Mediaboss Marketing

The generals asked President Trump for a surge of 5,000 troops for Afghanistan, Americas 16-year-long lost war. But the buck doesnt stop at the Trump White House. Trump told the generals, "You decide." The White House gave the go-ahead for another surge.

"Only" 5,000 troops, supposedly to help the peace process. Kill and bomb more people to encourage people to negotiate for peace. Do you believe it?

We Americans are persistent. But when it comes to wars, we exhibit perseveration, defined as the inappropriate persistence or repetition of a thought or action.

Repetition of thoughts. Example: War is the answer to all diplomatic problems. Repetition of actions. Example: We accept lie after lie from our presidents, pushing us into wars.

In Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria, tens of thousands of Americans have died, along with millions of Asian and Middle Eastern people. One lying president after another tells us the sky is falling. Its the commies, the horrible dictators, the treacherous religious terrorists.

By late 1967, when the surge of American troops was really building in Vietnam, President Lyndon Johnson knew the war was a loser, as did Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, but both continued to lie and lie. And people continued to die and die.

These politicians arent really interested in communists or terrorists. Politicians want the oil, gas, copper, tin, titanium, or markets for their 1 percenter corporate friends. They know war is good for their political careers. And they will be rewarded by a grateful military-industrial complex. Walmart, GM and so many others do hundreds of billions worth of business with the commies in China and Vietnam without a blink of the eye.

The oil-soaked Middle East dictatorships like Saudi Arabia and Qatar fund the schooling, training and operations of religious terrorists, yet these dictators are our buddies buying billions in American weapons systems. Simultaneously, we send our youth to fight the religious terrorists that our CIA with President Jimmy Carters approval started funding, training and equipping in Afghanistan (Mujahideen and Osama bin Laden). We and the Saudis created and funded religious terrorists to fight the Russians there in 1979 and since 2001 our soldiers have been trying to defeat them for 16 years. And our military-industrial complex makes money providing weapons to both sides.

We have bled our soldiers and other peoples of their blood. We have bled our nation of trillions of dollars that should have been spent building a better life for all Americans. War profiteers, CEOs and share owners make hundreds of billions while the under-funded Veterans Affairs hospitals try to take care of all our physically, mentally and morally crushed soldiers. And military families pay the highest price of all: dead and damaged loved ones.

These are illegal wars of aggression illegal. Our Constitution requires the Congress to declare war on a nation. That has not been done for any of the wars since 2001. The United Nations Charter permits a nation to respond to an attack by another nation. The USA has not been attacked by any nation. 9/11 was a criminal gang attack not an attack upon us by Afghanistan. Under treaties signed by the USA, illegal war is the greatest crime, because all other crimes will then be committed: murder, torture, rape, starvation, theft, religious, political or sexual persecution, genocide, repression. Everything imaginable takes place during war.

Today, after 16 years of destroying Afghanistan, we need to get out, not send more troops!

We must admit that in the current wars, we are on the side of the gangsters, drug kings, murderous militias, dictators, torturers and power-hungry religious fanatics.

What weve done in these countries has not worked. Our wars and weapons have pushed these countries from bad to worse. Millions are homeless and refugees. Their hatred will last decades or centuries.

We need to admit our failures to the United Nations and ask the UN to conduct peace negotiations in each nation. We must support those negotiations, pay the costs, withdraw all our troops and military equipment, stop the bombings and drone attacks, and stop the surveillance and training assistance.

Citizens, we must support the rule of law rather than the rule of empire or whim. We must not accept more lying and corruption.

We must impeach those presidents and generals who have led these illegal wars, and make them examples of what America will do when elected leaders and generals forsake their oaths to preserve and defend the Constitution of the United States of America and when they betray the American people.

We must stop creating wars, and stop supplying weapons to all sides. We must request the UN take leadership in trying to peacefully resolve the quagmire we have helped create.

Buzz Davis, formerly of Stoughton now of Tucson, was trained as an infantry officer during the Vietnam War and served in South Korea. Hes a longtime progressive activist, a member of Veterans for Peace, a former VISTA volunteer, elected official, union organizer, impeachment organizer, a former VP of WI Alliance for Retired Americans and a retired state government planner. dbuzzdavis@aol.com

Share your opinion on this topic by sending a letter to the editor to tctvoice@madison.com. Include your full name, hometown and phone number. Your name and town will be published. The phone number is for verification purposes only. Please keep your letter to 250 words or less.

Go here to read the rest:
Buzz Davis: Admit defeat in Afghanistan and engage the United Nations - Madison.com

Sen. John McCain said Wednesday he is working on an amendment that would add an Afghanistan strategy to the annual defense policy bill, after complaining that the Trump administration has yet to develop any new approaches to America's longest running conflict.

