Archive for July, 2017

Black gun owners ask: Does the Second Amendment apply to us? – Christian Science Monitor

July 11, 2017 AtlantaLike many African-Americans of his generation, Phillip Smith, a Californian in his 50s, grew up without a gun in the house. To his parents, gun ownership was not just politically unacceptable, but morally wrong a fount, if anything, of trouble and tragedy.

When he moved his own family to the South in 2002, he found a different tradition, where black families, many of them fresh from the farms, had hunting rifles for sport and, to an extent, self-defense. Mr. Smith was intrigued. As he bought his first guns and began practicing at a gun range, he had an epiphany: Perhaps the Second Amendment is the black mans ultimate sign of full citizenship.

Smiths crossover into the world of guns and ammo makes him part of a widening attempt to, as he says, normalize a black gun-carrying tradition fraught with historical pain and tragedy.

His advocacy for African-American gun rights has turned out to be a potent message. TheNational African-American Gun Associationhe founded has grown from 800 to 20,000 members since 2015. Unlike the primarily white and male National Rifle Association, NAAGA is diverse in both color and gender; 60 percent of its members are women.

The main thing and Id be lying if I said something else is that in the last 18 months the racial tone of the country has tilted in a direction that is alarming, at a minimum, says Smith, who lives in an Atlanta suburb. For African-Americans, were seeing the same old faces, the same type of conversations we saw in the 50s and 60s, and we thought they were dead and gone.

Given that white Americans have led the liberalization of gun laws in the past decade, black gun carry is becoming a test of constitutional agency, injecting what University of Arizona gun culture expert Jennifer Carlson calls the specter of legitimate violence into an already tense political climate. Incidents like the June acquittal of the Minnesota police officer who shot Philando Castile, a legal gun owner, during a traffic stop have added to that tension, gun owners like Smith say as did the National Rifle Associations silence over both his shooting and the verdict.

For some black gun owners, the question is a stark one: Can African-Americans reasonably expect to be covered by the Second Amendment in a country still marbled by racist rhetoric, attitudes, and acts?

In one way, it is saddening and troubling how much hopelessness there must be to make such a massive shift to decide guns might be a necessary answer to a documented rise in overt racism, says Nancy Beck Young, a political historian at the University of Houston.

The shooting of Mr. Castile and the election of President Trump changed things for Dickson Q Amoah, a former Air Force reservist from the outskirts of Chicago.

Like Smith, Mr. Amoah says his parents were vehemently anti-gun.To this day, he says, Honestly I still think that getting rid of all these excess guns in Chicago and the country would be a good thing.

Then he saw the white nationalist salute of Hail Trump near the White House in January. His first thought was: Oh, hell no.

For him, carrying a gun has become a test of a stereotype, as Professor Young says,built on the myth of what the black man was after and what he might do.

I used to worry about what people thought of me as a black man, says Amoah, the president of the 761st Gun Club of Illinois. As a gun-carrier, he says, Now, I just dont care anymore.

The extent of the risk legally armed black men take to carry guns is hard to measure. The Washington Post has found that unarmed black men are 2.5 times more likely to be killed by police than unarmed white men. But there are no hard studies on that have looked at how officers react to armed black men versus armed white ones. Moreover, privacy laws prohibit deep-dive studies of gun registration data to look for patterns by race.

But Ms. Carlson, author of Citizen-Protectors: The Everyday Politics of Guns in an Age of Decline, found a proxy in administrative gun boards that exist in several states to adjudicate gun license issues. She found, in two adjacent Michigan counties,that black concealed-carry applicants are routinely lectured and quizzed in public forums what she calls degradation ceremonies. White gun owners, meanwhile, are addressed without lectures in hearings where they can plead their case in a semi-private room.

Her findings suggest such proceedings for concealed-carry licenses now serve as mechanisms ... to encourage black men to internalize their position at the bottom of the racial ... hierarchy.

That evidence, she says, underscores how some policing strategies, like stop-and-frisk, only work if you can presume that the guns that are being carried are illegal, says Carlson. In that way, gun laws change the ordering of how people think about danger in a way that is way beyond whether there is a gun there or not.

Only about half as many African-American households have guns as white ones 19 percent, compared with 41 percent.And attitudes toward guns remain starkly divided along racial lines. Sixty percent of black voters favor more gun control, while 61 percent of white voters seek more gun rights.

That reflects a deep resistance to guns in African-American communities that goes back to the civil rights era, when blacks, often victims of gun crimes, began to see gun ownership as counterproductive and dangerous. But that doesn't tell the whole story, gun-carry proponents say.

You dig and you realize the civil rights movement wasnt just a nonviolent movement, counters Amoah. The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was a gun carrier. And you look at Malcolm X differently. He was a self-defense guy.

