Archive for the ‘Fifth Amendment’ Category

Maine man who threatened to kill Jewish people with AR-15 seeks dismissal – NewsCenterMaine.com WCSH-WLBZ

A motion filed on behalf of Brian Dennison of Buxton argues that trying him again following a mistrial would violate his Fifth Amendment rights.

PORTLAND, Maine A Buxton man who allegedly tweeted "I'm going to kill Jews with my AF-15 tomorrow" filed a motion to dismiss the criminal case against him, citing his Fifth Amendment rights following a previous mistrial.

Brian Dennison, 25, was arrested in Buxton in September 2021 after a private security firm and the FBI flagged the tweet and another on the same day that said, "I'm building a pipe bomb."

Dennison was charged with transmitting threatening interstate communication, a felony that carries up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

In May, Chief U.S. District Judge Jon D. Levy declared a mistrial on the first day of Dennison's trial after being alerted that one of the witnesses who had just given testimony an FBI agent who first contacted the defendant at his parents' home tested positive for COVID. Levy said he could have attempted to carry on, but the witness had more testimony yet to give.

Before the COVID diagnosis, Dennison's defense lawyer, Thomas Hallett, tried to establish for the jury that Dennison's Tweet while hateful, he said only reached a small number of potential followers, and no reasonable person would feel threatened.

The prosecution, including Assistant U.S. Attorney Craig Wolff, argued Dennison made a clear threat to harm others, with a specific date to carry it out.

In a motion to dismiss filed Wednesday by his attorney, Hallett argued a new trial would violate his Fifth Amendment rights against being prosecuted twice for the same crime.

Hallett writes that there was no "manifest necessity" to declare a mistrial for several reasons, including that the court failed to adequately investigate possible jury contamination, there was no evidence that the witness in question was an essential witness, that any witness unavailability was caused by the government, and that the court did not adequately investigate an alternative to a mistrial.

More NEWS CENTER Maine stories

Read the original post:
Maine man who threatened to kill Jewish people with AR-15 seeks dismissal - NewsCenterMaine.com WCSH-WLBZ

Trevor Noah on supreme court gutting the EPA: So what is their job now? – The Guardian

Trevor Noah

Trevor Noah tore into another outrageous supreme court ruling this week: the 6-3 decision in West Virginia v EPA, which limits the Environmental Protection Agencys power to regulate emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants. The supreme court ruled that Environmental Protection Agency does not have the authority to protect the environment ? So what is their job now? Just to look at the environment and be like oh shit? Noah wondered on Thursday nights Daily Show.

Its always weird to me how the news in America frames some of these stories, he continued, such as calling the ruling a defeat for the Biden administration.

It is a defeat for human life! It has nothing to do with Biden, said Noah.

Experts believe the logic of the ruling will make it difficult for any agency to pass any regulations without Congress passing a specific law first. These agencies arent perfect, dont get me wrong, but could you imagine if Congress had to approve, like, vaccines? he said. Imagine if you had to wait for them. It wouldve never happened. Wed still all be locked in our houses, clapping out of our windows, because Congress couldnt convince Marjorie Taylor Greene that needles werent actually a space alien conspiracy.

The ruling only clarified what has been evident from this supreme court term: From environmental regulations, to abortion, to guns, to school prayer, to voter rights, this is one of the most radical supreme courts in American history, Noah concluded.

And theyre also imposing their power on a country that, for the most part, isnt on board with any of it.

The most recent supreme court term has been a real rollercoaster ride, in that I am nauseous and scared were all going to die, said Stephen Colbert on Thursday evening.

He elaborated: In the last week alone, the justices have weakened the separation of church and state, overturned Roe v Wade, struck down a 109-year-old New York law limiting guns in public and today, they dropped a ruling limiting the EPAs regulation of carbon dioxide emissions from power plants.

What are you thinking, supreme court? he wondered. Its the Environmental. Protection. Agency. If they cant limit emissions, then the agency cant protect the environment. Theyre going to have to change what the P stands for. Maybe Environmental Punch Dolphins in the Taint Agency.

Chief justice John Roberts argued in the majority that while capping carbon emissions would be a solution to the crisis of the day, a decision of such magnitude and consequence rests with Congress itself

Hey! Johnny Bobby! This is an emergency, Colbert fumed. You dont stand on the side of the pool watching somebody drown and say uh, well, actually Mr Lifeguard, you cant jump in and save him, because I saw you eat less than half an hour ago. There are rules.

In a scathing dissent, Justice Elena Kagan wrote: The court appoints itself instead of Congress or the expert agency the decision-maker on climate policy. I cannot think of many things more frightening.

Really? Have you seen their other decisions? Colbert responded. With these maniacs in charge, our only hope is that the smokestacks put on a condom.

