Archive for the ‘Fifth Amendment’ Category

COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE TRUST INC : Change in Directors or Principal Officers, Financial Statements and Exhibits (form 8-K) – marketscreener.com

Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors;Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.(e) On October 28, 2021, the Board of Directors (the "Board") of CommunityHealthcare Trust Incorporated (the "Company"), at the recommendation of thecompensation committee of the Board (the "Committee"), authorized and approvedthe Sixth Amendment (the "Wallace Sixth Amendment") to the Employment Agreementby and between the Company and Timothy G. Wallace (the "Wallace EmploymentAgreement"), the Third Amendment (the "Dupuy Third Amendment") to the EmploymentAgreement by and between the Company and David H. Dupuy (the "Dupuy EmploymentAgreement"), the Third Amendment (the "Stach Third Amendment") to the Amendedand Restated Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Leigh Ann Stach(the "Stach Employment Agreement"), and the First Amendment (the "Meyer FirstAmendment") to the Employment Agreement by and between the Company and TimothyL. Meyer (the "Meyer Employment Agreement"). These amendments to each respectiveemployment agreements were executed on January 4, 2022 and were effective as ofJanuary 1, 2022.Wallace Employment AgreementThe principal change in the Wallace Employment Agreement resulting from theWallace Sixth Amendment is to increase the base salary paid by the Company toTimothy G. Wallace for his employment as President and Chief Executive Officer("Wallace Base Salary"). In 2021, the Wallace Base Salary was $750,000.00. TheWallace Sixth Amendment increases the Wallace Base Salary to $794,200.00 for2022, which is a $44,200.00 increase from 2021.The foregoing descriptions of the Wallace Sixth Amendment to the WallaceEmployment Agreement are qualified in their entirety by reference to theoriginal Wallace Employment Agreement, which is included as Exhibit 10.6 to theRegistration Statement on Form S-11 of the Company filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the "SEC") on April 2, 2015, the first amendment to theWallace Employment Agreement, which is included as Exhibit 10.1 to the CurrentReport on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 18, 2017, the second amendmentto the Wallace Employment Agreement, which is included as Exhibit 10.1 to theCurrent Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 2, 2018, the thirdamendment to the Wallace Employment Agreement, which is included as Exhibit 10.1to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 3, 2019, thefourth amendment to the Wallace Employment Agreement, which is included asExhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 3,2020, the fifth amendment to the Wallace Employment Agreement, which is includedas Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January4, 2021, and the Wallace Sixth Amendment, which is included as Exhibit 10.1 tothis Current Report on Form 8-K, and are incorporated by reference into thisItem. The foregoing description of the Wallace Sixth Amendment does not purportto be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such exhibits.Dupuy Employment AgreementThe principal change in the Dupuy Employment Agreement resulting from the DupuyThird Amendment is to increase the base salary paid by the Company to David H.Dupuy for his employment as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer("Dupuy Base Salary"). In 2021, the Dupuy Base Salary was $460,000.00. The DupuyThird Amendment increases the Dupuy Base Salary to $487,200.00 for 2022, whichis a $27,200.00 increase from 2021.The foregoing descriptions of the Dupuy Third Amendment to the Dupuy EmploymentAgreement are qualified in their entirety by reference to the Dupuy EmploymentAgreement, which is included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-Kfiled with the SEC on March 11, 2019, the first amendment to the DupuyEmployment Agreement, which is included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report onForm 8-K filed with the SEC on January 3, 2020, the second amendment to theDupuy Employment Agreement, which is included as Exhibit 10.2 to the CurrentReport on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 4, 2021, and the Dupuy ThirdAmendment, which is included as Exhibit 10.2 to this Current Report on Form 8-K,and are incorporated by reference into this Item. The foregoing description ofthe Dupuy Third Amendment does not purport to be complete and is qualified inits entirety by reference to such exhibits.Stach Employment AgreementThe principal change in the Stach Employment Agreement resulting from the StachThird Amendment is to increase the base salary paid by the Company to Leigh AnnStach for her employment as Executive Vice President and Chief AccountingOfficer ("Stach Base Salary"). In 2021, the Stach Base Salary was $387,600.00.The Stach Third Amendment increases the Stach Base Salary to $410,500.00 for2022, which is a $22,900.00 increase from 2021. 2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Edgar Online, source Glimpses

