Archive for July, 2017

Fox News host insults Hillary Clinton’s presidential ambitionshere’s how Chelsea responded – The Daily Dot

BTW

Lisa Boothe filled in on Fox NewsThe Five on Friday, and as the panel discussed Russiaand President Donald Trump, Boothe pivoted to Hillary Clintons presidential ambitions.

Though Boothe said the big winner of the Russia controversy is Vladimir Putin, who she said is probably riding shirtlesson a horse off into the sunset chugging vodka, as America descends into chaos, she also took a shot at Clinton and her daughter, Chelsea Clinton.

It didnt take long for Chelsea Clinton to respond. Heres what she tweeted Saturday morning.

Say this for Chelsea Clinton: She doesnt fall into the Twitter mistake of posting something snarky or mean in response to someone who has insulted her mom. Instead, shes composed on social media and lays out the facts as she sees them, and as a result, her responses, as we saw when she defended Barron Trump, usually end the confrontation on a positive note.

See original here:
Fox News host insults Hillary Clinton's presidential ambitionshere's how Chelsea responded - The Daily Dot

Conway: Hillary Clinton ‘one of the only people’ who believes in Russia collusion – Politico

Counselor to the president Kellyanne Conway said Friday that the goal posts have been moved when it comes to proving cooperation between the campaign of President Donald Trump and the Russian government.

Former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, Conway said, is among a handful of people still clinging to theories of collusion.

Story Continued Below

I mean, we were promised systemic, hard evidence of systemic, sustained, furtive collusion that not only interfered with our election process but indeed dictated the electoral outcome, Conway said on Fox Newss Fox & Friends. And one of the only people who says that seriously these days is still Hillary Clinton and nobody believes it. We know why she lost. It's obvious.

Conways assertion that collusion allegations amount to little more than a conspiracy theory comes days after news broke that the presidents son, Donald Trump Jr., met last summer with a Russian attorney who had had been led to believe possessed incriminating information about Clinton sourced from the Kremlin. Trump Jr. admitted to taking the meeting, which was also attended by then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort and top adviser Jared Kushner, but said no useful information came of it.

The meeting contradicts months of assertions from President Donald Trumps team that nobody from his campaign had coordinated with the Russian government in its efforts to hinder Clintons campaign and aid Trumps. But Conway, who managed Trumps campaign through its final few months, said Friday that she was never short of opposition research on Clinton and did not need to seek it out from any unscrupulous source.

You know, when I needed negative information about Hillary Clinton, I didn't have to go very far. I looked at Hillary Clinton. She was a treasure trove, she said. She was like a treasure box of negative Hillary information with arms and legs.

Sign up for POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news, every morning in your inbox.

By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Conway conceded a point the president himself had made earlier in the week, that campaigns are often on the receiving end of offers of opposition research, although she seemed to suggest that she would turn down such offers. Many meetings end up as a bust that aren't particularly meaningful, consequential or helpful, she said.

Coverage of Trump Jr.s meeting, as well as general coverage of the ongoing investigations into Russias campaign of election interference, has shifted media attention away from ongoing work at the White House, Conway said, depriving Americans of news on what the Trump administration is working on to improve their lives.

So, again, what kind of money are we going to spend by the taxpayers having these infinite investigations, and there are many of them. If were going to do that, fine, I suppose, she said. But we really need to spend our time, also, telling people what's being done here for them.

Missing out on the latest scoops? Sign up for POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news, every morning in your inbox.

See more here:
Conway: Hillary Clinton 'one of the only people' who believes in Russia collusion - Politico

Fox News: Bill Clinton gave a stinging criticism of Hillary’s failed campaign – TheBlaze.com

Former presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton had a warm and engaging speaking event Thursday in Dallas, Texas, at a program for the Presidential Leadership Scholars. Clintons answer to one question sounded suspiciously to commentators on Fox News like a critique of a recent presidential candidate.

Moderator David Rubenstein asked what the most important quality someone would need who is aspiring to be a president. After Bushs very brief but insightful answer, Clinton responded.

I also think you have to begin with the end in mind, Clinton said. You have to say, yeah, you gotta win the election. But why in the heck are you running?

Thats another thing I noticed about him, Clinton said, pointing at Bush. When he ran for governor against Ann Richards, he didnt say Ann Richards is a klutz. He said, I wanna be governor because I wanna do one, two, three things. Couple of em I didnt agree with. But he had an agenda.

If you want to be president, he continued, realize, its about the people, not about you.

Howard Kurtz on Fox News said the former president gave himself enough space to deny the similarities to criticisms of the Hillary Clinton 2016 campaign, but explained why some thought it was a jab at her lack of political skill.

