Archive for the ‘Communism’ Category

Ilhan and the Communists – Power Line

Scott noted earlier Ilhan Omars bizarre response to the fact that a member of the Minneapolis Somali community who knows Omar well has confirmed that she married her brother for fraudulent purposes. First she falsely asserted that Somali Abdi Nur was paid to smear her. Next she asserted that the whole thing is a Zionist conspiracy.

That reeks of desperation, obviously. I just want to add one more log to the fire. Omars source for her crazed tirade was a piece in something called Humans4HumanLife, which she tweeted. You really should read the whole Humans piece at the link. If you are looking for anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, youve come to the right place.

Still, one funny thing about the Humans4HumanLife piece is that the author doesnt seem at all certain that the allegations against Omar are untrue:

Undeniably, no one is immune to making mistakes, or even regrets.

Her private life is no ones business. It is of no reflection on her sincerity, integrity nor her abilities.

Its impossible for anyone on the public stage to achieve everyones expectations all the time. As a human being, its impossible to be everything to everyone every time.

Some of us, though, do manage to avoid marrying our siblings for fraudulent purposes.

Never having heard of Humans4HumansLife, I was curious about the organization. It is obscure, and, it turns out, deservedly so. The fact that Omar apparently reads its stuff is itself revealing. Humans Facebook page starts with the enemy collaboration post about the supposedly Jewish conspiracy to disclose the fact that Ilhan married her brother. But its next Facebook post celebrates Communism:

I had never heard of Mr. Pansare, but he was an Indian communist.

If you keep scrolling, you see the usual left-wing stuff: anti-Israel, anti-Brexit, anti-law enforcement. And, apparently, pro-ISIS:

Relentlessly crucifiedthat refers to revocation of her British citizenshipsimply for joining ISIS. Simply!

Ilhan Omar is an extremist. She thinks nothing, apparently, of citing openly Communist friends in support of her anti-Semitic fantasies. She hates the United States and Israel, but has no particular problem with Islamic terrorists who simply join ISIS. If a Republican Congressman linked to a white supremacist web site to defend himself against a well-supported allegation of corruptionsomething almost impossible to imagineevery news outlet in America would come crashing down on him, and he would be out of Congress within 24 hours. Ilhan Omar did something worse. She linked to and cited a Communist, openly anti-Semitic, and terrorist supporting web site to deflect well-founded (frankly, obviously true) allegations of multi-level corruption: marriage fraud, immigration fraud, tax fraud, among others. And yet the Democratic Party press has been, so far, silent.

See more here:
Ilhan and the Communists - Power Line

Why does the Chinese Communist party want my credit history? – The Spectator USA

I was one of them.

One of the 147 million Americans who had their information compromised in the epic 2017 Equifax data breach. It was one of the largest hacks in history, leaking the names, social security numbers, addresses, and credit history of over a third of the country.

At first, we were led to believe it was the result of sloppy cybersecurity and greedy hackers who wanted credit card data.

But now, according to last weeks indictment from the Justice Department, we know it was the handiwork of four members of Chinas military.

To think it was a few renegade black hat hackers with expensive tastes was upsetting enough, but now to learn it was the long arm of the Chinese Communist party? This is serious.

What do the Chinese communists want with my credit history? Is it to spam me with emails or offers in the mail? Or, worst-case scenario, to add me and millions of my fellow Americans to their social score database so our behaviors can be ranked and judged?

Most of the fallout between liberal democratic nations and China in the last few years has been over governmental policy: trade spats, currency manipulation, and theft of intellectual property. These high-level issues were problematic enough, and now it seems Chinas desire to exert control over the US is directly affecting the people.

Weve known for years that Chinese Communist Party censors have made creeping demands in Hollywood: Tibetan monks replaced with Celtic ones in Marvels Doctor Strange, Tom Cruises bomber jacket with the Taiwan flag removed in the Top Gun sequel, and cut scenes in Bohemian Rhapsody to obscure that Freddie Mercury was gay.

When Quentin Tarantino refused to edit his latest movie, Once Upon a Timein Hollywood, to please Chinese censors, they pulled its release date. It was eventually shipped to Chinese cinemas, but its uncertain if portions of the film were cut.

