Archive for the ‘Hillary Clinton’ Category

‘As guarded as Fort Knox’: the inside story of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign – The Guardian

Shortly before midnight on 8 November 2016, Hillary Rodham Clinton dozed off in the bedroom of her Manhattan hotel. The presidential candidate was exhausted from the rigours of a bruising election campaign and rattled by a flurry of early results that suggested the verdict was far from a foregone conclusion. She closed her eyes as the slight favourite to become the USs first female president. She opened them to a nightmare and a world turned upside down.

Clintons shock loss to Donald Trump the embodiment of chaos to her bastion of control left so much destruction in its wake (a victory party mothballed, shell-shocked staffers out of work, 66m futile votes) that it was easy to overlook the small matter of 2,000 hours of behind-the-scenes campaign footage, shot in a spirit of cautious optimism but now left to languish. Clintons office suggested cobbling it together as an official record, an insiders account of what went wrong. Butfilm-maker Nanette Burstein recoiled when the idea was put to her. Too soon, she says now. Too raw. Too disturbing for the public. I know I wouldnt want to watch that myself, never mind make it.

Instead, Burstein received clearance to use the footage for a bolder, more wide-ranging project. Hillary, the result, is a four-part biography that frames Clintons life against the arc of the womens movement and recasts her career as a series of giant leaps and bounds. Significantly, it ends not in despair but in hope. Clinton, insists longtime adviser Cheryl Mills, is so much more than another stumbling pretender to the throne. Shes a mould-breaker and a risk-taker. The tip of the spear the person who blazes the trail.

If this makes it sound as if Hillary comes to praise Clinton not bury her well, thats broadly the case (largely flattering, remarked the Hollywood Reporter). Yes, the documentary is at pains to cover its subjects myriad missteps and controversies, be it the lucrative Wall Street speeches, the Whitewater real estate investment affair or the overcooked saga of her private email server. But the talking heads are effectively defence witnesses, solid representatives of blue state USA. We hear nothing from Newt Gingrich, Sean Hannity, Lindsey Graham, or indeed any of her tormentors from the other side.

This, Burstein says, was not for want of trying. But Hillary is so toxic in that community that any association is seen as bad. I made it clear that it was an objective film and that I wanted their point of view. But they also knew that she was participating, which meant that it wasnt going to be some rightwing take-down of her and anything short of that was unappealing. There was no upside, it was just a risk. All of them right away said no.

In the event, the director spent a week at the Clintons home in Chappaqua, a hamlet 30 miles north of New York City. She sat with Hillary for 35 hours of interviews, going back over her various and often conflicting incarnations as lawyer, first lady, senator and globe-trotting secretary of state. Perhaps most compellingly, she sat with Bill, who brokenly recalls his cataclysmic affair with Monica Lewinsky, likening himself to a weary boxer who grabs for something, anything, that might momentarily distract him from the fight. Im a totally different person now than I was 20 years ago, he insists and the physical evidence would appear to bear him out. The former president, arguably the consummate politician of his age, now looks hollowed out, diminished and somehow older than his years.

As for Hillary, who can say for certain? Shes not a confider, one friend needlessly points out. Instead, she sits ramrod straight in her book-lined sitting room, sipping coffee as make-up artists periodically dip in to attend to her hair. Shes candid, impressive and radiates a certain blunt warmth. But on a personal level, shes as guarded as Fort Knox. Every question is a potential hazard. It needs to be quickly checked for tripwires and trapdoors.

There is, of course, good reason for this. With the possible exception of Trump, no US politician inspires such fear and loathing. Shes like a bespoke trigger for the red state white male. There they are the MAGA army, the deplorables burning her effigy at a rally in Kentucky and hollering Iron my shirt! inside the town hall meet-and-greet. Smile! orders a shaven-head in camouflage pants as the candidate walks by and, ever the pro, Clinton duly obliges.

But its small wonder that her smile is a firewall and her laugh flak. Shes hemmed in on both sides, damned either way, regarded as an establishment neocon by the left and a radical feminist harpie by the right. Depressingly, these prejudices sometimes hop the fence: Clintons decision to remain in her marriage only proved how weak she was, right up until the moment it proved that she was Lady Macbeth, a cold-blooded careerist. Im the most investigated innocent person in America, she snorts at the end of one interview session, when she perhaps believes herself to be off-mic.

