Archive for August, 2017

MTC spoils customers with extra data for social networking – Namibia Economist

To show appreciation for their customers, mobile telecommunications firm, MTC announced its latest Aweh campaign which will give subscribers an additional 50% data for social media use.

The campaign which started this week and will run until 13 September and will be available to all MTCs customers that subscribe to any of the Aweh bundles.

Tim Ekandjo, MTCs Chief Human Capital and Corporate Affairs officer said that the campaign attests to the companys appreciation of its customers, adding that the gesture is an appreciative act of the unwavering loyalty and patronage from its valued customers.

Given the ever-changing and increasing social media features being rolled-out on a daily, data use has become a daily exercise, and it is against this background that MTC decided, through the Aweh campaign to give its loyal subscribers 50% extra data specifically for social media usage.

The offer is valid for all Aweh products, including those sold by MTC Dealers as well as those that are available via the vending units and Customers will not be required to make any additional payment, MTCs Product Solutions Manager, Andre De Jager said.

See the original post:
MTC spoils customers with extra data for social networking - Namibia Economist

SC admin orders judges, personnel to observe caution in posts to social media – Inquirer.net

The Office of the Court Administrator (OCAD) has advised judges and court personnel nationwide to be cautious when sharing their photographs and views on social networking sites.

OCA Circular No. 173 dated Aug. 17, 2017, was issued as it noted that some judges and court personnel have been active in various social networking sites like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

It has been observed that some judges and court personnel have been taking active part in social networking sites by sharing personal photographs and updates, and posting their views and comments on certain issues and current events, the circular, which was signed by Court Administrator Jose Midas Marquez, stated.

Marquez said that while being active on social networking sites can be considered an exercise of freedom of expression, it may be considered inappropriate for members of the judiciary due to the higher standard of integrity, candor and fairness reposed on them.

Accordingly, in communicating and socializing through social networks, judges must bear in mind that what they communicateregardless of whether it is a personal matter or part of his or her judicial dutiescreates and contributes to the peoples opinion not just of the judge but of the entire judiciary of which he or she is a part, he added.

Marquez cited Section 6, Canon 4 of the New Code of Judicial Conduct, which provides that in the exercise of freedom of expression, judges and court personnel shall always conduct themselves in a manner as to preserve the dignity of the judicial office and the impartiality and independence of the judiciary.

All told, judges and court personnel who participate in social media are enjoined to be cautious and circumspect in posting photographs, liking posts and making comments in public on social networking sites, for public confidence in the judiciary (may be) eroded by their irresponsible or improper conduct,' the circular read.

Covered by the circular were judges and court personnel in the first and second level courts.

The first level courts include the Metropolitan Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts in Cities, Municipal Circuit Trial Courts and Sharia Circuit Courts.

The second level courts are the Regional Trial Courts and Sharia District Courts. JPV

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

Go here to read the rest:
SC admin orders judges, personnel to observe caution in posts to social media - Inquirer.net

Judges, court workers told: Exercise prudence in using social media – Inquirer.net

BE careful. With the rise of social media, the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) has called on trial judges and court employees to exercise prudence in posting photographs, liking posts and making comments in social networking sites.

In a circular dated August 17, 2017, Court Administrator Jose Midas Marquez said much is expected of members of the judiciary and other court employees due to the higher standard of integrity, candor, and fairness reposed on them.

As the visible personification of law and justice, judges and court employees have a higher standard of conduct. The standard of conduct expected from members of judiciary is much higher than an ordinary man, he said.

Thus, judges and court personnel are reminded to conduct themselves in a way that would not call into question the dignity of the judiciary. Judges and court personnel must be above suspicion, he added.

Copies of the circular were sent by the OCA to all first and second level trial courts nationwide. The circular was issued after OCA observed that some judges and court personnel have been active in social networking sites by sharing personal photographs and updates as well as posting their views and comments on certain issues and current events.

While judges and court employees are not prohibited from engaging in social media, they are reminded that when they do, they do not thereby shed off their status as members of the judiciary, Marquez said.

He said using of social networking sites like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram is an exercise of freedom of expression, but there are restrictions upon a judges conduct inherent in the judicial office.

