Archive for July, 2017

Stile: Republican Corrado’s victory aided by Democrat Pascrell – NorthJersey.com

Motivated to boost Currie to clerk's seat

Passaic County Clerk Kristin Corrado is in line to replace Sen. Kevin O'Toole in the 40th District.(Photo: northjersey.com file photo)

Passaic County Clerk KristinCorrado's victory in the 40th Legislative District Senate primary last monthturned out to be one of the more bitter, intra-Republican Party skirmishes this year.

And her success was fueled with the generous support of a familiar Democratic operation.

Corrado's campaign was financed, in part, by family and allies of U.S. Rep. William Pascrell, the former Paterson mayor and Passaic County kingpin. Pascrell's affiliates -- including his son, lobbyistWilliam Pascrell III -- contributed to the Republican Corrado's cause.

The reasons for Pascrell's involvement are varied, but it reflects the complicated,bipartisan tangle of power and interests that have shaped Passaic County politics for decades.

Bill Pascrell(Photo: Susan Walsh/AP)

For one thing, the ties are personal. Pascrell III is close to Peter Murphy, the powerful operative from Totowa and former Passaic County Republican Party chairman who served as Corrado's chief benefactor in her vanquishing of primary rival Paul DiGaetano of Franklin Lakes, who is also the Bergen County Republican chairman.

Pascrell III also said Murphy is the godfather of his youngest child.

But strategically, Corrado's victory in capturing the Republican nomination could open the Passaic County clerk's seat. Longtime Pascrell ally John Currie, who doubles as both state and Passaic County Democratic Party chairman, is eyeing a run to be her replacement.

Pascrell III acknowledged that elevating Currie to that seat -- which paid Corrado over $111,000 last year -- was a strategic imperative.

"John Currie isvery important to me, to my dad, and our organization,'' Pascrell said.

Passaic County Democratic chairman John Currie is considering a run for county clerk.(Photo: northjersey.com file photo)

A couple of key procedural steps would need to take place in order to position Currie to vie for that seat. Former 40th District Sen. Kevin O'Toole of Cedar Grove,resigned from the Senate seat last month,and it is widely expected that Corrado will be selected to be his replacement.

Republican committees from the four counties with towns in the 40th District Bergen, Passaic, Essex and Morris plan to meet Wednesday in Totowa to select O'Toole's replacement.

State law forbids dual office holding, so Corrado would have to step down immediately if she is sworn in as a senator. It would then be up to Gov. Chris Christieto appoint an interim clerk.

If Corrado is sworn in as a senator before Sept.12, an election for county clerk would then be on the November ballot. If she is sworn in after Sept.12, the county clerk's election would be delayed until November2018.

Corrado's campaign was financed by several longtime allies of the Pascrell organization, including $2,600 from Pascrell III. They includedEd Farmer, the congressman's former chief of staff and chief executive of a grant writing firm, who contributed $1,000 and Keith Furlong, who has handled public relations for Currie and other Passaic democrats, who donated $1,000.

Al Gaburo, the Somerset County Republican chairman and is also partner in Pascrell's Trenton lobbying firm, contributed $5,500.

The Eagleton Institute's Center on the American Governor released last week "From Candidate To Governor-Elect: Recommendations for Gubernatorial Transitions," a colorfuland anecdotal how-to guide for the next New Jersey governor. It's culled from interviews from ex-governors and former officials who oversaw the hectic but crucial transitions.

The report's presentation was adorned with several pull-out quotes, including this intriguing one from former Gov. Thomas H. Kean about the potential useful wisdom aformer governor can impart to anewcomer.

Tom Kean Sr.(Photo: CHRIS PEDOTA / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)

"I think former governors can be very helpful to present governors, if present governors have the humility to reach out,'' he said.

That struck as a possible jab at Christie. Kean mentored Christie as a teen-aged aspiring political mover during Kean's first run for governor in 1976. AndChristie's relations with Kean have been rocky since Christie's ill-fated attempt to dislodge Kean's son, Thomas H. Kean Jr., from the Senate minority leader's post in November 2013.