Burstein previously co-directed The Kid Stays in the Picture, a spry documentary about the Hollywood producer Robert Evans. She freely admits to being a Clinton supporter and feels that most of her problems were caused by forces beyond her control, a reflexive sexism in the land at large. But Burstein does believe that, occasionally, Clinton could have handled herself better. Maybe relaxed her defensive lawyerly crouch, or eased back on the well-paid corporate speaking gigs for the sake of her public image, if nothing else.

The more you get used to seeing women in positions of power, the more likely you are to vote for it

If she has a flaw and she has a few its the optics. Maybe shes not in the pocket of Wall Street, but to give speeches at a time when the banks are being bailed out, all the while knowing shes going to run for president it looks bad. And she has this self-righteous quality that is her blind spot. She thinks, Well, Im not doing anything wrong, no one should think Im doing anything wrong, so who cares what it looks like? And thats what gets her into trouble again and again.

Bill, no doubt about it, was more adept at rolling with the punches, charming his way out of trouble, while Barack Obamas special power was rising nobly above the fray. But its a fools game to use past giants as a kind of roadmap to the White House. Both men (each pioneers in their way) still had to contend with a different set of hurdles to those faced by Hillary. And both, finally, could afford to be looser, less apologetic and more at ease with who they are.

Greatness of spirit is the most important quality that a politician can have, says Joe Klein, one-time Time magazine columnist and bestselling author of Primary Colors, a loosely fictionalised novel about Bills 1992 presidential campaign. The successful Democrats Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, John F Kennedy, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama have all had it. To have greatness of spirit, you have to be optimistic and you have to at least give the appearance of openness. Hillary, he concludes, was never going to be that.

Burstein, thank heavens, spies the obvious problem with this. Its a very male thing to say. I mean, OK, maybe theres some truth to the idea that its hard to pick a woman who has the kind of charm or the greatness of spirit that you see in a man. But is that because it doesnt exist? Or is it because it comes in a different package that we dont know how to recognise?

Undeniably, Hillary offered a different package to the one presented by Donald Trump, the bait-and-switch conman who now sits in the Oval Office, presiding over a 100,000 Covid-19 death toll and an economy in the toilet. For all that, Burstein chooses to end her series not in the ash and rubble of November 2016, but amid the green shoots that have sprung up since. She spotlights the 5 million-strong Womens March that followed the inauguration, the 2018 midterms that turned the lower house blue and the vibrant attempts of Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris to run for president. Obviously, it would have been heartening if one had secured the Democratic nomination. But cant narrow defeats and near misses be markers of progress, too?

Well, yeah, Burstein says. Because change happens incrementally. The fact that all those women ran for president in and of itself is a triumph. What happened in the midterm elections thats a triumph as well. Because this is how it works. The more you see it happening, the more you get used to it. And the more you get used to seeing women in positions of power, the more likely you are to one day vote for it.

Clinton forged the path. Many others now walk it. Two steps forward, one step back.

Hillary is on Sky Documentaries and Now TV from 11 June.

Read the original post:
'As guarded as Fort Knox': the inside story of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign - The Guardian

DOJ Backed Writ of Mandamus in Michael Flynn Case, But Opposed It When Hillary Clintons Emails Were Involved – Law & Crime

We interrupt the hellscape that is 2020 with the news that we are somehow still talking about Hillary Clintons emails.

Clintons legal team argued before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday against a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed by conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch. Clinton was noticed for an in-person deposition, and argued against attending. U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth ruled against Clinton in March, saying she had to be deposed in person. After that, Clintons team pulled out an interesting and seldom-successful legal maneuver: they filed a petition for mandamus against the judge. Mandamus is a legalese for forcing a government official to do their job properly.

Typically, litigants unsatisfied with adverse rulings simply appeal those rulings; petitioning for mandamus is far from a go-to legal strategy. And yet, two very high-profile cases hit courtrooms this week, both hoping that mandamus will save them.This particular case is extra odd, even for mandamus cases.

The appellate court first invited and then ordered the DOJ to come to oral arguments over Clintons deposition.

