Archive for the ‘Democrat’ Category

Senate Democrats unify around congressional probe of Trump ties to Russia – Chicago Tribune

Senate Democratic leaders agreed Wednesday to a bipartisan probe inside Congress of allegations that people linked to President Donald Trump - including ousted national security adviser Michael Flynn - had frequent contacts with Russia during and after the 2016 presidential campaign.

Democrats agreed to push forward with an ongoing Intelligence Committee investigation into Russia's purported activities into the election, expanding the probe to include contacts made by Flynn and perhaps other Trump campaign officials with the Kremlin. They united around this course of action despite pressure from some Democrats to demand an independent commission to pursue the matter from outside Congress.

The decision was made at a Democratic conference meeting Wednesday morning hastily called by Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (N.Y.). Schumer aimed to get his colleagues on the same page following a fresh report from the New York Times that Trump campaign aides spoke frequently with Russian intelligence operatives during the campaign. Flynn resigned Monday night after The Washington Post revealed that he spoke about sanctions with Russia's ambassador to the United States after the election.

Schumer; Sen. Mark Warner (Va.), the ranking Democrat on the Intelligence Committee; and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.), the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, explained their stance afterward in a joint appearance.

They demanded that all committee investigations related to allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 election and contacts with Trump surrogates be bipartisan and comprehensive and that panel members be "committed to making their findings as public as possible."

Democrats also want the Justice Department - specifically, the FBI - to continue investigating the allegations that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in an attempt to help Trump win. But they are insisting that former senator Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., now the attorney general, recuse himself from the proceedings.

Leading Senate Democrats - some of whom advocated for an independent commission - acknowledged that isn't possible unless Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., signs off on such a move.

"I'll be perfectly blunt: We need to have Sen. McConnell's blessing before we'll get a commission done. He's not there," said Senate Foreign Relations Committee ranking Democrat Benjamin Cardin (Md.), who has been pushing for an independent commission. "I think Senator Schumer, if he had his druthers, would take a commission immediately - but we can't get it."

Schumer had previously endorsed the idea of an independent commission to investigate suspected links between Russia and the Trump campaign. Other Democrats feared risking what precious momentum they had built for an investigation at all by pushing to take such a probe outside Congress.

"We've already started this process; we're already starting to review the raw intelligence; we're well down this path," Warner told reporters Wednesday. "I understand others look at other things - I think that would greatly delay the process, and what I think everyone wants, regardless of where we stand, is we want to get this done expeditiously."

Warner insisted that he has "faith in Senator Burr's commitment" to pursue the investigation fairly, adding that, "If at any point we're not able to get the full information and we're not pursuing the information to where the intelligence leads, that we'll look at other options."

But for other Democrats, Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr's, R-N.C., integrity isn't the issue - McConnell is.

"I'm just not convinced that Mitch McConnell is going to let the Intelligence Committee get to the real story," said Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., who advocated an independent commission.

Senate Republican leaders, meanwhile, responded to Flynn's resignation by saying that the Intelligence Committee probably will examine the circumstances. They reiterated that position Wednesday.

"I don't think we need a select committee. We know how to do our work. We have an Intelligence Committee," McConnell said in an interview on MSNBC.

One Republican, however, said lawmakers should establish a "joint select committee" - consisting of members of the House and the Senate - to examine the allegations in the Times report.

"Now, was this outside the norm? Was this something damaging to the country?" Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said in a Fox News Channel interview Wednesday morning. "I don't know, but if there were contacts between Russian officials and Trump campaign operatives that [were] inappropriate, then it would be time for the Congress to form a joint select commission to get to the bottom of all things Russia and Trump."

Democrats are insisting on some ground rules for the investigations, which could take place in multiple panels.

They are demanding that the Trump administration preserve all its records from the transition period, citing "real concern" that officials might "try to cover up ties to Russia" by deleting emails, texts and other documents establishing links between the Trump White House and the Kremlin, Schumer said. Democrats also are demanding that Flynn, former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort and other campaign officials make themselves available to testify before the committees.

But Democrats' demands still depend in large part on what Republican leadership is willing to accommodate.

