Archive for the ‘Illegal Immigration’ Category

DAVE NEESE’S PROVOCATIONS: Illegal immigration’s inconvenient truths – The Trentonian

If a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border is aterrible, horrible, awful, horrendous, despicable, loathsome, un-American idea, as some aresaying, then isnt it time to quit talking and take action?

Isnt it time to start dismantling the more than 650 miles of border barrier thats already there?

Thats right, more than 650 miles. Wall, fence, barrier. Already there.

Isnt a stretch of border barrier that actuallyexists at least as much an affront to humandecency as the mere idea of constructing morebarrier?

Advertisement

Six hundred fifty-plus miles, thats a pretty good stretch, wouldnt you say? Roughly equals the distance from Trenton to Indianapolis. Think ofthat. All the way across Pennsylvania. All the way across Ohio. Half way across Indiana.

The existing stretch includes over 600 milesof vehicular and pedestrian barriers, plus about 40 miles of double fencing.

Question: If the very idea of a border barrier is intolerable, shouldnt those who had a hand in approving the existing structures be held toaccount? Maybe, say, be tarred and feathered?

Or put in a public stock?

Careful. Trick question. If you answered yes, then you favor taking degrading punitivemeasures against such titans of enlightened policy as former President Barack Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. They voted in favor of a U.S.-Mexico border barrierwhen they were U.S. senators.

That was, of course, before a political strategy of all-out pandering to a Spanish-surnameconstituency became the Democratic Partys Plank Numero Uno.

While were busy dismantling the physicalbarriers erected by the Anglo occupation ofCalifornia, Texas, Arizona and New Mexico,shouldnt gringo Yanquis get to workdismantling the legal barriers theyve erected aswell?

Why have any borders at all? The idea hasappeal to both ends of the political spectrum.

Recall if you will the Wall Street Journals no-borders editorial crusade in the 1980s. Keep inmind that the Journal serves as the theologianof economics doctrine for the transnationalcorporate wing of the Republican Party. Thats the wing that salutes no national flag OldGlory included. In any event, the Journal championed a constitutional amendmentdeclaring simply: There shall be open borders.

In other words, there shall be cheap laborgalore, making it easier for capitals CEOs and CFOs to meet their net earnings projections.

Libertarians, too, find open-borders to be ahot-diggity notion. And over on the opposite end of the spectrum, meanwhile, rabble-rousingleftist pressure groups like La Raza likewisefavor a policy of laxly guarded, or unguarded,borders on the American side, almost asenthusiastically as the pro-business Chamberof Commerce does.

The idea of ignoring if not activelyencouraging illegal immigration would seem at a superficial glance to conflict with theDemocratic Partys labor union component and its ostensible advocacy for the toiling masses.

But take a closer look. The unions these daysare increasingly concerned with the public-employee sector of the toiling masses. And thissectors interests are dependent on legislative appropriations on political clout more than on the mysterious workings of free-enterprisemarket forces.

The long and the short of it is that for theDemocratic Party theres an over-riding benefit in leveraging a growing Latino-voting bloc intopolitical power.

To hear the media describe it, any measure toenforce immigration law, however feeble, isxenophobia run amok. To collar a criminal alien and deal with him as the law provides isregarded as spray-painting graffiti all over the Statue of Liberty.

In light of such views, what are we to make ofMexicos own harsh laws for dealing with anillegal gringo element on its side of the border?

As anyone can tell you who has ever ventured down into the Baja or across the borderelsewhere, the Policia Federal arent reluctant to pull you over and check your papers. (Andmaybe, on occasion, to coax you to cough up la coima.)

Point is, if youre visiting Mexico, youd betterhave papers showing you crossed the border legally.

Crossing the border illegally, south to north,into the United States is a mere civil infraction.

But crossing the border illegally going the otherway, into Mexico, is a full-blown criminal offense.

