Mediaboss Marketing

Michael Graham| InsideSources

Biden on climate change: We've 'waited too long'

President Biden signed executive actions tied to combating climate change, including elevating climate change as a national security concern.

Staff Video, USA TODAY

In 2016, Hillary Clinton made a gaffe that might have cost her the White House.

She said at an Ohio campaign stop, We're going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business.

Months later, Clinton would lose Pennsylvania, Michiganand Wisconsin to Donald Trumpand gave Republicans the right to call themselves the party of the working class.

Biden turned those states blue again in 2020, as energy development took a back seat to the hyper-manic news coverage that we have all accepted as the new normal: Russia, COVID, riots, election fraud, impeachments, seditionand who knows what gets added to the list tomorrow?

But while Democrats are branding Biden as a return to the middle, he may be even more extreme on American energy development than either Clinton or his former boss, Barack Obama. In his first week in office, he killed the Keystone XL pipeline and thousands of energy-sector jobs along with it.

More: Inside look: What Houma-Thibodaux's largest industry groups are saying and doing about Biden's new oil restrictions

His energy czar, former Massachusetts John Kerry, was widely criticized for telling oil rig workers and energy-sector pipe fitters they can just get new jobs installing solar panels,a comment that to some seemed to echo Hillary's infamous gaffe.

Chewing over that moment in her book "What Happened,"Clinton said she was only trying to explain that Americas energy renaissance would render coal obsolete, not that she wanted to push coal miners out of a job.

"Changes in mining technology, competition from lower-sulfur Wyoming coal, and cheaper and cleaner natural gas and renewable energy, and a drop in the global demand for coal"would mean we just didnt need coal as much, she wrote. In her book, at least, Clinton seemed content to let the market evolve.

Obama took a few significant steps to slow coals roll. He imposed rules requiring coal plants to do more to filter toxic materials from wastewater. And at the very end of his last term, Obama imposed a three-year delay to new coal leases on federal land a significant move given that nearly half of all U.S.-produced coal comes from federally managed land.

Now Biden has doubled down, ordering a stop to oil and gas leasing on public lands and in public waters, including the Gulf of Mexico.

More: Joe Biden's oil restrictions: Right intent, wrong approach | Our Opinion

As a candidate, Biden promised no new oil and gas development on federal lands or federally controlled waters. Gone is the soft spot for Americas cleaner energy boom Biden said in his second debate with Trump that he would actively transition away from the oil industry altogether.

If Biden backs up those words with action, it might be much more noticeable than Obamas attempts to end the coal industry, an effort quickly reversed by Trump. Fossil fuels are still used to generate nearly two-thirds of Americas electricity, and the biggest source is natural gas. About a quarter of U.S. oil production comes from federal lands and waters. Ending new development could force the U.S. to scramble for supply at some point in the future.

Some companies have reacted to the threat by promising toreduce their emissions, perhaps as a way of bargaining for leniency with Biden. But either way, consumers could start feeling the pinch.

And its not clear Bidens team will be in the mood to bargain. He nominated Rep. Deb Haaland, D-N.M., to be his secretary of the interior. Environmentalists have high hopes for Haaland, and while she has not been specific, it seems clear shes aiming to please them.

Ill be fierce for all of us, our planet, and all of our protected land, Haaland tweeted after Biden announced he wants her on his team.

For the Environmental Protection Agency, Biden has chosen North Carolina's top regulator, Michael Regan. Heres how theWashington Postdescribed him:

Regan forged a multibillion-dollar settlement over cleanups of coal waste with Duke Energy, established an environmental justice advisory board, and reached across the political divide to work with the states Republican legislature. In another high-profile case, the state ordered the chemical company Chemours to virtually eliminate a group of man-made chemicals from seeping into the Cape Fear River.

Ironically, putting limits on oil and gas could end up helping coal, especially if Bidens actions make natural gas a little less competitive. But many believe coal is facing structural problems, such as decreased demand from China, that are beating down the industry as much as any regulation could.

