Archive for the ‘European Union’ Category

Free trade agreement between Australia and the European Union back on the table – with some caveats – Lexology

The AU-EU FTA would cover goods, services and business investment, but the EU has set some new demands which link trade liberalisation to climate.

The free trade agreement between Australia and the European Union (AU-EU FTA) which aims to drive Australian exports, economic growth and job creation appears to be back on the table with negotiations restarting later this year, albeit with some hard lines on climate targets set by the European Union (EU).

In 2016, due to the Brexit fallout, the Turnbull Government announced that it had commenced work towards negotiations with the EU for an AU-EU FTA, with the first round of negotiations occurring in early July 2018.

The most recent round of negotiations for the AU-EU FTA took place virtually on 7-18 February 2022, but further negotiations have been on pause since France placed a block on further progress following the Morrison Government's cancellation of the French contract to supply diesel-powered submarines. Australia's relations with France had been on ice until this May, when newly elected Anthony Albanese made efforts to reinvigorate a spirit of co-operation between the nations, with there now being clear signs from the EU about proceeding with the negotiations.

The shape of those negotiations is a bit clearer, with reports that the EU will include sanctions for failure to reach Paris Agreement targets for emissions reductions (Australia has already satisfied a requirement to make a commitment on carbon neutrality). Some members of the EU Parliament have also called for more sustainability commitments in trade agreements as well, which could be a factor as the EU Parliament must approve any FTA.

Apart from climate issues, the EU is also looking for new laws on geographic indicators, which would bring rules already in place for wine to foodstuffs, while pushing back on the size of beef, lamb and dairy quotas.

Why does Australia need a free trade agreement with the EU?

The AU-EU FTA intends to leverage the partnership between Australia and the EU, given that they both share a commitment to the rule of law, global norms and free and open markets. According to Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), Australia exported goods and services to the value of $18.7 billion in 2019-20, and imported $59.9 billion in the same period.

As a bloc, the EU is a high-income market with a population of just under 450 million people and a GDP of around US$15 trillion. In 2020, it was Australias second largest trading partner, as well as our seventh largest export destination, fourth largest services export market and second largest source of foreign investment.

>Similar to the Australia-United Kingdom Free Trade Agreement that was signed on 17 December 2021, an agreement with the EU will provide new opportunities for Australian goods and services in a highly significant market, which in turn will assist Australia with its post-pandemic economic recovery. The AU-EU FTA also has the ability to afford Australian exporters with a competitive edge and more choice about where they do business, while granting Australian consumers greater choice in goods and services at lower prices.

Potential benefits of the AU-EU FTA

The AU-EU FTA has, like most FTAs, the potential to create significant benefits to Australia, such as:

What could the AU-EU FTA deliver?

Australia has been at the forefront of concluding modern, comprehensive FTAs which aim to maximise tariff reductions for Australian exporters, open up services markets, and set rules to enhance trade and investment, reduce regulatory risk and support further liberalisation.

The AU-EU FTA would cover goods, services and business investment and is considered key if Australia is to reduce its trade dependency on China. According to an impact assessment, trade in goods and services between the two partners could increase by around a third.

For example, the AU-EU FTA has the potential to deliver:

Timeline and next steps for the AU-EU FTA

Currently, the Australian Government is aiming to accelerate negotiations and progress the AU-EU FTA, with the next formal round of negotiation in October.

Throughout the negotiation period, DFAT indicates that it would be interested to receive submissions from interested individuals and groups on the potential opportunities and impacts of the AU-EU FTA. In your submission, it would be worthwhile considering how the AU-EU FTA may impact your business and the opportunities that will likely arise from a partnership with the EU to assist the Government in determining Australia's key priorities for further negotiations of the FTA.

In addition, as the AU-EU FTA is likely to have significant implications for Australian business and might open up various opportunities that will be worth taking advantage of, Australian businesses involved in trade and foreign investment, or those who are seeking to attract foreign capital, should prepare for the changing landscape and continue to stay abreast of the changes yet to come.

See the original post here:
Free trade agreement between Australia and the European Union back on the table - with some caveats - Lexology

European Union – Data Privacy and Protection | Privacy Shield

The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which governs how personal data of individuals in the EU may be processed and transferred, went into effect on May 25, 2018. GDPR is a comprehensive privacy legislation that applies across sectors and to companies of all sizes. It replaces the Data Protection Directive 1995/46. The overall objectives of the measures are the same laying down the rules for the protection of personal data and for the movement of data.

