Archive for July, 2017

The real liberal critique: Republicans aren’t liberals – The State


The State
The real liberal critique: Republicans aren't liberals
The State
James Fallows, in The Atlantic, describes their behavior as the most discouraging weakness our governing system has shown since Trump took office. He singles out Nebraska Sen. Ben Sasse for scorn because he leads all senators in his thoughtful, ...
When shrieking liberal protesters went low, John McCain went highWashington Examiner
America's liberals want Republicans to not be RepublicansThe Japan Times

all 2,720 news articles »

Read more here:
The real liberal critique: Republicans aren't liberals - The State

Letter: I don’t recognize today’s liberals – Lodi News-Sentinel

Posted: Monday, July 24, 2017 2:30 pm

Letter: I dont recognize todays liberals

Editor: Imitation is the greatest form of flattery so I thank Mr. Maurer.

Ever since the 1960s Ive debated the lefts descent into tyranny using specific examples of the ruling elites disdain for those they believe are below their class. To counter my arguments of the lefts vitriol, ignorance, anger, and disinformation he uses my exact same language. He holds up the Constitution and the Bill of Rights inferring the left holds these rights to be true and given to us by God as our founders proclaimed over and over again. Yet at every opportunity they have torn down these ideals doing their best to do away with our rights stated in the Bill of Rights and in 2012 tried desperately to do away with God in their political plank.

The book I referred to by Mr. Owens, Liberalism or How to Turn Good Men into Whiners, Weenies and Wimps was directed at todays liberals. But this disease of the spirit where everyone is a victim infects liberals of every race or political party. The liberal of my youth is foreign to present-day liberals.

The liberals of my day were closely akin to our founding documents while todays liberal is more closely associated with Marx and Engle. Intolerant of independent thought outside the accepted beliefs of the group think, Our children have been indoctrinated into this mind-numbing philosophy and the proof is in what has happened to a once vibrant Democratic Party and higher academia that once fought for free speech and inclusion descending into anarchy with not one constructive belief to run on.

What do Democrats stand for? All I see is violence, intimidation, personal attacks. Mr.Maurer ends with my opinion reminds (him) of the story about a mother attending her sons graduation from Army boot camp who exclaimed: oh look, my son is the only one in step. That would be my ma but she would correct you and tell you her son is a United States Marine like his father before him of which she was most proud.

Ronald Portal

Lodi

Posted in Letters to the Editor on Monday, July 24, 2017 2:30 pm.

Originally posted here:
Letter: I don't recognize today's liberals - Lodi News-Sentinel

Democrats, left out of health-care process, double down on protests – Washington Post

On Tuesday, for the second time, Democrats and progressive activists watched a partial repeal of the Affordable Care Act rise from the dead. For the umpteenth time, Democrats and activists fanned across Capitol Hill, trying failing, for now to make the vote excruciating for Republicans.

And for the umpteenth time, they argued in public aboutwhat to do next.

The Democrats day began with dueling rallies that got sparse media attention. House Democrats held a newsconference promoting the Better Deal agenda that had been released on Monday; a coalition of progressive groups held their own event on the lawn just north of the House. A press stand set up for cameras stayed empty as Nina Turner, the new president of Our Revolution, emceed a formal introduction of the progressive Peoples Platform.

We know what you did last summer, but you have the opportunity to do something in the summer of 2017, said Turner, in what seemed to be a veiled reference to the 2016 presidential primary and her relatively lonely endorsement of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).

The Peoples Platform, unlike the Better Deal, was tied to specific legislation bills that progressives had introduced, but did not expect to bring to a vote in a Republican Congress. A wide-ranging agenda, from universal health-care coverage to automatic voter registration, got a point-by-point sales pitch from members of the House Progressive Caucus.

They are ideas that have been tested in every other developed country, so why dont they work here? asked Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.).

When the rally was over, Turner led the hardiest protesters a few blocks away to the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee. You dont treat people [like this] who have come to the Peoples Platform who are not violent, who are regular citizens, Turner said through a bullhorn. When we say Medicare for all, thats what we mean.

Republicans sent around the clips of Turner et al protesting the DNC, encouraging the party infighting. But in the afternoon, when the vote to proceed to an ACA repeal debate became inevitable, Democrats once again embraced protests.

After the vote, and after Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) gave a blistering speech about the process, most Senate Democrats headed down the stairs of the Capitol, where TV cameras were waiting for them. Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) saw a crowd of a hundred-odd protesters that had gathered across the plaza. They started out to meet them and were stopped by Vice President Pences motorcade, rolling out.

Get the sergeant of armsout here, Schumer said to a staffer. The vice presidents gone. We want them to come up here.

While staffers negotiated the details of how close protesters could get, Schumer and the Democrats walked into the Senate swamp and started talking to protesters. There was no amplification; protesters reached over each other for photos, cheering for Democrats they recognized.

We are going to fight and fight and fight until this bill is dead! said Schumer.

The crowd cheered. Schumer started to say that if the bill was stopped, Democrats would work with Republicans to improve the ACA.

