Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

Where do Democrats go from here? Look toward Political Influencers who want them to stand up to Trump – Salon

In the wake of Donald Trumps election, the left side of the political spectrum has mobilized with a strength and fervor that few can remember. Protests against the administrations actions have occurred daily, beginning with the Womens March, a massive mobilization that involved more than onein every 100 Americans. The protests have already shifted the political landscape, with Senate Democrats voting en masse against Trumps most controversial nominees, and even successfully derailing Andy Puzder, his pick forlabor secretary.

But for this resistance as its been labeled to sustain itself in the months ahead and truly change politics, it must become a full-fledged movement. To better understand the possibilities for movement-building and explore its implications, we tried to quantify just how influential progressives are feeling today, and what they see as their path forward.

The survey was conducted among 988 respondents identified as Political Influencers. In short, Political Influencers are hyperactive partisans who exhibit a high level of activism. They are involved in a number of political activities, from more traditional approaches to influencing (i.e., voting or signing a petition) to more committed activities (i.e., participating in a local community group or taking part in a demonstration). As their name implies, Political Influencers are active and outgoing, and pride themselves on being well-informed and up to date. Enabling their influence, this audience likes talking about politics and current affairs with friends, and doesnt shy away from expressing opinions.

Gleaning insight into the views of Political Influencers is particularly important because they have an inordinate amount of influence over whether or not movement-building is successful. Research has shown that the impact of an Influencer can be significant, and includes an ability to change behaviors or opinions in others. Basically: Political Influencers are movement-makers.

Awakening a New Political Movement?

Far from agreeing with New York Times columnist David Brooks that protests are ineffectual, 97 percent of respondents believe that demonstrations strongly (68 percent) or somewhat (29 percent) help the cause(s) that are being advocated. Even more noteworthy, the protests and demonstrations that have taken place since the 2016 election appear to be awakening an audience that has previously shied away from such public displays of disapproval. In the past six months, slightly more than half (54 percent) of Political Influencers have taken part in a political protest or demonstration. Of those, only 7 percent say they had regularly participated in protests or demonstrations in the past, while nearly two in five (39 percent) say they had never participated in a protest before. Other research suggests a similar dynamic. A new Quinnipiac poll, for instance, found that nearly half (48 percent) of Democrats say they have become more politically active since the election; the same is true of only 28 percent of independents and 27 percent of Republicans.

Past movements have been successful in part because theyve been able to harness power from those that dont see themselves inherently as protesters or activists. In addition, other polling has shown that the Womens March and other progressive actions are broadly popular among voters, which make them both more effective and harder for Republicans to ignore. Despite claims by Trump that the protesters are paid agitators, they have significantly more public support than he does.

To the benefit of progressive candidates in upcoming elections, Political Influencers also plan to be quite active in terms of political contributions to candidates and causes. Between now and the 2018 election, the mean amount respondents who plan to donate expect to contribute to candidates and causes is $749. Hearteningly, they are more likely to report targeting money toward state and local races than national races, though they are least likely to donate to state and local causes.

Democrats Have Their Vote, but Significant Party-Building Lies Ahead

Of those Political Influencers who express a vote preference in the 2018 midterm election, 98 percent plan to vote for a generic Democrat against a generic Republican. That said, these Influencers dont currently have many good words for their party, which is seen by many as disorganized, spineless, leaderless, weak and ineffective. Even more troubling, a quarter believe the party will still be divided come November 2018.

Fundamentally, there exists a crisis of confidence among Political Influencers when it comes to their views of the Democratic National Committee. While majorities have confidence in state and local Democratic leaders and state parties, and to a lesser extent in Democratic members of the U.S. Senate and House, a majority dont have confidence in the DNC to represent their interests. This lack of confidence is weighing on feelings toward the party. Only 31 percent of Influencers believe the party has strong leadership, and perhaps even more troublingly, only 37 percent believe the party is on a path toward victory.

Another red flag for the Democratic Party moving forward is how few Political Influencers believe that joining a political party is an effective way to ensure their voice is heard by decision-makers. By and large, Influencers see voting in elections as the best way to ensure their voice is heard (79 percent say its one of the best ways). Calling or writing your elected official (72 percent) is also seen as an important way to make your voice heard. Notably, making a political donation (38 percent) is also seen as an important way to ensure being heard. But fewer than one in five Influencers (18 percent) see joining a political party as a top way to ensure your voice is heard by decision-makers. This apathy toward belonging to a political party should act as a warning to the incoming leaders of the Democratic Party. Political Influencers are motivated, and taking action. But they dont see identification with the party as a key way to ensure their voice is being heard.