Republican leaders have not ruled out calling on Flynn and other campaign or administration officials to testify. But a majority of the Senate Intelligence Committee would have to agree to issue a subpoena compelling such testimony.

The GOP is divided over the revelations that Flynn misled his superiors about the substance of his conversations with Russian ambassador to the United States Sergey Kislyak during the transition period. Some Republicans insist that the real scandal is not the fact that Flynn lied about whether he discussed sanctions with Kislyak - but that those conversations ever became public.

"The leaks are coming from somewhere, and the surveillance came from somewhere . . . obviously it's coming from people that don't want to see this administration succeed," said Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs committee chairman Ron Johnson, R-Wis.

He added that incoming administration members like Flynn "would be derelict in their duty not to be reaching out and getting up to speed" through conversations with people like the Russian ambassador - though, Johnson stressed, he didn't know the substance of those conversations.

That line from certain GOP leaders has infuriated other Republicans.

"All of us know that leaks happen in this town, and we all don't like it - but the fact is that you now have a much larger issue to address," said Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain, R-Ariz. "The national security adviser lied to the vice president of the United States. That's a pretty serious event."

Over in the House, Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., is already prioritizing investigating leaks over Flynn's contacts with Kremlin officials. And leading Democrats are powerless to stop them.

"Frankly it's safer for them to talk about leaks than be critical of the president," House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said of his GOP colleagues. "There's still a lot they want from this president in the form of tax cuts and regulatory giveaways, so I think they're hoping to get what they can get before they have to confront him."

Democrats in the Senate worry about facing the same fate, should GOP leaders decide they have bigger priorities than Trump's Russia ties.

"I'll acknowledge that Sen. Burr is moving in the right direction, and my lack of faith is probably not so much in Senator Burr but in Republican leadership," Murphy said. "I ultimately think their priority is getting a trickle-down tax cut done, and a repeal of the Affordable Care Act, not getting to the bottom of this scandal."

Read more from the original source:
Senate Democrats unify around congressional probe of Trump ties to Russia - Chicago Tribune

Democrat eyes law on removing presidents – The Boston Globe

Rep. Earl Blumenauer of Oregon.

WASHINGTON Perhaps in a bit of wishful thinking, a House Democrat says he plans to form a working group to clarify and strengthen the 25th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which lays out presidential succession and the steps the executive branch can take to remove a president from office.

Rep. Earl Blumenauer of Oregon says hes initiating this effort in response to Republican Donald Trumps presidency, even though there have been no signs of an effort to remove him.

Advertisement

Like many people, Ive noticed a renewed interest in the 25th Amendment as weve seen erratic behavior out of the White House, Blumenauer said in a statement. As I examined the amendment, it became clear that in the case of mental or emotional incapacity, there is a glaring flaw.

The 25th Amendment was ratified in 1967 as a response to President John F. Kennedys death in 1963. It made clear that the vice president becomes president if a president is removed from office or dies or resigns, and that the new president nominates a new vice president.

Get Political Happy Hour in your inbox:

Your afternoon shot of politics, sent straight from the desk of Joshua Miller.

It also allows members of the executive branch to essentially force Congress to vote on whether to remove the president from office. The amendment states that the vice president and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide can begin the process of removal if they believe the president is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.

The flaw, Blumenauer says, is that the Cabinet may be fired by the president, undermining this ostensible check on an unstable president. He notes that the some other body is undefined, and there is no guidance for how it should operate. Blumenauer says he believes that living former presidents and vice presidents could form that body.

Its unclear if anyone else has signed on to Blumenauers effort. Republican Vice President Mike Pence is in line to succeed Trump.

Go here to read the rest:
Democrat eyes law on removing presidents - The Boston Globe

GOP Rep. Sean Duffy will not challenge Democrat Tammy Baldwin for US Senate – Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Rep. Sean Duffy, R-Wausau, speaks at the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Fla. in 2012.(Photo: USA TODAY NETWORK)

The Republican race to challenge U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin in 2018 was thrown wide open Thursday when U.S. Rep. Sean Duffy of Wausau announced he would not run againstthe first-term Democrat.