But Eagleton officials noted that the quote was pulled from an interview Kean gave to Eagleton in May 2011 -- two years before Christie's failed coup attempt. In the interview, Kean was referring to the useful and collegial advice he received from two Democratic predecessors, Brendan T. Byrneand Richard J. Hughes.

It's worth noting that theinterview was also conducted only 15 months after Christie's own rocky transition from former Gov. Jon Corzine'sadministration. In an interview on Friday, Kean said Christie did reach out to him for advice during that time.

Read or Share this story: https://njersy.co/2vMSQ6z

Read the rest here:
Stile: Republican Corrado's victory aided by Democrat Pascrell - NorthJersey.com

Severe thunderstorms leave thousands without power in metro-east – Belleville News-Democrat


Belleville News-Democrat
Severe thunderstorms leave thousands without power in metro-east
Belleville News-Democrat
A severe storm passed through the region Saturday night, leaving thousands without power in the metro-east, according to Ameren Illinois. In St. Clair County, 1,809 households didn't have power as of 7:30 a.m., according to Ameren's outage map.

and more »

Read more from the original source:
Severe thunderstorms leave thousands without power in metro-east - Belleville News-Democrat

Golis: What in the world happened to the Democratic Party? – Santa Rosa Press Democrat

(1 of ) MIKE SMITH / Las Vegas Sun

PETE GOLIS

PETE GOLIS IS A COLUMNIST FOR THE PRESS DEMOCRAT. | July 23, 2017, 12:07AM

| Updated 16 hours ago.

Six months into his presidency, people have stopped talking about Donald J. Trump.

Im kidding. Six months into his presidency, people still cant stop talking about Trump. Whether the daily news involves alleged collusion with Russians, various business entanglements, contradictory statements about almost everything or weird handshakes, Trump and his family continue to take up all the air in the room.

Democrats have spent the first six months in a dither, in turns angry and depressed. Of late, however, there are signs that rank-and-file Democrats at least want to move on. The question I hear every day from my Democratic friends is this: What the hell is wrong with the Democratic Party? These Democrats want to know why their side cant produce new ideas and a new generation of leaders.

It is easier in hindsight to recite all the mistakes made by presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and the people who ran her campaign. Its worth remembering that if you flip 80,000 votes in three states, Clinton is finishing the first six months of her presidency.

Still, anyone not living on an iceberg knows that national Democrats couldnt be bothered with the problems facing white working-class folks in Rust Belt cities and rural towns. Once upon a time, this was where the Democratic Party lived, where the party found its greatest strength. Not anymore.

Trumps not going to help these people, Democrats complain. Hes just blowing smoke. (They dont say blowing smoke, but you get the idea.)

Its true that all the presidents promises cant change the basic laws of economics. Consumers wont be lining up to pay $2,000 for the iPhone assembled by workers earning Ohio wages. In the face of a changing energy market, no one is going to be reopening coal mines in West Virginia. And if union members in Michigan think Trump is going to be their friend, they can look forward to new disappointments.

Trump, however, did reach out to these voters. Focused on the demands of identity politics, Clinton and the Democratic Party managed to recite a long list of aggrieved Americans without mentioning working people except when Clinton described some among them as deplorables.

One would think the Democrat Party now would be committed to re-inventing itself, rewriting the messaging that lost the last election, offering up alternatives to Trumps rush to reverse course on health care, immigration, business regulation, trade, taxes, strategic alliances and more. Until now, however, there has been no evidence of that.

Democrats dont have do anything, the argument goes, because voters can see that Trump is such an objectionable person. You will recognize here the same presumption that lost the 2016 election.

In the litany of complaints from rank-and-file Democrats, Nancy Pelosi, the embodiment of the status quo in politics, remains minority leader in the House. Most Americans couldnt name Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. And people still talk about Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders 79 years old by the time the next presidential election rolls around as a presidential hopeful.

