Archive for the ‘Alt-right’ Category

Introducing the Winter/Spring 2020 edition of Brandeis Magazine – Brandeis University

Graphic/Mike Lovett

The cover of Brandeis Magazine.

Jan. 23, 2020

The Winter/Spring issue of Brandeis Magazine includes timely features, faculty and student news, Class Notes, notable alumni books, and much more.

Read about professor Dorothy Kims efforts to reclaim the Middle Ages from extremists who have perverted its history and iconography for political ends in Jousting with the Alt-Right.

Meet actor Robin Weigert 91, whose roles are as diverse as the unflappable Dr. Reisman in Big Little Lies and the indelicate Calamity Jane in Deadwood, in a probing profile, A Magical Vanishing Act.

Discover how the 2018 massacre at Pittsburghs Tree of Life synagogue brought together people of all faiths to help the citys Jewish community rebuild in Healing Roots.

In other news and stories, catch up on campus life; learn about groundbreaking faculty research and discover monumental murals by Brandeis artist Joe Wardwell. Reconnect with friends and classmates. Find out how the university is charting its future.

Visit link:
Introducing the Winter/Spring 2020 edition of Brandeis Magazine - Brandeis University

Tracks of the week reviewed: Soccer Mommy, BTS, Moby – The Guardian

Soccer Mommy Circle the Drain

Nashvilles new admiral of a genre no one whatsoever is calling slacker-feels manages that deft switcheroo of zhuzhing the achingly subjective into something universally, almost joyously sad. For a plaintive ditty about the downward drag of depression, and the pyrrhic exhaustion that rides pillion with trying to hide it from those around you, this is impossibly lovely, as any song that sounds exactly like High by Feeder is likely to be. Although, from Friday this will be Brexit Britain. Call yourself Football Mummy, please. Ta.

Having had quite enough of having to adopt male attributes in order to appear strong, Rina has concocted a sultry, whomp-bassed disco slammer, snatching the conch back from the patriarchy through the irresistible medium of glowstick. Even without its message, this is superbly polished pop. With it, Ill never pretend to like football again. Although, from Friday this will be Brexit Britain. Drop the French song titles, please. Ta.

You cannot fault the sheer see-what-sticks chutzpah of this baffling cut-and-shut Pollock of Auto-Tuned melody spasms, all barked over each other like some six-Jagers-deep closing-time row outside a Spoons, and marbled through with wild, erratic stabs of classical strings. Bizarre. And, somehow, brilliant.

Right: because they know its iffy, they are donating all royalties to charity. So I suppose this is fine, in the same way that lobbing chip fat down the khazi is fine because it keeps the people who carve up fatbergs in a job. But you still have to ask: in a tune railing against the alt-right, why would you use a sample of a Joan Jett cover of a Gary Glitter song? What are you doing, Green Day? Dont you think it will be weird if that Oh yeah! chanty bit takes off and a stadium full of kids all born after you stopped being good are raising their fists to Glitter? It will, wont it? Would it be less icky if the song were good, though? Oh no!

In an apparent week of musical mea culpas, vaguely problematic legume enthusiast Moby is also donating proceeds from this to charity. And its a perfectly actionable analogue banger, the likes of which Faithless havent slung since Val Kilmer was Batman, with Dead Kennedys DH Peligro howling about injustice where Maxi Jazz would usually be saying something filthy about tights. But its Moby. And hes a prat, isnt he?

Read more:
Tracks of the week reviewed: Soccer Mommy, BTS, Moby - The Guardian

A new religious right think tank thinks Jesus’ teachings are too liberal – LGBTQ Nation

Holy CrusadePhoto: jorisvo / Shutterstock.com

Sometimes you have to destroy Christianity to save it.

That seems to be the premise behind the new think tank at Liberty University. The think tank, called the Falkirk Center, explicitly rejects Jesus teaching on the grounds that he was, well, a wimp. Instead, the Falkirk Center promises bold, unapologetic action and initiative so that it can reach its goal of restoring and defending American ideals and Judeo-Christian values in all aspects of life.

