Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

Democrats embrace some stupid ‘st’ – Washington Examiner

The Democratic National Committee is cashing in on its chairman's claim that Republicans don't "give a shit about people."

The committee's newly elected chief, Tom Perez, alleged last month that President Donald Trump and House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wisc., don't "give a shit" about Americans, particularly poor people. Rather than apologize for his salty remarks, teh DNC chairman has embraced them. He repeated the charge at a rally on April 17.

"Republican leaders and President Trump don't give a shit about the people they were trying to hurt," he told a crowd in Portland, Maine.

He added later in reference to the GOP budget, "They call it a skinny budget: I call it a shitty budget."

Oh brother.

The DNC followed its chairman's lead, and started selling "give a shit"-branded merchandise this week on its website. The group is selling a shirt for $30 that reads, "Democrats give a sh*t about people."

"Show Republicans that you give a sh*t with this American-made t-shirt," the site's description reads.

The speed with which the DNC has moved to capitalize on Perez's line, and the fact that it is actually seeking to cash in on his coarseness, suggests that this is not so much about being good and angry as it is about sending a carefully tailored message to angry grassroots supporters.

To put it more simply, the "give a shit" line is part of a routine. It's not authentic anger. It's about striking a pose that appeals to people who've been despondent since the Nov. 8 elections.

Perez's remarks have attracted the normal praise and condemnation one would expect for that sort of language.

The GOP, for its part, appeared offended by the foul-mouthed merchandise Wednesday morning, which is sort of amusing considering the president, a Republican, has been known to pepper his language with the occasional obscenity.

The DNC responded Wednesday to the GOP's tsk-tsk'ing with the following message, "Taking away health care from 24 million people is going low. Giving a shit about people is going high."

Can't you just feel the authenticity? Can't you just feel the genuine rage? Me neither.

See the article here:
Democrats embrace some stupid 'st' - Washington Examiner

Democrats’ ridiculous tax attack – New York Post

Two candidates run for president. Tweedledum and Tweedledee oppose the Pacific trade pact. Both favor legal immigration. They promise jobs and a strong defense. One big difference is Tweedledum releases her tax returns. Tweedledee refuses.

What do you know? Tweedledee wins in an electoral landslide.

One might think this fact would have caused a light to go off in the brain of Sen. Chuck Schumer and The New York Times. That they would see at least the possibility that voters might admire Donald Trumps refusal to be buffaloed on his tax returns or at least not care that he wont release it.

But no, the Democrats seem to be under the impression that it escaped the notice of the American voter that Trump is rich. Even though he campaigned in his personal gold-plated jumbo jet and lives in his own gilded tower on Fifth Avenue.

The Democrats reckon the voters are not only dumb but also blind.

They would have to be both to fall for the latest gambit, in which Democrats seem bound and determined to stake the future of their party on a campaign to force President Trump to release his tax returns.

In fairness, the left-leaning press is citing polls that give some comfort to Democratic strategists. But one would think that Nov. 8 would have taught the anti-Trump editors a thing or two about polls.

Schumer insists the Democrats are prepared to hold hostage a tax cut for the American people unless Trump releases his tax returns. If he doesnt release his returns, it is going to make it much more difficult to get tax reform done, is the way Schumer puts it.

Are the Democrats prepared to ride that barrel over the falls?

This started to gather real steam on the eve of the election, when the Times obtained some pages from Trumps 1995 tax return. The papers reporters concluded that a $916 million loss could have enabled the billionaire to avoid paying income taxes for years.

Trump himself boasted that legally avoiding taxes was a sign of smarts. The prospect, though, sent the Times into a terrible swivet. Its top economic columnist, David Leonhardt, called the president the countrys most notorious tax shirker.

The idea that Trump paid no taxes turned into a veritable left-wing meme. PolitiFact may have long since rated Hillary Clintons claim that Trump paid no federal taxes mostly false, but the Democrats ignored that.

Then last month, Rachel Maddow fetched up with part of a Trump tax return and discovered oops that in 2005 alone, Trump paid something like $38 million in taxes. It turns out Donald Trump didnt avoid income taxes for 18 years, after all, said the Washington Post headline.

Now Democrats are complaining that a big portion of the taxes they think Trump paid came from the alternative-minimum tax. Thats a Marxist mash-up that Uncle Sam uses against so-called rich people who dont owe anything under ordinary tax law.

