Archive for the ‘Afghanistan’ Category

Peace in Afghanistan is possible – Pajhwok Afghan News (subscription) (blog)

Today the European Union will mark 60 years since the signature of the Rome Treaties. Since then the citizens of our Member States have enjoyed six decades of unprecedented peace, prosperity and security. The contrast to the first half of the 20th Century could not be greater. Two catastrophic wars in Europe between 1914 and 1945 left millions dead, and a continent devastated, divided and prostrate. European integration has been the most successful peace project in our history.

The European Union has been engaged in Afghanistan for decades and the European Union and its Member States are the largest donors in Afghanistan. Coming out of the very successful Brussels Conference on Afghanistan in October 2016 we will continue to be so until 2020.

Over the last 60 years Europe has proved that there is an alternative to war. This is also the case here in Afghanistan. Looking into the history of Europe there are many examples of old enemies coming together and agreeing on peace and reconciliation. The same can happen in Afghanistan and we must all work towards achieving peace here. It is our hopes that the European project can serve as inspiration for all Afghans. The EU will make peace the number one goal for our work in the coming years

The world is going through a time of great uncertainty: the global balance of power is shifting and the foundations of a rules-based international order are too often being questioned. The European Union will be an increasingly vital power to preserve and strengthen the global order. The European Union is and will continue to be a strong, cooperative and reliable power. Our partners know what we stand for.

Whatever events may bring in the future, one thing is certain: the EU will continue to put promoting international peace and security, development cooperation, human rights and responding to humanitarian crises at the heart of its foreign and security policies. The EU will remain a strong and committed supporter of the Afghan people. Let's all make peace in Afghanistan our joint priority. Peace is possible.

View expressed in this article are of the authors own and do not necessarily reflect Pajhwoks editorial policy.

More:
Peace in Afghanistan is possible - Pajhwok Afghan News (subscription) (blog)

America Can’t Terror-Proof Afghanistan – The National Interest Online

It is a truth universally acknowledged that a conflict in possession of no military solution must be in want of more troops. Or so one would think from the recommendations on how to succeed in Afghanistan made by Gen. John Nicholson, the force commander in Afghanistan; Gen. Joseph Votel, commander of Central Command; and Republican senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham. More troops with greater authorities will break or end the stalemate that all agree exists. Greater authorities means putting U.S. troops back in direct combat with the Taliban and authorizing them to risk killing more Afghan civilians.

More troops may shift the terms of the stalemate slightly and make it last longer, though it will probably last as long as the United States wants to pay for it. With or without more troops, under the present strategy, the U.S. commitment would have to be eternal, because it does nothing to mitigate the geopolitical conditions that created an enabling environment for global terrorism in the Afghanistan-Pakistan border region and which can be addressed only by political means. Terrorism is not caused by the existence of terrorists, and killing terrorists does not eradicate terrorism. The United States may define counterterrorism as its core interest in the region, but both those we label terrorists and those fighting them have political objectives rooted in the history of their societies. The Taliban were a product of the decades-long collapse of the Afghan state under the pressure of Cold War and regional rivalries. Al Qaeda, a product of the Arab world, developed in the ungoverned space created by war and support for, first, Afghan mujahidin fighting the Soviet Union and then the Taliban. The Islamic State, a product of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, has gained a foothold in Afghanistan by exploiting these same conditions.

Afghanistan has not been able to recover from the collapse of its state triggered by the 1979 Soviet-Afghan war, because the conflicts and shaky governments that followed could not address the core problem: Afghanistan is a landlocked state whose economy, ranked 172 out of 184 countries in gross domestic product per capita by the International Monetary Fund, cannot pay the cost of governing or defending a population scattered in enclaves separated by deserts and mountains. Since its demarcation in its current borders by the British and Russian empires at the end of the nineteenth century, the Afghan state has needed foreign subsidies to survive, and foreign subsidiesand troop deploymentsextend the reach of the power that provides them, regardless of its stated objectives.