Energy companies, at least, seem to notice the box canyon theyre entering with the Biden administration. In the last few weeks, they have been securing drilling permits that they hope will let them weather what promises to be a storm of new regulatory hurdles to energy development, backed by what may be the most liberal, environmentally-minded government America has ever seen.

-- Michael Graham is political editor at InsideSources. You can reach him atmichael@insidesources.com.

See the article here:
Opinion: Is Biden repeating the Hillary gaffe on energy policy? - Houma Courier

Rush Limbaugh gestures after being given the Presidential Medal of Freedom by first lady Melania Trump. Moments earlier, in a surprise, President Donald Trump announced the award during his State of the Union address on Feb. 4, 2020.

Mandel Ngan | AFP | Getty Images

Rush Limbaugh, the self-proclaimed "Doctor of Democracy" who led the conservative media revolution by bashing "feminazis," "environmentalist wackos," "commie libs" and prominent Black people especially former President Barack Obama, died Wednesday. He was 70.

His wife announced his death on his radio show.

"I know that I am most certainly not the Limbaugh that you tuned in to listen to today," Kathryn Limbaugh said. "I, like you, very much wish Rush was behind this golden microphone right now, welcoming you to another exceptional three hours of broadcasting. ... It is with profound sadness I must share with you directly that our beloved Rush, my wonderful husband, passed away this morning due to complications from lung cancer."

Former President Donald Trump told Fox News on Wednesday he had spoken with Limbaugh three or four days earlier. "He was fighting to the very end," Trump said in his first public comments since he left office last month. "He is a legend. He really is."

Another former president, George W. Bush, also lamented Limbaugh's death. "While he was brash, at times controversial, and always opinionated, he spoke his mind as a voice for millions of Americans and approached each day with gusto," Bush said in a statement. "Rush Limbaugh was an indomitable spirit with a big heart, and he will be missed."

White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki said President Joe Biden's "condolences go out to the family and friends."

A day after the deadly January riot by a Trumpist mob in a bid to overturn Democrat Biden's victory in the November election, Limbaugh likened the invaders of the U.S. Capitol to the Revolutionary War patriots.

"There's a lot of people calling for the end of violence," Limbaugh said on his radio program. "There's a lot of conservatives, social media, who say that any violence or aggression at all is unacceptable. Regardless of the circumstances. I'm glad Sam Adams, Thomas Paine, the actual tea party guys, the men at Lexington and Concord didn't feel that way."

In December, he said conservative states were "trending toward secession."

As his cancer progressed, Limbaugh went off the air on Feb. 2, his mic was manned by substitutes starting one week before Trump's second impeachment trial began.

But there was no mistaking his viewpoint. "You didn't win this thing fair and square, and we are not just going to be docile like we've been in the past and go away and wait 'til the next the election," he told listeners six weeks after Biden won the election.

The acerbic radio host, who used satirical invective to attract and delight millions of fans and offend and enrage millions of others, announced in February 2020 he had been diagnosed with advanced lung cancer. A day later, then-President Trump awarded him the Presidential Medal of Freedom in a surprise announcement during the State of the Union speech.

"This is not good news," Trump said at the time, referring to the diagnosis. "But what is good news is that he is the greatest fighter and winner that you will ever meet. Rush Limbaugh: Thank you for your decades of tireless devotion to our country."

In October, Limbaugh told his listeners his condition was heading in the wrong direction.

"It's tough to realize that the days where I do not think I'm under a death sentence are over," Limbaugh said. "Now, we all are, is the point. We all know that we're going to die at some point, but when you have a terminal disease diagnosis that has a time frame to it, then that puts a different psychological and even physical awareness to it."

Days before Limbaugh's update, he hosted a "radio rally" for Trump,with audio of a crowd chanting, "We love you," and the president speaking for much of the two-hour event during his recovery from Covid-19.

Limbaugh was key to the 1994 Republican takeover of Congress, which swept Rep. Newt Gingrich into the House speakership and ultimately led to the impeachment of President Bill Clinton.