A criminal offense that can land you in one ofMexicos hell-hole prisons for two years. Up to10 years for a repeat offense. And given thenightmarish nature of Mexicos gang-run, corruption-lubricated detention facilities, eventwo months could be the equivalent of a deathsentence.

Oh, and there are no sanctuary cities south ofthe border. Sanctuary cities are strictly a Yanquiconcept. From San Francisco to Chicago toTrenton, Democrat-run municipal Waziristanshave proudly proclaimed themselvesaccommodating safe zones for illegals, er,undocumenteds. And the preening self-righteous of liberalism have taken to postingyard signs proclaiming, Hate has no home here.

Try telling that to Fidel Ruiz Serrano,Alejandro Castillo, Ruben Perez Rivera,Santiago Mario Garcia and other such names conspicuously adorning the top of the FBIs listof most wanted violent fugitives.

Try out your dewy-eyed no hate heremessage on the army-size criminal gangs the machete-wielding M-13 (estimated 70,000strong), the Latin Kings (estimated 100,000strong) todays huddled masses yearning to establish a few million dollars of producto coke, crank, weed in your neighborhood.

Those who favor loosely policed or even un-policed borders must steel themselves againstcertain other inconvenient realities.

Theres a blurry line distinguishing Mexicanpolice from the Sinaloa, the Juarez, the Tijuana and other crime cartels. Meanwhile, you need a roster to keep straight the Zetas, the Colima,the Sonara, the Guadalajara and other teamsof the Mexican bandito league. All havetentacles reaching into El Norte. Their standingproposition is: Whatll it be, amigo, plata oplomo? (Silver or lead? I.e., Which would youprefer to take? Bribes or bullets?)

There are 351,000 criminal aliens in U.S.

state and federal prisons. A GovernmentAccountability Office study found 2.9 millioncriminal alien offenses committed over a three-year survey period including 500,000 drug,213,000 assault, 94,000 weapons, 70,000 sex,42,000 robbery and 25,000 murder charges.

It does not logically follow that just becausePresident Trump is a blustery, narcissisticblabbermouth, therefore unguarded borders andunenforced immigration laws add up to a great idea. Thats a dingbats syllogism.

Trump elicited horrified gasps from the liberal bien pensants when he said the Latino border-jumpers include some bad hombres. But what term would better describe the 351,000 criminal aliens packing American jail cells already overflowing with home-grown bad-hombre Yanquis?

Yes, Latino criminal gangs no more defineLatinos than the Forty Thieves, the BoweryBoys, the Dead Rabbits or the Westies defined Irish Americans. Or than the Bonannos, the Gambinos or the Luccheses defined ItalianAmericans. But they were real menaces, too.

They might have been dealt with much soonerthan they belatedly were had there not been theobstacle of ethnic politics.

Those who prefer to wink at illegal immigrationalso must gloss over additional inconvenienttruths besides crime.

For example:

Illegal aliens tap into social-services andschool resources. Those resources arestretched thin especially in financially strapped cities. Nearly nine out of 10 border-jumper immigrants with children receive some form oftax-funded benefit, such as schooling and school lunches. The costs of emergency medicaltreatment must be squeezed out out of tapped-dry public funds. And even nearly a quarter ofillegal immigrants without children still manage to wangle some form of public benefit, according to the Center for Immigration Studies, which derives its percentages from U.S. Census data.

African Americans, especially black teenagers,

are likely paying most of the cost for illegalimmigration, paying it in the currency of lost jobs.

And African-Americans are also paying in thecurrency of eroded wages for unskilled jobs inthe under-$25,000 pay range. This according tothe research of Harvard economist GeorgeBorjas.

Other research economists report that fullythree-quarters (actually, 76 percent) of Mexican illegals coming north over the border have lessthan a high-school education. They compete forscarce jobs with Americas high-school dropoutsand undermine the already low pay on thebottom rungs of the workplace ladder.