When a foreign power, whether British Empire, the Soviet Union, or the United States, supports a state and its army, its enemies and rivals may feel threatened. Afghanistan was stable, first, when the British and Russian empires agreed that the British would subsidize a strong centralized state; that this state would submit to British control of its foreign relations; and that the two great powers would not use Afghanistan to challenge each others spheres of influence in Persia (Iran), Bukhara (Central Asia) and India. During the first half of the Cold War, the United States and USSR, despite their global antagonism, worked out a modus vivendi in Afghanistan, under which each supported different sectors of the state and worked in different areas of the country. It was not difficult to maintain this agreement as long as the stakes in Afghanistan were relatively small.

That Afghanistan is landlocked has two additional consequences. First, support for Afghanistan by an offshore power like the United States requires the cooperation of neighbors with direct access to international waters or airspace, in this case Pakistan, Iran or Russia, which controls offshore access to Central Asia. Second, growth of Afghanistans economy requires cooperation with those and other neighbors for access to international investments and markets.

Given current U.S. relations with Iran and Russia, U.S. access to Afghanistan depends on the cooperation of Pakistan. That dependence is no less real for being problematic: Pakistan provides a safe haven for the Afghan Taliban leadership to pressure the United States and the Afghan government over the Indian presence in Afghanistan and Afghan claims on Pakistani territory. Many U.S. and Afghan analysts argue that pressure on Pakistan to abandon the Afghan Taliban is the solution to the Afghan conflict. As long as U.S. forces and personnel are in Afghanistan, however, U.S. logistical dependence on Pakistan places limits on how much Washington, DC can pressure Islamabad, Measures like sanctions, designation as a state sponsor of terror, cross-border attacks, or cancellation of bilateral assistance could lead Islamabad to cut U.S. supply lines. As long as U.S. relations with Russia and Iran preclude transit through those countries, the United States is stuck with Pakistan.

When Pakistan closed the military supply lines after a series of incidents in 2011, the United States supplied its forces in Afghanistan through Russia and Central Asia. It cannot do so now, and transit through Iran remains impossible. Pakistan is also better situated to resist U.S. unilateral pressure than before. As a result of Chinese construction of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) linking Chinas western Xinjiang province to the Pakistani port of Gwadar on the Arabian Sea, Pakistan and China are closer than ever. China does not support Pakistans policy of sheltering the Taliban and would like to help the United States stabilize Afghanistan, but not through a confrontation with Pakistan. Russia and Iran have also grown closer to Pakistan as Indian prime minister Narendra Modi has strengthened ties with the United States.

See the article here:
America Can't Terror-Proof Afghanistan - The National Interest Online

Strategic District in Southern Afghanistan, Sangin, Falls to Taliban – New York Times


New York Times
Strategic District in Southern Afghanistan, Sangin, Falls to Taliban
New York Times
KANDAHAR, Afghanistan The Taliban captured the strategic district of Sangin in the southern province of Helmand on Thursday, the culmination of a yearslong offensive that took the lives of more combatants than any other fight for territory in ...
Is it safe for Britain to send refugees back to Afghanistan?The Guardian
Taliban Retake Key District in AfghanistanVoice of America
Taliban overtakes Sangin district in Helmand province, AfghanistanUPI.com
NEWS.com.au -Anadolu Agency -The Peninsula Qatar
all 25 news articles »

See the article here:
Strategic District in Southern Afghanistan, Sangin, Falls to Taliban - New York Times

American dream coming true for military translator from Afghanistan – KSDK.com

The American dream is coming true for a young Afghan man and his family. But, it came with a high price.

Anne Allred, KSDK 10:26 PM. CDT March 22, 2017

HaseebAhmadi

The American dream is coming true for a 26-year-old Afghan man and his family.

Haseeb Ahmadi, his wife and 18-month-old daughter landed at Lambert Airport to begin a new life in the United States.

Ahmadi worked as a translator helping some local U.S. Marines communicate with the Afghan Army they were aiding in Afghanistan in 2014. It was a job that put Ahmadi on the Talibans hit list.