Read the rest here:
Judges, court workers told: Exercise prudence in using social media - Inquirer.net

Linkedin to open Detroit office, hire 30 – Detroit Free Press

TODAY'S TOP STORIESDream Cruise cars rev it or love it? | 0:57

Do you love or hate the noise from the Dream Cruise cars? Junfu Han, Detroit Free Press

1 of 7

Whether you're picking them from an orchard or from a shelf in the grocery store, here's a look at the different varieties of apples in Michigan and when they're harvested, so you know when to be on the lookout for them. Detroit Free Press

2 of 7

The family of Marine recruit Raheel Siddiqui speaks out after Siddiqui's death on Parris Island, N.C., during training. The cause of his death was deemed suicide, but the family and Rep. Debbie Dingell disagree. Kimberly P. MItchell, Detroit Free Press

3 of 7

U.S. Education Secretary Betsy DeVos today denounced white nationalists involved in violence last weekend in Charlottesville, Va., calling them racial bigots and saying their views are totally abhorrent to the American ideal. Todd Spangler/Detroit Free Press

4 of 7

One month after claiming he tried to beat up his lawyer, ex-Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick is taking another shot at his attorney. Elissa Robinson/DFP

5 of 7

Selfridge Air National Guard Base is hosting its air show and open house celebrating 100 years. Christina Hall, Detroit Free Press

6 of 7

The Detroit Free Press/Chemical Bank Marathon will happen in downtown Detroit on Oct. 14-15. Wochit

7 of 7

Dream Cruise cars rev it or love it?

Michigan apple harvest guide: When to find your favorites

What you need to know about death of Marine recruit Raheel Siddiqui

DeVos blasts 'racial bigots' in Charlottesville

Kwame Kilpatrick is blasting his ex-attorney: Could it set him free?

What you need to know about Selfridge Air National Guard Base

What you need to know about the Detroit Free Press Marathon

LinkedIn Corp. headquarters in Mountain View, Calif. in 2011.(Photo: Paul Sakuma, AP)

Social networking siteLinkedIn says it plans to open a sales office in downtown Detroit and initially hire 30 local workers to fill it.

The office willfocuson selling LinkedIn's products to assist businesses withmarketing, hiring and sales growth. The office will open later this year;itsprecise location will later be announced,saidMarquise McCoy, LinkedIn's corporate communications manager.

This will actually be the first office that we are opening in the U.S. in 10 years," Mike Gamson, LinkedIn's senior vice president of global solutions, said in a statement. LinkedIn chose Detroit after evaluating more than 10 other cities.

LinkedIn has already posted job listingsfor positions in the futureDetroit office.

More: Microsoft to move to downtown Detroit

More: Microsoft's move boosts Detroit's credibility as tech hub

Based in Mountain View, Calif.,LinkedIn is a social networking service that highlights users' work and educationalbackgrounds.

The tech company was founded in 2003 and last year was boughtby Microsoft for more than $26billion.

"We chose Detroit because it's a city with amazing talent," Gamson said. "There is a proven spirit of greatness and innovation, and these are the types of people with whom we want to work."

"We're committed to creating an economic opportunity for everyone and sometimes that means bringing the jobs to where the people are. We're excited to be part of the Detroit economic comeback story," he said.

LinkedIn will join other well-known tech companies with current and future outposts in downtown Detroit, including Twitter and Microsoft. Microsoft said earlier this year that it will relocate its southeast Michigan officeto downtown's One Campus Martius building from Southfield.

Contact JC Reindl: 313-222-6631 or jcreindl@freepress.com. Follow him on Twitter@JCReindl.

Read or Share this story: http://on.freep.com/2wX3gSE

View original post here:
Linkedin to open Detroit office, hire 30 - Detroit Free Press

Homeschoolers ramp up 4th Amendment battle – WND.com

The Home School Legal Defense Association, the nations premiere advocate for homeschooling, is representing a family in its suit against a police officers unauthorized entry into a private home, even though the case has nothing to do with homeschooling.

Its because the case brought by LuAnn, Joseph and Timothy Batt against police officer Joseph Buccilli, who forced his way into the familys home without either a warrant or an emergency reason, illustrates the battle for the front door.

The family is appealing to the the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing the Fourth Amendment protects them from unreasonable searches.

