you are some stand-up comic tweets about how Normals blood on your hands because a dirtbag mutant a continent away committed a crime after the FBI shrugged, or a millennial doofus who writes for Vox trying to explain Heller without stating its basic holding, it just doesnt work anymore. Nor do tweets about how awful it is that Trump is smiling with the heroes from that awful day it must means he likes school shootings, I guess. Seems legit. Whatever.

The left is shooting intellectual and rhetorical blanks, because now were wait for it woke. We see the truth. No one who wants us to give up our guns does so because they want us to be more able to defend ourselves from crime or tyranny. Their agenda is clear, no matter how much they lie and deny.

Disarmament is key to converting us from citizens to subjects, and were just not playing that game. So they mutter about the NRA which you need to join if you dig freedom and we keep buying guns and ammunition to create the facts on the ground that will ensure their long-sought after end state of another Venezuela will never happen here.

And for the folks who forgot about that whole American Revolution thing, and are unfamiliar with the insurgencies in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan, heres a look at the power of armed citizens with small arms and how they can absolutely fight and win against would-be dictators in the modern world.

Then theres their pivot to the latest bimbo trying to use an alleged ancient fling with the president to get some attention. The liberals once again got all aroused by the idea that this would do him in with his fans: Well, your so-called president got with a Playboy Playmate and also a porn star and also a Slovenian super model and..andwait

Yeah, thatll totally take out Trump. Well turn on him because he allegedly scored with too many hot women.

You know, we kept warning them how they would hate the new rules, and now they so do. You normalize Oval Office trysts with chubby cigar aficionados and then when you start whining because a then-playboy canoodles with a then-Playboy Playmate, and youre stunned that instead of us hanging our heads we start offering high-fives?

We dont care. Thats the new rule. Learn it. Know it. Live it.

And then theres Robert Mueller and his agonized admission that no American citizens were willingly involved with Russian meddling in the election. Note the word is now meddling. They dont use the word collusion anymore since Mueller admitted that there was no collusion which is what weve been saying for over a year in response to Team Felonia Milhous von Pantsuits pathetic attempt to explain away her humiliating defeat at the hands of patriotic Americans.

Instead of frog-marching the whole of Trump World out of the West Wing for partying with Putin, Muellers festival of liberal onanism has instead resulted in indictments of a bunch of trolls who remain safely out-of-reach in Vladivostok, the better to avoid the feds being humiliated in court like they were by Cliven Bundy. But hey they were going for Trump and instead got the mastermind manipulators behind 13 follower accounts such as @MAGATrumpMAGAGuy and @BernieSuperFan72, so thats almost as good.

Collusions fades to meddling which fades to random tweeting which fades to framed victim of liberal machinations Mike Flynn either withdrawing his coerced guilty pleas or getting a presidential pardon based on the tidal wave of recent revelations of wrongdoing swirling about his railroading. Either one works.

Yeah, its been a sad week to be a liberal, again. Good.

See the original post:
Liberals Fail, Volume XXXVII - Kurt Schlichter

United We Dream executive director Cristina Jimnez, whose group has mobilized its grass roots to push for Dreamer protection, tweeted that "Dems failed to fight & use their leverage to protect immigrant youth." | Reed Saxon/AP Photo

Activist groups were angry at how the negotiations turned out, with some calling it '#SchumerSellout.'

By ELANA SCHOR

01/22/2018 02:09 PM EST

Updated 01/22/2018 04:21 PM EST

Liberal activists are furious with Democratic senators after most of them agreed to reopen the federal government without a firm path to shielding young immigrants from deportation.

As the third day of the shutdown dawned, liberal advocates and immigration groups fired off a joint statement blasting as unacceptable Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnells offer merely to hold a vote on immigration with no promises for action from the House or White House in exchange for Democratic votes to reopen the government. But three hours later, Democratic senators agreed to just those terms sparking anger on the left.

Story Continued Below

Millions of people flooded the streets of every major American city to stand up to Trump this weekend, tweeted Leah Greenberg, co-executive director of the influential activist network Indivisible. Your constituents want you to fight. How can you possibly not understand that?

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on Monday argued Democrats secured critical assurance for Dreamers, who are at risk for deportation as soon as March after President Donald Trumps decision to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

Sign up for POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news, every morning in your inbox.

By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time.

We have a way to address the fate of the Dreamers, starting right now instead of waiting until March, Schumer said on the floor.

But activist groups that have provided his caucus crucial firepower during fights against GOP health care and tax bills were not buying that explanation.

Murshed Zaheed, political director of the liberal group CREDO Action, said Democrats decision shows Schumers willingness to betray progressives.

Call it the #SchumerSellout, he said in an interview. Hashtagged.

Ben Wikler, Washington director of MoveOn.org, slammed McConnells offer to Democrats and lamented the minoritys splintering over protecting Dreamers.

Whats clear from todays joke deal is that the grass-roots movement demanding unity and courage has a lot of work to do to ensure that the whole Democratic Caucus is ready to fight when the time comes, he said in an interview.

United We Dream Executive Director Cristina Jimnez, whose group has mobilized its grass roots to push for Dreamer protection, tweeted that Dems failed to fight & use their leverage to protect immigrant youth. A false promise to vote on immigration from Rs is not a strategy to win. We wont be fooled. This vote means deportation.

Not every group on the left lambasted Senate Democrats on Monday.

Organizing for Action, an offshoot of the political organizing arm built by former President Barack Obama, attempted to keep the blame for the three-day shutdown on the GOP, even as it offered faint praise for the Senate agreement.

The good news for the American people is that the government shutdown a crisis needlessly manufactured by Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan, and the White House will soon be over, OFA spokesman Jesse Lehrich said in a statement. But lets be clear: This stopgap measure is not a solution. Its merely a band-aid for a self-inflicted wound that remains untreated.

Schumer spokesman Matt House urged all supporters of Dreamer aid to come together around securing the strongest possible showing for an immigration deal next month, when McConnell has vowed to move to a debate on the issue.

Lets take advantage of the renewed attention and sympathy for Dreamers, and focus on winning the vote 17 days from now, House wrote in an email.

House Democratic leaders are expected to vote against the Senates three-week government funding patch, which cleared a key procedural hurdle on an 81-18 vote. That opposition may ensure that the ire of activists remains trained on the upper chamber, where only 16 Democrats voted against advancing the stopgap bill.

Missing out on the latest scoops? Sign up for POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news, every morning in your inbox.

View post:
Liberals livid after deal to end shutdown - POLITICO