Archive for July, 2017

President Trump: MSNBC Fired Greta Van Susteren for Not Going Along With ‘Trump Hate’ – Fortune

President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in the Oval Office of the White House, Tuesday, June 20, 2017, in Washington. Evan VucciAP

Updated: Jul 01, 2017 10:50 AM ET

President Donald Trump on Saturday said that MSNBC fired anchor Greta Van Susteren because she did not agree with the network's so-called "Trump hate."

The President made the claim in an early-morning tweet that read: "Word is that @Greta Van Susteren was let go by her out of control bosses at @NBC & @Comcast because she refused to go along w/ 'Trump hate!'"

Van Susteren happened to be on Twitter at the time but did not directly respond to the President's tweet. Instead, she quoted a tweet from a fake Kim Kardashian West account mentioning Trump that was posted several minutes after his tweet.

"You know what? TRUMPET," the account tweeted at the President.

"What does this mean?" Van Susteren replied.

Van Susteren, who was hired in January to host For the Record with Greta, announced she was "out" at MSNBC on Thursday, with her husband and a close friend saying that the news came without warning, according to CNN Money.

Vanity Fair , who first reported news of Van Susteren's termination, attributed the decision to a lack of ratings. A New York Times profile of the network last month touched on the issue, as well.

Its not breaking out, NBC News Chairman Andrew Lack said of her show in the Times piece. Everybody wants every new show to break out Day 1. I think it takes time, and Ive got a lot of patience.

Van Susteren wasn't the only MSNBC host mentioned by the President on Saturday morning. Shortly after his comment about Van Susteren, he turned his attention back to Morning Joe hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski.

"Crazy Joe Scarborough and dumb as a rock Mika are not bad people, but their low rated show is dominated by their NBC bosses. Too bad!" Trump tweeted.

His latest comments follow a Thursday tweet in which he said that Brzezinski was "bleeding badly from a face-lift." The remark was widely condemned by both Republican and Democratic lawmakers.

He also railed against CNN, again calling the network "fake news."

Follow this link:
President Trump: MSNBC Fired Greta Van Susteren for Not Going Along With 'Trump Hate' - Fortune

The alt-right is tearing itself apart. What remains after will be the future of far-right politics. – Mic

Just the very definition of the alt-right is it a moving target. Its been described as a sociopathic nonsense experiment in trolling and chaos, the future of conservative youth movements and an organized resurfacing of white supremacist politics. The alt-right is chimeric, confusing and intentionally ambiguous, largely because its adherents are composed of dozens of competing ideologies.

And now, the alt-right is thinning out its ranks.

The movements grassroots heroes are turning into a circular firing squad. Over the past few weeks, popular far-right figures have been attacking and doxxing one another in an intra-right conflict, and its tearing apart the loose circle of the countrys most visible pro-Trump provacateurs.. For the white nationalists who built the movement, this is a natural part of the alt-rights evolution a cleansing that will leave behind a serious nationalist movement that can hold Trump accountable to his darkest campaign promises.

The various banners flying at the Lincoln Memorial, where white nationalists held court last weekend

The schism was best represented last weekend in Washington, D.C., where the superstars of the far right split themselves into two competing rallies, each disavowing the other. At the first rally at the White House were the A-List of alternative media propaganda and dirty tricks, like Mike Cernovich, Jack Posobiec and Laura Loomer the latter two are most recently famous for interrupting a controversial Shakespeare performance. And at the Lincoln Memorial rally were the hard right commentators and white nationalists who claimed that the media figures at the White House were a bunch of liars, fanboys and celebrity wannabes with no real politics.

If you look at the politics being pushed out, the fat is getting trimmed, James Allsup, a YouTuber and young conservative who opened the festivities at the Lincoln Memorial rally, told Mic on Thursday.

Richard Spencer, a white nationalist who has become famous since Trumps election, is a crowd favorites at rallies that will tolerate his presence.