Its obvious to the rest of us what hes talking about, Kurtz said, and look, Hillary Clinton had a campaign where she had a whole laundry list of liberal positions but no theme, no emotional connection to voters, and not much more beyond Donald Trump is awful, and thats what the former president was artfully saying.

Kurtz continued, explaining that Hillary Clinton failed to campaign with certain kinds of voters where she didnt go as well, Martha.

So Clinton, the former president, that is, he added, argued internally during the 2016 campaign, his wife needed to do more of that. He did some of it himself, he went to places like Lansing, Michigan, the final week of the campaign.

The quote from the former president continued after the Fox News video, and many saw instead a pointed critique of President Donald Trump.

And when its over, Clinton said, and thats what a lot of these people who are real arrogant in office, they forget, and it passes more quickly than you know. You wanna be able to say people are better off when I quit, kids have a better future, things were coming together, you dont wanna say, God, look at all the people I beat!

Even during the 2016 presidential campaign many supporters of Hillary Clinton would compare her to her husband, saying that she just didnt have the political skill he had to engage every individual voter. There were reports that her campaign was trying to keep the former president from upstaging her at events.

Read the rest here:
Fox News: Bill Clinton gave a stinging criticism of Hillary's failed campaign - TheBlaze.com

COMMENTARY: Hillary Clinton and her campaign told us so – Globalnews.ca

;

In this file photo, Hillary Clinton delivers the commencement address to Medgar Evers College graduates.

I told you so.

The four most satisfying words in the English language if youre the one saying them, and the most annoying four words if youre on the receiving end of them.

Except perhaps if youre from the Hillary Clinton campaign, in which case I cant imagine saying I told you so to the media and ultimately to the American public would be all that satisfying.

READ MORE: Trump lawyer says Donald Trump Jr.s Russia email chain did not break the law

Earlier this week, the New York Times reported the incredible revelation that after nearly a full year of denying any contact with anyone from Russia, the Trump campaign had indeed met formally with a Russian lawyer with ties to the Kremlin, under the presumption that they would receive damaging information on Clinton. All three Trump campaign operatives, Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner, were aware before the meeting that it was with someone who was described in writing to them as a Russian government attorney with dirt on the former Secretary of State as part of Russia and its governments support for Mr. Trump.

READ MORE: Donald Trump Jr. tried to get damaging info about Hillary Clinton from Russian lawyer

The talking points from the Trump administration and the blind Republican partisans immediately shifted from we never had any contact with the Russians to so what we met with the Russians? The shift was as staggering as it was surreal.

Then on Friday the Associated Press further added to the holes in the already incredibly porous account of the meeting as it confirmed that another person, Rinat Akhmetshin, had attended. As noted by the Associated Press, Akhmetshin has been reported to have ties to Russian intelligence agencies, though he denies ever working as an intelligence agent. He told the AP that he served in the Soviet military in a unit that was part of counterintelligence but was never formally trained as a spy.

READ MORE: Ex-Soviet counter intelligence agent at meeting with Donald Trump Jr., Russian lawyer

As much as I would like to categorize this information as incredibly astounding, the reality is that we have been warned about the possibility of Russian influence in the election from the Clinton campaign as far back as last July. In the run-up to the Democratic convention, Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook told CNN that the leak of the stolen DNC emails was a clear indication that Russia was involved, in an ultimate effort to help Donald Trump.

Mooks claims were not taken seriously, even though we now know at the time Mook made the statement on CNN the FBI had already opened their investigation into potential Russian interference, and into possible ties between Trumps campaign operatives and the Russian government.

Clinton campaign communications director Jennifer Palmieri recently expressed her frustration in writing, I will never understand why he would send a letter to Congress 11 days before the election to let lawmakers know that the FBI had happened upon more emails which they didnt yet know the contents of that may or may not have been relevant to Clinton, but he did not think the public should know that federal agents were also investigating Trumps campaign.

In the last presidential debate, Clinton herself even cited the unanimous conclusion by the intelligence community, both civilian and military, that Russian meddling in the election had indeed happened. The message was barely received.

According to data from Gallup, voters barely factored in stories about possible Russian meddling as it pertained to Trump, while overwhelmingly associating Clinton with negative media stories pertaining to her emails.

Analysis by Gallup of what people have read, seen or heard in relation to Hillary Clinton.

Analysis by Gallup of what people have read, seen or heard in relation to Donald Trump during the election.

Hillary Clinton ultimately lost the election despite having won the popular vote by nearly three million votes because of 80,000 voters in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. It is not outside the realm of plausibility to think that had the media taken the Clinton campaigns warnings more seriously, America would have a competent, qualified president in the White House.

Instead, the president of the United States is a man who has hired his son-in-law with no previous foreign relations or political experience to broker a Middle East peace deal, insults NATO allies, conflates which country he has sent bombs to and constantly embarrasses the office of the president with his Twitter feed.

