Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

Its time for Democrats to fear their own voters – The Guardian

After the overturning of Roe v Wade, there is bad news and there is good news. But first, an admission.

For most of my adult life, Ive clung to a grand unifying theory: the only way to fight off rightwing fascism is to build not just a well-organized progressive movement, but to also mobilize rank-and-file apolitical Democratic voters to press their own party to deliver.

If Democratic base constituencies college-educated white-collars, communities of color, young people, etc went beyond merely voting in November and actually made demands of their Democratic lawmakers (and held them accountable in primaries), then maybe the party would pursue its purported agenda with the same urgency as the Republican party does for its conservative base. And if that happened, maybe more voters would flock to Democrats who were materially improving their lives.

Over the last 25 years, the opposite has happened.

While Republican normie voters were being radicalized by Fox News and talk radio, Democratic normie voters were being anesthetized by NPR, the New York Times, the Atlantic and MSNBC, which taught them to believe that an extremist like John Roberts is a lovable moderate, Mike Pence is an American hero, George Bush is a decent guy, and an operative who installed Sam Alito on the court is a warrior for democracy.

That media machine convinced Democratic normies to believe the highest calling of citizenship was to simply line up behind party-approved candidates, crush progressive challengers in primaries, and vote blue, no matter who in general elections and then do nothing more, even when electable conservative Democrats lost and the few winners produced no change. The worst thing anyone could do, they taught viewers, was criticize, pressure, or protest Democratic leaders to try to get them to do anything.

At the same time, Barack Obama and his administration persuaded normie Democrats that the celebrity candidate would save the day, that progressive pressure campaigns are fucking retarded, and that Obamas hand-picked candidate, Hillary Clinton, was the most viable successor. Meanwhile, the labor movement was crushed by Democrats trade deals and corporate union busting, disempowering what had been a radicalizing force inside the Democratic coalition.

And yet, heres the admission: it wasnt just external factors that undermined this effort to mobilize normies. It was a failure of an entire generation of operatives, activists, advocacy journalists, policy wonks, philanthropists, filmmakers, pundits, labor leaders, thinktankers, Capitol Hill staff and politicians in left-of-center politics and I include myself in that group of failures.

We could console ourselves by feeling like Dont Look Ups Dr Mindy when he points up at the comet and says: Weve been trying to warn you!

But lets admit it: the campaigns, advocacy and pressure of my generation and the Boomers did not radicalize the normies quickly enough. We were not just outgunned by conservatives, outspent by corporatists, and undermined by liberal careerists selling their souls for the next hot take we were also outmaneuvered, outsmarted and outperformed.

We failed, and that failure allowed Democratic leaders to never fear their own base to the point where Democratic voters gave their presidential nomination to the candidate who authored the crime bill, allied with segregationists, championed the Iraq war, touted social security cuts, voted to let states restrict abortion and sharpened bankruptcy laws.

So heres the bad news: because this dynamic allowed Democratic leaders to never feel the heat of accountability, they never wielded their power to make a serious effort to avert the current nightmare. In many cases, they did the opposite.

The Obama presidency was defined by initiatives to prop up health insurance predators, protect Wall Street criminals and abandon promises to Democratic voters, which created the backlash conditions and depressed turnout that helped lead to Donald Trumps ascent. The Biden presidency has been similarly defined by the party living up to the presidents promise that nothing would fundamentally change and its attendant unwillingness to materially improve the lives of anyone other than billionaires and corporate executives, all while the administration boosts various rightwing causes.

The crescendo of this phantasmagoria has led to this grim reality: As conservative justices now turn on a spigot of extremist rulings, the Democratic president is giving half-hearted speeches pretending he has no power, and issuing reports declining to even support expanding the supreme court due to concerns about protecting its independence and legitimacy.

For their part, Democratic congressional leaders are singing patriotic ballads while sending out fundraising emails. They expect yet another positive response from a base that up until now has politely asked for but never really demanded anything from them in return.

If youve somehow read this far, you are probably gut-punched. But heres the good-news payoff for still being here: yes, there are signs that at this dangerously late hour, normie Democratic voters may finally have had enough of this shit.

Last month, a stat buried in an NBC News poll showed that nearly two thirds of Democratic voters said they now want a candidate who proposes larger-scale policies that cost more and might be harder to pass into law, but could bring major change. Just a third said they prefer a candidate who proposes smaller-scale policies that cost less and might be easier to pass into law, but will bring less change on these issues.

Put another way: 63% of the party is finally radicalized, and just 33% are still clinging to the normie view. This might explain why a group of progressive congressional challengers recently overcame the odds and won their primaries, even against party leaders endorsements.