Here is the original post:
COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE TRUST INC : Change in Directors or Principal Officers, Financial Statements and Exhibits (form 8-K) - marketscreener.com

IRS: Stolen property is income unless you return it the same year – NewsNation Now

BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (WIAT) Images circulating on social mediapurport to show an IRS guideline asking taxpayers to report the value of any property they have stolen each year as income.

The guideline is real.

The Internal Revenue Services Publication 17,available on the agencys website, contains a section on stolen property that may leave readers scratching their heads.

If you steal property, you must report its fair market value in your income in the year you steal it unless you return it to its rightful owner in the same year, the guideline states.

The issue of reporting illicit income to the government has raised questions before even in the nations highest court.

In the 1927caseUnited States v. Sullivan, the US Supreme Court considered whether prosecuting criminals for evading taxes on illegal income violated the Fifth Amendment, the provision of the Bill of Rights that protects against self-incrimination.

In that case, a South Carolina bootlegger challenged his conviction on federal charges on the grounds that he could not be required to incriminate himself by declaring illegal income.

In aunanimous opinion, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. rejected that argument.

Nearly a century later, thatcourt opinionstill stands. Since then, many criminals have been convicted for tax evasion in a similar manner, includingAl Caponein 1931.

Go here to see the original:
IRS: Stolen property is income unless you return it the same year - NewsNation Now

Jan. 6 House panel wants interim’ findings released by the summer: report – New York Post

The House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol riot is hoping to release an interim report on its findings this coming summer, according to a new report.

Committee aides familiar with the timeline told the Washington Post that the panel is discussing having public hearings in the winter and spring, followed by the release of the interim report. A final report is expected to be put out before the 2022 midterms.

I think we may issue a couple reports and I would hope for a [full] interim report in the summer, with the eye towards maybe another I dont know if itd be final or another interim report later in the fall, a senior committee aide told the outlet.

We want to tell it from start to finish over a series of weeks, where we can bring out the best witnesses in a way that makes the most sense, another senior committee aide added to the outlet. Our legacy piece and final product will be the select committees report.

Publicly, the committee has avoided giving a specific timeline for hearings and reports.

Earlier this month, committee Chairman Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) told CNN that they dont have a specific date for when hearings will begin.

But well have some rolling hearings that will go on a good bit. It will be a non-traditional type of hearing, he added.

Another committee aide told CNN that the timeframe of the release of the potential reports is subject to change.

Much of the panels investigation has been done privately, with the exception of one public hearing earlier this year that featured testimony from multiple officers who protected the Capitol on the day of the riot.

The committee has subpoenaed several allies of former President Donald Trump for documents, communications and testimony about events before, during and after that day. Many, including ex-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, have refused to comply with the panels request, citing their Fifth Amendment rights.

Last week, the committee requested Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) meet with them to discuss his conversation with Trump on Jan. 6.

Jordan is the second lawmaker the committee has requested information from the first being Freedom Caucus Chairman-elect Scott Perry (R-Pa.). Perry declined the panels request, leading the committee to say it is not ruling out seeking such information using other tools.

While several Trump allies have been threatened with contempt of Congress charges, only one former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon has been indicted. Last month, Bannon was charged with two counts of contempt of Congress after he refused to produce documents or give testimony.

Trump has repeatedly slammed the investigation and is attempting to claim executive privilege over several of the documents and communications requested by the committee.

On Tuesday, the Associated Press reported that the committee had agreed to hold off its effort to get its hands on some Trump administration records at the request of the Biden White House.