The Arizona Republican has criticized the administration for weeks over its lack of a new strategy and threatened to force one on the Pentagon. He said he will now propose a strategy created by his Armed Services Committee as part of the National Defense Authorization Act, which is now awaiting a floor vote.

"I told them months ago, unless you give us a strategy, we'll give you a strategy," McCain said.

Defense Secretary Jim Mattis admitted the U.S. is not winning in Afghanistan during testimony in June, and promised McCain and the committee a new strategy was coming by mid-July.

When asked about troop numbers in Afghanistan Tuesday, Mattis said, "I'm still putting together my ideas on that." Mattis has said he is working to put together a more regional strategy and is consulting with the president.

President Trump has delegated more authority to Mattis to decide how many additional troops should be added to the 8,400 currently deployed to Afghanistan.

The administration is reportedly considering an increase of 3,000 to 5,000 troops, though Mattis has declined to confirm any range of new deployments.

Read the original here:
John McCain pushing to include Afghanistan strategy in defense bill - Washington Examiner

Updated July 12, 2017 15:50:30

The photographs, the documents, the whistleblower testimony are all there the brutal details of our diggers' conduct brought forward into the harsh light of day.

A blow has been dealt to the prestige of Australia's special forces with in-kind damages likely to follow for the reputation of the Australian Army as a whole.

At first, it might seem tempting to think of these kinds of events as isolated incidents that do not speak to a more widespread problem within the Army's special operations community. But misconduct on the battlefield also speaks to a wayward shift in a military force's broader operating culture.

Along with the Maywand District murders and the Panjywai massacre, what these new allegations levelled against Australian soldiers in Uruzgan will come to symbolise is the ultimate failure of Western militaries to adapt to a fight where the decisive battle was the human terrain.

According to our military leaders, the reason for Australia's presence in Uruzgan province between 2001 and 2014 was to "clear, hold and build" a Taliban-free Afghanistan. Per counterinsurgency doctrine, by providing an enduring sense of physical security to local Afghans, the "hearts and minds" as well as the rifles and trigger-fingers of fighting-aged males in Uruzgan would eventually be won over.

At some point it seems that this strategic guidance either failed or was wholly ignored.

While Special Operations soldiers had earlier played a kind of "guardian angel" role in support of their regular counterparts in the Mentoring and Reconstruction Task Force, as the Afghan war dragged on, that role became increasingly aggressive.

An upsurge in "direct action" operations began to distract from efforts to secure the population. By 2010, much of the task group was solely focused on so-called "high-value targeting" the coalition's effort to kill or capture an ever-growing list of local Taliban "commanders".

As a former Special Operations Task Group member drily put it to me, the new penchant for fly-in fly-out missions conducted out the side of a Black Hawk saw the entire concept of operations switch from "clear, hold and build" to "land, kill and leave".

Of course, operating in this manner was never going to defeat the Taliban. Insurgencies are complex adaptive systems capable of surviving the deaths of leaders. As David Kilcullen writes in Counterinsurgency: "decapitation has rarely succeeded [and] with good reason efforts to kill or capture insurgent leaders inject energy into the system by generating grievances and causing disparate groups to coalesce".

All this considered then, by channelling an apparent "shoot first, never ask questions at all" ethos, there's a good argument to be madethat much of SOTG's workin the final years of the Afghan War was counter-productive.

In many ways, the sunset years of operations in Afghanistan marked a transitional moment in the Australian way of war one which saw our special forces transformed into the hyper-conventional juggernaut it has become today.

In other Western forces, the over-emphasis on "conventionalised" operations that is heavy-hitting operations which deviate from the subtle and indirect approach of yesteryear has had similar results on the ground.

The New Zealand SAS is currently reeling from allegations that its members carried out "revenge raids" against civilians. US Navy SEAL Teams have now been linked to extra-judicial killings and corpse desecration on the battlefield. In Britain too, the story is much the same. Reports of "rogue" SAS troopers and battlefield executions. Civilian casualties. A Ministry of Defence probe into war crimes allegations.

Incident by incident, this is how the war in Afghanistan was lost.

Despite more than a decade and a half of sustained military effort, today Taliban and other extremist groups cover as much as 40 per cent of the country.

Certainly, where our own efforts are concerned, the data is clear. Australia's war in Afghanistan was a failure. According to the Institute for the Study of War, districts like Shah Wali Kot (where Corporal Ben Roberts-Smith's VC-winning charge took place) are now categorised as "high confidence Taliban support zones".

Elsewhere, the observable metrics on the ground speak for themselves. In 2002, US intelligence estimated the Taliban's strength at 7,000 fighters. As of 2016, that number has increased to 25,000. As this year's spring fighting season begins, the Taliban still control roughly a quarter of Afghanistan.