GDPR is broad in scope and uses broad definitions. Personal data is any information that relates to an identified or identifiable living individual (data subject) such as a name, email address, tax ID number, online identifier, etc. Processing data includes actions such as collecting, recording, storing and transferring data.

A company that is not established in the Union may have to comply with the Regulation when processing personal data of EU and EEA residents (EEA countries are Norway, Lichtenstein and Switzerland):a) If the company offers goods or services to data subjects in the EU; or,b) If the company is monitoring data subjects behavior taking place within the EU.

The mere accessibility of a companys website in the EU is insufficient to subject a company to GDPR, but other evidence of the intent to offer goods or services in the EU would be relevant.

As a general rule, companies that are not established in the EU but that are subject to GDPR must designate in writing an EU representative for purposes of GDPR compliance. There is an exception to this requirement for small scale, occasional processing of non-sensitive data.

Fines in case of non-compliance can reach up to 4% of the annual worldwide revenue or 20 million euros whichever is higher. Companies of all sizes and sectors should consider GDPR as part of their overall compliance effort with assistance of legal counsel.

The European Commission and Data Protection Authorities are releasing official guidelines to help companies with their compliance process. These documents relate, for instance, to the role of the data protection officer, personal data breach notification, data protection impact assessment.

Note: the EU is currently updating its e-privacy legislation governing confidentiality of communications. This legislative instrument once enacted will add several requirements in addition to the GDPR. We encourage U.S. exporters to monitor this situation as it evolves through the EU legislative process.

For more information: Full GDPR textOfficial Press Release

European Commission guidance:https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_enhttps://ec.europa.eu/commission/priorities/justice-and-fundamental-rights/data-protection/2018-reform-eu-data-protection-rules_en https://edpb.europa.eu/edpb_enhttps://edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/general-guidance/gdpr-guidelines-recommendations-best-practices_en

Transferring Customer Data to Countries outside the EUThe General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) provides for the free flow of personal data within the EU but also for its protection when it leaves the regions borders.GDPR sets out obligations on data controllers (those in charge of deciding what personal data is collected and how/why it is processed), on data processors (those who act on behalf of the controller) and gives rights to data subjects (the individuals to whom the data relates). These rules were designed to provide a high level of privacy protection for personal data and were complemented by measures to ensure the protection is maintained when data leaves the region, whether it is transferred to controllers, processors or to third parties (e.g. subcontractors). EU legislators put restrictions on transfers of personal data outside of the EU, specifying that such data could only be exported if adequate protection is provided.

The European Commission (EC) is responsible for assessing whether a country outside the EU has a legal framework that provides enough protection for it to issue an adequacy finding to that country. The U.S. has never sought to be found adequate by the EC. This means that U.S. companies can only receive personal data from the EU if they:

For more information, consult the European Commissions webpage on data transfers outside the EU https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/international-dimension-data-protection_en

Important note:The legal environment for data transfers to the United States continues to evolve. Companies that transfer EU citizen data to the United States as part of a commercial transaction should consult with an attorney, who specializes in EU data privacy law, to determine what options may be available for a transaction.

About the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield The EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework was designed by the U.S. Department of Commerce and theEuropean Commission to provide companies on both sides of the Atlantic with a mechanism to comply with EU data protection requirements when transferring personal data from the European Union to the United States in support of transatlantic commerce.For more information on the EU-U.S. Privacy ShieldFor more information about other mechanisms of transfer, please refer to:https://www.export.gov/article?id=European-Union-Transferring-Personal-Data-From-the-EU-to-the-UShttps://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/international-dimension-data-protection_en

European Union 28 Information Management Market Access

View post:
European Union - Data Privacy and Protection | Privacy Shield

Anti-Speeding Technology Is Now Mandatory in European Union – autoweek.com

Construction Photography/AvalonGetty Images

The European Union's intelligent speed assistance program took effect on Wednesday, starting a new era of enhanced safety regulations brought forward by the cluster of European nations. The program is focused on limiting speeding through four different warning systems installed in all new chassis introduced in the EU. Manufacturers are only required to pick one system and will be able to choose which of the four warning systems to install, though some have already elected to install multiple.

