Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

Can Sherrod Brown’s plan save the Democrats? – Cincinnati.com

Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio(Photo: J. Scott Applewhite, J. Scott Applewhite, AP)

WASHINGTONSen. Sherrod Brownunveiled a set of populist, pro-worker policies on Friday that he says could strengthen the middle class, increase wages, and serve as a blueprint for Democrats as his party searches for ways to reconnect with working-class voters.

In a speech Friday in Columbus, the Ohio Democrat called for a dramatic shift to the political left on a series of economic and labor issues including stronger collective bargaining rights for workers, creating a national paid leave fund, and requiring corporate freeloaders to reimburse taxpayers if low-wage employees have to rely on federal assistance to make ends meet.

We need to change the way we think about the American economy, Brown said in remarks delivered at Ohio State University.

The view that businesses drive the American economy and that helping corporations by extension help workers has been discredited, Brown argued. Its not businesses who drive the economy its workers, he said.

Browns proposals, spelled out in a 77-page proposal full of footnotes and graphics, are not likely to go anywhere in the current Republican-controlled Congress. But his ideas could serve as a rallying point for Democrats as they gear up for the 2018 election, when Brown and others will be on the ballot.

They could also serve as fodder for Brown's GOP opponents, who may seize on his new platform as out of themainstream.Even before Brown began his speech, a Republican opposition research group attacked it as bad for the economy and a sop to his liberal base.

By pushing rejected ideas that would eliminate hundreds of thousands of jobs and penalize entrepreneurs, Browns proposal is only meant to curry favor to his liberal, special interest donors, said Jeremy Adler, a spokesman for America Rising Squared, a GOP group that does not disclose its donors.

In a document dubbed Working Too Hard for Too Little, Brown broadly calls for changes in four areas:

--Increasing workers wages and benefits, including raising the minimum wage to $15 per hour and providing employees with 12 weeks of paid family and medical leave.

--Giving workers greater bargaining power and cracking down businesses that misclassify workers as independent contractors or that deny workers overtime pay.

--Helping workers save for retirement, by offering tax credits to match retirement contributions and expanding retirement programs for part-time and hourly workers.

--Encouraging companies to invest in their workforce by giving them a tax break if they commit to staying in the U.S. and providing good wages and benefits to employees.

"I can accept that the workforce is changing. But what we cannot accept is that more and more of our workers are paid less and have little economic security," Brown said. "We need to update our economic policies, our retirement policies, and our labor laws to reflect todays reality."

Read more:

Democrats' 'checklist' for attacking Trumponomics reflects 2016 lessons

Strange bedfellows: Will Brown and Trump join forces on trade?

In an interview before the speech, Brown said he began work on the proposal in 2015, well before Trump won the presidency, and he dismissed questions about whether it would serve as his campaign platform as he vies for a third term in the Senate. Brown is expected to face a tough re-election in a state that Trump won by 51 percent of the vote, compared to Democratic nominee Hillary Clintons 43 percent.

As he gears up for that race, Brown will have to walk a tightropewooing the blue-collar workers who supported Trump while not alienating his own liberal base. But in an interview Thursday, Brown said this was not a political pitch, noting he has long been focused on worker-related issues, such as raising the minimum wage.

Its not addressing Trump. Its not addressing Hillarys loss, Brown said. Its addressing what we do to empower workers, all workers.

Still, Brown conceded that his ideas could serve as a roadmap for his own party, as Democrats look for a way out of the political wilderness and come to grips with their stunning 2016 election losses. Brown said he also plans to share his proposal with the White House, noting that Trump won in part because of his populist pitch to working-class voters in Ohio and across the country.

I hope anybody steals these ideas and moves forward, whether its Secretary of Treasury (Steven) Mnuchin or whether its Tom Perez, the newly elected chairman of the Democratic National Committee, Brown said. I want it talked about. I want people to try to move that agenda.

Read more:

Josh Mandel plans another U.S. Senate bid

Democrats elect Tom Perez, former Labor secretary, as new party leader

Here are some of Brown's specific proposals:

*Require employers to provide workers with a minimum of seven paid sick says;

*Create a national "paid leave fund," paid for via employee and employer payroll contributions, to provide workers with 12 weeks of paid family or medical leave;

*Increase penalties against employers who discriminate against workers trying to form a union or who commit unfair labor practices'

*Require businesses to allow certain part-time workers to participate in thecompany's retirement plan; and

*Create a "corporate freeloader fee," levied against large corporations who pay poverty-level wages.