View original post here:
Jan. 6 House panel wants interim' findings released by the summer: report - New York Post

Trump Asks SCOTUS to Block Records Release to 1/6 Committee as Allies Plead the Fifth – Newsweek

Former President Donald Trump asked the Supreme Court on Thursday to prevent releasing documents to the House select committee investigating the January 6 Capitol attack.

Trump requested the justices to pause a decision made by a lower court allowing the disclosure of White House records while they consider his position in the case.

"The limited interest the Committee may have in immediately obtaining the requested records pales in comparison to President Trump's interest in securing judicial review before he suffers irreparable harm," Trump's attorney, Jesse R. Binnall, wrote in a court filing.

"[Former] President Trump will suffer irreparable harm through the effective denial of a constitutional and statutory right to be fully heard on a serious disagreement between the former and incumbent President," Binnall added.

According to his lawyer, Trump stated that he was in negotiations with the White House but "abruptly stopped" them after a decision had been made to release the first tranche of documents requested.

Last week, Roger Stone, a former adviser to Trump and a Republican consultant, pleaded the Fifth Amendment for every question he was asked at a deposition with the January 6 panel.

"I did invoke my Fifth Amendment rights to every question not because I have done anything wrong but because I am fully aware of the House Democrats' long history of fabricating perjury charges on the basis of comments that are innocuous, immaterial or irrelevant," Stone told reporters on Friday.

Other Trump allies who were called to testify before the January 6 committee said that they will also invoke the Fifth Amendment. Those allies include conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, former Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark, and attorney John Eastman.

The January 6 committee is seeking documents that could reveal the former president's role in attempting to overturn the 2020 presidential election resultsincluding his part in the "Stop the Steal" rally held before his supporters stormed into the Capitol as lawmakers were in session.

The documents requested also include schedules, speech remarks, call logs, movement logs and events that Trump attended, his communications with former Vice President Mike Pence, and all communications within the White House on January 6, according to a court filing.

Trump also wants to block the release of a draft proclamation honoring two police officers who died during the riot and other documents related to efforts in overturning the election results and his claims of election fraud, CNN reported.

In November, the House select committee's chairman, Representative Bennie Thompson, said that the panel is seeking to know details of the events that unfolded on January 6.

"The select committee is seeking information about the rallies and subsequent march to the Capitol that escalated into a violent mob attacking the Capitol and threatening our democracy," Thompson said.

"We need to know who organized, planned, paid for, and received funds related to those events, as well as what communications organizers had with officials in the White House and Congress," he added.

Newsweek contacted Trump's office and lawyer for comments.

Here is the original post:
Trump Asks SCOTUS to Block Records Release to 1/6 Committee as Allies Plead the Fifth - Newsweek

She called them for help. And they killed her for it; retired commander questions police shooting of daught – OregonLive

Andrea Churna thought someone was trying to kill her when she called Redmond police for help the night of Sept. 20, 2020. Raised around cops, she did what she was asked to do when police arrived to find her armed with a handgun.

She put the weapon down, walked out of her apartment unarmed, clad in a T-shirt and yoga pants, hands up, and laid face down on the carpeted hallway floor outside her door proned out as officers at the scene described it.

None of that kept police from killing her. An officer, just 18 months out of the police academy, shot the 39-year-old mother six times with a high-powered rifle as she lay on the floor 30 feet away. She had been in obvious distress and was asking for her ex-husband.

She called them for help, said an emotional Michael Thomas, Churnas father, as he sat at the dining room table in his home in Port Orchard. And they killed her for it. This is a nightmare for us. Where is the justice for my daughter?

More than a year later, Thomas is dismissive of the process surrounding the investigation into his daughters death. Hes frustrated that nobody can tell him whether the officers involved will be held accountable for what he believes was an unnecessary and excessive use of force against an unarmed, mentally disturbed woman who had asked for help and was trying to surrender.

While any father would feel that way in his position, Thomas opinion carries a certain authority hes a retired Michigan State Police commander who in a distinguished 32-year career investigated or oversaw investigations into dozens of police shootings and homicides himself.