Including 40 percent visa overstays, thereare now by official estimate 11 million illegal immigrants in the United States. Thats a number roughly equal to the population of Ohio. There are other credible estimates that put the numbermuch higher. In any event, accepting the lower figure of 11 million, thats nearly as manyimmigrants as entered the country legally through Ellis Island over the six decades of 1892-1954.

Mexican immigrants in this country send $25billion a year back home to Mexico, according to the U.S. Treasury Dept. Think of that as moneysiphoned out of the U.S. economy. Suchremittances now constitute a revenue sourcefor Mexico greater than its oil.

Perhaps not entirely unrelated to the topic ofremittances, a Mexican oligarch billionaire andtelecom monopolist Carlos Slim Helu is now the biggest stockholder of the New York Times,after rescuing the paper with a $250-million loan.

His telecom empire surely has reaped a tidy sum in fees extracted from the transmission of thoseremittances.

Meanwhile, the Gray Lady frets and fusses constantly over the social injustice, the hard-hearted cruelty, the Know-Nothing bigotry ofenforcing immigration laws which have been onthe books for decades. But this, of course, couldbe mere coincidence.

Sure it could.

davidneese@verizon.net

Here is the original post:
DAVE NEESE'S PROVOCATIONS: Illegal immigration's inconvenient truths - The Trentonian

What is the cost of illegal immigration? – The Commercial Appeal – The Commercial Appeal

Subscribe today for full access on your desktop, tablet, and mobile device.

25

Let friends in your social network know what you are reading about

In the May 3rd issue of The Commercial Appeal, Tonyaa Weathersbee's Who Loses if undocumented workers go? carefully avoids the terms Illegal and immigrant and prefers the euphemism.

Try Another

Audio CAPTCHA

Image CAPTCHA

Help

CancelSend

A link has been sent to your friend's email address.

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

The Commercial Appeal 6:05 a.m. CT May 6, 2017

Sun letters(Photo: The Jackson Sun)

In the May 3rd issue of The Commerical Appeal, Tonyaa Weathersbee's Who Loses if undocumented workers go? carefully avoids the terms Illegal and immigrant and prefers the euphemism.

Similarly, we just experienced A Day Without Immigrants.Another euphemism, since all Americans - except for Native Americans are either immigrants or children of immigrants.

ButWeathersbee does bring up an interesting question: What would a day without Undocumented (illegal) workers (immigrants) look like?

To answer that question, you first have to know how many live in the US. No one knows exactly because they are undocumented. However, Pew Research estimates there are roughly 11.1 million illegal immigrants living in the US, or 3.5% of America's population. This 3.5 percent commit 13.6 percent all crimes, 12 percent all murders and 16 percent all drug and human trafficking sentences.

Factor in the costs of services such as healthcare and education. According to The Federation for American Immigration reform, this amounts to $113 billion annually. Yet illegal immigrants only contribute $11.6 billion annually in taxes.

Add to that total something called Remittances money sent by illegal immigrants back to their homeland. Pew Research calculates that amount to be $26.72 billion each year money that simply evaporates yearly from the economy.

All totaled, A Day Without Illegal Immigrants would SAVE the US $351 million. The COST of a Day Without Immigrants would be incalculable. Ernest Seger, Germantown

Read or Share this story: http://memne.ws/2pglZ6v

0) { %>

0) { %>

See original here:
What is the cost of illegal immigration? - The Commercial Appeal - The Commercial Appeal

Maryland needs to get a grip on their statutory rape laws, including for illegal immigrants – Hot Air

posted at 10:01 am on May 6, 2017 by Jazz Shaw

You probably heard about the horrible and politically charged rape case out of Maryland which was reported back in March. Two immigrant students, at least one of whom was in the country illegally (the other claims to be on a special student program, but the details are unclear), were accused of luring a 14 year old girl into a school bathroom, sexually assaulting her, filming it and sending the video around. Many conservative outlets as well as the White House pointed to the case as yet another example of why we need to crack down on illegal immigration. (Which isnt really up for debate in any event we do need to.)

