Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category
Texas Democrats call on colleges to set aside financial aid money for immigrant families affected by FAFSA glitch – The Texas Tribune
Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribunes daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.
Texas Democrats in Congress are appealing to colleges to set aside financial aid funds for students who have not been able to complete the new FAFSA form because their parents do not have Social Security numbers.
Errors in the revamped Free Application for Federal Student Aid, which launched this year, have prevented parents without Social Security numbers from adding their financial information. The problem has disproportionately affected immigrant families.
A majority of Texas Democrats in the U.S. House signed an open letter Monday, calling on the states colleges to track how much money went last year to students whose parents do not have Social Security numbers, and to ensure a similar amount remains available until June 1 or until the federal government confirms it has forwarded to the colleges all the financial aid records they have from students affected by the error.
We are greatly troubled about the disparate discriminatory impact this will have on thousands of Texas students seeking financial benefit being foreclosed to them due to nothing other than the immigration status of their contributor, said the letter, which was spearheaded by U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas.
In Texas, about one in four children has at least one parent who is not a U.S. citizen. Students must be U.S. citizens or have legal immigration status to apply for federal financial aid.
The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board extended the state priority deadline to submit the FAFSA to April 15 to acknowledge the technical challenges students from immigrant families have faced. But Texas colleges offer aid on a first-come, first serve basis, which means they could run out of funds by then and before many immigrant students can be considered to receive financial aid.
Adjusting priority deadline policy alone is not sufficient, the lawmakers letter said. An institution which only adjusts its deadline policy may still find that it has awarded all of its available funds before the institution even receives the [Social Security Number]-burdened students [financial aid records].
For four months, the U.S. Department of Education has been working on fixing the FAFSA error. Feds in mid-March announced a technical update that allowed students with parents without Social Security numbers to submit the form. But in the same announcement, they revealed two more bugs affecting the same group of students.
Parents without Social Security numbers have to enter their financial information manually, while other contributors can have the IRS pull their information directly from their tax filings. And those parents get an error message when the name or address they put down does not exactly match what their child entered.
Of the 13 Texas Democrats in Congress, ten signed the letter: Crockett; U.S. Reps. Greg Casar and Lloyd Doggett of Austin; Joaquin Castro of San Antonio; Colin Allred of Dallas; Veronica Escobar of El Paso; Sylvia R. Garcia, Al Green and Sheila Jackson Lee of Houston; and Marc Veasey of Fort Worth. They join a growing number of lawmakers who have intervened in the rollout of the new FAFSA, which Congress mandated in 2020 to streamline the form and make it easier to complete.
The Texas Tribune partners with Open Campus on higher education coverage.
We cant wait to welcome you to downtown Austin Sept. 5-7 for the 2024 Texas Tribune Festival! Join us at Texas breakout politics and policy event as we dig into the 2024 elections, state and national politics, the state of democracy, and so much more. When tickets go on sale this spring, Tribune members will save big. Donate to join or renew today.
Read this article:
Texas Democrats call on colleges to set aside financial aid money for immigrant families affected by FAFSA glitch - The Texas Tribune
Tags:
Biden and Other Democrats Tie Trump to Limits on Abortion Rights – The New York Times
Democrats, seeking to tie abortion restrictions to former President Donald J. Trump and Republicans, again laid the blame for limits on reproductive rights at Mr. Trumps feet, saying the former presidents statement on Monday calling for abortion restrictions to be decided by states was part of a pattern of extreme lawmaking.
In the video he released, Mr. Trump said that states should decide through legislation and make it the law of the land, and in this case, the law of the state. A handful of Republicans disagreed, saying he did not go far enough by not endorsing a federal ban or discussing it at all. But Democrats, who have identified reproductive rights as a top campaign issue this year, argue that Mr. Trump effectively did endorse a total ban by leaving the decision to states who will implement one and that, if re-elected, he will enact a total ban on the procedure something Mr. Trump has not specifically said he would do.
In a blistering 604-word statement, President Biden said via his campaign that Mr. Trump was responsible for creating the cruelty and the chaos that has enveloped America since the Dobbs decision, referring to the 2022 Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson, which overturned Roe v. Wade. The president said that his opponents abortion stance has created a crisis of his own making. Mr. Trump, he said, is lying about the number of Americans who support abortion restrictions and scrambling to craft a message around his record.
Heres what Donald Trump doesnt understand: When he ripped away Roe v. Wade, he ripped away a fundamental right for the women of America that the United States Supreme Court had affirmed and reaffirmed for 50 years. As a fundamental right, it didnt matter where you lived, Mr. Biden said in the statement.