In the latest issue of the Atlantic (Whats Wrong With the Democrats?), Franklin Foer argues that success in the cultural wars created a measure of complacency, as if those wars had been won with little cost. In actuality, the losers seethed. If the Democrats intend to win elections in 2018, 2020 and beyond, they require a hard-headed realism about the country that they have recently lacked about the perils of income stagnation, the difficulties of moving the country to a multicultural future, the prevalence of unreason and ire.

The Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank reported see Fridays Press Democrat that Beltway Democrats are finally wising up. This week, he said, Democratic congressional leaders will roll out a new plan that means to spell out what Democrats believe.

Milbank noted recent polls that show only 37 percent of voters believe Democrats stand for something, and 52 percent believe the party just stands against Trump.

The newest promise A Better Deal: Better Skills, Better Jobs, Better Wages could turn out to be more of the same, just more talk and window dressing. Time will pass before we know whether Washington Democrats self-proclaimed reawakening represents an earnest change of heart, or merely a reflexive response to the latest opinions polls and what is available in plain sight for everyone else. When it comes to identifying the obvious, political insiders in Washington are often the last to know.

A longtime supporter of Democratic candidates told me he now fields requests for donations to the party with a standard response: Ill make a donation just as soon as you show me that the Democratic Party stands for something.

Pete Golis is a columnist for The Press Democrat. Email him at golispd@gmail.com.

Continue reading here:
Golis: What in the world happened to the Democratic Party? - Santa Rosa Press Democrat

Republicans are in full control of government but losing control of their party – Washington Post

Six months after seizing complete control of the federal government, the Republican Party stands divided as ever plunged into a messy war among its factions that has escalated in recent weeks to crisis levels.

Frustrated lawmakers are increasingly sounding off at a White House awash in turmoil and struggling to accomplish its legislative goals. President Trump is scolding Republican senators over health care and even threatening electoral retribution. Congressional leaders are losing the confidence of their rank and file. And some major GOP donors are considering using their wealth to try to force out recalcitrant incumbents.

Its a lot of tribes within one party, with many agendas, trying to do what they want to do, Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-N.J.) said in an interview.

The intensifying fights threaten to derail efforts to overhaul the nations tax laws and other initiatives that GOP leaders hope will put them back on track. The party remains bogged down by a months-long health-care endeavor that still lacks the support to become law, although Senate GOP leaders plan to vote on it this week.

With his priorities stalled and Trump consumed by staff changes and investigations into Russian interference in last years election, Republicans are adding fuel to a political fire that is showing no signs of burning out. The conflict also heralds a potentially messy 2018 midterm campaign with fierce intra-party clashes that could draw resources away from fending off Democrats.

Its very sad that Republicans, even some that were carried over the line on my back, do very little to protect their President, Trump wrote on Twitter Sunday afternoon, marking the latest sign of the presidents uneasy relationship with his own party.

Winning control of both chambers and the White House has done little to fill in the deep and politically damaging ideological fault lines that plagued the GOP during Barack Obamas presidency and ripped the party apart during the 2016 presidential primary. Now, Republicans have even more to lose.

In the 50 years Ive been involved, Republicans have yet to figure out how to support each other, said R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr., the founder of the American Spectator, a conservative magazine.

On Capitol Hill, Republicans are increasingly concerned that Trump has shown no signs of being able to calm the party. What Rep. Charlie Dent (R-Pa.) called the daily drama at the White House flared again last week when Trump shook up his communications staff and told the New York Times that he regretted picking Jeff Sessions to be his attorney general.

This week was supposed to be Made in America Week and we were talking about Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Dent grumbled in a telephone interview Thursday, citing White House messaging campaigns that were overshadowed by the controversies.