After much prayer and deliberation, Rachel and I have decided that this is not the right time for me to run for Senate," Duffy said in a statement. "We have eight great kids and family always comes first."

"Baldwin will be beat because her radically liberal Madison record and ideas are out of syncwith Wisconsin," Duffy said. "I look forward to helping our Republican nominee defeat her. Ill continue to work my heart out for the families of the 7th District, and Im excited about the great things we will accomplish with our united Republican government.

With his early support of President Donald Trump and formidable fundraising skills, Duffy was viewed by many in the Republican Party as the front-runner to take on Baldwin.

By quickly announcing his decision to skip the race, Duffy leaves plenty of time and space for others to gather support from activists andmajor donors.

Dan Bice and Mary Spicuzza discuss possible reasons that Duffy doesnt want to take on Tammy Baldwin and where that leaves the Republicans.

The list of potential candidates includes Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald, Madison businessman Eric Hovde, state Rep. Dale Kooyenga (R-Brookfield), state Sen. Leah Vukmir (R-Brookfield) and Marine veteran and Milwaukee-area businessman Kevin Nicholson.

The state Democratic Party appeared to relish the prospect of GOP infighting.

"With out-of-state money piling up to support tea party darling David Clarke, legislators across the state preparing to run, and their top candidate dropping out, the Republican establishment in Washington is scrambling to avoid a divisive, messy Republican primary in Wisconsin," state Democrats said in a statement. "No matter what circus emerges, Tammy Baldwin will continue to stand up to the powerful interests in Washington and fight for a Wisconsin economy that works for everyone, not just those at the top."

Party spokeswoman Gillian Drummond was referring to Milwaukee County Sheriff David A. Clarke Jr., who has not indicated an interest in the race.Journal Sentinel columnist Dan Bice reported Thursdaythat four out-of-state groups are raising money to draft the outspoken conservative Clarke to run against Baldwin.

Fitzgerald is a key power broker in Madison and burnished his credentials among the party's grassroots with his early backing of Trump and his critical support in 2015 for so-called right-to-work legislation, which ended the practice of private sectorworkers being required to pay union fees as a condition of employment.

Fitzgerald didn't agree to interviews Thursday or say whether he wouldrun, though he did tweet about Duffy's decision: "I know this was a difficult decision by@RepSeanDuffyand am confident Wisconsin will continue to benefit from his leadership in@HouseGOP."

Hovde put up a strong challenge in 2012 when he finished second to former Gov. Tommy Thompson in a GOP Senate primary. He has the deepest pockets in the potential field and could kick-start his campaign by self-funding. Hovde praised Duffy: "He's a good man. Iam sure he made the decision based upon all the factors in the race and what's best for his family."

Kooyenga and Vukmir are conservative legislators who had skilled jobs outside of politics and whoare popular with the GOP base in southeastern Wisconsin. Vukmir is a registered nurse who worked for years as a pediatric nurse practitioner and who still teaches classes. She's a board member of the American Legislative Exchange Council, a group that works with lawmakers and corporations to promote conservative legislation in statehouses around the country.

Vukmir said she was already considering a primary run against Duffy but doesn't have a timeline to decide whether to do so. To run for U.S. Senate, she would have to give up the state Senate seat where she hasworked on health and education issues.

"I have been strongly considering a run for some time," Vukmir said. "Wisconsin needs a consistently strong Republican voice who has a track record of delivering, and I have that."

Kooyenga, a certified public accountant and veteran of the Iraq War as a U.S. Army Reserve member, said hes been asked by people about running for the U.S. Senate.

Itd definitely be after the budget, Kooyenga said of any Senate race decision.

Waiting also gives Kooyenga theadvantage of seeing whether there's a chance to run for Vukmirs state Senate seat.

Nicholson has been quietly making the rounds to gather support. A former national president of the College Democrats of America, he served as a captain in the U.S. Marine Corps and was deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. He is a principal at a management consulting firm.

He still will need to introduce himself to Wisconsinites his Twitter account, for example, had fewerthan 100 followers as of Thursday afternoon.

