Mediaboss Marketing

This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber?Try us and go ad-free for $1.Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.

If youre a political junkie whos been watching every twist and turn in the Democratic primary race since the day after the 2018 midterm results cameand if those in your social media circle are the same wayyouve probably grown weary of the drawn-out campaign and wish people would start voting already. But keep in mind that many less engaged voters are just now beginning to tune in. Historically, early-state primary polls have only begun to have predictive value after Thanksgiving. That make sense when you consider that most people dont pick out their Halloween costumes in May or June.

Surveys show that theres an unusual degree of interest in the 2020 election, so its possible that normies started paying close attention earlier than usual this cycle, but its also possible that this post-holiday week marks an unofficial start of the contest for the Democratic nomination.

With that in mind, here are a few things that a political junkie should keep in mind about how the primary race stands among the broader Democratic electorate.

National polls dont mean much this far out

The latestQuinnipiac pollgot a lot of attention this week. It found that former VEEP Joe Biden had retaken the lead from Sen. Elizabeth Warren. Many people think Bidens persistent lead in the national polling averages indicates that hes very likely to become the Democratic nominee. But while a candidate would prefer to be ahead than behind, keep in mind that inQuinnipiacs Oct 29, 2003 release, Wesley Clark led the field with 17 percent, trailed by Howard Dean and Joe Lieberman.Dick Gephardt followed and then came John Kerry, the eventual nominee, sitting in 5th place.

In theirDecember 10, 2003 poll, Dean had jumped ahead of Clark with the support of 22 percent of likely primary voters. Kerrys support, meanwhile, had dropped from 10 to 8 percent, and while he was still in 5th place, that survey found him tied with Al Sharpton.

They never will

Polling can tell you something about a candidates appeal, but it cant shed much light on whats under the hood of their campaignson the quality of their field organizations. When people start casting ballots, some will overperform expectations and others will disappoint. Momentum is a creation of the political press, but its effects are realresults in early states influence the media coverage and that in turns shapes the perceptions of voters in later states.

So its quite likely that the race will be reshaped as voting moves first from lily-white Iowa and quirky New Hampshire to South Carolina and Nevada, and then when February turns to March, when a huge chunk of delegates will be awarded on Super Tuesday.

And of course unforeseeable events could also restructure the campaign entirely. Howard Dean was flying high early in 2004 after he won the Iowa Caucuses. Adam Mordecai, a Dean staffer in Iowa, would later recall, We felt like we were invincible. He just kept winning poll after poll. He was on every magazine cover. But then Dean gave a speech with a rousing finish that would become known as the Dean Scream, whichfascinated our superficial political pressand ultimately created a path for John Kerry.

Its a very fluid race

According tothe latest Quinnipiac poll, only 11 percent of Democratic primary voters are undecided. But that figure is misleading, because another 57 percent of respondents said that while they are backing a candidate now, they might change their minds. This means that when you read, candidate X is at 35 percent in poll Y, over half of those supporters areleaningtowards that candidate at this point.

Thats as true of the establishment as it is rank-and-file voters

Whenever a prominent Democrat endorses or criticizes a candidate or a pundit with a big platform declares that a campaign is either surging or lagging, some people will conclude that its proof that the establishment is coalescing around one campaign or another. Sensitivities about Democratic elites putting their collective thumb on the scale linger from 2016.

But 2020 is a very different race. AsI wrote back in August, in 2016, Hillary Clinton racked up amomentouslead in endorsements from elected officials and prominent party activists. But so far in this cycle, most of those influential voices have waited to see how things will shake out. And the endorsements that have come in so farare distributed much more broadly among the candidates. (More generally, its better to think of the partys establishment as a cluster of power centers that come to a consensus at times, rather than as a monolithic creature.)