China has the worlds second-largest movie market, making it no surprise that with Chinese capital comes more aggressive demands for censorship. Will they allow any criticism of Chinese communism, or even praise of liberal democracies? What about a potential movie about the brave Hong Kong protesters fighting for their liberties?

Mike Pompeo recently warned American governors to be wary of any dealings with institutions or businesses with significant ties to China.

Theyve labeled each of you friendly, hardline or ambiguous, he said. And, in fact, whether you are viewed by the Communist party of China as friendly or hardline, know that its working you, know that its working the team around you.

These revelations about the insidious nature of the Chinese government come at a critical time.

The Hong Kong protests continue after months of mounting force from police. Fears of the spread of the Coronavirus have emboldened Chinese authorities to fully exercise their authoritarianism: canceling the Chinese New Year, a complete lockdown of Wuhan, a city of 11 million people, and arrests of doctors and health workers who shared their concerns about the virus on social media.

The Chinese people, at least, are beginning to wake up to the antics of their government. Li Wenliang, a doctor who was threatened by police for fear mongering about the Coronavirus, which later took his life, was labeled a hero for his efforts to spread the truth about the disease. But it will take many more acts of courage to cause a total paradigm shift in the minds of the people.

From the theft of credit information to entertainment censorship and brutal authoritarian crackdowns, its clear that citizens and consumers in liberal democracies have something to fear in the rise of the Chinese Communist party.

For our part, we must continue to champion our free societies as bulwarks against the authoritarian regime. We must fight for the ideas and principles that have helped make liberal democratic countries great stewards of our liberties.

Yal Ossowski is a writer, deputy director of the Consumer Choice Center, and a director at 21Democracy.

Read more from the original source:
Why does the Chinese Communist party want my credit history? - The Spectator USA

Lithuanian Immigrant to Bernie Supporters: They Should Go to a Socialist Country and Live There a While – Breitbart

A Lithuanian immigrant who attended President Donald Trumps rally in Las Vegas, Nevada, on Friday spoke to Breitbart News and warned of the dangers of communism, saying Bernie Sanders (I-VT) supporters should go to a socialist country to understand what it is like.

I thought America is free, said Daiva Gaulyte, an immigrant from Lithuania who has lived under communism. Ive been in a communist country. I dont want to have it here.

The communist took away my grandparents land, they transported them to Siberia, and then when they got all this land, they didnt know what to do with them because theyre lazy, Gaulyte continued. Communists are lazy.

There is nothing they can do with that land so they gave lands back to work on it, but it was very difficult to have any kind of profit, but you could work on it because the lands were just sitting there and communists didnt know what to do with it.

Gaulyte also explained how she was restricted from viewing certain American materials under the rule of communism.

We were not allowed to watch American movies, she said. We had to hide if someone gets American movie, we close the curtains and watch it so nobody knows.

Gaulyte also offered advice to those who support Sanders bid to become the next president.

I feel sorry that they do not understand what they are doing, she concluded. Maybe if they really want to experience socialism, they should go to the socialist country and live there for a while so they know what it is.

Follow Kyle on Twitter @RealKyleMorris and Facebook.

Originally posted here:
Lithuanian Immigrant to Bernie Supporters: They Should Go to a Socialist Country and Live There a While - Breitbart

Sir Roger Scruton’s Rejection of Communism and War for the West – CNSNews.com

Pictured is the late Sir Roger Scruton. (Photo credit: Andy Hall/Getty Images)

We meet by chanceand find in chance necessity:what seems an accidentin retrospect is fate.

These were the opening words of a poem that British philosopher Sir Roger Scruton wrote seven years ago to celebrate my marriage to Anna. We are among that fortunate group of people who knew the Aged Professor as a dear friend and mentorhis lifes true work, as he called it. Its a life that sadly ended earlier this monthat the age of 75.

Sir Roger was a warrior for Western culture. Culture was, for him, everything: a vessel in which intrinsic values are captured and handed on to future generations. He saw the slow and steady accumulation of traditions, teachings, and habits as the necessary ingredient for the good life and the just society, containing more truth and beauty than anything built by the most brilliant planners and intellectuals. Intellectuals of the left, he thought, were all too willing to discard the wisdom of the past for untriedor failedideologies, a risky endeavor because good things are easily destroyed, but not easily created.