Ive never seen anything like it, said Thomas. Where are the charges? The facts are there. Andrea grew up in a law enforcement family. I feel guilty because her expectation was that if you called police, they would come and help.

The shooting was investigated by the King County Sheriffs Office, whose detectives repeatedly expressed frustration over the lack of cooperation of the Redmond officers and interference by their union attorney, according to sheriffs reports. They turned an admittedly incomplete investigation over to the King County Prosecuting Attorneys Office last spring. Prosecutors have declined to decide whether to pursue criminal charges against the officers pending a coroners inquest a process stalled since 2017 and currently mired in procedural knots.

Fifteen months after the shooting, the officer who killed Churna, 26-year-old Daniel Mendoza, has declined to give a statement to sheriffs investigators or be interviewed about why he pulled the trigger. Several other officers at the scene the only witnesses since there were no civilians in the hallway, no surveillance cameras and none of the officers wore body cameras were sent home that night without talking to investigators.

Police officers enjoy the same Fifth Amendment protections against self-incrimination as all citizens.

They were not admonished against talking to one another and most didnt provide written statements for six days, after they had all consulted with the same guild attorney. Some written statements didnt come in for months. Several officers there that night declined to sit for follow-up interviews or provide any additional information to outside investigators.

The statements that have been provided to us up to this point are not adequate or conducive for us to conduct a thorough investigation, wrote King County sheriffs Detective Sarah Gerlitz in an email to her supervisors Nov. 14, 2020, more than six weeks after the shooting.

In most criminal investigations, potential suspects are generally separated as the sheriffs detectives attempted here or otherwise asked not to speak with one another to avoid collusion or dilution of recollection. In addition, the routine practice of delaying questioning of officers involved in using force also is controversial; additional time is rarely afforded citizens suspected of violent crimes.

All of those statements are suspect, said Kim Zak, an attorney hired by Churnas parents, who are planning a lawsuit.

A review of several hundred pages of investigative reports, diagrams, crime-scene photographs and dispatch calls and logs obtained by The Seattle Times through a public disclosure request showed most of those officers continue their silence today.

This past September, after the sheriffs criminal investigation was completed, Redmond Chief Darrell Lowe announced he was launching an internal investigation into the shooting, stating that he had employed the Force Science Institute out of Illinois to provide an independent force review and analysis of the shooting.

However, FSI has been denounced by civil rights attorneys, psychologists and the Department of Justice for its methods and conclusions. A 2015 New York Times investigation pointed out that foundation consultants, in hundreds of cases involving police shootings, almost universally sided with the officer, even when the suspect was unarmed.

The results of the internal investigation are pending.

Chief Lowe, in a statement last week, stated that the Churna shooting will also be the subject of a coroners inquest. However, it rests at No. 43 in a list of 52 pending inquests into law enforcement-related deaths in King County since 2017, and it could be years before an inquest jury hears the case and the prosecutors office gets its recommendation.

Trying to rebuild

Andrea Churna had moved into the Modera Apartments in Redmond in August 2020 after moving out of her parents house in Port Orchard. A graduate of Vanderbilt University, she was a successful IT and tech recruiter who earned a six-figure salary. Churna was attempting to rebuild her life after a period where she struggled with post-traumatic stress disorder and other emotional and psychological issues, according to her family and the sheriffs investigation.

She remained close with her ex-husband, Timothy Churna, a senior attorney at Microsoft, who shared joint custody of their 7-year-old son. Tim Churna had been taking care of the boy while his mother got back on her feet after she returned to Washington after briefly living in California. While they had separated nearly six years earlier and divorced the previous year, Tim Churna said, they spoke almost daily and texted frequently.

In California, Churna had been stalked by a former boyfriend, a mixed martial arts fighter, her ex-husband said. She would obsess over it. In irrational moments, according to police interviews with friends and family, she was convinced a network of people were attempting to kidnap her and her son and force them into sex slavery.

