Archive for the ‘Democrat’ Category

House Democrat Mum About Trip to Cyprus for Russia Probe – NBCNews.com

Last week the White House said sending the aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson into the waters around Korea would let the North Korean regime know the U.S. was serious. "We are sending an armada," said President Trump.

Then reporters noticed the Vinson's strike force was sailing away from Korea instead, toward a preplanned joint exercise with the Royal Australian Navy, apparently garbling the intended message to the Kim Jong Un regime.

The confusion started with a minor slip by Defense Secretary James Mattis during an April 11 press briefing. Mattis was asked if the U.S. was sending a signal to North Korea by very publicly redirecting the ship north. Mattis said the ship's change in itinerary had been made public because "she was originally headed in one direction for an exercise, and we canceled our role in that exercise ... We had to explain why she wasn't in that exercise."

In fact, the planned exercise was never canceled, and went forward as scheduled. It was a trip down to Fremantle, Australia, where crew families would've met their loved ones onshore, that was cancelled.

On Wednesday, the Navy quietly slipped a correction into the eight-day-old briefing transcript, inserting a note right after the Secretary's statement about the exercise: "Sic:The ship's port visit to Fremantle, Australia, was cancelled; the exercise with the Royal Australian navy is proceeding as planned."

The aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) transits the Pacific Ocean on Jan. 30, 2017. Tom Tonthat / U.S. Navy via Reuters

Democratic Rep. Mike Quigley of Chicago, an intelligence committee member, doesnt want to say much about his recent trip to Cyprus as part of the Congressional investigation into Russian interference in the election campaign.

All I can say is, its very important to understand how the Russians launder money, Quigley told NBC News. Just look at the public reports the key Russian and American figures all played in Cyprus.

NBC News Richard Engel reported from Cyprus last month that a ban there investigated accounts associated with President Donald Trump's former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, for possible money-laundering.

The trip, Quigley said, underscored for him the idea that the House investigation could use more resources. But, he said, he believes the investigation is back on track, now that Republican committee chairman Devin Nunes has stepped aside pending the resolution of ethics complaints.

Were going to keep at it, Quigley said.

Rep. Mike Quigley, D-Ill., speaks at a news conference in Washington on Nov. 15, 2012. Tom Williams / CQ-Roll Call file

On April 12, a spokesman for former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort said thatafter consulting with federal authorities about whether he should register as a foreign agent because of his past work in Ukraine,Manafort would be taking "appropriate steps."

Many took that to mean Manafort was about to register as an agent under the Foreign Agents Registration Act.

However, when NBC News asked spokesman Jason Maloni directly whether Manafort was going to register, Maloni wouldn't say yes or no.

A week later, there is no record of any filing on the Justice Department's website. Maloni told NBC News, "I don't have an update."

The sad history of the Musudan, a missile once hyped as a game-changer for North Korea, shows why skepticism is always warranted when assessing Pyongyangs military might.

After being rolled out to great fanfare in July 2013, the Musudan wasnt even test-fired until April 2016, during Kim il Sungs 104th birthday celebration. The test failed. Two weeks later, another test, another failure. Later the same day, there was a third test. The Musudan, which is supposed to have a 2,500-mile range, flew 200 meters before crashing.

During a May 2016 test, the Musudan had an even shorter flight it exploded on the launch pad.The missile didn't have its first fully successful launch until June 2016.Andsince then, there have been more failures.Four years after its debut, the U.S. intelligence community estimates the Musudan has an 88 percent failure rate, crashing,toppling, failing to launch, or exploding.

"The Musudan,"said one senior U.S. intelligence official, "comes equipped with a fire extinguisher."

U.S. intelligence officials and private experts are trying to make sense of the missiles they saw displayed in Pyongyang Saturday during a parade to honor the 105th anniversary of the birth of the countrys founder.

The processions vast array of ballistic missiles included some models that hadnt been seen in public before, U.S. intelligence officials said.

"We are currently analyzing the equipment displayed at this year's parade," the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency said in a statement. "While some systems appear consistent with past public displays, others have not been previously observed."

What isnt clear is to what extent the new missiles are functional. In the past, North Korea has paraded fake missiles.

"I still dont know what I saw," said Jeffrey Lewis, a North Korea specialist at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey, in California, who said he recognized "things that are familiar that have been subtly redesigned or in some cases, not so subtly."

