Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

Why Democrats Are Losing the Working Class

TIME Politics 2016 Election Why Democrats Are Losing the Working Class Getty Images Hint: they don't vote.

Its true that wealthier Americans tend to vote for Republicans and that the less well-off tend to vote for Democrats. And its true that, in theory, such a demographic breakdown would be good for Dems. After all, in raw numbers, there are moremany, many times moreworking-class Americans than there are folks at the top of the income pyramid.

The problem, as Democrats well know, is that it doesnt much matter who the working class supports if they dont show up to vote. And theres the rub.

According to a Pew Research Center study released today, the least financially secure Americans, despite being significantly more likely to back Democrats, tend to opt out of the political system altogether.

While 94% of the the most financially secure Americans were registered to vote, only 54% of the least financially secure were, according to the study. Even fewer actually make it to their polling booths. While 2014 voting records are not yet available, in 2010, 69% of the most financially secure cast ballots, while just 30% of the least financially secure did, according to Pew.

The least financially secure Americans also tended to avoid other aspects of the political system as well, the study found. Working class Americans called and wrote to their representatives at much lower rates than their richer neighbors, and paid much less attention to basic facts in national politics. Roughly 60% of the most financially secure Americans could correctly identify the parties in control of the House and Senate when the study was conducted before the 2014 midterm; just 26% of the least financially secure could do the same.

These findings will not come as much of a surprise to Democrats, who were trounced in last years mid-term election in part because so few peopleand particularly those at the lower end of the income spectrumactually turned up to vote. In November, less than half of eligible voters showed up at the polls in 43 states, marking the lowest voter turnout on record in 72 years.

While voter turnout generally increases during presidential election years, and is therefore likely to tick up again in 2016, low voter turnout remains a huge problem for Democrats efforts not only to win over but also collect votes from the American working class.

Thats one reason they have been committed to making it easier for all Americans to vote. Working-class folks, who tend to have less flexible hours at work, vote disproportionately more in states that allow early voting and mail-in ballotsmeasures that are overwhelmingly supported by Democrats. In Colorado, for example, which began allowing mail-in ballots saw much, much higher turnout in 2014 than itd had in 2010. Oregon and Washington, which also allow for mail-in ballots, had turnout rates that were higher than average in 2014, too. In North Carolina, where early voting measures allowed people to go to the polls over the course of seven days also helped increase voter turnout in that state by 35% from where it was in 2010.

The Pew study was based on data collected from a nationally representative panel of 3,154 adults, who were surveyed online and by mail between Sept. 9 and Oct. 3, 2014. The survey determined respondents financial security by asking about their difficult paying bills, whether they receive government aid, and whether they had access to financial assets and tools, like bank accounts and retirement savings.

Excerpt from:
Why Democrats Are Losing the Working Class

John Fugelsang: Democrats underestimate Mike Huckabee at their peril – Video


John Fugelsang: Democrats underestimate Mike Huckabee at their peril
John Fugelsang has a message for Democrats. Mike Huckabee is one of the GOP most effective communicators. He said he is an evangelist who knows how to lie to people.

By: Egberto Willies

Read the original post:
John Fugelsang: Democrats underestimate Mike Huckabee at their peril - Video

Topic: The Democrats in California split into factions, (voice) – Video


Topic: The Democrats in California split into factions, (voice)
Listen today about new interesting topic - The Democrats in California split into factions,. *---*---*---*---*---*---*---*---*---*--*---*---*---* Check out more exciting topics to verify...

By: Funnypedia

More here:
Topic: The Democrats in California split into factions, (voice) - Video

21st Century Democrats: Rawlings-Blake on Dems’ Strategy; Altman on Social Security’s Future – Video


21st Century Democrats: Rawlings-Blake on Dems #39; Strategy; Altman on Social Security #39;s Future
First, Stephanie Rawlings-Blake is the mayor of Baltimore and an up-and-coming force in the Democratic Party. She says the party #39;s dismal showing in 2014 resulted from not talking about Democrats...

By: 21stdems

Here is the original post:
21st Century Democrats: Rawlings-Blake on Dems' Strategy; Altman on Social Security's Future - Video

Democrats' bill would ban paid prioritization by ISPs

Democrats in the U.S. Congress have wasted no time in resurrecting a debate over net neutrality rules, with lawmakers introducing a bill that would ban paid traffic priority agreements between broadband providers and Web content producers.

A day after new members of Congress were seated, Democrats on Wednesday introduced a bill in both the House of Representatives and the Senate that would require the U.S. Federal Communications Commission to ban paid prioritization agreements. The FCC is preparing to vote on new net neutrality rules in late February, after an appeals court threw out a large portion of the agencys old rules a year ago.

The reintroduced Online Competition and Consumer Choice Act, which failed to pass after Democrats introduced it last year, is designed to prevent broadband providers from creating Internet fast lanes and slow lanes, based on the ability of Web content providers and services to pay for faster speeds, sponsors said.

The primary sponsors of the bill are Senator Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat, and Representative Doris Matsui, a California Democrat. Other co-sponsors include six Democratic representatives, three Democratic senators, and independent Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont.

The Internet must be a platform for free expression and innovation, and a place where the best ideas and services can reach consumers based on merit rather than based on a financial relationship with a broadband provider, Leahy said in a statement. The Online Competition and Consumer Choice Act would protect consumers and sets out important policy positions that the FCC should adopt.

FCC rules must ensure there are no tolls, gatekeepers, or a two-tiered Internet system in this country, Matsui added in a statement.

Republicans now hold the majority in both the House and the Senate, and many have voiced opposition to strong net neutrality regulations. While the Democrats bill is unlikely to pass, it puts political pressure on the FCC to ban paid prioritization. An early proposal by FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler would have allowed broadband providers to engage in commercially reasonable traffic management and, in limited cases, sign traffic prioritization deals.

The bill would require the FCC to prohibit paid prioritization agreements on the last-mile Internet connection, the connection between the ISP and the consumer. It would also prohibit broadband providers from prioritizing its own last-mile Internet traffic over the traffic of other companies.

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for the IDG News Service, and is based in Washington, D.C. More by Grant Gross

Your message has been sent.

Read this article:
Democrats' bill would ban paid prioritization by ISPs