The divide is reflective of an ideological crisis in conservative media at large. In lieu of showing outright support or condemnation of Trumps policies, conservative mainstays like the National Review, and even networks like Fox News, are instead picking low-hanging fruit by going after the perceived hysteria of Trumps liberal detractors. Instead of having to walk the daily minefield of being pro-Trump, they can instead build a coalition thats anti-anti-Trump.

For the far right, it was galvanizing at least for a while. At free speech rallies across the country, the loose coalition of militia groups, 4chan trolls, white nationalists and literal adult frat boys have gathered to draw out anti-fascist, black bloc protesters in violent clashes. At one of these rallies in Boston, the founder of the Oath Keepers one of the largest militia groups in the country called the antifa a godsend for the way it brought together the alt-right under a common cause.

In Berkeley, CA, antifascists clashed with far-right groups in the first of many street battles between the far-right and the far-left.

But recently, antifa stopped taking the bait, leaving these groups standing in their own company, forced to come to terms with their strange new bedfellows.

The Oath Keepers, for example, are strictly Constitutionalist, and detest the white nationalists that show up to rallies. Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes, who travels to many of these rallies to provide a security detail of right-wing military veterans and former police, made it clear that dividing people along racial lines is dangerous. On his terms, the white nationalists, who were definitely present, were not welcome.

This is not their event. If we identify them and theyre wearing an armband or whatever, we make them take that shit off, Rhodes told Mic in Boston. We all have a common ground of a Constitution and a Bill of Rights. But a Communist does not respect the Constitution, and neither does the white nationalist.

And then, at one of these rallies in Houston, someone mistaken as an Oath Keeper put a white supremacist in a headlock, and neo-Nazi news hub the Daily Stormer began referring to the Oath Keepers as the Boomer Antifa for, as the Washington Post put it, not being racist enough.

But when it came time for dueling rallies in D.C., Rhodes was speaking at the event held by Cernovich and Posobiec and firmly on the side of the pro-Trump ratfuckers. The young 4channers that Rhodes once looked to as the future of the patriot movement were now calling his group the Oath Cucks.

For the nationalist alt-right, its good riddance to those who join up with the media personalities and cheerleaders that Allsup calls pro-Trump sycophants.

Allsup, 21, treads a careful line: Hes a popular young commentator who advances a new vision of far-right politics while keeping his distance from the darker rhetoric of the white nationalists in his company. A dapper race realist, if you will. This year, Allsup made a symbolic run for the national chair of the College Republicans, and has repeatedly criticized mainstream conservatives for cleaving to historically losing causes. In one diplomatic example, Allsup came to the defense of Tomi Lahren after she was ostracized from the conservative punditry for being pro-choice.

Allsup, like innumerable Trump voters, has been disappointed by the the new presidents inability to make good on his promised nationalism. He wants Trump to build the wall, and do away with Obama-era protections for undocumented immigrant children born in America. Allsup says that the current purge could lead to a more militant, politically organized alt-right free of the fanboys unwilling to hold Trump accountable to his promises, who believe politics is a function of retweets and viral media stunts.

If Trump returns to his base and starts enacting right-wing policies, youll see some infighting die down, Allsup said. But if Trump keeps pushing an agenda thats indistinguishable from Paul Ryan, youll see infighting continue on the right, and a galvanization on the alternative right wing.

What is the galvanizing theme behind this vision of a far-right Republican politics? Whiteness. In Allsups estimation, the next generation of voters will be alienated enough by anti-white sentiment in the media that real nationalism will have a chance at winning a young electorate, if Republicans can take advantage of the opportunity.

He looks at how Republicans have tried to court the Latino vote, for example, and thinks thats all wasted time. Instead, he says Republicans should be spending money in states with vast white majorities, while Democrats focus on states with rising hispanic populations like Texas and Arizona. Republicans need to be pushed, he says, and the newly militant, political alt right could be the internal opposition party that moves them in that direction.

