Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

Meet the tech-savvy activists trying to take over the Democratic Party – The Verge

In the aftermath of the 2016 election, several alums of the Bernie Sanders campaign came together with media entrepreneurs from The Young Turks to chart their path forward. Disappointed with the performance of a Democratic Party they felt had chosen a too-centrist position, they decided to seek out and promote candidates from the left using some of the distributed organizing tools that had helped the Sanders campaign punch above its weight.

The group, called Justice Democrats, advocates for policy positions such as Medicare for all, regulating Wall Street, ending the failed war on drugs, and bringing about election reform, according to their platform. Meanwhile the group proposes electing individuals to replace corporate Democrats, and has criticized Cory Booker, Claire McCaskill, and other US senators on Twitter as #DemsVotingBadly.

These tools helped the Sanders campaign turn this digital grassroots media support into $33 million raised in three months alone

The Justice Democrats plan to organize in what executive director Saikat Chakrabarti calls a distributed fashion. As the director of Organizing Technology for the Sanders campaign, Chakrabarti worked alongside Justice Democrats co-founder Zach Exley and communications director Corbin Trent to create software to organize grassroots support. Among the platforms they pioneered was map.berniesanders.com, a tool which allowed volunteers to organize events, with planned events appearing on a map for other interested volunteers to locate. Volunteers organized nearly 60,000 campaign events using this software, according to Exley. The tech they developed also allowed for these teams of volunteers to organize without direct supervision from campaign staff, while being on call to assist in official field operations when needed.

These tools helped the Sanders campaign turn this digital grassroots media support into $33 million raised in three months alone. Internet-based campaigns tend to fail to achieve their objectives when they cant leverage the full capacity of all the people who raise their hands and say I want to be involved, Exley told The Nation.

The Justice Democrats are partnering with Brand New Congress, a similar endeavor aimed at electing non-career politicians in both major parties by using grassroots support. Their policy goals include getting money out of politics and investing trillions of dollars to rebuild and repair towns. The group, which intends to be a consolidated resource and fundraising entity for all of its candidates, shares many of its members with Justice Democrats, including Chakrabarti, Exley, and Trent.

I think that our ability to organize with technology and our ability to set up phone banks and distribute in an effective way is going to allow us to nationalize more effectively.

While Justice Democrats is still developing their own versions of these strategies and has not had much of an opportunity to put them into play yet they formed in January and just announced Cori Bush as their first candidate Cenk Uygur, the CEO of The Young Turk Network and a Justice Democrats co-founder, has already started to use his platform to promote the group. His show alone has over 3 million subscribers, with The Young Turks Network drawing in 80 million unique views monthly and being the most-watched online network among 1834 year olds, according to Esquire.

Our goal is to nationalize those races and to really frame a narrative around these representatives that they arent just representing their district, which is a very big part of it, but theyre also representing the rest of America with their votes, Trent said in an interview with The Verge. So I think that our ability to organize with technology and our ability to set up phone banks and distribute in an effective way is going to allow us to nationalize more effectively. And then hopefully thatll be something that supports the field operations on the ground of those candidates in those districts.

On their website, Justice Democrats is soliciting nominations directly from supporters, and have so far received over 8,000 potential candidates. Many of these nominees, who may also be nominated by a team of Justice Democrats researchers, have little experience in the political process.

They may be civil engineers, they may be activists, they may be nurses, they may be librarians or teachers or principals, but they dont necessarily have the skills to run a winning campaign, Trent said. Chakrabarti says theyre looking for people with a good life record, such as participating in various forms of activism, or just being well-liked community members.

The group had garnered 217,651 supporters and raised a little over $1 million by mid-March, just two months after they launched

In order to address the lack of political experience, they have established a vetting process that includes a candidate training program and interviews with the Justice Democrats leadership, according to Trent. At least 70 individuals have gone through the process. Among the nominees that the Justice Democrats and Brand New Congress have publicly endorsed are Ronjonette Harrison, a foster mom and social worker in New Yorks 26th congressional district, and Chardo Richardson, ACLU president of Central Florida and an Air Force veteran.