"Rush Limbaugh was the innovator who spoke for the Americans ignored and disrespected by the elites," Trump lawyer Mayor Rudy Giuliani said in a tweet after Limbaugh announced his cancer diagnosis.

Rush Hudson Limbaugh III was born Jan. 12, 1951, in Cape Girardeau, Missouri. His father and grandfather were lawyers. The grandfather was given the name Rush to honor a relative, Edna Rush.

Limbaugh began his broadcast career in 1971 as a 20-year-old Top 40 DJ in western Pennsylvania after dropping out of Southeast Missouri State University. Following a series of subsequent jobs, including five years with Major League Baseball's Kansas City Royals, he eventually landed a talk show at KFBK in Sacramento, California, in 1984. He replaced Morton Downey Jr., who resigned after jokingly using a racist term about a city councilman of Chinese descent.

At the time, daytime talk radio was largely local. Four years later, in 1988, Limbaugh sprang to national prominence after he joined WABC-AM in New York, lured by network executive Edward F. McLaughlin. Within two years, more than 5 million people were listening to "The Rush Limbaugh Show" broadcast three hours a day, five days a week on nearly 300 stations, media critic Lewis Grossberger wrote in The New York Times Magazine in late 1990.

Rush Limbaugh in his radio studio in 1995.

Mark Peterson | Corbis | Getty Images

By the 20th anniversary of the show, he signed an eight-year, $400 million contract renewal with iHeartMedia's Premiere Radio Networks. At the time, the show was aired on nearly 600 local stations. In 2016, he signed a new contract for an undisclosed amount for "four more years," he announced on the air.

"His subject is politics. His stance: conservative. His persona: comic blowhard. His style: a schizoid spritz, bouncing between earnest lecturer and political vaudevillian," Grossberg wrote in the 1990 Times magazine piece.

Limbaugh's shtick on what he termed his EIB (Excellence in Broadcasting) Network may have been satire to millions, but countless others considered him to be a misogynistic, racist hatemonger who helped fuel the nation's polarization into overdrive that paved the way for Trump's 2016 election victory.

Just before starting on WABC, he came up with "Rush's First 35 Undeniable Truths of Life." Topping the list was "The greatest threat to humanity lies in the nuclear arsenal of the USSR." At the bottom was "You should thank God for making you an American; and instead of feeling guilty about it, help spread our ideas worldwide." In between included: (#7) "There is only one way to get rid of nuclear weapons use them"; (#21) "Abortion is wrong"; (#25) "Evolution cannot explain Creation"; and (#31) "To more and more people, a victorious U.S. is a sinful U.S."

Here's a sampling of some other verbal cudgels Limbaugh wielded in his warfare against political correctness.

Undeniable Truth of Life #24, which he repeated numerous times over the years, bashed what he called "feminazis": "Feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society."

While working as an ESPN commentator in 2003, he called Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb overrated and went on to say: "I think what we've had here is a little social concern in the NFL. The media has been very desirous that a Black quarterback do well. There is a little hope invested in McNabb, and he got a lot of credit for the performance of this team that he didn't deserve. The defense carried this team." Limbaugh resigned from ESPN in the ensuing uproar.

In 2007 while discussing the antics of National Football League players' dancing in the end zone after a touchdown, Limbaugh referred to Los Angeles' notorious street gangs: "Let me put it to you this way. The NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it."

In March 2018, he discussed a scientific study that warned about environmental dangers from Easter chocolates: "Now from an environmentalist wacko group at the University of Manchester in England warning everybody: Beware the chocolate Easter bunny, and those foil-wrapped chocolate eggs. Both could be 'bad for the environment,' warns a new study, which says that such confections can damage the environment."

Four days before Obama's first inauguration on Jan. 20, 2009, Limbaugh spoke about being asked to write 400 words on his hope for the Obama presidency. "I disagree fervently with the people on our side of the aisle who have caved and who say, 'Well, I hope he succeeds.' ... OK, I'll send you a response, but I don't need 400 words, I need four: 'I hope he fails.'"