At the same time, a Fairleigh Dickinson University survey found a plurality of Americans no longer buy Democrats argument that they have no power to do anything and that includes a quarter of Democrats and nearly half of independents. A full 50% of Democrats say Joe Biden has power to reduce inflation and healthcare costs.

Quinnipiacs new poll also shows just a quarter of young voters approve of the way Biden is handling his job, and his numbers are similarly low among Black and Latino voters.

Taken together, this is empirical proof that core Democratic constituencies may finally be evaluating their partys president on his actual record, rather than just mindlessly cheering him on because hes wearing the blue home-team jersey.

This healthy attitude is starting to seep into popular culture. As one example: The Daily Show historically the normiest of normie Democratic television programs is now openly mocking party leaders refusal to do anything to stop the Republican onslaught. As Democratic policy wonk Will Stancil put it, thats a sign that anger at do-nothing Dems really has gone completely mainstream in a way that seemed impossible three or four years ago.

If history is any indication, thats good. Democratic leaders only did things like enact social security, create Medicare, pass the Voting Rights Act and end the Vietnam war once they feared the electoral consequences of inaction. The same dynamic holds today: you can bet Democratic leaders will not fulfill their longtime promise to statutorily codify reproductive rights until and unless they feel the same kind of anger and pressure as their predecessors felt in their day.

Thats how democracy is supposed to work: were supposed to evaluate representatives not on their personalities or party affiliations, but on their records, and when they fail to deliver on their promises, those representatives are supposed to fear being denied their partys nomination and thrown out of office by their own voters.

Politicians respond to only one thing power, wrote Ta-Nehisi Coates back in 2011. This is not the flaw of democracy, its the entire point. Its the job of activists to generate, and apply, enough pressure on the system to affect change.

Thats how the American right ultimately brought us to this horrible moment: They conditioned Republican voters to actually expect and demand things, and punish those who wouldnt deliver.

That same attitude is whats needed from Democratic voters now not just rage aimed at the conservative ideologues turning back the clock, but also rage at the Democrats who control the government today. Those elected officials must be forced kicking and screaming against their own desires to actually produce. Not tomorrow. Now.

Of course, many of us have been saying this for decades and have been berated and belittled for doing so. But at least for a moment, it finally feels like were no longer alone.

If thats fleeting, were screwed. If its enduring, then theres still a tiny glimmer of hope.

David Sirota is a Guardian US columnist and an award-winning investigative journalist. He is an editor at large at Jacobin, and the founder of the Daily Poster. He served as Bernie Sanders presidential campaign speechwriter

Read more:
Its time for Democrats to fear their own voters - The Guardian

The Problem With Moderate Democrats Is Not That Theyre Vanishing. Its That They Have No Ideas. – The New Republic

Its possible, as some have argued, that the solution is to take on the partys left flank on social issues. This is something of a red herring, however: From Defund the Police to critical race theory, Republicans are ginning up pseudo-scandals that have little to do with the Democratic Partys actual positions or anything that the partys leaders have called for; other areas, like trans athletics, are tempests in a teapotissues that only affect a vanishingly small number of people. This is not to diminish the impact of these issues on the lives of ordinary people, but its not clear that overreacting to inflated GOP talking points by shifting to the right will help Democrats more than fighting back against those same talking pointsnot that Democrats are really doing that, either.

But the other problem is that many of the ideas that people like Gottheimer promote simply arent that popular. Gottheimer is no populist firebrand; his commitment to the repeal of the SALT cap gives away the game. While Democrats desperately need to find a way to reach out to noncollege voters, none of these representatives have found the magic touch to do so. Their donor base isnt interested in raising the fortunes of the middle and working class, and it shows: These moderates are silent on (or have actively worked against) issues like allowing Medicare to negotiate directly with pharmaceutical companies on drug prices or the extension of the child tax creditan actual tax cut that is extremely popular.

The cupboard is bare in terms of a moderate theory of governance as well. The thing about moderates today is I dont think they have a worldview, political scientist Ruy Teixeira told Zengerle. Theyre just reacting to what [Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez] and the Democratic left are doing. But whats their alternative? I dont think they have an alternative. Dont do dumb stuff is not a worldview.

See the original post:
The Problem With Moderate Democrats Is Not That Theyre Vanishing. Its That They Have No Ideas. - The New Republic

Democrats need to give "some good ideas" on ensuring abortion rights: Becerra – Axios

Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra told NBC's "Meet the Press" Sunday that Democrats criticizing the Biden administration's strategy to ensure abortion rights ought to "give us some good ideas."

Driving the news: In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, some progressives have called for the Biden administration to build abortion facilities on federal lands located in red states a move the administration has made clear it is not pursuing.

