Archive for the ‘Afghanistan’ Category

Dont Believe the Generals on Afghanistan – The Atlantic

A T-shirt that was popular with veterans for much of Americas nearly 20-year war in Afghanistan showed a helicopter in flight with the caption We Were Winning When I Left. U.S. generals seem to be the only ones who didnt get the joke. On the first anniversary of our botched withdrawal, the military leaders most responsible for Americas disastrous outcome in Afghanistan have continued to loudly insist that the war was winnable when they were in charge, and that responsibility for the debacle must lie with someone else.

Retired Generals Frank McKenzie and Joseph Votel, the last two commanders of U.S. Central Command, which includes Afghanistan, recently made the case that America should have stayed indefinitely, arguing that the pullout was a mistake and that America could have defended its interestsand kept the Taliban at baywith a small residual force of a few thousand soldiers. And in The Atlantic, the retired general and former CIA director David Petraeus, who commanded the war in Afghanistan after presiding over the surge that helped bring temporary stability to Iraq, wrote that more than a decade ago we had finally established the right big ideas and overarching strategy. But the problem, he maintained, was that America did not have the stomach for a sustained, generational commitment.

A sustained, generational commitment? The United States spent more than $2 trillion in Afghanistan and sacrificed the lives of 2,461 service members over those two decades. And in that time, the top brass mostly got their way. President Barack Obama caved to his generals, agreeing to a substantial troop surge in a war he was trying to end. President Donald Trump did the same on a smaller scale, entering office on a promise to end the war but eventually agreeing to a mini-surge and deferring a full withdrawal to his successor.

From the magazine: My escape from Afghanistan

The outcome of Americas commitment was an Afghan government and military that couldnt hold out long enough even for U.S. forces to leave with a semblance of dignity. The right big ideas deployed by a generation of generals proved to be empty slogans: government in a box, money as a weapons system, ink spots. All of these were tactical approaches or overly simplistic frameworks that ignored the nuances of Afghan politics and the reality of attempting to modernize a fractured country that was mired in corruption and a continuing civil war.

This myth of a sustainable stalemate is contradicted by a mountain of evidence and experience. U.S. casualties in the Afghan Wars last years remained low because of the Doha Agreement, whatever its flaws. The Kabul governments forces that had to fight and win the war were losing gradually and then suddenly, as Ernest Hemingway described bankruptcy.

By 2017, Afghan army and police recruiting began to dry up, a result of high casualties, corruption, and mistreatment, as well as successful Taliban propaganda that capitalized on those failures. Later that year, the U.S. government classified Afghan security forces size and stopped collecting district stability data, a fraught but valuable metric of security. These were not the hallmarks of a winning campaign. General McKenzie admitted to the Senate Armed Services Committee in 2018 that Afghan security forces were suffering unsustainable attrition. And when Afghan forces failed in battle with the tools and training we had given them, the answer from the generals was not to shift our approach but always to ask for more time and more money.

We both first deployed to Afghanistan more than a decade ago; our combined experience in the war covers the period from 2009 to 2014. What became clear during those deployments was that the war was a fundamentally doomed endeavor. Our efforts to build a national Afghan army in the image of our own military were not only ineffective; they also made the Afghan governments crisis of legitimacy worse. We both served alongside a range of Afghan government forces and saw firsthand how the model we were imposing on their military simply did not fit the country we were fighting in.

In June 2011, a full decade before last years total withdrawal, President Obama announced a major troop reduction in Afghanistan and a future responsible end to the war. Trump successfully campaigned in 2016 on a pullout promise; as president, he signed the February 2020 Doha Agreement that would deliver just that. President Joe Biden ordered an Afghanistan policy review, and then chose to delay the withdrawal but ultimately honor the Doha terms.

Read: The Afghanistan withdrawal: a potential disaster in the making

In the face of all these signals that the U.S. intervention was coming to an end, Americas generals seemed to think they could keep a small war in Afghanistan going forever. If the war didnt end, hard questions about the fundamental flaws in execution never had to be acknowledged. U.S. military leaders could continue to pretend that they had achieved something in the country.