"My family and I are strongly considering a run for U.S. Senate against Tammy Baldwin," Nicholson said in a statement. "Here in Wisconsin, we've had years and years of career politicians like Tammy Baldwin. I'm an outsider and I know firsthand the challenges facing Wisconsin families, and the sacrifices made by those who help keep us safe."

Republicans are now girding for a primary battle.

"There are strong potential candidates ready to draw a sharp contrast with SenatorBaldwin, who is out of touch with Wisconsin values and in big trouble as a result," Republican Party of Wisconsin spokesman Alec Zimmerman said in a statement.

"After 20 years of talk in Washington, it's not clear what she's done but protect the Washington status quo and reject real reform for Wisconsin's working families.

Read or Share this story: http://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2017/02/16/gop-rep-sean-duffy-not-challenge-democrat-tammy-baldwin-us-senate/97986998/

Read more:
GOP Rep. Sean Duffy will not challenge Democrat Tammy Baldwin for US Senate - Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Capitol Hill Buzz: Democrat eyes law on removing presidents – Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Top News

Associated Press

Posted February 17, 2017

February 16, 2017

Updated February 17, 2017 1:15am

ASSOCIATED PRESS

In this March 3, 2017, file photo, Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington. Perhaps in a bit of wishful thinking, a Blumenauer says he plans to form a working group to clarify and strengthen the 25th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which lays out presidential succession and the steps the executive branch can take to remove a president from office.

WASHINGTON >> Perhaps in a bit of wishful thinking, a House Democrat says he plans to form a working group to clarify and strengthen the 25th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which lays out presidential succession and the steps the executive branch can take to remove a president from office.

Rep. Earl Blumenauer of Oregon says hes initiating this effort in response to Republican Donald Trumps presidency, even though there have been no signs of an effort to remove him.

Like many people, Ive noticed a renewed interest in the 25th Amendment as weve seen erratic behavior out of the White House, Blumenauer said in a statement. As I examined the amendment, it became clear that in the case of mental or emotional incapacity, there is a glaring flaw.

The 25th Amendment was ratified in 1967 as a response to President John F. Kennedys death in 1963. It made clear that the vice president becomes president if a president is removed from office or dies or resigns, and that the new president nominates a new vice president.

It also allows members of the executive branch to essentially force Congress to vote on whether to remove the president from office. The amendment states that the vice president and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide can begin the process of removal if they believe the president is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.

The flaw, Blumenauer says, is that the Cabinet may be fired by the president, undermining this ostensible check on an unstable president. He notes that the some other body is undefined, and there is no guidance for how it should operate. Blumenauer says he believes that living former presidents and vice presidents could form that body.

Its unclear if anyone else has signed on to Blumenauers effort. Republican Vice President Mike Pence is in line to succeed Trump.

View post:
Capitol Hill Buzz: Democrat eyes law on removing presidents - Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Esty named top Democrat on veterans’ benefits committee – Danbury News Times

U.S. Rep. Elizabeth Esty and World War II veteran Robert Lindner.

U.S. Rep. Elizabeth Esty and World War II veteran Robert Lindner.

Esty named top Democrat on veterans benefits committee

U.S. Rep. Elizabeth Esty has been named the top Democrat on a House of Representatives subcommittee overseeing disability assistance for veterans, according to a release.

Esty, a three-term Democrat who represents greater Danbury as part of the Fifth Congressional District, will oversee compensation, pensions, and benefits for veterans as the ranking member of the subcommittee, the release said.

I know her to be a dedicated and passionate advocate for veterans in her district, and I am confident that as ranking member she will be able to extend that commitment to every veteran in the U.S. said Rep. Tim Walz, D-MN, the top Democrat on the House Veterans Affairs Committee, in a prepared statement.

Esty said one of the honors of her job was working with veterans.

There is a great deal of work ahead to ensure that every veteran who serves this country receives the support and care they deserve, Esty said in a prepared statement. Im ready and eager to partner with my colleagues on the subcommittee to help all veterans and military families claim their rightful benefits with less red tape and fewer delays.

Read more:
Esty named top Democrat on veterans' benefits committee - Danbury News Times