As to how the party positions itself moving forward, there is one thing all Influencers overwhelmingly agree on: The Democratic Party needs to stand up to Trump. Eighty-one percent of respondents strongly and 13 percent somewhat agree that Democrats should stand their ground against Trump, rather than compromising. Moving forward, the party needs to ensure these Influencers feel that it is speaking and acting in a way that reflects their own voices. The party standing its ground against Trump is the surest way to do so.

How Young Influencers are Shaking Up the Party

Moving forward, the party needs to both better understand and better address the unease of younger Influencers. Young Influencers were least likely to believe that voting is the most effective way to make a difference (only 56 percent of those under 30 vs. 71 percent of those 65 or older) and also the least likely to say they always vote (74 percent vs. 94 percent, respectively). Influencers young and old must embrace the importance of voting, and the party is an important messenger in that conversation.

It appears that divides stemming from the 2016 Democratic primary campaign remain, as disproportionately high levels of distrust toward the Democratic National Committee exist among younger Influencers. While only 35 percent of those age 65 or older say they trust the DNC a little or not at all, 57 percent of those under 30 distrust the DNC. Younger respondents were also less likely to approve of how Democrats in Congress were handling their job, with 87 percent of those 65 or older approving compared to 71 percent of those under 30. In addition, only 28 percent of those under 30 say that fights for working families describes Democrats very well, compared to 42 percent of those 65 or older.

While these divides are certainly not chasms, they do indicate potential areas of friction among Political Influencers moving forward, particularly when it comes to party-building. And they provide a caution flag to Democratic leaders: More can and should be done to address this trust deficit that exists, particularly among younger Political Influencers.

Identity Politics or Populism?

Following the presidential election, there has been a lengthy debate about the tension between a progressive embrace of civil rights and an embrace of economic populism. Notably, few respondents worried that the Democrats were too focused on the interests of people of color (i.e., consumed by identity politics). Even more notably, young respondents were least likely to believe the party is too focused on speaking to communities of color. Fifty-five percent of those under 30 said that described Democrats not well at all compared to 38 percent of those 65 or older.

These low numbers believing the party is too focused on identity politics paired with the high numbers who believe the Democratic Party is fighting for working families would suggest Influencers dont see these questions as zero-sum. Instead, they may perceive that identity politics ensures that populism does not become racially exclusionary, while economic progressivism ensures that identity politics remains tethered to economic liberation.

Though many have been quick to draw lessons from the Tea Party, it also provides a cautionary tale of ideological purity. The fixation on ideological purity in the Tea Party movement almost certainly cost Republicans seats in the Senate and sunk the grand bargain, an agreement that favored their interests. Instead, President Obama got some of the tax increases he wanted later anyway, while Social Security and Medicare were spared from even modest cuts. Today, the extreme positions of the Tea Party imperil the Republican Partys long-sought plan to repeal the Affordable Care Act.

We find that ideological purity may not be as much of a stumbling block on the left as it has remained for Republicans. Respondents were asked whether they would prefer making sure Democrats espouse strong progressive values or are united in their opposition to President Trump. Fully 62 percent of respondents choose the latter. Progressives would be wise to learn from the mistakes the Tea Party made in 2010, and avoid the temptation to let ideological purity supersede an ability to coalesce a winning majority united in opposition to Trump necessary to win back control of the House in 2018.

Conclusion: The Path Forward

The strength and fervor of this resistance is real and has the potential to grow into a full-fledged political movement. These insights from Political Influencers suggest four key takeaways to watch moving forward:

1. There are signs that this effort is engaging people who havent been actively engaged in politics in the past.

It appears that resistance efforts are indeed drawing new blood into the Influencer circle, engaging progressives who havent always been as actively involved. Making sure these new Influencers feel like their voice is being heard will be critical. Equally important, there is a recognition among Political Influencers that for change to happen, it must be fought for at all levels of government, including at the state and local level.

2. Political Influencers play an important role in the strength and direction of the resistance effort moving forward. Right now, there is a crisis of confidence in the national party.

While Political Influencers are overwhelmingly planning to vote for and support Democrats heading into 2018, the partyhas some significant rebuilding ahead. These folks are motivated and taking action, but they dont see identification with the party as a key way to ensure their voice is being heard. Moving forward, the party needs to ensure these Influencers feel it is speaking and acting in a way that reflects their own voices. Standing up against Trump is the surest way to do so.

3. Progressives need to avoid the missteps of the Tea Party, and right now, they are. But care must be taken to avoid the trap of ideological purity.