Sir Roger gladly held a worldview he traced back to the great 18th-century English statesman Edmund Burke and beyond. Burke made his name opposing the ideological terror of the French Revolution. For Scruton, it was a near-French revolution in Paris in 1968 that caused his younger self to reject the radicalism of 20th century socialists and communists. He recounted to us many times how he marveled from the window of his mansard room in Paris at the mayhem the 68-ers caused, and at the global slaughters and starvations perpetrated by their fellow ideologues in power, which they ignored.

The cultural and intellectual elite never forgave his principled stand. After he started his career as a university professor in the 1970s, his peers shunned him, even despised him. They sought to drive him from the academy and polite society. In one of his final speeches, given before the Polish Parliament last year, he described his fellow academics as nice colleagues who taught him how nasty niceness can be.

He hardly fared better from his erstwhile allies in politics. The Conservative Party had a love-hate relationship with the United Kingdoms most famous conservative intellectual for the simple reason that he sought to conserve things.

He admired von Mises and Hayek and defended free markets (calling them a necessary part of any stable community) yet saw certain issues as beyond the markets bounds, from city planning to sexual morality. When he thought the Conservative Party undermined his countrys culture, he said so. Whether as a professor or in politics, Scruton was proof of the biblical adage, a prophet has no honor in his own country.

His rejection at home led him abroad. The 1970s and 80s saw him frequently travel behind the Iron Curtain in support of those who sought to reclaim their countries and cultures from Soviet domination. He taught at underground universities and wrote for samizdat publications, even smuggling in printing materials at great personal risk.

Sir Roger hated communism because it rejected the inherited wisdoms of the people it enslaved. He later opposed the post-modernist direction of the European Union on similar grounds. Like communist internationalism before it, the EUs progressive transnational project ran roughshod over distinct nations and cultures. He cheered the recent surge of national sentiment in Eastern Europe, while urging it to be grounded in something deeper and higher than mere national feeling. He supported a vibrant, sophisticated nationalism, instead of a reactionary, short-sighted one.

Whether it was politics, philosophy, or any other endeavor, Scruton excelled and elevated our minds by reminding us of our inheritance and celebrating the beauty of the natural world and the human capacity to create. He was the most brilliant and celebrated philosopher of aesthetics in modern times and authored dozens of books.

He wanted buildings that made us feel at home; art that inspired thinking of the sublime; and institutions that help all people flourish. His philosophical investigations and pursuit of the truth were always grounded in human experience. Sir Roger should be remembered as the patron saint of Common Sense.

Given his ideals, Scruton was often painted as a dark and dour man, wistfully mourning societys slide away from the tried and true. Those who met him knew otherwise.

My wife, Anna, and I first met him as students more than a decade ago. He was to us the great encourager in an age of alienation. We and many others felt at home with him whether it was in a Schloss in Vienna, a country house in Virginia, a downtown caf in Budapest, or the bright green fields of the Cotswolds.

Sir Rogers generosity of spirit will reverberate on in the thousands of lives he personally touched and in our great civilization that he conveyed into a new century.

Originally published inThe Federalist.

The rest is here:
Sir Roger Scruton's Rejection of Communism and War for the West - CNSNews.com

Reclaiming Jewish Life After the Nightmare of Communism – Tablet Magazine

As the calendar year 1989 began, Jews in what were then the Soviet satellite states (Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, East Germany, and Bulgaria) knew pretty much what they could look forward to: calls for world peace (the Soviet way), condemnations of imperialist America and its evil puppet Israel, along with slim pickings in the way of fresh fruit. By the time 1990 began, they were living in a very different world.

Ever since the one party state cemented control of these countries in 1948, rabbis had been run out of town, seminaries and Jewish schools had been closed, kosher food became all but impossible to obtain, and if you showed up for synagogue services (even without a fully ordained rabbi officiating), your future job prospects would dry up.

As if that wasnt bad enough, the official Jewish communities in every one of these countries seemed to exist solely to serve up a steady stream of anti-Israel propaganda, as prepared and precooked for them by the Central Committee of the Communist Party.

Little surprise that most Jews wanted little or nothing to do with the official Jewish organizations, although the communities usually allowed for Hanukkah and Purim parties, which were the two times in a year Jews felt safe getting together without fear of reprisal.