The amendment states: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The case is relevant to homeschoolers, HSDLA explains, because early homeschoolers sometimesfound an investigative social worker at their front door, often accompanied by uniformed police officers.

These authorities were typically investigating anonymous tips that didnt have much to do with homeschooling itself often something like this: The children are always home, they dont go to school, and the family seems really religious.'

Police State USA: How Orwells Nightmare Is Becoming Our Reality chronicles how America has arrived at the point of being a de facto police state and what led to an out-of-control government that increasingly ignores the Constitution. Order today!

HSLDA said homeschoolers soon learned that front-door encounters with an investigative social worker could be traumatic for both parents and children alike.

Protecting our member families from such unwarranted investigations was what drew HSLDA into what we call the battle for the front door defending Fourth Amendment rights, the organizationsaid.

In the New York case, Buccilli, a police officerin Orchard City, barged into the familys home without a warrant after being told he had no permission to enter.

He claimed social services had asked him to do a welfare check at the home.

According to an HSLDA brief to the 2nd Circuit, which asks that the lower courts decision to award Buccilli immunity in the case be overturned, the officeradmitted he knew nothing about any allegations of wrongdoingor any emergencyand didnt know who asked for the welfare check.

I dont know the basis of the allegations or what the welfare concerns are, he told the family. We do have a right to come in here when an allegation is made.

I dont need a search warrant. I dont need to ask permission, he continued.

And, multiple times, he threatened anyone who obstructed him with arrest.

He ended up talking to a senior citizen, LuAnn Batts father, Fred Puntoriero, who was well-dressed and well-groomed and was being cared for by a nurse, and left. Social services closed down its investigation almost immediately.

But the lawsuit against the officer argueshe did exactly what the Constitution, affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court, forbids.

Entries without a warrant are allowed for several reasons: when an officer is in hot pursuit of a suspect, when evidence is in imminent danger of being destroyed or someone is in need of emergency aid.

The brief points outnone of those circumstances existed for Buccilli.

Pointedly, the brief states, In 2004, the Supreme Court said no reasonable officer could claim to be unaware of the basic rule, well established by our cases, that absent consent or exigency, a warrantless search of the home is presumptively unconstitutional.

It turns out, the brief explains, that Puntorieros daughter-in-law, who had been involved in disputes with the family over Freds care and property, had called authorities with the complaint that two weeks earlier her husband had expressed concern over his fathers welfare.

However, when Fred livedwith her and her husband, he was diagnosed with failure to thrive.

She told adult protective services that her husband had said two weeks earlier that Fred was lethargic when he visited.

APS admitted such reports from an underlying family dispute often are false, but the officer charged into the home anyway.

On April 17, 2012, Lt. Buccilli forcibly entered the Batts home, without consent or a warrant, to conduct a welfare check. On that day, federal law prohibited police from forcibly entering a home without consent or a warrant for any reason whatsoever, unless the circumstances fell within one of the established narrowly-drawn exigency exceptions, the brief explains.

The circumstances Lt. Buccilli confronted presented no exigency whatsoever.

HSLDAs Darren Jones, a litigation attorney, said theFourth Amendment doesnt have an exception based on a welfare check.'

Before police can come into a home, they must have either a warrant or some clearly defined exception, like an emergency or a hot pursuit of a suspect, he explained.

HSLDA Senior Counsel James R. Mason previously notedthe Batts were members of HSLDA since their son was a child.

He grew up reading about his Fourth Amendment rights in The Home School Court Report.

Mason pointed out Buccilli even threatened the family with informing adult protect services about [your] lack of cooperation.

The officerthen said, You should not pretend to know the law.

Mason argued the Fourth Amendment does not permit the police to enter anyones home without a warrant unless there is a real emergency even if its called a welfare check.'

The report said HSLDA has long believed that it is important to dispel the notion among police and other authorities that all Fourth Amendment bets are off when they demand to enter a home to conduct a welfare check.'

Police State USA: How Orwells Nightmare Is Becoming Our Reality chronicles how America has arrived at the point of being a de facto police state and what led to an out-of-control government that increasingly ignores the Constitution. Order today!

Read the original:
Homeschoolers ramp up 4th Amendment battle - WND.com