[At the White House, an abrupt chain reaction: Spicer out, Scaramucci and Sanders in]

As Trump dealt with continued conflicts among his staff which culminated Friday in press secretary Sean Spicer resigning in protest after wealthy financier Anthony Scaramucci was named communications director he set out to try to resolve the Senate Republican impasse over health care.

The president had a small group of Republican senators over for dinner last Monday night to talk about the issue. But the discussion veered to other subjects, including Trumps trip to Paris and the Senates 60-vote threshold for most legislation, which Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has said he will not end. That didnt stop Trump from wondering aloud about its usefulness.

He asked the question, Why should we keep it? recalled Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.), who attended the dinner.

Two days later, some Republican senators left a White House lunch confused about what Trump was asking them to do on health care. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) said the next day that while the president made very clear that he wants to see a bill pass, Im unclear, having heard the president and read his tweets, exactly which bill he wants to pass.

The White House says the president prefers to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare. McConnell has also raised the prospect of moving to only repeal the law. Neither option has enough votes. Nevertheless, McConnell plans to hold a vote early this week and bring the push to fulfill a seven-year campaign promise to its conclusion, one way or the other.

One of the things that united our party has been the pledge to repeal Obamacare since the 2010 election cycle, said White House legislative affairs director Marc Short. So when we complete that, I think that will help to unite the party.

Trumps allies on Capitol Hill have described the dynamic between the White House and GOP lawmakers as a disconnect between Republicans who are still finding it difficult to accept that he is the leader of the party that they have long controlled.

The disconnect is between a president who was elected from outside the Washington bubble and people in Congress who are of the Washington bubble, said Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.), who works closely with the White House. I dont think some people in the Senate understand the mandate that Donald Trumps election represented.

Trump issued a casual threat at the Wednesday lunch against Sen. Dean Heller (R-Nev.), who has not embraced McConnells health-care bill. Look, he wants to remain a senator, doesnt he? Trump said in front of a pack of reporters as Heller, sitting directly to his right, grinned through the uncomfortable moment.

Heller is up for reelection in a state that Trump lost to Hillary Clinton and where Gov. Brian Sandoval (R) was the first Republican to expanded Medicaid under the ACA. Heller later brushed the moment off as President Trump being President Trump.

But some donors say they are weighing whether to financially back primary challengers against Republican lawmakers unwilling to support Trumps aims.

Absolutely we should be thinking about that, said Frank VanderSloot, a billionaire chief executive of an Idaho nutritional-supplement company. He bemoaned the lack of courage some lawmakers have shown and wished representatives would have the guts to vote the way they said they would on the campaign trail.

[Trump threatens electoral consequences for senators who oppose health-care bill]

Its not just the gulf between Trump and Republican senators that has strained relations during the health-care debate. The way McConnell and his top deputies have handled the legislation has drawn sharp criticism from some GOP senators.

No, said Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.), when asked last week whether he was happy with the way leadership has navigated the talks.

As he stepped into a Senate office building elevator the same day, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) would not respond to reporter questions about how good a job McConnell has done managing the health-care push. He flashed a smile as the door closed.

McConnell has defended his strategy, saying the process has been open to Republican senators, who have discussed it in many lunches and smaller meetings. Still, when it came time to write the bill, it was only McConnell and a small group of aides who did it. There was no outreach at all to Democrats, who have been united in their opposition.

In the House, the prospect of passing a 2018 budget this summer and a spending bill with funding for the Mexican border wall that Trump has called for remain uncertain, even though Republicans have a sizeable majority in the chamber. GOP disagreements have continued to erupt during Speaker Paul D. Ryans (R-Wis.) tenure. There are also obstacles in both chambers to achieving tax reform, which is expected to be among the next significant GOP legislative undertakings.

Trump critics said the ongoing controversies over Russian interference in the 2016 election and probes into potential coordination with the presidents associates would make any improvement in relations all but impossible in the coming months, with many Republicans unsure whether Trumps presidency will survive.