Each warning system functions differently with some being progressively more invasive than others. On the light end of the spectrum, some cars will note speed limits through sign-recognition cameras or GPS data and audibly alert the driver if they are exceeding them. Using the same technology, other cars will produce a vibration throughout the driver's cockpit alerting them of their speed. Alternatively, the other two warning systems rely on the tension of the accelerator pedal, known as haptic feedback and speed control function.

Haptic feedback requires the car to recognize speed signs and, if the driver is in fact speeding, automatically push back against the driver's accelerator pedal pressure. The speed control function goes one step further by cutting power input from the pedal once the speed limit is reached. It's important to note that drivers can override all four of these systems, either by acknowledging the audible or vibrating warnings or by pushing harder on the accelerator in the case of the haptic feedback or speed control function.

For many enthusiasts reading this, these technologies sound like a nightmare to the analog purists inside of us. The EU doesn't want these technologies to take human decision-making out of driving, however; these ISA systems are meant to be reminders, not restrictors.

"It should be possible to switch off intelligent speed assistance, for instance, when a driver experiences false warnings or inappropriate feedback as a result of inclement weather conditions, temporarily conflicting road markings in construction zones, or misleading, defective or missing road signs," the text of the General Vehicle Safety Regulation reads. Additionally, the regulatory requirements of the ISA system explicitly states that, "it shall not affect the possibility, for the drivers, of exceeding the systems prompted vehicle speed."

As with all new technologies, the likelihood of real-world errors and future troubleshooting is high. Beyond technological faults, driver annoyance with auditory warnings was also considered, seeing as it may lead operators to turn the system off completely. As the program is tested, the focus on maintaining some degree of driver autonomy will be imperative to its success. The legislation was adopted by the European Commission, though it is currently under two-month scrutiny from the European Parliament and Council.

All things considered, the technology is a good-faith effort to reduce fatal crashes at a time of soaring traffic deaths. Analysis of trial runs by the European Transport Safety Council suggests that this technology will reduce speeding by 30% and traffic deaths by 20%. Manufacturers like Ford and Renault are already experimenting with the technology across the European Union and even in the United Kingdom. And while the current rule only applies to all-new models, ISA systems will become mandatory for all new cars sold starting July 2024.

Do you think anti-speed technology would work on this side of the pond? Share your thoughts on in the comments below.

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

Read the original here:
Anti-Speeding Technology Is Now Mandatory in European Union - autoweek.com

Russia lost its influence in European Union – Zelensky – Ukrinform

Russia tried in every possible way to disrupt the addresses of the President of Ukraine to the peoples and parliaments of European countries, but it has lost its influence in the European Union.

President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky said this in his address to the Slovenian parliament, Ukrinform reports.

I am grateful to all the countries of the European Union in which such appeals of mine took place. We know that Russia tried to disrupt them, tried to use its various connections - political, diplomatic, even business. In Moscow they understand that they have nothing to oppose such trust between the people of Ukraine and Europe and such communication activity with. Therefore, they threatened Europeans, manipulated those who depend on them. But this is already the twenty-fourth parliament of the twenty-seven countries of the European Union, and I want to congratulate you on this obvious evidence that Russia has lost its influence in the European Union. The fact remains the following: most of the countries of the European Union cannot be ruled by Russia. And this is a new political reality in Europe, which we achieved together - every country that stood up for the defense of our common freedom, Zelensky said.

He added that the words about freedom are not just words, but a key goal of the anti-war coalition. Now, according to the President of Ukraine, new and strong security, political and economic steps are being taken on the basis of a new unity.

And legal steps are next, namely: bringing Russian war criminals to justice. Most importantly, by going through this terrible challenge of the Russian war together, we prove that European values do not remain just a reference to old treaties and conventions, do not serve as formal criteria only at the level of rhetoric, but are the real basis of life on the continent here and now. And every country of the united Europe made its contribution to this, he said.

On February 24, 2022, Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Russian troops are shelling and destroying the key infrastructure facilities in Ukraine, firing at Ukrainian cities and villages with artillery, multiple launch rocket systems and ballistic missiles.

Read more:
Russia lost its influence in European Union - Zelensky - Ukrinform

The Guide to Sanctions – Third Edition – Global Investigations Review

Introduction

Export controls can be described as restrictions on international trade in certain sensitive goods, software and technology (hereinafter, Items). Generally, this involves licensing requirements or prohibitions on the cross-border movement of Items identified on specified control lists established at national or international level, or when sensitive end uses are involved, with potentially severe consequences for non-compliance.