At those arguments on Tuesday, lawyers for Clinton (and her longtime aide Cheryl Mills, who was also noticed for a deposition) argued that Clinton and Mills have already turned over tens of thousands of messages, and that the real purpose for the depositions was to harass them on the national stage. Clintons attorney, David Kendall, called the deposition social media fundraising and said that Judicial Watch sought it solely to create video footage that can be used for partisan, political attack ads.

Whatever one thinks of Benghazi and the emails and the SCIF and all of that, though, there appears to be something just under the surface here that requires a little attention. The Justice Department was not nearly as interested in saving former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton from a deposition as it was from rescuing Donald Trump, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross or former Vice President Dick Cheney from depositions. The difference may be related to the fact that theres another high-profile mandamus case going on in the D.C. Circuit. That one is about the prosecution of Michael Flynn.

The D.C. Circuit ordered U.S. District JudgeEmmet Sullivanto explainwhy he didnot to immediately dismiss theFlynn prosecution, despite the DOJs motion to drop the case. Sullivan responded, as ordered, by Monday. The appellate court ordered this explanation after Flynns legal team filed an emergency petition for a writ of mandamus in the hopes that Sullivan would be directed to dismiss the case. On Tuesday night, the D.C. Circuit ordered oral arguments in the case.

On the Flynn case, Judge Sullivans lawyer Beth Wilkinson wrote that It is unusual for a criminal defendant to claim innocence and move to withdraw his guilty plea after repeatedly swearing under oath that he committed the crime.

It is unprecedented for an Acting U.S. Attorney to contradict the solemn representations that career prosecutors made time and again, and undermine the district courts legal and factual findings, in moving on his own to dismiss the charge years after two different federal judges accepted the defendants plea, they argued.

The DOJ went to bat Flynn against Sullivan, saying that although a writ of mandamus isdrastic and extraordinary it is entirely appropriate and warranted in this case.

The district court plans plans to subject the Executives enforcement decision to extensive judicial inquiry, scrutiny, oversight, and involvement. Under the Supreme Courts and this Courts precedents, it is clear and indisputable that the district court has no authority to embark on that course, DOJ concluded.

Oralargumentsin the Clinton case were held telephonically due to the pandemic and went nearly three times longer than the court had scheduled. During the arguments, both Judge Nina Pillard (a Barack Obama appointee) and Judge Thomas Griffith (a George W. Bush appointee) called mandamus an extraordinary remedy to be used only rarely.

Those statements seemed to dovetail with Judicial Watchs argument against mandamus, calling such a writ the most potent weapon in the judicial arsenal.

Mark Freeman, arguing on behalf of the DOJ, said that Clintons would-be deposition was different from past cases in which the DOJ did oppose the depositions of high-level policymakers. And hows this for some more legal crossover? Judge Sullivan was the one who slammed Clintons use of a private email server, saying that, we wouldnt be here today if this employee had followed government policy. Whats more, Beth Wilkinsonrepresented Clinton staffers during the FBI investigation into the former Secretary of States use of a private server.

While the Flynn case was not specifically mentioned during Tuesdays oral arguments, it loomed large in the courtroom. Circuit Judge Robert Wilkins (another Obama appointee) is currently the only judge assigned to both the Clinton case and the Flynn case. However, as these cases proceed, it is possible that the entire D.C. Circuit could eventually join the fray.

[screengrab via CBS]

Have a tip we should know? [emailprotected]

Read more here:
DOJ Backed Writ of Mandamus in Michael Flynn Case, But Opposed It When Hillary Clintons Emails Were Involved - Law & Crime

Hillary Clinton slams Trump for tear-gassing peaceful protestors; calls it horrifying – Republic World – Republic World

Former US Secretary of StateHillary Clinton on Tuesday slammed her former election rival US President Donald Trump over attacking the peaceful protestorsat the Lafayette Square in Washington DC. Taking to Twitter, she stated that it was a "horrifying" use of presidential power against the citizens of the country. She further added that this act has no place anywhere.