Single-payer now! shouted some of the protesters. Single-payer!

The Democrats gave a series of short speeches, amplified or interrupted by some of the people who had been sitting in at Senate offices or waving signs outside the Hill.

We dont know how theyre going to do it, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said about the upcoming amendment votes.

They dont know how theyre going to do it! yelled a protester.

After 15 minutes, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) led Democrats back to the steps. They spoke through a bullhorn, urging activists to keep pressure on their Republican colleagues.

How about we fill the streets outside every Republican office in America? asked Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.).

For the next several hours, Democrats maintained a live stream of activists and senators talking from the Capitol steps. More protests were planned for the rest of the week, with the coalition that had spent the morning arguing spending the next days encouraging people to wage sit-ins at Senate offices.

See more here:
Democrats, left out of health-care process, double down on protests - Washington Post

Democrats slam EPA head, want to understand his climate inquiry – Ars Technica

Enlarge / Texas' Eddie Bernice Johnson.

Lamar Smith, head of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, has a penchant for releasing letters in which he complains about issues related to climate change. He has targeted everyone from state attorneys general who are investigating fossil fuel companies to NOAA scientists (and their e-mails).

But Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-Texas), the ranking Democrat on the committee, has released a letter or two herself, including one in which she sharply questioned whether Smith was appropriately overseeing scientific research. Now, Johnson and two other Democrats on the committee have turned their attention to Scott Pruitt, head of the Environmental Protection Agency. The subject? Pruitt's plan to have the EPA engage in a show debate over our understanding of climate science.

For the letter, Johnson was joined by Don Beyer (D-Va.) and Suzanne Bonamici (D-Ore.), fellow members of the Science Committee. The letter cites a Reuters report about Pruitt's idea of creating a "red team" with the goal of poking holes in our current scientific understanding of climate change. The letter notes that Pruitt has claimed that "there are lots of questions that have not been asked and answered" about climate change, though he hasn't clearly specified what those are.

The Democrats' letter helpfully notes that lots of questions regarding the climate have been asked and answered by the reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. It and many scientific academies have examined the extensive scientific record and concluded that the evidence for a human influence on the climate is unequivocal.

"In the face of this overwhelming agreement on the basic fact of human-caused climate change by the world's scientists, your efforts seem to be divorced from reality and reason," the Representatives wrote. "This only reinforces our skepticism of your motives in engaging in a clearly unnecessary, and quite possibly unscientific, red-team-blue-team exercise to review climate science."

Still, as part of their function in governmental oversight, the representatives would like to know what the exercise would look like. So, they're asking Pruitt to specify what the procedure will be, how long it will take, and what the end product will look like, as well as how the members of the two teams will be selected. Finally, they ask that Pruitt specify what the purpose of revisiting the IPCC reports is and how the results will be used. They would like Pruitt to provide the details by mid-August.

The questions Representative Johnson and her colleagues are asking are not unreasonable. The EPA has made no official statement on whether the red-team-blue-team debate is actually being considered. Instead, Pruitt has said that planning has started in an interview with Reuters, inspired by (of all things) Op-Ed pieces in major newspapers. He even suggested that the debate might be broadcast on TV. During the interview, he did lay out a number of questions that presumably fell into his "not been asked or answered" category (three of the four had been answered; the fourth is an opinion).

While dismissing the idea of a debate as political posturing might be tempting, it could have significant consequences. Under the Clean Air Act, the EPA is committed to an Obama-era endangerment finding regarding greenhouse gases. Unless that endangerment finding is reversed, the EPA will be compelled to formulate some form of emissions regulations. A show debate may signal that Pruitt is ready to attempt the process of formally rejecting the scientific evidence behind the finding.

Read the original post:
Democrats slam EPA head, want to understand his climate inquiry - Ars Technica

Democrats Go ‘All-In’ for Virginia Governor’s Race – NBC News – NBCNews.com

Northam, with his wife Pam, left, son Weston, and daughter Aubrey celebrate his victory in the Democratic primary during an election party on June 13, 2017 in Crystal City, Virginia. Cliff Owen / AP

The DNC is all-in in Virginia, DNC Chairman Tom Perez said in a statement. We are training organizers, doubling our boots on the ground, and making significant investments in our digital and data operations that will help lift Democrats to victory up and down the state ballot.

In addition to doubling the number of paid field organizers in the state, the money will be used to beef up the partys operations in the state, including training, digital and tech.

Perez is also sending three of his top political aides, including Chief of Staff Sam Cornale, DNC Political and Organizing Director Amanda Brown Lierman, and DNC political adviser Ramsey Reid, who ran get-out-the-vote operations for the Virginia Democratic Coordinated Campaign in 2016.

Northam comfortably won his primary against former congressman Tom Perriello, but it left him with

A new Monmouth University poll released Monday shows the

Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) remains popular, but Virginia's constitution prohibits governors from serving more than one term.

See the rest here:
Democrats Go 'All-In' for Virginia Governor's Race - NBC News - NBCNews.com