During the 2016 election campaign, Limbaugh took a swat at a proposal by Hillary Clinton to make public colleges free for children whose families earned less than $125,000 a year: "The first rule of adulthood is that there is no 'free' stuff. Somebody has to pay your commie-lib professors to spew all this anti-capitalist, anti-American BS that passes for education these days."

In the midst of the coronavirus crisis in March 2020, he likened the outbreak to the common cold and blamed the media for fanning a panic. "This coronavirus? All of this panic is just not warranted," he said on the air. "They're not uncommon. Coronaviruses are respiratory cold and flu viruses. There is nothing about this except where it came from and the itinerant media panic. ... This is on the way to wiping out the U.S. economy, and it's going to be more than just Donald Trump and his reelection chances that get hurt if that's what happens here. ... Nothing like wiping out the entire U.S. economy with a biothreat from China, is there?"

Years before his cancer diagnosis, Limbaugh had other health issues. He had developed hearing problems and underwent Cochlear implant surgery in 2001. Two years later, he developed an addiction to prescription painkillers that he said he started using after botched surgery on his back. Limbaugh eventually was charged with shopping for doctors to prescribe medication for his addiction. He pleaded innocent and later entered a deal in which prosecutors dropped the charges in return for Limbaugh paying $30,000 to cover the cost of the investigation and undergoing therapy.

Limbaugh was married four times, most recently to Kathryn Rogers on June 5, 2010, with Elton John providing entertainment. The ceremony for Limbaugh's third marriage, to Marta Fitzgerald, a former aerobics instructor whom he met online, was performed on May 27, 1994, by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas at Thomas' home in northern Virginia. They divorced 10 years later. His previous marriages also ended in divorce.

Limbaugh was actively involved in charitable works. His EIB Cure-a-thon raised about $50 million for the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society over 26 years until the annual event ended in 2016, according to Andrea Greif, a spokeswoman for the organization. He also raised money for and served on the board of the Marine CorpsLaw Enforcement Foundation.

A cigar smoker, Limbaugh appeared on the cover of the magazine Cigar Aficionado in 1994. Five years before he announced he had lung cancer, he denied a connection between secondhand smoke and cancer.

"That is a myth. That has been disproven at the World Health Organization and the report was suppressed. There is no fatality whatsoever. There's no[t] even major sickness component associated with secondhand smoke. It may irritate you, and you may not like it, but it will not make you sick, and it will not kill you," he said on his show. "Firsthand smoke takes 50 years to kill people, if it does. Not everybody that smokes gets cancer. Now, it's true that everybody who smokes dies, but so does everyone who eats carrots."

In his October 2020 update of his condition, he told listeners: "From the moment you get the diagnosis, there's a part of you every day, OK, that's it,life's over, you just don't know when. ... So, during theperiod of timeafter the diagnosis, you do what you can to prolong life, do what you can to prolong a happy life."

Continue reading here:
Rush Limbaugh, the incendiary radio talk show host, dies at age 70 - CNBC

Memphis, TN, Feb. 17, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The National Civil Rights Museum is hosting A Conversation with Ruby Bridges and Chelsea Clinton, a virtual dialogue between two education advocates and authors on the intersection of race, class, gender and generations. The one-hour virtual event on February 25 is a sharing of personal stories, struggle, Southern roots and congruent pathways that have brought them where they are today.

The program is an interracial, intergenerational conversation between two women whose childhoods were spent in the public eye. Freedom Award honoree Ruby Bridges and Chelsea Clinton talk about the mutual respect for the work each has done for education and equal rights. They discuss their lives, the importance of the Civil Rights Movement and its legacy as well as the significance of the National Civil Rights Museum.

Bridges and Clinton also commemorate the 60th anniversary of Bridges-Halls integration of William B. Frantz Elementary School in New Orleans, LA on November 14, 1960. Before this conversation, the two had never met.