The Russia stories never stop coming, said Rick Wilson, a vocal anti-Trump consultant and GOP operative. For Republicans, the stories never get better, either. There is no moment of clarity or admission.

Wilson said Republicans are also starting to doubt whether the bargain they made that they can endure Trump in order to pass X or Y can hold. After a while, nothing really works and it becomes a train wreck.

[Its an insane process: How Trump and Republicans failed on their health-care bill]

Roger Stone, a longtime Trump associate, said Trumps battles with Republicans are unlikely to end and are entirely predictable, based on what Trumps victory signified.

His nomination and election were a hostile takeover of the vehicle of the Republican Party, Stone said. He added, When you talk to some Republicans who oppose Trump, they say they will keep opposing him but cant openly say it.

Some Republican lawmakers have been pained to talk about the president publicly, fearful of aggressively challenging their party leader but also wary of aligning too closely with some of his controversial statements or policy positions. Instead, they often attempt to focus on areas where they agree.

On foreign policy, I think he very much is involved in a direction thats far more in alignment since hes been elected with a bulk of the United States Senate than during the campaign, said Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.

Amid the discord, there are some signs of collaboration. The Republican National Committee has worked to build ties to Trump and his family. In recent weeks, Trumps son Eric, his wife, Lara, and RNC chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel, among other committee officials, met at the Trump International Hotel in Washington to discuss upcoming races and strategy.

That meeting followed a similar gathering weeks earlier at the RNC where Trump family members were welcomed to share their suggestions, according two people familiar with the sessions who were not authorized to speak publicly.

Yet the friction keeps building. Among Trumps defenders, such as VanderSloot, who said the president is trying to move the ball forward, there are concerns he is picking too many fights with too many people. I think hes trying to swat too many flies, VanderSloot said.

The broader burden, some Republicans say, is to overcome a dynamic of disunity in the party that predates Trump and the current Congress. During the Obama years, it took the form of tea party-vs.-establishment struggles, which in some cases cost Republicans seats or led them to wage risky political feuds.

There was a separation between Republicanism and conservatism long before he won the White House, said former Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele. The glue has been coming apart since Reagan.

Kelsey Snell contributed to this report.

Read more at PowerPost

Read this article:
Republicans are in full control of government but losing control of their party - Washington Post

Why is a Texas Republican blocking union reforms? – The Hill (blog)

Despite the states reputation as a conservative bastion, the Republican speaker of the Texas House refused to pass a number of conservative reforms during the regular biennial legislative session, as a result, the states governor has called lawmakers back for the first special session since he was elected as governor.

Gov. Greg Abbott called the legislature back after conservative fallout, spurred by legislative inaction, following the close of the regular session.

Items like ethics reform, property tax reform, school choice, and the renewing of a commission that ensures doctors in the state remained licensed were left unaddressed, mostly due to a House blockade under the leadership of Speaker of the state House Joe Straus.

Conservatives in the state have been pushing for repeal for some time. Two legislative sessions in a row, legislation has passed the Texas Senate only to be obstructed in the House.

In 2015, Texas last legislative session, a bill was filed to end the practice.

Although it passed through the State Senate, stall tactics often used by Straus to kill legislation blocked the bill from advancing.

Using one of the members of his governing coalition, Texas state Rep. Byron Cook, Straus delayed the bill until there was no chance of it passing the full House before the final deadline.

House leadership has a history of holding conservative reforms hostage because of union cash. Though most union campaign contributions went to Democrats, public unions spent more than $1.6 million on Texas legislators during the most recent campaign cycle.

Overall, Speaker Straus received the most of those dollars, bringing the bulk of union contributions during his speakership to over a quarter of a million dollars. After Straus, the second highest Republican was Cook.

Those who control how legislation moves through the House are more than willing to give in to union demands so they can enjoy their continued support. A letter released by one of the unions following the last legislative session shows how much they value Straus and Cook.