The left is trying to make a megillah out of the fact that Trump supports ending the alternative-minimum tax. Hed be among those who might benefit, after all. Then again, too, so would huge numbers of long-suffering taxpayers.

In this sense, Trump is like Ronald Reagan. The Gipper, too, ran on a tax revolt. When he won, the Democrats didnt know what hit them. What Reagan knew is that inflation had pushed ordinary earners into brackets that had been meant for rich people.

Trump gets this about the alternative-minimum tax. It was originally aimed at a tiny handful of taxpayers. But data released by the Tax Policy Foundation show it now clobbers upwards of 5 million people and is headed to 6 million.

Could it be that Trump is just smarter than Chuck Schumer about all this?

My own belief is American voters admire Trump for his success in business. If the rest of us benefit from tax cuts, why should we care if he does, too? Why shouldnt he keep his personal affairs private if the law allows him to do so?

Trumps biggest ethical obligation is to deliver on his campaign promises of jobs and growth. Tax cuts for family businesses and corporations are the first logical move. Trump knows Schumer almost surely wouldnt support a tax cut anyway, no matter how many of his personal tax returns Trump released.

If he needs reminding, he can ask Tweedledee.

Follow this link:
Democrats' ridiculous tax attack - New York Post

Democrats turn to Sanders and his star power to rebuild the party – Washington Post

LOUISVILLE Earlier this week, before heading downstairs to speak to nearly 3,000 Kentuckians, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) reminisced about his 2016 presidential campaign. After he had gained steam, and his rallies had become arena-size events, he was struck by the difference between his crowds and those at Democratic Party fundraisers.

Wed have a rally with five or ten thousand young people out, a great deal of energy, Sanders said between bites of a steak sandwich. Then Id walk into a room and thered be a thousand people from the Democratic Party. You were in two different worlds one full of energy, one full of idealism. And the other, full of good people I dont mean to put them down who are the bedrock of the Democratic Party.

At that moment, Sanders was on the second day of a week-long, cross-country speaking tour with Democratic National Committee Chairman Thomas Perez. The DNC was picking up half the bill for the 12-seat chartered plane as well as the venues, including the downtown Louisville Palace.

As Sanders spoke, Perez was a block away, meeting with party leaders who like most Democratic leaders had backed Hillary Clinton for president. Later that evening, they would take a stage and praise Sanders, who is not a Democrat, for reinvigorating their party. A chairman who defeated Sanderss preferred candidate to run the DNC was now touring as his opening act.

Our values are aligned on so many of the critical issues that confront the nation and the Democratic Party, Perez said in an interview. When people actually look at the platform of the Democratic Party theyll say, We need community college! well, look at the platform. When they say, We need a $15 minimum wage look at the platform.

The first 24 hours of the tour revealed both the strength and the seams in the strategy. It began in Portland, Maine, on Monday evening, where a crowd wrapped around the State Theatre to see the Come Together, Fight Back tour. Maines Democratic Party leaders flitted through the crowds with clipboards, encouraging fans of Sanders to sign up.

[Republicans avoid big loss by forcing runoff in Ga. House race]

They had competition. A group of rogue Berniecrats had brought clipboards of their own, with petitions encouraging the senator to run for president in 2020 as an independent. When the rally began, a mention of Perez was met with boos audible over mild applause; the loudest heckling came from a man whose T-shirt declared his support for the Green Party.

Once onstage, Perez described his Democratic Party as a vessel for activists, with a platform they could love. It was activists, he said, who stopped the repeal of the Affordable Care Act. It was activists who had passed a minimum-wage hike, which Maines Republican governor had halted.

In these first 100 days, the most remarkable thing is not what Donald Trump did the most remarkable thing is what you did across the county, Perez said.

The chairman left the stage, and a disembodied announcer introduced Sanders. This time, there were no boos; over 48minutes, Sanders mentioned Perezs DNC only once.

Our job is to radically transform the Democratic Party into a 50-state party, Sanders said. Our job is to create a democratic Democratic Party, a grass-roots party, where decisions are made from the bottom up.

Any Sanders supporter could crack that code. In 2016, especially after it became clear that he could not win the nomination, Sanders and his delegates waged a largely successful campaign to move the party to the left.

The platform Perez could not praise quickly enough had been altered to endorse Sanderss economic issues, as well as marijuana decriminalization and the end of a ban on federal money paying for abortion. A unity commission, created to appease Sanders delegates who blamed superdelegates for skewing the primaries, had finally been impaneled and Sanders was watching to see whether it followed his advice.