As for the inevitable chaos of the withdrawal itself, the U.S. State Department deserves most of the blame for the shameful condition of the Afghan Special Immigrant Visa program, which prevented tens of thousands of our Afghan partners from getting out of the country safely, and the White House must own some final operational and timing decisions in Kabul. But the bulk of the blame for the failures of analysis, planning, and execution still rests on the shoulders of our military and its leaders. They built a house of cards in Afghanistan. As years of reporting and research have shown, whether it would come crashing down was never in doubt; it was only a matter of when and how.

Defeat is a bitter pill for any army to swallow. And unfortunately, blaming operational and tactical failures on politics at homea stab in the backis a long and dangerous tradition: You can find Iraq and Vietnam versions of that sardonic T-shirt. Plenty of blame can be spread around for Americas defeat in its longest foreign war. But dont let the generals fool you: We were losing when they left.

Excerpt from:
Dont Believe the Generals on Afghanistan - The Atlantic

Book Review: Ackerman, Chomsky, and Prashad on Afghanistan, America, and the Taliban – Foreign Policy

The betrayal of Afghanistan by the United States was inked on Feb. 29, 2020, when an emissary of then-U.S. President Donald Trump signed a bilateral deal with the unreconstructed terrorist-led crime gang known as the Taliban, which U.S. forces had spent the last two decades fighting. The agreement sealed the withdrawal of all U.S. military forces who had been supporting Afghanistans democratic experiment for those same two decades, in exchange for empty Taliban promises about breaking ties with terrorists. The deal essentially handed the Taliban the victory theyd so long sought.

But the betrayal wasnt completed until Aug. 30, 2021, when the last U.S. military transport plane left Kabul crammed with scores of desperate people who feared for their lives in a Taliban-ruled state. The final liftoff came after two weeks of pandemonium that followed the hurried flight of former Afghan President Ashraf Ghani and his circle.

There would be no Saigon moment in Afghanistan, U.S. President Joe Biden said of the departure from Kabul of American soldiers, diplomats, and Afghans who had worked with them, after he decided to abide by Trumps Taliban deal. But the terror, chaos, and violence of those last days were as bad as anything that led up to the last choppers on the roof of the U.S. Embassy in Saigon on April 30, 1975, as the United States cut and ran from South Vietnam. Young men clung to the undercarriages of planes as they taxied for takeoff from Kabuls international airport; some died as they plummeted to the tarmac. The horrific scenes, the capstone to Americas Afghan misadventure, were painfully reminiscent of the nameless silhouettes seen leaping from New Yorks blazing Twin Towers after al Qaedas terrorist attack on Sept. 11, 2001, the event that precipitated the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in the first place.

With Americas departure from Afghanistan, its so-called war on terror had come full circle. The homeland was safe, and the troops were back home. Americas forever war, its longest, was over. Afghanistans isnt. Those left behind are emotionally and physically scarred and were left to their fate as vengeful, victorious extremists began their pogroms against perceived enemies, reprisals that continue today with impunity. Many millions of people are hungry, jobless, and penniless, some so desperate to feed themselves and their families that they have sold children and body parts for money to buy food. Many of those who need to escape from Afghanistan are in hiding; many more are waiting for the knock on the door that could spell interrogation, torture, or death. In Afghanistan, no one can hear you scream.

Even those who made it out are suffering: Hundreds of thousands of Afghans who were evacuated remain depressed and discombobulated by the disappearance of the lives they knew and wonder if theyll ever be able to go home again. Many are refugees for the second or third time, a testament to the vicious cycle that is countrys recent history.

Inside and out of Afghanistan, they ask why their country has been allowed to turn dark, their friends and families hunted down for their ethnicity, their religion, or their past affiliations with the government or its security forces. They ask why women are virtually locked indoors, girls all but barred from education, if not raped, killed, and forgotten. There are no answers to the question: Why?