Smith in Atlanta says he has had heated debates with preachers over his gun carry advocacy. To some, it seems a reprise of the Black Panther Party for Self-Defense movement, which led to a wave of gun control laws in the US. After 30 of its members marched, armed and defiant, into the California state capitol in 1967, then-Gov. Ronald Reagan, who ran for president as a staunch Second Amendment defender, signed a law prohibiting open carry in the state.

Scholars say that Second Amendment rights for African-Americans cannot be fought for separately from other rights.

No. 1, Philando Castile was seeking to show an officer his permit when he was killed, so having a gun is not an escape from being killed, says historian Gerald Horne, author of The Counter-Revolution of 1776: Slave Resistance and the Origins of the United States of America.But while that case suggests that African-Americans SecondAmendment rights are not worth as much as those of others, it also brings us to the devalued citizenship of black Americans in 2017. In order to re-value that citizenship it will take a political movement that goes beyond SecondAmendment rights and focuses on the whole panoply of rights generally.

The coast-to-coast growth of NAAGA chapters from a handful to 32 in less than two years seems to mirror a shift, partly a generational one, in that thinking. The number of blacks who prioritize gun rights over gun control rose from 18 percent in 1993 to 34 percent in 2014, according to the Pew Research Center.

Black-owned gun shops say they have seen business increase in the last six months, even as gun sales overall have softened, leading to price cuts of more than 50 percent.

At 280 pounds, Louis Dennard says he can be an intimidating presence until people get to know him as the kind-hearted gardener and pitmaster that he is.

His worry is that racist stereotypes get enshrined into law, under a president who openly questioned former President Barack Obamas citizenship and, in Mr. Dennard's view, is basing his legacy on dismantling the work of the countrys first black president. Right now, they are in the process of prejudicing the system, he says.

Though the growth of his gun club is tied to national politics, Smith is careful to not focus his advocacy on the president or the NRA. He says his toughest critics, so far, have been others in the African-American community, who dont see a strong correlation between the Second Amendment and a sense of full citizenship.

Im trying to let everyone know that you have the right not the God-given right, but the right as an American to carry a gun, says Smith. We have things to overcome in the black community in terms of what you believe you have a right to do as a citizen.

My job is to convince people that it is not radical to have a gun ... to protect your family.

See the original post:
Black gun owners ask: Does the Second Amendment apply to us? - Christian Science Monitor

G20 reiterates commitment to support Africa to end illegal immigration – africanews


africanews
G20 reiterates commitment to support Africa to end illegal immigration
africanews
G20 countries have made commitments to support Africa's economy by encouraging efforts to reduce illegal immigration. ADVERTISING. inRead invented by Teads. The leaders have also called on Africa's private sector to seize available opportunities to ...

and more »

Read the original:
G20 reiterates commitment to support Africa to end illegal immigration - africanews

Bradley Byrne: Combatting illegal immigration – Alabama Today

Kate Steinle became a household name in 2015 after the 32-year old was shot and killed by an illegal immigrant in San Francisco. It was a horrific event that shined light on some serious flaws in our nations immigration system.

The man who killed her, Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, was in our country illegally. Making matters worse, he had already been deported five times and had been convicted of seven felonies. He had no business being in the United States.

San Francisco, where the shooting occurred, is a sanctuary city, meaning they do not cooperate with federal law enforcement officials when it comes to immigration law. Lopez-Sanchez likely felt safe in San Francisco due to their lax immigration laws, even though he was a convicted felon with multiple deportations on his record.

The story of Kate Steinle is just the most high profile example of the problems with the U.S. immigration system, but there are many other horrible stories out there. Our top priority as a federal government should always be to keep citizens safe, and that includes monitoring and controlling who we allow into our country.

Recently, the House of Representatives took action on two important bills to address some of the issues with our broken immigration system. Both bills were strongly supported by President Donald Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who have made enforcing our immigration laws a top priority.

The first bill, the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act, deals directly with the so-called sanctuary cities. Under the legislation, certain federal funding would be cut to cities and counties that refuse to comply with federal law enforcement officials when it comes to immigration law.

In other words, if a city refuses to enforce our federal immigration laws, they should not be receiving millions of dollars in federal funding. These cities must be held responsible for their reckless policies that endanger their citizens.

Under President Barack Obama, I often heard examples of cities or counties who were attempting to enforce immigration laws, but they could not get the help and support they needed from federal officials. Well, under Attorney General Jeff Sessions that is changing. Federal immigration officials are cracking down on law breakers in our country illegally, and they deserve help and support from all our local officials.

The second bill, known as Kates Law, increases the criminal penalties for deported felons who returned to the United States. Like Kates killer, illegal immigrants who are convicted of felonies must face severe consequences if they choose to illegally reenter our country again.