We are honored that we could host this powerful conversation between two education advocates, said Dr. Noelle Trent, the museums Director of Interpretation, Collections and Education. This unique conversation, presents both women in a stunning new light as they bring forth revelations about their lives and ongoing advocacy work.

Ruby Bridges-Hall became a civil rights activist at the age of six when she was the first African American to integrate a school in the South. In 1960, Bridges-Hall was escorted to her new school by federal marshals to protect her from the angry white mob that protested daily outside the school. White parents refused to let their children attend school as long as she was there, and white teachers refused to teach her, except one. For the entire year, Bridges-Hall was taught in a classroom alone. In midst of threats and scolding, Bridges-Hall was a little soldier according to the U.S marshals who protected her.

Still an activist, Bridges-Hall is the founder of the Ruby Bridges Foundation, promoting the values of tolerance, respect, and appreciation of all differences. Through education and inspiration, the foundation seeks to end racism and prejudice. The Museum honored Bridges-Hall as one of its 2015 Freedom Award recipients. She also received the Presidential Citizens Medal of Honor from President Clinton in 2011. Her book, Through My Eyes, won the Carter G. Woodson Book Award in 2000. President Obama invited Bridges-Hall to the White House to view the Norman Rockwell painting, The Problem We All Live With, which displayed outside the Oval Office in 2011. The artwork depicted her as a child being escorted by U.S. marshals to school. She donated a framed print to the National Civil Rights Museum in 2016 that is now in the museums Brown v. Board exhibition.

As vice chair of the Clinton Foundation, Chelsea Clinton works alongside the Foundations leadership and partners to help create economic opportunity, improve public health and inspire civic engagement and service across the United States and around the world. In particular, Clinton focuses on promoting early brain and language development through the Too Small to Fail initiative and empowering female entrepreneurs and women-led businesses around the world through initiatives like the Caribbean-focused Women in Renewable Energy (WIRE) Network. She also serves on the boards of the Clinton Health Access Initiative and the Alliance for a Healthier Generation.

In addition to her Foundation work, Clinton also teaches at Columbia Universitys Mailman School of Public Health and has written several books for young readers, including the #1New York Times bestsellingShe Persisted: 13 American Women Who Changed the Worldin which she features Bridges-Hall. She is also the co-author ofThe Book of Gutsy WomenandGrandmas Gardenswith her mom Hillary Clinton.

The virtual event on Thursday, February 25, begins at 6:00pm Central. Made possible with the support of International Paper, the event is free, however registration is required for platform access. For information and to register, visit the museums website.

About the National Civil Rights Museum

The NATIONAL CIVIL RIGHTS MUSEUM, located at the historic Lorraine Motel where civil rights leader Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated, gives a comprehensive overview of the American Civil Rights Movement from slavery to the present. Since the Museum opened in 1991, millions of visitors from around the world have come, including more than 90,000 students annually. The Museum is steadfast in its mission to chronicle the American civil rights movement and tell the story of the ongoing struggle for human rights. It educates and serves as a catalyst to inspire action to create positive social change. A Smithsonian Affiliate and an internationally acclaimed cultural institution, the Museum is recognized as a 2019 National Medal Award recipient by the Institute of Museums and Library Services (IMLS), the top national honor for museums and libraries. It is a TripAdvisor Travelers Choice Top 5% U.S. Museum, USA Today's Top 10 Best American Iconic Attractions; Top 10 Best Historical Spots in the U.S. by TLC's Family Travel; Must See by the Age of 15 by Budget Travel and Kids; Top 10 American Treasures by USA Today; and Best Memphis Attraction by The Commercial Appeal and the Memphis Business Journal.

About Smithsonian Affiliations

Established in 1996, Smithsonian Affiliations is a national outreach program that develops long-term collaborative partnerships with museums and educational and cultural organizations to enrich communities with Smithsonian resources. The long-term goal of Smithsonian Affiliations is to facilitate a two-way relationship among the Affiliate organizations and the Smithsonian Institution to increase discovery and inspire lifelong learning in communities across America. More information about the Smithsonian Affiliations program and Affiliate activity is available at http://www.affiliations.si.edu.

