Sharyl Attkisson to CNN: Facts Show I Dont Only Target Democrats
Sharyl Attkisson to CNN: Facts Show I Don #39;t Only Target Democrats.
By: Abbadessa
Read more from the original source:
Sharyl Attkisson to CNN: Facts Show I Dont Only Target Democrats - Video
Sad Democrats
The Democrats reign of terror is coming to an end. But, we still have our eye on you, GOP. Don #39;t f it up! Launching A Leadership Revolution http://bit.ly/18vMyIe LeaderShift: A Call for Americans...
By: OpenCarryVancouver
See more here:
Sad Democrats - Video
dopamine downs the Democrats
Why did the Democrats lose big time November 4th? The answer is four inches behind your eyes.
By: Howard Bloom
Continued here:
dopamine downs the Democrats - Video
Facing a tough midterm election, Democrats put aside some of their remaining scruples about the new age of unlimited campaign spending and courted unions and hedge-fund billionaires for big checks to try to salvage a Senate majority.
They spent a lot of money. But not enough.
This year, in a reversal of 2012, the big-money Democratic donors watched their investments return little on election night Tuesday. Although Republicans outspent them overall, Democrats got beaten even in states like Colorado and North Carolina where they spent the same or even a little more than Republicans.
"We just saw a national tsunami," said Ty Matsdorf, an advisor to the Senate Majority PAC, which spent about $50 million across the country in a mostly futile effort to keep Democrats in office.
"I don't think there's anything more we should have done," Matsdorf said. "Here's the truth: Everybody knew this was going to be a hard cycle. Everyone knew we were going to face extremely strong head winds."
Republican donors credited their success to a number of adjustments they had made since the last election cycle: more say in choosing electable candidates, investment in get-out-the-vote efforts that had been a Democratic advantage, and a late spending push.
The spending in the 2014 midterm showed how the remaining restrictions on campaign spending continue to weaken. More money moved into "super PACs" and dark-money nonprofits, where donations are unlimited, and away from candidate accounts that are still subject to strict limits on individual giving and disclosure.
Overall, including spending by candidates and outside groups, Republicans spent about $1.75 billion to Democrats' $1.64 million, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan group that tracks election spending.
But those numbers come with a big asterisk: They don't include much of the spending by so-called dark-money groups.
Another tracking organization, the nonprofit Sunlight Foundation, has traced about $145 million spent in dark money, but the real number is unknown. Dark-money spending overwhelmingly favors Republicans.
Few states have experienced the political volatility that Colorado has over the last two decades.
Control of the Legislature flipped back and forth. The state see-sawed in presidential contests.
The last two years, though, have been particularly eventful.
In 2013, after Democrats seized control of the statehouse under Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper, lawmakers went on a spree, passing a liberal wish list that thrilled left-leaning constituents but alienated plenty of others, especially rural conservatives upset by a brace of gun-control measures adopted after the July 2012 Aurora theater massacre.
The result, just a few months later, was a nationally publicized recall that ended in the ouster of two Democratic lawmakers, one of them president of the state Senate.
On Tuesday, however, in a little-noticed footnote to Colorados closely watched gubernatorial and U.S. Senate races, the Democrats won back both of those seats, and it wasnt at all close in either Pueblo or Colorado Springs.
At the time, the recall was trumpeted far and wide as a victory for pro-gun activists; a third state senator in the Denver suburbs quit soon after rather than face the prospect of being tossed from office before this years elections.
Now its gun-control activists who are crowing.
Mark Glaze, a consultant to the group Everytown for Gun Safety, said the results showed that when a significant portion of the electorate turns out, rather than a small, agitated minority, support for something like universal background checks for gun buyers is a politically winning position. (That was part of the package Hickenlooper, who was reelected Tuesday, signed into law.)
The message remains that the [National Rifle Association] can bully politicians or buy them for a few pieces of silver but they have no influence over the general public, Glaze said.
More here:
In a turnabout, Colorado Democrats win back seats lost in gun recall