The minute you start working with U.S. forces, the Taliban will put a hit out on you in the tribe where you came from, said retired Gunnery Sgt., Hugh Tychsen.

Everybody knows you, so you cant ever go back to that tribe, continued Tychsen.

Tychsen, a Ladue resident, saidAhmadi was invaluable during the operation.

He can read the body language in the room in Afghanistan and if something is about to happen, hell let you know, Tychsen said.

When the Marines pulled out of Helmand Province in 2014, Ahmadi was forced into hiding for the next three years to avoid the Taliban.

During that same three years, Tychsen was working to sponsor Ahmadi for a U.S. Visa so he could come to St. Louis permanently.

I feel like we owe it to him to make sure hes safe. Hes the kind of guy you can trust your life with, he said. In mid-March, Ahmadi officially began calling St. Louis his new home.

I feel like I left my family there but now I have a new family. I am very happy here, said Ahmadi.

The International Institute of Saint Louis is providing Ahmadi with an apartment. In 30 to 60 days he will have a Social Security card and will be able to start applying for jobs.Ahmadi says his goals are simple. He wants to save a little money, buy a car and maybe one day, a home.

He doesnt want to come here and get a free meal," Tychsen said. "He wants to work hard, he just wants freedom and safety for his kids and his family.

2017 KSDK-TV

Continue reading here:
American dream coming true for military translator from Afghanistan - KSDK.com

Green Berets who liberated Afghanistan from the Taliban tell their stories in new documentary – ArmyTimes.com

In the days following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, the Defense Department sent two teams of Army Special Forces soldiers to Afghanistan to bring down the Taliban.

But the two didn't know about each other, and though each team's story became a book, they've been brought together for the first time in "Legion of Brothers," a documentaryproduced by CNN Films along with journalist Peter Bergen and documentarian Tresha Mabile.

"All these years, weve become so compartmented because the wars continued. We didnt know each others stories," retired Master Sgt. Scott Neil said Wednesday evening at a screening of the film in Washington, D.C. "I was amazed every time I would hear another teams stories about the things they did."

Using personal photos and video from the deployment, blended with group and individual interviews of the former members of 3rd Battalion, 5th Special Forces Group and their wives, director Greg Barker brought together the stories of Operational Detachment Alpha 574 and ODA 595.

Production began back in 2015 and, the retired Green Berets said, the opportunity to participate came just at the right time.

"Our entire team was nearing retirement, and we knew they were going to complete their time on active service," said retired Maj. Mark Nutsch, team leader of ODA 595 in the fall of 2001.

"For the American people to understand, kind of, how we went out on our mission that was extended for weeks and months," he said, adding that they did it all without body armor or tactical vehicles, living with Afghan partners and following an Afghan plan.

Nutsch's team, who became known as the " horse soldiers" because of their old-school transportation, was in charge of leading the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan to unite against Taliban rule.

Green Berets from 5th Special Forces Group were among the first to deploy to Afghanistan after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Some of them rode into battle on horseback alongside fighters from the Northern Alliance. Photo Credit: Army Meanwhile, in the south, retired Lt. Col. Jason Amerine led ODA 574, which was tasked with guarding future Afghan president Hamid Karzai as he coordinated his Pashtun allies to bring down the Taliban in their Kandahar stronghold.

The campaign was considered a stunning victory a couple dozen guys in their early 30s taking down a brutal regime with a tragic end.

On the morning before the Taliban surrendered, an Air Force bomber accidentally dropped a joint direct attack munition on ODA 574's position outside the city.

"Everyone I've ever led in combat has been killed or wounded," Amerine said in the film.

Master Sgt. J.D. Davis was killed immediately in the blast, while Sgt. 1st Class Daniel Petithory died of his injuries later that day.

An investigation later found that the Air Force joint tactical air controller attached to the unit had accidentally calibrated his equipment with his own coordinates rather than those of the target ordered by battalion commander Lt. Col. David Fox.