Another U.S. intelligence official added, "Pyongyangs elaborate parade of weaponry was likely intended to telegraph to the world and its own people that North Korea maintains a viable deterrent. Unfortunately, behind the goose-stepping soldiers, parade of missiles and belligerent bluster, lies a country that at its core is only held together by its sheer brutality.As with many things with North Korea, the task is to discern the fact from the fiction. Were they displaying real missiles or just big green tubes?"

One of those tubes was the size of an intercontinental ballistic missile, experts said. But its unclear whether it was an actual weapon.Nor is it clear that North Korea has the technology to mount a nuclear warhead on such a missile.

Military experts say this appears to be a North Korean KN-08 Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICMB). Wong Maye-E / AP

A lawyer who represents many of the alleged and convicted al Qaeda terrorists in U.S. custody says nearly all of them view ISIS as "a corruption of Islam" that hurts their religion.

One of Bernard Kleinmans clients a World Trade Center bomber feels so strongly that ISIS is "corrupting Islam" that hes written a 250-page essay repudiating the group, and Kleinman thinks the U.S. government ought to "somehow try to make use of it."

According to an interview with Kleinman in the Sentinel, published by the Combatting Terrorism Center at West Point, Ramzi Yousef "has devoted his efforts to this project solely on the basis that he believes that ISIS does great harm to Islam throughout the world."

Yousef is serving a life sentence for his role in the first World Trade Center bombing, which killed six people in 1993 but failed to topple the Manhattan towers.

Kleinman said his clients at Guantanamo and the federal Supermax facility in Colorado disagree with ISIS attacks on Shiites and dont believe that ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is really a descendant of the Prophet Mohammeds tribe.

Kleinman said he thinks the U.S. ought to use Yousefs massive essay as a force for good and make it publicly available. "If you can create doubt in just one wannabe ISIS recruit about the religious legitimacy of ISISs actions, and by doing that save lives, then I think it would be worth it."

Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, shown in these undated file photos, was sentenced to life in prison without parole for masterminding the 1993 World Trade Center explosion and a plot to bomb a dozen U.S. passenger airliners. U.S. District Judge Kevin Duffy sentenced Yousef to 240 years in prison, with restrictions that amount to solitary confinement, and said that only proven family members could visit him.

Earlier today Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe warned Parliament that Pyongyang might be able to kill Japan's citizens with poison-tipped missiles.

"There is a possibility that North Korea already has a capability to deliver missiles with sarin as warheads," said Abe. His alarm was echoed by warnings in South Korean media.

Foreign militaries and intelligence agencies have long believed North Korea is deeply involved in chemical weapons research and production. In 2015, the Pentagon told Congress North Korea "likely possesses a CW stockpile" and likely had "the capability to produce nerve, blister, blood, and choking agents."

The Pentagon also said"North Korea probably could employ CW agents by modifying a variety of conventional munitions, including artillery and ballistic missiles."

Abe was going a step further, suggesting the North has now actually weaponized sarin, the same nerve agent used by Syria on civilians last week.

The Japanese are very aware of what nerve agents can do. In 1995, a Japanese cult killed 12 people and made thousands ill on rush-hour trains with sarin. And South Korea, China and Japan are all in range of North Korean non-nuclear missiles.

Without providing specifics, U.S. officials told NBC News that what Abe fears is within the realm of possibility the North is technically capable of delivering sarin by missile. But the same officials note the U.S. does not have "certainty" on what chemical weapons the North possesses, in what quantities, or whether their chemicals are weaponized, because the North continues to be a "difficult intelligence target."

How big is the GBU-43 bomb that the U.S.dropped today on an ISIS tunnel complex in Afganistan?

It's more than 10 times bigger than the next biggest bomb in the U.S. conventional arsenal, but not big at all compared to a nuclear weapon.

Hans Kristensen, director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists, said the explosive power of even the smallest U.S. nuke, the B-61 bomb, is "an order of magnitude" larger than the GBU-43.

"The smallest nuclear weapon in the U.S. arsenal has an explosive yield of 0.3 kilotons of TNT, meaning 300 tons. This bomb, at 21,000 pounds, is only 10 tons. It doesn't come close," said Kristensen. "Even the biggest conventional bomb we can load onto a plane is miniscule."

The B-61 bomb, only deployed in Europe, is a tactical weapon that can be used to destroy city centers or large-scale troop concentrations.

The GBU-43, also know as a MOAB (Massive Ordnance Air Blast) is also about half the size of the smallest U.S. nuke ever built, the Davy Crockett artillery shell, which was retired in the 1960's.

