Archive for November, 2020

Letter to the editor: Democrats started division – TribLIVE

Our commenting has been temporarily disabled.

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to ourTerms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sentvia e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

Read the original here:
Letter to the editor: Democrats started division - TribLIVE

House Democrats to renew effort to obtain Trump’s tax returns next year | TheHill – The Hill

House Democrats are planning to renew their efforts to obtain President TrumpDonald John TrumpBiden has spoken with some GOP senators, chief of staff says Trump told advisers he could announce 2024 bid shortly after certification of Biden win: report Ivy League cancels winter sports amid US COVID-19 pandemic surge MORE's federal tax returns after he leaves office next year.

Based on the principle of the issue, not the politics of it, yes, you have to stay with the case," House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard NealRichard Edmund NealOn The Money: Biden, Democratic leaders push for lame-duck coronavirus deal | Business groups shudder at Sanders as Labor secretary | Congress could pass retirement bill as soon as this year Top Democrat: Congress could pass retirement bill as soon as this year Momentum grows for bipartisan retirement bill in divided Congress MORE (D-Mass.) told The Wall Street Journal this week.

Rep. Bill PascrellWilliam (Bill) James PascrellOffice of Special Counsel investigating use of White House for Trump campaign 'war room' Democrats express concerns about IRS readiness for next year's filing season Obama hits trail to help Biden, protect legacy MORE (D-N.J.), a senior Ways and Means Committee member who has been a leading advocate for obtaining Trump's tax returns, told the Journal that lawmakers "have an obligation to examine this and follow the money."

In April 2019, Neal requested Trump's personal and business tax returns from 2013 through 2018 from the IRS. He cited a provision in the federal tax code that states that the Treasury secretary "shall furnish" tax returns requested by the chairpeople of Congress's tax committees.

Neal has said that the Ways and Means Committee wants Trump's tax returns because the panel is conducting oversight and considering legislative proposals relating to how the IRS enforces tax laws against presidents.

The Trump administration rejected Neal's request and subsequent subpoenas, arguing that House Democrats lack a legitimate legislative purpose for obtaining Trump's tax returns. The Ways and Means Committee then filed a lawsuit, which has yet to be resolved.

President-elect Joe BidenJoe BidenBiden has spoken with some GOP senators, chief of staff says Trump told advisers he could announce 2024 bid shortly after certification of Biden win: report Obama 'troubled' by GOP attempts to cast doubt on election results: 'That's a dangerous path' MORE's administration could choose to respond to Neal's requests by providing the Ways and Means Committee with Trump's tax returns. House Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiHow Biden might use executive power to advance economic agenda Overnight Health Care: Schumer, Pelosi want Heroes Act as 'starting point' in new COVID-19 relief talks | Labs warn of possible delays in test results amid surge in demand | Federal government partners with pharmacies for coronavirus vaccine distribution On The Money: Biden, Democratic leaders push for lame-duck coronavirus deal | Business groups shudder at Sanders as Labor secretary | Congress could pass retirement bill as soon as this year MORE (D-Calif.) predicted in August that Neal would be able to obtain Trump's tax returns under a Biden administration.

A spokesperson for Biden told the Journal that"President-elect Biden has made clear that he will have an independent Department of Justice, free of improper political influence, and that they'll be tasked with following the letter of the law in any decision they make."

Earlier this month, the Ways and Means Committeemoved todrop its appealof a judge's order that requires the panel to give notice if it requests Trump's New York tax returns under a state law.

Neal has never requested Trump's state tax returns. A committee spokesperson said that the panel dropped the appeal on the advice of counsel and was going to focus on its case over obtaining Trump's federal tax returns.

Read the rest here:
House Democrats to renew effort to obtain Trump's tax returns next year | TheHill - The Hill

Letter: Letter revealing of Democrats’ divisive position – South Whidbey Record

Editor,

Thank you, Ann Adams, for your Nov. 11 letter to the editor, which again identified the Democrat position on American politics.

First, you identify the Democrat narrative that the election is decided, decided by some pollsters and media calling the election for the Democrat candidate.

Then you identify that joy in Mudville is back real joy because the Democrat candidate has won.

Then you go on to note that we can go on to rebuild our democracy by single handedly and staunchly supporting the new Democrat president at every turn, even if we have to turn on some in the Democratic Party who are not all in.

Is this reality? Im not sure?

I thought voters determined elections, not the media or pollsters, and when voters vote only living legal United States citizens count.

It seems to me that until the process is done and the citizen votes are tabulated, authenticated and perhaps adjudicated, will we have an actual official president elect.

As far as building our democracy is concerned, its already been done by a group of people in the 18th century and the result is a constitutional republic spelled out in the Constitution of the United States of America.

The Constitution begins We the People and it includes all those people whom you didnt really mention in your letter, i.e. the 72 plus million people who voted for the other candidate in the election, unless youre figuring on marching them all to the gulags of social and mainstream shaming media.