So far, one candidate has officially taken up the cause of Brand New Congress and Justice Democrats: Cori Bush, a teacher, nurse, civil rights organizer, and preacher who ran for US Senate in 2016, and is now running to represent Missouris 1st congressional district in the US House of Representatives. Justice Democrats initially tweeted their support for her on March 13th, and she was announced as a Justice Democrats / Brand New Congress joint candidate running as a Democrat on April 20th. They initially aimed to raise $10,000 by her launch rally on April 30th to get access to the voter file they need to contact voters, soliciting $3 and $7 donations in emails to supporters. By April 24th, however, they had already raised $20,000, and succeeded in getting the file.

But their goals of beating establishment Democrats and electing a new slate of candidates necessitated aggressive fundraising and organizing. The group had garnered 217,651 supporters and raised a little over $1 million by mid-March, just two months after they launched, but Chakrabarti says it costs about $1 million to run competitively in a congressional race.

Right now, theres one basic path to Congress for candidates, and that path goes through big donors and PACs and lobbyists and were trying to create an alternative path.

If Bernie can raise $232 million in a primary, we think if we can raise somewhere around a little bit more than that for primary season that we can be competitive, says Trent.

The group is working on growing their slate of candidates in hopes of eventually running in over 300 races, further developing their platform, and growing their infrastructure of distributed teams and campaign staff, according to Trent. A large focus of their endeavors, however, will be fundraising.

One of the biggest things that weve got to do is provide an alternative source of fundraising, Trent said. Right now, theres one basic path to Congress for candidates, and that path goes through big donors and PACs and lobbyists and were trying to create an alternative path.

The teams next major project is launching the campaigns of eight more candidates with Brand New Congress, the identities of which they have not yet disclosed, other than that they are from states including New York, Florida, Arkansas, and West Virginia. Theyre looking to raise $187,574 to buy voter files for the candidates, and they plan on accomplishing that goal by continuing to solicit small donations. They also plan to use their tech-based strategies to run a presidential style campaign in these congressional races, which Trent says allows them to mobilize people from New York to California and everywhere in between to be impactful in campaigns they generally wouldnt even be aware of, let alone be able to be involved in.

We saw this campaign that was grassroots fueled, Chakrabarti said regarding the Sanders campaign when Justice Democrats first launched. Were going to do that same thing, but were going to take it forward to Congress.

Read more:
Meet the tech-savvy activists trying to take over the Democratic Party - The Verge

Democrats take on Trump over court vacancies – Politico

With his nomination Monday of 10 conservative judges to the federal courts, President Donald Trump is reviving the long-running judicial wars with Democrats. And the two picks likely to rankle Democrats the most are the ones they have the most leverage to block.

Senate Democrats have few powers to prevent judges from getting confirmed to their lifetime appointments, due to rules changes they pushed through in 2013 that eliminated the 60-vote threshold for nearly all nominations. But Democratic senators can wage a silent filibuster of sorts against nominees from their home states through the so-called blue-slip process.

Story Continued Below

Two of the 10 judicial nominees the White House unveiled on Monday were on Trumps short list of potential Supreme Court justices during the campaign: Michigan Supreme Court Justice Joan Larsen, who will be nominated to the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, and Justice David Stras, who sits on the Minnesota Supreme Court and is Trumps pick for the 8th Circuit.

Minnesota and Michigan are each represented by two Democratic senators. That gives Amy Klobuchar and Al Franken, who hail from Minnesota, and Debbie Stabenow and Gary Peters of Michigan, what amounts to veto authority over the nominees, who are already drawing objections from other Democrats.

We know that there is a prized list now from [conservative] special interest groups and one of them is now on the Supreme Court, Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin, the second-ranking Senate Democrat, said Monday, referring to recently-confirmed Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch. If thats the way the president is going to choose the leaders of the judiciary, we need to ask some probing questions about why these special interest groups believe these particular judges are the best choices.

Of the blue-slip powers, Durbin added: As long as we have the authority, well use it if necessary.

In a statement, Franken said he was concerned Stras nomination was "the product of a process that relied heavily on guidance from far-right Washington, D.C.-based special interest groups rather than through a committee made up of a cross section of Minnesotas legal community." Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) accused Trump of continuing to outsource the judicial selection process to hard-right special interest groups rather than consulting with senators. Democrats have long been critical that Trump's Supreme Court short list was crafted with input from the conservative Heritage Foundation and Federalist Society.