Then something happened. The political changes that began in June 1989, started as a brush fire, gathered strength, grew into an inferno that swept the region, and sent every central committee fleeing for the exit. By the time Hanukkah ended on Dec. 29, the Communists were looking at nothing but scorched earth, while everyone else wanted to start planting seedlings.

That meant Jews in these countries were ready to deal with the official community organs that had been spewing anti-Israel propaganda and preventing their children from studying Hebrewor learning even the first thing about Judaism. It didnt happen everywhere, all at once, but change was in the air.

Although no one loved the community leadership in Hungary, it did operate both a small Jewish school and a rabbinical seminary in Budapest that functioned during the Communist decades, and by 1989, the Lauder Foundation was about to open a new school while the Joint Distribution Committee opened its first office in Budapest since 1948. Further, by September 1989 Zionist youth clubs were given the green light to set up shop once again, Hebrew classes were being held in several locations every week, a half dozen synagogues drew congregants regularly and a Jewish summer camp functioned on Lake Balaton (the much larger camp at Szarvas would open in July 1990).

Romania had always been the odd man out. The dictator Nicolae Ceausescu was the only Warsaw Pact leader not to sever diplomatic ties with Israel in 1967, and the Jewish community operated choirs and a summer camp and Talmud Torah classes ran weekly in four cities. If any family asked for a bar mitzvah, Chief Rabbi David Moses Rosen made sure the child was prepared properly.

Poland was also an outlier. First, there were few Jews who were even registered in the 1980s, and to the communitys credit, at least it ran soup kitchens for elderly Holocaust survivors in Wroclaw and Warsaw along with a Yiddish theater in Warsaw. There was, however, little to nothing on offer for younger Jews. Much would happen in the coming years, as Jewish families came out of the woodwork and hundreds (some claim thousands) of younger Poles discovered genuine, or at least tenuous, Jewish roots.

But it was in Czechoslovakia and Bulgaria, two of the most hard-line states, where Jews launched their revolt during Hanukkah of 1989 and in January of 1990.

Dezider Galsky (born Goldfinger) had been a diplomat in the Czechoslovak foreign service, and a historian who had published several books on the Middle East. In 1980, he agreed to serve as president of Czechoslovakias Jewish Federation.

It was under his aegis that the Prague Jewish Museums blockbuster exhibition, The Precious Legacy, began its world tour. Galsky often went with it to speakalways diplomaticallybut it did him little good. The Communist Party had no idea that an exhibition of Czech Judaicanearly all of it gathered from Bohemian Jewish communities wiped out during the Holocaustwould garner such praise wherever it went, and that infuriated them. Galsky was accused of corruption, removed in 1985 and in his place came Frantisek Kraus, a man of such a complex background it beggars belief.

Born in the Czech Republic, Kraus and his family had been sent to Theresienstadt; I had once photographed him in front of the barracks where he was interned. He and his family were sent to Auschwitz where they perished and he survived. At wars end, Kraus left for Palestine, fought with the Haganah in Israels War of Independence, but decided to return home in the 1950s.

He was immediately imprisoned and, I was told, tortured by the authorities for being a Zionist spy and had even been threatened with a firing squad, but a general amnesty at the last minute freed him. Years later, Galsky gave him a job running the kosher kitchen in the Jewish community center, but when Galsky fell out of favor with the authorities, Kraus offered to take his place.

During his tenure at the Jewish Federation, Kraus forbade any programs that had to do with Israel, and when a group of younger community members asked him to at least consider allowing a Hebrew language course, he informed the secret police, who went and grilled everyone who had even asked him.

The one Jewish organization we did have, said Andrej Ernyei, a piano tuner and jazz musician, was our Jewish choir. Almost all of us were adults, and most of us had kids. Singing Hebrew songs together was the one thing we could do together as Jews, and Kraus didnt think we could do harm to anyone. But he was wrong. Were the one who pushed him out.

When Hanukkah came that December, and choir members were thrilled as the Communists were being hounded out of office, they demanded a communitywide meeting with Kraus. And with no one answering at party headquarters to help him out, Kraus gritted his teeth and prepared for the reckoning.