Jim Henderson

Freeland

Visit link:
Letter: Letter revealing of Democrats' divisive position - South Whidbey Record

The election-night fiasco in the states that will haunt Democrats for a decade – POLITICO

After indecisive results last week, two Georgia races that will decide the fate of the Senate are headed to runoffs in January. POLITICOs Elena Schneider breaks down how both parties plan to win and how Trumps refusal to concede could shape the campaigns.

Rodriguez noted that the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee was on target to spend $50 million on their Flip Everything campaign aimed at state legislatures. In a valiant effort to put on a happy face, she said, The spin that we've seen now is Democrats saying, 'Well, you can't lose something you didn't have,' but they did lose a lot of money in the process to have this showing in 2020.

Beyond desperate spin, Mutnick identified a few more genuine grounds for modest optimism among Democrats about the decennial redistricting process. One is the trend toward less partisan redistricting, as was evidenced in Virginia by voters backing a referendum to turn the process over to an independent commission.

Since long-term demographic changes generally favor Democrats, they will likely do fine in any process that isnt nakedly partisan (though some Democrats in Virginia, where the Legislature is now Democratic, were looking forward to doing unto others as was previously done unto to them.) Also, Mutnick said, Democrats have generally gained when courts have intervened in redistrictings: I think its possible that we have more court-drawn maps this cycle than we did in 2010.

One welcome victim of the 2020 elections: The overly simplistic assumption that Hispanic voters can be lumped for political purposes in a mostly predictable bloc.

I think the first thing is we need to rethink what is the Latino vote, because Cubans in Miami don't have the same interests as Mexican Americans in Arizona, don't have the same interests as Puerto Ricans in central Florida, Rodriguez said. While Hispanics plainly helped shift Arizona at the presidential level in Democrat Joe Bidens favor, it is also clear that Trumps anti-socialism message resonated with many voters beyond Cuban Americans in South Florida.

Long term, Rodriguez and Rayasam agreed, is much more targeted and locally oriented appeals to Hispanic voters by both parties, and an understanding by Democrats especially that they cant be taken for granted.

Each panelist also identified a person, or an idea, that we will be hearing more of in the years ahead.

Mutnicks idea was litigation, and the person shell be watching is Democratic lawyer Marc Elias, who was general counsel to Hillary Clintons 2016 campaign. The 51-year-old Elias has taken the lead on challenging maps that Democrats argue are drawn with the aim of diluting the power of progressive voters, including minorities.

His knowledge of election law is profound, Mutnick said. And he's dedicated to helping achieve what Democrats feel to be fair maps. So to the extent that he can pursue that legal avenue throughout the next decade, that's going to be huge in different states for Democrats and getting maps that are more favorable to them.

Dixon sees in Tallahassee a Florida version of the progressive vs. establishment battles that have played out in Washington. The equivalent there of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) is an Orlando-area state representative named Anna Eskamani, a 30-year-old Iranian American.

She's very progressive, kind of goes after her own party on Twitter, is kind of expected to at least consider running for governor in 2022 even though she's relatively young, Dixon said. She's become a force within the progressive side of the Florida Democratic Party. And I would suspect that it's going to be a name that gets a little more national attention within the next year or two, especially going into the 2022 cycle where she's expected to try to try to make some noise.

For her part, Rayasam sees Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican who is widely expected to run and win reelection in 2022, as having some national potential. He has won both his governors races by huge margins, she notes. He's pretty popular here. There hasn't been a Democrat that's been able to really even touch or get close to him. And I think we're going to see I'm curious to see what he does with his popularity here in Texas, whether he translates that into national ambitions.

Rodriguez closed the conversation with what may be the safest bet: Continued interest in shaping state politics, as the narrow balance of power at the national level raises the stakes everywhere. Politics and money at the state level is the long-term trend to watch, Rodriguez said. I think there's a recognition that to make inroads at the national level, you've got to look down the ballot.

As progressive groups finish licking wounds from 2020, many will likely regroup for a new battle, Rodriguez said: I think a lot of these organizations are going to try and do what they didn't accomplish this year.

The rest is here:
The election-night fiasco in the states that will haunt Democrats for a decade - POLITICO

Democrats left to sift through aftermath of blue wave that never crested – The Guardian

Joe Biden secured a historic presidential victory on Saturday yet some Democrats have spent the tense days since the election engulfed in recriminations, finger-pointing and infighting as they sift through the aftermath of expectations of a blue wave that never crested.

Long-simmering tensions between moderate Democrats who represent conservative districts and progressives who have massive online followings erupted into public view, after a series of unexpected losses in parts of the country where the president proved surprisingly resilient.

Once united behind the shared priority of removing Donald Trump from office, swaths of Democrats are now racked with anxiety and uncertainty over a path forward.

Moderates accused liberals of embracing socialism and supporting leftwing proposals to defund the police, which Republicans weaponized against vulnerable Democrats. Progressives argue that the base powered many of the partys biggest victories and that it was the lack of an inspiring message and not their politics that hurt members. Meanwhile, Democrats were alarmed by Trumps apparent success with Hispanic voters in some battleground states.