The US Law Enforcement on Monday used tear gas, rubber bullets, and other tactics to clear out the peaceful protesters before the given curfew at the Lafayette Square in Washington DC so that Trump could take a photo in front of the St John's Church. While the curfew was 7 pm, the protesters were tear-gassed around 6:30 pm.According to international media reports, the law enforcement had given no warning and the firing was sudden. The protesters were protesting against the tragic death of George Floyd who was killed by a police officer.

Read:US President Trump spends Memorial Day retweeting sexist personal attacks on women

George Floyd's tragic death hasnot only angered millions across the world but it has also fueled a fresh wave of protests in various US states. Several protestors also converged outside the White Houseshouting "Black Lives Matter" and "I can't breathe". The focus of the protests is the alleged institutional bigotry and consequent brutalityin American police forces. Meanwhile, severalpolice squads have also joined the protestors in order to express their stand against police brutality and racism.

On Sunday, as many as40 cities and Washington DC across the United States imposed curfews in response to the continuing protests. According to international media reports, around 5,000 National Guard members have been activated in 15 states, as well as in Washington DC, along with 2,000 other members who are prepared to activate if needed. Meanwhile, around 4,000 people across the US States have been arrested during the protests.

Read:Protesters tear-gassed so Trump can walk to photo-op Church; outrage scorches Twitter

Police officer Derek Chauvin had handcuffed George Floyd and made him beg for breath after arresting him in Minnesota. In a video of the incident that went viral all over the social media, Chauvin was kneeling on Floyd's neck which resulted in hisdeath. According toCommissioner of the Minnesota Department of Public Safety (MDPS) John Harrington, the police officer has been fired from his job and has been takeninto custody by the criminal bureau. He added that a trial for the case will begin soon, with the officer facing third-degree murder and manslaughter charges.

Read:WHO pushes to keep ties with US despite Trump's exit plan

Read:Listen to the sirens blare as Trump triggers 3 rows in one go amid George Floyd protests

Read more from the original source:
Hillary Clinton slams Trump for tear-gassing peaceful protestors; calls it horrifying - Republic World - Republic World

Hillary Clinton asks appeals court to help her dodge Judicial Watch deposition on emails and Benghazi – Washington Examiner

A three-judge appeals court panel heard arguments this week from Hillary Clintons lawyer and Judicial Watch as the former secretary of state seeks to avoid a deposition about her private email server and the Benghazi attack talking points.

Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group, argued Tuesday that the depositions of Clinton and Clinton's former chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, ordered by a D.C. district court judge was necessary to understand whether Clinton attempted to avoid the Freedom of Information Act when she improperly used a private server to conduct her State Department business and whether the agency adequately searched for all her emails.

It is certainly within the authority of the district court to hear from the agency head herself about whether there was intent," said Judicial Watch attorney Ramona Cotca.

Clinton wanted to short-circuit this process by using the most potent weapon in the judicial arsenal to prevent the district court from ever being able to reach a determination of whether there was ever an adequate search," Cotca said.

The FBI investigated Clinton's use of the server, hosted in the basement of her home in Chappaqua, New York, while she was secretary of state from 2009 to 2013. Although former FBI Director James Comey found Clinton was extremely careless in handling classified emails, no criminal charges were recommended against anyone following the bureaus "Midyear Exam" investigation. Clinton deleted 33,000 supposedly non-work-related emails.

Why is it that four years after the FBI closed its investigation that there are still additional Clinton emails that are being produced. Why were they not searched or produced or located earlier? Cotca asked, later adding, Even today, the State Department does not know what is the universe of Clinton emails from the State Department that is the significant issue here."

The Judicial Watch lawyer said deposing Clinton would help determine if she had tried to "thwart FOIA."

Clintons legal team asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to issue a writ of mandamus, a corrective order which would instruct the lower court to change its ruling ordering Clinton and Mills to be deposed. U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth said in March, "It is time to hear directly from Secretary Clinton."

We intervened in the case Secretary Clinton did when it became clear that her deposition might be an issue, said David Kendall, Clinton's attorney, who was also appearing for Mills.

Two of the three judges on the panel Obama appointee Nina Pillard and George W. Bush appointee Thomas Griffith stressed that issuing a writ of mandamus would be an extreme move. Pillard also claimed that Judicial Watch's concern about a leaky vessel during the State Departments search for Clinton's emails appeared unfounded."