"What makes it so personal, and really kind of sinks its claws in me, is that we had two friendly fires within a week of each other caused by headquarters bombing themselves, that never should have been calling in airstrikes," Amerine told Army Times.

Hamid Karzai, center, who would go on to be the president of Afghanistan, stands with members of 5th Special Forces Group's Operational Detachment Alpha 572 during the early days of the war. Photo Credit: Army The Green Berets theorized in the documentary that Fox wanted to bomb a suspicious looking cave that day, hours before the Taliban were due to surrender, to score himself points as a battlefield commander. "It's something that I'll take to my grave with me," Fox said in the documentary.

Lessons, not learned

"I think we did make it look too easy," Amerine said in the film.

Asked after the screening what went wrong in the ensuing 14 years of combat deployments to Afghanistan, the retired officer said there was a failure to debrief.

"Fifth Group never captured the lessons learned. We never did the, 'What should we sustain? What should we improve?'" he said. "What was amazing was the organization worked, the training worked, the organizational culture worked."

But once they got home, the team was quickly spun up again to help with the Iraq invasion while "big Army" sent brigades into Afghanistan.

The plan was to "cordon off Baghdad and train up some guerrilla forces to take Baghdad in a couple months," Amerine added. "There were insane things that, to me, showed that people really didnt get what went on in Afghanistan."

The reason it worked early on, the men said, was because they worked with Afghan leaders and, essentially, helped them execute their own home-grown plan.

"All of that was forgotten and kind of left behind, and that was kind of the tragedy of what followed," Amerine said. "When big Army came in, 5thGroup picked up and went to Iraq. All of our relationships were lost. They had to reinvent the wheel."

Now, the Army is reaching back to those legendary ODAs for their wisdom. A year and a half ago, Nutsch and retired Chief Warrant Officer 4 Bob Pennington, an ODA 574 veteran, visited 5th Group to talk about the current conflicts in Iraq and Syria.

"The teams now are a lot younger than we were at that time ... but that doesnt take away from how good those guys are on the battlefield and what they can do, especially when they work with the indigenous forces and apply all the knowledge that theyve learned in all the schools that we actually produce," Pennington said.

Army special operators confer with Afghan chieftains and resistance fighters during the early days of the war in Afghanistan. Beginning Oct. 19, 2001, 12-man Special Forces detachments from 5th Special Forces Group began arriving in Afghanistan in the middle of the night. Photo Credit: Army The men were once again reminded of the operation late last year, when retired Marine Gen. Jim Mattis was nominated by President Donald Trump to be the defense secretary.

When the JDAM hit ODA 574 on the morning of Dec. 5, 2001, the closest medevac support was 45 minutes away at Camp Rhino, a forward operating base in Afghanistan, where then-Brig. Gen. Mattis was in charge of more than 1,000 Marines.

Mattis, according to reports, declined to send help because, at the time, no one knew that it was a friendly bomb and he opted not to risk his men in the midst of what could have been an enemy attack.

The story of the attack and the aftermath is recounted extensively in the book " The Only Thing Worth Dying For," by Eric Blehm, which was published in 2011.

In the meantime, Petithory succumbed to his injuries before an Air Force medevac arrived hours after the attack. That decision still doesn't sit well with Amerine.

"Everyone involved in both sets of decision making, basically, was selected for promotion," he said. "The guys that killed my men became generals."

"A lot of careers, in my opinion, should have ended over a lot of the things that went on in 01," he said. "It felt to me like in 01, we really didnt want to acknowledge heroism, and we didnt want to acknowledge the cowards. The awards we put in for our guys for valor were all downgraded."

Others came to Mattis' defense, citing the chaos and short-order planning at the time.

"Commanders, Im sure, would like a do-over. No doubt," Nutsch said. "I hope these other commanders have learned their lesson, and I hope some of these mistakes arent repeated again."

"Legion of Brothers" is set for a limited release over Memorial Day weekend. It will air on CNN this fall, Barker added, before going to Hulu.

Link:
Green Berets who liberated Afghanistan from the Taliban tell their stories in new documentary - ArmyTimes.com