Mediaboss Marketing

KABUL, Afghanistan Weaving through theclogged streets of Kabul, only half are paved. The rest are tracksin the hardened dirt. Unfinished buildings tower over the endless raw meat stands, barefoot men huddle in a gutter sharing tea while poorwomen beg from behind theirburkas andchildren swarm car windows pleading for spare change.

There is an unspoken sense that anything, at any time, can go wrong.

"There is no safe place to go anymore. When a person comes out of their house, you cannot assume that he or she will come home," MohammadSayedRahimi, founder of private security firm Kabul Balkh Safety&Security, told Fox News. "The situation now is as fearful as it was under the Taliban rule of the '90s."

TheSpecial Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) reportedlastweek that armed clashes and security incidents nationwide have reached "new heights" and caused an uptick in civilian deaths. The security incidents throughout last year and the first quarter of this year are also at their highest level sinceUnited Nations documentation began in 2007.

President Trump is considering a proposed Pentagon plan for the embattled country, which -- if implemented -- is likely to entail the deployment of at least 3,000 more American military personnel.

"More U.S.troops would be much better for the security of the country, but the U.S.needs to have a clear, long-term strategy toward Afghanistan," saidGen.JawidKohistani, a former official at Afghanistan's National DirectorateofSecurity (NDS) and leading security analyst."So far, it has all been temporary. And that isn't working."

Essa Attei (Hollie McKay/Fox News)

The quick U.S. ousting of theradical Islamic fundamentalistTaliban regimein 2001 and the ensuing almost 16-year peace in their country doesn't go unappreciated by most Afghans,who view America and NATO asloyal partnersin their fight against terrorism.

"We welcome more troops; NATO has been our best friend," said EssaAttei, a driver for the late PresidentBurhanuddin Rabbani, who reigned from 1992 to 1996before the Taliban took over.

AbdulKhaliqKandahari, the former governor of the Arghandab district of Kandahar province and current adviser to Dr. AbdullahAbdullah-- the chief executive of Afghanistan -- survived an assassination attempt in 2014, eight bulletstearing intohis stomach. He credits the U.S.for saving his life with emergency surgery atBagramAir Base.

"The U.S.has supported us since we fought against the Soviet invaders, and after 2001,and we are very grateful," he enthused. "Without American support, we cannot yet stand on our own legs. This takes time. Security and infrastructure is most important."

The decades of conflict, invasion and extremist rule led the Afghanpeople to live defensively, but they do not accept constant conflict as normal -- knowing all too well that a better life is not impossible.

"We are at war," Col. Abdul Sami, who works in Kabul securing depots and storage facilities for the Ministry of Defense, said."We don'thaveany problems in this country -- but this."

Women at an outdoor market in Kabul (Hollie McKay/Fox News)

For some, a continued or even expanded American presence could prove either friendly or fatal for their country. Today's deterioratingsecurity situation also has created a deep skepticism as to what the true motives of the United States might be.

"The main purpose of America coming in was to defeat terrorism, and now it is not only worse but multiplying," one high-ranking political official lamented. "So is the plan just to use our country as a testing ground for bombs?"

Last month's droppingofa MOAB bombmight have killedsome terrorists, but it also meantbombing their country again. When locals seea Western face, theyoftenask why America provides massive sums ofaid and military fundingto Pakistan to fight terrorism,yet that neighboring nation is seenas theNo. 1 sourceof cross-border terrorism in Afghanistan. In fact,the Afghanistan-Pakistan region has the highest concentration ofterrorist groups in the world.Pakistan provides a safe haven and even passports formany ofthose terrorists, including the Taliban, yet the U.S. government provides funding to Pakistan.Afghansfrequently ask,how does this make sense to America?

Overall,an increasedU.S.involvement is generally desired by the Afghan people, if only to provide a security blanket. Most also acknowledge that it is only something of aBand-Aid slapped on a bullet wound.More of the same, and a military approach alone, won't bring them long-term peace.

An outdoor market in Kabul (Hollie McKay/Fox News)

And the sword is double-edged: The increased strength ofthe insurgency has forced the Afghan government to spend more on defenseand less on infrastructure, education andquality-of-life initiatives for its people.

Furthermore, Afghans across the board are fed upwiththe corruption that has plagued their governmentand their military since theU.S.invasion in 2001. EvenU.S.military officials havestated that,as published inSIGARsApril 30, 2017, Quarterly Report to Congress, corruption remains the No. 1 obstacle to Afghanarmedforces development. And yet, the U.S. continues to dedicate more than 60 percent of itson-budgetassistancefor Afghanistanto Afghanmilitaryneeds-- even though thetroopsthemselves seem not to be reaping the benefits of thosebillionsof dollars.

The shockingly high casualty rate of Afghangovernmentforces -- estimated to be around 100 a day -- is largely attributed to the perception thatcommanding officerranks are awarded not on performance, but on family connectionsand bribes. Moreover, the average soldier earns less than $50 a week -- barely enough to feedhimself,let alone a family.This has led to high defection rates andpoormorale. Who wantsto fight for a country where onlyelite andtribally-affiliated pockets are lined?

"The people who fight for us don't get good clothes, good foodoreven enough ammo,"Rahimisaid. "Sending thousands more U.S.troops isn't going to make the security situation better. The corruptionproblem must be solvedfirst."

However, others insist that there are many reasons to be optimistic about the future of Afghanistan.Many say that the country ison the right trajectory as it is, and that thepassageof time will stamp out government corruption and tribal contentions, and bring with it stabilityand prosperity. But an American stake in the game is vital.

Marshal Azizi at an outdoor shop (Hollie McKay/Fox News)

MarshalAzizi, who just turned 17, has spent almost his entire life under U.S.military protection and fears anything different.

"It will be a big threat for us if America leaves completely," he said. "I want to go to university and then join the Army and fight for my country. And fight alongside America."

According to Afghan businessmanSaedIsmailAmiri, there are many elements bringing instability to Afghanistan. But the upcoming generation has a far more open-minded, fiscally-savvy view of their country that will soon overtake the age-old tribal and ethnic hostilities that have held Afghanistan back from progress.

"We see hope. The number of educated people is increasing, young people are on social media,changehas startedto happen. But we still need support,"Amirisaid. "We need America to not leave us alone. This country will collapsein 30 daysif you do."

And, he stressed, should America choose to drawdownthe best thing is to keep that part of the foreign policy quiet.

"That was the biggest mistake Obama made, giving a departure date to the Taliban,"Amiriadded. "They just waited and now they are controlling 40 percent of the country."

Hollie McKay has been a FoxNews.com staff reporter since 2007. She has reported extensively from the Middle East on the rise and fall of terrorist groups such as ISIS in Iraq. Follow her on twitter at @holliesmckay

Original post:
Inside Afghanistan: Are more US troops what Afghans want? - Fox News