Ironically, Thursday's bombing occurs during a defense community debate on whether to build smaller nukes. "We have people arguing for new mini nukes," said Kristensen. "Here you have a case where the U.S. felt all it needed was a conventional whopper."

The GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast bomb in an image provided by Eglin Air Force Base. The Pentagon says U.S. forces in Afghanistan dropped the military's largest non-nuclear bomb on an Islamic State target in Afghanistan. A Pentagon spokesman said it was the first-ever combat use of the bomb, known as the GBU-43, which he said contains 11 tons of explosives. The Air Force calls it the Massive Ordnance Air Blast bomb. Based on the acronym, it has been nicknamed the "Mother Of All Bombs." Eglin Air Force Base via AP

Two men from the Chicago suburb of Zion have been charged in federal court with conspiring to provide material support to ISIS.

Joseph D. Jones, AKA Yusuf Abdulhaqq, and Edward Schimenti, AKA Abdul Wali, both 35, are accused of pledging allegiance to ISIS, providing cellphones they believed would be used in explosives, and driving an undercover source to O'Hare airport with the belief the source was headed to Syria to fight for ISIS.

According to the criminal complaint, Schimenti told the source to "drench that land with ... blood."

Court papers say the pair befriended three individuals thinking they were fellow ISIS devotees, but two were undercover FBI employees and the third was cooperating with law enforcement.

The men face up to 20 years in prison if convicted.

The story spread in bond markets in New York and Asia on Monday. China, according to a rumor that circulated largely via social media, was "massing" 150,000 troops on its border with North Korea. The timing of the alleged troop movements, coupled with reports of possible U.S.-China discussions of what to do about Pyongyangs nuclear arsenal, was cited by analysts as one reason interest rates on bonds were creeping up.

Was there any substance to the rumor? Not according to senior U.S. military and intelligence officials. There was no "massing." As many as 250,000 Chinese troops are always operating in northeastern China, and the U.S. did not see any sign Beijing had moved them closer to the Yalu River, which separates North Korea from China.

Financial analysts were not surprised. Fake financial news has a longer history that any other kind of false reporting. Some people repeat rumors because they believe them to be fact. Others, however, may be tempted by the knowledge that "news" of impending doom can move markets. There is money to be made before the news is proven true or false. The advent of social media and high-speed trading just adds to the possibilities.

One Pentagon official told NBC News, in language too profane to publish, that that's exactly what he thought happened with the China troop tale.

See original here:
House Democrat Mum About Trip to Cyprus for Russia Probe - NBCNews.com

Trump Rips Top Democrat Jon Ossoff in Georgia Special Election – NBCNews.com

A day ahead of a high-profile special election in Georgia, President Donald Trump inserted himself in the race with a sharp attack on the top Democratic candidate.

On Twitter Monday, Trump criticized Jon Ossoff, who is leading a crowded field of candidates in the race to replace former Rep. Tom Price, who stepped down to become the president's Secretary of Health and Human Services.

"The super Liberal Democrat in the Georgia Congressioal [sic] race tomorrow wants to protect criminals, allow illegal immigration and raise taxes!" Trump tweeted.

Ossoff responded with a statement, "While I'm glad the President is interested in the race, he is misinformed. I'm focused on bringing fresh leadership, accountability, and bipartisan problem solving to Washington to cut wasteful spending and grow metro Atlanta's economy into the Silicon Valley of the South."

Ossoff is hoping to break 50 percent in Tuesday's unusual all-party primary. If he falls short of that threshold but still comes in first, the Democrat will face off against the second-place finisher, who most likely will be a Republican, in a June runoff. If there's a runoff, Ossoff would be seen as the underdog in the conservative district.

Recent polls show Ossoff running several percentage points below the 50% threshold.

Trump's unpopularity made this race competitive and he's loomed over it since picking Price to join his Cabinet late last year. Many are watching the race closely as a early indicator of potential anti-Trump Democratic wave in next year's midterm elections.

Related: Trump's shadow looms over the special election

Georgia's 6th Congressional District, a stretch of wealthy and highly educated suburbs North of Atlanta, is a traditional Republican stronghold. But Trump only narrowly won the district in November after Mitt Romney had carried by over 20 percentage points in 2012. It's not hard to find local Republican voters displeased with Trump's presidency so far.