Read or Share this story: http://cin.ci/2lloirJ

See original here:
Can Sherrod Brown's plan save the Democrats? - Cincinnati.com

Democrats plumb election timeline for Trump-Russia clues – ABC News

As the number of documented contacts between Trump campaign aides and Russian officials grows, congressional investigators are increasingly looking at the events that occurred around those meetings to determine if they provide evidence of a Russian influence campaign.

Whether there was any collusion there is of keen interest to our committee, said Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee. This could all be coincidence or could be collusion.

Trump has continually denied lingering allegations that associates of his campaign had been in contact with the Russians. In a Feb. 16 news conference, Trump underlined previous denials, saying, "I have nothing to do with Russia. I told you, I have no deals there, I have no anything," and said that "the news is fake."

Senior Republican leaders in Washington have said they remain unconvinced the timeline points to anything out of the ordinary.

We have seen no evidence from any of these ongoing investigations that anybody in the trump campaign or the trump team was involved in any of this, House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) told ABC Newss Mary Bruce. We've been presented with no evidence that an American was colluding with the Russians to meddle in the election.

A key period that is gaining interest from investigators is July 2016, as the Republican National Convention got underway in Cleveland. On July 18, party insiders took the unusual step of altering the official GOP platform by watering down its position on the use of force to protect the Ukraine from Russian incursions.

The champagne corks were going off when that happened, said Paul Joyal, a Russian intelligence expert and managing director of National Strategies.

Two days later, on July 20, the Russian Ambassador to the United States surfaced in Cleveland, meeting at different points with then-Senator Sessions (R-AL) who served as a campaign advisor and now as Trump's Attorney General and with a one-time Trump foreign policy adviser named Carter Page. Page later denied any meeting had occurred, telling PBS Newshour, I had no meetings. No meetings.

That same week, on July 22, WikiLeaks posted the first of the hacked Democratic party e-mails.

July seems to be a key month, Schiff told ABC News.

Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) told ABC News he considered that month to be a turning point. He said investigators are likely to explore how hackers changed their approach to releasing stolen material.

The selective leaking of that information in a way that was I think initially just to throw chaos into the election but increasingly about mid-summer switched from let's just throw chaos into let's favor Mr. Trump at the expense of Hillary Clinton, Warner told ABC News.

He specifically noted the timing of leaks revealing Clinton campaign chairman John Podestas emails. The first of those leaks occurred just hours after Trump had suffered a public relations blow from the release of embarrassing hot mic recordings of Trump on the Access Hollywood entertainment program in 2005.

That was more than coincidence, Warner said.

Schiff cautioned that it remains far too soon to draw any conclusions.

I see as my responsibility is to follow the facts wherever they lead, Schiff said.

ABC News' Cho Park, Alex Hosenball and Paul Blake contributed to this report.

More:
Democrats plumb election timeline for Trump-Russia clues - ABC News

President Trump Hits Back at Democrats With Photo of Chuck Schumer and Vladimir Putin – TIME

Amid growing calls from Democrats for an investigation into the Trump administration 's ties to Russia , the President tweeted an old photo of Chuck Schumer with Vladimir Putin and called the top Senate Democrat a "hypocrite."

"We should start an immediate investigation into @ SenSchumer and his ties to Russia and Putin. A total hypocrite!" Trump tweeted Friday afternoon, with an accompanying photo of Schumer and the Russian president eating doughnuts together.

The photo is from Putin's 2003 trip to New York for the opening of a Russian gas companys station, The Hill reports .

Schumer fired back on Twitter, writing, "Happily talk re: my contact w Mr. Putin & his associates, took place in '03 in full view of press & public under oath. Would you &your team?"

The online spat comes after revelations that Attorney General Jeff Sessions met with the Russian ambassador to the U.S. twice in 2016, which he did not disclose during his confirmation hearing. Sessions said Thursday he would recuse himself from any investigations into the Trump campaign, but he denies any wrongdoing in meeting with Russia. Still, the disclosure fanned the fire under Schumer and other Democrats calling for an independent probe into Trump's relationship with Russia.

"We have an obligation to get to the truth," Schumer said in a press conference Thursday calling for an independent prosecutor to conduct an investigation. "We must evaluate the scope of Russia's interference in our elections and assess if agents of their government have penetrated to the highest level of our government. Nothing less than the sanctity of our dear democratic process, the primacy of rule of law, and the integrity of our executive branch is at stake."

Follow this link:
President Trump Hits Back at Democrats With Photo of Chuck Schumer and Vladimir Putin - TIME

Celebrity Democrats Fuck Off – Deadspin

The face of populism: Getty

We have just witnessed the incredible spectacle of a vile right-wing celebrity being elected President of the United States. There is a right lessonand a wrong one!for Democrats to take from this.