This bill actually drew some bipartisan support from Democrats, which demonstrates that this is not just some partisan issue. Frankly, how could anyone not support increasing penalties for convicted felons who continue to break the law and put the American people at risk?

These two bills are now headed to the Senate for consideration, and I urge the Senate to act swiftly on the bills. I have no doubt that, if enacted into law, these bills would protect American lives and make our country a safer place.

When it comes to combatting illegal immigration, we cannot just stop with these two bills. We must also take action to secure our borders, improve internal security, and close loopholes in various immigration programs.

I am committed to working with President Trump to push through the strong immigration policies that he was elected to implement. This is all about the safety and security of the American people, and there is no greater responsibility than that.

Bradley Byrneis a member of U.S. Congress representing Alabamas 1st Congressional District.

See more here:
Bradley Byrne: Combatting illegal immigration - Alabama Today

Report: Immigration Enforcement Causing Illegal Aliens to Self Deport – NumbersUSA

Published: Mon, Jul 10th 2017 @ 12:45 pm EDT

The Pueblo Chieftain reports illegal aliens are returning to Mexico after recent ICE enforcement activity in Colorado. This is prompting growers to increase their reliance on legal guest workers or to shift away from crops that require field labor.

Increased ICE enforcement led to the arrest of 14 illegal aliens the Pueblo area this year. Sources said illegal aliens are now self-deporting rather than run the risk of having a parent arrested or even sentenced to prison for immigration violations.

Due to the risk of arrest, "Fewer and fewer local people have been taking part in the (farm) labor pool anymore," grower Michael Hirakata said. He applied for 60 federal H-2A worker visas this year. "I know growers in this area have also changed their crops in response. You don't see as many onions being grown anymore because that's a crop that requires field workers."

The Colorado Department of Labor reports that growers filed applications for 316 H-2A visas this year, up from 234 in 2016.

Read more in The Pueblo Chieftain.

Updated: Mon, Jul 10th 2017 @ 2:59pm EDT

Excerpt from:
Report: Immigration Enforcement Causing Illegal Aliens to Self Deport - NumbersUSA

Gov. hopeful: ‘I am going to fight for, and defend the people of Georgia, not illegal immigrants’ – WXIA-TV

Governor candidate says Democrats should be blamed for rape and torture of woman because of immigration policies.

Joe Henke and Adrianne Haney, WXIA 6:54 PM. EDT July 10, 2017

A conservative candidate looking to become Georgias next governor is drawing scrutiny for comments on his Facebook, claiming Democrats so-called failed immigration policies should be blamed for two tragic crimes in Gwinnett County.

Candidate Michael Williams is using both examples to push for the statewide expansion of a federal immigration program meant to grant local law enforcement officers the same authority as federal immigration agents.

The program is called 287(g), and Williams believes it could have played a role in stopping two separate incidents which involved illegal immigrants.

On May 12, multiple teens were charged for allegedly breaking into a Gwinnett womans apartment and assaulted and raped her in front of her children. Federal officials confirmed 19-year-old Josue Ramirez, one of those accused in the case, entered the U.S. illegally.

In another disturbing case, Isabel Martinez allegedly stabbed her entire family to death, leaving only one survivor. Homeland security confirmed she was also in the U.S. illegally.

In a statement on his campaign website, the state senator from Forsyth County wrote, It is the Democrat policies that are out there that are opening up our borders allowing illegal immigrants to come into our country at free will. If that hadn't happened that horrible incident in Gwinnett County would have not happened either."

On Monday, 11Alives Joe Henke spoke to Williams. Williams said he isn't trying to gain politically from recent tragic events, but in his opinion, they show a failed immigration system.

"I'm in no way, shape or form trying to politicize these events, he said. But we do need to be made aware that they are happening and it is because of the policies that the democrats and the liberals are pushing.

He said if he were elected governor, he would push for law enforcement agencies across Georgia to expand 287(g), which became federal law in 1996. Currently, ICE has 287(g) agreements with 45 law enforcement agencies in 18 states. Only four counties in Georgia participate in the program Cobb, Hall, Whitfield and Gwinnett.

However, one immigration advocate told 11Alive 287(g) could do more harm than good. Azadeh Shahshahan with advocacy group Project South said expanding a program like it could dissuade undocumented immigrants from talking to police when they witness, or become victims, of crime.

"Immigrants and people of color in our communities are going to feel less safe again talking to the police about anything, if that would mean that they could potentially be placed in deportation proceedings, Shahshahan. That, as a result, would lead to less safe communities for all of us."

Still, Williams believes that if 287(g) were already state-wide, there would be less of these incidents.

2017 WXIA-TV

Read the original:
Gov. hopeful: 'I am going to fight for, and defend the people of Georgia, not illegal immigrants' - WXIA-TV