And on Late Night, Seth Meyers debriefed another intense week of public January 6 committee hearings. Though he was not optimistic that the hearings would change any hardcore Republicans minds, Meyers said he was hopeful the hearings will influence prosecutors in the justice department, because one area where these hearings have been shockingly successful have been establishing criminal intent and a consciousness of guilt among Trump and his gang of pro-coup weirdos.

Meyers pointed to former national security adviser Michael Flynn, who pushed Trump to use the military to seize voting machines. In his interview with the committee, Flynn consistently invoked the fifth amendment for what you would think would be pretty straightforward questions for any non-fascists.

Flynn refused to answer questions such as: Do you believe the violence on January 6 was justified morally? Do you believe the violence on January 6 was justified legally? And Do you believe in the peaceful transition of power in the United States of America?

Youre pleading the fifth over a hypothetical that has nothing to do with the law? Meyers laughed. The fifth amendment doesnt work like that. Its not Family Feud it doesnt say you have the right to pass after you buzz in.

These are just benign hypotheticals, he continued. This is like if your spouse said how do you feel about monogamy? And your answer was Im invoking my fifth amendment right not to answer questions about your sister. Its not going to end the conversation.

Thats how aware these guys were that they were in legal trouble, he added. They wouldnt even answer questions about whether they believe in the peaceful transfer of power.

More here:
Trevor Noah on supreme court gutting the EPA: So what is their job now? - The Guardian

RYERSON HOLDING CORP : Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance…

Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.

On June 29, 2022 (the "Fifth Amendment Effective Date"), Ryerson HoldingCorporation (the "Company") entered into Amendment No. 5 to the Credit Agreement(the "Fifth Amendment") by and among the Company, Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.("JTR"), the wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and certain directly andindirectly wholly-owned subsidiaries of JTR as borrowers (such subsidiariestogether with JTR, the "Borrowers"), certain directly and indirectlywholly-owned subsidiaries of JTR as guarantors of obligations under the CreditAgreement as amended by the Fifth Amendment (such subsidiaries and the Company,"Guarantors"), the lender parties thereto, and Bank of America, N.A. ("Bank ofAmerica"), as administrative agent and collateral agent. The Fifth Amendmentamends the Credit Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2015 (as amended by the FirstAmendment, dated as of November 16, 2016, the Second Amendment, dated as ofJune 28, 2018, the Third Amendment, dated as of September 23, 2019, and theFourth Amendment, dated as of November 5, 2020, the "Original Credit Agreement"and as further amended by the Fifth Amendment, the "Amended Credit Agreement"),by and among the Borrowers, the Guarantors, the lenders party thereto and Bankof America, as administrative agent and collateral agent. The Fifth Amendment,among other amendments, (i) increases the aggregate amount of the commitmentsunder the Amended Credit Agreement to $1.3 billion, (ii) extends the maturitydate of the Amended Credit Agreement to June 29, 2027 and (iii) modifies theloan pricing (as further described below). The Amended Credit Agreementmaintains the ability to convert up to $100 million of commitments under theAmended Credit Agreement into a "first-in, last-out" subfacility (the "FILOFacility"). Subject to certain limitations, such conversion can be made fromtime to time (but no more than twice in the aggregate) prior to the date that istwo years after the Fifth Amendment Effective Date.

Amounts outstanding under the Amended Credit Agreement bear interest at a ratedetermined by reference to (1) with respect to loans to U.S. Borrowers, (A) thebase rate (the highest of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, Bank of America'sprime rate and one-month Term SOFR rate plus 1.00%) or (B) a Term SOFR rate and(2) with respect to loans to the Canadian Borrower, (A) the prime rate or baserate (the highest of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, Bank of America-CanadaBranch's commercial loan rate and one-month Term SOFR rate plus 1.00%), (B) aTerm SOFR rate (for loans denominated in Dollars) or (C) the Canadian DollarOffered Rate ("CDOR") (for loans denominated in Canadian Dollars). The spreadover the base rate is between 0.25% and 0.50% and the spread over the SOFR andCDOR rates is between 1.25% and 1.50%, depending on the amount available to beborrowed under the Amended Credit Agreement, and subject to SOFR and CDOR ratefloors of 0%; provided that such spreads shall be reduced by 0.125% if theleverage ratio set forth in the most recently delivered compliance certificateis less than or equal to 3.50 to 1.00. The spread with respect to the FILOFacility, if any, will be determined at the time the commitments under theAmended Credit Agreement are converted into such FILO Facility. Overdue amountsduring the existence of a default bear interest at 2% above the rate otherwiseapplicable thereto. Loans advanced under the FILO Facility may only be prepaidif all then outstanding revolving loans are repaid in full.