Related: Kanye West joins stadium prayer rally with some of Americas most anti-LGBTQ activists

Bemoaning the rise of leftism is no longer enough, and turning the other cheek in our personal relationships with our neighbors as Jesus taught while abdicating our responsibilities on the cultural battlefield is no longer sufficient, the Falkirks mission statement posits.There is too much at stake in the battle for the soul of our nation.

Just to highlight that the organization is engaged in a holy war, the Center begins its description by referring to the movie Braveheart, about the Scottish freedom fighters who were defeated in battle but eventually victorious in the long term. The website even includes an image of the fighters engaged in battle. (Braveheart was directed by Mel Gibson, who isnt exactly a LGBTQ supporter and who included a scene of anti-gay violence in the movie.)

Apparently, modesty is another disposable Christian trait. The Center is named after its founders: Jerry Falwell Jr., the head of Liberty University, and Charlie Kirk, head of the right-wing student group Turning Point USA.

Falwell is notorious for his attacks on LGBTQ people, as well as his own inexplicable financial ties to a pool boy and personal trainer.He has turned Liberty University into his own anti-LGBTQ fiefdom. Charlie Kirk, now 26 years old, purports to be the voice of young conservatives, having founded TPUSA when he was just 18. The organization is lavishly funded by wealthy Republican donors and foundations.

Kirk has said that the conservative movement should be open to gay people, but at the same time opposes marriage equality and has described opposition to religious liberty exemptions as fascism. This modified homophobia is designed to appeal to young peoples overwhelming disdain for anti-LGBTQ rhetoric, but it has backfired on Kirk. He has been trolled by alt-right types who are much more willing to be in-your-face about their hatred of LGBTQ people. How does anal sex help us win the culture wars? one questioner asked him at an event last year. (On the positive side for the alt-right crew: TPUSA has a history of racist hires.)

Just what the Falwell-Kirk duo purport to do to achieve their goalsother than raise moneyis unclear. The Falkirk Center website consists of a single page. But what is clear is that for the religious right, the culture war is a battle to the death. Just how metaphorical that is, remains an open and disturbing question.

Continued here:
A new religious right think tank thinks Jesus' teachings are too liberal - LGBTQ Nation

Is it permitted to punch a Nazi? Consult the internet Talmud. – The Jewish News of Northern California

In the midst of President Donald Trumps inauguration three years ago, well-groomed white supremacist spokesman and coiner of the term alt-right Richard Spencer was standing on a street corner explaining to a skeptical detractor that he is not a Nazi when an anonymous hero ran up and punched Spencer in the face.

Video of the incident went viral after it was shared on Twitter, and a still-ongoing debate between delighted leftists and scandalized centrists was born: Is it OK to punch a Nazi in the face? Naturally, the Jews got in on it, and things got positively Talmudic.

Earlier this month, the debate continued in the well-appointed conference room of a downtown San Francisco law firm during a lunchtime study session organized by Rabbi Dan Ain of Congregation Beth Sholom.

Ain brought to the Jan. 8 session copies of a study sheet titled Is One Permitted to Punch a White Supremacist in the Face? This collection of texts can be found on Sefaria, a free, user-friendly online compendium of any Jewish text you could want: Torah, Talmud, liturgy, Kabbalah and so on.

Click on a verse or passage and a sidebar appears, providing links to relevant classical commentaries, midrash, philosophical texts and more. Im not exaggerating when I say it is the most important Jewish resource on the internet.

Sefaria also provides a truly transformational tool: the ability to build and share source sheets. Users can build a clickable, printable collection of pieces of any text on Sefaria and add their own commentary. These sheets have become ubiquitous in Jewish study sessions; you may have already used one without knowing it. The source sheets can be made public so that anyone may look at them on Sefaria and add more texts.

Like the Talmud, the source sheet is a living, breathing document, with people adding and finding new sources as they go, Ain told the seven attendees.

The sheet on which Ain based the session was created three years ago by Rabbi Josh Bolton (currently at Hillel at Brown University and Rhode Island School of Design), but people have continued adding relevant texts since then.

It begins with an excerpt from a 2005 post on jewschool.com, which recounts the story of an Orthodox rabbi who threw a cup of coffee at and then punched a belligerent anti-Semite who confronted him in an airport. Its never okay to throw the first punch unless yer schoolin a Nazi scumf*ck. Amen, the post concluded.