The Russian government preferred Trump in the election. The Trump campaign knew this and they even had it in writing. You dont have to like Hillary Clinton or think she ran a good campaign to recognize that she was fleeced in the last election. After all, the only consolation she is left with now is being able to say, I told you so.

Supriya Dwivediis host ofThe Morning Show on Torontos Talk Radio AM640and a columnist for Global News.

2017Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Continue reading here:
COMMENTARY: Hillary Clinton and her campaign told us so - Globalnews.ca

Chad Seybold’s bid for Fifth fought – Chronicle-Tribune

The City of Marion is objecting to Chad Seybolds motion to plead protection against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment in a civil lawsuit alleging fraud against Michael An and his companies.

The city filed a brief Friday afternoon in Grant County Superior Court I detailing its opposition, which largely argues that Seybolds request does not meet the legal requirements for the Fifth to be used correctly in this lawsuit.

kAm$6J3@=5 😀 E96 3C@E96C @7 (2J?6 $6J3@=5[ 7@C>6C |2C:@? >2J@C[ 2?5 96 D6CG65 2D 5:C64E@C @C @A6C2E:@?D 2?5 4@?DECF4E:@? @7 E96 ?6G6C 4@>A=6E65 AC@;64E E@ C6AFCA@D6 E96 7@C>6C *|rp @? %9:C5 $EC66E 7@C E96 ?@H56462D65 p?]k^Am

kAm%96 4:EJ 😀 D66<:?8 7C@> $6J3@=5 2== 5@4F>6?ED 2?5 4@>>F?:42E:@?D C6=2E65 E@ p? 2?5 9:D EH@ 4@>A2?:6D[ :?4=F5:?8 2?J :?4@>6 @C 4@>A6?D2E:@? $6J3@=5 C646:G65[ 2?J 3FD:?6DD A=2?D 7@C E96 @=5 *|rp AC@;64E[ 2?J 5@4F>6?ED 2?5 4@>>F?:42E:@?D C6=2E:?8 E@ 2?J G6?5@C[ 4@?EC24E@C @C DF34@?EC24E@C[ 4@?DECF4E:@? AC@8C6DD 2?5 DE2EFD C6A@CED[ 2== 5@4F>6?ED C6=2E65 E@ E96 7:?2?4:2= A6C7@C>2?46 @7 p?D 4@>A2?:6D[ :?4=F5:?8 E2I C6EFC?D 2?5 42D9 7=@H DE2E6>6?ED[ 2== 32?< C64@C5D C6=2E65 E@ p? 2?5 9:D 4@>A2?:6D 2?5 >@C6] %96 4:EJ 4@?E6?5D E96 Sa]d >:==:@? @7 AF3=:4 >@?6J 7C@> 2 %2I x?4C6>6?E u:?2?4:?8 3@?5 8:G6? E@ p? 😕 a__g 7@C E96 C656G6=@A>6?E H2D ?@E 6?E:C6=J FD65 @? 4@?DECF4E:@? 4@DED[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 4@FCE 5@4F>6?ED]k^Am

kAm%96 =2HDF:E[ E9@F89 7:=65 😕 E96 4:EJD ?2>6[ 😀 36:?8 A2:5 7@C 3J AC:G2E6 5@?@CD]k^Am

kAm$6J3@=5 2?5 9:D 2EE@C?6J y@6 z6:E9 {6H:D 2C6 7:89E:?8 E96 4:EJD C6BF6DED 2?5 2C8F65 😕 2 >@E:@? 7:=65 😕 |2J 3J 2C8F:?8 E92E $6J3@=5 92D 2 C:89E E@ ?@E D6=7:?4C:>:?2E6 😕 2 4:G:= @C 4C:>:?2= =2HDF:E]k^Am

kAm%96 4:EJ ?@H 2C8F6D[ 😕 2 3C:67 HC:EE6? 3J pEE@C?6J tC:4 y] |4z6@H? @7 E96 4:EJD =2H 7:C>[ x46 |:==6C[ $6J3@=5 D9@F=5 ?@E 36 2==@H65 E@ :?G@<6 E96 u:7E9 p>6?5>6?E @7 E96 &]$] r@?DE:EFE:@? 3642FD6 9:D A2CE @7 E96 =2HDF:E H:== ?@E 36 E6DE:>@?:2= 2 7@C>2= @C HC:EE6? DE2E6>6?E F?56C @2E9 E92E E96 2>6?5>6?E 5@6D?E 2AA=J E@ 4@>A2?J 5@4F>6?ED 2?5 $6J3@=5 42?E FD6 E96 2>6?5>6?E 😕 DF49 2 3C@25 H2J] %96 4:EJ 4@?E6?5D $6J3@=5 92D ?@E 56>@?DEC2E65 2 C62D@?23=6 762C @7 AC@D64FE:@? :7 E96 5@4F>6?ED H6C6 92?565 @G6C E@ 4:EJ 2EE@C?6JD]k^Am