The Maryland case took a shocking turn this week, however, when Maryland authorities announced that most of the charges were being dropped and the story wasnt as it first seemed. (CBS Baltimore)

Montgomery County prosecutors made the bombshell decision to drop rape charges against two teenagers who are undocumented immigrants.

17-year-old Jose Montano and 18-year-old Henry Sanchez Milian came to the United States illegally through Central America just months before police alleged they sexually assaulted a 14-year-old classmate inside Rockville High School in March.

Montgomery County States Attorney John McCarthy says the facts in the case do not support the charges.

We have concluded that the facts in this case do not support the original charges filed in this matter, do to [sic] the lack of corroboration and substantial inconsistencies from the facts that we have obtained from multiple sources since the filing of the original charging document.

How the charges could suddenly be dropped was immediately both shocking and outrageous to me. It just didnt make sense. CNN covered the story further and included some comments from the prosecutor which simply flew in the face of reality. (Emphasis added)

Defense attorneys had said that the sexual encounter between the defendants and the 14-year-old girl was consensual.

There were no scratches, no bruises. There was no hitting, there was no screaming, there was no running immediately to some sort of security officer, Sanchez-Milians attorney Andrew Jezic said at the time.

Sanchez-Milian allegedly received sexually explicit images from the 17-year-old student also charged in the case.

Okay, so several of the key elements of the original allegations have clearly changed. Apparently the 14 year old girl wasnt physically forced into the stall and was, perhaps, actively participating in the sexual encounters. Also, according to this new information, she filmed the abuse herself and sent the video to the two assailants who then passed it around further. But none of this changes one underlying fact which nobody involved in the investigation seems to be mentioning. Its still rape, or at least it most certainly should be.

The age of consent in Maryland is 16 and at least until recently they didnt have any form of Romeo and Juliet law which provides exceptions for children engaged in sexual activity who are close to the same age. Unfortunately it looks like they later included a provision which states that a fourteen year old can give consent if the other person is within four years of her age. In this case the girl is fourteen and the two individuals who assaulted her were 17 and 18. At least one, if not both, are legally adults. This is statutory rape in concept if not by definition in Maryland, even if some states are bending the rules. Weve had an accepted premise in this country for some time now that the sex in a case like this could not have been consensual because a 14 year old child can not legally give meaningful consent.

Clearly something had already gone horribly wrong in that childs home if she found it to be an acceptable idea to engage in sexual activity with an adult male in a bathroom, to say nothing of filming the event and forwarding the file. But that doesnt make it her fault. Thats a shortcoming in the family and the community which does not excuse the behavior of either of the men who did this. But the media is somehow treating this story as a case of Trump being wrong about blaming illegal immigrants. Sending around child pornography (the rapists did forward the video even if they didnt record it themselves) is still a serious charge and its more than sufficient grounds to deport the illegal immigrant in question.

But even if leave aside all of the politics and immigration policy, its time for Maryland and other states to take a fresh look at their statutory rape laws. The exceptions I mentioned above were supposed to be designed so that high school sweethearts who are within a couple years of age and foolishly engage in adult sexual activity wouldnt wind up going to jail. I completely support those types of exceptions and feel that its up to the family to teach children right from wrong in such circumstances. But these two men were not this young girls boyfriends and if existing law allows for something like this to happen and see them walk free, the wheels have come off the legal cart.

Read the original:
Maryland needs to get a grip on their statutory rape laws, including for illegal immigrants - Hot Air

Illegal immigrant charged with trying to get NH driver’s license | New … – The Union Leader

NASHUA State Police said Friday an illegal immigrant claimed to be a resident and tried to obtain a New Hampshire drivers license in Nashua.

Shtain Gbalanga, 21, claimed Barrington as his legal residence when he went to the Division of Motor Vehicles substation in Nashua to get a license Friday.