More than anything, what these new revelations demonstrate is that somewhere along the way our military, and our special forces in particular, simply lost the ability to effectively counter an insurgency.

Once upon a time, "the best of the best" were trained to operate like "phantoms" treading lightly and prudently alongside their local partners.

Today, however, the legacy they will leave behind in the minds of Afghans will be a brutal one. The civilian cost of the Special Operations Task Group's operations in Afghanistan is now apparent for all to see.

C August Elliott is a former soldier and writer.

Topics: unrest-conflict-and-war, defence-and-national-security, defence-forces, army, afghanistan, australia

First posted July 12, 2017 12:48:00

See the original post here:
'Land, kill and leave': How Australian special forces helped lose the war in Afghanistan - ABC Online

The FINANCIAL -- The Afghanistans Ministry of Finance on July 12 signed a financing package of $482.3 million in grants with the World Bank to help the country through a difficult phase in its struggle to end poverty.

It signals a long-term commitment by both parties to the countrys development and people.

The package will help Afghanistan support communities with refugees, expand private-sector opportunities for the poor, boost the development of five cities, expand electrification, improve food security, and build rural roads. The financing includes grants from the International Development Association (IDA), the World Banks fund for the poorest countries, as well as contributions from the Afghanistan Reconstruction Trust Fund (ARTF), managed by the World Bank on behalf of 34 donors, according to the World Bank.

This package of assistance is a reaffirmation of our joint commitment to address development and economic challenges faced by our people. Better service delivery, improved living conditions and more job opportunities will be created. Our people in both rural and urban areas will be the main beneficiaries of this assistance," said HE Eklil Hakimi, Finance Minister of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. All this assistance will be channeled through the national budget and will be spent with full transparency and effectiveness.

The new funding package aims to support efforts of the Government of Afghanistan to stimulate growth and ensure service delivery during a time of uncertainty when risks to the economy are significant. The international troop withdrawal, begun in 2011, coupled with political uncertainties, have resulted in a slowdown of economic growth, while government budget pressures are increasing as security threats mount and drive people from their homes.

Todays signing of the new financing reaffirms the World Bank Groups commitment to the Afghan people as they strive to overcome daunting development challenges compounded by a difficult security environment, said Shubham Chaudhuri, World Bank Country Director for Afghanistan. We are encouraged by the governments determination to build upon progress to date in several areas, including institutional reforms, revenue generation, and provision of basic services in health, education, and rural access sectors.

The $482.3 million financing package consists of seven grants:

$172 million in additional financing from IDA ($127.7 million) and the ARTF ($44.3 million) to the Citizens Charter Afghanistan Project to support communities with internally displaced persons and returnees from Pakistan;

$100 million from IDA to the Inclusive Growth Development Policy Grant to support reforms that expand access to economic opportunities for the vulnerable and promote private sector development;

$20 million from IDA to the Urban Development Support Project to strengthen urban policy-making in national agencies, and reinforce urban management and service delivery in five provincial capital cities;

$60 million from IDA to the Herat Electrification Project to provide access to electricity to households, institutions, and businesses in selected areas of Herat Province;

$20.3 million from IDA to the Afghanistan Strategic Grain Reserve Project to finance establishing strategic wheat reserves and improve the efficiency of grain storage management;

$105 million in additional financing from the ARTF to the Afghanistan Rural Access Project, which aims to benefit rural communities through access to all-season roads.

$5 million project preparation grant from the ARTF to support the establishment of a Womens Economic Empowerment National Priority Programme (WEE-NPP) Support Project, which aims to advance womens access to economic assets and opportunities.

Original post:
Government of Afghanistan Signs $482.3 million New Financing - The FINANCIAL

Country Brief

Afghanistan is a landlocked Least Developed Country (LDC) located in Southern Asia, North and West of Pakistan, East of Iran. Afghanistan's economy is recovering from decades of conflict and has seen a significant growth since 2001. Afghanistan has a narrow export base concentrated in few markets. Main export items are carpets & rugs and dried fruits. Main export partners include Pakistan, India and Iran. Petroleum, machinery and equipment, food items and base metals are main import items and main import partners are Pakistan, China, Japan, Russia and Iran. The country is undergoing the World Trade Organization (WTO) accession process.

Notes: Top 20 products listed in decreasing order of their export potential to the world. Development indicators are relative to the countrys current situation, green indicating performance above its trade-weighted median and red otherwise. A blank cell indicates that data are not available. A blank cell in export potential means that the product was not consistently demanded over five years by any country in the respective region. Exports (US$ thousand) correspond to average exports to the world over the period 2009-2013.

Link:
Afghanistan - ITC