kAm%96 u:7E9 p>6?5>6?E @C5:?2C:=J 5@6D ?@E AC@E64E 282:?DE E96 4@>A6==65 AC@5F4E:@? @7 5@4F>6?ED E92E >2J 4@?E2:? :?4C:>:?2E:?8 :?7@C>2E:@?[ |4z6@H? HC:E6D] ]]] p44@C5:?8=J[ E@ E96 6IE6?E E92E E96 DF3A@6?2 D666?ED[ $6J3@=5D 24E @7 AC@5F4E:@? H@F=5 36 6?E:C6=J ?@?E6DE:>@?:2=] %96 FD6 @7 D62C49 E6C>D H@F=5 6=:>:?2E6 2?J C:D< E92E $6J3@=5 H@F=5 >2<6 6IE6?D:G6 FD6 @7 E96 4@?E6?ED @7 9:D @H? >:?5 😕 C6DA@?5:?8 E@ E96 $F3A@6?2]k^Am

kAmp44@C5:?8 E@ E96 4:EJ[ E96 5676?D6 92D 2=C625J D2:5 E96C6 😀 2 92C5 5C:G6 H:E9 E96 :?7@C>2E:@? E96 4:EJ 😀 2D<:?8 7@C 2?5[ 2D AC@@7 E@ E92E 4=2:>[ :?4=F565 2 |2C49 6>2:= 7C@> {6H:D E@ |4z6@H? 😕 :ED 3C:67] x? E96 6>2:=[ {6H:D E6==D |4z6@H? E92E $6J3@=5 92D 8:G6? {6H:D 9:D A6CD@?2= 92C5 5C:G6 2?5 D2JD E96J H@F=5 =:<6 E@ 8@ 29625 2?5 56E6C>:?6 E96 D62C49 E6C>D D:?46 E96C6D 2=D@ A6CD@?2= :?7@C>2E:@? @? E96 92C5 5C:G6]k^Am

kAm%96 4:EJ 2=D@ 4@?E6?5D $6J3@=5D >@E:@? E@ A=625 E96 u:7E9 p>6?5>6?E 😀 E@@ 3C@25[ 4:E:?8 2 92?57F= @7 AC6G:@FD 42D6D H96C6 4@FCED 92G6 CF=65 282:?DE 3=2?<6E :?G@42E:@? @7 E96 u:7E9 p>6?5>6?E]k^Am

kAm%96 DF3A@6?2 :?4=F56D ac D6A2C2E6 C6BF6DED] *6E[ $6J3@=5 92D ?@E @776C65 2 32D:D 2D E@ 6249 C6BF6DE H9J E96 24E @7 AC@5F4E:@? H@F=5 E6?5 E@ :?4C:>:?2E6 9:>[ |4z6@H? HC:E6D] x?DE625[ E96 |@E:@? 3C@25=J DE2E6D E92E $6J3@=5 C62D@?23=J 36=:6G6D E92E 4@>A=:2?46 H:E9 E96 C6BF6DE 7@C AC@5F4E:@?[ @C 2?J A@CE:@? @7 :E[ H@F=5 7FC?:D9 2 =:?< :? 2 492:? 6G:56?46 E92E 4@F=5 =625 E@ 2 AC@D64FE:@? 7@C 2? 2==6865 :?G@=G6>6?E 😕 24C:>:?2= 6?E6CAC:D6] %96 =2H 56>2?5D E92E E96 |@E:@? >@C6 DA64:7:42==J 2DD6CE E9:D AC:G:=686 @? 2 C6BF6DE3JC6BF6DE 32D:D] %96C67@C6[ 6G6? 😕 :7 E96 AC:G:=686 5:5 2AA=J 96C6 H9:49 :E 5@6D ?@E $6J3@=5 92D ?@E 256BF2E6=J :?G@<65 :E]k^Am

kAm%96 4:EJD 7:=:?8 4@>6D ;FDE 52JD 367@C6 E96 4:EJ 2?5 $6J3@=5 2C6 D4965F=65 7@C 2 962C:?8 @? E96 >2EE6C 2E `ib_ A]>] %F6D52J[ yF=J `g 😕 $FA6C:@C r@FCE x H96C6 yF586 y677C6J %@55 >2J CF=6 6:E96C 282:?DE @C 7@C $6J3@=5D >@E:@?]k^Am

See the rest here:
Chad Seybold's bid for Fifth fought - Chronicle-Tribune