A pair of recent books, from radically different perspectives, seek to grapple with the question, if not quite finding the answer. Betrayal is a theme that runs through both. The authors are under no illusion that this disaster in Afghanistan is of Americas doing. As soon as the United States began its troop drawdown to zero, upon the signing of Trumps deal with the Taliban, NATO partners began their own rush to the exits; the U.S.-trained Afghan army wasnt far behind in collapsing.

The Fifth Act: Americas End in Afghanistan, Elliot Ackerman, Penguin, 288 pp., $27, August 2022 The Withdrawal: Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and the Fragility of U.S. Power, Noam Chomsky and Vijay Prashad, New Press, 224 pp., $24.99, August 2022

The Fifth Act: Americas End in Afghanistan is a memoir by Elliot Ackerman, a former U.S. Marine and CIA operative, who grapples with the weight of his own involvement in a now-lost cause as he attempts to lend a hand in the evacuation process immediately after the Talibans takeover. Its a tome tinged with guilt, the guilt felt by many with a connection to Afghanistan who watched the human horror unfold far away, and the guilt they still feel as the pleas keep coming: Help me, Im desperate, I have no money, my children are hungry. I worked for the United States, for Britain, for Germany. Im gay, Im a journalist, Im a woman. Please help. Help is not on the way.

Less personally engaged, but no less angry, is The Withdrawal: Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan and the Fragility of U.S. Power. The book is a conversation between linguist, activist, and political gadfly Noam Chomsky and Vijay Prashad, who runs a left-leaning think tank. They discuss the origins and excesses of U.S. foreign policy since Americas post-World War II rise as global hegemon. Chomsky stays true to form with his critiques of the legacy of imperialism, whether British, Portuguese, French, or American, that has culminated this century alone in the disruption and destruction of societies in Iraq, Libya, and Afghanistanand beyond. After a lifetime of telling us so, the book is Chomskys latest I told you so. Few listened.

Ackerman is thoughtful and regretful, a man who cares deeply for the people he believes he and his buddies in the Marines and the CIA fought for. His conscience was clouded by Americas wars for years, as he makes clear in the recounting of targeted killing campaignswhich Chomsky and Prashad call the worst terrorist campaign in the world by far. Ackerman believes those programs violated the U.S. prohibition on government-directed assassinations.

[L]awyers working for multiple presidential administrations had drawn up semantic arguments carefully delineating the difference between a targeted killing and an assassination, he writes. But when the picture of the person you were trying to kill sat on your desk, when you watched the predator [drone] strikes light up the night sky and then when you took that same picture and moved it into a file for archiving, it sure felt like an assassination. To the hearts and minds of the local populations living under that deadly rain, it surely must have, too, as they turned increasingly sour on the presence of foreign soldiers.

The heart of Ackermans narrative is the Afghan endgame, long after hed left the country. The fall of Kabul caught him on vacation in Italy, and the contrast between sunshiny days, rooftop restaurants, and his children playing at gladiators contrasted cruelly with the distress of those trying to navigate the chaos of Kabul for a desperate flight to freedom. Some, Ackerman could help; many, he could not.

Ackerman scours his WhatsApp and Signal threads in a vivid retelling of the failures and successes that provided the all-too-human dimension of the evacuation efforts. The tension and drama unfold like a movie script: a pacey, urgent, heart-in-throat, will-they-make-it-this-time narrative as he communicates with fellow Americans and veterans who are trying to get Afghans through the horrible gauntlet surrounding the airport entrances and onto planes that will fly them to safety. At one point, we are in the lobby of a fine Kabul hotel, standing among terrified Afghan friends and colleagues as the decision is made to board a fleet of buses to chance a run to the airport, before they turn back, hoping to try again tomorrow.