Our little gathering immediately got to dissecting the incident. Some held that the punch was unjustified, while others (myself included) felt that the Nazi scumf*ck had been asking for it by initiating the verbally aggressive encounter.

Asked the lawyer whose firm we met at: What does it accomplish?

To which I replied: It reinforces that there are consequences to bringing the Nazi scumf*cks hate into the public sphere.

Ains wife, writer Alana Joblin Ain, offered: It can boost morale. Maybe an individual act of resistance doesnt matter on its own, but it creates an atmosphere that leads to more action.

Said another attendee who had seemed on the fence at the beginning of the session, It wasnt out of the blue. It came after an exchange of hateful words. So I think its OK.

Asked another person: What was gained? Me: What was lost?

While one attendee was avidly anti-punch, most in the room were conflicted. I was the only person unequivocally on the side of punching Nazis.

As we talked, a record of the still-ongoing online discussion played out on the printout in front of us: Bolton discussing the texts with the Jews of the internet who were freely adding texts to his sheet.

A rabbi contributed a passage from Pirkei Avot 4:1: Who is the mighty one? He who overpowers his inclination slowness to anger is better than a mighty person.

When queried by Bolton, the rabbi explains: I think this text represents the stance of What I WANT to do is sock this guy in the face. But what Im GOING to do is respond nonviolently, protest, and elect officials that see to it that scumbags like him never become a legitimate threat.

An elderly Russian at the study session mentioned the example of Esther: She solved the problem peacefully, convinced the king to stop Haman. But that ended in the murder of Haman, Ain pointed out. She shrugged.

Then she said, What if Russia didnt stand up [during World War II]? Like Eastern Europe, we wouldnt have had peace.

But a Jew in the throes of text study can hold multiple opinions.

The woman then told the story of a Jewish boss she had at a Soviet-era factory. He once refused to shake the hand of an anti-Semitic Communist official. We never saw him again, she said. Was it worth it? Ain asked. No, she said. He didnt do any good for himself or anyone.

You cant make peace with someone who wants to kill you.

Throughout the session, Ain remained conflicted, acknowledging that true violence cant be countered by sitting on our hands but he also said, We are Beth Sholom beit shalom, a house of peace. How do we set the example of making peace? Is it impossible to dialog with these people?

To which I responded, You cant make peace with someone who wants to kill you. Consider the rodef law. Rodef means pursuer; in Jewish law, if someone is coming after you with the intention of killing you, you are required to attempt to kill them first.

As in so many Jewish debates, there was no resolution to be had, though I remained resolute in my convictions. Ain and I have continued the conversation in recent days over email and in person.

Beyond the subject matter, I was struck by the technology that facilitated it. Once upon a time, the Talmud was a real-life discussion. Then it was written down. Its distinctive style was standardized after the invention of the printing press, and a codified set of commentators was added to the margins of the pages.

Now, with tools like Sefaria, were dealing once again with a living Talmud.

Whether you agree or disagree with me about punching Nazis, you have to admit that Sefaria, with its unprecedented ease of access to Jewish text study and new tools for collaborative commentary, is good for the Jews.

Read this article:
Is it permitted to punch a Nazi? Consult the internet Talmud. - The Jewish News of Northern California

Things to Do in Miami: "Radicals and Reactionaries" at Wolfsonian-FIU January 30-May 30, 2020 – Miami New Times

It's 2020. Income inequality is rampant; anti-Semitism is on the rise; and a presidential candidate advocating social-democratic policies is at the top of the polls.

It's 1932.Income inequality is rampant; anti-Semitism is on the rise; and a presidential candidate advocating social-democratic policies is at the top of the polls.

It's difficult to ignore the parallels between today's America and that of the 1930s, especially in terms of radical politics. As the working class struggled to survive during the Great Depression, American leftists sought to fight back against the wealthy, while the capitalists, including men such as Henry Ford and newspaper magnate William Randolph Hearst, courted fascism in order to maintain social control.