In the European Union, export controls include both EU-wide restrictions provided for through EU legislation, as well as EU Member State-specific export controls set out at a national level. In each case, these controls are administered and enforced at national Member State level, resulting in certain variations in how export controls are applied across the EU.

This chapter gives an overview of export control rules under EU law, covering the key types of controls on Items subject to EU export controls; the circumstances in which export controls apply; export licensing requirements and practicalities; and the potential consequences of non-compliance.

EU export controls consist of a patchwork of EU-wide rules set out pursuant to EU legislation and local rules applied by individual Member States. These rules predominantly implement export controls on Items agreed pursuant to international frameworks to which the EU or its Member States are party (i.e., the Wassenaar Arrangement, the Australia Group (chemical weapons), the Nuclear Suppliers Group and the Missile Technology Control Regime).

In line with these international frameworks, EU export controls apply to both tangible and intangible exports of controlled Items (i.e., types of goods, software or technology specifically identified on relevant export control lists, such as the EU list of dual-use controlled Items as described below). Each of these controlled Items will be classified under a relevant export control regime, with a specific control entry (the EU equivalent of a US Export Control Classification Number); otherwise, the Item will be classified as NLR (no licence required). EU export control rules can also apply to exports of non-listed Items (i.e., those that do not specifically appear on export control lists) if there is knowledge, awareness or (in some cases) suspicion of a sensitive end use (known as catch all end-use controls). This includes certain end uses relating to the military sector or weapons of mass destruction.

The two main export control regimes in the EU are those concerning: (1) dual-use export controls (i.e., Items that can be used for commercial or civilian purposes but also for military purposes); and (2) military export controls, generally in relation to listed Items that are specially designed or modified for military use. As noted below, certain other regimes apply in the EU, including in relation to torture equipment.

When considering any transaction under EU export control rules, key questions to consider include the following.

In the EU, the key dual-use export control legislation is currently the EU Dual-Use Regulation. This sets out EU-wide controls that are directly applicable in all EU Member States, including controls on specifically listed dual-use Items and in respect of exports relating to controlled end uses.

Under the EU Dual-Use Regulation, dual-use Items are defined as items, including software and technology, which can be used for both civil and military purposes, and includes items that can be used for the design, development, production or use of nuclear, chemical or biological weapons or their means of delivery, including all items that can be used for both non-explosive uses and assisting in any way in the manufacture of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.

The EU Dual-Use Regulation sets out lists of specific types of dual-use Items for which a licence (referred to within the Regulation as an authorisation) must be obtained in advance of export. Items covered by the EU Dual-Use Regulation include:

The main list of controlled Items can be found in Annex I, which, in summary, specifies Items for which a licence must be obtained before they are exported from within to outside the EU territory. Certain record-keeping and paperwork requirements also apply in respect of intra-EU transfers of Items listed in Annex I.

Annex I currently consists of 10 categories of controlled Items on more than 300 pages of the Regulation, with control entries including specific technical parameters (such as detailed definitions, exemptions and exceptions). The Items controlled in Annex I include various goods, software and technology used in a range of sectors, including marine, aerospace, chemicals, oil and gas, mining, pharmaceutical and nuclear. Statistical estimates published by the European Commission indicate that, in 2019, authorised dual-use trade amounted to 31.5 billion, representing 1.7 per cent of total extra-EU exports.

In line with international export control frameworks as noted above, the 10 categories in Annex I to the EU Dual-Use Regulation are as follows:

Each of these categories is further subdivided into sections, covering:

Each of these sections is then further subdivided into individual control entries for particular Items, often very technical and detailed in nature, with certain exceptions and exemptions. There are also a number of general exceptions from export control. These cover, for example, software and technology that is in the public domain.

By way of example of an Annex I dual-use Item, a server with controlled encryption functionality may be caught within Annex I control list entry 5A002a1, denoting that:

A much shorter list of more sensitive Items is set out at Annex IV to the EU Dual-Use Regulation. Annex IV is divided into two Parts. Items listed in Part I can be transferred within the EU on the basis of a National General Authorisation. In contrast, Part II contains Items for which a licence is also required for intra-EU transfers. These Items include highly sensitive Items, such as cryptanalytic Items, most nuclear-related Items, stealth-related technology, and Items relating to missiles and chemical warfare.