An investigation by State Police with the assistance of federal officials revealed that Gbalanga was using fraudulent documents, and in fact was a French citizen in this country illegally.

Gbalanga was arrested without incident and brought to the Hillsborough County House of Corrections where he was being held on $5,000 cash bail.

He will be arraigned Monday in the 9th Circuit Court District Division in Nashua on misdemeanor charges of tampering with public records and unsworn falsification.

State Police officials said the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement along with the state Division of Motor Vehicles assisted in this investigation.

Anyone with further information about this matter is urged to contact Trooper First Class Richard H. Dupont Jr. at (603) 223-8969.

Excerpt from:
Illegal immigrant charged with trying to get NH driver's license | New ... - The Union Leader

DHS catches less than 1 percent of illegal immigrant ‘overstays’: Audit – Washington Times

Homeland Security has built up a backlog of more than 1.2 million illegal immigrants who it believes have overstayed visas but managed to arrest only about 3,400 of them, according to the most recent data, which works out to a rate of about 1 in every 350 lawbreakers.

That is far worse than the rate for those who crossed the border illegally, and it means criminals, people engaged in narcoterrorism and other national security risks are left to run free in the U.S., the Homeland Security inspector general said in a report Thursday.

Federal agents have trouble tracking down the criminals because the government still doesnt monitor departures, meaning it cant be certain whether those who came on tourist, business or student visas leave when they are supposed to.

Officers have to check as many as 27 in-house systems, in addition to state databases, to try to guess whether someone has left. Even then, they can make catastrophic mistakes when it wrongly appears that a visitor has left the country.

Such false departure information resulted in [deportation] officers closing visa overstay investigations of dangerous individuals, such as suspected criminals, who were actually still in the United States and could pose a threat to national security, the investigators said in the report. For example, an ERO officer stated that a suspect under investigation was listed as having left the country, but had given his ticket to a family member and was still residing in the United States.

Visa overstays, as they are called, have become an increasing focus of the immigration debate. As the flow of illegal border crossings declines, an increasing percentage of those in the country illegally are travelers who came on business, tourist or student visas but didnt leave when their time was up.

Several of the Sept. 11, 2001, hijackers were overstays.

Homeland Security has struggled to get a handle on the situation, or even to figure out how bad it is.

A report last year looking at just a portion of visas calculated that more than 500,000 visitors overstayed in 2015. The total backlog grew to more than 1.2 million, the inspector general said.

Meanwhile, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers arrested only 3,402 potential overstays in 2015.

In its official response, ICE said it is trying to do a better job of calculating the number of visa overstays.

President Trump has pushed the Homeland Security Department to finish the system that would track departures, and tests are being run at Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport in Atlanta.

The department also plans to release its next overstay report soon. That report will cover almost all visa categories, so the government will have a better sense for how bad the problem is.

But Rep. Bob Goodlatte, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said that until the government tracks all departures, it wont know whats going on.

Visa security is a matter of national security, and it is imperative that we know who is coming to our country and when they leave so that we protect American citizens and our interests, the Virginia Republican said.

Congress demanded a biometric entry-exit system more than 20 years ago, but administrations in both parties have failed to deliver, saying that airports arent configured to check departures and that the land ports of entry are an even bigger logistical hurdle.

Mr. Goodlatte said he expects Mr. Trumps focus on immigration to finally push Homeland Security to finish the job.

Until then, officers will waste time on bogus leads, the inspector generals report said. The data are so unreliable that officers and agents often end up finding an overstay still in the country who the systems said already had left, or spend time trying to track down someone who did leave the country or obtained legal status.

An ICE officer estimated that he spent more than 50 hours on a single suspect, only to find the individual had applied for [an immigration] benefit and should not have been categorized as an overstay, the audit said.

Read more here:
DHS catches less than 1 percent of illegal immigrant 'overstays': Audit - Washington Times