In the weeks before the election, Democrats had begun to imagine the legislative agenda their party could deliver with an undivided Congress and a new Biden administration. House Democrats anticipated expanding their majority by a significant margin potentially even double digits. In the Senate, Democratic challengers, fueled by a historic wave of donations, appeared poised to knock off enough Republican incumbents to take the gavel from Mitch McConnell, even in states such as Iowa and South Carolina where Democrats rarely win statewide.

As Democrats engage in what has become a ritualistic practice of soul-searching, there are unlikely to be any easy answers. The election delivered a mix of successes and disappointments for both parties, raising complex questions about their coalition and their message.

For now, Democratic leaders are trying to keep the focus on their victories Biden defeated Donald Trump, they will retain their majority in the House and control of the Senate will be decided by a pair of runoff elections in Georgia in January.

This has been a lifeordeath fight for the fate of our democracy, the House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, told reporters on Friday, with tens of thousands of votes still uncounted. We did not win every battle in the House, but we did win the war.

Tensions came to a head during a private conference call with House Democrats on Thursday, part of which was made public by the Washington Post, when the congresswoman Abigail Spanberger, a freshman who narrowly held on to her seat in a conservative-leading Virginia district, accused her liberal colleagues of costing the party seats by referring to themselves as socialists.

If we are classifying Tuesday as a success, she added, using an expletive, the party will get torn apart in 2022.

Republicans struggled to portray Biden, whose reputation as centrist, bipartisan dealmaker was forged over the course of his decades-long political career, as a captive of the radical left. But there was evidence the attacks were more effective on Senate and House candidates, particularly those running in a forbidding environment.

Moderates have pointed to Nebraskas 2nd congressional district, which Biden flipped but where Democratic candidate Kara Eastman, a progressive who supported Medicare for All, lost.

The whole progressivism is bad argument just doesnt have any compelling evidence that Ive seen, the New York congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who identifies as a democratic socialist, wrote on Twitter. She added that such attacks by Republicans are about racial resentment and youre not gonna make that go away.

Progressives not only won re-election but expanded their ranks in blue districts across the country. Members of the so-called Squad, including Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan, sailed to victory on Tuesday. They will be joined in the House by newcomers Jamaal Bowman of New York and Cori Bush of Missouri.

They argue that Democrats political future depends on organizing and mobilizing young people and people of color who increasingly make up the partys base.

This election, they say, relied on liberal organizing in Georgia, led by Black women like Stacey Abrams, who was among the women Biden considered as a potential running mate, and in Arizona, led by young Latinos activists, helped give Biden a narrow but decisive edge in both states. And in Florida, voters approved a $15 minimum wage even though they elected Trump, who roundly rejected the proposal.

At the same time, centrists argue that Democrats shift to the left since Trumps election has alienated moderate and independents voters who the party must attract if it hopes to win in rural and exurban parts of the country.

Weve got to get back to the meat and potatoes issues and the issues where were taking care of their families, and we also need to stop acting like were smarter than everybody else, because were not, the former Missouri senator Claire McCaskill said in an interview on MSNBC.

McCaskill, who lost her bid for re-election in 2018, said that Democrats had been too narrowly focused on social issues such as gun control, abortion and rights for LGBTQ+ Americans and other people who we as a party, quote, unquote, look after.

As we circled the issues, we left some voters behind and Republicans dove in with a vengeance and grabbed those voters, she said.

The remark drew sharp rebukes from progressive Democrats and McCaskill later apologized for her language. But her broader point remains the source of deep division: how do Democrats gain power in an electoral system that is increasingly representative of a white minority over a diverse majority?

Another troubling sign for Democrats was a dip in support that they received from Latinos in Florida and parts of Texas. Yet in Arizona, Nevada, Colorado and Georgia, Latinos, particularly young activists and women, were likely critical to Democratic successes.

It was all the more surprising for Democrats, since Trump frequently scapegoated migrants and began his 2016 campaign calling some Mexican immigrants are rapists. But ahead of the election, Latino strategists and pollsters warned that antipathy to Trump was not enough and that Democrats needed to invest more deeply in outreach to this increasingly complex and diverse electorate.

In 2020, Latino voters, more than anything else, chose each other, Marisa Franco, the executive director of Mijente, a progressive Latino civil rights group, said in a statement. The Biden campaign may have chosen not to spend time in working-class, immigrant and people of color neighborhoods but that is exactly where his victory is coming from and where the solutions hell need to champion will have to start.

In brief remarks on Friday night, Biden sought to dispel any notion that the outcome undercut his governing agenda.

What is becoming clearer each hour is that record numbers of Americans from all races, faiths, religions chose change over more of the same, he said. They have given us a mandate for action on Covid and the economy and climate change and systemic racism.

Bernie Sanders, the progressive leader who worked aggressively to elect Biden, said in a conversation with the Squad that progressives must now work to make sure that Biden becomes the most progressive president since FDR.

Read more:
Democrats left to sift through aftermath of blue wave that never crested - The Guardian