State Representative Byron Cook is Chairman of the powerful State Affairs Committee and is closely aligned with Joe Straus, Speaker of the Texas House of Representatives. Last session, our friend Byron Cook led the effort that stopped further consideration of the bill that would have ended payroll deduction of union dues.

The letter goes on to urge members to support Cook at the polls for his reelection as he felt his seat was vulnerable.

After the bill to end union dues collection was killed last session, activists spent the interim voicing their desire to see the issue reconsidered.

The states Lt. Gov. created a task force to further explore union dues reform, two million primary voters voted overwhelmingly in favor of a proposition to end the practice, and delegates to the states 2016 GOP convention passed a plank calling for its end as well.

The proposition, while non-binding, passed by 83 percent to 17 percent, and the convention plank passed by 96 percent.

Even Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, has weighed in on the issue. Norquist sent a letter to lawmakers in April urging them to vote YES on the House and Senate versions of the bill.

Legislators had their marching orders, the large majority of Texans wanted them to ban government entities from collecting dues.

As expected, the Senate passed the bill without a hitch. But again, the House was the impediment to its final passage. Indeed, despite being a priority of the governor, it didnt even receive a committee hearing in the House.

Unions oppose the legislation because they claim it is a union-busting measure, but in reality it just stops government from performing a function that it shouldnt be doing in the first place.

An argument often used is that it is easier and more secure for their members to have dues deducted through government rather than any of the other methods offered by private companies.

That is simply untrue, the notion that government provides a more user-friendly and secure method than the private sector is laughable. Government systems are often the target of data breaches and hackers, many of which are successful.

As a matter of fact, two of the ten largest data breaches happened to Texas government entities.

In 2011, the Texas Comptrollers office discovered a breach that made the personal information of 3.5 million Texans public, costing taxpayers over $1.8 million. In 2012, personal information of 6.5 million Texas voters was compromised mistakenly by the Texas Attorney Generals Office.

Aside from those large hacks, the Texas Department of Public Safety, Dallas Police Department, and Texas Police Chiefs Association have all been hacked.

With as many advancements that have been made in online banking, it takes no more than a few clicks, similar to setting up a direct deposit or auto-pay for bills, to sign up for dues deduction.

Some Texas teachers associations, like the Houston Federation of Teachers, are already transitioning its members to a non-government dues collection method.

Starting in August, all 6,000 members of that union will be transferred from the government dues collection program to automated bank draft that will deduct dues after their pay has been deposited in their accounts. If the government system is easier and more secure, why make the transition when there is no state government mandate to do so?

Through their complacency with this current process, lawmakers are allowing government to be involved in a partisan fight.

Unions use dues to pay for lobbyists who often lobby for legislation that negatively impacts small businesses, like minimum wage laws.

Also, they use funds for organizing efforts like rallies and protests like their ongoing, summer-long organized effort called the Summer of Resistance. The effort is meant to promote rallies, protests, and demonstrations to oppose Texas sanctuary city law.

The arguments made against reforming this practice are selfish, the sole reason Texas unions are fighting to keep it in place is because they dont want their membership to consciously have to pay their dues. Requiring them to make the decision every pay period, quarter, or year means that members would be more likely to question what benefits they are receiving in exchange for the dues they are paying.

This legislation does not prohibit or limit anyones ability to join a union, restrict speech, or actions of that union, it simply requires them to collect their own dues the way that the private sector does.

Because of the states biennial legislature, Texans usually have to wait two years to reconsider reforms that their legislators failed to address. This time, they are being given a second chance to address this and many other issues.

With the special session currently underway, time will tell if lawmakers will side with the will of voters or if union influence will prevail.

Charles Blain is the executive director of Restore Justice USA, a criminal justice reform project of Empower Texans. He campaigned for Texas Gov. Greg Abbott in 2014 and has a background in public policy. Follow him on Twitter @cjblain10

The views expressed by contributors are their own and are not the views of The Hill.

Read more from the original source:
Why is a Texas Republican blocking union reforms? - The Hill (blog)