The Democratic party is in the process of deciding whether it will be the primary home of The Resistance, or its normal bumbling, triangulating mess. Hard choice! On one hand, there are millions and millions of Americans angry at our incipient slide into white nationalism and looking for a place to direct their newfound political energy; on the other hand, when you talk to Bill Clinton, he really makes you feel like youre the only in the whole room.

There are a million small, technical things that establishment Democrats can, if they so choose, blame their election loss on: the media, James Comey, a weak ground game in Midwestern states, etcetera. This impulse to attribute the loss to small things that can be changed relatively easy is a powerful one, because it absolves the party as a whole from scrutiny. In this scenario, its not that the Democratic party is moribund and out of touch and the object of legitimate scorn from many voters whose lives have not improved for decades; its just that [MINOR TACTICAL THING].

If this is ultimately the lesson the party takes from this election, it is a missed opportunity. There is a reason why two anti-establishment outsiders, Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, did far better than expected: because people are mad that our political system is broken. We have a democracy that has been proven to operate like an oligarchy, favoring the interests of wealthy and powerfuland, consequently, we have a dying middle class and decades of rising inequality. Yes, the policies of the Republicans are to blame for a good deal of this. But the Democrats are supposed to be the party that stopped all this from happening. They failed. In many instances, they were complicit. There is no arguing with the fact that the establishment is what got us to where we are today. That is why the Democrats must change. And that change must be a leftward push towards economic equality, social equality, and, most importantly, towards building a democracy that functions in the way that democracies shouldby distributing power to everyone, not letting it be controlled by the few.

This is what the Democratic party should have taken away from their devastating election loss. But of course, there is no guarantee that they did. If the Democrats are able to blame their loss on small, controllable tactical errors, they are then free to conclude that their path to victory lies in more of the same. This mindstatewhich allows the establishment to just continue doing what it doeswas powerful enough to defeat Keith Ellisons bid to lead the DNC. The establishment did not get to where they are by accident.

Nothing embodies this Democratic tendency to run away from left wing populism at top speed better than its worshipful embrace of political celebrity. We are already hearing the terrifying whispers. Chelsea Clinton may run for office (perhaps against Caroline Kennedy?). Perhaps Hillary Clinton will make a run for New York City mayor. Andrew Cuomo is exploring a 2020 presidential bid. John Kerry wont rule out another run, either. And hey, political celebs not big enough for you? Maybe the Democrats will run Mark Cuban! Or George Clooney! Or Oprah!!!

Do you know why so many people are unenthusiastic about the Democratic party? Because the Democrats dont fucking do what theyre supposed to do. They are supposed to be the party of the oppressed. They are supposed to fight for the little guy. They are supposed to represent the poor, and the downtrodden, and the marginalized. Instead, they fawn over political dynasties and search madly for our own rich and famous people to counteract the rich and famous people of the other side. They are supposed to be opening doors for people who have never had the chance to be rich, or famous; instead, they are busy creating their own team of celebrities and billionairesbut ours are nice.

That is what the other side does. We are actually against that, you see. We are not supposed to copying that.

Bernie Sanders and Pope Francis were both shocks to their respective institutions, because they both at least tried to make those institutions act in accordance with their stated values. But it is hard to make the church give up its golden chalices, and it is hard to make the Democrats give up the Clintons and the Kennedys. Speaking as one of the (majority of) Americans who would not care to see our country slide into fascism, I would like to urge the Democratic establishment to think about why you are where you are. Not to meet Oprah, nor to be introduced to the infinite network of insider connections. You are there to help people who need help.

If necessary, we can spend the next four years prying the hands of celebrity Democrats off of the levers of power, but thats not the most efficient use of time. It would be better for everyone if they politely wrote the checks and fucked off. Clintonistas and zillionaire politico-tourists and Hollywood stars: be good soldiers, and hold the door open for people who actually care about issues on your way out.

Continue reading here:
Celebrity Democrats Fuck Off - Deadspin

Key Republicans Ask Jeff Sessions to Recuse Himself in Russia Case – New York Times


NBCNews.com
Key Republicans Ask Jeff Sessions to Recuse Himself in Russia Case
New York Times
WASHINGTON Congressional Republicans began breaking ranks on Thursday to join Democrats in demanding that Attorney General Jeff Sessions recuse himself from overseeing an investigation into contacts between the Trump campaign and the ...
Republicans turn up heat on SessionsCNN
Democrats Demand Attorney General Jeff Sessions Resign Over Russian MeetingsNBCNews.com
White House defends Sessions as Dems seek resignation over Russia revelationFox News
Reuters -AL.com -TheBlaze.com -Washington Post
all 1,480 news articles »

See the rest here:
Key Republicans Ask Jeff Sessions to Recuse Himself in Russia Case - New York Times