The big picture: "I also would ask them to please pass a law. They have it in their power, if they can find the votes to actually codify the Roe decision, which is what we need more than anything else," Becerra added when asked by host Chuck Todd about Democrats who believe the administration is "not fighting hard enough" for abortion rights.

What they're saying: "We will find what we can and do as much as we can. But when you are stripped of a right, as the Supreme Court has just done to every woman of childbearing age, it is tough to overcome," he said.

Read the rest here:
Democrats need to give "some good ideas" on ensuring abortion rights: Becerra - Axios

Democrats campaign off Roe overturn, raise more than $80M – The Hill

Democrats and aligned groups have fundraised more than $80 million one week after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, an impressive fundraising haul that comes just ahead of the November midterms, The Associated Press reported.

Digital fundraising platform ActBlue recorded those numbers, which found that within the first 24 hours of the Supreme Courts decision being announced, $20 million had been raised, the news outlet noted.

Last week, the high court eliminated the constitutional right to an abortion, a decision that was celebrated by conservatives and blasted by Democrats.

The ruling has led a patchwork of states to begin rolling back access to abortion, resulting in girls, women and other patients having to cross state lines to receive the medical procedure.

The decision was anticipated by some after a leaked Supreme Court draft opinion in May indicated the high court was set to overturn Roe, which fueled Democratic fundraising shortly thereafter.

Donors gave $12 million through ActBlue from the time of the SCOTUS leak thru midnight yesterday, giving to groups that are organizing right nowabortion funds, reproductive justice groups both big and small, & candidates who will fight GOP efforts to restrict abortion access, ActBlue tweeted on May 4.

The latest fundraising haul indicates that the issue can excite Democrats base, but it is not clear how that will translate by November. Democrats are already bracing for losses given President Bidens low approval ratings, high inflation and the historical precedent that the presidents party generally suffers losses in the midterms.

The Hill has reached out to ActBlue for comment.

See the original post here:
Democrats campaign off Roe overturn, raise more than $80M - The Hill

Democrats push for campaign reset in the most pro-abortion rights swing state – POLITICO

So did Kevin Smith, the Londonderry town manager and former director of a conservative advocacy organization, who has repeatedly attacked Hassan for opposing the 24-week abortion ban in the state.

Several of the Republicans running against Kuster and Pappas have expressed similar views on the Supreme Courts decision or stayed silent in the wake of its ruling a sign of the complicated politics. Instead, New Hampshire Republicans have quickly returned to hammering their Democratic rivals over inflation and rising fuel prices.

Weve got commonsense laws here regarding abortion and thats not the focus going forward, New Hampshire GOP Chair Steve Stepanek said in an interview. The focus is, how do we get this Biden inflation under control? And I think most people are concerned about their future, concerned about putting food on the table.

Democrats contend that reproductive rights are fueling voters uncertainties just as much as the economy and in an interview, Kuster connected the two.

Its fine by me if [Republicans] miss the moment and misunderstand whats happening, Kuster said. Of course people are concerned about lowering costs. But those very people know that they probably cant afford another child if they have two or three children. And they want to control their future, their autonomy. They want to continue their schooling. They want to stay in the workplace. They dont want the government mandating a pregnancy that they do not intend.

Support for abortion rights is on the rise in New Hampshire and at an all-time high among voters nationally. Yet some of those same polls, and many others, show the economy is still top of mind for voters, with gas prices recently topping $5 a gallon on average in New England and the prices of food and other goods rising along with it.

Those concerns, coupled with President Joe Bidens approval numbers and U.S. inflation numbers moving in opposite directions, have given Republicans in New Hampshire and elsewhere plenty of fodder against their Democratic rivals.

Regardless of the abortion issue, the Democrats will still have a lower voter turnout than Republicans, because people are so frustrated with Joe Biden and the Democrats in Washington who are doing absolutely nothing to help our economy, said Mike Dennehy, a veteran New Hampshire Republican strategist.

Democrats dismiss that charge. In conversations and press calls, Hassan, Pappas and Kuster were all quick to describe efforts to lower gas prices and prescription drug costs. Hassan has for months been pushing to suspend the 18 cents-per-gallon federal gas tax a call that hasnt generated much enthusiasm in Washington, and which her Republican rivals have dismissed as an election year gimmick.

I know there are a number of economic challenges that were facing in New Hampshire, Pappas said in an interview. Were working hard on gas prices, and lowering prices at the grocery store and addressing inflation.

While Democrats are trying to leverage abortion as a major campaign issue, they have to give equal weight to inflation and cost of living concerns.

Obviously, the pocketbook issues, thats top of mind for voters, Kuster said. But I would not underestimate particularly the decision in Roe that hits so close to home and affects peoples personal lives.

View post:
Democrats push for campaign reset in the most pro-abortion rights swing state - POLITICO