The thing is, she recognized she might not be thinking clearly, Tim Churna said. She let me have our son full-time for a period so she could work through this. She was highly functional. She knew some of this was irrational.

It was during one of those periods that she moved home with her parents. Thomas, her father, said she wanted to be able to protect herself and thought she might feel safer if she had a gun, so he helped her buy a 9-mm Smith & Wesson semiautomatic pistol and taught her to shoot it.

After several months at home, feeling better and seeing a doctor, Churna moved from Port Orchard to the upscale Modera Apartments, settling into a small, one-bedroom unit on the fourth floor, with a balcony overlooking an enclosed courtyard.

The night of the shooting, Tim Churna said, he had spoken with Andrea and felt she was in crisis, according to his statement to the Sheriffs Office. He was already on his way to her apartment when she called him from her balcony.

The investigation would show that Churna a week earlier had been prescribed a stimulant similar to Adderall and possibly had ingested a months supply in just a few days. Friends who had spoken with her said she apparently hadnt slept for days because she was worried about being kidnapped.

Called police

At 9:24 p.m. on Sept. 20, 2020, a dispatcher at the NORCOM 911 center took a call from a woman at Modera who said that someone was trying to kill her in her apartment and then hung up without giving an apartment number or details. Attempts by the dispatcher to call the number back failed, and a trio of officers from Redmond responded to the call.

Officers Brian Hood, Ty Tomlinson and Evan Barnard arrived just before 9:30 p.m., and a resident let them inside the building and used his key fob to give them access to the courtyard and elevator.

The trio of officers entered the courtyard and immediately saw a woman scaling the outside rails of a balcony on the fourth floor, according to Hood. She identified herself as Andrea, saying she had called police and was outside because she didnt feel safe in her apartment.

Barnard and Tomlinson took to the stairs to the fourth floor while Hood remained in the courtyard talking to Churna.

I asked her if someone else was inside, and she said, No, but I shot at someone, " Hood wrote in a report. He immediately notified Tomlinson and Barnard, who were making their way upstairs. I also advised she may be having mental health issues, Hood said.

Hood asked Churna if she had access to a firearm. She responded yeah and, over the officers objections, ran back into the apartment. She returned to the balcony a moment later holding a black handgun.

Hoods report states that she leaned her arm over the rail and pointed the gun directly at me. The officer said he feared for his life, but that the distance was too great for him to shoot at her, so he sought cover behind a wall. Churna did not fire.

Hood radioed to dispatch and said the woman was armed.

A neighbor on the third floor directly across the courtyard from Churnas apartment, Joshi Pranav, later told King County sheriffs detectives that he witnessed the exchange.

The officer asked if she had shot and she said [she] thought she shot at someone in the apartment, Pranav said. When she came back out, Pranav was adamant that the womans actions seemed consistent with showing the officer she had a firearm, the report said.

Hood told Churna to put down the gun, which she did. It was found later on a table on the balcony. Evidence at the scene indicated that Churna had fired a single shot into the door of her apartment before officers arrived and that the gun had malfunctioned, according to reports.

Hood explained to Churna that there were other officers in the building and told her it was important that she keep her hands visible at all times.

Tomlinson and Barnard, meantime, converged on apartment 450, the first apartment on the west side of the long leg of an interior hallway shaped like a T, with the top facing north.

Their account comes from unsigned and undated written statements given to sheriffs detectives by their attorney, Lisa Elliott, in March 2021, six months after the shooting. Tomlinson and Barnard refused to be interviewed by sheriffs investigators.

Hood radioed to dispatch and the other officers that Churna had returned inside her apartment. Tomlinson, in his written statement, said he heard the front door open and a woman walk into the hallway with a gun in her hand. He said he retreated down the east hallway of the T intersection when I saw her come into the hallway opening with the gun pointed directly at me.