Across Europe, the United States, Australia, and all over the world, well-meaning people mobilized their contacts to collate and vet thousands and thousands of names that could otherwise become epitaphs to the Taliban takeover. They lobbied governments, politicians, activists, nongovernmental organizations, wealthy people with private jets, interest groups, human rights defenders, anyone at all who could potentially help get people out of hell before the Taliban found them. Operations like those that Ackerman was involved in were life-saving airlifts for anyone lucky enough to get on the right list, the right bus, arrive at the right gate, wave to the right soldier, know the right people with the right contacts to get them on a crowded plane headed somewhere, anywhere else.

Whereas for Ackerman, the story is personal, especially the awful endgame, for Chomsky and Prashad, it is intellectual. If Ackerman focuses more on the final act, Chomsky and Prashads quest for the source of betrayal focuses more on what they see as the original sin. The allied invasion of Taliban-ruled Afghanistan that began on Oct. 7, 2001, was illegal, Chomsky says, serving only as a warning to anyone who would challenge American supremacy. As if the 9/11 attacks had never happened, he says that it was unprovoked, it was an illegitimate aggression, and it was a severe atrocity. That cherry-picked history overlooks both the universal condemnation of al Qaedas attack and the immediate United Nations Security Council resolution that stressed that those responsible for aiding, supporting or harboring the perpetrators, organizers and sponsors of these acts will be held accountable, an unequivocal reference to the Taliban then controlling Afghanistan who had hosted Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda as the attacks were planned and carried out. But Chomsky is right that those who paid the biggest price for the U.S. intervention were the people of Afghanistan, who themselves had nothing to do with 9/11 but have been paying for it for more than 20 years.

Washington repeatedly called on the Taliban to hand over bin Laden before and after 9/11, and it had been repeatedly rebuffed. But Chomsky and Prashad, like other scholars of the Afghan War, find fault with the George W. Bush administrations refusal to negotiate with the Taliban to that end. Carter Malkasian, in The American War in Afghanistan: A History, wrote that the Bush team was under pressure to ensure the United States was safe from future terrorist attacks, but it missed two opportunities to avoid a long warconvincing the Taliban to hand over bin Laden, and including the Taliban in the post-2001 political landscape. These were the signal mistakes that led to the 20-year quagmire and thousands of deaths, Chomsky and Prashad argue in a section titled The Godfather, comparing the United States to a mob family.

[T]he Taliban understood the gravity of a U.S. attack after 9/11 and made it clear on several occasions that it would be prepared to hand over Osama bin Laden and the al-Qaeda network to a third country, Chomsky and Prashad write. Their plea for a settlement was rejected because, they add, When the United States wants war, it gets a war.

And what a war it got. Gangsters, murderers, and drug dealers exploited the local ignorance of the foreign forces to eliminate their own enemies, while a spigot of cash poured into the coffers of the corrupt appointees who masqueraded as a government. Of the trillions of dollars spent by the United States alone, billions remain unaccounted for, their disappearance logged by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, set up by the U.S. Congress to follow the money.

Chomsky and Prashad find fault in the endgame, too, blaming the vested interests of a military-industrial complex that serves to benefit the Western elite and multiply and secure its wealth. U.S. asset freezes on Afghan central bank funds that could today finance the Taliban are, for Chomsky and Prashad, just another theft. What possible benefit, Chomsky asks, could there be for the masters of the universe in battering the country to dust for 20 years and then robbing the Afghan people of their own money, condemning them by this cruelest of current crimes to imminent starvation?

For Chomsky and Prashad, the war in Afghanistan is just one more piece in the United States quest to put together its hegemonic jigsaw puzzle. For Ackerman, by contrast, the war helped achieve the essential objectives of the global war on terror by keeping the U.S. homeland safe. But he, too, ponders the cost of this successnot only in the thousands of lives lost or ruined, but also in the financial cost to the American people who have barely noticed the grim toll on their democracy of a long war fought by a volunteer military and paid for on credit. He notes that 2001 was the last federal budget passed by Congress that had a surplus. He fears, too, a creeping politicization of the military, warning that history from Julius Caesar to Napoleon Bonaparte shows that when a republic couples a large standing military with dysfunctional domestic politics, democracy doesnt last long.