That's caused most of the 11 Republican candidates in the race to steer clear of Trump, keenly aware of his low approval ratings.

Ossoff too has mostly stopped talking about Trump, to whom he owes so much of his success.

The 30-year-old first-time-candidate kicked off his campaign with a fundraising plea to "Make Trump Furious" and went on to raise a record-shattering $8.3 million in the first three months of the year. Over 90% of that came from outside district as liberals across the country contributed to his campaign as a way to fight Trump.

But the anti-Trump message got Ossoff only so far, so he has switched to a nonpartisan message of pragmatism that he hopes will make conservative-leaning independents and soft Republicans feel comfortable voting for a Democrat.

National Republicans have responded by trying to portray Ossoff as Nancy Pelosi "yes man" and left-wing radical to prevent those same voters from switching sides.

In that sense, Trump's tweet is on-message and may be cheered by even Trump-skeptical Republicans for using his large megaphone to inject that message into the bloodstream the day before the critical vote.

Read more:
Trump Rips Top Democrat Jon Ossoff in Georgia Special Election - NBCNews.com

Assembly Democrat stripped of committee chairmanship after voting … – Sacramento Bee


Sacramento Bee
Assembly Democrat stripped of committee chairmanship after voting ...
Sacramento Bee
Nearly two weeks after breaking with fellow Democrats to vote against a bill raising California fuel taxes, Assemblyman Rudy Salas of Bakersfield has lost the ...
The Latest: California Democrat removed from committee postWichita Eagle

all 6 news articles »

See the article here:
Assembly Democrat stripped of committee chairmanship after voting ... - Sacramento Bee

Maxine Waters, Donald Trump and impeachment: One Democrat is … – Salon

Over the weekend tens of thousands of Americans once more took to the streets to protest Donald Trump. In major cities and small towns across the country, citizens demanded that their president do what every president for the past 40 years has done: release his tax returns. Trumps response was to petulantly tweet that he did the impossible for a Republican by winning the Electoral College vote (the opposite is true; just ask George W. Bush) and suggesting that someone look into who paid the protesters because the election is over.

Evidently he thought that winning the election meant everyone would march in lockstep singing We love you, President Trump! like they do in North Korea. Hed better get used to protests because they arent going to stop. (The March for Sciencenext weekend should really make him mad.)

The anti-Trump resistance is very much a grassroots effort, but there are leaders emerging. One of the most vocal is Rep. Maxine Waters, a Democrat who represents Los Angeles. Appearing at the Washington Tax Day march lastSaturday, Waters put it bluntly: I dont respect this president, she said.I dont trust this president. Hes not working in the best interests of the American people. I will fight every day until he is impeached! Then she led the crowd in a chant of Impeach 45! It doesnt get any more resistant than that.

Waters has always been a tough and forceful politician, unafraid to take a position and speak her mind. She first came to national attention after the violence following the acquittal of police officers in the beating of Rodney King when she went on TV and explained to America through gritted teeth that the African-American community in L.A. hadnt just exploded out of nowhere. It was a message a lot of people didnt want to hear, but she made sure they receivedit anyway. Shehas been a thorn in the side of conservatives ever since then, once inspiring Ann Coulter to venomously spewthat without affirmative action Waters wouldnt have a job that didnt involve wearing a paper hat. Right-wingers often lose their composure when confronted with such a strong, unapologetic African-American woman who is unafraid of getting right up in their faces.

Waters has been appearing on TV again lately, and she has plenty to say about all the various Trump scandals. Her message is very simple: Trump must be impeached. Obviously Republicans are outraged (as usual), insisting that such talk is downright seditious. Very few Democrats are ready to join her at this point either. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi believes such talk is premature at best; she hassaidthat Trump is incoherent, incompetent and reckless, but has insisted those arent grounds for impeachment.According to Clare Malone at FiveThirtyEight, Waters understands that Pelosi has an obligation to stay above the fray buthas said, I dont have the same responsibility. She sees herself in a completely different role.

It may seem that Waters just has a pugilistic personality and is out front because its her political style to mix it up. But there is a strategy at work in this. After all, it wasnt that long ago that a president was impeached for only the second time in history and this was over a crime that seems laughably insubstantial compared to the possibilities that Donald Trump could face. Just for starters, Trumps presidential campaign is being investigated in a counterintelligence probe, andthe list of his conflicts of interest are so wide-ranging and so deep that almost anything could implicate him in a corruption scandal. Impeachment is really not a far-fetched proposition.