Ideological lanes are a pundits fallacy (with a caveat)

A lot of faulty analysis is based on the idea that moderate candidates are battling each other to win the moderate lane and progressives are similarly vying for a discrete group of consistently progressive voters. This ubiquitous narrative is contradicted byresearch undertaken by political scientistsand by voters second choices in the polls. Among Biden supporters in the Morning Consult poll, for example, 26 percent cite Bernie Sanders as their second choice, 19 percent name Elizabeth Warren and only 12 percent say its Pete Buttigieg, who is frequently said to be the moderate alternative to Biden.

On average, primary voters arent very ideological. They select candidates based on all sorts of criteriacharisma, experience, oratory skills, perceived electability, etc.

But theres a caveat: the fact that theres so much lane-based analysis may signal to voters that a candidate is or isnt aligned with their political identity. (Also,Nate Silver arguesthe lanes are real when you account for ideology along [with] other dimensions.)

Most voters arent persuaded by policy (with a big caveat)

Studies find that a small share of the electorate base their votes primarily on whether a candidate agrees with them on a few hot-button issues likeabortionandguns. And there issome evidencethat marijuana legalization boosts turnout among younger voters andmay discourage third-party votingwhen its embraced by a Democratic candidate.

Buta growing body of researchsuggests that most voters align themselves with a candidate (or a faction or party), and then work backwards to support that candidates policy proposals.

But here, again, we have to acknowledge that the way the media covers an issue also shapes how voters perceive it, and possibly how they think about candidates who support or oppose it. (I will write more about this issue soon in relation to Medicare for All.)

Most polling of demographic subgroups is misleading

You might hear that Mayor Pete Buttigieg is polling at zero percent with African-Americans, for example, or that voters over age 65 in South Carolina hold this or that opinion. Keep in mind that in most polls, these results are based on small sub-samples from a larger survey and as a result, tend to have a lot of room for error.

Speaking of Buttigieg

Last month, when Pete Buttigieg was in fourth place in New Hampshire,I arguedthat despite enjoying a flurry of favorable media coverage, the South Bend, Indiana mayor had not yet broken into the top tier of candidates. Now that hes leading in both Iowa and New Hampshire, its probably safe to say that he has.

But Buttigieg still differs from the other top candidates in one important way: According toMorning Consult, more than a third of Democratic primary voters have either never heard of the guy (18 percent) or dont yet know enough about him to have formed an opinion (18 percent).

That means he has room to grow, but it also means that as more voters get to know him better he could prove to be a flash in the pan. How he does in the first two contests relative to his polling, and the results of South Carolina and Nevadathe other, more diverse February stateswill probably go further toward determining which how his candidacy proceeds than it might with a more established figure.

Electability is only ever clear in hindsight

Back in June,I arguedthat 2020 will be first and foremost a battle over Donald Trump and the political movement he has inspired. Polls show that both parties basesare fired up to a degree thats unprecedentedin the modern era.

The Democratic coalition is bigger, and Republicans know that.So while the quality of the Dems nominee matters at least at the margins, the outcome will probably come down to whether the backlash against Trump that led to Democratic wins in the off-year elections of 2017, 2018 and 2019 can overcome an enormous amount of voter suppression, targeted disinformation and other measures to curb turnout among Trumps opposition.

then let us make a small request. Like you, we here at Raw Story believe in the power of progressive journalism. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnstons DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. Weve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. Weve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and legal efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. And unlike other news outlets, weve decided to make our original content free. But we need your support to do what we do.

Raw Story is independent. You wont find mainstream media bias here. Unhinged from billionaires and corporate overlords, we fight to ensure no one is forgotten.

We need your support to deepen our investigative reporting. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us in the future. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click to donate by check.

then let us make a small request. Like you, we here at Raw Story believe in the power of progressive journalism and were investing in investigative reporting as other publications give it the ax. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnstons DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. Weve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. Weve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. We need your support to do what we do.

Raw Story is independent. You wont find mainstream media bias here. Unhinged from corporate overlords, we fight to ensure no one is forgotten.

We need your support to keep producing quality journalism and deepen our investigative reporting. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us in the future. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber?Try us and go ad-free for $1.Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.

Go here to read the rest:
Here are 9 things you absolutely need to know about the 2020 Democratic primary race - Raw Story