Hundreds of Jews crowded into the venerable hall on Meiselova Street and demanded he resign, and Dezider Galsky was asked to resume his old post. Kraus agreed, and not long after, Galsky asked Tomas Kraus (no relation), an executive at one of the countrys larger artists agencies, to become the general secretary.

Galsky knew hed need someone to help run things, as he was suddenly the name in everyones Rolodex. I just took Francois Mitterrand around the Jewish quarter, he told me in January 1990, Margaret Thatcher is coming and I cannot count the number of foreign ministers who have showed up, often with no warning at all.

Frantisek Kraus refused to apologize for anything he had done, but later came to Tomas Kraus and he practically begged me to allow him to be buried in the Jewish cemetery. He really did fear this would be the worst possible punishment. Of course I said yes, and he left the community. I never saw him again, although I was told he spent his last years as a security guard in a department store.

If Czechoslovakia was a hard-line Communist state, the countrys leadership was positively enlightened compared to Bulgarias aging Central Committee, headed by Tudor Zhivkov, who, by 1989, had ruled his country since 1954 and was now 78 years old.

With its economy in free fall in 1989, it wasnt hard for more moderate members of the Communist Party to force Zhivkov from power only one day after the Berlin Wall fell on Nov. 9. A few days after that, Bulgarian Jews gathered in the Jewish community center on Stambolijski Boulevard and had come with a suggestion for the Jewish community leadership headed by Iosif Astrukov. Namely: resign. Now.

Robert Djerassi described the scene. We didnt know how many would come but at least 150 people showed up, and although there was some tension and a lot of excitement, I remember saying that we needed to thank those who had run the community until now, but it was time for a new administration. Astrukov agreed to step down, and Eddy Schwartz, a publisher, theater director and novelist, was asked to take over.

By the time 1990 had begun, a new Jewish cultural organization had been launched: Shalom: the Organization of Jews in Bulgaria. And everyone would be welcomed.

Djerassi said that we inherited a five story building with almost nothing in it, other than a typewriter dating from 1880 and a secretary who managed the office. There was also a museum with a giant photograph of Czar Boris III shaking the hand of Adolf Hitler, which led into a museum of how Communists saved the Jews of Bulgaria.

Becca Lazarova, who would be the first director of the Lauder Jewish school in Sofia, said, We, the parents, knew almost nothing about being Jewish, and so at night we would teach ourselves, and then work alongside our children the next day in class.

Although Jewish organizations like JDC and ORT rushed in to help as Bulgarias economic collapse deepened, Schwartz never lost his sense of optimism. In September of 1990, when I asked him how Shalom was going to overcome its difficulties, he said, We have around 4,000 Jews in this country. Out of that we have 10 composers, 10 poets, 150 journalists, 12 theater directors, 200 full professors, six members of parliament with, of course, three on each side, 70 lawyers and nearly 100 doctors. So when it comes to tackling our problems, Id say we have the right people to do it.

The Jewish communities in Czechoslovakia and Bulgaria were the first to make serious changes during and after the fall of Communism in 1989, but they would not be the last. In 1991 the Soviet Union collapsed and communities in Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia started rebuilding Jewish life with an enthusiasm that belied their meager numbers. Then came Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, and Moldova.

Well over a million Jews would leave the Soviet Union as soon as they could, but that is a topic of another discussion, as is the story of how 150,000 opted to move to Germany, where they have given that community something it did have in the 1980s: a future.

The Central European Jewish communities, the ones wedged between Germany and what had been the Soviet Union, were all about to face a difficult road, a road they are still traveling three decades later. Except for the city of Budapest, where well more than 50,000 Jews live, no Jewish community in this region has a long-term future. The numbers, the critical mass, just isnt there.

But that is not the point. Starting 30 years ago, when 1990 began, the Jewish communities of Central and Eastern Europe started grabbing back a future that had been denied them for far too long. And they were throwing off the mantle of remnant like a garment that no longer fit. It is, after all, not a story about numbers. Its about the dignity of the effort.

***

Like this article? Sign up for our Daily Digest to get Tablet magazines new content in your inbox each morning.

Edward Serotta is a journalist, photographer and filmmaker specializing in Jewish life in Central and Eastern Europe.

Read more:
Reclaiming Jewish Life After the Nightmare of Communism - Tablet Magazine