Pursuant to the Fifth Amendment, certain provisions, including certain negativecovenant baskets, of the Amended Credit Agreement have been revised to permitgreater flexibility. All other material terms of the Amended Credit Agreementremain unchanged from the Original Credit Agreement. For additional informationabout the terms of the Original Credit Facility, see the Company's CurrentReport on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 29,2015, November 16, 2016, June 29, 2018, September 27, 2019 and November 9, 2020,the relevant portions of which are incorporated herein by reference.

A copy of the Fifth Amendment, which includes the Amended Credit Agreement, isattached hereto as Exhibit 10.1 and is incorporated by reference herein. Theabove description of the Fifth Amendment and the Amended Credit Agreement doesnot purport to be complete and is subject to and qualified in its entirety byreference to the texts of the Fifth Amendment and the Amended Credit Agreement.

Item 2.03 Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant.

The information provided in Item 1.01 above is incorporated herein by reference.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Item 8.01 Other Events.

The Company issued a press release relating to the closing of the FifthAmendment to the Credit Agreement. That press release is filed as Exhibit 99.1to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference as ifset forth in full.

Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(d) Exhibits

The following exhibits are being filed with this Current Report on Form 8-K:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Edgar Online, source Glimpses

See the article here:
RYERSON HOLDING CORP : Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance...

Will all Americans hear the words of this brave young woman? | READER COMMENTARY – Baltimore Sun

It was indeed shocking testimony on Tuesday, June 28, by a young Republican aide to Mark Meadows. Under oath, Cassidy Hutchinson told of the days prior to the Jan. 6 insurrection (yes, insurrection) that reveal the intent of then-President Donald Trump (Prosecute Donald Trump: Evidence of criminal intent too damning to ignore, June 30).

What courage this young woman showed probably under intense pressure from colleagues. One can only surmise who and how many were intent on stopping the peaceful transfer of power. She showed her courage and loyalty to her country. Now we only need certain television channels that wont broadcast these very critically important hearings, as well as certain newspapers, to print the news.

This could have been the possible end to our republic. We will always have the ignorant among us who refuse to believe in the truths, but there is no excuse for those in power or those who refused to testify by continually using the Fifth Amendment or just refusing to answer. Such cowards they are.

However, one brave young woman stood out and rose above, to have the courage and brave enough to speak the truth. She is a true patriot. Kudos to Cassidy Hutchinson!

Lynn Pakulla, Ellicott City

Add your voice: Respond to this piece or other Sun content by submitting your own letter.

See the original post here:
Will all Americans hear the words of this brave young woman? | READER COMMENTARY - Baltimore Sun

Lower-level staff, like Cassidy Hutchinson, are invisible but they see it all | Letters – Tampa Bay Times

The invisible ones

Who is Cassidy Hutchinson, key Jan. 6 witness? | June 30

The reason White House staffer Cassidy Hutchinsons testimony is so compelling is that lower-level staffers, like all who serve the wealthy and elite, are invisible. Anyone who has ever served the rich understand that all their lives these elite people view their staffers the same way they view an appliance or piece of furniture. As a worker, if you really want to understand how the wealthy feel about you, do not look at how they treat you around your peers, but how they treat you around their peers. This is where they show their true colors. For most born into wealth and power, it would never enter their heads that their workers have actual, reasoning minds, or any kind of personal life outside serving them.

Brian Valsavage, St. Petersburg

Time to open primaries | June 29

I understand the letter writers frustration about not being able to vote in the primaries, but look at it from my point of view. Why would I want a person outside of my party to help me choose who represents me? In open primaries, a group could vote for an opposing candidate and if enough people voted, it could knock out the top candidate of my party and allow the lesser candidate to be on the general ballot. Then those people could vote for the opposition party candidate.

Mary Sheppard, Riverview

Who is Cassidy Hutchinson, key Jan. 6 witness? | June 30

In a recent deposition for the Jan. 6 committee, former national security adviser Michael Flynn, a retired general, pleaded the Fifth Amendment to avoid self-incrimination when asked if he believed in the peaceful transfer of power in the United States. A long time ago, I served as an officer in the U.S. Air Force for four years, and I took the same oath to protect the Constitution that he did. The thought that he, or any commissioned military officer, would give such an answer to such a basic question regarding our constitutional government is frightening.

Robert Hogue, Apollo Beach

Shots scarce for kids under 5 | June 30

Thirty thousand disadvantaged kids will suffer because our governor, Ron DeSantis, and his surgeon general, Dr. Joseph Ladapo, impeded allowing parents the option of having these kids vaccinated. This silly, childish posturing has already cost many Floridians their health and, some, their lives. When are these two going to wake up and act in the best interest of the people of Florida rather than themselves?

John Stansbury, Brooksville

More:
Lower-level staff, like Cassidy Hutchinson, are invisible but they see it all | Letters - Tampa Bay Times