Judge Robert Wilkins, another Obama appointee on the panel, asked: Why wouldnt it be relevant to depose Secretary Clinton or Ms. Mills to clarify who may have corresponded with either of them or in general about the Benghazi talking points?"

Kendall contended that the only relevant question was: Are there any more documents to produce?

The Clinton lawyer claimed that the real purpose" of the depositions "is harassment."

A State Department review of email practices of dozens of former agency officials and aides to Clinton found some instances of classified information being inappropriately introduced into an unclassified system. But investigators uncovered no persuasive evidence of systematic, deliberate mishandling of classified information.

Mark Freeman, the Justice Department attorney representing the State Department, said the Trump administration didnt support Clintons petition for mandamus.

The State Departments approach to all of these [Clinton] cases from the beginning has just been to get through them to respond to the FOIA requests, to push through any district court litigation, and to bring all these cases, and indeed the entire chapter, to a close, Freeman said, adding, "We have not asked this court to issue the extraordinary remedy of mandamus, and we have not supported the petition at issue here.

The virtual hearing stretched over an hour and a half. The appeals court will likely issue an opinion on whether they will be granting Clinton's request to avoid the deposition in the next few weeks.

Judicial Watch also wants to question Clinton and Mills about the talking points for former United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice's appearances on television shows following the terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi. Members of Ansar al Sharia launched a coordinated assault on Sept. 11, 2012, killing U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens, foreign service officer Sean Smith, and CIA contractors Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. Clinton, Rice, and others incorrectly blamed the attack on a YouTube video.

Some of the Tuesday arguments were reminiscent of the debate over the Justice Departments move to drop charges against retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn. Instead of immediately agreeing with that decision, D.C. District Court Judge Emmett Sullivan appointed an outside amicus, after which the Flynn legal team pursued a writ of mandamus with the D.C. appeals court in an effort to force Sullivan to allow the case to be dismissed. DOJ lawyers weighed in in favor of mandamus in that case.

Cheryl Mills's attorney, Beth Wilkinson, is representing Sullivan in that case. Wilkins is on the three-member panel that will decide whether to grant mandamus.

Read more here:
Hillary Clinton asks appeals court to help her dodge Judicial Watch deposition on emails and Benghazi - Washington Examiner

Young Protesters Say Voting Isnt Enough. Will They Do It Anyway? – The New York Times

Barack Obama has a favorite saying on the campaign trail: Dont boo vote.

And young protesters, galvanized by police brutality and a rash of political disappointments, seem to be sketching out a present-day response:

Sure, maybe. But first, some well-directed fury.

Im tired. Im literally tired. Im tired of having to do this, said Aalayah Eastmond, 19, who survived the 2018 massacre at her high school in Parkland, Fla., became a gun control advocate, saw many legislative efforts stall and is now organizing protests in Washington over police violence against fellow black Americans.

Ms. Eastmond could be forgiven, she suggested, for doubting that the electoral system would meet the moment on its own: We do our job, she said, and then we dont see the people we vote in doing their job.

As nationwide demonstrations continue to simmer, interviews with millennial and Generation Z protesters and activists across racial lines reflect a steady suspicion about the value and effectiveness of voting alone. Their disillusionment threatens to perpetuate a consistent generational gap in election turnout, hinting at a key challenge facing Joseph R. Biden Jr. The former vice president, who announced Friday evening that he had earned a majority of delegates in the Democratic primary contest, has struggled to generate youth enthusiasm despite the demographics broad disapproval of President Trump.

To some degree, this dynamic has figured in political fights across the decades: Voters are disproportionately old; marchers are disproportionately young. (Even in the 2018 midterms, when youth engagement spiked compared with four years prior, turnout registered at about 36 percent for voting-age citizens under 30 and nearly twice that for those 65 and up, according to Census Bureau data.)

But the frustrations of todays younger Americans also speak to the particular conditions of the era, with a preferred candidate in the last two Democratic presidential primaries, Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, falling short twice and a sense that those in office have done little to stem a flood of crises.

The deaths of black people at the hands of law enforcement. The relentless creep of climate change. Recurring economic uncertainty this time amid a pandemic exacerbated by missteps across the federal government.