Since Clintons general election loss, there was little resistance inside the party to Sanderss politics. As the plane flew to Louisville, a Harvard-Harris poll was being released that found Sanders polling at 57 percent favorability with all voters. No politician in America was better-liked.

Sanders is an asset to the Democrats, said Mark Penn, a former Clinton pollster and strategist, in a statement about the poll.

In Kentucky, where Clinton pipped Sanders in the primary, the senators star power followed him to every stop. After he finished his steak sandwich, a souvenir-seeker raced to his half-empty plate and picked up a french fry, waving it at a table of his friends like a trophy.

On a midday visit to Frankfort, where the millennial-focused news site Mic had convened a group of Kentucky voters, Sanders walked past posters from his 2016 bid that had never left the venues windows; selfie-seekers waited more than an hour to see him.

The reason we are on this tour is to do nothing less than try to revitalize American democracy, Sanders said.

Doing so did not mean going easy on Democrats. In Frankfort, as in Mondays speeches, Perez and Sanders suggested that Democrats had lost voters to Trumps GOP because they had stopped talking to them. Perez and Sanders took turns explaining to the Mic-assembled panel that Democrats wanted to help them all to provide free college education, to pay coal miners pensions, to make health care cheaper.

I suspect that the Democratic Party here in Kentucky has not done the kind of job that it should have done in explaining [that] hundreds of thousands of people have received health care, Sanders said to a scrum of reporters after the panel.

[Republicans avoided calamity in this months two special elections, but a lot more peril lies ahead]

Perez, who has criticized Democrats for the same sins, took more shots at the Trump presidency. The cost of one trip to Mar-a-Lago would fund the White House logs database for 13 years, he said, after a windup about the Trump budgets spending cuts. On the way back to Louisville, Perez suggested that Democrats had countless opportunities to portray Trump as a phony populist; the challenge was in focusing and getting anyone to listen.

Your life is not going to improve if your family member, who has an opioid addiction, loses his health care, Perez said. Your life isnt going to improve if an infrastructure bill doesnt have prevailing wage requirements.

On Tuesday, as the tour continued, Perez and Sanders fell in and out of sync. Perez had spent weeks talking up Jon Ossoff, the Democrat trying to win the suburban Atlanta congressional district vacated when Health and Human Services Secretary TomPrice joined the Trump administration. After a closer-than-expected April 11 defeat in a Kansas district, Perez thought Democrats needed to swing at everything.

Sanders was less interested in the Ossoff race. Hes not a progressive, he said. He was endorsing Democrats based on their economic populism; they could differ from progressives on social issues but not on the threat of the mega-rich to American politics. Soon, he said, the 5-to-4 majority on the Supreme Court was likely to make it legal for the wealthy to give unlimited sums to candidates, and the only way to fight back was grass-roots politicking and small donations.

If you are running in rural Mississippi, do you hold the same criteria as if youre running in San Francisco? he said. I think youd be a fool to think thats all the same.

Sanders had said this before, and each time, he had sparked anger from a center-left ready to accuse him of abandoning women or nonwhite voters. On Thursday, he was set to campaign in Omaha for Heath Mello, a Democrat running for mayor who had previously backed a bill requiring ultrasounds for women considering abortions.

But Perez and Sanders were on the same page about candidate diversity. I live in the peoples republic of Takoma Park, Perez said. If you demand fealty on every single issue, then its a challenge. The Democratic Party platform acknowledges that were pro-choice, but there are communities, like some in Kansas, where people have a different position.

By Tuesday night, the tour was starting to click. There was just one heckler in the Palace, who yelled corporate shill at the chairman during a quiet moment. As in Maine, there was a standing ovation when a local member of Congress, a Democrat who had backed Clinton, endorsed Sanderss call for single-payer, Canada-style health care.

And there was a smoother stage show. Perez himself introduced Sanders, and the senator told their audience to bring millions of people into the political process and create a political system not dominated by a handful of billionaires.

After 45 minutes, Perez re-emerged from backstage, following Sanders to the place where a bluegrass band called Relic was playing This Land Is Your Land. The two of them clapped along, belting out Woody Guthries lyrics. From a distance, it looked as if they were singing in harmony.

Read more at PowerPost

Read more here:
Democrats turn to Sanders and his star power to rebuild the party - Washington Post

Two More Democrats and a Republican Interested in Running for Governor – Hartford Courant

Two more Democrats - former federal prosecutor Chris Mattei and former West Hartford Mayor Jonathan Harris are formally exploring runs for governor in 2018, joining an increasingly crowded field of potential candidates from both sides of the aisle.