A spokesman for Franken said the senator was not meaningfully consulted and that the White House declined the Franken's recommendations to fill the vacancy at the St. Louis-based appeals court. A separate Senate Democratic aide said the Trump administration notified, rather than consulted, the senators, declining to ask for input before announcing the nominee.

Lack of consultation on judicial nominees goes against traditional White House practice, said veterans of the nomination process.

In the Obama administration, people would not return their blue slips simply because they felt they werent consulted efficiently, said Christopher Kang, who served as deputy counsel to former President Barack Obama.

Kang, now the national director at the National Council of Asian Pacific Americans, said 17 judicial nominees during Obamas tenure were blocked because home-state senators declined to give approval, or return their blue slips to the Judiciary Committee.

Battles over judicial nominations are often caustic. But tensions have been especially high following the contentious battle to get Gorsuch installed at the Supreme Court and Trumps frequent attacks on the judiciary, particularly after judges produce rulings against his executive orders.

Mondays announcement of Trumps 10 conservative nominees came the same day that the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals considered the legality of Trumps revised travel ban.

Democrats will retain the blue-slip leverage, at least for now. A broad swath of Senate Republicans is opposed to doing away with the tradition, even as GOP senators blew up the old filibuster rules for Supreme Court nominees while they shepherded Gorsuch through to confirmation earlier this year.

Some prominent conservatives, such as radio host Hugh Hewitt, are urging Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) to ignore the century-old blue slip tradition. But Grassley said he plans to abide by it.

In addition to Grassley, more than a half-dozen other Republicans on the judiciary panel said in interviews that they have no plans to ditch blue slips. That's the case even though doing so would allow Trump to more easily install conservative judges, particularly in states with two Democratic senators.

Thats been the traditions of the Senate, that home-state senators have a say, said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a senior member of the committee. Im not about to give up my rights as a senator to have a say about district court judges wholl represent my constituents long after the presidents gone.

Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn, who has 11 district court vacancies in his home state of Texas, along with two empty appellate court seats, called the blue slip an equal opportunity irritant.

When its an impediment, then people dont like it. When its helpful, people like it, Cornyn said. What it does [is], it provokes a negotiation, which I dont think is an altogether bad thing.

Sign up for POLITICO Huddle. A daily play-by-play of congressional news in your inbox.

By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Sens. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), John Kennedy (R-La.) and Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) offered a similar defense of the practice.

We used it effectively myself with Sen. [John] McCain to negotiate with the Obama administration on judges, Flake said. I like that tradition.

Trump inherited a significantly higher number of lower-court vacancies than his two immediate predecessors, handing him a significant opportunity to reshape the federal judiciary for generations. Obama faced about 50 lower court vacancies, while President George W. Bush inherited about 80 open judgeships.

For that, Trump largely has Mitch McConnell to thank. During the Kentucky Republicans first two years as majority leader, only 20 district and circuit court judges were confirmed by the Senate, marking the slowest pace of judicial confirmations by the chamber in more than six decades.

Before Monday, Trump had nominated just one candidate for the 129 vacancies currently hampering the federal judiciary: Amul Thapar to the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, a sitting federal judge who coasted through his 90-minute confirmation hearing in late April.

Even with the announcement of the new nominees, other Republicans are eager for the Trump White House to send more candidates for the judiciary, particularly for vacancies in their home states.

Were concerned, said Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), a senior member of the Judiciary Committee. There is one judicial vacancy in Utah, which has been open since 2014. Weve already made our suggestions. They know that were interested in getting that taken care of.

Missing out on the latest scoops? Sign up for POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news, every morning in your inbox.

More here:
Democrats take on Trump over court vacancies - Politico

The Democrats aren’t being honest about health care – Washington Post (blog)

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and House Minority Whip Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) on May 4 scolded House Republicans for passing a health-care bill aiming to revise the Affordable Care Act. (Reuters)

The Democrats and their allies in the media want you to believe two conflicting certainties about the recently passed House Republican health-care bill. First, they want you to think that this bill doesnt amount to anything that its not a victory for Trump, will never become law, and has been completely disregarded by the Senate. Second, they want you to think that Republicans repeal-and-replace bill is a catastrophic development for the GOP and the nation that it will cost Republicans their majority, is certainly political suicide for the party as a whole, and is already adversely affecting the health of many Americans. But the health-care bill simply cannot amount to nothing on the one hand and deal a fatal blow to the entire Republican Party and be a plague on the population on the other.