The president also challenged Mr. Trumps false statement that Americans widely support restrictions on abortion and said the former president made a political deal to appoint Supreme Court justices who would overturn Roe v. Wade in exchange for support from anti-abortion voters.
Trump admits as much in his statement today, Mr. Biden said. Having created the chaos of overturning Roe, hes trying to say, Oh, never mind. Dont punish me for that. I just want to win.
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit andlog intoyour Times account, orsubscribefor all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber?Log in.
Want all of The Times?Subscribe.
See the rest here:
Biden and Other Democrats Tie Trump to Limits on Abortion Rights - The New York Times
Tags:
Rejected CHS Sheriff candidate Alan Ali sues SC Democrats | Palmetto Politics – The Post and Courier
A rejected candidate for Charleston County sheriff has sued the South Carolina Democratic Party, accusing it of unconstitutionally keeping him off the upcoming primary ballot with a rule that his attorneys called "completely vague" and "entirely subjective."
Alan Ali, a former Charleston County sheriff's lieutenant, filed the lawsuit on April 12, a week after state Democratic Party officials refused to certify him as a candidate for the party's June 11 primary.
The legal challenge amounts to a last-ditch effort by Ali to challenge Charleston County's Democratic sheriff for the party's nomination, asking the county Circuit Court to certify his candidacy and with haste.
Election officials must finalize the ballots for military and overseas voters by April 26.
A judge could ultimately determine whether incumbent Sheriff Kristin Graziano will face a primary challenger. If the court upholds the party's decision, it would effectively clear the Democratic field for Graziano's reelection campaign in the primary.
The court's decision would have immediate political ramifications.
Rather than focusing on a primary challenger in June, Graziano could instead focus her efforts on fundraising, outreach and messaging for a general election where she is expected to face a fierce challenge. Four Republicans have already lined up to run against her.
Ali, a first-time candidate who was the only declared Democratic challenger running against Graziano, is being represented by Charleston attorney Mark Peper's law firm.
The 62-page lawsuit claims a rule adopted by the S.C. Democratic Party violated Ali's constitutional rights, and argues that party officials were playing political favorites and trying to protect incumbents when certifying candidates.
The suit opens by invoking the words of Coretta Scott King, an icon of the civil rights movement and the wife of Martin Luther King Jr.
"Freedom and justice cannot be parceled out in pieces to suit political convenience," she said. "You cant stand for freedom for one group of people and deny it to others."
S.C. Democratic Party Rule 11, which was adopted in 2022, is at the center of the legal challenge.
Under party rules, any South Carolina Democrat can challenge a candidate's qualifications.
Ali's qualifications were challenged on April 3. In a hearing the next day, he was questioned about being a Dorchester County resident, a longtime Republican voter and a possible contender for this year's Republican nomination for Dorchester County sheriff.
The party's executive council unanimously voted against certifying Ali's ballot application. And at their recommendation, S.C. Democratic Party Chair Christale Spain made the decision not to certify Ali as a candidate.
Spain said she rejected Ali's ballot certification on April 5 because of questions about his loyalty to the Democratic Party.
In an interview with The Post and Courier, Spain called Ali a "Republican." She cited his voting history and his previous flirtation with running for Dorchester County sheriff as a Republican.
Ali described himself to reporters on April 9 as a "moderate."
In a letter explaining her decision, Spain cited Rule 11, saying there was "a question about his support and allegiance to the Democratic Party and the Partys values."
The rule says that the state party chair, in consultation with the party's executive committee, has the right to not certify a candidate if they "demonstrated intent to mislead voters and party officials regarding that candidates support and allegiance to the Democratic Party and the Partys values."
Ali's attorneys questioned its legality. They cited two recent candidates who have previously run in past Republican primaries but were certified by the S.C. Democratic Party as evidence that the party is following this rule at its own discretion.
Ali's attorneys argued the rule is "completely vague, entirely subjective, and serves as nothing more than a 'catch all' provision to be used at the sole discretion and convenience of the SCDP."
They also note that the rules do not clearly define what constitutes the "partys values" nor provide a clear and concise example of how a candidate can prove their "support and allegiance to the Democratic Party."
Ali's attorneys have asked for a speedy hearing on the matter. As of the afternoon of April 12, no hearing date has been set, according to court records.
Read the original here:
Rejected CHS Sheriff candidate Alan Ali sues SC Democrats | Palmetto Politics - The Post and Courier
Tags: