Archive for the ‘Afghanistan’ Category

Petraeus: We went to Afghanistan for a reason, and we need to stay … – PBS NewsHour

JUDY WOODRUFF: Wars in Afghanistan, Syria, and Iraq, tensions within the Gulf states, and a new administration trying to manage an exploding region, all topics for retired General David Petraeus.

He commanded American and coalition forces in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and served as overall commander of U.S. military operations in the Middle East. He later served as director of the CIA in 2011 and 2012. Hes now with a global investment firm.

We spoke a short time ago.

And I started by asking him about reports that the Trump administration will soon send 4,000 additional U.S. troops to Afghanistan, and whether he thinks it is a smart move.

GEN. DAVID PETRAEUS (RET.), Former Commander, Multi-National Force Iraq: I think it is, and its heartening.

I think what we need to get to in Afghanistan is a sustainable, measuring the expenditure of blood and treasure, a sustainable, sustained commitment. We need to recognize that we went there for a reason and we stayed for a reason, to ensure that Afghanistan is not once again a sanctuary for al-Qaida or other transnational extremists, the way it was when the 9/11 attacks were planned there.

Thats why we need to stay. We also have a very useful platform there for the regional counterterrorist effort. And, of course, we have greatly reduced the capabilities of al-Qaidas senior leaders in that region, including, of course, taking out Osama bin Laden.

But this is a generational struggle. This is not something that is going to be won in a few years. Were not going to take a hill, plant a flag, go home to a victory parade. And we need to be there for the long haul, but in a way that is, again, sustainable.

We have been in Korea for 65-plus years because there is an important national interest for that. We were in Europe for a very long period of time, still there, of course, and actually with a renewed emphasis now, given Russias aggressive actions.

And I think thats the way we need to approach this. Now, to be sure, the forces

(CROSSTALK)

JUDY WOODRUFF: Are you saying we may need to stay in Afghanistan 60, 70, 80 years?

GEN. DAVID PETRAEUS: I wouldnt say 60, but I think we shouldnt approach this as a year-on-year mission.

I think that was actually harmful. I think it gave all of the Afghan leaders and so forth were basically get the jitters. Those who are investing money consider every year whether to keep it there or whether to go to Dubai.

I think this is an important interest, and I think we ought to have a sustained commitment, but at a level that is sustainable. And I think a few more, 3,000 to 5,000 more troops, are very sustainable, but also we should relax the remaining restrictions on the use of our airpower to support our Afghan partners who have shown that they are willing to fight and die for their country against al-Qaida, the insurgents of various types and so forth.

JUDY WOODRUFF: But, of course, the reason Im asking, as Americans look at Afghanistan, you say we may need to stay decades and decades. We have been there, the United States, 15 years. At times, we have had over 100,000 U.S. troops there. That didnt turn back the Taliban. Why should 3,000 or 4,000?

GEN. DAVID PETRAEUS: It did actually turn back the Taliban.

You will remember I was the commander.

JUDY WOODRUFF: But not permanently.

GEN. DAVID PETRAEUS: Not permanently.

As I said, we are not going to permanently win this. Keep in mind, theres a huge difference between Afghanistan and even Iraq when we did the surge there. You cant pressure the leaders of the Afghan Taliban, the Haqqani Network, and even some of the other insurgent groups, because theyre out of our reach. Theyre in sanctuaries inside Pakistan.

And, indeed, there should be a regional effort there to try to get our Pakistani partners to do more to deny this sanctuary to those elements that are making life so difficult for Afghans and the Afghan government.

JUDY WOODRUFF: The other comment being made, General Petraeus, though, is that the administration has not laid out what its strategy is for Afghanistan. General Mattis himself said this week, were still working on it.

GEN. DAVID PETRAEUS: They are.

And, indeed, I understand there have been a number of meetings at the principals level and so forth. The national security team is working on that. I do think you can anticipate an integrated strategy.

Again, the troops are just a part of this. Theyre an important part, because, without them, without halting the erosion of security that has characterized Afghanistan over the last year or more, then youre going to have a serious problem on your hands.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Lets talk about ISIS in Syria you mentioned Syria and in Iraq. We are told progress is being made against ISIS on the battlefield, but the coalition airstrikes, we are now told, these Strikes are resulting in hundreds and hundreds of civilian deaths.

Is that the price that Americans should be prepared to pay to get ahead of ISIS?

GEN. DAVID PETRAEUS: We should absolutely minimize the civilian deaths, and theres no question that there will be more of these. This does happen in wartime.

There will be far fewer than certainly what the extremists, these very barbaric Islamic State forces, have done. But this is an enemy thats literally sheltering among the civilians. Thats whats making it so difficult to take this last remnant of the Islamic State in Mosul.

This is now old Mosul, the Old City. And, remember, I spent a year there as a two-star when we were in charge of Northern Iraq with the 101st Airborne. Its a rabbits warren. Its very tight. Its very difficult.

And the enemy has literally just literally barricaded itself in there with snipers, with suicide bombers, with explosives, rooms and houses rigged, surrounding themselves with civilians. And this is the most diabolically difficult challenge, even for the very skilled counterterrorism forces of the Iraqi army.

Thats whats really slowed this down. We can expect some of that in Raqqa. That operation has now began in Syria. That was until recently presumably the Islamic State headquarters. There are reports that some of these leaders have already led and moved town the Euphrates River Valley further to Deir el-Zour.

Thats going to be a tough fight, but its a much smaller city compared to the two million, lets say, of probably a quarter or less the size of Mosul.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Im moving us through some very difficult areas very quickly, but I now want to turn now to Saudi Arabia, the Gulf nations.

President Trump was there just very recently trying to put present a united front with the Saudis and these other countries, mainly against Iran, but it turns out they are they have turned against Qatar, and the president has signaled that he has problems with Qatars support for terrorist activities.

At the same time, his administration has said, we hope these countries can work together.

What is the strategy, the approach that the United that we should expect, that we should understand as Americans about the administrations policy there?

GEN. DAVID PETRAEUS: Well, Secretary of State Tillerson is taking charge of this now. Hes trying to get the temperature down some.

Clearly, theres been a frustration that boiled over with the Emiratis, our close partners the Emiratis and the Saudis, against our other close partners the Qataris. Of course, its the Central Command forward headquarters. My forward headquarters is inside outside Doha at Al Udeid Air Base.

They gave us $100 million for that. But I have to say, at times, I went there and said, look, youre giving us all this money for our forward headquarters, and then Al-Jazeera is hammering us every day in the news. There is something not right here.

And similar frustrations have, again, just boiled over, also, the allegations of support of political Islam. You have to understand that, for the Emiratis especially, there is more worry about Muslim Brotherhood kind of activity than there actually is with Iran or even the Islamic State.

Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed will explain, we can see the extremists, we can see the Iranians. The insidious creep of political Islam is more difficult. And Qatar has allowed the heads of Hamas, Muslim Brothers, other political Islam organizations in the region to locate there.

These are all three our friends, our partners. I hope would be that, in this case, Secretary of State Tillerson can indeed get the temperatures down, get talking going on behind closed doors, rather than out as visibly as it has been, because that makes it very difficult, and you start to back different friends into corners.

But its hard. The United States, in some respects, needs to avoid being engaged in a beauty contest, where we have to say which is the fairest of them all. Thats not fair to us and its not fair to them. And I think that this is resolvable, but its not going to be easy.

JUDY WOODRUFF: General David Petraeus, thank you very much for stopping by.

GEN. DAVID PETRAEUS: Pleasure, as always.

See the original post:
Petraeus: We went to Afghanistan for a reason, and we need to stay ... - PBS NewsHour

Pakistan reaffirms support for peace, stability in Afghanistan – Pajhwok Afghan News (subscription) (blog)

KABUL (Pajhwok): Pakistan has reaffirmed its commitment for durable peace and stability in Afghanistan, a media report said on Saturday.

Pakistan State and Frontier Regions Minister Abdul Qadir Baloch said his country would extend its full cooperation for peace and stability in Afghanistan, according to radio Pakistan.

The minister also urged Pakistani parliamentarians to support the government on security and peace related issues of Afghanistan.

Relation between the two neighbouring countries remained tense over the issues of terrorism and Pakistans lack of sincerity to lasting peace and stability in Afghanistan.

During recently held Shanghai Cooperation Organisation meeting both, AfghanistanandPakistan agreed on taking action against the terrorist groups that pose threats to the security of the two countries, President Ashraf Ghanis office has said.

Ghani and Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, at a meeting in Astana, also agreed on the formation of a joint working group to address the issue of terrorism, a scourge haunting the region.

nh

View post:
Pakistan reaffirms support for peace, stability in Afghanistan - Pajhwok Afghan News (subscription) (blog)

Afghanistan: Pentagon says no decision yet on number of …

The Pentagon has not made a final decision about how many troops will be sent to Afghanistan to try and break the stalemate in that country's 16-year-long war, two senior defense officials told Fox News Thursday.

The officials said that Defense Secretary Jim Mattis told Congress on multiple occasions this week that a new strategy would not be delivered until mid-July. Their statements contradict an Associated Press report that claimed almost 4,000 additional U.S. troops would go to Afghanistan and an announcement could come as soon as next week.

For the past two months, the Pentagon has been considering sending between 3,000 and 5,000 U.S. troops to help train and advise Afghan forces.

Defense Secretary Jim Mattis before he testifies at a House Armed Services Committee hearing on Capitol Hill, Monday, June 12, 2017. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

This week, President Trump gave Mattis the authority to decide how many troops he needed in Afghanistan. In April, the president granted Mattis similar authority to decide how many U.S. forces were needed to fight ISIS in Syria and Iraq.

Over the course of four separate appearances before lawmakers this week, Mattis said he wanted U.S. troops to operate alongside the Afghan Army and help them by calling in airstrikes in the hope of making an impact on the battlefield against the Taliban. Currently, the military operates in more of a planning role alongside Afghan forces.

Earlier this week, Mattis told a Senate panel the Obama administration's decision to cut the number of troops in Afghanistan and put restrictions on air power was "misguided."

"When we reduced our forces there, I believe in, what was probably in hindsight a misguided application of our forces, we restricted them from using our air support with some idea that we would wean them off the need of it," Mattis said to the Senate Appropriations defense subcommittee.

The number of American airstrikes in Afghanistan have increased significantly under President Trump. April saw more bombs dropped there than in any month since 2012, according to the Air Force.

In February, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, Gen. John W. Nicholson, said he needed a "few thousand" additional troops from the United States and NATO.

U.S. forces and Afghan security police are seen in Asad Khil near the site of a U.S. bombing in the Achin district of Jalalabad, east of Kabul, Afghanistan. (AP Photo)

Since then, the Pentagon has been planning for an increase and taking recommendations to the White House. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Joseph F. Dunford, Jr. told Congress this week that President Trump has seen some of the early plans. Officials tell Fox News that there have been a number of National Security Council meetings at the White House as different options are discussed, according to officials.

Earlier this week, Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., chided Mattis and Dunford for not having a strategy in Afghanistan.

Mattis responded by admitting that the U.S. "isn't winning," making him the latest senior U.S. military leader to describe the war against Islamic extremists in Afghanistan as a stalemate.

Today there are 8,400 American troops on the ground in Afghanistan, down from a high of 100,000 ground forces in August 2010. Shortly before leaving office, President Barack Obama ordered 1,500 troops withdrawn from the country after scrapping plans for a near-total withdrawal that was supposed to take place by the end of 2016.

Last weekend, three U.S. Army soldiers were shot and killed by Afghan soldiers in a reminder of the danger facing Americans there.

A farmer works on his field, on the outskirts of the village of Madakhel, Afghanistan. (AP Photo/Enric Marti)

Today, the U.S. military estimates that the Afghan government only controls roughly 60 percent of the country. The Taliban is the most prominent insurgent group, but they are not the only concern. ISIS-affiliated fighters have taken hold of portions of eastern Afghanistan.

On Thursday, ISIS claimed to have captured Tora Bora, a mountain hideout in Afghanistan once used by Usama bin Laden, but the Taliban dismissed the claim, saying they were still in control of the cave complex.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Lucas Tomlinson is the Pentagon and State Department producer for Fox News Channel. You can follow him on Twitter: @LucasFoxNews

Here is the original post:
Afghanistan: Pentagon says no decision yet on number of ...

The Pentagon Is Reportedly Going to Send 4000 More US Troops to Afghanistan – New York Magazine

Ad will collapse in seconds CLOSE June 16, 2017 06/16/2017 1:39 pm By Adam K. Raymond Share Three of the U.S. soldiers already in Afghanistan. Photo: Ernesto Londoo/The Washington Post/Getty Images

Defense Secretary Jim Mattis will announce plans to send as many as 4,000 additional U.S. forces to Afghanistan next week in an attempt to help the withering Afghan military, the AP reports.