As Florida International University history professor Frank Luca and his America and Movies students found, today's battles between Republicans (and the so-called alt-right) and leftist politicians (and groups such as the DSA and Antifa) are not all that dissimilar from those in the '30s. But Luca and his students also found that each side had something in common back then: They used art to spread their messages.

"I think that's what the students were most interested in," Luca says. "They saw so many parallels from especially the 1930sbut also the little bit into the '40s and '50sof some of the same sort of controversies that are happening today between socialists on the left and the neo-Nazis, in this case, on the right."

Luca and his students' findings are the subject of the latest exhibit at the Wolfsonian-FIU: "Radicals and Reactionaries: Extremism in America," which is set to open Thursday, January 31, and run through the end of May. The class worked to curate a collection of book covers, posters, political cartoons, and other imagery from the era to explore its closeness with the present. Luca hopes that by analyzing these politically charged pictures, viewers will be able to make more educated decisions in our own image-saturated world.

This cover of a book published by the American League Against War and Fascism shows a caricature of the publishing magnate William Randolph Hearst. He was a known Nazi sympathizer.

Wolfsonian-FIU

"One of the things we always try to do here is to show people the artwork to also make them more aware of how they're being manipulated through the use of imagery," he says. "So if we can create more sophisticated consumers of that visual information, then perhaps people will be less manipulated in the present."

Though the students tried to balance the exhibition, ultimately they found more leftist material from which to choose. Luca says that's simply because artists as a group tend to lean left politically.

"Sometimes, when we were looking for coverage of a specific issue, we would find more radical left critique of the right for that issue than actual right-wing artistic propaganda," he says. "So it became a bit of a challenge to try to keep it balanced."

Though many leftist artists worked within institutions and went uncredited, some had name recognition. Artists presented in "Radicals and Reactionaries" include Lynd Ward, a pioneering illustrator and woodcut engraver who introduced the graphic novel to the United States in the form of his "wordless novel" God's Man. Ward also designed the cover for 10 Days That Shook the World, journalist John Reed's famous account of the Russian Revolution. Hugo Gellert, meanwhile, juggled staff artist jobs at theNew YorkerandNew York Timeswith work for the Communist Party USA, of which he was a committed member.

"His work tends to be lots of big, brawny men symbolizing the worker, and caricatures of any one of the sort of capitalist class almost looking like Mr. Moneybags from the Monopoly game," Luca says.

An unknown artist created this cover for a book about the Ku Klux Klan. Many of the artists who worked for far-right groups did so anonymously.

Wolfsonian-FIU

On the other side, many of the artists who produced work for right-wing groups did so anonymously, although that doesn't mean the works are inferior in quality. One piece on display is a cover for a book about the Ku Klux Klan depicting a white-hooded horseman framed by a leafy art nouveaustyle motif.

"It's presenting them as chivalric knights in armor. Defending white civilization and culture is the whole message, and it's very romanticized,"Luca says. "And so that's really the kind of thing that's more typical on the right."

Looking at this image, you might view the horseman as a heroic knight, or you might see the vines and imagine the Klan as a noxious weed infesting the nation. Or you might simply appreciate the aesthetics. What's important is knowing what the images mean and how they're meant to influence you.

"I'm not one of those people who would say there are good people on both sides," Luca says. "What we're really doing here is not entering the political fray, but showing how artists actually were willingly used [and] joined in the fray to fight for one cause or the other."

"Radicals and Reactionaries: Extremism in America." Thursday, January 30, through Sunday, May 31, at the Wolfsonian-FIU, 1001 Washington Ave., Miami Beach; wolfsonian.org.Admission is $12 for adults; $8 for students, seniors, and children aged 6 to 18; and free for members, children under 6, and students, faculty, and staff of the State University System of Florida.

Douglas Markowitz was Miami New Times' music and arts editorial intern for summer 2017. Born and raised in South Florida, he studied at Sophia University in Tokyo before finishing a bachelor's in communications from University of North Florida. He currently writes freelance about music, art, film, and other subjects.

Follow this link:
Things to Do in Miami: "Radicals and Reactionaries" at Wolfsonian-FIU January 30-May 30, 2020 - Miami New Times