The question becomes: Is the next generation of voters ready to hear race realism, pro-white tribalism or perhaps even white nationalism as a legitimate argument, or has America left explicitly racial politics firmly in our dark history?

I think the Overton window is moving, and as a result of Trump its moved so much further right that these ideas are being talked about again, Allsup said. Being called a racist doesnt have the same zing that it used to. That boogeyman is out of the closet.

See original here:
The alt-right is tearing itself apart. What remains after will be the future of far-right politics. - Mic

The ‘Alt-Right’ and ISIS Agree On More Than You Think – Patheos (blog)

You might not think conservative white nationalists within the so-called Alt-right could possibly agree with Islamic terrorists from the Middle East. You might be wrong.

Richard Spencer, who says he coined the term Alt-right in 2008, recently tweeted about Austrias controversial decision to ban women from wearing burqas in public places. He responded by saying he supports compulsory burqas for all Muslim women in Europe.

I support *compulsory* burkas for Muslims in Europe. The last thing we want is assimilation! https://t.co/aVMO4CKnuz

Richard Spencer (@RichardBSpencer) June 13, 2017

Ill give you one guess as to who else supports mandatory burqas for Muslim women: The Islamic State (ISIS) and basically all Islamic extremists. Women under ISIS rule in Iraq and Syria, for instance, face harsh wardrobe restrictions enforced by religious police.

ISIS also opposes the assimilation of Muslims into western cultures, and even encourages violence against their fellow believers to prevent it. Islamic terrorists were likely over the moon after a man drove his van into a group of Muslims near a mosque less than two weeks ago, according to Newsday Columnist William F. B. OReilly.

That fight is essential, in their doctrinaire minds, to prevent the assimilation of millions of Muslims into western society. Every burqa shed, every new Muslim Lions Club membership executed is a strike at the heart of fundamentalist Islam.

When interviewed, Spencer contested my assertion that he agrees with ISIS on this issue but couldnt explain how he doesnt.

Well, I dont *agree* with them. My sympathies are with European, secular leaders like Bashar al-Assad. That being said, this is projecting European norms onto a drastically different region.

Spencer went on the admit that he can see how a Caliphate is a more natural political order in the Middle East. Looks like another agreement to me!

I wouldnt say that such a thing would accomplish my goals. An ISIS caliphate could be an extreme danger to Europeans; it could become a base for a conquest of Europe. From one angle, perhaps an aggressive caliphate would be exactly what Europeans needdangerous, violent *challenge*, something that would make us understand who we are and bring about manliness in politics.

On assimilation, Spencer doubled down:

Yes, the last thing I want is assimilation, though. That would simply mean the loss of European culture and identity. To have an identity, one needs an Other. Liberalism (and Abrahamic monotheism, btw) basically has no concept of the Other; we are all one: all individuals, all Christians, all Muslims, etc.

The mandatory burqa isnt the only similarity between the beliefs of ISIS and those of white nationalists like Richard Spencer, of course. Spencer has championed the notion that things will be better if people returned to their cultural homeland (he calls it peaceful ethnic-cleansing), and thats pretty much all ISIS wants: An Islamic caliphate without outside (secular) influences.

It would be easy to play a game of Mad Libs with the following paragraph, written by Spencer, and make it apply to ISIS. You wouldnt even need to switch many words.

For us immigration is a proxy for race. In that way, immigration can be good or bad: it can be a conquest (as it seems now) . . . or a European in-gathering, something like White Zionism. It all depends on the immigrants. And we should open our minds to the positive possibilities of mass immigration from the White world.

Why are these similarities so easy to find? Because both ISIS and the Alt-right lie on the extreme end of the xenophobia and fascism scales, and they both propagate their nonsense by demonizing the Other. Oddly enough, all the racist outbursts and rants about manliness stem from the same place as the bombs and rigid fundamentalism: fear. They were so weak as to succumb to the fear of mere outsiders. Dont let the same thing happen to you.