Back in the 1990s, President Bill Clintons administration was under siege from almost the moment he took office. There was one small-bore, semi-fictitious scandal after another, from Filegate to Travelgateand Haircutgate to Vince Fosters suicide and, of course, the ancient Arkansas land deal known as Whitewater, from years before Clinton ran for president. The media lapped them up, reporting each new development with breathless excitement, piling them on top of one another until it seemed as though there wasnt anything else happening in the world.

Some of the motivation for all this was simple partisan payback. Republican Richard Nixon was a crook whohad been run out of Washington and the GOP-ers wereyearning to return the favor. Their defeat of the Democrat Jimmy Carter in 1980 was nice but it wasnt enough. Republicanswanted to rub the Democrats smug, self-righteous faces in the dirt and what the political establishment considered to be the Southern Gothic fever swamp that accompanied Clinton to Washington offered an excellent opportunity. But in spite of the Republicans deep desire to get Clinton, their primary game plan was merely to force his resignation (as had happened with Nixon). There was very little discussion of impeachment through all those years of endless scandalmongering.

Only one man, Rep. Bob Barr, R-Ga.,kept bringing it updespite strong pushback from then House Speaker Newt Gingrich and every other member of the GOP leadership. House Majority Leader Dick Armey, R-Texas, said at the time, I dont think we have the kind of evidentiary basis to be talking about impeachment at this time. I dont really think you should, when its such an important matter and its frankly still in the abstract.

Barr kept at it. Before anyone had heard of the name Monica Lewinsky or read the salacious report ultimately produced by independent counsel Ken Starr, Barr had introducedHouse Resolution 304, directing the House Judiciary Committee to investigate whether grounds existed to impeach the president. When the Lewinsky scandal broke, unanticipated by anyone (including Barr), the groundwork had been laid.

Waters is following the Barr model. Impeachment is the nuclear option of nuclear options, when it comes to Congress confronting the president. Its the only means by which a president can be removed from office for cause and it isnt easy to do, especially when the presidents party holds the majority. (Only two presidents have ever been impeached by the House Clinton and Andrew Johnson and neither was convicted in the Senate, where a two-thirds majority is required.) But if one of Trumps many scandals should end up implicating him in a crime, its important that the Democrats and the American people be ready for it. Waters is getting the I-word out there into the atmosphere and priming Trumps political opposition. Its a job that takes guts and foresight and shes good at it.

If the Democrats can pull off a wave election in 2018 and take back the House, they will be ready to follow an impeachment investigation wherever it leads. That will largely be thanks to Maxine Waters.

Read the original:
Maxine Waters, Donald Trump and impeachment: One Democrat is ... - Salon

Trump Renews Attacks on Democrats and News Media – Voice of America

U.S. President Donald Trump renewed his attacks Monday on two frequent targets opposition Democrats and the news media.

In one of several comments on his Twitter account, Trump said, "The first 90 days of my presidency has exposed the total failure of the last eight years of foreign policy!" under former President Barack Obama. "So true."

Trump did not cite any specific successes, but in the last two weeks launched a missile attack on Syria in response to its use of chemical weapons, something Obama never did, and praised the U.S. military for its use of the biggest non-nuclear bomb ever against Islamic State bunkers in Afghanistan.

Trump, a business mogul turned Republican politician, also offered a literary review, praising "a great book for your reading enjoyment." The joke book, "Reasons to Vote for Democrats: A Comprehensive Guide," consists of more than 260 blank pages.

In a congressional election set for Tuesday, Trump contended that "the super Liberal Democrat ...wants to protect criminals, allow illegal immigration and raise taxes!"

In another tweet, Trump, who often has assailed news coverage of the first three months of his presidency, said, "The Fake Media (not Real Media) has gotten even worse since the election. Every story is badly slanted. We have to hold them to the truth!"

The president did not cite any specific story that had drawn his ire, but on Sunday said the news media had downplayed the election last week of a new Republican congressman from the Midwestern state of Kansas in a heavily Republican district after a Democrat lost the contest.

U.S. President Donald Trump blows a whistle to start the White House Easter Egg Roll alongside first lady Melania Trump and his son Barron, right, on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, April 17, 2017.

Trump spent the Easter weekend at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, returning to Washington for Monday's annual Easter Egg Roll for children and their families on the White House lawn.

Go here to read the rest:
Trump Renews Attacks on Democrats and News Media - Voice of America