In listening toHouse and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and SenateMinority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), one is led to believe that the pain and suffering caused by the Republican health-care bill will be unbearable, that widows and orphans will be dropping like flies. Even former president Barack Obama took a break from his jet-setting, yacht-sailing life to prevailupon Congress the need to exercise political courage in not repealing Obamacare. The Democrats comments are just partisan spin meant to distract from the real story that liberals beloved Obamacare is falling apart.

Since the Houses successful repeal-and-replace vote, the liberal media has relentlessly supported Democrats most extreme pronouncements. Politicoembraced the warped narrative about the bills campaign consequences, publishing a story Saturday with the headlineObamacare repeal vote upends 2018 House landscape.

But buried deep in that story are wise words from veteran GOP strategist Curt Anderson, who appropriately noted, Those who think Republicans will be defeated because of this vote are either in a parallel universe, or have been asleep for the past seven years. The notion that Obamacare is suddenly popular and will be missed is a mirage that seems real during the fog of war, but will disappear as you get closer to it.

Hes right. Obamacare is not popular now, and it definitely was not popular in 2014 when Republicans took control over the House and Senate for the first time in eightyears. Just look at Mondays CNBC report indicating that 60 percent of small-business owners support a repeal of Obamacare. They are the engine of job creation in the United States, they understand how harmful Obamacare has been to business. Still, leave it to CNNs always predictable Don Lemon to argue that Obamacare is collapsing only because President Trump is causing uncertainty among insurers. Give me a break.

But the lefts deceptive outrage does not end with Democratic congressional leaders or Don Lemon. The award for the most pretentious, sappy and over-the-top production goes to Rep.Joe Kennedy (D-Mass.), whose speech on the House floor was edited by a liberal organization to include a solemn violin soundtrack. Im serious. Striking a made-for-bad-TV pose, Kennedy argued that the repeal of Obamacare rejects common humanity and continues the administrations calculated attempt to divide up our nation. And the New York Times Charles Blow similarly weighed in with the wild overstatement that [w]hatever eventually comes of the bill, the death threat it poses for many Americans may well be a death wish Republicans have just issued for their own careers.

Its all a tad too much.

When Republicans voted to repeal and replace Obamacare last week, they fulfilled a major campaign promise, advanced the presidents agenda, and demonstrated the partys commitment to addressing the concerns of struggling Americans and taking the foot of Obamacare off the neck of small businesses, even as the Democrats refused to come to the table.

I cant help but question whether Democrats really think people are buying the argument that Republicans dont just want take away your health care, but want you dead, too. Does the left really believe people are so gullible, so naive? Maybe they just dont have anything affirmative to say.

I think the left is dreading the prospect of seeing a strong Republican Party get its act together and keep its promise to repeal and replace Obamacare. And, if this is the debate they really want to have, the Democrats drama and faux anguish only serve to damage their credibility.

See the rest here:
The Democrats aren't being honest about health care - Washington Post (blog)

No deal: House Democrats blast Senate leadership for allegedly rejecting budget proposal – kfor.com


kfor.com
No deal: House Democrats blast Senate leadership for allegedly rejecting budget proposal
kfor.com
In recent weeks, Democrats and Republicans have been fighting over a variety of issues related to the budget deficit. This past weekend, it seemed that there was a budget deal in the works. However, Democratic lawmakers announced that the deal fell ...

and more »

Read this article:
No deal: House Democrats blast Senate leadership for allegedly rejecting budget proposal - kfor.com

Beyond Trump, Democrats are bitterly divided – Sacramento Bee


cleveland.com
Beyond Trump, Democrats are bitterly divided
Sacramento Bee
Democrats on Capitol Hill are unified in opposition to President Donald Trump, fighting against his Cabinet picks, Supreme Court nominee and, last week, his health care bill. But increasingly, the question is whether Democrats can show that same kind ...
Democrats remain in denial about their own failures and myopia: Marc A. Thiessen (Opinion)cleveland.com
Democrats, don't get too giddy about 2018CNN
Hillary Clinton Is Back. Should Democrats Be Worried? | New RepublicNew Republic
WND.com -Townhall -Twitchy
all 48 news articles »

Read more from the original source:
Beyond Trump, Democrats are bitterly divided - Sacramento Bee