In addition to control lists set out under the EU Dual-Use Regulation, EU Member States may also set out their own lists of controlled dual-use Items. Germany, for instance, has done so by including some dual-use Items on the national export list that are not already covered by the EU Dual-Use Regulation, if they are to be exported to certain countries. One example is entry 6A908, which refers to radar-based navigation or surveillance systems for shipping or air traffic or components thereof that are not already covered under Annex I to the EU Dual-Use Regulation, if the destination of the Items is Iran.

As noted above, a licence may be required in respect of Items that are not controlled under a relevant list, when the transaction may involve a controlled end use. These are the catch all controls, as any Item could in theory be subject to a licensing requirement depending on the end use.

Key end-use controls under the EU Dual-Use Regulation include the following:

In addition, under Article 9 of the EU Dual-Use Regulation, EU Member States may decide to prohibit or impose an authorisation requirement on the export of non-listed Items for reasons of public security, including the prevention of acts of terrorism, or human rights considerations.

A licence will be required for any export of Annex I-listed Items or of any non-listed Items in respect of a controlled end use. The concept of an export captures both (1) shipments of tangible (physical) goods from within to outside the territory of the EU (including hand carries of Items), and (2) intangible transfers of controlled software or technology from within the EU to legal and natural persons and partnerships outside the EU. These exports can occur intra-group and need not involve any sale, consideration or transfer of ownership.

The concept of an intangible transfer under EU export controls is particularly broad and is a common area in which companies can fall foul of the rules. Examples include:

Licences are also required in certain circumstances when a person or entity in the EU is involved in brokering (e.g., negotiating or arranging) the sale or supply of Items between two third (i.e., non-EU) countries. Provided they carry out brokering services from the EU into the territory of a non-EU country, this also applies to non-EU persons or entities. These controls typically apply when the relevant EU broker has been informed or is aware of a controlled WMD or military end use in respect of a listed Annex I Item. However, Member States are also permitted to extend brokering controls to capture:

Likewise, while Items in transit through the EU (i.e., passing through the EU from and to a non-EU destination) are not subject to EU dual-use export controls, Member States may prohibit Items in transit if they are or may be intended for a controlled WMD or military end use.

As the EU is a single customs territory allowing for free movement of goods, export controls principally apply to exports of dual-use goods from the EU to a destination outside the EU. Intra-EU movements of most dual-use Items do not normally require a licence. However, there are a few important points to note:

As noted below, military controlled Items generally require a licence for transfers between EU Member States, as these controls are set at national level.

As noted above, certain sensitive dual-use Items as listed under Annex IV to the EU Dual-Use Regulation require an authorisation to be transferred between EU Member States. Those Items listed in Part 1 of Annex IV can be transferred on the basis of a National General Authorisation while Items listed in Part 2 of Annex IV cannot.

Licences may be required for intra-EU movements of dual-use Items when the Items will be re-exported from the EU without being further processed, and a licence would be required to export them from the EU. This is an optional control that only certain EU Member States have implemented.

All intra-EU transfers of Items listed in Annex I to the EU Dual-Use Regulation must be accompanied by a statement that the Items are subject to control if exported from the EU. The statement should appear in the relevant commercial documents (e.g., contracts, order confirmations, invoices and dispatch notes). Additionally, records of intra-EU transfers must be kept for at least three years from the end of the calendar year in which the transfer took place and shall be produced, on request, to the competent authority.

Licences are also required in certain instances where an entity provides technical assistance related to Items listed in Annex I from the territory of the EU into the territory of a third country; or an EU entity provides technical assistance within the territory of a third country or to a resident of a third country temporarily present in the EU. These controls typically apply when the relevant supplier has been informed or is aware of a controlled WMD or military end use in respect of the Items in question.

Technical assistance is any technical support related to repairs, development, manufacture, assembly, testing, maintenance or any other technical service, and may take forms such as instruction, advice, training, transmission of working knowledge or skills or consulting services, including by electronic means as well as by telephone or any other verbal forms of assistance.

Export controls in relation to military Items are controlled by each EU Member State. The EU does maintain a common military list, setting out a list of military Items subject to export controls. This list is adopted annually by the Council, pursuant to Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing control of exports of military technology and equipment. However, this list is non-binding, and it is up to each Member State to legislate for and implement its own, national military export controls.