As we mark the first anniversary of the Talibans return to power and the final act of Americas betrayal, genuinely reasonable people watch slack-jawed while the Islamists squabble violently among themselves as they further brutalize a long-brutalized population. The neighboring states that cheered the departure of the United States now despair of transforming their problem child into a credible, responsible creature.

On Aug. 14, 2021, just hours before the Taliban entered Kabul and declared the war over, Biden told the people of the United States that the point of the war had already vanished 10 years earlier, with the death of bin Laden. Now, he said, its time for the Afghan people to take responsibility for themselves; the United States, he warned, would hold the Taliban accountable for its promises to stop cooperating with terrorists. And it has: At the end of July, a U.S. drone strike killed bin Ladens successor, al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri, who was living as a guest of the Taliban in a Kabul villa. From beginning to even after the end, the United States put homeland security first. Ackerman fought for it. Chomsky resents it. And the Afghans?

Almost exactly a year after Biden made that speech, this Aug. 13, brave young women marched through the streets of Kabul carrying banners that mourned a black day as they demanded their now-vanished rights to work, to learn, to be free. Taliban gunmen fired over their heads, beat them, and detained them. They, like a lot of American hopes and promises, are lost in the Talibans Afghanistan, where no one can hear them scream.

Go here to read the rest:
Book Review: Ackerman, Chomsky, and Prashad on Afghanistan, America, and the Taliban - Foreign Policy

Afghanistans Taliban mark anniversary of US-led force withdrawal – Al Jazeera English

The Taliban swept to power with ease last August after a 20-year conflict against US-led forces ended in a hasty withdrawal by all foreign troops.

The Taliban have celebrated the first anniversary of the withdrawal of US-led forces from Afghanistan with a military parade showcasing equipment left behind by foreign troops and calls for their government to be accepted as legitimate internationally.

Fireworks lit up the sky over Kabul on Tuesday night on the anniversary of the withdrawal and Wednesday was also a public holiday, with small celebrations across Kabul including parades by Taliban forces.

The US withdrawal, completed a minute before midnight on August 30, 2021, came as the Taliban swept to power after a 20-year war against US-led forces who invaded Afghanistan following the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States.

The experience of the past 20 years can be a good guide Any kind of pressure and threats on Afghanistans people in the last 20 years has failed and just increased the crisis, the Taliban said in a statement on Wednesday.

The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan the name the Taliban give their government is the legitimate government of the country and the representative of the brave Afghan nation, the statement said.

The Taliban statement called on the international community to allow Afghans to have an independent Islamic government that has a positive interaction with the world.

No country has recognised the Taliban, who took over Afghanistan with a speed and ease that took the world by surprise.

The international community has pressed the Taliban on human rights, particularly those of girls and women whose access to school and work has been limited. It has also urged the Taliban to stop harassing critics, activists, and journalists.

The Taliban say they are discussing the matter of girls education and deny cracking down on dissent.

The celebration also included a military parade at Bagram Airbase, the nerve centre of US forces during the war.

Groups of Taliban fighters marched as helicopters flew by, video footage aired by state television showed. Minutes later, dozens of military vehicles including the iconic US militarys Humvees and tanks, seized in the war or left behind by US forces during their chaotic withdrawal, were paraded.

Prime Minister Mohammad Hassan Akhund said in speech marking the withdrawal that the Taliban had put an end to killings and bombing and had ensured national security, according to the local channel TOLOnews.

He said that sanctions on Afghanistan had increased poverty and that understanding would achieve better results than pressure, according to the news channel.

Banners celebrating victories against three empires the former Soviet Union and Britain also lost wars in Afghanistan flew in Kabul.

Hundreds of white Taliban flags bearing the Islamic proclamation of faith flew on streets and government buildings, while squares in the capital were decorated with lights.

Despite the Talibans pride in taking over, Afghanistans 38 million people face a desperate humanitarian crisis aggravated after billions of dollars in Central Bank assets were frozen and foreign aid dried up.