David G. McAfeeis a Religious Studies graduate, journalist, and author ofNo Sacred Cows: Investigating Myths, Cults, and the Supernatural,Atheist Answers: Rational Responses to Religious Questions,The Book of Gods,The Belief Book,Mom, Dad, Im an Atheist: The Guide to Coming Out as a Non-believer, andDisproving Christianity and other Secular Writings. He is also the founder of TheParty of Reason and Progressand a frequent contributor toAmerican Atheist Magazine. McAfee, who writes about science, skepticism, and faith, attended University of California, Santa Barbara and graduated with bachelors degrees in English and Religious Studies with an emphasis on Christianity and Mediterranean religions.

Read more:
The 'Alt-Right' and ISIS Agree On More Than You Think - Patheos (blog)

Al Sharpton Isn’t Too Worried About Jay-Z’s ‘4:44’ Reference To His … – BET

I dont know how we got to this point, but we literally have Jay-Z referencing Al Sharpton on his new album, and not for his often profound words about race and religion.

The reverend has made himself into a meme recently by posting himself prior and post working out. The Internet has had a field day with these shenanigans and its been one of the biggest running jokes of 2017. Its so big in fact, that even Hov has used some of the lyrics on his brand new 4:44 album.

Yall think small, I think Biggie / Yall whole pass is in danger, ten Mississippi / Al Sharpton in the mirror takin selfies / How is him or Bill Cosby sposed to help me? he raps on the song Family Feud.

Well, Sharpton wasnt going to let it pass, and decided to respond to Jays poking fun at him. Via Twitter, AS said he wasnt about to stop taking selfies.

Tell Jay Z we still taking selfies...but I'm taking care of business down here too! he tweeted. W/ @YazzTheGreatest in btwn sessions at #EssenceFest2017.

We really hope Reverend Sharpton doesnt stop. Yall really have gotten out of hand with this though. Ugh, the tomfoolery.

Anyway, peep the reverends tweet about Jay-Zs 4:44 line below.

Read more:
Al Sharpton Isn't Too Worried About Jay-Z's '4:44' Reference To His ... - BET

Ann Coulter bursts with excitement over ‘fantastic’ tweets about Mika, saying we ‘finally have a president fighting … – BizPac Review

With a heavy reliance on the word fantastic, conservative firebrand Ann Coulter was intensely supportive of President Donald Trumps volatile tweets about MSNBCs Mika Brzezinski heard round the world.

which Coulter sees as fighting back in a what has been a one-sided war with the press.

Critics argue that Trumps tweeting has essentially hijacked his agenda, as described by Fox Business Networks Stuart Varney, who rattled off policy gains this week being overshadowed.

Ive heard that argument, Coulter told Varney on Fridays program. I love the tweets and yesterdays tweet was fantastic.

She went on to say even friends who disagree with her support of Trump called to say the president has got to keep tweeting.

We finally have a president whos going after the press, Coulter said. The idea that the aggression, the war between the president and the media, its fantastic. Its been a one-sided war until now.

And she was emphatic that his tweeting is not a distraction.

It makes the media look even sillier, Coulter insisted, adding that theyre not talking about the administrations agenda anyway.

I think its fantastic, she said of Trump social media efforts. The people get to hear from the president directly.

They are attacking him nonstop, Coulter added. Theyre staging assassination plays in Central Park, holding his head up. It is non-stop, it is vicious.

I cant even watch MSNBC and CNN anymore, Id rather have them talk about some dumb facelifts than have them talk about this nonsense with the Russian conspiracy theory.

Tom is a grassroots activist who distinguished himself as one of the top conservative bloggers in Florida before joining BizPac Review.

See original here:
Ann Coulter bursts with excitement over 'fantastic' tweets about Mika, saying we 'finally have a president fighting ... - BizPac Review