In an ideal world, all of these issues would be solved by going out and voting, said Zoe Demkovitz, 27, who had supported Mr. Sanderss presidential campaign, as she marched against police violence in Philadelphia. I tried that. I voted for the right people.

And this, she concluded, adding an expletive, still happens.

Democratic leaders are plainly aware of this perception and mindful that a stronger showing from Hillary Clinton among young voters four years ago probably would have turned her fortunes.

Some have moved in recent days to explicitly urge protesters not to overlook November.

In a post on Medium, Mr. Obama disputed the notion that racial bias in criminal justice proves that only protests and direct action can bring about change, and that voting and participation in electoral politics is a waste of time.

Eventually, aspirations have to be translated into specific laws and institutional practices, the former president wrote, italicizing liberally, and in a democracy, that only happens when we elect government officials who are responsive to our demands.

Representative James E. Clyburn of South Carolina, the highest-ranking African-American in Congress, suggested that protests were so valuable in part because they helped introduce new leaders to old systems. At 79, Mr. Clyburn still delights in reminding audiences that he met his wife in jail after a civil rights march in 1960.

I stayed involved, Mr. Clyburn said, and Im now in the United States Congress.

Some younger protesters do not dismiss this prospective path or the wisdom of voting, however grudgingly.

But they say several of the most stinging policy letdowns in recent years have come after nominal election successes.

In New York, Mayor Bill de Blasio won office in 2013 with a pledge to dramatically reform the citys police culture, memorably showcasing his biracial family throughout his campaign. Through a recent stretch of demonstrations that included the arrest of his own daughter, Mr. de Blasio has largely defended the departments approach despite news accounts and videos of officers responding to peaceful protests with often striking aggression.

The mayors transformation has been so pronounced that I have trouble wrapping my head around it, said Ritchie Torres, 32, a Bronx city councilman now running for Congress.

For younger New Yorkers, he said, it was a reminder that electing ostensibly like-minded leadership was not enough. Young people rightly and clearly see the limitations of voting, he said, calling it a necessary but insufficient condition for political engagement.

Even Mr. Obamas White House tenure, made possible in large part by his strength with younger voters, has come in for mixed appraisals.

Evan Weber, 28, the political director for the Sunrise Movement, a group of young liberal environmental activists, cited the dissatisfaction among progressives his age over Mr. Obamas record on financial reform and some climate issues. People are turning to protest out of necessity, Mr. Weber said. We have grown up millennials and especially Generation Z with a system that has either delivered too little or not at all.

People of color have signaled a particular weariness with the implication that voting is a cure-all, especially given the scale of voter suppression efforts and other barriers to the ballot.

Jess Morales Rocketto, 33, a progressive strategist and former campaign aide to Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton, said the standard get-out-and-vote message tended to sound most palatable to people who were planning to vote anyway.

What were really wrestling with is not whether or not people vote but whether people believe institutions matter, she said. That disillusionment is actually about the fight for a generation of civic participation.

On that score, some academics say, the protests might help.

Daniel Q. Gillion, a professor of political science at the University of Pennsylvania, said that his research detailed in a recent book, The Loud Minority, about the importance of demonstrations since the 1960s showed that areas with meaningful protest activity often saw increased turnout in subsequent elections.

Whether younger Americans find a candidate to believe in is another matter. Jason Culler, 38, who also attended the march in Philadelphia, predicted that the current election cycle would not produce leaders who adequately reflected the crowds filling the streets.

Not this election, not the Democratic Party, not the Republican Party, he said. These people dont represent us, thats why were out here still fighting the same thing.

If nothing else, such persistence has proved a point, especially for certain participants.

Ms. Eastmond, the Parkland survivor, recalled the skepticism two years ago that she and other teens stirred to action by the shooting would remain as engaged in political activism as the months passed.

She does not hear those doubts so much anymore.

People were questioning: A lot of the people in that movement, where are they now? she said. Im here. Im just one person, but Im here.

Jon Hurdle contributed reporting from Philadelphia, and Isabella Grulln Paz from New York.

Visit link:
Young Protesters Say Voting Isnt Enough. Will They Do It Anyway? - The New York Times