Originally posted here:
National Civil Rights Museum Hosts 'A Conversation with Ruby Bridges and Chelsea Clinton' - GlobeNewswire

In 2010, the last time Democrats controlled both houses of Congress and the presidency, they used the opportunity to pass sweeping health care reform legislation known as the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare.

But that legislative push was hardly easy. It divided many Democrats, and it ultimately came with an electoral price. In the midterm elections that year, Republicans won their largest share of seats in the House of Representatives since the 1940s, while Democrats who backed the ACA saw their vote share drop by an extraordinary 8.5 percentage points on average.

Now, though, Democrats are back in the drivers seat, with unified control of the federal government thanks to their Senate wins in Georgia. So, what lessons from their 2010 signature accomplishment should they apply to their efforts to pass legislation in 2021, whether its on COVID-19 or climate change?

As a political science professor studying public perceptions of the ACA, I see two core lessons for Democrats to keep in mind. First, to stop high-profile laws from becoming unpopular, it helps to keep them simple. And the ACA was anything but: It sought to increase access to health insurance through a complex patchwork of regulations and other policies, which included creating new health insurance exchanges, expanding Medicaid, adding new rules to guarantee insurance access regardless of preexisting conditions, and mandating that all Americans obtain health insurance.

Second, when the public evaluates a complex, multifaceted policy, like the ACA, there is a tendency to focus on its least popular parts. Most of the ACAs major provisions were actually pretty popular. In a January 2010 Kaiser Family Foundation poll, for instance, 67 percent of respondents said that they were more likely to support health care legislation that created insurance exchanges, while 62 percent said the same about expanding Medicaid. Yet, Obamacare as a whole was viewed unfavorably from 2011 until 2017. That was, in large part, due to one unpopular provision in the law: the individual mandate. In that same 2010 KFF poll, 62 percent said that the health insurance mandate made them less likely to support the bill. And for millions of Americans, the ACA became synonymous with the individual mandate.

The complexity of the ACA also masked its impact to a degree. For instance, the ACAs exchanges should have fostered support for the law after all, they enabled millions of Americans to get insurance, often with subsidies averaging thousands of dollars. Yet, as Cornell Universitys Will Hobbs and I find in our preprint, the 2014 rollout of the exchanges did not increase support for the ACA. In part, thats because the exchanges relied on private insurers, and so the governments role in facilitating the insurance was obscured. The exchanges were also designed to be bolstered by the individual mandate, but given the mandates unpopularity, it provoked a demonstrable backlash. We found, too, that exchange customers felt more negative toward the ACA if local premiums spiked. Once again, losses loomed larger than gains.

Not all parts of the law were unsuccessful, though. Take the ACAs expansion of Medicaid. It extended coverage to most low-income adults, including adults without children, and is a key source of support for the ACA. In fact, in a 2019 article I co-authored with then-University of Pennsylvania researcher Kalind Parish, we found that poorer residents in states where Medicaid had been expanded were notably more supportive of the ACA after its implementation. Thats evidence that tangible, positive experiences with the law had an effect, too.

Policy design clearly plays a role in a laws popularity. And policies that impose clear costs or obscure benefits are likely to be less popular, as we saw with the ACA. That said, there is one more key lesson here: Its really hard for politicians to control the messaging of any piece of legislation. According to research I conducted for a 2018 article, the messaging that the two parties used in the initial debates around the ACA did little to influence public opinion, or even the words Americans used to explain their attitudes toward the ACA. The rhetoric used by politicians remember former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palins infamous Facebook post suggesting that the ACA would create death panels corresponded very little with the language used by Americans when talking about the ACA. This echoes other research that has also found little evidence of opinions shifting in response to messaging. This holds true even among groups for whom the messaging is targeted (like older Americans). Rather, the key to successful legislation seems to hinge on how the policy is designed, not how it is discussed.

