Mediaboss Marketing

Some high-profile Democrats still aren't saying if they'll attend a March 3 congressional address by Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu amid a partisan debate over whether the speech represents a breach of protocol.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California and Dick Durbin of Illinois both told reporters Wednesday that they're considering skipping the speech, accusing Republicans and Netanyahu of using the address for political gain.

"I've heard some colleagues are very concerned by it, and I'm troubled by it," Durbin said. "I just think it's a serious mistake by the Speaker and by the Prime Minister."

House Speaker John Boehner extended the invitation to Netanyahu without consulting the White House, which administration officials say was a breach of long-standing protocol. President Barack Obama will not meet with the prime minister while he is in the United States because of the visit's close proximity to the Israeli election.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Wednesday that Vice President Joe Biden's schedule is not yet set for the week of the speech.

At the Capitol, Feinstein said that she's concerned that the speech will not only be seen as bad form within the United States but that it could be bad for Israel.

"My concern is that it's obviously political and it uses the backdrop of the United States House of Representatives and the Senate, and the House, two weeks before a political campaign and violates all the protocol that's always existed in terms of working this out with the President," Feinstein told reporters. "And I don't think that helps Israel."

Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer was on the Hill Wednesday morning meeting with a handful of Jewish House Democrats. And Israeli Speaker Yuli-Yoel Edelstein met separately with House leaders from both sides of the aisle.

Other Democrats have confirmed that they will attend the address, although some say that's not an indication that they support Boehner's move to invite the prime minister unilaterally.

Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi has called Boehner's invite to Netanyahu "not appropriate" and said it "could send the wrong message in terms of giving diplomacy a chance" in regards to Iran.

Link:
Some Democrats Mull Skipping Netanyahu Address

WichitaLiberty.TV: Wichita Eagle, Kansas Democrats, Kris Kobach on voting, and the minimum wage.
In this episode of WichitaLiberty.TV: Wichita Eagle labels hold a clue to the newspaper #39;s attitude, Kansas Democratic Party income tax reckoning, straight-ti...

By: Bob Weeks

Read the original:
WichitaLiberty.TV: Wichita Eagle, Kansas Democrats, Kris Kobach on voting, and the minimum wage. - Video

Democrats Against Governor Walker #39;s Budget Proposals
Democrats Against Governor Walker #39;s Budget Proposals.

By: nbc26

Read the original:
Democrats Against Governor Walker's Budget Proposals - Video

Senate Democrats are falling back in love with the filibuster.

After eight years of complaining about obstructionism, the Senates new Democratic minority is embracing some of the same tools Republicans had wielded so skillfully to jam the legislative machinery. On Tuesday, Democrats used the filibuster to stop a bill that would fund the Department of Homeland Security and roll back President Barack Obamas immigration policies dead in its tracks.

Story Continued Below

Democrats relationship with the filibuster had been on the rocks when they ran the Senate, a time when the GOP regularly used the procedural weapon to disrupt the majoritys agenda. Democrats responded by gutting the filibuster on nominations, making Republican obstruction a go-to explanation for the Senates gridlock and complaining bitterly when the GOP minority blocked debate from even opening on bills.

Then came Tuesdays 51-48 vote blocking the DHS bill. This was the first time a Democratic minority had blocked a bill from coming to the floor for debate since Aug. 3, 2006, when Democrats stifled legislation that would have raised the minimum wage and decreased the estate tax.

Casual Senate watchers could be forgiven for thinking that Democrats and Republicans had simply exchanged talking points after the 2014 election. Now in the majority, Republicans are the ones accusing the minority of keeping the Senate from getting things done.

Theyre refusing to debate a bill theyd like to change, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said of the Democrats. He added: Its rather an, honestly, absurd position. Im glad I didnt have to come out here and make that argument with you all, because I think its a pretty hard argument to make with a straight face.

McConnell, who had made countless procedural arguments against Democratic legislation during his stewardship of the minority, said Democrats instead should allow debate on the bill and offer amendments.

More filibusters may come in a matter of days if Republicans follow through on their threats to make Democrats repeatedly reject the DHS-immigration proposal. It appears Democrats will block any attempt to bring a DHS funding bill with riders to the floor.

Democrats have always supported keeping the filibuster for legislation, leaving it in place even when they gutted the 60-vote threshold on executive branch nominations in 2013. Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) set out this year prepared to use the procedural tool to parry aside legislation that his caucus broadly opposed and the DHS and its immigration policies fit the bill perfectly.

Original post:
Democrats learn to love the filibuster

Maryland Democrats, demoralized by their partys losses in November, have found a rallying cry: protect education spending.

Senior members of the House and the Senate joined the states largest teachers union at its headquarters in Annapolis on Tuesday to protest a budget proposal by Gov. Larry Hogan (R) that would curb planned funding of k-12 education in the coming fiscal year.

It is important for us never to cut back on our commitment to education, House Speaker Michael E. Busch (D-Anne Arundel) said at the packed event, at which the Maryland State Education Association unveiled a Web site where parents can see the potential impact of Hogans proposals on classrooms in their county.

Prince Georges County, for example, would get $6,909.92 less per classroom next year than expected, according to the Web site, which features a play on Hogans Change Maryland campaign slogan. The altered version: Dont Shortchange Maryland.

The news conference followed weeks of debate among Democrats over how to stand up to a Republican governor who prevailed at the polls by promising tax cuts and calling for spending restraint. It came a day before Hogan is scheduled to deliver his first State of the State address, which aides say will call for bipartisan cooperation in Annapolis and lay out the governors legislative agenda.

Hogan has stressed that his budget proposal still calls for record spending on K-12 education, even though counties would receive $144 million less next year than under current spending formulas.

We actually increased spending on education, Hogan said during a radio interview last week, in which he seemed on the defensive. We just didnt increase at the rate that people would like us to and that we would like to, frankly.

The governors aides pressed the same point Tuesday in e-mails and interviews, and noted that Hogan proposed spending $290 million next year on public school construction, roughly on par with levels of recent years under a Democratic governor.

We disagree that there are cuts, Hogans budget secretary, David Brinkley, told reporters in the basement of the State House. Brinkley said it is crucial to get spending under control following a period of escalating borrowing by the state, and said Hogan made some tough decisions in order to close an inherited $800 million shortfall.

While Hogan voters are likely to appreciate those considerations, Democratic lawmakers could get some traction with the public by standing up for education spending, some analysts said.

Read more here:
As budget battle heats up in Annapolis, Democrats rally around schools funding