Generally, controls on military Items as adopted by individual Member States and pursuant to the EU common military list capture Items that are either specially designed or modified for military use. These terms are not currently defined on a pan-EU basis but are generally very broadly interpreted. This can apply (for example) to Items that are simply developed or customised for a military customer even if they have civilian applications.

The EU common military list currently captures 22 categories of military-controlled Items, again capturing goods, software and technology. Items caught by this list are set out in entries ML1 to ML22, inclusive, covering a range of Items, such as:

Germany, for example, distinguishes between military Items and war weapons. All military Items are subject to a licence requirement for exports. However, some of these Items are also war weapons, which are subject to further restrictions under the German War Weapons Control Act.

In addition to dual-use and military Items, a number of other Items may be controlled under separate export control lists either at EU or Member State level.

By way of example, the EUs Anti-torture Regulation is a reflection of the EUs commitment to eradicate torture and the death penalty. The measures seek to prevent the trade in certain goods that could be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. The Regulation:

As a specific example of the dynamic nature of export controls, during 2020 we also saw the introduction and subsequent removal of controls in relation to personal protective equipment, in response to the covid-19 pandemic. In 2021, export control restrictions in relation to the covid-19 vaccine were implemented and were in force until the end of 2021.

Within the EU, individual Member States are each responsible for licensing in respect of exports (whether in respect of EU-wide controls on dual-use Items, or national controls). There is no EU-wide export licensing body.

For example, in Germany, the central authority responsible for issuing licences is the Federal Office for Economic Affairs and Export Controls (BAFA). BAFA offers an online tool through which licences can be obtained and can assist in classifying goods. There are a number of very useful general export authorisations available in Germany, in addition to the EU-wide general export authorisations explained below.

Different types of licences may be available depending on the Item and transaction in question (including, in particular, the relevant destination). The EU Dual-Use Regulation sets out certain common forms for licences as follows:

Each licence covers exports of certain Items, to certain destinations, in some cases only to certain end users or consignees. In addition, each licence will have specific conditions, exclusions and requirements. These include obligations to obtain written undertakings from consignees or end users prior to export. For example, these undertakings can include certifications from the end user that they are the intended end user of the goods to be supplied by the licensee, and that the goods will not be used for any purpose connected with chemical, biological or nuclear weapons, or missiles capable of delivering those types of weapons. It is critical for exporters to ensure full compliance with the terms of any export licence. This is a typical area of non-compliance, with authorities in the EU commonly conducting audits in which they scrutinise exports for compliance with all licence conditions.

Certain licences may only be granted when the EU exporter can demonstrate that it has implemented an internal compliance programme (i.e., sufficient export compliance policies and procedures). Again, export authorities may audit exporters to determine whether appropriate policies and procedures are in place. In 2019, the European Commission made specific recommendations in respect of the key elements it would expect to see in an internal compliance programme, which include the following:

Under the EU Dual-Use Regulation, the relevant export licence must be obtained by the exporter from the Member State authority in which it is established (e.g., where it is incorporated) or, if the exporter is established outside the EU, by the competent authority of the Member State where the Items are located. A licence granted in one EU Member State should be valid for exports from any other Member State (although certain local restrictions can apply in practice). The exporter is currently defined to include (in summary):

Determining which entity is the exporter, and in which EU Member State it is established (and thus from which Member States competent authority the relevant export licence must be obtained), is a key matter that is not always straightforward in more complex supply chains. Different Member States can also take different approaches to the concept of establishment.

The EU has in place an enforcement coordination mechanism with a view to establish direct cooperation and exchange of information between competent authorities and enforcement agencies. However, the implementation and enforcement of export controls in the EU is also the responsibility of individual EU Member States. The EU Dual-Use Regulation states that each Member State shall take appropriate measures to ensure proper enforcement, including penalties that are effective, proportionate and dissuasive.

Penalties for breaches of export controls can include civil or criminal penalties, or broader legal and practical consequences, varying by jurisdiction. Typical penalties may involve:

More broadly, export violations may damage an exporters relationships with relevant licensing authorities, potentially hampering the ability to obtain export licences in the future (which can significantly affect business activities). Export violations may also damage relationships with banks and other counterparties and key stakeholders, as well as a companys reputation.

Read the rest here:
The Guide to Sanctions - Third Edition - Global Investigations Review