And that makes some sense, as the central goal of legislating is to shape policy, not public opinion. But this is not to say the two arent closely related. After all, the ACAs initial unpopularity undermined the Democrats ability to defend it, leaving the law politically vulnerable for years. It also had very real electoral consequences when Democrats lost the House in 2010. So, as the Democratic Congress gets ready to pass its agenda, it may be wise to internalize these lessons from the ACA to avoid the same pitfalls.

See the original post here:
The Democrats Have An Ambitious Agenda. Heres What They Should Learn From Obamacare. - FiveThirtyEight

After weeks of deliberations, congressional Democrats and the White House are close to finalizing an immigration overhaul bill that would reshape U.S. immigration laws and allow millions of immigrants living in the country without authorization to obtain legal status, according to a 66-page section by section summary of the legislation obtained by CBS News.

The proposal, which sources said could be officially unveiled as early as Thursday, would create a two-tier legalization program which would automatically make farmworkers, Temporary Protected Status (TPS) holders and undocumented immigrants who came to the U.S. as children eligible for green cards, according to the draft text. After three years, they could apply to become U.S. citizens.

All other eligible unauthorized immigrants would be able to request temporary deportation relief and work permits while being placed on an eight-year pathway towards U.S. citizenship. Petitioners would all need to undergo background and national security checks, as well as file taxes and pay application fees.

According to the draft text shared with congressional staff, the plan would not benefit new arrivals, as all prospective applicants would need to prove they were in the U.S. before January 1, 2021. The secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) would be allowed to issue humanitarian waivers to this requirement for immigrants deported during the Trump administration as long as they prove they lived in the U.S. for at least three years before their deportation.

California Congresswoman Linda Snchez and New Jersey Senator Bob Menendez, two Democrats with past experience crafting immigration policy, will introduce the proposal in the House and Senate, respectively.

The bill, based on parameters unveiled by the Biden administration last month, is expected to be championed by the White House as one of President Biden's domestic policy priorities during his first year in office. However, the sweeping proposal will need to garner unanimous Democratic support and at least 10 Republican votes in the Senate under current Senate rules a threshold that has previously doomed other immigration reform plans.

In addition to the legalization provisions, the bill would scrap Clinton-era sanctions that bar undocumented immigrants who leave the U.S. from reentering the country for three or 10 years, as well as curb the president's power to issue categorical bans on groups of immigrants. It would also substitute all references to "alien" in immigration laws with the term "noncitizen."

Another centerpiece of the bill is an expansion of legal immigration. The plan would raise the current per-country caps for family and employment-based immigrant visas and reassign unused visas. It would render spouses and children of green card holders "immediate family members," exempting them from the per-country caps.

The bill would increase the annual allocation of employment-based visas from 140,000 to 170,000, as well as the yearly ceiling for diversity visas from 55,000 to 80,000. An additional 10,000 visas would be reserved for a pilot program designed for immigrants who will contribute to the economic development of local communities.

The plan would give the Biden administration $1 billion annually between 2022 and 2025 to finance efforts to reduce the violence, poverty, crime and corruption that fuel U.S.-bound migration from Central America. It would also require the establishment of processing centers in the region where Central Americans, including at-risk children, could apply for parole or refugee status to come to the U.S. legally.

Other provisions ask DHS to implement "smart" border security measures and allocate funds to expand the infrastructure that ports of entry have to process asylum applicants and intercept illicit drugs. The department would be required to issue new guidelines governing the care and processing of migrant children.

The plan would also allocate 30,000 visas for victims of serious crimes who assist law enforcement; eliminate the current 1-year deadline asylum-seekers have to apply for U.S. refuge; and instruct DHS to expand alternatives to detention for migrants in deportation proceedings, particularly families with children.

The rest is here:
Democrats close to finalizing Biden-backed immigration overhaul bill - CBS News