The Tea Partys legislative success has been and remains muted, in part because of its insistence on ideological purity. While these findings suggest that ideological purity may not provide a similar challenge for the left, it is important to learn from the Tea Partys mistakes.

4. Democrats need to portray themselves as a party thats willing to fight, and rely on their state and local counterparts to organize resistance efforts.

Political Influencers are desperately seeking a national Democratic operation that acts as a bullhorn for their own voices to be heard. Right now, these Influencers dont express confidence that the DNC represents their interests, and even fewer believe the party has strong leadership or is on a path toward victory. Bottom line: The work is cut out for this new team that takes the reins at the DNC. In the meantime, Political Influencers recognize the importance of state and local organizing efforts, and are involving themselves at this level. Its here, at the grassroots, that the rebuilding effort will reap its greatest rewards.

Note: The authors conducted a national survey of 988 Political Influencers. The survey was conducted from Feb. 7-11, 2017. For this survey, a Political Influencer is someone who has engaged in five or more of the following activities: presented his or her views to an elected leader (i.e., through letters, emails or calls); written a letter to an editor; urged someone outside his or her family to vote; used social media to discuss politics; urged someone outside his or her family to take part in a demonstration; urged someone to get in touch with an elected official; made a speech before an organized group; served as officer of an organization or club; run for public office; taken an active part in a political campaign; signed a petition; voted in an election; donated to a campaign or issue advocacy organization; participated in a community group that advocated for a specific issue; or taken part in a demonstration or protest.

These insights represent a diversity of voices across geographies, ages and professions. Notably, Political Influencers are not limited to traditional political circles and more often than not come from seemingly unrelated industries; in fact only 2 percent of respondents in this research consider their jobs to be in political advocacy and fewer than 2 percent reside in Washington. Political Influencers on the left are disproportionately white, female and college-educated. But whats notable is that differences across these demographic groups are muted, the exception being among younger Political Influencers.

See more here:
Where do Democrats go from here? Look toward Political Influencers who want them to stand up to Trump - Salon

ExclusiveRegnery: Anti-Trump Democrats’ Best Allies Are Senate Republicans – Breitbart News

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

There are another 120 vacant federal judgeships and, of course, the Neil Gorsuch nomination to the Supreme Court. Each requires Senate approval.

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

White House staff is busily choosing and vetting candidates for the rest of the positions, and there undoubtedly will be many nominations sent to the Senate for confirmation in the next several weeks.

And where is the Senate now? On vacation.

We hear a lot of talk that Harry Reid gave away the store when he exercised the nuclear option, and that Republicans have the 51 votes needed to get the Trump team confirmed. That may be, but with the way Majority Leader Mitch McConnell runs the Senate, Democrats canand probably willmake it impossible to confirm more than a handful of nominees.

The problem isnt the votes. Republicans have those. The problem is timefloor time.

As a senior Senate staffer told me this week: Regardless of how many votes it takes to confirm or approve anything in the Senate, if Democrats want to force the issue, they can require a minimum of 30 hours to debate any nomination or any bill. Let that sink in. 549 vacancies, at 30 hours each, equals 686 days. If you subtract weekends, and add a nice vacation every few months, you are looking at never finishing this job throughout the entirety of Donald Trumps first term. And this assumes they are in session around the clock and do no other legislative business, which is also impossible.

Under Senate rules, when debate is cut off, senators are entitled to another 30 hours of debate. Since the Senate is rarely in session for more than 25to 30 hours a week, Democrats can tie things up indefinitely.

So you would think the Senate would be working long hours, forcing Democrats to talk until exhausted, so the Presidents team gets confirmed, right?

Wrong. After doing virtually no work during most of January, and working at a leisurely pace in February, the Senate just left town for a 10-day recess. That means they went home to campaignafter being on the job for about six weeks. As my friend said: The Democrats are shutting down the Senates business, and Mitch McConnells answer is to give everyone a big vacation. The message to Democrats is: keep up the great work, we have no intention of fighting back.

The result? The government will be run by bureaucrats, Obama holdovers and temporary acting trump appointees. Neil Gorsuch wont get confirmed for weeks and weeks, and other judicial vacancies will remain vacant. Not to mention letting President Trumps program simply die on the vinethe crucial business of repealing Obamacare, tax reform, passing budgets and appropriations, and the rest of the things Donald Trump and taxpayers so badly need.

So what is to be done?

I spoke with a long-time staff member from the Senate Judiciary Committee (who must remain anonymous if he wants to keep his job), who told me that Republicans only remedy is to force Democrats to debate until they wear themselves out. Schedule Senate floor debates to go all day and night, on weekends and holidays until Democrats cry uncle.