Go here to see the original:
Afghanistans Taliban mark anniversary of US-led force withdrawal - Al Jazeera English

Afghanistan children killed after playing with unexploded ordinance that detonated in classroom – Fox News

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Four children are dead and three others are injured after an unexploded ordnance detonated after being brought into an Afghanistan classroom.

The incident in Afghanistan's Helmand province happened when children discovered an unexploded shell and brought it inside their religious school and started playing with it, according a statement from the provincial police chiefs office.

The children were ages 7 to 14 and at least three others were injured, according to the police statement.

Local officials say that three of the children were killed instantly while an unidentified doctor at a local hospital said another female child died later from her injuries.

AIR FORCE COLONEL RECALLS THE LAST FLIGHTS OUT OF KABUL IN ONE OF THE LARGEST EVACUATIONS IN HISTORY

Covered body of a girl lies in the back of a vehicle after she was killed by unexploded shell in Helmand province, southern Afghanistan, Saturday, Sept. 3, 2022. ((AP Photo/Abdul Khaliq))

Afghanistan has suffered from decades of war and remains highly dangerous for children, who often collect scrap metal to sell to support their families. Many are killed or maimed when they come across unexploded ordnance.

The explosion comes weeks after the one-year anniversary of the United States military withdrawal from Afghanistan following its invasion of the country two decades ago.

AFGHANISTAN MOSQUE EXPLOSION LEAVES 18 DEAD, INCLUDING PRO-TALIBAN CLERIC

Over 41,000 Afghan civilians have been killed or wounded by landmines and other ordnances since the end of the Soviet invasion of the country in the late 1980s, according to the United Nations Mine Action Service (UNMAS).

Covered body of a girl lies in the back of a vehicle after she was killed by unexploded shell in Helmand province, southern Afghanistan, Saturday, Sept. 3, 2022. Unexploded ordnance detonated Saturday in southern Afghanistan killing at least four children and injuring three others after the kids brought it inside their school, police and a doctor said (. (AP Photo/Abdul Khaliq))

More than two-thirds of those killed by unexploded ordnances that detonated were children, many of whom were playing with the bombs after picking them up, VOA News reported.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Associated Press contributed to this report

Andrew Mark Miller is a writer at Fox News. Find him on Twitter @andymarkmiller and email tips to AndrewMark.Miller@Fox.com.

Read the original:
Afghanistan children killed after playing with unexploded ordinance that detonated in classroom - Fox News

Dispute over Pine Nut Harvest in Southeast Afghanistan Results in 2 Deaths and 3 Injuries – The Khaama Press News Agency – The Khaama Press News…

A dispute between two families over the harvesting of pine nuts (Chilgoza)resulted in two fatalities and three injuries, according to local sources in the southeastern Afghan province ofPaktia.

Authorities from the Taliban in the province have confirmed the veracity of the occurrence, which involved a conflict between two families that resulted in the deaths of two people and serious injuries to three more.

According to Omar Badri, the spokesman for the Taliban chief of police in Paktia province, the tragedy took place in the Jani Khail district at around 6:00 in the morning on Saturday, September 3.

The conflict reportedly took place in the village of Dahan Khushk in the Jani Khail district ofPaktia province, and according to local sources, the injured peoples conditions are disconcerting.

Hospital management in the province of Paktia, however,has not yet provided any information about the conditionsof the injured.

A similar incident occurred in late August in the southeast Afghan province of Khost, where a land dispute between two families led to one fatality and 10 injuries.

With the cash-strapped Taliban in power, poverty, hunger, and unemployment at an all-time high, exacerbated by the asset freeze on Afghanistans foreign reserves, the number of crimes, suicides, family disputes, and honor killings has skyrocketed in various regions of Afghanistan.

Original post:
Dispute over Pine Nut Harvest in Southeast Afghanistan Results in 2 Deaths and 3 Injuries - The Khaama Press News Agency - The Khaama Press News...