The U.S. currently has around 8,400 troops assisting the Afghan military in Afghanistan. Theyre serving alongside another 5,000 troops from NATO forces. The increase in American boots on the ground is needed to slow the progress of the Taliban, Mattis told the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday.

The Taliban had a good year last year, and theyre trying to have a good one this year, he said. Mattis added that additional U.S. troops would provide air and artillery support to Afghan forces, who have seen 5,000 killed in 2016 alone.

Mattis has only this week gained the power to set troop levels in Afghanistan, an authority granted by President Trump on Tuesday. The move drew harsh criticism from the New York Times editorial board, which said it leaves the impression that he is cowed by the weighty responsibility of sending more Americans into battle, and is looking to put that onus on Mr. Mattis so he has somebody to blame if things go wrong.

Other critics have questioned the wisdom of sending new troops to Afghanistan without a clearly defined strategy. At Tuesdays hearing with Mattis, Senator John McCain emphasized the need for a plan. Were now six months into this administration, he said. We still havent got a strategy for Afghanistan. It makes it hard for us to support you when we dont have a strategy.

Another person whos not so sure about Mattiss plan to build up troops is the anonymous veteran who sent this depressing message to Washington Post reporter Thomas Gibbons-Neff.

19 Unsettlingly Nice Tom Cruise Stories

Barack Obama Inducts Jay Z Into the Songwriters Hall of Fame

How Sex Is Orchestrated on Reality Shows Like Bachelor in Paradise

All 206 Beatles Songs Ranked, From Worst to Best

The Story Behind Orange Is the New Blacks Torture Scene and the Deleted Moment That Alters Piscatellas Story

What the Hell Is Happening With Qatar?

Is Trump Inc. the Presidents Greatest Vulnerability?

The Book of Henry Must Be Seen to Be Believed (But Please Dont See It)

Aziz Ansari Recaps the Master of None Finale: Its Not a Flashback

What Mass Killers Really Have in Common

Most Popular Video On Daily Intelligencer

Trump has made it impossible for Republicans to claim he is naive. Now, his behavior can only be explained by a guilty conscience or an unsound mind.

Look at this tweet, every time I do it makes me laugh.

The property was listed for rent on Thursday, and its already been snatched up.

The president is clamping down on travel to and trade with the communist country.

There are currently 8,400 U.S. troops in the country, along with 5,000 NATO soldiers.

That would leave Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand in charge. Heres what you need to know about her.

Michelle Carter sent her boyfriend, Conrad Roy, numerous texts urging him to kill himself.

Obamacares dead, says the man holding a gun to its head.

A Friday-morning tweet suggests Rod Rosensteins job is in danger and the special prosecutors is, too.

The investigation into the presidents son-in-law expands.

Asking him to subject himself to oversight comes as easily to him as it would to Putin or Duterte or Mugabe.

Because investigators are probably going to want to see it.

Its not clear what prompted Rod Rosensteins statement.

Lawmakers took to the field just a day after the shooting of House whip Steve Scalise.

Lynne Patton doesnt have any experience in housing policy, but she does have a lot of experience working for the Trump family.

The most expensive House race in history just got weirder and more heated.

The vice-president will be represented by Richard Cullen, a former Virginia attorney general.

Trump begged moderate Republicans to vote for his health-care bill. Now, hes calling it mean and coldhearted and the House GOP is stunned.

Some commentators are taking the argument to some disturbing lengths.

Richard Burt, who lobbied for the interests of Russias state-owned oil company, recalls two dinners with Sessions last year.

Read more from the original source:
The Pentagon Is Reportedly Going to Send 4000 More US Troops to Afghanistan - New York Magazine

Blown Up by ISIS While Feeding the Poor in Afghanistan – New York Times


New York Times
Blown Up by ISIS While Feeding the Poor in Afghanistan
New York Times
The attack was the latest outrage attributed to Afghanistan's small but growing wing of the Islamic State, which claimed responsibility in a message on Telegram, a WhatsApp-like service, noting pointedly that the mosque was a Shiite one. While ...
Afghanistan: Deaths as suicide bombers hit Shia mosqueAljazeera.com
A handshake with Hekmatyar could break new ground in AfghanistanThe Indian Express
Afghanistan's Complex Terror Issues Demand an Intricate Peace SolutionThe National Interest Online
Times of India
all 126 news articles »

Follow this link:
Blown Up by ISIS While Feeding the Poor in Afghanistan - New York Times