Is McConnell likely to do that? I asked. Not a chance, said my friend.

Are any Republican Senators demanding that they fight back? I asked.

Not a one, I was told.

Gov. Jay Inslee of Washington told the New York Times this week that [Democrats] have to resist [Trump] every way and everywhere, every time we can By undermining Mr. Trump across the board, Democrats hope to split Republicans away from a president of their own party.

Unless Mitch McConnell gets down to business and gets the Senate back to work, he may help Democrats do exactly that.

Alfred S. Regnery serves as the Chairman of the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund.

Original post:
ExclusiveRegnery: Anti-Trump Democrats' Best Allies Are Senate Republicans - Breitbart News

Democrats slam leaked draft of ObamaCare replacement – New York Post


New York Post
Democrats slam leaked draft of ObamaCare replacement
New York Post
The leaked draft was immediately slammed by Democrats. This isn't a replacement, it's a recipe for disaster, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), the Senate Democratic leader, said in a statement. Meanwhile, Bloomberg News reported that top health-insurance ...
Democrats want to see GOP replacement to ObamacareABC6OnYourSide.com

all 462 news articles »

Read more:
Democrats slam leaked draft of ObamaCare replacement - New York Post

Some Advice for the Democrats – New York Times


New York Times
Some Advice for the Democrats
New York Times
Let's not panic! Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by almost three million votes. She formed a very diverse coalition of voters, especially in urban areas, and her policies are pragmatic progressive. That coalition is what the Democratic Party ...
Hillary Clinton to Democrats: 'Keep fighting and keep the faith'Washington Post
Hillary Clinton releases video message to rally DemocratsKGO-TV
2020 race lures sprawling Democratic fieldPolitico
BuzzFeed News -Yahoo News -Hollywood Reporter
all 309 news articles »

Go here to read the rest:
Some Advice for the Democrats - New York Times

Impeach Trump? Most Democrats already say ‘yes.’ – The … – Washington Post

Donald Trump has been president for about a month. And already, a sizable majority of Democrats say he should be impeached.

A new poll from the Public Religion Research Institute shows 58 percent of Democrats are onboard with the idea of impeaching Trump.

That's not an unthinkable number in our polarized political climate, but it is extraordinarily early in a presidency for such a high level of support for impeachment. As PRRI notes, as late as 2014 in the sixth year of Barack Obama's presidency a similar proportion of Republicans supported impeachment: 56 percent. And even as the case for the Iraq War was being picked apart in 2006, Democratic support for impeaching George W. Bush was only at 48 percent lower than it is today for Trump.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi says she hasn't called for President Trump's impeachment yet, but added "when and if he breaks the law, this is when something like that will come up." Pelosi made the comments at a news conference on Monday, Feb. 6 at the Capitol after California Rep. Maxine Waters said, "eventually we've got to do something about him." (Reuters)

Overall support for Trump's impeachment (27 percent) is still slightly lower than it was for Obama in 2014 (30 percent) and Bush in 2006 (30 percent). But the support for impeachment among Democrats appears to be what is keeping the overall number for Trump in the same ballpark.

It's a testament to just how insatiable Democrats' appetite is for opposing Trump something we've seen in other polling as well. A Pew poll this week showed 72 percent of Democrats were more worried their leaders would do too little to oppose Trump vs. 20 percent who were worried they would do too much.

And according to this new poll, the vast majority of that 72 percent doesn'tthink impeaching Trump even at this early juncture is going too far. That's not exactly a recipe for bipartisanship going forward.

The grounds for impeaching Trump or any other president, it bears noting, are laid out in the Constitution, which says a president shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Democratic Sen. Al Franken of Minnesota recently joked that such a situation was months and months away, since Republicans control Congress and would have to support impeachment. And that's a key point: Congress is always reluctant to move toward impeachment especially since it can backfire, as it did late in Bill Clinton's presidency. But in the case of Trump, it's even more unlikely given Republicans control the House, which would initiate any impeachment proceedings if it got to that point.

Some Democrats and ethics groups havesued alleging Trump is already in violation of the law specifically, the emoluments clause, which prohibits a politician from accepting any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. (The Post's Allison Michaels and David Fahrenthold have much more on this in this week's version of the Can He Do That? podcast.)

And there already are very real grass-roots efforts to push for impeachment. A petition with 850,000 signatures on it was delivered to Congress last week. And Democratic leaders are trying to beat back the growing calls for impeachmentfrom their base.

Good luck with that.

View post:
Impeach Trump? Most Democrats already say 'yes.' - The ... - Washington Post