Less than a week after Democratic Gov. Dannel P. Malloy declared he will not seek a third term, Mattei and Harris announced their intention to file paperwork with state elections officials to create exploratory committees. They joined Democratic Mayor Dan Drew of Middletown, who began his exploratory campaign in January, and Jacey Wyatt of Branford.

In a nearly three minute video posted on YouTube, Mattei outlined his reasons for running. "We've arrived at a troubled time,'' he said. "It seems that the values that I grew up with and that so many of us share are being put to the test every day."

A Windsor native who was the former chief of the financial fraud and public corruption unit for the U.S. Attorney's office, Mattei is best known as the prosecutor who won a conviction against former Gov. John G. Rowland, who is currently serving time in federal prison. Mattei, who lives in Hartford's West End, is an outsider to electoral politics, at least compared with some of his potential rivals who have served as mayors or legislators.

Joe Visconti of West Hartford, who ran twice as a Republican, also filed papers on Wednesday for a 2018 governor's run. He said he plans to bypass the state party convention and go straight to a primary, which requires collecting 8,500 Republican signatures. His move would be a repeat of 2014 when he garnered enough signatures to run against Malloy and Greenwich business executive Tom Foley.

In his video, Mattei, 38, makes a play for Democrats who are newly energized by the election of President Donald Trump. "This is a time for citizenship,'' he said. "What I believe is that if we are to resist what's happening in Washington, that work starts right here at home."

In another move prompted by Malloy's announcement, Harris stepped down as commissioner of the state Department of Consumer Protection earlier this week in a move that frees him up to raise money for a campaign. The Democrat, who served as state senator and state representative in addition to mayor, said Tuesday that he is considering a gubernatorial bid.

"I'll be filing an exploratory committee for statewide office with the goal of running for governor,'' Harris said.

While he plans his political future, Harris will be working as a lawyer at Feiner Wolfson LLC, a Hartford law firm.

But Harris reiterated his intention to sit out the 2018 governor's race if Lt. Gov. Nancy Wyman runs. Wyman, who turns 71 on Friday, has not publicly announced her plans yet.

Although Wyman has remained silent on her future plans, Capitol insiders say they doubt that Harris would have quit his high-paying, secure state job if Wyman was going to jump into the race.

On Wednesday, Wyman declined to comment to The Courant.

State Sen. Ted Kennedy said he had not made any final decisions about running for the open seat either, but is leaving the possibility open.

"I'm thinking about it,'' Kennedy told The Courant.

Even before Malloy announced his decision, more than a half dozen Republicans had expressed interest in a gubernatorial run. The list of declared candidates includes Shelton Mayor Mark Lauretti, U.S. Army veteran Micah Welintukonis of Coventry and state Rep. Prasad Srinivasan of Glastonbury. Danbury Mayor Mark Boughton, former U.S. Comptroller General David Walker, Trumbull First Selectman Tim Herbst, attorney Peter Lumaj, and Fairfield County business executive Steve Obsitnik are among the candidates who have formed exploratory committees for a possible gubernatorial campaign.

House Speaker Joe Aresimowicz of Berlin, who is not running for governor, said he hopes the governor's race will have no impact on the General Assembly as lawmakers wrestle with important bills before the legislative session wraps up June 7.

"In all sincerity, hopefully none,'' Aresimowicz said when asked Wednesday by The Courant. "This is not a time when we can put our political ambitions ahead of what we need to do for the state of Connecticut. ... It's going to require anyone who is interested in a future office to play it straight, to come to the table, be honest, and not come in, drop a bomb and then go out and do a press conference. I pledge not to do that. I pledge to stay at the table around the clock for however long it takes.''

He added, "We can't do it if people are playing political games.''

Originally posted here:
Two More Democrats and a Republican Interested in Running for Governor - Hartford Courant

What are the Super-Rich Democrats Waiting For? – Common Dreams


Common Dreams
What are the Super-Rich Democrats Waiting For?
Common Dreams
Democratic Party loyalists are always complaining about the big-money fat cats behind the Republican Party's candidates and platform. Over the last few election cycles, the Democratic Party has lost most state legislatures, governorships, the US Senate ...

and more »

Read the original here:
What are the Super-Rich Democrats Waiting For? - Common Dreams