Tomlinson opened fire with his 9-mm Glock service handgun, firing six shots at Churna. Barnard, meantime, had run down the west hallway and believed he had come under fire as Tomlinsons rounds impacted. He fired twice toward the intersection.

Churna, uninjured, retreated back to the apartment.

Four of the rounds, apparently fired by Tomlinson, punched through a hallway wall, lodging in a closet and living room wall of an empty apartment. Another round hit a door of an occupied apartment, according to investigative reports. Evidence at the scene showed multiple bullet strikes, ricochets, shell cases and bullet fragments up and down the hallway.

The shots fired announcement sent at least six other Redmond officers and police from Kirkland roaring to the apartment complex.

Several were armed with M4 assault-style rifles and two carried ballistic shields designed to stop a small-arms bullet. Officer Mendoza, who had completed his field training just five months earlier, raced upstairs and took up a position at the intersection of the T, armed with a .223-caliber rifle loaded with a 30-round magazine.

Churna, meantime, returned to the balcony, now on a cellphone talking to her ex-husband, Tim, who was just arriving at the apartment complex.

Hood, still below in the courtyard, asked whether she had fired at the officers or if she was hurt.

No, they shot at me, she said. Hood said he pleaded with her to stay on the balcony, but again she went inside. In his report, Hood noted in his report that when she returned to the balcony, she was unarmed and holding a cellphone. He broadcast over the radio that she told him the gun was inside.

In the hallway, at least five officers crowded at the intersection and were coming up with an arrest plan. Only one officer had a less-lethal option Mendoza, who in addition to the rifle, also had a Taser.

Churna, who was 5-feet-3 and weighed 150 pounds, walked out of the apartment with her hands up. Officers ordered her to lie face down, head facing the other direction, and cross her ankles. She complied.

Several officers, using profanity, told her if she moved she would be shot multiple times. At least five officers were crowded at the top of the T, none more than 10 yards from where Churna lay waiting to be arrested.

While waiting for additional officers and a shield to move up to the female, the female started to turn her head towards us and asked, is my ex-husband here? " Barnard wrote in his statement. He said she inched around nearly 90 degrees and was reaching for the door handle when Mendoza opened fire.

Barnard and at least one other officer wrote that they feared Churna was trying to retrieve the gun.

Computer-assisted dispatch logs, time-stamped dispatch tapes and written officer statements indicated Churna was on the floor in the hallway for more than three minutes before shots were fired.

Churna was struck six times. An autopsy showed that four of the rounds tore through her left arm and shoulder and through her torso, resulting in catastrophic injuries to her arm, lungs, liver, heart, breast and spine. Officers handcuffed her and attempted first aid, but she died within minutes. The medical examiner said three of the six wounds were fatal.

One of the officers at the scene, a trainee who had been on the streets for just a few weeks, was so distraught and upset after trying to help her that his training officer took his firearms as a precaution.

Memorial balloon

Redmond police told the family and public that Churna had confronted officers with a gun and was shot.

Thomas, Churnas father, 30 years as a cop, initially believed this account and expressed concern for the officers, knowing how traumatic shooting someone can be. After obtaining a copy of the sheriffs investigation, he doesnt feel that way anymore.

Where was the de-escalation? he asked. They stood there and yelled obscenities at her and threatened her for nearly five minutes and then shot her. Why couldnt they just walk down and put the cuffs on? They knew she didnt have a gun.

Last Wednesday, on what would be his ex-wifes 41st birthday, Timothy Churna and his son planned to launch a memorial balloon in her memory. Tim Churna said the boy, now 8, knows his mothers death had something to do with her mental health, but he doesnt know that police were involved.

The boy idolizes his ex-police detective grandfather, Michael, and nobody has quite figured out how to tell him what happened yet.

Michael Churna broke down when the topic came up. She was a holiday baby, he said of his only daughter. His voice cracked and there were tears on his cheeks. We brought her home in a Christmas stocking. And he wept.

View post:
She called them for help. And they killed her for it; retired commander questions police shooting of daught - OregonLive